Poll: 76% Disagree with Bidenโs SCOTUS Quota
31 Jan 2022
CLAY: We called it the Bidas touch, Buck: Everything that Joe Biden touches turns to crap, whether it is the border, whether it is everything surrounding covid, whether it is the inflation rate and the economy, whether it is Afghanistan, maybe whether itโs Ukraine. Basically everything that Biden could do that heโs involved with, he makes worse. And this is interesting.
Heโs finally got his Supreme Court opportunity to make an appointment to replace Justice Stephen Breyer, and I saw this stat from ABC News over the weekend: 76%, Buck, of the American public disagrees with Joe Biden choosing to name a black woman to the Supreme Court based on her race and sex in advance before we even know who that woman is. Now, that doesnโt mean that theyโre opposed to the idea of a black woman on the Supreme Court.
Just that, Buck, I would say in general, there are probably a hundred people that are qualified to be Supreme Court justices based on their educational background, based on their jurisprudence, based on the jobs that they have held. Letโs say there are a hundred people โ and the audience may be broader than a hundred, but letโs say thereโs a hundred. Roughly 50 of those are Republican potential nominees, 50 of those are Democratic potential nominees.
So, if Joe Biden did what Donald Trump did, which was put out a list of potential nominees that he was going to considerโฆ I love that idea. I think itโs one of the best things that Trump did, because it let people know, โHey, these are the guys and girls that are going to be in the running to become a Supreme Court justice if an opening occurs,โ which obviously was occurring because of Scalia in that election, right?
โIf this occurs, these are the people Iโm gonna consider.โ If Joe Biden, Buck, had come out with a similar list, letโs say he narrowed it down to 20 and he had black, white, Asian, Hispanic, people on that list, and he ended up selecting a black woman, I donโt think anybody would have said that it was an issue at all. But when you say specifically, โI am going to put a black woman on the Supreme Court,โ 76% of Americans disagree with that.
And, remember, even in 2020 California voters shot down the idea of using race as it pertains to college admissions. So in a 50-50 country, Buck, to get 76% of people disagreeing with Bidenโs pre-existing quota that heโs going to put a black woman on, that heโs only going to consider black women, that heโs not going to consider 94% of the overall population, this is the Bidas touch one more time, Buck. Heโs even blown it on his Supreme Court pick based on the criteria that he put in place.
BUCK: In doing what Biden has done here โ and you analyzed this well last week when we were discussing this โ he actually upsets everybody except people in this country who explicitly want a racial entitlement state, which, as Iโve said, I believe an Alito line from a pretty recent Supreme Court decision on the issue of affirmative action. Effectively, yeah, weโre going to make determinations as a country, as a society about who gets what based upon skin color โ I mean, based upon your actual skin color โ because of historical wrongs or because of disparate impact or any number of theories that the left uses to justify what is really the clearest example that you can think of right now of the violation of equal protection under the law.
There is no such thing as equal protection under the law if some people get some things because they are a certain skin color or a certain ethnicity, religion, whatever the case may be. The left has gotten away with this for a long time by playing this game. Remember, no quotas, canโt have quotas. What they do is they say, โWe have a holistic practice here.โ The holistic practice they use for college admissions at a place like Harvard โ which is gonna be at the forefront now because of the Supreme Court case that has been brought, โcause Harvard is aโฆ
Remember, itโs not just that Harvard explicitly penalizes Asian-American and Asian students, โcause obviously people from all over the world will apply. Bbut Asian-American applicants. The way they penalize them, Clay, there was a lot โ and this is in the court documents. This is a matter of record. Somehow a lot of Asian applicants, the Harvard admissions committee says, โWell, lacks personalityโ or โlacks leadership.โ They come up with these kinds of amorphous, subjective criteria to knock them down and not take them.
Itโs so blatant, so obvious what theyโre doing. So to your point about the Bidas touch and what Biden did here, he made explicit what usually the left allows some gray area and wiggle room with. When you say, โI will only hire a person who fits in this category,โ not only are you violating equal protection โ and not only are you clearly engaged in, letโs just say it, discrimination, folks โ that is, if I own a house and I say, โI will only rent my house to people who are from the South Pacific,โ thatโs discriminatory.
You canโt do that. But with Biden, heโs also upset a large portion, I think, of Democrat voters who realize this makes it seem like you would not have whoever this black Supreme Court justice โ female Supreme Court justice โ will be were it not for this pre-existing promise which undermines them on the bench in a way that upsets the left too. So thatโs why I think heโs kind of made everybody whoโs paying attention agitated by this. But itโs interesting โcause at the time, politically โ when he needed to win South Carolina โ this was considered an astute move.
CLAY: Yeah, and I think thatโs significant, by the way, Buck. Not only has he undermined his own candidate, this woman, itโs gonna be the crowning moment of her career. You get nominated to the Supreme Court, it is the absolute apex of any lawyer who has aspired to this role of their career, and many people are going to react to this by saying the only reason sheโs getting this is because he limited his criteria to 6% of the population, to black women. This honestly may call into questionโฆ Alan Dershowitz, who is a pretty skilled constitutional lawyer, said this might be unconstitutional itself. Listen to this cut.
DERSHOWITZ: I think it may be unconstitutional. If he had said he was gonna appoint the first Muslim to the court, that would be unconstitutional โcause the Constitution, Article VI, specifically provides that no religious test shall ever be required. I think the Fourteenth and Nineteenth Amendments also extend that to no racial or gender tests. Nobody should ever be excluded because they donโt fit a racial or gender criteria. To announce in advance no whites, no males need apply, brings us back to the days when the Supreme Court was an exclusively white male institution.
BUCK: Can I just say, last week when I said he couldnโt do thisโฆ If you were hiring a CFO for your huge company, you couldnโt say, โNo white males, by the way; nobody except for black females allowed in this role.โ People would recognize that as problematic. It just wouldnโt sit right, never mind even just the immediate legal implications.
Youโd say, โHold on a second. Thatโs notโฆ You canโt really do that,โ right? The same clearly is housing, the same thing, and now when you sit here; you say, โShouldnโt this even be a higher standard of that application of principles?โ The notion that you would say this for a Supreme Court seat? Itโs actually outrageous, when you sit there and think more through it.
CLAY: Just think about what the reaction, Buck, would have been when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, if Donald Trump had come out and said, โIโm only considering white women to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg,โ the left would have lost its mind. They would have lost their mind if Trump said that. So Biden says, โIโm only considering a black woman,โ and itโs as if the same standard should not apply.
This is why I talk about principle over politics here. The same logic should apply. Flip it: Trump replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg with Amy Coney Barrett and saying before he even announced her, โItโs gotta be a white woman. Thatโs the only person that Iโm considering.โ That would have been an outrageous act, and Trump would have been dragged over the coals for it. Biden does it and people pretend on the left that it didnโt even happen.
Recent Stories

Georgia Dad Arrested for Leaving Kids in McDonald's to Attend Job Interview
A story out of Augusta, Georgia sparks debate. Should this man have been arrested or given a break?

VIP Video: What the Elections in Florida and Wisconsin Mean
The GOP won both Florida special elections, but dropped the important Wisconsin Supreme Court race.

Jim in Virginia Tells Riveting Story of His Father at Hacksaw Ridge
Today marks the 80th anniversary of the U.S. invasion of Okinawa. iHeart radio app Talkback listener Jim in Virginia tells the story of his dad's service at Hacksaw Ridge.

Florida Congressional Candidate Jimmy Patronis Joins Us on Special Election Day
On Election Day in two key Florida special elections, the Trump endorsed FL-1 candidate talked to C&B.