Democrats Lament That Roe Won’t Win the Midterms

BUCK: I did want to take a moment to make note of this because the Democrats… One thing that’s beginning to sink in is the overturning of Roe v. Wade is not gonna save their electoral fortunes. It doesn’t seem like that’s the case at all. Maybe a percentage point here or there nationally, but nothing in the nature of a major shift. But you’re also still hearing things from some very prominent Democrats that you should pay attention to. You should understand who these people really are.

Elizabeth Warren is someone who I often just make fun of because I do find her — remember, she is somebody who built a career as a fake Native American. That is just a statement of fact. It’s absurd. She’s absurd. But she played the system and she dances to the required tune of the left, then she says the things she’s supposed to say. She is worth like $10 million and always talks about how she hates the rich, et cetera. But when you hear her on the issue of abortion and how she feels about “Crisis Pregnancy Centers,” this… I heard this, and I listen to a lot of stuff and really deep in the news all the time. This was pretty chilling.

BUCK: I’ve been to fundraisers for a well-known Crisis Pregnancy Center here that does not support abortion, trying to help women have their babies here in New York. Notice, Clay, she says, “Wishes them harm,” and I want everyone to be clear. This is a sitting senator in the state of Massachusetts which still has very liberal abortion laws. This hasn’t changed any of the abortion laws in Massachusetts, who’s saying that places that say, “Hey, you are under a lot of duress, we want to help you, want to give you resources, get you medical care, gonna get you counseling, get you baby formula and clothing and assistance for your child that is coming,” those places, “wish those women harm.” She sounds like a psychopath.

CLAY: She is. And I don’t think there has been enough discussion surrounding the idea of how many Democrats support abortion in the ninth month. This is murder — let’s be clear — and if you don’t want to talk about it in the context of abortion for a moment, just take a step back, and this analogy, I think, is very difficult for any Democrat to respond to. So, I would just use this one. If a mother is pregnant… I would love to hear Elizabeth Warren answer this question.

If a mother is pregnant in her eighth or ninth month of pregnancy and she is shot and killed and her fetus inside of her — which otherwise would be viable — also dies, should that be considered a double homicide? My answer is yes. Because if you are the family of that woman who is murdered, you are not just grieving for the loss of that mother, you are grieving for the loss of her child which is still inside of her as well. Would Elizabeth Warren believe that that should be a double murder? I would love to hear her answer that question.

Why, then, does she have a different perspective…? I think she would have to say yes. That would be a double murder. I think that’s a double homicide because there are two lives that have been taken. Why, then, would she be okay with that same situation, someone deciding that they don’t want to give birth to a viable baby in the eighth or ninth month of pregnancy? To me — and this is not just Elizabeth Warren. This is Tim Ryan. This is Stacey Abrams.

These are Democrat politicians all over the country saying that they believe in nine-month abortions being legal. That needs to be talked about and debated. That’s what Roe v. Wade did was it tossed this all back to the states — and, Buck, if we’re not having those debates, then we’re being dishonest, and there should be consequences politically for those opinions — which, by the way, 90% of the American public disagrees with.