ร—
Clay and Buck

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Sen. Paul: Testimony Indicates Fauci Lied About Gain-of-Function

4 Aug 2022

BUCK: Weโ€™ve got Senator Rand Paul with us now of Kentucky. Senator, thanks for calling in.

SEN. PAUL: Absolutely. Thanks for having me, Buck.

BUCK: So, what are you trying to get to the bottom of here with these hearings, with gain-of-function research? What should the American people know about this and why are we digging deeper into it?

SEN. PAUL: You know, a million Americans died, 6.4 million people died around the world, and Iโ€™m actually just shocked that the other side โ€” and many on the Democrat side are not curious at all. Wouldnโ€™t we all want to know if thereโ€™s a chance, even a chance that this came from a lab? Wouldnโ€™t we want to know, and wouldnโ€™t we want more oversight on the kind of research that creates novel viruses that increase their transmissibility or increase their lethality?

I donโ€™t understand why anybody wouldnโ€™t want to know. But we had yesterday the first hearing ever on gain-of-function. Gain-of-function is when you take a virus of known lethality and then you try to make it more infectious or more lethal. This was the research that was going on in Wuhan, China, and we were funding. When Dr. Fauci was asked directly about it, he says, โ€œOh, no, weโ€™re not doing that.โ€

But we had three scientists yesterday โ€” including a scientist whoโ€™s the leading advocate for better oversight of this โ€” whoโ€™s been talking about this since 2004. He testified yesterday that what Dr. Fauci said was false, that they were doing gain-of-function research; it was funded by the NIH. And interestingly, Dr. Fauciโ€™s claim that his people reviewed it and found it not to be gain-of-function was not true, either.

Thereโ€™s a committee, a pandemic committee that oversees these viruses, and if theyโ€™re supposed to be dangerous or could cause a pandemic. They never reviewed the research in China. To make things mattersโ€ฆ To make matters worse, the three scientists yesterday testified that the pandemic review committee thatโ€™s supposed to preventing stuff like this from happening is secret. We donโ€™t know the names of the scientists on it, and their reports are secret. We do know that theyโ€™ve only investigated three different research contracts, but they didnโ€™t investigate any of the Wuhan research that was going on that may well have led to this virus and this pandemic.

BUCK: And Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx and some of the others, Walensky, who have been pushing so much policy during the covid pandemic. Iโ€™m sure youโ€™ve seen, Senator Paul, theyโ€™re continuing with this, โ€œYou need to mask up indoors. Theyโ€™re continuing with the belief that the vaccines work really well. What are you gonna do if Republicans have control of the Senate and the House? Which Iโ€™m hoping and this audience is hoping is whatโ€™s gonna happen relatively soon here.

Clay and BuckWhat else is gonnaโ€ฆ? You know, what else do you want to chase down about covid, about the pandemic? I mean, Ron DeSantis of Florida, the governor, just reminded everybody earlier this week that the health establishment of this country thought it was okay to approve BLM riots out in the streets while people couldnโ€™t see their sick relatives in the hospital or hug them or touch them. Whatโ€™s gonna happen if you can actually hold hearings the way you want to?

SEN. PAUL: Weโ€™ll investigate every last bit of this. We will subpoena all of Dr. Fauciโ€™s records. Weโ€™re gonna find out whether there was a cover-up. Within the first month, there was a letter issued into Lancet, a scientific journal, that said it was a conspiracy theory to indicate you believed this came from a lab. This letter was organized by the main funder of the Wuhan research. EcoHealth Alliance was funding the research.

He worked behind the scenes to get scientists to sign the letter saying youโ€™re crazy if you think this came from a lab. He was covering his butt. Well, weโ€™re gonna find all of this information through subpoena. As far as what works and doesnโ€™t work, thereโ€™s a host of information โ€” in fact, a plethora of information โ€” that shows that putting stickers on the floor does nothing but enrich the people who make the stickers.

It doesnโ€™t slow the virus down. Plexiglass doesnโ€™t work. Masks donโ€™t work. Where people wore masks or where they didnโ€™t where masks, they had exactly the same transmission. In states that were under lockdown like California versus states like Florida that were open, no difference in the transmission of the illness, no difference in death rate ultimately.

So really I think what weโ€™re gonna do is weโ€™re gonna bring in the scientists, weโ€™re going to discuss this and have science and have evidence and have studies presented. But we canโ€™t do this again. I mean, they about destroyed our country. The massive inflation that weโ€™re experiencing now is because of the lockdown and all the checks that were passed out.

BUCK: Speaking to Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky. And, Senator, you mentioned inflation, the checks that were passed out. What do you want to tell people about this bill that now Joe Manchin seems to have breathed new life into, the anti-inflation spend-and-tax bill?

SEN. PAUL: Itโ€™s a terrible idea to raise taxes when youโ€™re in a recession. All indications are weโ€™re in a recession. I think weโ€™re in a recession that will get worse. But the tax increase is a surefire way to make the recession worse and to exacerbate unemployment. Even Barack Obama in 2018 said, โ€œWeโ€™re not gonna raise taxes during a recession.โ€ Chuck Schumer used to believe this. Most economists have said, โ€œDonโ€™t raise taxes in a recession.โ€ So itโ€™s a really bad idea.

But if you think the Democratsโ€™ electoral prospects were bad, when they pass this, prices are going to go up. Thereโ€™s a special tax on natural gas. As we enter into the fall and winter season, people are gonna see their heating bills go up and their natural gas bills go up. Everyone. Not just rich people, everybodyโ€™s bill is gonna go up. So this is going to be a disaster for the country, and itโ€™s something we can only hope that maybe one senator, Senator Sinema, might say, โ€œMy goodness, do I really want to vote for something that itโ€™s gonna lead us further into recession?โ€

BUCK: Do you think thereโ€™s a chance, Senator Paul, that Senator Sinema may back off of this?

Clay and BuckSEN. PAUL: Iโ€™m seeing that sheโ€™s โ€” and I only know what Iโ€™m reading publicly. But what Iโ€™m reading publicly is that she has some doubts about part of it. If I had to guess, sheโ€™s gonna maybe whittle down some of the taxes โ€” wonโ€™t be quite as bad โ€” but the overall bill is gonna still be bad for the country. Can she make it less bad? Perhaps.

BUCK: Senator, we also heard all across the state of Kentucky, your home state, and I know that there have been dozens killed in the recent flooding. Youโ€™ve been following this issue very closely, trying to get government attention and resources to help folks affected. How is that recovery effort going? What can you tell us?

SEN. PAUL: You know, if youโ€™ve seen any of the pictures of dramatic rescues by helicopter, itโ€™s just out of this world. But we have saved dozens and dozens of people who might not have made it but for the great rescue workers. These are EMT, helicopter pilots, National Guard, police, fire. All the first responders are just doing an incredible job. As we do, there will be a long effort to clean up and to get people back into houses, shelter, food, et cetera, clothing.

And then really as we get beyond that, one of the things Iโ€™m already starting to talk about is whether or notโ€ฆ You know, we have great sophistication in measuring rainfall and predicting rainfall and tornadoes. Certainly, as we measure rivers rising, maybe there needs to be a secondary sort of alarm system. It can be the same tornado alarm system but maybe it goes off such that people are saying, โ€œTheyโ€™re now telling us the second alarm means the riverโ€™s gone up three inches, and within the next hour thereโ€™s a chance itโ€™s in my house.โ€ (crosstalk)

BUCK: Senator, how quickly did this come on? For people that maybe donโ€™t know the story, the background, how quickly did this flood happen?

SEN. PAUL: We had 10 and a half to 11 inches in the space of several hours.

BUCK: Wow.

SEN. PAUL: Youโ€™ll see that sometimes on owe the Gulf Coast in hurricanes. I grew up in the Houston area, and I remember getting 27 inches in four days. And thatโ€™s a lot of rain, and youโ€™d have standing rain on the ground. But Houstonโ€™s flat. Whereas this is all the rain thatโ€™s collected. So if you have 10 inches of rain โ€” but all of the area of 10 inches of rain for miles and miles drains into one gully or one holler โ€” you can see the effects can be, you know, 50 feet of water rising in a matter of hours. And I think it truly was this. And it was also particularly unfortunate because of the rain was coming in in the evening and past midnight. So a lot of the flooding was occurring after midnight when people are asleep and not maybe as aware of the warnings.

BUCK: Senator Paul, always appreciate your time, sir. Thanks for calling in.

SEN. PAUL: Thanks, Buck.

Clay and Buck
Clay and Buck

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.