Rafael Mangualโs Solution to NYC Crime
27 Jul 2022
CLAY: We are joined now by Rafael Mangual. He is a senior fellow, head of research for the Policing and Public Safety Initiative at the Manhattan Institute, contributing editor of City Journal, also the author of Criminal (In)Justice. Rafael, youโre in-studio with us here in New York. Appreciate you being here. Buck and I have been talking a lot about so many of these viral New York City crimes that have been caught on video, that have spread.
Most recently โ Iโm sure youโve seen it โ a 16-year-old kid fighting with a police officer in the subway. Itโs been everywhere, that video. Whatโs going on in New York City? Based on the research and data that you have, are you optimistic in any way that things are getting better? Are we getting worse from here? How did we get to this place where crime is an omnipresent fear for a huge majority of people in the country right now?
MANGUAL: Well, Iโm not optimistic at all. I do think things are gonna get worse for quite a bit of time. And part of that is โcause weโve made so many serious structural changes to our criminal justice system, to our policing system over the last several years โ everything from bail reform, to discovery reform, to the Right to Know Act, to the real discouragement of proactive policing tactics, stop-and-frisk, what have you โ that our criminal justice system no longer has an infrastructure in place to kind of keep up with the pace of crime as itโs gone up.
And so, I think weโve been caught off guard as a city, and until we make the decision to kind of reestablish those pieces of that puzzle that need to kind of work in concert with one another, weโre gonna find things are gonna get worse for a while. The case you mentioned, the 16-year-old fighting police officers, I think one of the most interesting things about that case is that that kid had previous charges that involved armed robbery, firearm possession. This is someone who arguably probably shouldnโt have been on the street at that time, and what weโre seeing a lot more of are these really heinous offenses committed by people who have 15, 20 prior arrests.
BUCK: Yeah, itโs clear that thereโs no fear of the justice system, right?
MANGUAL: Yeah!
BUCK: If youโve already been caught, weโre not even talking about people that get away with things. And one part, Clay, of the analysis of the Baltimore crime situation that I think didnโt get nearly enough attention is that theyโre solving one-in-three murders?
CLAY: A tiny percentage.
So great to see that my new book, CRIMINAL (IN)JUSTICE, was featured in todayโs @MailOnline: https://t.co/IGXB7fiJIp
If you havenโt already, make sure you grab yourself a copy! https://t.co/N3YgQjut3a
โ Rafael A. Mangual (@Rafa_Mangual) July 27, 2022
BUCK: One-in-three murders solved means two out of three theyโre not even solving. So people, even, who are caught, never mind those who are getting away with things, donโt have any fear of the criminal justice system. So, Rafael, I want to know when you dig into this and youโre looking at all the data, the numbers, and how these systems are functioning of criminal justice so poorly that theyโre not keeping people safe, that the city numbers are showing New York, San Fran, L.A., Houstonโฆ We canโt name all of them.
MANGUAL: Sure.
BUCK: Those too many cities with the crime going up, 50, a hundred arrests. How does that happen? Meaning, like, where are the breakdowns in the system where some guy, they go, โOh, we found the guy who murdered the liquor store clerk yesterday. Turns out he was arrested 50 times.โ
MANGUAL: Yeah.
BUCK: How did he get to arrest 50 without ever serving a long stretch, 10, 15 years in prison?
MANGUAL: Because our criminal justice system is a lot more lenient than people would have you believe, right? Thereโs this narrative in our country thatโs kind of taken hold in the mainstream for decades now, and that narrative says that we systematically denied people second chances, right? We have Second Chance Month in the United States. When you look at the average person in prison in the United States today, they have 11 prior arrests and nearly five prior convictions. (chuckling) We are not systematically denying people second chances.
We are giving them chance after chance after chance. In cities like Chicago, the average person charged with a shooting or homicide has 12 prior arrests, 20% have more than 20 prior arrests. The reality is that our criminal justice system has always kind of used lengthy terms of incarceration as sort of a last resort. Only 40% of people who are convicted of a felony at the state level are then sentenced to a postconviction prison sentence. People think that you get caught with a little bit of weed and youโre going away for 10 years.
BUCK: This is the narrative.
MANGUAL: Thatโs the narrative.
BUCK: This is the โend mass incarceration,โ idea (impression) โSome guy was caught way marijuana cigarette. Now heโs serving 50 years!โ Thatโs not whatโs actually happening. How does racism as a fear โ or, rather, concerns of racism within the system, how has that shaped the current criminal justice reality?
MANGUAL: Well, I think thatโs put defenders of the sort of traditional institutions that constitute our law enforcement apparatus on their back foot because itโs a really hard topic to discuss, especially given the heightened tensions around that topic, and so people have really kind of leaned into the narrative that our criminal justice system is structurally racist in a bunch of different ways by highlighting these disparities of enforcement, highlighting racial disparities and arrests and police use of force and incarcerations. What often gets left out of that conversation, though, is that thereโs another side to that ledger, right?
Thereโs criminal victimizations, and those arenโt evenly distributed either, right? Weโre in New York City right now. A minimum โ a minimum โ of 95% of our shooting victims every single year for which we have data are either black or Hispanic, almost all of them men. Itโs one of the starkest, most persistent racial disparities in our criminal justice data, and we hear almost nothing about it from the advocates, right? And so, when you start to take those realities into account, you start to realize two things: One, that we have to sort of take the disparities with a little bit of a grain of salt.
Because we have to control for the realities that that concentration of crime leads to, which is a disproportionate deployment of police resources to communities where theyโre needed the most. I remember back in the nineties where the sort of critique of the NYPD was that they werenโt responsive enough to black crime, right? Youโd hear it in rap music: They respond in five minutes to a 911 call in a white neighborhood, but it takes 20 minutes to get a response in a black neighborhood. This was the critique.
Well, now, the criminal justice system has become more responsive to crime that has concentrated in low-income minority communities, and that means that we have to accept that the interactions police have are gonna reflect that reality, that the number of people arrested for certain crimes are gonna reflect that reality. And if youโre uncomfortable with those disparities and the enforcement statistics, I ask people, โWhy would you be comfortable with the disparities and the victimization statistics,โ right?
Like, we know that the homicide decline from 1990 to 2014 added a whole year of life expectancy to the average black man in the United States. It only added 0.14 years of life expectancy to the average white man. So ask people, โWhy would a system that you say is designed and operated to oppress low-income, minority communities produce such benefits that are unequally distributed within these communities when the system achieves its stated end, as stated by the people at the systemโs helm?โ Ask any police chief in America, โWhat do you want to achieve?โ โCrime declines.โ โWhoโs that gonna help?โ Not rich white people.
CLAY: That is a phenomenal analysis, by the way, and an easy analogy to draw here too for, if people out there are having to fight back against the racism argument, we use on this show, โAre police sexist?โ They overwhelmingly arrest men. That isnโt because theyโre out there trying to arrest men. Itโs because men overwhelmingly commit violent crimes and, as a result, are wildly and disproportionately represented in the people who are put behind bars for violent crime. All right. So you have a magic wand.
They come to you โ weโll use New York City as an example โcause weโre sitting here right now โ and they say, โYou get to implement three policies that you believe, or a couple of policies, what should we be doing to drive down violent crime?โ Youโre given a magic wand; you donโt have to worry about the political attacks, everything else. What would happen that you could implement as a result to lower violent crime in your mind?
MANGUAL: One thing that people donโt mention nearly enough is that I would drastically increase the funding directed at our criminal justice system. One of the reasons we talk about issues like bail reform, et cetera, are largely a function of how long it takes a case to get from filing to disposition, which influences how long peopling stand to spend in (crosstalk).
BUCK: I just want to tell you, I have a longtime friend in the district attorneyโs office in New York who said, one thing that no one focused on at all was that in response to some of these anti-police, sort of proโฆ I donโt know. โPro-crimeโ is how you describe it, but that the โcops are too roughโ groups, was that they changed the requirements for how muchโฆ Like, they essentially made the burden, paperwork and bureaucrat burden of bringing every prosecution so high that it dramatically dropped down the number of actual cases ADAs can bring, just in terms of man-hours.
MANGUAL: Right. Right.
BUCK: They just said, โWe need to do so much paperwork and so much stuff that we canโt even spend the hours to bring the prosecutions we want.โ
MANGUAL: And on top of that there was no additional funding given for them to comply with that additional burden, right? We see this across the criminal justice system. You know, lots of people complain about overcrowding in prisons. Every time try to spend money on increasing our carceral capacity, what do you hear? โNo new jails!โ Right? Lots of people complain, want to impose new requirements on police to file all kinds of paperwork, comply with corporate monitors, et cetera. Again, no new funding added for that.
The idea is, I think, is that we want to starve in beast by giving it all this additional work to do and then weโre not gonna fund that effort at all and even though weโll get less policing, weโll get less prosecutions, less incarceration because thatโs what we really want. Fine. I wish they would be a little more open about that, but fine. But then letโs have the debate about what that means for the communities you claim to represent. Because, again, crime is not evenly distributed. In New York City 5% of streets segments see 50% of all crime: 3.5% of street segments see 50% of all violent crime.
Right? If you live on the Upper West Side of Manhattan in a nice building with a doorman, the police can reduce stops and frisk by 90%, your life is probably not gonna change. But if you live in Brownsville Brooklyn, Washington Heights, Mott Haven in the South Bronx, itโs a very, very different story, and I think we need to tell that story more. So, one thing is additional funding. There are a couple ofโฆ The discovery reform, the bail reform I think should certainly be reexamined. Police funding needs to go up. The recruitment and retention crisis is real. But the main thing is that we need to get all these institutions back on the same page.
We could count on in the 1990s what the police, the prosecutor, the judges, the correctional system, parole board, they were all on the same page. They all wanted to do the same thing, and that was take dangerous criminals off the streets and give communities room to breathe. Now we canโt really count on that. Oftentimes the police are working at cross-purposes with prosecutors, at cross-purposes with judges, with the judiciary, with the parole board. And so when you see somebody whoโs got 50, a hundred prior arrests, what that tells you is the police are actually still doing a pretty good job of focusing their resources on the people that pose the biggest dangers, but the rest of the system is not doing its job.
BUCK: I can say that does hurt. From the cops, I know from my time with the NYPD, that hurts morale a lot.
MANGUAL: Absolutely.
BUCK: Cops really donโt like having to wrestle someone to the ground and go, โOh, this is 50th time weโve had to do this.โ
CLAY: Same guy.
BUCK: Same guy.
CLAY: If people love what youโre saying, Rafael โ and I bet thereโs a ton of people out there in our audience who do โ how can they find you, what can they do to read more about your content?
MANGUAL: Check out all of our work at the Policing and Public Safety Initiative at the Manhattan Institute, Manhattan-Institute.org. Iโm also contributing editor at City Journal, which has been covering this issue for decades, doing an outstanding job โ City-Journal.org โ and my book is Criminal (In)Justice: What the Push for Decarceration and Depolicing Gets Wrong and Who It Hurts Most.
BUCK: Iโm gonna buy a copy today.
MANGUAL: Yeah, yeah, sweet.
BUCK: Weโre gonna have a copy here on the shelf after I read it, added to the list.
MANGUAL: Fantastic.
BUCK: Thanks so much, Rafael.
CLAY: Fantastic, man. We appreciate the time.
Recent Stories

The Legendary Dr. Laura Brings Advice for People and Parents
The great Dr. Laura stopped by to talk family and culture with C&B!

VIP Video: Democrats Try to Turn Signal App Flap into Scandal
Watch C&B analyze the story of the day. Spoiler alert: There's not much here.

Behind the Scenes on Air Force One
Clay reveals inside details of his weekend flying with the president.

Clay's Takeaways from His Weekend with President Trump
Miss Clay on The Will Cain Show? Watch it here.

LISTEN: Clay Interviews President Trump
Clay spoke with President Trump on Air Force One on the way to the NCAA wrestling championships in Philadelphia. Listen to it here.