×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Jared Kushner on the Mar-a-Lago Raid and His Book

23 Aug 2022

CLAY: We’re joined now by Jared Kushner, senior adviser to President Trump. His book — Breaking History: A White House Memoir — is released today. Jared, what was the writing process like for you? Have you ever written a book? What was your experience like going through it? What did you learn about yourself?

KUSHNER: Well, first of all, Clay, it’s great to be with you, and big fan of your work and all that you guys do. So, for me, I’d never written a book before. So the first thing I did is, obviously I’d read a lot of books, but I took a master class online from James Patterson, and I went through his process. And what I learned from the way he does a book is that the outlining process is the most important part of it.

If you write a good outline, you can write a great book. And so I spent the first three months really trying to catalog all of my different experiences and figure out how I weave them all together. What I wanted readers to feel was the excitement that we felt every day where we had obviously the onslaught of the investigations into Russia and the false impeachments and the congressional inquiries.

But also the accomplishments and how we navigated through as outsiders in Washington to go through all of the different challenges that Trump wanted to do, whether it was creating trade deals with China and Mexico and Canada and Japan or whether it was the work we did in the Middle East or to create the Abraham Accords and all the peace deals or how we dealt with Congress and how we dealt with a very hostile Washington.

So, I think I was able to capture the excitement, and it’s a very fast-paced read. But I learned a lot about myself. It reminded me of a lot of the challenges from earlier in my time in Washington that I probably repressed or had forgotten. But really coming up and telling that story was I think very important to do for people to really understand what happened inside the Trump White House with all the fascination that’s occurred about it for so many years.

CLAY: I’m glad you mentioned James Patterson. I finished his book recently. I think it’s called, like, James Patterson on James Patterson about his life story, and obviously many of you out there I’m sure have read some of James Patterson’s thrillers. But that book was really entertaining, easy, quick read for people out there who may want something. And I sure encourage people to go buy Jared’s book as well. Where were you, Jared, when you found out about the Mar-a-Lago raid and what was your initial reaction?

KUSHNER: My wife and I were actually in Rochester. We were doing some checkups at the Mayo Clinic. And we were really shocked by it, to be honest. It just feels like we’ve been living through this over and over again where, for the last six years, I mean, first they spied on Trump’s campaign, and that’s been proven. You know, they falsified FISA warrants to be able to do that.

We went through two years of inquiries where they basically promised that Trump was a Russian spy and they refused to accept the results of the 2016 election. And we had to go through that. I personally sat for over 16 hours of congressional and special counsel testimony in order to show them that he ran an incredible campaign and won fair and square, all while trying to get our work done, and we dealt with the impeachment.

And I write about a lot of this in my book. I think it’s just time and time again that Trump drives his enemies so crazy that they just go over the top and they break all the norms and push aside all their morals in order to try to get him. And so I was very, very shocked that they would do this. To raid the home of your strongest political opponent is something that happens in Third World countries, and it seems like over something that could have been worked out between lawyers to the degree that there was an issue.

CLAY: Were you a political guy before Trump decided to run for president, and what was that actually like for you to have a father-in-law who suddenly is running for president?

KUSHNER: So, those are interesting questions. I’d studied, obviously, political theory when I was in college at Harvard, and I obviously was involved also with… You know, when you’re in the real estate business, you’re always dealing with local politicians and zoning issues, and politics does affect your businesses because people can move, but buildings can’t move. So, you’re vested in politics.

But I was never thinking to get actively involved. I write about my time that I was working at the Manhattan district attorney’s office. I thought when I was in NYU Law, I thought I’d maybe be a prosecutor. But it was tough. When my father got arrested, I saw that prosecutors left unchecked and often with political motives can really destroy families and have big impacts on people. And it just changed my point of view.

And I was forced at that point to go into business and really help my father’s company. And then I had the chance to build my own companies over the next years. And then with Donald as your father-in-law, nothing was ever boring, and he said he wanted to run for president, and with him (chuckles) there was always something exciting happening. And it was different than when he told us you’re getting inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame, which was also another adventure.

CLAY: (laughing) Did you grow up a wrestling fan, by the way?

KUSHNER: Who didn’t grow up a wrestling fan? Of course we did! But I never dreamed that my father-in-law would be in the WWE Hall of Fame, but I also never dreamed he’d be president.

CLAY: (laughing)

KUSHNER: So he announced he was running, and we were all very supportive of it. But none of us really knew what we were getting into. And I write about it in the book a lot of the different adventures that we had and also for me as somebody who was more of a independent centrist from the Upper East Side of Manhattan who basically started exploring the country and understanding the people who were supporting Trump and starting to see that he was a pragmatist on the issues and he represented people who didn’t have a voice in Washington.

And then being a part of that journey as a fellow outsider to help him fight for all the different policies that he believed in that were against the interests of the Big Business and the Washington establishment was just a thrilling adventure. But they weren’t gonna give up easily, and they fought back viciously. And that’s a lot of the topics that are covered in the book.

CLAY: You did a tremendous amount of work to try to bring peace to the Middle East. And I think you got almost no credit for that. And I think part of it’s ’cause of who your father-in-law is and the administration that you were in. But I saw always really impressed by it. And as part of that, maybe the most ridiculous criticism that we heard against Trump — which took over and over media attention on — you have three kids.

I believe you’re Jewish, and I believe you’re raising those three kids as members of the Jewish faith. When you hear that your father-in-law, the president of the United States, is an awful, racist, anti-Semite — which is regularly levied against him — what is that like? I mean, you know it’s not true, but it’s just such a nasty accusation. I’m curious, as someone of the Jewish faith who is raising the grandchildren of the president in that faith, what was that experience like?

KUSHNER: So at first it was a little bothersome, but then it kind of became less bothersome because you realize that those accusations told you more about the people who were making them than about the people they were making the accusation of, right? So I’m a big believer in finding your own truths, and that’s a lot of what my adventure was, and I write about in the book my journey of really exploration the different issues.

But for Trump if you think about issues of race, you just have to look at his policy. He was an amazing president for black Americans. He worked very hard to pass Opportunity Zones, to bring capital to underserved communities. He fought for school choice to create better economic choice, better choice for people in communities so they can choose to not go to failing schools that are often in poor communities.

He passed criminal justice reform, prison reform which were disproportionately helping the black community. And then in addition to that, under President Trump, the black community’s wage gains were the highest. And now the inflation that’s happened under Biden is really hurting the black community. And then from a Jewish point of view, President Trump was very supportive of Ivanka’s conversion and our raising our kids Jewish and respectful of our faith, and we did a lot of work to combat anti-Semitism.

And his work in the Middle East was truly historic. And I think that when he asked me to lead the efforts in the Middle East, people probably thought, “Well, the Middle East couldn’t get any worse.” If you remember in 2016 ISIS had a caliphate the size of Ohio, Syria was in a civil war where 500,000 people had been killed, Iran had just been given a pathway to a nuclear weapon and $150 billion which they were using to fund Hezbollah, the Houthis, Hamas. It was an absolute disaster.

And President Trump rebuilt our alliance with Israel, and he was a strong supporter of the U.S.-Israel relationship. He rebuilt our alliance with the Gulf countries, who felt very betrayed. And then we totally bucked the conventional wisdom that you had to deal with the Palestinians in order to make progress. And he was able to make the first peace deal in many decades between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.

And then with brawn and with Sudan and with Morocco and with Kosovo, which really is starting the end of the Arab-Israeli conflict, which has been one of the major courses of instability in the world over the previous decades. So it was a historic breakthrough. It took out-of-the-box thinking by a very unconventional president. And again, that’s why it was important for me to write my book because I wanted people to understand how he thought about it differently. And all the media was criticizing the efforts every step along the way, saying why they were wrong, saying why they would lead to war. But President Trump did it differently and created peace deals where nobody else was able to do that.

CLAY: We’re talking to Jared Kushner, senior adviser to President Trump. The book, Breaking History: A White House Memoir. Do you and Ivanka hope that he runs for president in 2024? How would that impact your family’s life? Do you tell him, “Yes, you have to do it”? What sort of conversations do you guys have about potentially that choice?

KUSHNER: So for us, first of all it was an honor for us to serve, but it takes a big toll on the family. You know, we’ve really enjoyed moving down to Miami. You know, it’s funny. We were gonna move back to New York and then it was February of ’21, and basically New York was like Pompeii. The schools were closed, the restaurants were closed, none of our friends were there. So we said, “Let’s give Florida a try.”

I told Ivanka, “We’re about 30 years ahead of schedule, but let’s give it a shot,” and moving down there has been a real blessing for our family. So being away from government where you’re on the clock 24/7 with a lot of serious issues and you can subjugate the family, it’s been a really pleasure getting to know our children and spend time with our children, and we’ve been really enjoying our time back in the private sector doing some philanthropic work. And that’s really been our focus.

With regards to President Trump, he’ll make his own decision. And we’re fully supportive of him and whatever he decides to do. But I think he’s having a very hard time watching the way that they’re destroying the country economically. The inflation is hurting the people that he was fighting so hard to lift up out of poverty. Under Trump, people were coming off of food stamps at record numbers. Inflation was low. Wages — real wage growth was really, really high.

Now the inflation is eating away at the Americans who need the relief the most. And then just on the world stage. I mean, you never would have had a war with Russia when Trump was in power. The media kept goading him and criticizing him for keeping a good relationship with Russia. But I write in my book about several interactions that Trump had with Putin that led to tangible results for America.

He saved our oil-and-gas sector, which, quite frankly, if the current administration would take the shackles off of could lower gas prices like crazy. But instead, they’re choosing to go and beg Iran and Venezuela for oil, which makes no sense to me. And with China. I mean, they’re being very provocative with Taiwan. But for four years under President Trump, none of that happened.

So I think President Trump really had a very unconventional foreign policy. But I think it was an historic policy. And it wasn’t a rebuke of the Democrats. It was a rebuke of the Democrats and the Republicans who had been in Washington before him who, quite frankly, had squandered America’s unchallenged leadership place in the world that they inherited starting in the late nineties.

CLAY: Good stuff, Jared Kushner. Encourage everybody to check out the book, and we appreciate the time.

KUSHNER: Thank you. It’s an honor to be with you, and good luck with everything.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

The 2024 GOP Ticket Should Be Trump-DeSantis

23 Aug 2022

CLAY: Today is primary day in Florida, New York, and I believe Oklahoma. Florida is the one that is going to receive the most attention because we will find out finally who is going to be challenging Ron DeSantis for the governor of Florida. And it appears that Charlie Crist is going to be the nominee. He’s running against Nikki Fried. Nikki Fried, agriculture commissioner statewide, has not been able to catch much fire in this Florida Democrat primary. And so it appears Charlie Crist is gonna be the nominee. He was the governor before.

And there’s the joke that they like to tell in Florida. A Democrat, a Republican, and an independent walks into the bar, and someone says, hey, how are you doing, Charlie? Because Charlie Crist has been in his political career a Democrat, a Republican, and an independent. He now is running as a Democrat, likely to get squashed by Ron DeSantis. And I wanted to point out that DeSantis has been one of the best defenders of Donald Trump since the Mar-a-Lago raid. Now, there have been a lot of, sort of, I would say a little bit of frostiness in the relationship between DeSantis and Trump with many people expecting that DeSantis was going to run for president against Trump.

Now, we don’t know whether DeSantis is going to run or not. But I did want to point out that DeSantis has been — look. I think DeSantis is one of the smartest politicians out there. You don’t go to Harvard Law School and graduate and be a knucklehead; let’s be honest. But DeSantis said what I told you in the start of this first hour definitely true. Federal agencies have been weaponized against people the government doesn’t like. Listen to Ron DeSantis here. We’ll play that in a sec for you. To set it up. It’s cut 3.

CLAY: Look. I love Ron DeSantis and what he has done as governor of Florida. I also love what Donald Trump did in his first term as president. The idea both these guys going head-to-head for the presidential nomination I think could end up happening as it pertains to 2024. Again, Florida primary day I expect that Charlie Crist will be the nominee and that DeSantis will beat Charlie Crist by around seven or eight points, which is an absolute landslide in Florida. And DeSantis has been such a success in Florida that I believe he will have solidly made Florida a red state maybe for a generation to come because so many people moved to Florida over covid. There are far more Republicans in the state of Florida now.

This state, which was the flash point 2000, 2004 — you guys all remember it — in presidential politics the state that would decide the election. Then it was Ohio. Both of those states have moved solidly into the red camp. And I think DeSantis is going to stamp his victory in a big way.

Here’s my thesis on what should happen. We got a lot of Trump people out there listening. We’re gonna talk with Jared Kushner here at the bottom of the hour. And I’ll lay this out for him too. Jared Kushner living down in Florida now, a lot of the Trump family obviously has relocated to Florida. Everyone wants — I think a lot of you out there, I should say — would love the idea of a Donald Trump on president and Ron DeSantis vice president ticket. I think it is indisputably the strongest possible ticket that the Republican Party could put forward in 2024. That’s presuming Trump is running, right? Because otherwise I think DeSantis as a president with a vice presidential choice of his own could make a lot of sense.

The challenge here — and I give credit to a caller — only a couple things callers have said in my radio career. Every now and then it happens where you register such a good point. I’d say the greatest call I ever had — it’s a good tip for you guys. I used to local sports talk radio back in Nashville. Old, old Southern caller called in ’cause I was talking about how I had really bad allergies, and he said, forget all the Zyrtecs, forget all the Claritin, all the different prescription allergy medicine and everything else. Even forget going out and getting all those shots.

Said here’s what you do, “Sonny boy”, I think he said Sonny boy, which is a common phrase for old Southern men. My grandfather used to love that phrase. He said, “just go get local honey in your town, in your region and take a full tablespoon of it every morning, and it will handle your allergies to a large extent”. I’ve been doing that now for about 15 years, and it has virtually cured all of my allergies. I mean, it is — it is remarkable how well that works.

Now, I’m not a scientist, unlike Dr. Fauci. But I would say that his argument, which is again, old school wisdom, is that it’s the pollen, right, the local pollen that the bees are all grabbing from your area is going to help your immune system to be more experienced with it if you’re taking that tablespoon of — has to be local honey — tablespoon of local honey every day. Go down to your farmers market, whatever. It’s remarkable how well it worked for me. Way better than any of the over-the-counter medications. And where I live, Nashville, we have awful allergies. Nashville’s kind of down in a little bit of a bowl, and so everything just kind of settles on it. Anyway, best advice.

We had another caller early in Clay and Buck. I hadn’t really spent much time thinking about it. He called in and said, because of both men being from the same state, they can’t theoretically be on the same presidential ticket. That’s correct. You don’t hear it discussed very much. But since DeSantis is presumably going to be governor and since Trump has relocated and made his primary residence Mar-a-Lago, one of the two of those men would have to have a different base, a different state of primary residency in order for them to share a presidential ticket.

I haven’t heard anybody talk about this publicly. I haven’t seen it written anywhere. I’m a little bit concerned that where Trump would make his base, they may try to, if he moved outside of Florida now to run in 2024, that we would end up with a huge legal case. ‘Cause you can see if he went to another blue state, if he went back to New York to live in Trump Tower or if he went to Bedminster out in New Jersey, you could see how some prosecutor could try to make their bones by saying, you’re not a real resident of this state. How many days have you actually spent here?

So, I’m a little bit curious about this and a little bit concerned about it. But what I would love to see is these two guys come together, sit in a room together — ’cause again, I think DeSantis has been one of the best defenders of Trump out there as it pertains to the Mar-a-Lago raid. And I think it makes it less likely that Trump is going to have a lot of competition ’cause I think it’s coalesced a lot of the support for Trump. Many of you out there listening to me right now may have been ambivalent on the idea of Trump ’24, and as soon as the FBI agents laid siege to Mar-a-Lago and stormed the home there, a lot of you said, no, I’m a hundred percent in the Trump camp. In other words, the political ramifications of this have been far more beneficial to Donald Trump than they have been to Joe Biden and to the Democrat Party in general.

And so, I’d like for these guys to sit down face-to-face, solve their issue, and then I’d like for them — here’s what I would love. When Trump announces, which I hope will be soon after the midterms, I would love for Trump to go ahead and announce DeSantis as his vice-presidential running mate and let them hit ground running in January-February of 2023 because I think DeSantis can make the case for Trump better than Trump can even make the case for Trump.

And then the one thing I will say that I’m nervous about with Trump is just that he’s got four years. Can’t run again. I want that VP to be a bridge where we all know that potentially we’ve got a 12-year ticket, right? So, if Trump is running in ’24 and he’s saying, “DeSantis is my guy, and he’s gonna take you for the next eight years,” that 12-year ticket that I’m voting for in in 2024, that is a really good sales pitch.

And I think DeSantis — Trump has got a bull in a china shop quality to him. You guys know what I’m talking about. Every now and then he’s knocking things over that don’t need to get knocked over. DeSantis is a targeted assassin, right? He’s got the ability to find the weakness like a great lawyer would, distill an argument down, and make it in a really succinct manner. And I think the duo of these two could be incredibly popular.

But Trump needs to find a new residence. And he needs to find a new residence if this idea of mine is going to take root, where he doesn’t have to worry about some blue state loon trying to argue, oh, these guys can’t be a ticket ’cause Trump’s not technically a resident of New Jersey or New York or whatever. So, he needs to — Trump’s got plenty of money — find a place that could be his residency in 2023, make sure that you spend six months and a day there, that you qualify there in ’23 so that you’re set for ’24. This needs to be well planned out. I think it could make a ton of sense. I think it would be the single most ideal ticket for Republicans as we roll ahead into 2024. It’s not a four-year ticket. It’s a potential 12-year ride towards American excellence.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: Laying out my theory there of the best possible ticket and a ticket that could make the case all through 2023 and all into 2024, because Trump is going to announce at a traditionally early date, right? We know January, February, Trump’s gonna run, unless something health-wise happens to him and certainly hope that that’s not the case.

But I would be stunned based on Buck and mine’s relationship — we’ve had Trump on the show a lot. We’re gonna have Jared Kushner on the show in about four minutes. I’ll ask him. But I would be stunned if Trump is not going to run. So, he’s gonna run. He’s gonna announce early in 2023. And you’re gonna be making the case against Biden for basically, then, a year and a half. And I will see whether Biden actually announces and whether Biden’s able to run. But Trump is gonna be in the race, I believe, before Biden is.

And to me, instead of having this prolonged process of who is the VP going to be, how much stronger would it be — DeSantis gonna win by seven or eight points, I think, in Florida — how much stronger would it be if Trump went head and announced with DeSantis at the beginning of 2023? And then you had DeSantis making the case for Trump as what I believe would be the best possible advocate and not just for Trump, but for himself and for that duo over the next 12 years.

To me, that is — right now a lot of you sitting around right now, other than some of you in Florida who I know are like, well, I don’t want Ron DeSantis to leave. We need him as governor. I understand. But it’s like having a really great college athlete who’s ready for the pros. You need your guy; the nation needs DeSantis. I understand. I have property in Florida. I love it down there. But the nation needs DeSantis’ leadership.

So, you gotta let him leave the college ranks and go into the pros. And if Trump could announce with DeSantis by his side — I’m gonna keep beating this drum ’cause I want it to happen — then you would have an incredible duo that is set to dominate not just in 2024, but DeSantis would easily take the reins in ’28 and I think again in ’32 and help to restore some normalcy in this country. So, I’m gonna make that argument. I might even bring it up with Jared Kushner and see what he thinks. He’s a Florida resident. We’ll see what his take on my idea there is.

Recent Stories

Pelosi’s Husband Pleads Guilty to DUI, Two Sentenced in Whitmer Case

23 Aug 2022

CLAY: Paul Pelosi, he’s got incredible timing when it comes to his investments. Well, he’s also got good lawyers. No significant punishment coming for him. This is just coming down earlier in the hour for his DUI. He is going to basically… I think they said he spent five days in jail — that surprises me — surrounding the DUI arrest. But that is going to be his full punishment. That story is basically over. Pelosi is riding off into the sunset to continue to make more and more stock trades with perfect timing, thanks to his wife, Nancy.

We’ve got two Michigan conspiracists who were convicted of trying to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer.

We had updated you on their trial previously. Two of the four men who were charged were acquitted in the prior trial. There were two mistrials. These two defendants who had had a mistrial previously were just convicted on the Gretchen Whitmer case; so that story now complete.

Two not guilty verdicts, two acquittals, and now two convictions on that conspiracy. So a split result in that story, which received a massive amount of attention for that plot alleged against Gretchen Whitmer.

Recent Stories

Our Favorite Prime Minister’s Latest Apology

23 Aug 2022

CLAY: Remember our friend the Finnish prime minister? She passed the drug test. We up… (laughing) We updated you after the aggressive dancing videos. She just apologized because her Instagram influencer friend took topless photos at the Finnish president’s house. I gotta tell you:

I think this Finnish prime minister may be my favorite politician out there. I mean, she’s a handful. But I wish we had scandals like this going on in the United States. Instead of Merrick Garland sending the FBI in, I wish we were apologizing for topless photos coming out of the White House. Maybe Bill Clinton wasn’t so bad after all.

Recent Stories

What If Donald Trump Had Done What Joe Biden Just Did?

23 Aug 2022

CLAY: I’m here with you making the case that what Donald Trump did — despite the front page of the New York Times and what you’re gonna see if you put on MSNBC and put on CNN — is actually not unprecedented at all. For hundreds of years, presidents have taken the papers that they were involved in as president and they’ve taken it back to their houses and back to their homes, and they used those papers to write books about their presidency.

And it wasn’t even until the late 1970s, in response to Richard Nixon, that this presidential papers dispute ever became an issue at all. And it hasn’t ever been applied as it is being applied certainly by Attorney General Merrick Garland. And there’s actually a fantastic Wall Street Journal editorial this morning by David Rivkin and Lee Casey. These are two guys who served in the Justice Department and the White House counsel’s office in the Reagan and Bush Sr. administrations.

The headline is: “The Trump Warrant Had No Legal Basis.” These are astute, learned scholars who have worked in the White House counsel saying there’s no basis at all for the Trump warrant to have been issued, and this is Merrick Garland’s Waterloo. I really cannot impress upon you enough that the radical, unprecedented, indefensible act here was not being committed by Donald Trump at all.

It was the attorney general of the United States signing this warrant and allowing his agents to storm the gates of Mar-a-Lago that has upset the entire precedent of American judicial life. We use the phrase “unprecedented” quite a lot. Generally, it’s not true because for most situations there is a precedent. This is truly unprecedented. What Merrick Garland did, has never been done before in the history of the United States. No time ever, dating all the way back to George W., to George Washington, also including George W. Bush.

All the way up to now has a former president been raided by the Department of Justice at his private residence. This has never occurred. And it’s not just even a former president. It’s the former president who’s going to be running against the current president, potentially. Merrick Garland failed in his judgment to such an extent — I told you that there’s no way he should be able to oversee this investigation because he’s investigating…

You may have heard a great interview that we did with Alan Dershowitz last week where Alan Dershowitz said look, there’s no way that any attorney general could do this because the attorney general has essentially two jobs. He’s serving the president in such a manner that hopes to continue that president’s tenure so that he’s gonna be reelected so that the attorney general can continue to serve and simultaneously supposed to be the unbiased enforcer of American law.

Well, Merrick Garland, who was supposed to be this moderate guy, has unleashed a whirlwind here. Because if Donald Trump wins election in 2024, would it be crazy for Trump, in response to what happened to him with Merrick Garland, to choose an attorney general who would sign off on a raid on Joe Biden’s house? And certainly, we know Hunter Biden’s house… Evidently the White House can’t manage to do an FBI raid of Hunter Biden even though we know his committed potentially dozens of felonies.

But I just want you to think for a moment about what Merrick Garland did. And one way to easily think about this is, what would media reaction have been in 2016 if, when Donald Trump was president, he’d sent 20 FBI agents into Hillary Clinton’s home and they had raided and seized documents inside of her home? The mainstream media, if that had happened, would have said that Donald Trump was a dictator, that he was an authoritarian, that he was helming a banana republic, and that the United States had become a Third World country.

Joe Biden does it to Donald Trump, and almost everyone in that mainstream media has been carrying the water of the Department of Justice saying this was justified. I just want you to put the shoe on the other foot as a good attorney would ask you to do and as Merrick Garland failed to do. Because his job is to ensure that justice is filled but also not to set precedents that allow this country to fall further behind political impulses of justice. Instead, he did the exact opposite.

And for that reason, if Joe Biden had a scintilla of intelligence, if Joe Biden had a scintilla of cognition, if he knew about this raid at all beforehand, he is culpable for it. But if we take him at his word and he did not know, then the moment that Joe Biden found out what Merrick Garland did, he should have demanded his resignation. That’s what Joe Biden would have done if he had any character or decorum at all because the precedent that has been set here is going to unleash whirlwinds and we’re going to turn more and more into these countries that we had hoped that we were better than when it came to our democracies.

In other countries — Kenya, for instance — right now where they’re having a massive presidential election, one reason why you feel like you have to win an election is because if you lose, you know that the political party that comes into power will take advantage of not only you and your family. They will use the apparatus of government to go after you. That is now what’s happening in the United States. Merrick Garland isn’t fit for duty.

Every Republican should be demanding his resignation. And one of the first things that should happen when Republicans take back control of the House is Merrick Garland should be hauled in front of the House Judiciary Committee at minimum and forced to answer all of these questions. And this affidavit in its entirety — I’m not even willing — when I read all the details in this New York Times story I’m not even willing to give the government any basis for redactions at all because they’re leaking this information to the New York Times. It’s all out there publicly anyway, the entire affidavit, the entire thing, every word should be made public, and it should happen this week.

Recent Stories

Making the Case Against Merrick Garland’s Criminal Mar-a-Lago Raid

23 Aug 2022

CLAY: I want to start today with the front page of the New York Times. And the headline is: “Three hundred documents taken by Trump were classified. Volume raised alarm. Request for Mar-a-Lago’s security dates shows inquiry continues.” This is a front-page story in the New York Times — came out last night. Some of you probably saw it. There are four different New York Times reporters that are listed as the authors of this piece.

And all of those authors, significantly, have been well sourced for years in United States government’s decisions to investigate Donald Trump. And so, the significant aspect of this story coming out is, I don’t want you to miss what’s going on. The Department of Justice under Merrick Garland right now is arguing this information is far too dangerous for you, the American public, to even be able to see the affidavit under which we instituted the unprecedented raid of a former president of the United States by the current existing president of the United States, who may well be running against Donald Trump in 2024 and has already run against him in 2020.

You, the American public, this information is too sensitive for you to even be able to see. That is what the Merrick Garland Department of Justice is arguing. Simultaneously they are leaking exactly what those documents are to the New York Times so that their base in left-wing media knows what is going on while you, the American public, cannot be trusted to even know what the danger documents that Donald Trump has retained actually maintains inside of Mar-a-Lago.

Here is the opening paragraph of the story. This story, by the way, we don’t know if it’s true. We know it’s true as the Department of Justice wants it to be true because they are leaking like crazy. I guarantee you that Donald Trump and his legal team read this article and got more information from this New York Times article than they have been able to get from many of the details surrounding the warrant. This opening paragraph is:

“The initial batch of documents retrieved by the National Archives from former President Donald J. Trump in January included more than 150 marked as classified, a number that ignited intense concern at the Justice Department and helped trigger the criminal investigation that led F.B.I. agents to swoop into Mar-a-Lago this month seeking to recover more, multiple people briefed on the matter said.”

“In total,” I’m reading from the New York Times, “the government has recovered more than 300 documents with classified markings from Mr. Trump since he left office,” and so this is what is going on. What I believe is taking place here is the Department of Justice is simultaneously placating all of their left-wing allies by leaking to the New York Times while telling you that you can’t be trusted to know what was inside of Mar-a-Lago.

They haven’t even given Donald Trump an accurate accounting of what was taken from inside Mar-a-Lago; so his staff is not even aware of what has been seized. But do not miss the larger context under which this investigation is taking place. Namely, this is a pretty strong sign that Merrick Garland recognizes he has nothing on January 6th. And I think we’ve kind of, in covering this story, missed a big detail here, which is, look how quickly the Donald Trump hate apparatus out there — the media, the politicians, the left-wingers who are driven insane by Donald Trump.

Look how quickly they pivoted from January 6th is going to lead to sedition, insurrection, treason, all of these different potential charges that they were gonna levy against Donald Trump. Look at how quickly they pivoted. For months all summer long, we heard that January 6th was the new event that was going to for once and for all grab Donald Trump and he wasn’t gonna be able to continue his political career. He was gonna walk out in handcuffs. But look at what happened.

Almost with nary a comment out there, they pivoted from January 6th to the FBI raid over confidential documents with very little bridge between the two. To me, this is evidence that Merrick Garland is letting everyone know out there, “We don’t have him on January 6th. There’s nothing that we can get him on January 6th. We don’t have him.” This is now the litany. The Mueller report, impeachment 1, impeachment 2, all of the Russia collusion, everything that has been alleged by Donald Trump has now boiled down to this.

Think about it for a minute. Did he have documents that he wasn’t supposed to have that were directly connected to his presidency and may have been packed up there and ended up in his office in Mar-a-Lago as opposed to with the National Archives? Let’s think about this for a moment. If these documents are so incredibly dangerous, why does the National Archives need them? Would you think…? I don’t hear anybody asking this question.

But do you think to yourself, you know the safest place for documents to be in America? It’s in the National Archives. Have you ever been to the National Archives? I have. History nerd. I went and looked up records of some of my ancestors what fought on both the North and the South during the civil war. You can go in, you can request documents. They’ll bring ’em out to you.

I was a history major at George Washington University. I’ve been to the archives a few times. It’s not the place where you would want super-secretive documents to be stored. And I don’t hear anybody asking the question, if these documents are so incredibly top secret and classified, why do we want the random National Archives to have them? We’re not talking about these documents being seized and being brought under lock and key inside of the CIA or the FBI or someplace like that.

No, no, no. We’re talking about the historical record being kept so that these classified documents can be in possession of the National Archives. But they’re not able to be reviewed for years by the general public. Yet they’re so important that the classics status makes them top secret and everybody’s in danger. No. This is crazy. I can understand… Look at some of the documents that now they’re talking about.

Trump might have kept a personal letter that Barack Obama wrote to him that he found in the Resolute desk when he showed up in the White House on the first day. I can see how that could happen. Trump reportedly left a letter for Joe Biden as well, which is a historical trend. Typically, one president writes a personal note to the president that will follow him and leads that note inside of the Resolute desk. I actually think it’s a remarkably incredible, historic, and transcendent history that we have that we’ve created that sort of routine, that legacy.

But it’s not surprising to me that Trump would want to keep that letter to him from Barack Obama. And it’s not surprising to me that Trump might want to keep letters from Kim Jong-un that were written to him from when he was president as well. And, remember, this has been going on for generations. It wasn’t until the late 1970s that there were even any rules surrounding presidential records. Prior to that it was very commonplace for presidents to keep all their papers so they could write books, so they could tell the historical story of their time in office.

Think about how trumped up this entire story is. The National Archives is arguing that they should be able to have possession of documents from Donald Trump’s presidency instead of Donald Trump. That seems like a very minor conflict. And, frankly, for most of you out there listening, I bet a lot of you say, “Why wouldn’t Trump have the right to keep letters that were written to him?” And why would the National Archives even have the right to have access to those in the first place?

But even if that’s a dispute, how in the world is this such a dispute that for the first time in over 200 years of American history we’re gonna have a sitting attorney general of the opposing political party sign a warrant to allow FBI agents to storm the gates of the top political rival over old letters from the presidency that the National Archives thinks that they should have? This is an unbelievable, unbelievably ridiculous dispute that is taking place that has escalated far beyond, far beyond where it should have ever gone.

Let me just take a moment. Think about the Mueller report. The allegations against Donald Trump, even though we now know that they were not true, that Russia colluded and caused the outcome of our election to be different, that’s a significant allegation. It’s an allegation that a sitting president is working in conjunction with a foreign government to overturn what otherwise would have been the will of the people to subvert that will and end up president of the United States.

Now, it was a lie. It was all made up. There was no basis to it. But it was a significant allegation. If I told you right now that China had been working in cahoots with Joe Biden to put him into presidential office and subvert the entire will of the American electorate, that would be a significant claim deserving certainly of massive investigation. Now, impeachment 1 over the Russia collusion and Ukraine and all that was a joke, right? Impeachment 2 over January 6th also a joke.

But those were more significant acts. People went into the Capitol because they were unhappy with the outcome of the 2020 election and Trump allegedly encouraged them to go there. Okay. It’s not true, but it’s a significant accusation. The accusation that Trump had an inappropriate phone call with the Ukrainian prime minister and that he was asking him to do diligent research on his top political opponent Joe Biden, all right, it’s not true, it’s illegitimate, but it’s at least something.

Think about what we’re talking about here. Whether the National Archives has a letter or Donald Trump has a letter was used to justify a federal raid on a former president’s home. This is not a significant dispute. Maybe for historians. You might be sitting around if you’re a historian in years to come and want to see that letter. You might want to see what Kim Jong-un wrote to Donald Trump 200 years from now when you’re writing a book or a hundred years from now.

But this idea that the National Archives and where letters that were personally written to Donald Trump should be is somehow so worthy all of a federal investigation that we gotta storm the gates of Mar-a-Lago with 20 plus FBI agents and that the former president is being investigated by the current president for the first time in the history of our Republican? This is impeachable. This is crime worthy. But it ain’t Donald Trump who is impeachable or worthy of being charged with a crime. It’s Merrick Garland. And I’m making the case against him.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: You just heard me laying out what’s actually at stake in this dispute between the Department of Justice and Donald Trump. It’s documents that were, at minimum, we know, specifically referenced in this New York Times article, presuming that it’s coming directly from the Department of Justice, Kim Jong-un letters, Barack Obama’s letter to the president. There may be other documents that he took with him that the National Archives wants to put as part of their presidential records acts there.

But how in the world…? You just heard that dispute. We know that Russia collusion was a hoax. We know that impeachment 1 and impeachment 2, that they failed over and over again to get Donald Trump. The January 6th hearings have landed flat. But all of those were more significant disputes.

They are desperate now inside of the Democrat Party, so desperate to get Donald Trump that they are now wildly exaggerating a relatively minor issue over where old papers are stored either with President Trump or inside of the National Archives to such an extent that Merrick Garland, whose only job as attorney general is to exercise good faith and solid judgment — that’s the job of the attorney general — as it pertains to influencing and impacting and implementing our laws.

That’s his only job. He has made the most significant overreach and the most indefensible decision in our lives, something that no attorney general has ever done before, he signed off on a warrant to raid the top political adversary of his boss, Joe Biden. And he did that to a former president who likely will be the nominee running for president again. And in so doing he has set in place a precedent that does not end here. It is now potentially going to be followed by attorney generals in the years ahead. And for that reason, Merrick Garland cannot remain in office. He should be removed — at minimum, he should resign — and there should be a full investigation into how he came to make the decision to allow these warrants to take place.

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

23 Aug 2022

  • Finland’s party-loving PM Sanna Marin is forced to apologise after two female pals were pictured TOPLESS and kissing each other in her official residence
  • Breitbart: Poll: Gas Prices, Economy, Crime Dominate Midterm Issues
  • HotAir: CNBC poll: 59% think Biden’s next big pander will make inflation worse

  • PJ Media: Biden White House Directly Involved in Conspiracy to Entrap Trump in Criminal FBI Probe
  • Gateway Pundit: “They Knew Everything” – President Trump Calls Out Biden White House for Lying About Their Involvement in FBI Raid on His Home at Mar-a-Lago
  • Breitbart: Khanna: DOJ Is ‘Too Aggressive’ with Secrecy on Mar-a-Lago Raid, There’s ‘Obligation’ to ‘Get all’ Possible Info out
  • HotAir: DoJ leak to NYT: Trump had 300-plus classified documents at Mar-a-Lago

  • FOXNews: Trump files motion seeking independent review of docs seized during FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago
  • BizPacReview: Unreleased text messages between FBI lovers Peter Strzok, Lisa Page reportedly in Russiagate binder
  • UK Daily Mail: Jared Kushner claims he’s ‘not familiar’ with the contents of the 300 classified documents taken from Mar-a-Lago and says America has ‘lost faith in the fairness of the legal system’

  • HotAir: There are so many juicy subplots to the Democratic civil war being fought in New York today
  • UK Daily Mail: ‘Top Gov’: Ron DeSantis launches new Top Gun-inspired campaign ad attacking ‘corporate media’ and ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill critics as Democratic candidates battle to take him on in Florida primary
  • BizPacReview: EPIC thread slams McConnell over his ‘crap’: ‘There was a red wave coming. Then the GOP got involved’

  • New York Post: 80% of new IRS revenue will come from small businesses earning under $200K: tax experts
  • Daily Wire: ‘Raises Demand And Increases Inflation’: Obama’s Top Economist Shreds Biden Plan For Student Loan Cancellation

  • New York Sun: Fauci Resignation Won’t Stop Senator Paul From Demanding Answers on Covid-19 – Dean Karayanis
  • Wall Street Journal: Dr. Fauci and the Rule of Experts. His long service is laudable, but his Covid legacy includes more public mistrust.
  • New York Post: Key to CDC reform is undoing mission creep — and tossing woke programs
  • Breitbart: Fauci Says He Would ‘Cooperate’ with GOP — But This Has Been ‘More of a Character Assassination’ than Oversight
  • Breitbart: Fauci: January 6 Deniers’ ‘Distortion of Reality’ Impeding Proper Public Health Response

  • New York Post: Famed hacker blows whistle on Twitter, claims app is risk to national security
  • New York Post: Elon Musk to push for more Twitter data after whistleblower’s bombshell: source
  • Federalist: TikTok’s New ‘Elections Center’ Is A Massive Threat To National Security
  • HotAir: Was Brian Stelter’s firing about changing the tone at CNN or was it about something else?

  • Daily Wire: ‘Supervillains’: Widow Of Black Police Chief Killed By Rioter Rips Kamala Harris, George Soros For Dividing America
  • FOXNews: California county saw 70% of criminal suspects released on $0 bail commit new crimes: DA
  • Breitbart: NYC Official: We’re Struggling to Deal with Migrants Because Abbott Didn’t Warn Us
  • Daily Wire: Big Rig Hiding Over 1.5 Million Fentanyl Pills Seized By Border Patrol Agents

  • Daily Wire: China Burns More Coal As Drought Cripples Hydropower System
  • Breitbart: Climate Crusader Steven Spielberg’s Private Jet Burns $116K in Fuel in Just Two Months
  • Gateway Pundit: ‘My Bad’ American Federation of Teachers President Shares Fake Banned Books List
  • Daily Caller: Teachers Union President Defends School District That Will Lay Off White Teachers First
  • New York Post: Russian paratrooper’s bombshell diary exposes chaos in Ukraine
  • Recent Stories

    Clay Breaks Down Trans Golfer Aiming for LPGA

    23 Aug 2022

    On America’s Newsroom, Clay discussed James Scott Davidson, who wishes to compete against women in the Ladies Professional Golf Association as “Hailey,” and become the transgender golfer in the sport.

    Recent Stories

    Predictions on the Mar-a-Lago Raid Affidavit Reveal

    22 Aug 2022

    BUCK: This affidavit of the Mar-a-Lago raid, there was some additional news today. Here’s News Nation’s Tom Dempsey talking about how Judge Reinhart — right, isn’t that his name? — has rejected the DOJ argument to keep the affidavit sealed in its entirety. Listen to this.

    BUCK: Okay. So, by Thursday it’ll be out. Clay, a prediction. I’ll put a marker here. One is, we all know there’s gonna be a ton of stuff that is redacted. So blacked-out lines all over the place. But also you’re gonna start to hear a lot of people who were saying, “This has gotta be about a lot more than a classified document dispute,” the Democrat media apparatus is gonna switch to, “Wow. Documents are really… This is really important stuff.” This is big crimes we’re talking about here with the documents that Trump had, as though we don’t remember what they said a week ago.

    CLAY: I think the story is going to rapidly disappear.

    BUCK: Yep.

    CLAY: We said last week, the Cassidy Hutchinson testimony, grabbing the wheel, choking out Secret Service agents, varnished after about six weeks or so. This story, I think, has about one or more week or so in the life cycle and then even left wingers are gonna start to recognize, “Uh-oh. There may not be much to this at all. We may have overplayed our hand all over again.” Yes, you are Charlie Brown, and Lucy is moving the football.

    Recent Stories

    Stelter’s Farewell: “The Free World Needs a Reliable Source”

    22 Aug 2022

    BUCK: We had told you that this is gonna be so sad. But here we are. Brian Stelter. (impression) “He had a good run as the hall monitor of the mainstream media. He would do entire shows when he would basically say, ‘Wow. Fox News and talk radio are terrible, but I’m just here speaking the truth!'” That was Stelter’s whole thing was to just try to attack other sources of information than what are regime approved by the Democrats, and I am  just gonna say this. A lot of people were surprised this guy had a television show. He doesn’t really seem like somebody who would be front of the line to be on TV. I am just saying, the guy doesn’t seem like a TV talent to most folks. “But there he was on Sunday,” and here was how he closed, Clay, his last show. Play it.

    STELTER: I believe America needs CNN to be strong. I believe the Free World needs CNN to be strong. And it will continue to be, ’cause all of us are gonna help make that happen. The Free World needs a reliable source. So, for Reliable Sources, for the last time, I’m Brian Stelter. Thanks for being with us.

    BUCK: (choking up) The Free World needs a reliable source,” Clay.

    CLAY: I’m not an expert on CNN, and I really don’t spend that much time watching television other than sports, which I watch, obviously, a lot. But I don’t… It’s not like I sit around and watch CNN. He did a show once a week. Is that kind of all he did, Buck? Like, how often he was on CNN otherwise?

    BUCK: No, he was a general media critic for them. So, he would appear on other shows. But there’s a whole career path at these news networks where you’re supposed to be talking about the media. But all they’re actually doing is attacking conservative media.

    CLAY: Right.

    BUCK: They exist to say that people like you and me are, you know, spreading misinformation, you know. Brian Stelter supposed to be the little blanky that all of the libs can hold onto to make them believe that they were getting true facts.

    CLAY: Well, we said on Friday — and I’m still a little bit shook by it — that Stephen King tweeted that the only thing he wanted to watch was Reliable Sources. The author Stephen King. I really have never heard anybody say, “Oh, I’m a big Brian Stelter fan,” ever before, right? I understand you might not like Rachel Maddow back in the day, only on one day a week now, but certainly it doesn’t surprise me that Rachel Maddow would have friends or —

    BUCK: I know why libs watch Rachel Maddow. I get that for sure.

    CLAY: Yeah, and I don’t think John Oliver’s show is very good. But I’ve heard people be like, “Oh, I love John Oliver’s show,” and certainly back in the day, people loved Jon Stewart’s show. I don’t know that anybody — maybe just Stephen King — is actually that interested in watching anything Stelter does. Certainly, they weren’t at CNN or he’d still have a job.

    BREAK TRANSCRIPT

    CLAY: I did want to play this too, Buck. We were just talking about Brian Stelter’s Reliable Sources show ending. It did not go out with the guest going after the new owner effectively of the CNN network, John Malone, who has come out and said basically that he thinks CNN got far too left-wing. Stelter had to be a victim. Here’s one of his final guests saying this.

    CLAY: So there you go, going after the owner of CNN on his way out.

    Recent Stories