×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Boris Johnson to CNN: American Democracy Is Alive and Well

27 Jun 2022

BUCK: Here was kind of a funny moment. CNN is sitting down with prime minister of the U.K., Boris Johnson, and I think in the Democrat media certainly, Clay, there’s this sense that you can never overplay or oversell (warbling), “What a danger to our democracy we’re in! We’re in this moment at any point in time… We’re in a dangerous democracy.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: All this stuff you hear, “the threat to our sacred democracy.” Not a lot of talk about that in response to some rioting and some rowdy protests over the weekend and some threats against Supreme Court justices and even a guy who tried to kill a Supreme Court justice. Not a lot of threat to our democracy talk about any of that just like there wasn’t a lot of threat to our democracy talk after months of deeply divisive and destructive riots in 2020 by Democrats, by Biden voters. But the prime minister had this moment where he’s talking to CNN and he’s kind of like, “I don’t know. Maybe you guys need to calm down a little bit.”

BUCK: Wow. CNN. Hold on a second. Wait! You’re supposed to be say, “Oh, your democracy is about to be destroyed, man! It’s all over, man.” Nope.

CLAY: How about the fact that Boris Johnson is more of a fan of American democracy than any Democrat now.

BUCK: Yes.

CLAY: We have to bring in a ringer from England. Isn’t Boris Johnson also an American citizen, by the way? Wasn’t he…?

BUCK: Born here. He was born here. Yeah.

CLAY: Yeah. I think he maybe relinquished his American citizenship.

BUCK: I think you would have to, to be prime minister of U.K., you would think.

CLAY: I’m guessing.

BUCK: Probably not a dual passport holder if you’re gonna be the prime minister, but maybe.

CLAY: At some point he was an American citizen. It doesn’t sound like it, by the way, with that accent, but it is pretty fantastic that he goes on CNN and disabuses them of the notion that the world at large is concerned about the fate of American democracy. And that’s really the subtext, even though no one will discuss it, of January 6th. Agree or disagree with Trump, even inside of the Republican Party, when Trump was president, there were tons of people who were saying to him, “Hey, we think you are wrong,” including his own attorney general. Now, I know there are lots of people out there who are die-hards, Trump voters. Both Buck and I were Trump voters, right? But to me, I look at a lot of the January 6, which is old.

BUCK: Double Trump voters, my man. T squared.

CLAY: (chuckling) So you look at it in that respect, and again all the things they are uncovering are dated and already been written about and talked about for months. But there were a lot of Republicans… If our democracy were truly at stake, there were an awful lot of Republicans — Mike Pence, Bill Barr, certainly a lot of people — Raffensperger down in Georgia, Brian Kemp, lots of people — who said to Trump, “No, sir, even though you’re president, I disagree with your belief here.” And I think the election was rigged. I think that the Democrats stole 2020 based on using covid protocols and everything else. But there were a lot of people who stood up to Trump in the Republican Party.

BUCK: It’s not like the Republicans were saying, “Oh, man, if only QAnon Shaman had had a little more backup, he could have actually overthrown the government!”

CLAY: Yeah, right! (laughs) Yes.

BUCK: Nobody was saying this was something that we thought was gonna succeed or a good idea in the least. If anything, actually — to borrow from Talleyrand — “It was worse than a crime; it was a blunder.”

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Meaning that they broke the law and they dramatically undermined the political right in the process, played right into the hands of the Democrats, which I said as it was actually happening.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: I’m like, this is a nightmare for Republicans going forward ’cause it’s just gonna play right into the narrative of the Democrats use now all the time. And most Republicans, I think, saw that right away. Almost all saw that it was gonna be used against us. But the point here is, even Boris Johnson’s like (impression), “Calm down, man! It’s going to be okay.”

CLAY: I want to hear how these same Democrats who talk about our democracy at stake are going to respond when that Red Wave washes over them in November, because I bet a lot of them are gonna come out and say, “This was a rigging election,” right? You know they’re gonna say it! They said it when Trump won in 2016, they say it whenever they got their ass kicked.

BUCK: Basically, every time the Democrats lose, they cry. Some of them refuse to certify, they come up with some conspiracy theory, and then on the rare occasion — well, it’s not that rare, but whatever — when they win, cheating or not cheating, they say, “It’s criminal to even question how amazing our victory was!” Sore winners and sore losers, Clay. Maybe they’re just unhappy.

CLAY: They’re angry, angry, people and we’re gonna kick their ass in November.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Voicemail on Hunter’s Laptop Proves the President Lied

27 Jun 2022

CLAY: Daily Mail Online, as they continue to investigate Hunter Biden laptop. Remember when those 51 security apparatus officials all said, “Oh, it’s Russia disinformation,” and then you keep seeing more and more of these videos, including one that came out today — it’s getting a lot of attention of Hunter Biden — with one of many escorts that he was paying for. This one, however, is not necessarily salacious in nature at all.

The reason why we’re about to play you this voicemail is because Joe Biden has said that he never discussed the Chinese business interests of his son. That is the official position of Joe Biden as it relates to the millions of dollars that Hunter Biden made from not only Chinese business interests but also Ukrainian business interests. Oh, by the way, the two countries that are right now in the middle of the biggest geopolitical storm in the Biden administration. Will China or will China not invade Taiwan? Kind of a big deal. Ukraine has already been invaded by Russia. Well, Joe Biden wanted to call, and Hunter Biden, we know, is a crackhead, and a lot of the choices he made do not make sense.

BUCK: And by that you mean literally a person who does crack.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Yes.

CLAY: Literally a crackhead. And much-of-what he did was irrational, but he saved everything on his laptop, and then he took his laptop to go get repaired and all this data continues to come out. This is Joe Biden leaving Hunter a voicemail specifically referencing a New York Times story that had to do with Hunter Biden’s involvement with China. Again, Joe Biden on voicemail to Hunter, listen.

CLAY: Okay. So, this is Joe, Buck, specifically discussing a New York Times article about Hunter Biden’s Chinese interests in terms of his business dealings, saying that he thinks the story was good for Hunter; he wants to talk about it with him, directly in contravention to what he has said that he never discussed his business dealings, Hunter’s, with China.

BUCK: “The Times’ 2018 story,” according to the Daily Mail here, “”pointed out CEFC’s chairman Ye Jianming had been arrested in China and his top lieutenant Patrick Ho had been convicted in the US for bribing African officials to help Iran evade oil sanctions. It revealed that Ye had met with Hunter at a Miami hotel in 2017 to discuss ‘a partnership to invest in American infrastructure and energy deals.'”

So, the only reason… I mean, that’s the end of the quote there. The only reason that any Chinese businessmen want to meet with Hunter Biden is because of who his father is. We all understand that. The only reason you would even talk to Hunter Biden — whether you’re a Burisma natural gas company in Ukraine or the CEFC corrupt Chinese energy investment consortium — is that you want to buy access to Biden and, by association, any other very prominent Democrats that are on the Rolodex. That’s what this is all about. To your point, Clay, Biden has clearly lied about this.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: And the Democrats do not care. But I do start to — of course, ’cause lying Democrats, whatever, no big deal. But I do wonder if at some point — and this has been bandied about for a little while — the corruption… They’re holding all this back right now. The Democrat media apparatus is holding back the revelation that the Biden family is selling influence, that Joe is compromised here, has been compromised for a long time. And when you see the way they talked about the Trump family, it was always everything was a criminal.

CLAY: Criminal crime family.

BUCK: Everything was a criminal conspiracy, every business deal that Trump did overseas was illicit, whatever, right? They were constantly going after this stuff. They were insane. This is actually happening. You do wonder if at some point the Democrats recognize that Biden is such an electorally liability for them that this is the pressure point they use on him to convince him to, for health and age reasons, step aside. The only reason I think that we can’t get a sense is, I don’t think they know, meaning the Democrat apparatus, whether they want him to do that yet because they don’t know — they don’t think they know — who his opponent will be.

CLAY: I think that’s correct. I do believe that Biden’s use to Democrats is nonexistent almost. As soon as Republicans take back the House and the Senate, which we think they will do in a little over four months. Now, you’ll still have the lame-duck session, which could be a danger zone, until people get sworn in, in January, because who knows what the Democrats might try and ram through once they actually lose their majority.

Just worth keeping in mind. But what I’m waiting to see happen, Buck, is I am waiting to see a prominent Democrat announce that he or she is willing to challenge Joe Biden. Because that is going to be, I think, the sign that they’re trying to officially shove him off the stage. It could be Gavin Newsom. It could be Hillary Clinton. It could be. It’s probably, certainly not gonna be somebody from inside of his campaign apparatus or certainly his cabinet. But somebody external.

And if I had to put money on it, I would put money on it being California Governor Gavin Newsom as being one of the first people who was willing to officially announce, hey, I’m primarying Joe Biden. He doesn’t get a free ride to another term in office, another nomination, I should say. And therefore, then everybody else has to make a decision and Joe Biden is really put on notice. Because if you remember — and I’m not an expert on this campaign because I was a baby, basically, when it was happening, this is what happened to Jimmy Carter.

Jimmy Carter was sitting president, got elected because of Watergate, I believe there’s an analogy you can make as covid being the Watergate equivalent of Democrats. In other words, there’s no way Joe Biden gets elected president, much like Jimmy Carter unless Watergate, a/k/a, covid of the twenty-first century happens. So, Jimmy Carter’s in office, he gets primaried by Ted Kennedy, if I’m not mistaken, wins his party’s nomination but is mortally wounded.

And then Ronald Reagan comes in, and we get a landslide 1980 Ronald Reagan win, followed by another one in 1984. To me, that is what history is repeating. The question I have is, I think there’s a decent chance now, Buck, that Joe Biden isn’t even going to run to try to get the nomination, and this is the beginning of the end. All of these stories, the dam breaking is starting to flood now with Joe Biden.

BUCK: Let’s just assume for a second — and I just want you to call your shot, okay?

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: Biden doesn’t run, who is the Democrat?

CLAY: I hate him, but I’m starting to think it may be Gavin Newsom.

BUCK: I’m sensing that, too, from Democrats. That’s why I was… I’m sensing they think he is their guy.

CLAY: Gavin Newsom is their guy.

BUCK: Interesting. Interesting.

CLAY: And if it’s Gavin Newsom, then I think the question becomes intriguing for Republicans. We’ve been forecasting this 800-pound gorilla battle between Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis. It’s one thing if it’s Trump-Biden. How does it change if it’s Newsom-Trump or Newsom-DeSantis? Who is the better combatant there? I’m really legitimately terrified of the idea of Gavin Newsom as president because I think he’s genuinely not a good person and also made the worst decisions of any governor during covid and yet was rewarded.

BUCK: He is soulless but politically skilled. Kamala Harris is not politically skilled, for example, as somebody else who — and I think people would assume Hillary is. It’s past her time to do that. I really… You don’t sense the enthusiasm among Democrats for Hillary getting back into it. I don’t see that.

CLAY: No. And if we had DeSantis versus Newsom, for example, it’s really a proxy war for covid response.

BUCK: Yes.

CLAY: Because those are the two most divergent governors who are still in office right now —

BUCK: And about the same age or close to it, different generation for leadership as well. And I do think that a lot of folks feel like some of these Democrats and some of these Republicans who in their eighties —

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: — it’s time for them to spend more time with the grandkids.

CLAY: I think there is an element of that. And so, it could be a generational shift where Gavin Newsom decides he’s gonna challenge Biden in an effort to kick him to the curb. And I don’t know exactly how this is all gonna shake out, but when you’re seeing all of these stories which are being increasingly covered by the CNNs and the MSNBCs and the New York Times and the Washington Posts of the world and you’re asking yourself, “Why? Why are they suddenly the acknowledging the Hunter Biden laptop? Why are they suddenly covering it?” It’s because Biden’s usefulness as a Democrat is essentially all used up and they’re ready to cast him aside. There’s an argument. That’s what I believe is going on right now.

Recent Stories

Stanford Doctor: Covid Lockdown Was a Propaganda Lie

27 Jun 2022

BUCK: The covid reality around us is still something that, depending on where you are in the country, can be just mind-blowing. I flew in. I was in Florida all last week, Clay’s in Florida this week, and the free state of Florida, it’s great. Not a lot of covid madness.

CLAY: Yep.

BUCK: You go around, it’s fine. I was in Miami for part of it, though. You get to Miami and it’s ehhh. You get some masks. You get some people walking around in masks. Okay. But you fly back on the plane to New York City and there’s certainly plenty of people wearing masks and even some double maskers because they take the virus really seriously. The only way to really end all of this is if Democrats feel like it’s too much of a political liability to keep this make-believe game going of, “This was all worth it!

“We should have done this.” The only way to hold them accountable for the horrific decision-making is to go out and basically repudiate every Democrat that went along with this at the ballot box possible. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is one of the brave MDs out there who has been speaking out on this for a long time. He is actually still willing to get up and say, “Hold on a second. We’re not done. A lot of really powerful people lied about all this stuff.”

BUCK: So important, Clay. They lied to everybody.

CLAY: They lied, and Dr. Bhattacharya who you just heard from there along with Dr. Marty Makary, who we had on the show a great deal, they are releasing soon a 9/11-style report demonstrating and detecting and analyzing all of the flaws in our response to covid. And I think the timing on this is going to land like a bombshell in much of the country where suddenly…

You got this guy from Stanford. You got Dr. Makary from Johns Hopkins. What you’re gonna find out is, there was far from a scientific consensus and a lot of really, really smart, educated people — as you know, Buck — believed that we made the wrong decision. Number one criticism that we get, “Oh, you’re not a doctor, you’re not an epidemiologist,” and these guys are. And they’re gonna blow your mind away with a 9/11-style report on it soon.

Recent Stories

Massive Shift: Over 1M Voters Have Switched to GOP in Last Year

27 Jun 2022

CLAY: We talk about how this show is a bastion of sanity in an insane world, and one reason we’re continuing to grow is because so many people in the media are crazy — 1.7 million people, Buck, have changed their party affiliation in the past year, over a million of those people are becoming Republican. Two thirds of that number. These are people who are making the choice to define themselves as either Republicans or Democrats. Two-thirds of the people in the last year have overwhelmingly moved into the Republican camp.

Did this surprise you? This has been, the AP has a huge story up on it, came out this morning, being much talked about as a potential sign of the Red Wave that is coming because the numbers here, suburban very often driving this change, the Republican Party is adding massive numbers of adherents, and Democrats are getting left behind. Two-thirds, a big number, 66% to roughly 33%. Did this surprise you?

BUCK: What would be the counterargument to people doing this, right? If we were to play out a little thought experiment here, you’re walking down the street, you’re talking to your neighbor Phil, he’s walking his Belgian Malinois.

Rita Panahi: Donald Trump's critics may hate him but the joke is on them | Herald SunCLAY: He’s a lib. That’s too fancy of a dog. He’s gonna vote Democrat.

BUCK: Let’s just say, by the way, the Malinois is actually used by Special Forces guys.

CLAY: My bad. It sounds too fancy. You got too much of an accent on that dog.

BUCK: A lot of SF guys. Uh, we put titanium inserts on their teeth.

CLAY: My bad. I apologize. Don’t beat me up when you see me out. You guys are way tougher than me. So the accent on the dog.

BUCK: If I’d said like a chow-chow or something a little more froufrou. Anyway. But walking down the street, you’re talking to your neighbor, Phil, and he’s saying, “Hey, man, I’m really politically activated right now and I think I’m gonna vote for a Republican for the first time.” If you were trying to convince him based on… Now, this is now somebody who’s open-minded enough that they’re even thinking about it.

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: If your job, if you’re a Democrat, and your job was to convince him to vote for Biden and try to help destroy the country in the process, how would you actually do it at this phase? You would be talking about the January 6th insurrection, you’d be saying, women’s right to choose is gone, right? You’d be… I don’t think Phil cares that much. You go down this list of things, and then imagine you’re on the other side and you’re saying, “You know what? Phil? This is brilliant. You should definitely vote Republican because of the following:

“Look at what they’ve done to the price of gas, look at what they’ve done to inflation, look at what they’ve done to the border, look at the Democrat policies on crime and police and prosecutions in cities and towns and counties all across America.” You just have a fuselage at your disposal for at least vote as a rebuke of the Democrat insanity. And yet people say, “Oh, what will Republicans do?” They’ll stop the bleeding, and then they’ll come up with, when they’re in the majority, a plan to enact because we know they can’t enact it while Biden’s president in two years and continue to push and continue to be a break on the lunacy. And I just think we know who wins this argument at this point. If you’re talking about a persuadable, Phil’s going, he’s voting Republican straight down the ticket, Clay.

CLAY: I’ll give you an example of something I did recently that I’ve any done before and I think it’s directly tied to Democrat policies. My wife is working downtown right now in Nashville during the summer, and I told her, “Do not stop for gas after dark anywhere before you get on the interstate.” We stopped for gas recently coming out of a restaurant in Nashville, and I was driving. And I got out of the gas station, and I felt like I was in a Third World country in Nashville, my hometown. Like, it did not feel safe. There was, like, sort of…

And you’re talking to somebody who has lived in downtown Nashville for years, not like I’m somebody who’s always lived in the suburbs. There was a sense of lawlessness. It was a Friday or Saturday night, and I told my wife, and I think there are lots of people having these conversations right now. You might be having it with your kids if you’re a dad, if you’re a granddad, I said, “Make sure the gas tank is full,” and that’s tough in and of itself ’cause you know what it cost me to fill up yesterday, Buck?

BUCK: 120 bucks?

CLAY: $150.

BUCK: Wow.

CLAY: Now, I drive an SUV.

BUCK: You do drive Clay Force One. You’re not messing around.

CLAY: But I’ve got it full of kids in the car and everything else. I pushed it. My wife gets mad about this, by the way, too. I don’t know about you, Buck, when you’re on long drives, I take the tank pretty close to empty before I have to pull off to fill up. I push it.

BUCK: The thing Clay about the scooter is you can always go Flintstone style and go to foot power when you need it.

CLAY: That’s right. I do not have that option in the SUV, but I took it. I filled it, $150 to fill up. So, one, that’s in and of itself its own problem. But I told her, I said, I don’t feel comfortable one of by yourself after dark right now stopping and filling up your gas tank on your way out of town. And I’ve never said that to her in my entire life. And you know my wife. She’s a boxer. For 110 pounds, pound per pound, she would kick my ass but it’s not like she’s unable to defend herself in some way, but I don’t feel comfortable with the lawlessness that I’m seeing. And, by the way, that’s backed up by stats on crime that are occurring in Nashville and many other places.

BUCK: For years, Clay, my job for so many people — and this includes I’ve had many listeners over the years who have said, “I’ve never been in New York before, I’m finally willing to go,” and they’ll say, “Is it safe?” and also, they’ll ask me — and I love it. I give them some restaurant recommendations.

CLAY: You put us in a great Italian place, my wife and I. We were up there two weeks ago.

BUCK: I do know. I spend way too much time in money over the last 20 years eating food in New York City. So anyway.

CLAY: And what was the steakhouse we went to that was so —

BUCK: Keens. A true institution in New York City.

CLAY: Oh, so good.

BUCK: A great spot. But I used to be the one who would always tell people, “It’s fine, it’s safe, you’ll be fine,” and I had total comfort in that. I’d say, “Go walk around Central Park, the Reservoir,” which is like a pond, basically, in the middle of the park, and it has a running track around it. You know, Bloomberg administration, even into the de Blasio administration, you’d see women jogging alone at 10, 11 o’clock at night around there. And that has dissipated. There’s a lot less of it.

The subways are much more seedy and dangerous. I used to tell people, “The subway’s fine! I take the subway all the time.” I spent so many… I can’t even… I took probably hundreds, thousands of subway trips over a span of a few years. And I sit here and I say the subway is not the place of safety where I could say it’s fine for you to come here; don’t worry. I have my own experience in Chicago as a tourist. I went to Chicago to play the tourist for a weekend.

CLAY: Right.

BUCK: And there’s too much crime there, okay? There’s too many shootings. There’s too much stuff happening. It’s too much. It’s not even just the stuff you read about. The shootings that occur, yeah, of course, that’s horrible, that’s the worst kinds of crime that are gonna get a lot attention. But even what you saw, Manhattan Beach, if I were —

CLAY: I got sent the video.

BUCK: If I were loaded with cash and money were no object, Manhattan Beach is a beautiful place. It’s amazing place, right?

CLAY: For people who don’t know, it’s just south of downtown Los Angeles. You’re still in L.A. County, but you’re on the beach. It is absolutely fabulous.

BUCK: And you don’t really have the communist politics you get in Venice Beach and Santa Monica.

CLAY: Correct.

BUCK: So there’s a lot to recommend it. There was a broad daylight jewelry store snatch-and-grab robbery —

CLAY: It’s crazy.

BUCK: — with, it looked like, about eight people all with hooded sweatshirts, masks on, go in with hammers and things. They break. They loot everything in this jewelry store, brought daylight. There’s video of it. You could see people walking around.

CLAY: Three cars idling waiting to be able to jump into. I watched this video.

BUCK: There’s video footage you can see, you can see license plate of the cars that they’re actually fleeing in, by the way —

CLAY: Hopefully, they caught ’em.

BUCK: You would think.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: And yet you’ve seen this, and people say, “Oh, well, it’s jewelry store,” and you know what the left-wing response to this stuff is? “Let’s not overexaggerate this. They have insurance. Do people even need jewelry? Is a jewelry store even something that is important?” That is AOC, people like that, that is their response to these kinds of incidents. And the reality is for everybody on that block now, for every restaurant for every business for the next six months they’re gonna be like, uh, what the heck was that that just occurred? For people who live in that area there’s a psychological damage that also enables the criminality because the criminals feel freer to do this stuff and the law-abiding people go, “Who’s protecting us?”

CLAY: For those who don’t know, the South Bay, that particular neighborhood probably per square foot outside of Malibu probably the most expensive place you could live in Los Angeles. It is highly sought after. There is virtually no crime to speak of. To have an attack like that happen in broad daylight in Manhattan Beach, I know a bunch of people who live in Manhattan Beach. I’ve got a lot of friends because I spent much of my professional career working out at Fox Sports.

They’re in disbelief that that could happen in Manhattan Beach. When crime is on such an upswing where it is right now that it could be occurring like that, it is a, “Holy crap!” moment for many different people and I think emblematic of why so many people are changing their registration from a party perspective to Republican. And this is, again, hard data, 1.7 million people, two-thirds have gone Republican in the last year, switching party affiliation.

Recent Stories

Biden Called It a “Tragedy” in ’06, Now Dems Are Abortion Extremists

27 Jun 2022

BUCK: We’re one year in, and we’re having a great time with all of you, and we are on a mission to save the country. You know, NBD. Save the country, save America, that’s what we’re trying to do here every day with all of you, with your help. The Democrats, on the other hand, they’re looking to find some way to prevent the oncoming speeding bus that is the midterm election that is heading right toward their base of power.

And here you have, for example… The kinds of discussions that are happening right now after the Roe decision are remarkable because so much of it is just histrionics. It’s just not going to happen the way they say it is happening. Kamala Harris, though, who you would think — a female vice president — she’s going to find a way to make this a real moment. Here she is speaking about this as a “health care crisis.”

BUCK: Now, a thing here. One is, when she talks about everyone losing this, that’s just not true. The way that Democrats like Kamala Harris speak about this, it’s as though… They speak of it as though the Supreme Court made abortion illegal across the country. That did not happen. It just said that the states… There is no constitutional right to abortion and the Mississippi 15-week fetal heartbeat law will stand, which means this goes back to the state level, which is where it should have been all along. I think there actually is a strong case that you could make for equal protection and a federal ban on abortion.

But that’s a whole other conversation. That’s a whole other layer to add onto this, effectively that a baby is a life even inside the womb and a life is protected. All this stuff about privacy, you don’t get to abuse your spouse or your child in the home and say, “Oh, I have a constitutional right to privacy.” No, they have a right as well to not be physically assaulted or abused, and that is where the state comes in.

But, Clay, also on the access to “health care” part of this, you can tell they’re uncomfortable with the reality of what it is they are advocating for, because they so rarely speak of it unless they really have to. It’s always about “access to health care,” and just to remind everybody of what an enormous fraud the current president is, Joe Biden — he’s an enormous fraud and always has been — whatever works, whenever he has to say it. Here is Joe Biden back in 2006, and here’s what he said about the abortions that Kamala’s referring to as just “health care.”

BUCK: Now, he’s a Democrat so he’s obviously not pro-life, but notice, Clay, is it — if you had to get, you know, your appendix taken out, is that a tragedy? Why is it a tragedy? I mean, this is where Democrats run into problems, they talk about this as though it’s just health care like any other health care. That’s clearly not true. That’s obviously… This is not the same as having an appendectomy. This is not the same as open heart surgery.

CLAY: What Joe Biden is saying there is what Bill Clinton made the hallmark of Democrats, which was abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare,” and in the third hour of the show, I want to talk a large extent to which there isn’t enough discussion about how radical the Democrat perspective has become, Buck, in that you’ve now got nine-month abortions. People — babies — that are fully formed in the womb, capable of life on their own. If there was a shooting that occurred and the mother and the baby inside of her, the fetus, were to die, then there would be double homicide charges.

So we’ve got a criminal court system now that treats a viable fetus inside of the womb as a person and a Democrat perspective which would say that if you are nine months pregnant and suddenly decide that you want to have an abortion, you can do it. And also on that Kamala Harris clip, Buck, this is not true what Democrats are trying to say in terms of a right being taken away. There are a lot of decisions that the Supreme Court has, upon reflection, gone back and overruled. Dred Scott allowed slavery to exist essentially anywhere in the country.

It was a precipitating factor to the Civil War. The Supreme Court — the Taney Court, for those of you who are 1850s scholars of the Supreme Court — ruled incorrectly that slavery basically had no boundaries. Dred Scott was a slave who was sued for his freedom after being taken to a, quote-unquote, “free state” and argued that slavery basically should exist everywhere. Plessy v. Ferguson, Buck, “separate but equal,” 1896, overruled by Brown v. Board of Education. That was a constitutional right, slavery was, believe it or not, and so was the right to have separate but equal accommodations.

BUCK: Segregation.

CLAY: Segregation was a constitutional right, and Korematsu, which dealt with the imprisonment of Japanese citizens during World War II.

BUCK: American citizens of Japanese ancestry.

CLAY: That’s right, for fear that that they might be connected or rooting for or helping to spy for Japan during World War II. All of these things were upheld by the Supreme Court for decades, later examined and determined to be wrong. So this idea that because a precedent has existed for a long time, it is therefore a right that cannot be overruled, Dred Scott, Plessy v. Ferguson, Korematsu are three easy examples where the Supreme Court said, “You know what? We got those wrong and we have to reconcile the modern era and fix that incorrect precedent.”

BUCK: But I just think it’s so instructive when you hear that Democrats — and I mean from the top and all across the country spectrum of the party and the Democrat media apparatus — they’re just constantly lying about this. They’re lying about the implications of the decision. They lie about the legal reasoning of the decision. And you have all these journalists you may have seen. Some people may have seen this over the weekend, who are going, “Oh, wow. You mean that basically all of Western Europe, for example —

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: — bans abortion after the 12th week?

CLAY: Great point.

BUCK: All of Western Europe — which we think of as socialist and so liberal. They ban abortions in France. So when Macron is say that the Mississippi law, for example, which is at the heart of the Supreme Court case, he’s putting out sympathy, all these things, it’s all just a fraud.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: They’re banning abortions in Europe at a certain level, and that’s what now will be the discussion going on state after state. But to call this health care and pretend like it’s getting a checkup on your tonsils is also just disingenuous, such a lie. There is no health care procedure that is done, that is elected, that people would ever call, including Joe Biden, a tragedy. They know there’s something different, but they lie to people and pretend that it’s all the same, it’s just like having your appendix out.

CLAY: There’s no doubt. And that’s why I flag this because I do think it’s so significant, and you’re hearing hardly anybody mention it. 47 out of 50 nations in Europe draw a line on abortion after 15 weeks. Most of them do it at 12 weeks. And we hear so much about how progressive the European health system is. 47 out of 50, 15-week abortions, they don’t allow them. Most of them draw that line at 12 weeks. It is the Mississippi law.

BUCK: The Democrat Party. So that we’re all clear on this, while they’re running around and saying, “It’s health care, and this is so important, and it’s a right, and it’s a constitutional right,” we actually probably have some of the audio here.

CLAY: We’ve got Stacey Abrams. I’m gonna hit it at the break.

BUCK: Why don’t we come back to that. Let’s finish with that, because what they argue for publicly is barbarous and immoral and there’s no question. We’re not talking about the gray areas or the close calls — no, no, no, no — and we can also talk about that. But when you’re talking about an eighth or nine-month abortion, everybody can see what that is, and the Democrats openly say there’s nothing wrong with that, which is, honestly, psychopathic — honestly — and that’s why the Democrat Party is now in disarray, because it has embraced evil as a talking point, which it’s a pretty tough thing to do.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: We had Herschel Walker in studio. He’s running for Senate against Reverend Raphael Warnock. The week before we had governor of Georgia Brian Kemp on. He is running against Stacey Abrams. And this is important. And there are Republicans out there — and I know they’ve started to deploy this. The vast majority of Americans do not believe that abortion should be legal in the third trimester. This is an incredible expansion of the Roe holding.

That we have had reached the point where 7-, 8-, and 9-month-old babies inside their mothers — third trimester pregnancies — are considered to be viable abortions. There is no argument basically everywhere, even from, quote-unquote, “moderate Democrats” when it comes to abortions taking place in the ninth month of a pregnancy. Something like 90% of Americans do not agree that nine-month pregnancy should be able to have an abortion. Stacey Abrams, who is running for governor of Georgia, was asked about like this, and here was her response.

BUCK: This should be followed up, Buck, and if there were real questions being asked, then Stacey Abrams should be asked; so if a mother who is nine months pregnant and is eager to have a baby is shot and killed and also the baby inside of her dies, do you not believe that should be charged as a murder? Because in my opinion — I think yours, too, Buck — nine-month abortion is murder.

CLAY: Of course. Much earlier than that, it’s murder, and the recognition that everybody should have here is that the same the Democrat Party that will not only state, but will punish you for saying “only women can get pregnant,” will also tell you that a baby in the ninth month is not a human being. They actually reject science. One of the great ironies here, especially in the postcovid era, is that the party of people like that to put #Science all over their social media profiles and think they listen to the doctor, they listen to the data, et cetera, don’t believe that only women can get pregnant. And they come after you if you say otherwise, and they don’t believe that a baby that… I have a friend who just had a baby two months premature.

BUCK: Yep. Baby’s fine, baby’s doing great, fantastic. Also happy, right? Well, the baby was born at, what, 7-1/2 months? This happens all the time. It’s a baby. It’s quite obvious. But Stacey Abrams will sit here and she’ll say that, because the Democrat Party demands that of people like Stacey Abrams, of anybody who’s seeking a leadership role. You have to be willing to advocate for something that is monstrous. It’s not just a little wrong, right? This isn’t about the tax rate, folks. To say that a baby in the ninth month or the third trimester or the second trimester — and, for a lot of people, the first trimester — isn’t a baby is monstrous.

CLAY: And this, by the way, people who otherwise are claiming themselves as moderates. Remember, Tim Ryan, who is running against JD Vance in Ohio for the Senate also came out and said nine-month abortions are okay? And I know there’s a wide variety of opinions on when exactly abortion should and should not be permitted. For instance, I believe life of a mother, rape, incest. I believe in those exemptions.

Others of you have different opinions. But around 90% of people agree that there should be exemptions in rape, life of a mother, incest, and also simultaneously agree there shouldn’t be third trimester abortions, 90%. I mean, those are big numbers, and so the fact that Democrats who are claiming that they are running as moderates like the would-be Senator Ryan in Ohio and Stacey Abrams down in Georgia —

BUCK: Yeah, they’ve been pushing the most extreme positions and demanding taxpayer funding for it and demanding 50 states not only allow this but celebrate this at some level, provide access, that it’s a special right. Clay, they became an extremist party on this issue. They’re an extremist party when it comes to abortion.

CLAY: Which is why I would encourage every Republican to be hitting their opponents with that question. Make them answer. Because they are all saying right now, “Nine-month abortions should be legal,” and that they are in favor of them occurring.

BUCK: Colorado just passed a law stating this. It’s not theoretical. The Colorado law is any reason up to birth.

CLAY: Exactly right: 90% of Americans disagree with it. That is the way to address this, right? That is the way to go after it, I think, if you’re in Republican races, certainly in Ohio, in Georgia, in places that are going to be extremely competitive on the Senate and on the state level as it pertains to governors.

Recent Stories

Jan. 6 Committee to Drop New Surprise Episode Tuesday

27 Jun 2022

CLAY: Breaking news, Buck. “The January 6th committee says they will hold a surprise hearing on Tuesday,” that’s tomorrow, “to present recently obtained evidence.” So for all of you out there who were eagerly awaiting the next chapter of the January 6th hearing, you now have a new chapter to consume: New episode dropping tomorrow.

BUCK: How long before Adam Schiff is on Dancing With the Stars?

CLAY: (laughing) I mean, honestly, this guy is running out of nonsense.

Recent Stories

USA Today Ousts Lib Journo for Saying Pregnant People Are Women

27 Jun 2022

BUCK: You know that the journos are woke. That’s obvious at this point. They are left wing in their thinking, in their biases, and it’s very important to them that they be extremely woke because otherwise they don’t think that their peers will respect them or they just know their peers will oust them, get them fired. Now, sometimes these cases come up, these instances happen, you say, “All right. I get it. Maybe that wasn’t a great tweet,” or, “I wouldn’t have phrased it that way and they were way too harsh and no forgiveness and they boot somebody out.” Clay and I will often take the perspective on this of, “Come on, can’t we all be adults here?” You know, even when Dave Weigel recently got into a bunch of trouble. Weigel, Weigel, I don’t know how to say his name properly —

CLAY: I thought it was a pretty funny joke. Not like it’s groundbreaking, but on Twitter did you laugh when you saw the joke?

BUCK: I can neither confirm or deny. But definitely —

CLAY: I chuckled. I chuckled at the joke. I was like, all right, and, by the way —

BUCK: He retweeted the joke, right? Like no one thought it wasn’t a joke and it wasn’t even his joke. He just retweeted it, which is really the digital media equivalent of laughing at somebody else’s joke, in a sense, right? I mean, it’s like effectively he wrote LOL and got in trouble for that.

CLAY: I’ll tell the joke, because people may not have heard it, and I’m paraphrasing, “Every girl is bi. You just have to figure out if it’s bisexual or bipolar.”

BUCK: I think that’s exactly the joke, by the way. I think you nailed it.

CLAY: Nailed it. All right.

BUCK: That was the joke.

CLAY: If you snickered at all at that joke, you effectively reacted as he did, that’s why I kind of laughed. It wasn’t like it’s the greatest joke that’s ever been told.

BUCK: And at the Washington Post, if you laugh at that joke — if you publicly laugh at that joke in some way — they want you to know that you’re definitely gonna get suspended for a month without pay —

CLAY: A month without pay, Buck.

BUCK: Of course.

CLAY: That is crazy to me like, token that you can be suspended for just for laughing basically at that joke.

BUCK: It’s outrageous, okay. Remember, he’s a big lib and I’m sure Weigel has cheered on a bunch of conservatives getting fired, whatever. But we can have standards even if they don’t or rather we can speak honestly even if they’re just gonna go along with the mob demanding every conservative get destroyed because we are fighting for a free society here and for a better country. But this one even goes further than that one, because now we’re getting to the point where the little commissars, meaning the diversity and inclusion committees at the biggest newsrooms in the country, are able to edit opinion work.

They’re able to edit editorials, meaning to change the wording to suit their political whims, all based on diversity and inclusion. This guy David Mastio has written about this in the New York Post. He was at Gannett, which is like a parent company owns a bunch of these things and USA Today for 25 years. Clay, this was amazing. He responded… Okay, this guy was at USA Today, the editorial board there, editorial page there, for 25 years, and his crime is that when USA Today wrote something about how, “People can get pregnant.” He wrote, “‘People who are pregnant’ are also known as ‘women.’”

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: That is what he did, okay? “‘People who are pregnant are also ‘women,’” as in, if you are pregnant with a child in your uterus, you are a human female, a woman.

CLAY: Biologically, 100% true, and I think we should mention there’s this continue focus on saying “pregnant people,” right? You can’t say pregnant women. You have to say “pregnant people,” right? Okay. This is a battle, the cultural battle that is occurring across the nation in many of these places.

BUCK: Now, he points out that at a lot of papers that are Gannett’s own papers — Indy Star, Enquirer, the Oklahoman — have gotten rid of any effort to even have a conservative. I grew up… I will admit this. I grew up reading the New York Times. I grew up reading as a New Yorker, William Safire and Maureen Dowd, and these were some of the… Now, I found my own columnists as I got a little bit older but that was the household paper. We got delivery of the Times.

But there were right leaning columnists, someone like a William Safire, right? It did exist. You could have this, you would find this. Even Ross Douthat now is kind of an inoffensive conservative over at the New York Times, inoffensive to the left, an erudite fellow but not particularly effective. And then this you have David Mastio telling us that they’re getting rid of this at all these newspapers. Clay, they brought him in because he said — and he had to face the diversity equity and inclusion committee at USA Today, and they fired him, effectively, for saying this.

This is from a Twitter thread.

Also known as biological females, women. That’s Susan Miller, a USA Today news editor

Did you see this, Clay?

CLAY: No, I didn’t see this part.

BUCK: “Casting toilet cleaners in a negative light.” That’s classism, they say.

Anyway, you get the point. I think he actually might have left after they demoted him, and now he’s writing about this. But, Clay, folks, this is straight-up Soviet commissar level stuff at one of the biggest newspaper entities in the country.

CLAY: They think that they are the good guys. And that is so much of what I have to deal with. It sounds pathetic and absurd, and many people out there right now are rolling their eyes over it, but this is what being in the sports media is like today. There is a big article up right now where there are woke journalists upset that the NFL did not follow the lead of the NBA and condemn the Supreme Court decisions in overturning Roe v. Wade and maybe the NFL is going to end up doing it before all is said and done.

But if you’re sitting around right now and you’re thinking to yourself, why in the world should I care what a sports league thinks about a Supreme Court opinion dealing with abortion, you’re not alone. This is the kind of question that I’ve been asking for a long time. And so what — that USA Today infiltration of diversity and inclusion to take over everything, every aspect of their newspaper, is why it’s a slow suicide from the media in general, Buck, because I’ll ask you this.

Who in the world subscribes to the USA Today? Whether you like or dislike the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal or the Washington Post, there are people out there — and I subscribe to both the Times and the Post and the Wall Street Journal ’cause I want to make sure that I read everything that I possibly can. But there are people out there who are strong advocates of those brands. Buck, do you know anyone who’s like, I love the USA Today. There’s nothing I love more than getting my USA Today to be able to read? It’s written for fourth graders. They used to give it by a for free at every hotel. I don’t even know where you can hardly get the USA Today.

BUCK: Can I…? I should point out that this David Mastio fellow is kind of a lunatic lib. Just so everyone understands, he’s not a conservative. So it’s interesting, I think.

CLAY: I think you’re right. When he wrote that Trump wasn’t fit to clean the toilets, I didn’t think, “Classic.” I thought, “This is not a dude who is a big Trump guy.”

BUCK: Oh, it goes more than that. He wrote, “As surely as the terrorists of 9/11 wanted to tear down American democracy in 2001, the terrorists of January 6th wanted to tear down our democracy as well — and unlike the September 11th attackers, they’re going to get another chance for trying to oust…” This was in defense of Liz Cheney in Republican leadership. So the guy’s a big lib.

CLAY: Yep.

BUCK: So I’m not sitting here crying a bunch of big tears for him. That’s not the point. The point is — and I actually think this illustrates it better than people might have even anticipated — even a woke lib is no longer allowed to say, “Only women can get pregnant.” They won’t even give you the slack on that issue. It’s too important to the apparatus to force people to affirm that lie, which it is. It is a lie.

CLAY: It’s a hundred percent a lie. And that’s why first hour I do think one of the themes of the next couple of years is going to Democrats getting their ass kicked in elections and suddenly Democrats, who may still hate Trump and everything else, but are willing to acknowledge that airs a biological difference between men and women and going to be allowed to speak out again because of the toxicity that this diversity and inclusion racket has created.

BUCK: I think a lot of those people who can recognize the difference between men and women are called Hispanics, which is great, meaning they’re gonna be coming to the Republican side, which is fantastic, and they are, I think, done on the diversity, woke politics of this. I think a lot of the folks that have had enough here have seen enough of the true woke leftism are… I mean, remember, Hispanics are overwhelmingly Catholic.

We’re seeing all these indicators they be coming — and, of course, come to the GOP, please. We cannot welcome you warmly enough. And inning that’s one part of this. But also, Clay, a country where you cannot say women are the only people who can get pregnant, therefore a pregnant person is known as a woman is kind of a miserable, awful place in a lot of ways, right? Because if you are not free to speak the truth, you’re not free to say anything.

CLAY: Amen. And there’s also a big difference between saying, “Hey, if you want to pick your gender and you’re an adult, I’m not gonna get wrapped up in what gender choices you’re making.” And asking me to affirm a falsehood as to your gender choice, right? There’s a difference between “I am a woman and I’m deciding to identify as a man,” and saying, “Hey, men can get pregnant.” No, no, no. That is a hundred percent a falsehood. A woman who identifies as a man can get pregnant, but women are the only people in the world who can have babies —

BUCK: If a man can have a baby, this is a true miracle of biology, and we need to know about this ASAP. Show up the man who can have a baby, and I will recant. I will recant.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: But I think, Clay, this is a safe bet. I think if we put a steak bet down against some libs on this one, we’d be going out to eat on their dime.

CLAY: Women are undefeated when it comes to motherhood. Undefeated, can’t beat ’em. They are the champions of pregnancy.

BUCK: Batting a thousand.

CLAY: Batting a thousand, throughout world history.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: Buck, do you remember the argument that we heard a lot when we were kids? Sometimes women would say, “If men were able to get pregnant, then,” right? They would make an argument after that. Your mom probably said it at some point. I imagine my mom said it. My wife said it. Well, Gina Darling, who evidently is a game show host online, has a couple hundred thousand Twitter follows. She was upset about the Roe v. Wade decision, and he tweeted:

So, they came after her; two days later, she followed up. So, everybody out there, just so you know, you can no longer say, if you are a left-winger, “If men were able to” anything, pregnant. It’s transphobic if you try this.

BUCK: You just did a quick scroll through any form of social media on Friday when the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade came down, all of a sudden — and many people noticed this and commented on it — all the Democrats on TV knew what a woman was again. It was a fascinating circumstance. For a while it was, “We don’t know what a a woman is! A woman is a person who identifies as a woman.” No. For Friday’s purposes, a woman was a biological female who, generally speaking at a certain age range, is capable of giving birth to a child. That’s what a woman was for the day, but now they’re gonna have to force themselves to forget that.

CLAY: Gonna be back to anybody can get pregnant, anybody can be a woman. Doesn’t matter whether you have no ovaries, doesn’t matter whether you are a biological female. This is the argument. What’s so funny about this, Buck, is they spent so much time arguing they’re the party of science, and they have completely given it all up.

Recent Stories

#MeToo and Anti-Americanism Lose, Depp and Cruise Win Big

27 Jun 2022

BUCK: Is he one of your all-time favorite movie characters, Clay? Captain Jack Sparrow of the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise is getting quite a payday, apparently.

CLAY: Look, I am a huge proponent on every time they can make a move that everybody from 6 years old to 80-years-old can sit down and enjoy and not feel like it’s preaching to you in any way. And I feel like the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, by and large, Captain Jack Sparrow… Say whatever you want about Johnny Depp’s own personal political predictions, but he bankrupted Amber Heard in a case that I think effectively ended #MeToo.

And now there is a report in the New York Post that he is going to get over $300 million to reprise his role as Captain Jack Sparrow in a couple of new moves to be made going forward, the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, and that they are going to make a Jack Sparrow streaming show as well. Now, in terms of comebacks, Buck? They canceled effectively — everybody did — Johnny Depp from Hollywood after these Amber Heard allegations went public in the Washington Post.

And then Johnny Depp filed a lawsuit that didn’t win for him in England, and then he came back in the United States in Northern Virginia and, again, bankrupted Amber Heard, may have effectively ended her career. They were making a big deal of the fact that she was shopping at the T.J. Maxx recently. She may not be able to afford designer threads anymore. I shop in T.J. Maxx.

BUCK: T.J. Maxx is a great place.

CLAY: I was gonna say.

BUCK: That was a low blow. That’s a nice place.

CLAY: If you are a Hollywood superstar, most of the time you probably do not shop in T.J. Maxx. So, she owes I think $10.3 million, and he’s evidently getting 300 million, and he won the court case.

BUCK: And on top of that did you see that the receipts are in so far, Tom Cruise’s Top Gun remake Maverick or follow-up.

CLAY: Sequel.

BUCK: Yeah, I mean, a sequel. It’s been 30 years, I guess a sequel. A billion dollars at the box office, with a “B,” folks, a billion dollars. Tom Cruise’s most successful box office venture ever which, again, it means if you make movies that allow people to connect and enjoy themselves and come together, not only will they pay for it, they’ll go to the theater! They still do want that experience. They just don’t want to be lectured about how awful America is all the time.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: A little less of that might go a long way, it turns out.

CLAY: Is there a desperate demand right now in America — and if you are a Republican running for office, I’m telling you, people crave it — for “America is awesome” content. America is the greatest country in the world. The Democrats are running as if America is the worst country in the world. That is their perspective. Republicans should be punching back in a aggressive way, and I think the Maverick success epitomizes that, Buck.

BUCK: It’s gonna be quite a fall, my friends. We also need to win back the right to say things that are true. When you hear this story from a former editor of USA Today who got fired… We gotta break this down for you coming up because the answer to the question who can get pregnant can get you fired unless you say the wrong thing.

Recent Stories

The Wisdom of Ronald Reagan on the Sanctity of Life

27 Jun 2022

PRESIDENT REAGAN: I think all of us should have a respect for innocent life. With regard to the freedom of the individual for choice with regard to abortion, there’s one individual (chuckles) who’s not being considered at all. That’s the one who’s being aborted, and I’ve noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born. … And yet our opponents tell us not to interfere with abortion, they tell us not to “impose our morality” on those who wish to allow or to participate in the taking of the life of infants before birth. Yet no one calls it “imposing morality” to prohibit the taking of life after a child is born. We’re told about a woman’s right to control her own body, but doesn’t the unborn child have a higher right — and that is to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?

BUCK: Words of Ronald Reagan there sounding like things we need to hear now. Welcome back to Clay and Buck. Look, it was a good weekend for America. A lot of people are really upset but they’re wrong. Overall, this is something that should be celebrated, and everybody should feel good. There is a new day here, a dawning that is occurring in the country — or dawn is occurring — and we are approaching an election that will allow the American people to really speak, Clay, for the first time on the true results of lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

The massive spending, the effective Modern Monetary Theory lunacy of the Democrats in the Biden administration. This is the way this system is actually supposed to work, and it took a long time to get rid of one of the worst Supreme Court decisions of all time, but finally that has happened, and so people should feel good about things. All is not lost. We are moving in the right direction. The correction is happening right now, and we just have to stay focused and stay on it.

Recent Stories

The Democrat Party Loses Its Mind Over Roe Reversal

27 Jun 2022

CLAY: We’re talking about the danger that is faced by Supreme Court justices, also the overwhelming amount of success that they have had on the conservative wing of the court, probably the most consequential in terms of Supreme Court rulings maybe in many of our lives — I think that’s fair to say — maybe in most of our lives. And as a result, the left wing has become very angry, and I just want to play two of these cuts. The person that the coming in for the most attack is Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

If you haven’t heard both of these things, the first one is Lori Lightfoot. She is the awful mayor of Chicago. By the way, Citadel announced that they were leaving Chicago. Big private equity hedge fund that has been based in Chicago for 30 years, they are relocating to Miami. The reason given was the failure of the city of Chicago to protect its people, which is the most basic responsibility of any mayor. Well, Lori Lightfoot was at a rally over the weekend, stepped on the stage, and had this to say. We had to bleep her out. I think you’ll be able to hear the audio, but it is not an encouraging word being delivered towards Clarence Thomas. Listen.

CLAY: So that is Lori Lightfoot. I want to play that one for everybody. Buck, I can’t remember… You may be able to recall this. I don’t remember an elected official at an office level like mayor the Chicago, which you may remember is the third biggest city in the United States, expletive-ing a sitting Supreme Court justice like she did at a public rally. Can you remember Democrat or Republican, anything like that where someone…? Again, you may think Lori Lightfoot is an imbecile — and I do, and I bet a lot of you do, certainly if you live in Chicago you do.

BUCK: Me too.

CLAY: But I can’t recall that ever occurring. Can you remember anything like this?

BUCK: Clay, the libs are coming complete unhinged over this. Lightfoot, so many of them, they’re just completely melting down. And there many, many layers to this. Part of it is they’ve been lied to for so long about this that they really just can’t compute, or they can’t manage to reason through, the very clear reality of what has actually happened here, and when people are saying it’s an activist Supreme Court… For example, Alan Dershowitz. We have a cut of him speaking. We can maybe get that later, or not. Sometimes, he’s right. Sometimes, he’s really wrong.

I debated him on guns on CNN, and I’ll never forget this. I was like, “You know nothing.” It was shocking. Alan Dershowitz on the issue of guns is wildly ignorant. He doesn’t know anything. He doesn’t know the stats, he doesn’t know the law, he doesn’t know anything, but he’s used to just kind of holding court and everyone listens. He says this is an activist Supreme Court. I didn’t even go to law school, but I can read pretty well, and I understand how the jurisprudence that led up to this has been formed over many, many years.

And I would just say, if this was an activist Supreme Court, they wouldn’t have said, “There’s no constitutional right.” They wouldn’t have just said, rather, “There’s no constitutional right to abortion,” which is obvious and everyone knows it and every good lawyer admits it. They would have said, “Under equal protection, that’s a life in the womb. You have to protect it from a mandatory federal level.” A truly sweeping decision would have been the Supreme Court saying, “A life in the womb is a life worthy of protection from the state at the federal level,” never mind at the state level.

They didn’t do that. So people are being lied to right now. “This is a radical, extreme, crazy court!” No, this is a court that says, “Words have meaning. The words in the Constitution do not actually amount to a federal right to abortion.” If you can read English, you can understand that, and now they have to actually make their case state by state as to why it should be happening, and it is kind of troubling. There are a number of companies — I’m trying to think of them.

A number of companies, Dick’s Sporting Goods I think is one of them — which, who knew? I didn’t realize they’re woke. A bunch of… Google, clearly, and Disney says they’re gonna give women $4,000 for travel expenses to go get an abortion. Some people are noting, what are the maternity leave policies at these places? Four thousand dollars to go travel somewhere? Are these companies much more comfortable paying for women to get abortions instead of women actually becoming mothers who are their employees? What message are they sending?

CLAY: It is a great question. If you think about it from a purely diabolical perspective, paying someone to travel to a different state and have an abortion ensures that they continue working for you and don’t need to take maternity leave, right? Purely from a corporate perspective, it seems quite craven, because they’re arguing that this is a benefit they are providing. But arguably the group that benefits the most is the company because the woman doesn’t, then, have a baby and comes directly back to work.

And to your point, Buck, how do you reconcile that with what might otherwise be the maternity leave policies that are being put in place by these institutions? And the craziness, by the way… I don’t know where The View is broadcasting from, but I wanted to hit this too because Lori Lightfoot going after Clarence Thomas… It’s probably not gonna surprise you, Buck, or anybody out there listening since The View is the dumbest outlet for media in the entire country that Whoopi Goldberg had really significant thoughts on Clarence Thomas, and they were not particularly intelligent. But I just want you to hear. Whoopi Goldberg is upset that Clarence Thomas has a white wife. And she wants everybody to know that somebody’s gonna be coming after their marriage. Listen.

BUCK: There’s so much wrong there that where do you even start?

CLAY: The cheering! The cheering from her audience.

BUCK: It’s the dumbest… Honestly, it’s not just the dumbest audience in television. I often think The View audience is the dumbest collection of human beings that you could find almost anywhere in the country. It’s amazing that they pull them together with such regularity. They never grow, no matter how stupid The View hosts may grow on any issue. And, by the way, did you hear? Since we’re talking The View — I don’t want to spend too much time on this — here is Ana Navarro, who’s off… I don’t think she’s permanent. She’s not a permanent host, or is she? I can’t keep up. Is she now? I don’t know. She’s on The View a lot as a host. This was really jaw-dropping for a lot of people to hear.

BUCK: Clay, here is a TV host with a substantial following who is making the case on TV — she has a brother who is special needs — that essentially special needs people are too much of a burden on their own families so there needs to be more access to abortion. It was honestly one of the most grotesque things I’ve heard on television in a very long time. But this is the mentality. Special needs family members are an inconvenience; therefore, we must have abortion.

This is the argument she is making on television. Everyone needs to understand that’s exactly what she’s saying. She’s not saying, by the way, they should they get more resources. Should people get more help? Absolutely now is the time and the pro-life movement has already mobilized in this regard for adoptions, for crisis pregnancies. Help people within help families, provide more assistance. It’s on the communities to step up. But make abortion more acceptable because there are Down Syndrome babies? The word “evil” creeps into the conversation very quickly.

CLAY: It’s eugenics. Let’s be honest about what she’s effectively arguing there. The amount of crazy that this has unleashed and will continue to unleash, I think the only way Democrats tamp down their crazy is by a legitimate ass kicking, the Red Wave in 2022 followed by another Red Wave in 2024. I think that’s the only element of moral clarity that they will understand is reconciling their positions with destruction.

BUCK: This is a recurring theme here but, I mean, the Democrat Party at its base, at its core, has lost its mind, folks, okay? They make arguments that are completely deluded and disconnected from reality, and we must make those arguments. We could sit here and talk about gender ideology, we could talk about all these different things where they are demanding the affirmation of what is obviously untrue. And even some Democrats…

Even Bill Maher now, each week, is like, “Hey, Democrats stop being crazy. You’re gonna lose power, which is the thing that matters to you the most.” It’s not like we’re the only people even on the right. Obviously a lot of folks are obviously making this argument. Even some Democrats are realizing, “Oh, my gosh. The party has gone crazy,” and they have. They’ve gone too far, they are too radical, they think AOC is smart, they have completely lost their minds.

CLAY: No doubt. And only with the crystallization of defeat will many of those Democrats feel capable of speaking and trying to take back control of their party.

Recent Stories