×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Another Shocking Murder Rocks NYC: Young Mom Shot Dead

30 Jun 2022

BUCK: First, I was really struck last night by the headlines about what happened on the Upper East Side. As you know, I’m here in New York City. I live in Midtown Manhattan. I grew up on the East Side and the Upper East Side is probably the safest neighborhood. It’s also generally an expensive neighborhood, not all of it is hyper-expensive, but a lot of it is. But it’s a place you don’t see shootings. It’s a place you don’t really see much in the way of violent crime even when the city is having a bad time of it, and there was a mother with her baby walking the baby in a stroller.

The mother was going for a walk and a gunman in a hooded sweatshirt came up behind her and executed her with a gunshot wound to the back of the head — 95th Street and Lexington Avenue, for those of you who live in New York City — and this immediately sent a shock wave through the city because this is exactly the kind of thing that gets everyone’s attention, as this is how far the security situation, law and order has deteriorated in a neighborhood like the Upper East Side in New York, where you’re generally not seeing as much violent crime: You have an execution in a busy intersection of a mother with a baby.

Clay, Eric Adams came out last night. He actually went to the scene of the shooting right away, so the mayor knew that this was a moment that going to really obviously upset a lot of people, upset everyone in New York and around the country. But also he knew that there were political ramifications from this kind of an incident, and here’s my basic theory, and we can go through it.

My basic theory, Clay, is we all know what would actually bring the crime levels down. We actually in New York City ran the experiment in the nineties. We know what needs to be done. Democrats for ideological reasons refuse to do it, they just refuse to do it. They focus on guns. The focus was not singularly on guns when they turned New York around starting in 1990, the year 2000. This is where we are now, and this is happening in cities all over the country.

CLAY: New York went from — correct me if I’m wrong, Buck — around 2,000 murders a year all the way down to 300. Giuliani, when he took over, you were a kid; it was around 2,000 murders. New York was not a safe place to be. And I think the number fell all the way to like 300.

BUCK: Under 300. It was 2,245 in 1990 and got to 292 in 2017.

CLAY: Okay. So an unbelievable success story in terms of making the streets safer for everyone. These are the kinds of stories that crystallize fear for many people because if someone is killed… Most deaths, most murders, as many of you know — almost all of you know — probably, involve people that you know. That is, random acts of vibrancy are rare. What has become very commonplace, Buck, suddenly in New York City is guys on the subway going to work and somebody shoots him and he dies and he didn’t know that guy at all. This is the Hispanic guy did who worked at Goldman Sachs. That was a viral story.

BUCK: He was a victim. He was executed. Yes.

CLAY: An Asian woman gets shoved directly in front of a subway car as she’s standing waiting to go I think to yoga class one morning in New York City as well. Now a mom, out pushing her baby in a stroller, gets executed. The details of who this guy was and what exactly might have been behind it, we still don’t know. But if this was a truly random act of violence — which, Buck, it appears, at least early on, that it was a random act of violence — everyone immediately thinks for all three of those stories, “That could have been me.”

It’s different when you’re involved in a criminal underworld drug trade. It’s different when someone that you know takes a violent act against you. But truly random acts of violence crystallize the killing fields that many of the cities and states in our country have suddenly become in the wake of the George Floyd prostitute and the BLM riots. Let’s be honest. That’s when it started it.

BUCK: That’s the absolutely critical point.

CLAY: Yep.

BUCK: Why did this all happen? Why is the murder rate in New York City up 60% in four years, especially given that the trend was down, down, down for over 20 years, decades?

CLAY: Decades.

BUCK: All of a sudden, it’s up 60% in less than four years? The murder rate in 2021, there were 488 murders here. Now, there are other cities like Baltimore that are much smaller with considerably higher murder rates.

CLAY: Atlanta.

BUCK: Right. But New York because it’s the biggest city and, honestly, the biggest crime turnaround miracles is — for people who want to look at the data, who want to look at what happened — a very indicator of what’s gone on here. And it is because of, the George Floyd riots, the progressive prosecutor movement, and the Democrat Party embracing this ideology of, “We just have to enforce fewer criminal laws.”

“The criminal justice system is racist,” this is the mainstream Democrat belief and talking point, “and therefore the way to deal with the racism that they assess is in the system is to just enforce fewer criminal laws, send people to prison for less time, let people out earlier, all of it. And when you look at New York, it is just step by step, it’s like de Blasio and now Adams — although Adams is beginning to turn it around — was running a “How do I ruin this city?” program.

They got rid of the plainclothes police unit, Clay, back in 2015. Why? Well, remember this. June 15, 2020: “The New York police commissioner announced on Monday he was disbanding the police department anti-crime unit plainclothes team that target violent time and had been involved in some of the city’s most notorious police shootings.” You know what the notorious police shooting is they always point to? Amadou Diallo, which was a bad incident, it was a mistake, but they thought he had a gun. That was in 1999.

CLAY: Yeah, I remember that story.

BUCK: Whenever the journos write about this, it’s, “Well, the plainclothes unit…” This is in 2020! “The plainclothes unit, man, they were in some bad shoots in, like, 1999.” These people, the journos, the Democrats, the police commissioner under the de Blasio administration — and now what we see with the progressive prosecutor, DA Bragg, and Mayor Adams — they’re reckless and they’re wrong and they just don’t want to stop. So he’s fixating on guns. Clay, the number of gun… I’ve seen estimates that there are over a million guns in circulation in New York City. They take about 10,000 guns a year off the streets.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: “Oh, but if they focus on the guns they’re really gonna solve the problem.” It’s idiocy. It’s like there’s a lack of ability to do the basic math.

CLAY: They also did away with “stop, question, and frisk,” as you well know, which was also incredibly important in terms of making people think, “Hey, make sure I shouldn’t have a gun with on me when I’m walking around in a high-crime area because the police can stop and talk to me and then judge me based on my reaction to some questions, whether or not I might be carrying a gun.” And, unfortunately, Buck, the overwhelming number of the victims of these massive increases in murders have been black, right?

And if black lives truly matter, where does BLM show up when all of these deaths are occurring in inner cities? They’re nonexistent! They are not in any way involved. They show up if a white police officer is involved in any sort of allegations of impropriety. But when you have killing fields in our inner cities — and overwhelmingly young kids are the victims — they don’t say a word. And the media that shows up to cover all these BLM protests and talks about how awful police are, they don’t say a word, either. They barely even mention these deaths, and it takes these sort of viral, anecdotal, out-of-nowhere random acts of violence to even cut through and personify what’s going on in our cities right now.

BUCK: They got rid of “stop, question, and frisk.” A judge here just decided that it was unconstitutional. They got rid of the plainclothes unit. They changed as many police procedures as they could and a hyperfocus on restraint holds and all these things to make the cops think, “Well, if I have to wrestle somebody who could go for my gun and kill me while I’m on the job, I better be careful that I don’t put my elbow in the wrong place or else I’m going to end up in prison as the police officer.” They cut the NYPD budget by a billion dollars.

The fascinating thing, Clay, is at the same time that we’re hearing — and this is true in city after city. In New York, San Francisco, Philadelphia, L.A., they talk about lowering gun crime and going after the illegal guns. Arrests are way up for illegal gun possession in New York City. Prosecutions, somehow, are way down. And this is the phenomenon that you see that’s just enraging. People who do terrible things and think a lot of the high-profile cases in any city across the country, they kill somebody out of nowhere, and we find out they’ve been arrested 30 times.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: They’ve been arrested 70 times. There was somebody in New York City just got his 100th shoplifting arrest! It was like the lib the media wanted to give him some kind of a prize. “Look at him! He’s gotten away with it a hundred times.” This is a mind-set. This is an ideology the Democrats have pushed for. It’s rooted in virtue signaling. It’s rooted in their sense of guilt. It’s rooted in their belief that somehow you don’t have to give cops…

Here. Mayor Adams has neighborhood safety teams. This is what he said in response to this. Clay, listen to how they describe this. “Neighborhood safety teams, the City of New York,” these are police squads, “intensively trained in minimal force techniques, advanced tactics, car stop, de-escalation is essential to all of it.” Now, de-escalation is important. But we’re actually trying to go after bad guys here and the cops have to feel supported and not be told that they’re basically social workers who happen to have a gun.

CLAY: Being concerned that you’re being too tough on criminals is a luxury of a low-crime environment. That’s where we got. We got convinced that crime was not a major issue and we allowed it to creep back up, and then the George Floyd BLM protests put this all on steroids and the numbers now… It’s impossible to argue otherwise. You go look in May of 2020, in June of 2020. We basically suddenly went on a rocket ship of violent crime exploding.

Because we attacked our police officers, told them they couldn’t do their jobs and then that combined with the soft-on-crime environment. And I’m gonna, when we come back, Buck… I want to share an example of how celebrities have helped to fuel the environment of this awfulness, LeBron James in particular. I’ll tell you about something that happened in Akron that I bet almost none of you have even heard of.

BUCK: Yeah, and I just want to add to this as just in the background: We keep talking about this because the Democrats aren’t changing course, really. They’re just hoping this goes away, and we’re months away from an opportunity to actually have some accountability for these bad ideas.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: They have ruined cities, folks. Do you want to hold them accountable?

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

ADAMS: It doesn’t matter if you are on the Upper East Side or East New York, Brooklyn. The oversaturation of guns and dangerous people that repeatedly leave our criminal justice system to continue actions like this, it is what’s making the New York City Police Department and other law enforcement agencies here in New York — and across the country — difficult to fight this issue.

BUCK: Welcome back to Clay and Buck. That was the mayor of New York, Eric Adams. It’s always the guns. Although he did say something, I believe, there about dangerous people who have the guns, which is getting closer to the issue here, which is criminals and arresting, prosecuting, and imprisoning those who are a threat to their fellow human beings and who break the law. We have an update for you on that.

The reason the mayor is speaking out on this is because of this execution style shooting on the Upper East Side of Manhattan last night. It was a domestic violence the incident the police are now saying. Here’s what we know according to the New York Post: “The young mom who was shot and killed while pushing her 3-month-old baby in a stroller on the Upper East Side was a domestic violence victim … identified by her mother as 20-year-old Azsia Johnson … she had been planning on meeting her infant’s dad on Wednesday night, according to the sources. 

“‘She was targeted. It was a close head shot…’” the police said, and when speaking to the family what they found out was that this was a long-standing threat against this woman from this individual that’s now the prime suspect. Following the altercation … the ex-boyfriend continued stalking and harassing her daughter,” according to her mother. “They called police for help, but he was not arrested… ‘We called the precinct numerous times to tell the (domestic violence) unit that he was stalking and harrowing her.

“‘Even (though) they knew what apartment he lived in, they failed to apprehend and arrest him,’” according to the mother of the victim, and then her quote here, Clay. “The city failed to protect my daughter.” That’s how a lot of people feel right now about what this city’s insufficient law enforcement environment is. They’re not doing what is necessary to keep people safe at a level that we’ve seen in the past. No one’s expecting perfection, but things have gotten out of hand. I know there’s this case.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

30 Jun 2022

NBC News: Supreme Court curbs EPA’s power to limit greenhouse gas emissions
CNN: Supreme Court issues major rulings on climate and immigration
CNN: At noon, Stephen Breyer will retire from the court and help swear in Ketanji Brown Jackson
CBS News: Supreme Court says Biden can end “Remain in Mexico” rule for asylum-seekers
Washington Post: Russian forces withdraw from Ukraine’s Snake Island
Fox News: Cornell University removes Gettysburg Address, Lincoln bust from library after alleged complaint
Yahoo News: Cheney: Trump’s Jan. 6 actions ‘more threatening than we could have imagined’
Bloomberg: Putin Is Pushing Germany’s Economy to the Breaking Point
SciTechDaily: American Heart Association: Sleep Duration Is Essential Component for Heart and Brain Health
Gizmodo: The U.S. Is Rolling Out Monkeypox Vaccines to the Public
NY Times: Woman Is Fatally Shot While Pushing Baby in Stroller on Upper East Side
NBC News: Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to New York vaccine mandate for health care workers
NBC News: FDA backs changing Covid booster shots to target most recent omicron subvariants
NY Post: Young mom shot dead on Upper East Side victim of domestic violence: cops
Supreme Court: West Virginia v. EPA
Supreme Court: Biden v. Texas
Daily Mail: Biden says he would BACK killing the filibuster to codify abortion and insists ‘I’m the president… that makes me the best messenger’ on Roe v. Wade: Accuses Supreme Court of ‘outrageous behavior’ and ‘destabilizing’ the U.S.
Fox News: Supreme Court hands Biden victory, allows end to ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy
AP: Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissions
OutKick: AUTOPSY REVEALS OHIO TEEN MURDERED IN LEBRON JAMES’ SCHOOL PARKING LOT SUFFERED BARBARIC DEATH

Recent Stories

Gallup Data: Just 26% of Democrats Are Proud to Be Americans

29 Jun 2022

BUCK: Proud to be an American, which, of course, makes me think of the song, right? But —

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: — the question proud to be an American, there’s some data out there, this may not shock you, but there seems to be a correlation between being on your eighth vaccine shot, your sixth Ukraine flag in your Facebook profile, ownership of a lot of cats — no offense, Clay — and not necessarily being a big fan of being an American based on the data.

I’m just gonna put that out there. I have an inclination that there are a lot of people on the left that don’t like it.

CLAY: Yeah. Preview here. In 2003, 65% of Democrats were proud to be American. Now, this is during the George W. Bush administration. Sixty-five percent.

Recently — this is according to Gallup — just 26% of Democrats are proud to be American.

BUCK: I will say that is actually even lower… I thought it would be low, but I did think it would at least be in the thirties.

CLAY: So — and what’s wild about this, Buck, 2013 — now, this is during the Biden — during the Obama administration. But 56% of Democrats were proud to be Americans. Fifty-six percent.

So in the space of basically nine years — and they’re in control of both sides of government, right? They’re in control of the House, the Senate, and the White House. Usually, there is some correlation about looking at this chart over the last 20-some-odd years, when your party is in power, you feel better about America, which makes some sense, if you think about the White House and the president being somebody that you voted for and you’re happy.

But the numbers on Republicans are intriguing, too. As we get ready for July 4th, I think we could open up the phone calls in maybe the Thursday or Friday edition of the program and have a deeper discussion about this and where we’re going as a country when one political party, 26% of them, that means three out of four are not proud to be American if they are Democrat.

BUCK: I think as an ideology, Democrats embrace a degree of misery and victimhood and then it gets exacerbated, they magnify it because when people are already prone to think of themselves that way, that’s how you reach them, right?

It’s not just — you’re upset about things, you think everything’s unfair, you know, you gonna go cry about it? It’s even worse than you think. This country is even more oppressive, sexist, racist, imperialist, than you, the left, think it is. It’s a way of playing to people’s biases and also controlling them because you’re just leaning in even further with their delusion.

Clay, I’d be willing to argue — I’d be willing to bet — I don’t know if they have data on this — but to your point about party affiliation, party in power, and feelings about the country, I bet you conservatives, Republicans, conservatives are much more likely to still love America when their party’s not in power than Democrats are.

CLAY: That is a very strong argument based on this data from Gallup. When you get to 26% — and again I would just point out that as recently as seven, eight years ago a majority of Democrats were very proud to be Americans.

What has occurred that has led to that disaster? I think it’s a really interesting debate we should have and discussion we should have as we roll in to July 4th weekend.

Recent Stories

Is a Crowded GOP Primary Better for Trump?

29 Jun 2022

CLAY: We have talked about the disaster that is Joe Biden. We have talked about the disaster that is Kamala Harris, Mayor Pete, Hillary Clinton, whoever you want to insert as the potential Democrat candidate in 2024, the bench is very slim. There are not a lot of great options. Flip side. January 6th… Let’s be honest. As Buck and I have told you for a long time, is really just about trying to make Donald Trump not a viable 2024 candidate. Now, I actually think January 6th makes him far more likely to run because he wants to be able to fire back at all of his critics.

But there are right now a lot of Republicans doing the groundwork, doing all the behind-the-scenes details to get ready to be able to run themselves. And I was reading this morning, Buck, Washington Post has a monster profile piece on Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin and the fact that he just went up to New York City to raise money from some of the biggest money Republican supporters in New York, where we were, by the way, at the same time.

Youngkin is aggressively exploring a potential run for president. We know and have talked about the fact that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is also exploring his own run, and interestingly — and we’ll play the audio for you on this in a little bit — Joe Rogan came out and said that he thinks that Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida could be a good option as well. Mike Pompeo seems like he is gonna run. I think it’s fair to say Mike Pence is gonna run. All of this, Buck, leads to an interesting question.

Are there actually going to be so many Republicans running that Trump is going to think twice about it? Or the more Republicans that run, is it actually better for Trump because we know that whatever cadre of the Republican Party, let’s say, are die-hard MAGA people and let’s say it’s a third of all Republican voters. I’m just tossing out a number. Could be higher. Could be lower. Is that better for Trump? In other words, the more people who decide to jump in in 2024, do you think that impacts the way that Trump himself, Buck, is thinking about the idea of running and/or as more people running, does it make him maybe even more likely because his path to nomination could be even easier.

BUCK: If you look at the 2015-2016 period and who got into the Republican Party primary there —

CLAY: Yeah, it was 19, I think.

BUCK: That’s right, 19. There was 19 candidates, and Trump very early on — and this is often I think forgotten. It should get more attention. Trump jumped out ahead of everybody in terms of an individual level of support as soon as he took immigration and ran with it and build the wall and we’re gonna make Mexico pay for it and we’re gonna deport illegal immigrants who come here without respect for our laws. That was the issue that really, yeah, of course Trump, super well known, all of that.

But it was on immigration more than any other issue that he separated himself from the rest of the field. If you look at how that played out, I think you’d have to come away believing — you can never prove this — that it was helpful to then Donald Trump, now president or former president Trump, that you had so many different candidates. This time around, Clay, I just think there are so many possibilities here, I think there are so many what-ifs, that it’s really hard to get a sense of it. There are going to be people on the Republican side who just want to up their national profile — and, by the way, I don’t say this disparagingly.

There are some candidates for whom running is the opportunity to maybe get their perspective as a conservative, as a Republican heard. For example, I would say someone like Senator Rand Paul, who we’ve had on the show many times, never came close, really, in the polls to winning the Republican nomination, but he was a guy who every time he was on stage I’m like, “I’m glad that Senator Paul is there being heard on these issues. I’m glad the party has somebody with his perspective there.”

So I don’t say, “Oh, they’re just gonna run. They’re not gonna win.” There are some other people who want to up their speaking fees and get the book deals, and I’m a capitalist. I’m not hating on that. But, you know, they’re gonna run a big book tour or they’re gonna go on the big speaking tour and that’s what it’s all about. But you’re gonna… One thing I do know — I mean, instead of just doing all the possibilities and the what-ifs, one thing I do know — is if you look at the Republican bench of possible contenders, you’ve got really serious people.

CLAY: It’s deep. It’s deep.

BUCK: I’m not trying to upset anybody who is die-hard, Trump is gonna run again and Trump is gonna win again. That could well happen and that will be great. But if you look at the other people on the Republican bench just to give a strength of the Republican Party, Ron DeSantis obviously has practically worked a miracle in the state of Florida — one, as a New Yorker who used to escape to Florida in the pandemic I feel very personally attached to. Glenn Youngkin is doing a really good job in Virginia. There’s a whole bunch of people, I know. A lot of Ted Cruz supporters in our audience who would love to see him run again, right?

CLAY: Tim Scott. A lot of people want Tim Scott.

BUCK: Tim Scott.

CLAY: A lot of people want Nikki Haley. There’s a long list.

BUCK: These are all serious people who I think would do a good job. Just a question of who would do the best job and who would win against whoever the Democrat is. We don’t even know who the Democrat is, of course, really.

CLAY: I think one reason you’re seeing so many people put their name in the hat — you’re right — because there are some people who say maybe I’ve got a 2% chance of being the nominee and they just decide, “I could at least elevate my profile.” The Democrats’ bench is so weak and their potential candidate is so weak. I think it feels a little bit… One of my buddies made this analogy. He said the Republicans right now are like the SEC in college football. Whoever comes out of the SEC is probably gonna win the national championship and then the Democrats are just gonna toss up somebody who gets wrecked in that championship.

BUCK: We’re a year into this show, and I understand that analogy.

CLAY: You got that analogy.

BUCK: I got it, baby. I’m locked in! SEC football, I know some things.

CLAY: I apologize to all the Big Ten listeners out there and all the Big 12 and PAC-12 and ACC fan bases. But in general, the SEC right now is, to me, akin to the Republican presidential primary candidates. The best team out of the SEC is gonna run roughshod over whoever the Democrats put up, which is the best team in the rest of the country. This is Joe Rogan. I referenced this and said we would hear it. Here is Joe Rogan on his podcast — it’s one of the most popular podcasts in the world — discussing with Gina Carano from The Daily Wire, fired at the Mandalorian for not having the right opinions.

BUCK: She’s a top MMA fighter for a while, right?

CLAY: Yeah, as well. Here they are discussing the idea of Ron DeSantis. Listen.

BUCK: I’m really happy to hear Joe Rogan say that because Ron DeSantis was correct about how he dealt with covid in Florida. There is no good-faith argument to be had against him based on the numbers. The numbers are in. The data is in. It’s like we ran a race and Ron DeSantis was the first one across the finish tape. So there’s that. But also, just to point it out, Ron DeSantis is in a great spot. But after last week as well, Donald Trump, most pro-life president in history. And with those judges, not only do we have that Roe v. Wade decision, we’re gonna have two good decisions coming down most likely, I’m assuming tomorrow.

CLAY: This fall.

BUCK: We may see the end of affirmative action. I think that’s gonna happen this fall. So it’s been a big… It’s been a big month for Trump, and I think it’s been a big first couple of quarters for Governor DeSantis when you look at the growth in Florida. So I’m just trying to say, “Man, we look at our side when we’re sitting here talking about it and we’re comparing awesomeness,” and look at their side, where it’s like, “Yeah, maybe. I don’t know. Maybe they’re gonna have who? Pete Buttigieg?”

CLAY: Yeah. The View said the dream candidate and team was Kamala Harris and Mayor Pete.

BUCK: That would be awesome. I actually —

CLAY: And I think all of you out there… (laughing) I can barely say it with a straight face.

BUCK: Can we donate to the Mayor Pete-Kamala super PAC? ‘Cause we need get that going.

CLAY: Buck, they spent a lot of money in Colorado and Illinois, Democrats did, trying to pick their opponents. It failed in Colorado, may have won in Illinois. But I kind of think maybe they bought off something they don’t want to really be taking on. But if right now I could choose, if I could pencil in Kamala Harris, president; Mayor Pete, vice president, I would sign up to run any Republican we just mentioned against that ticket.

And just circling back around on how we started this, I think January 6th is blowing up in Democrats’ faces. They thought that they were going to remove Donald Trump from the 2024 contender list. I think what they’re doing is actually guaranteeing that he run because they’re infuriating him and not letting him just kind of ride off into the sunset. They’re trying to put him in jail, and if you’re Donald Trump, you want the vindication. “I don’t want to go to jail, but I also want to kick Yu ass and be president.”

BUCK: We were talking about grizzly bears before because it’s that kind of show. We talk about a lot of things. Don’t poke the Trump grizzly bear, folks. It’s bigger, stronger, and faster than you think, libs. You know? It’s not a good idea. Keep a hundred yards from the Trump grizzly, libs, I’m telling you.

CLAY: They’re gonna get mauled, and a lot of us are gonna enjoy it.

Recent Stories

Are We Safe from Democrats Passing Any Bad Bills This Year?

29 Jun 2022

CLAY: I got asked this question yesterday when I was hanging out at the pool, Buck, and I thought it was a good one. I don’t know the answer, and I’m curious what you think. Are we safe from Joe Biden being able to pass any more awful bills before the end of the year? I know we’ve talked about the Republicans running out the clock, and we need to get maybe some senators on to talk about this. When is the drop-dead date, so to speak, when Congress will be out of session and we no longer have to worry about them making disastrous decisions that make, for instance, inflation worse, i.e., are they going to pass any new bills that could increase taxes, that could lead to more money coming into the government’s coffers?

And I didn’t know the answer. Do you have a good sense on that? My sense was if we can get to Labor Day — because, come Labor Day, everybody is gonna go back to campaign for the midterms. That really is kind of the start of campaign season aggressively. But I didn’t know when the drop-dead date of, “Hey, we’re safe,” actually is. ‘Cause if Republicans win the House and/or win the Senate, which we feel pretty good about, nothing would really get passed for two years after.

BUCK: This is actually, in my mind, the system showing you its brilliance, as in gridlock —

CLAY: Yes, yes.

BUCK: — protects us from the stupidity of the people who happen to get in positions of power by promising things they couldn’t deliver, lying about all the different usual underhanded political nonsense, right? So gridlock is good. I almost feel like I could give the Gordon Gekko speech, “Greed is good.”

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Gridlock is good when you have an administration as incompetent as this one. So I certainly hope that will be the case, and I guess a way to step back from it, Clay, ’cause we’d have to get into, “Well, what parliamentary tricks could be pulled to try to get something through here, try to push something the Senate the House?” What would they want to see, to do at this point, really?

CLAY: Tax increase, I think.

BUCK: Right. Exactly right. So now we look, “Okay. They’re gonna pull a tax increase in the last month before a midterm election where they’re about to get crushed because they’re gonna go with a class warfare theme.” What exactly is the sales pitch to people that can’t afford — comfortably anymore — food, gas, rent? It’s gonna be, “We’re raising the corporate tax and in five years, this is going to…”

It doesn’t fly, right? So I can’t even think of what, short of some executive orders, but executive orders are immediately reversible which the libs always find out about and cry about. “Waah, they can be reversed?” By the way, that’s what Remain in Mexico is effectively about, right? They’re just saying, “We’re not gonna reimplement the policy,” and a court has already said, “What do you mean you’re not gonna reimplement the policy?”

CLAY: My concern — and this could potentially happen in a lame-duck session, which is even scarier.

BUCK: Yeah, give me your worst case, like war games.

CLAY: Any worst-case scenario is we get to September or late August, right before they’re gonna leave. They see all the polls. They know that they are going to lose the Senate and they know they’re going to lose the House, and they just say, “We’ve gotta pass whatever we want in terms of transformative legislation right now, because once we lose the Senate and the House — or even just the House — we’re not gonna be able to pass anything for two years.

“Then we’ve got a difficult election to potentially try and win in 2024. We may not control Congress and the White House again for another decade or more. Let’s try to change taxes,” for instance, “and get through another big spending bill just because we won’t be able to do it for a decade or more.” So my concern is they could be staring down the oncoming train, recognize that it’s gonna flatten them.

BUCK: So it’s basically, “Go for it. It’s ‘break the glass’ time. Who cares?”

CLAY: They’ve got nothing else, and the lame-duck session is even a little bit more scary in that respect ’cause I’m not sure what parliamentary rules apply. Once they lose the House and Senate, could they try and push something through before the new Congress is brought in?

BUCK: Why would Manchin, for example…? Just to play this out, right? Why would Manchin go along with that at this point? He’s essentially… He may have — and even some Democrats say it —

CLAY: He’s basically the president.

BUCK: — basically saved the Democrat Party from an implosion the likes of which we’ve never seen because as we all know, if inflation was 12% or 15%. The CPI index, never mind what the real inflation is for that people feel for the good that they actually need. That’s usually a higher number than the official number. You know, I don’t see it, but I also never underestimate how slimy and unfair and underhanded the Democrat left is willing to be, Clay, so I don’t want to us to be caught unaware.

CLAY: That’s my concern, and I would just say, we gotta be vigilant in trying to keep that from happening because everything Biden touches makes everything worse. The Bidas touch is real, the opposite of the Midas touch. We gotta be very careful.

Recent Stories

You’ll Enjoy Joy Behar’s Latest Dumb Take

29 Jun 2022

CLAY: I wanted to play this. Who is the dumbest person in all of media, according to our perspective, Buck? I think we’re in agreement.

BUCK: You know what I’m gonna say.

CLAY: Joy Behar. (laughing) She weighed in on the Supreme Court prayer case and said, I’d like to know if it would apply to Colin Kaepernick. Listen to Joy “The Biggest Idiot in Media” Behar.

BUCK: It’s so dumb, it’s not even wrong. It’s hard to even explain all the places in that one sound bite that this televised multimillionaire talking head went wrong because, wow!

CLAY: Listen, can we just play the opening like just the first three or four seconds of this? ‘Cause we need to grab this cut and keep it. I love before she even shares her opinion, she says, “This may be wrong and it might have something to do with the law,” something like that. What exactly did she say. The first three or four seconds again…

BEHAR: I would like to know if it would apply to Colin Kaepernick, for example. He takes a knee. I don’t know if this is really legal or any of what I’m saying. But it seems to me like the guy takes a knee.

CLAY: That’s all we need to hear.

BUCK: She actually… It would be better if we found out that every day before that show she’s about four merlots deep. Honestly. It would be better.

CLAY: For people out there who are dumb like Joy Behar, I knew there would be someone out there who compares this to Kaepernick. This was a public-school employee who was fired for praying after a football game. Colin Kaepernick was not fired for kneeling during the national anthem. He just wasn’t good enough to draw attention to himself and also suck. Right? Lesson is: If you’re gonna be controversial, be really good at what you do and then maybe you get to keep your job. Colin Kaepernick was not very good at what he was doing.

Recent Stories

AOC Demands Abortion Clinics for “Pregnant People” on Federal Lands, Spouts Idiocy on Colbert

29 Jun 2022

BUCK: Clay, with all the Supreme Court stuff coming down, it is fascinating to watch the arguments that are being made right now. I’m not even sure they’re arguments. I think it’s more accurate to call it wailing, shrieking, shouting, and throwing a tantrum from the left in a whole range of ways, the media, the Democrats in Congress. You have Elizabeth Warren in the Senate and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in the House both recommending the set up of emergency abortion clinics on federal land.

There is so much here that I think is interesting, but one thing is, they are about to lose control — I think quite obviously — of the House and the Senate. What do they think is really…? That is their solution, to set up abortion clinics in national parks? People are saying, like, “We’re gonna have abortion clinics in Yellowstone now?” They think this is going to give them what they want?

CLAY: I’m just picturing taking my family to the Smoky Mountains for summer vacation, and you pull into the Smoky Mountains, which I believe are the most visited national park in the country every year. Partly that’s ’cause they’re so accessible to the East Coast, so many people can drive. You get to Cades Cove, and you say, “Hey, kids, get ready — oh, look, there’s a bear,” and then you drive a little bit further and you’re like, “What’s that?” “Oh, that’s an abortion clinic,” or think about it, Buck. You go to Gettysburg and you’re like, “Let’s go look at Cemetery Ridge. Let’s walk through Pickett’s Charge,” and then (laughs) at the base of Pickett’s Charge, you suddenly have an abortion clinic? This is next-level crazy, Buck. Next-level crazy.

BUCK: As an aside, we’re gonna play the AOC calling for this in a second. This is just an aside because I saw this story this morning because I think unfortunately there’s video of it. I don’t know… People in Yellowstone… I’ve never been, and I actually want to go.

CLAY: I’d love to go too, and I haven’t either.

BUCK: Need to understand, bears and bison look cute from far away. I have seen grizzly bears in the wild. I’ve also seen them run.

CLAY: When did you see a grizzly bear in the wild?

BUCK: Oh, I went fly fishing in Alaska with my dad and my brother. It was fantastic.

CLAY: And you were just out there? How close were they?

BUCK: They were walking around us. Clay, when we first got to the stream, there were bears that would just come and were eating the salmon. Alaska, in terms of natural beauty, is one of the most amazing places on the planet.

CLAY: I’ve never been to Alaska, either.

BUCK: Oh, my gosh. Amazing. Yes.

CLAY: So did you see that grizzly man movie about the guy who went and lived with the grizzly bears and ended up getting killed by them?

BUCK: Yes, yes, and then they have the audio, and they don’t play it. Yes, I saw that. He was going to… That was going to end badly. The coolest thing about that guy’s situation was that he had wild foxes became his pets. They follow him around like a little miniature Schnauzer or something. Anyway. Not a Belgian Malinois, Clay, ’cause those are bad-ass dogs.

CLAY: Yeah, I know. Everybody’s mad at me for not knowing the Malinois.

BUCK: But no, I just, the aside here, I’ve gotta get back to AOC in a second.

CLAY: Could you reach… Could you throw a football and hit a bear?

BUCK: Could I have thrown a football and hit the bear? No, they were probably like a hundred yards away.

CLAY: Okay.

BUCK: No, no. We had Smith & Wesson .500s, a .50 cal handgun.

CLAY: They could charge you.

BUCK: And, by the way, the guides told us if they charge, it’s probably still gonna get to you even if you hit it.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: I bring up because the bison, people think that bison… It’s like a cow. It’s 2,000 pounds of muscle with horns and can run 30 miles an hour. Someone just died in Yellowstone. Or, actually, I think maybe was severely injured. I have to check on whether it was a fatality.

CLAY: So they just opened Yellowstone back up, right, because they had all the flooding.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: Someone got killed by a bison?

BUCK: Someone got mauled by a bison. I don’t know if “maul” is the proper term. Gorged. Is that it?

CLAY: Gored.

BUCK: Gored. Thank you. Gorged is eating. Gored by a bison in the park. Anyway, side note: Stay away from the bison, folks. Yellowstone, AOC, federal lands. Here is what she said about it.

BUCK: Can I just say, there’s something really twisted about talking about opening abortion clinics on federal land and saying “the babiest of babiest of baby steps.” Weird.

CLAY: She’s weird.

BUCK: Weird thing to say.

CLAY: She’s weird. And we need to play some of the cuts. I guess she did like a 25-minute interview on Stephen Colbert last night, who has just completely given up on the idea that he does comedy at all and now he sits and talks to AOC.

BUCK: Isn’t it great that our friend Greg Gutfeld’s show just kicks his butt in the ratings every night?

CLAY: Just destroys them. Not only did he destroy Stephen Colbert, which effectively is on the corner from your place, right?

BUCK: Close by. I see the Stephen Colbert line every day, and I want to walk past them and say, “Look, I know you’re visiting New York. This is not worth your time.” (laughs)

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: I just want to tell them.

CLAY: I love David Letterman. I know we’ve disputed this before. But he was in that studio, in the Ed Sullivan Theater there in New York City. What’s wild to me is, not only did Stephen Colbert destroy the legacy, in my opinion, of the Late Show with David Letterman of being funny and irreverent and zany and all those things, but everybody else followed him off the cliff ’cause he had success. Now Greg Gutfeld on Fox News is beating all of them in late-night, and they try to pretend his show doesn’t exist in media, because there’s still a lot of people who cover late-night as if it’s a story.

And they won’t even discuss, by and large, Gutfeld’s show even though it dominates all of them. But, Buck, what this is really about is not even just on national park land. Because in many states abortions are going to be even more available post-Roe decision than they were before. For instance, if you want to go New York, California, Illinois, they’re going to expand abortion rights even further than Roe did. So this is really about going to red state national parks where those people who live in those states are making their own decisions about what the abortion policy should be.

BUCK: This is about… There’s a lot of federal land in Utah, for example.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: They want abortion clinics — and remember, that means abortion clinics funded directly with federal dollars too. Now, getting into the seriousness and the morality of this again for a moment, this is about making every state and every taxpayer complicit in this, even after Roe v. Wade was overruled as a non-constitutional right, which is obvious. They can keep this make-believe game going of “No, it’s not a constitutional right anymore.”

If we had to sit and stomach for decades the lie that it is a constitutional right, they just have to stop being babies. Pardon the phrase. They have to stop being so sour grapes about this and pretending that this is not actually the way it’s gonna be going forward. What do you think happens when Republicans take back gun control of the Congress, by the way, with their federal abortion clinics? What do they think’s gonna be the reality there? And also, why do they hate democracy so much, Clay? Why can’t they allow this to play out in the states?

CLAY: Again, I think the wild thing about this — and that’s why I used the Smoky Mountains as an example. Tennessee, my home state, is going to make whatever choice they want as it pertains to abortion based on the democratic process. The idea that you’re going to build on federal land — ’cause you would have to build, right? You can’t just start doing abortions in tents, I can’t imagine. You would have to build a physical facility.

And suddenly when you’re driving through the Great Smoky Mountains, you’re going to pass by an abortion clinic? It just… I can’t imagine it becoming a reality. It just… It strikes me as really wild in terms of how it would be applied and the lack of logic that would also be entailed and it also would be messy. Just messy in terms of the way that people would respond to the federal government coming in, trying to big foot state law.

BUCK: We’ve gotten used to this. Conservatives actually have lived with this regime of state laws can be very, very different. We have a right to bear arms, right? We all know this. And liberals try to undermine it and eradicate it, destroy it all the time. We live in a country where, Clay, if I’m found with a firearm in New York, I face multiple years in prison, right? Whereas if I lived in Texas, I could just go and buy a gun at the store and walk around.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: New York says I’m a bad person for having a gun. Of course, ’til recently they wouldn’t even give you one to carry. It says I’m a bad person, deserve to be in prison. Texas says, “No, actually the Second Amendment really counts.” Same thing in Florida, right? We can find these other states. This is the reality that we face day in and day out. The left has to have it their way or they want to just overturn and overthrow the whole system. They have a meltdown. They can’t understand, this is actually the system we have. Roe was the wrong decision. Roe was the problem with the system, and that problem has now been purged.

CLAY: Another easy analogy — and obviously these are different things, Buck — is what happened with gambling law? I know this because I spend a lot of time with sports gambling. Supreme Court says we can’t have a system set in place when it comes to federal gambling legislation, so now every state can make their own decision.

So if you live in my home state of Tennessee, you can gamble on sports. If you’re down in Georgia, you can’t. Every state gets the right to make their choice, gambling, lotteries — to your point, guns — there are lots of issues all over the country. Even how much alcohol you can have in beer, how you can buy them, what the rules are gonna be. They’re different for every state.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

BUCK: There’s, I think, a reality that is dawning upon the… I hate to use the term “intelligentsia” for the left, because are they actually intelligent? It’s an open question on a lot of things. They’re certainly not reality based. But it’s starting to come together where they see, Clay, that their electoral fortunes are gonna be very dim — and keep in mind, everyone, it’s not just this midterm. The midterm will effectively mean the end of the Biden presidency as a force for “progressive change,” right, because not only are they going to lose any…

Now, remember, they still have the budget — they spent their $2 trillion, the American Rescue Plan, $1.9 trillion — and the president has his executive orders. But you got a Supreme Court majority that’s pretty constitutional in its thinking for the most part, certainly 5-4 constitutional in its approach, and you’re gonna have Republicans that control the House and the Senate. How did we get to this point? We often talk to you about the nuts and bolts of day-to-day life in this country that are frustrating people, and understandably so, like the price of gas, the price of food, the price of rent, the wide-open border.

We just had that horrific tragedy over 50 people killed in that one human smuggling incident ’cause we have a porous border so the cartels think they can run tractor-trailers… Think about this — and I’m sure they’re doing it successfully most days, by the way, so that’s why they’re taking these people, they’re doing these kinds of operations, ’cause it is lucrative for them because it usually works and now led to an awful tragedy in that instance. The crime in cities across the country…

I think Los Angeles just voted to downgrade some of the funding for the sheriff’s office out there. So there’s all this craziness of the policy. But also, in the tone and the language and the overall approach, people are starting to realize, “There’s something really wrong with these libs.” I know we’re going AOC, but I think she moves the media conversation in this country more than really any other Democrat.

Joe Biden’s president. Okay, fine. But, you know, usually it’s, “Joe Biden’s mumbling; he doesn’t know where he is,” and everyone goes, “Well, you know, that’s Joe!” AOC can say something and then all of a sudden, the media tries to back her up. We pull it apart because it’s usually so flimsy and stupid. And then they say, “Why are you obsessed with her?” Well, here she is talking about the Supreme Court decision. I just want you to hear it.

BUCK: Okay, can I just…? Put aside and we can dive in, Clay, if you think it’s worth it for everyone listening the really childish legal and political analysis here of the system. And this is what the left does. They don’t like the outcome; the system is illegitimate. They like the outcome, it’s, “Shut up! You’re threatening our democracy.” But she said, “pregnant people.” We did have a moment there on Friday when Roe was overturned when they were saying, “Women’s rights! Women’s rights,” and AOC, here she is going, “Guys, it really is ‘pregnant people’s rights.’” Folks are listening to this and saying, “The Democrats are actually insane. This is a real problem.”

CLAY: I hope that they run on a lot of what AOC would argue, because she represents the Blue Checkmark Brigade on Twitter, the idea that you would say “pregnant person.” Black, white, Asian, Hispanic, male, female? Women get pregnant. That is an overwhelming 90-plus percent win for sanity. Same way here on “expanding” the Supreme Court and ending the filibuster. Those are more detailed, nuanced perspectives. Because a lot of people don’t know, I bet most people in the United States don’t even know how many Supreme Court justices there are.

I would bet. So when you’re talking about expanding the Supreme Court, people’s opinions on that is not that refined because most people don’t even know how many there are or that they have lifetime tenure or even how a Supreme Court justice gets put on the court. Most people are busy. They’re not paying a lot of attention to that. But when you’re using the phrase, Buck, “pregnant person” or Latinx or you are arguing that America is a fundamentally awful and racist place, all of those things resonate in a big way.

And they resonate in a big way with people across identity spectrums — black, white, Asian, Hispanic — and that’s why I focus a lot on this show — and in fact am working on a book right now building on this idea — that there’s really become a division in America between sane and insane. And Republicans are mostly on the sane side. But Democrats have gone full on slain. And when you are arguing that men can get pregnant, I think it’s a bonkers, banana-land argument that everyone out there sees regardless of their identity.

BUCK: And here’s another one. You might see a single Democrat… I know you have a story at the excellent website OutKick.com dealing with this.


CLAY: (laughs)

BUCK: There’s a story about 29-year-old man competing in the border competition in New York City against… Just so everyone understands, the competition last year was won by a 16-year-old girl; a 10-year-old girl actually came, I think, in third place. So a lot of teenage girls in this competition.

CLAY: Skateboarding competition.

BUCK: Sorry. Skateboarding competition. Okay? Skateboarding competition. There’s prize money. A 29-year-old man is competing against these teenage girls, and the media wants to tell…? You could see the photos. The individual’s grown out his hair.

CLAY: Navy veteran with three kids, I believe.

BUCK: Yeah. He’s grown out his hair a little bit, and other than that, is biological male, folks. I mean, it’s a 29-year-old guy competing against — in the women’s division against — teenage girls, and the media wants you to believe, the Democrat malady… AOC, if she was ever asked about this — which she won’t be because the media knows this is not a good place for them to actually go, but if she were asked — she would say, “This is great! This is progress — 29-year-old guys beating 13-year-old girls in athletic competition is progress. This is America. This is what it means.” To your point, Clay, 90% of America looks at them and goes, “You guys need to stop being crazy.”

CLAY: You wonder on some level whether… You know, we have Pride month. What if men decided they wanted to identify as women month and basically went and won every women’s competition that was going on that was open. Because how do you…? It’s so absurd. Just follow my logic here. I don’t know how… You’re pointing out this 29-year-old skateboarder which we wrote about at OutKick, “What standard do you have to meet in order to be able to identify as a woman?” In other words, if there was ladies’ night at the bar down the street here where I’m living, and ladies got in for free and got dollar beers?

I’ve got a beard, but if I wanted to be a lady, could I identify as a woman to take advantage of ladies’ night and the lower price on beer? In other words, I don’t know that there’s any standard, even, to be applied to identify me as a man or woman when it’s just my gender identity in my head. So for so many of these competitions if a man walks up and says, “Hey, today I’m identifying as a woman,” could you go become a WNBA superstar tomorrow?

I haven’t played basketball in a long time. I think I could make a WNBA team right now. I think at six foot, 185, 43 years old, I think I would be good enough to play women’s professional basketball. I really do. If I just decide I want to identify as a woman, can I become a WNBA player? Can I become a pro women’s athlete? It sounds ridiculous. But that’s where the Democrat logic has taken us — and if I follow their logic, I think I could apply and say, “Yes, I’m a WNBA star.”

BUCK: I think that’s true. And, by the way, they would tell you that you would be brave.

CLAY: Be very brave of me.

BUCK: It’s stunning and brave, in fact.

CLAY: Stunning and brave.

BUCK: It would be stunning and brave.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: AOC was on with Stephen Colbert last night. Stephen Colbert initially was involved in humor, and his humor —

BUCK: (laughing) Tangentially in the proximity of humor, yes.

CLAY: Every now and then, you see something that goes viral on Twitter, Buck, and you just look at the number of people who liked it or shared it and you think to yourself, “What is going on?” Stephen Colbert tweeted yesterday, “If the Supreme Court is going to allow prayer in the middle of a high school football field, they should allow high school football games in the middle of a church.” This is such a bad and unfunny joke and not even remotely interesting of a comment — and I looked, and it got 30,000 likes.

And actually, the top result I see is, “This joke is worse than January 6th,” which is actually way funnier than Stephen Colbert’s attempted jokes. But it’s emblematic, Buck, of this sort of weird and not even really intelligent cottage industry that has emerged. Stephen Colbert was not good as a late-night TV show host, so he just basically started a propaganda show that was anti-Trump, and then it was successful, but it’s not a comedy show anymore. I’m gonna talk about AOC in a moment, but we were talking about this tweet off air, and you were like, “If one of us said that on air, it would make us want to cringe.”

BUCK: Yeah, I’d come back later and apologize to the audience for assaulting their ears with something so dumb. Yeah.

CLAY: Do you think…? I certainly don’t lack for confidence. I’m confident that I could a better late-night talk show than Stephen Colbert.

BUCK: Keep in mind he’s not even writing it.

CLAY: I’ve never been a guest on a late-night talk show.

BUCK: He’s not even writing his own jokes.

CLAY: He’s got a huge cottage industry of people writing his show for him, and it’s still awful every night.

BUCK: What we do with radio is we sit down and we talk for three hours a day with whatever comes to mind and whatever we think is important after reading for hours before we come on the show. A lot of people who are in the news-entertainment space — which is, I think, what you’d have to call now the Colbert show, right? It’s not really a comedy show. It’s kind of a new… It’s essentially the next iteration of The Daily Show, which, while clever, I always recognized it for what it was and Jon Stewart was the host there.

No one even cared. Trevor Noah is propped up by the liberal system. No one actually thinks he’s particularly talented, funny, or good at what he does. They gave him the show. No one ever heard of the guy before they gave him the show. But it doesn’t have any resonance. You never even seen people talking about Daily Show clips anymore. What Jon Stewart did was create a world where the libs are validated.

Their worldview is always validated and the other side gets made fun of, and if anyone pushes backson it, “It’s just jokes, man. It’s just jokes. I’m just a comedian!” Someone described it as clown nose on, clown nose off, or sword and shield. “Actually, I’m not serious. Actually, I want to sit down and talk to the secretary of defense now.” That’s the whole game, right? And they’ve been able to get away with this for a long time in various places.

But the late-night comedy shows aren’t really comedy shows anymore. And it’s really in keeping with the fact that they can’t actually make jokes, Clay. We know this. The only people they can make jokes about are Republicans and cisgender, hetero, white males. Anyone else that they make jokes about… I mean, look what just happened to Dave Weigel over at the Washington Post. He didn’t even make a joke!

CLAY: He’s on suspension.

BUCK: He retweeted the joke.

CLAY: Unpaid suspension.

BUCK: You’re not even allowed to make a joke about women.

CLAY: I want to reemphasize, I think this is a good joke, all right, and again I’m paraphrasing. this is how crazy the left has become. All he did was retweet! All he did was retweet this joke. “Every girl is bi. You just have to figure out whether it’s bicurious or…” Sorry, bisexual. I’ve already messed up the joke. Bisexual or bipolar, right? The joke is on the word “bi,” and it’s actually kind of funny, right? I sort of messed up that joke there.

But a lot of you would smile or you might snicker. He got expended for a month from his job for retweeting somebody else’s joke! I just can’t believe that we have reached this world. And to your point, Buck, that’s emblematic of what’s going on in late-night television. They can’t even make jokes because somebody’s gonna be offended, so they basically run propaganda networks now which are designed to ridicule Republicans.

BUCK: What is out there, right? You look at the day-to-day, there is so much to make fun of with the Biden administration!

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Joe Biden himself. Kamala Harris. If you were really a comedian looking to make jokes —

CLAY: Kamala is a gold mine.

BUCK: — Kamala Harris provides them. Just her sound bites! You don’t have to go back into her policy statements or whatever, just the things she says.

CLAY: She was a side chick for much of her political career. You don’t even have to go into that, although it is funny. How about Biden falling off of his bike?

BUCK: The whole —

CLAY: Can you imagine if Trump had fallen like Biden fell off the bike?

BUCK: The problem is their audience has been trained. The Democrat mind-set in the coasts particularly, so New England, New York, New Jersey, California, and the Pacific Northwest, the coastal blue staters, have really been trained to think that jokes are mean. You can’t laugh at a joke that involves anybody unless you despise them, which is not true, but that’s their mentality or, you’re punching down or you’re undermining them as human beings or whatever. And so as a result of that new framework, the only people you can make fun of — you see this all the time. They’re constantly making fun of right-wing Republicans. Right-wing Republicans aren’t very funny. (laughing) I hate to break it to them. It’s not that much that’s that funny about conservatives, which is why their shows stink.

CLAY: And so AOC went on for, like, a 25-minute infomercial last night with Stephen Colbert, and she was praising Cassidy. I don’t think AOC is smart enough to even understand what hearsay is.

BUCK: I don’t want to derail from the AOC thing, but can I just put out an idea and then I promise we’ll get to this AOC clip. AOC’s political career, if she had to do a Lincoln-Douglas style debate, right, which is what I did in high school — I don’t know what they call it other places, if she did L-D style debate with either one of us for an hour or any one of our conservative brothers and sisters in the movement, this media for an hour — her political career, I think, would be over. They never actually… This is one of the problems we have.

CLAY: That’s true.

BUCK: In the new media environment, these people who are the paragons of ideology for their side can get away with being total ignoramuses and morons without having questions. Say what you will about some of the Democrats, James Carville at least would mix it up with people, you know what I mean? I know he’s not a politician. He’s a pundit.

CLAY: Bernie Sanders, I disagree with much of what he says. Bernie Sanders is able to defend what he believes, whether you agree or disagree with him. Right? He is smart enough to understand, I think, on some level the larger permutations of his policies. He would debate with you or me, I think, and be proven wrong.

BUCK: He’s basically a communist who complains about rich people and always says everyone’s gonna get free health care.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: End of story. But he will say that.

CLAY: Yes. And I think he at least understands it on some level. I really question whether AOC is able to unpack the vast majority of what she says.

BUCK: So I derailed you. AOC reacted to Hutchinson, Clay.

CLAY: AOC loved Cassidy Hutchinson. Last night she went on Stephen Colbert and said this.

CLAY: It’s not true, right? The Secret Service are testifying it’s not true. But I just want to mention, she says absolutely stunning that anyone would seek a pardon. I think Republicans need to push back more aggressively on this. It does not stun me at all that if you were a Republican who was fighting against the election of Joe Biden and making aggressively legal arguments as a part of that fight, would it surprise you at all, Buck, if you were charged with a crime based on the way we’ve seen Democrats use the Department of Justice as a weapon of their political party?

So I don’t buy into the concept here — which is being spread and I think not fought back against very aggressively — that the only reason you would ask for a pardon is because you think you did something wrong. No, no, no, no. I think most of these guys and girls who, if they did — I’m not going to they did, but if they did — it wouldn’t be because they believe they did something wrong. I don’t think they believe that at all. It would be because they think they’re going to get a show trial like Donald Trump is, and might get prosecuted for political show even though they did nothing wrong. That makes complete sense to me that you would say, “Hey, could I get a pardon for this?”

BUCK: Yeah. The Mueller probe destroyed any faith that a rational person should have in the Department of Justice and the FBI’s ability to be nonpartisan when the most sensitive political issues are at stake. So of course people would be concerned about that, would be thinking about that going forward. I think as well you have to look… What exactly do they think they’re going to get out of all of this, right? Are they going to prosecute Donald Trump? I keep wondering about this. What is the charge going to be?

What would the charge have even been for Mark Meadows or Rudy Giuliani? What? Lying about an election result? I got news for libs. They got a lot of people running around who have a long history of lying about elections, lying about Russia collusion. This is the criminalization of politics. Unless Donald Trump himself was down on the Capitol grounds in the building with the big, furry hat on and the spear, they need shut their mouths about prosecuting the former president. It’s ridiculous.

CLAY: I agree with all of that. I would also add, another reason why you might want the pardon is, you might have to spend millions of dollars of your own money even if you did nothing wrong defending yourself.

BUCK: Yeah. The process is the punishment.

CLAY: That’s exactly right, and so I think Republicans need to do a better job fighting back against asking for a pardon means you did something wrong. No, no, no. It probably means that you foresee that Democrats are going to use the Department of Justice in a political matter.

BUCK: That’s why we’re here, Clay —

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: — to crack our knuckles and throw some haymakers.

CLAY: I just think that Republicans are doing a poor job of responding to that attack. And I think it’s not a difficult attack to respond to. And I also think AOC is an imbecile and the Stephen Colbert show sucks, by the way.

Recent Stories

Fired-Up Lawyers Flood the Phone Lines

29 Jun 2022

CLAY: I’m glad I’m not alone in this from a legal perspective. A bunch of people weighing in, Buck, who are lawyers. Let’s start with Betty in Connecticut. You’re a former assistant attorney general. What did you think about Cassidy?

CALLER: I’m outraged. I was assistant attorney general for 28-1/2 years in the child protection unit here in Connecticut and 35 years as a trial lawyer, and the first thing I thought when I heard this crap going on is, “Who is in charge here?” There are lawyers on that committee. They know better. They should be ashamed. Hearsay wouldn’t be permitted in court, and this just makes the whole thing a joke. And I’m just wondering, as you did, Clay, that the bar associations, who don’t really have much chutzpah, should be doing more about this kind of crap.

CLAY: I agree.

BUCK: I think Betty’s right. I think they also… The odds —

CLAY: She’s fired up like I am, Buck.

BUCK: Yeah, she is. The odds of any Democrat on that committee even getting a sternly worded letter from the bar committee? I’d give thousand-to-one odds against that.

CLAY: Karen is in Ohio. She’s an attorney and a magistrate, hears cases every day. Karen, what was your reaction when you heard Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony?

CALLER: So my first reaction was shock. Why in the world would a witness be presented who is so far removed from the actual events? Why not inquire of the witness who was in the car with President Trump?

BUCK: Yes, the Secret Service agents! It’d be pretty easy to find them. It’s not like we don’t know who they were.

CLAY: If someone tried to do this in a hearing that you were presiding over, what would your reaction be?

CALLER: My reaction would be, I would stop the hearing, inquire of the presenters of evidence, say, “Why aren’t you presenting testimony from the person with direct knowledge?” I’m not finding this witness to be credible, and I’m telling you right now it risks the credibility of that evidence. And it suggests a motive on the part of the presenters of the evidence to further their narrative, which is not an accurate one, and I think they’re putting their thumb on the scale of justice to try to achieve a result that they want. It is not a result that has anything to do with the truth.

BUCK: Absolutely. Karen’s nailing it. Karen, thank you so much for calling in. Clay, I just want to throw out an idea, and I know we have one or more call, another lawyer. But I do think at some level the Democrats, it’s so sloppy and so desperate because they know January 6th isn’t gonna… They’re all talking about they’re gonna bring charges against Trump. Really? Bring it, libs. Let’s see how that goes for you.

I think they’re creating a psychological safe space for Democrats going into an election they’re gonna get annihilated on, where they get to be the heroes and Democrats are doing a lot and they’re standing up for our democracy. You know, that’s really… I think this is just this narrative creation of safe space for libs who can’t look at the reality of gas prices, crime, the border, inflation, et cetera, and that’s what this is really all about.

CLAY: It feels to me like such a Hail Mary, but it’s like you tried to get the snap off without your team even lined up to protect your quarterback and the quarterback just got broken, right? It’s not even a Hail Mary formation. It’s beyond the desperate level.

BUCK: You might have even gotten sacked in the end zone for a safety, Clay.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: Yeah!

CLAY: Great sports analogy. Matt in Mississippi, Matt, what’s your thoughts on this when you saw Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony as a lawyer?

CALLER: Well, my thoughts are if this were a civil matter and you have the federal rule of civil procedure number 11, which talks about how when you sign your pleadings or you file a complaint of some sort, you’re making a representation to the court that you have made an inquiry that is reasonable under the circumstances.

CLAY: Yes.

CALLER: And, now, I could sit here all day long in a complaint, but I’m certifying to the court that I have done inquiry and that I have corroboration for that, otherwise I would be in violation of rule 11.

CLAY: That is a phenomenal point. I think we gotta go to break. You can hear the music playing us out. But I’m not alone, Buck.

BUCK: This audience could be arguing in front of the Supreme Court and do very well. It’s amazing.

Recent Stories

Buck’s Necktie Poll and the Perfectly Behaved Travis Boys

29 Jun 2022

BUCK: Clay, I haven’t checked recently, but as of this morning with something like 15,000 votes in, ending the men’s necktie as a formal and business wear convention with almost 15,000 votes, 50-50, totally split. Some people like the tie; they want to keep it. Some people think the tie, like me, is something that we should say adios to. So there’s that one, and I know you got some news.

I had two strangers say something nice to me. They said, “Give ’em hell, Buck,” when I walked past. I was with my girlfriend, too, which I always appreciate that when someone says something nice, make me look good in front of the lady. They said, “Give ’em hell, Buck,” when I was walking. That was all they said. I was walking past them in Delta Lounge in Miami. You had, apparently, a lady say that the Travis boys are perfectly well behaved.

CLAY: We went to dinner last night. I had my 7-year-old and my 11-year-old, late dinner down here in Florida, got in probably around 7:45, and I don’t think the woman even knew who I was, but she —

BUCK: You’re sure she didn’t want some Titans tickets? You sure about this?

CLAY: I don’t think she had any clue. Me and the two boys, and at the end of the meal she’s probably middle-age and if she has kids of her own, college age-ish, a little bit older than me, and she said, “Your boys were fantastic. They were so well behaved during this meal,” and I just thought it was… First of all, it’s always great to hear that when you are a parent. A lot of parents out there know exactly what I’m talking about. And second, the fact that it happened right after we had that discussion yesterday on the show about kid behavior in restaurants, I couldn’t resist. The timing on it was phenomenal. My kids were fantastic and I got ’em praised.

BUCK: One thing about noticing when some kid is throwing a monstrous tantrum in a restaurant is that the next time you see a child who is sitting there politely behaving himself — enjoying their spaghetti and meatballs or their grilled cheese off the kids’ menu — you’re, you’re like, “Look at well behaved young lad or young lass!”

CLAY: Airlines are the other place, Buck, I have been thrown up on in air by two of my three kids, legitimately thrown up on. Maybe all three, actually. Certainly two. I might have blacked out. I think it was actually been all three, and when you have had to travel with a kid that is not doing well on an airplane, you will never… I remember —

BUCK: Being thrown up by your own kid. I was like, “Wow, you are really patient.”

CLAY: Yeah. No. All three of my kids at different points have thrown up on me in the middle of an airplane flight, most recently about six months ago.

BUCK: That’s true love, Papa Travis, you know?

CLAY: Yeah. It’s tough. It’s tough to handle.

Recent Stories

Republicans Should Investigate the Jan. 6 Show Trial

29 Jun 2022

CLAY: Are lawyers as blown away by this decision of the January 6th committee to allow her to testify to hearsay as I am, Cassidy Hutchinson? Also, not do the bare minimum of research to provide some element of corroboration. Report from Politico: The Secret Service has not been contacted in the last 10 days. I just want you to think about this. If you knew that someone was going to testify to what Secret Service agents had allegedly said happened inside of a vehicle, wouldn’t the first thing you would do — if you truly cared about the truth at all — be to go to the Secret Service agents and ask them for comment?

Take it outside of a court proceeding ’cause this wouldn’t be allowed in a typical trial ’cause it’s hearsay. If you were just doing due diligence on behalf of your company… I used to do sexual harassment investigations. This would be like me taking one side and not even attempting to contact the other side to get their story. At the most basic level even of journalism — and we know there’s a lot of really rigged journalism that goes on.

Someone tells you a story, the bare minimum you could do is reach out to the person that they told you the story about and say, “Hey, did you say this? Does this comport with your recollections? What did you see as the actual eyewitness?” Instead, this January 6th committee put on somebody testifying to what someone else had said without even asking the people who had actually been there. You can hear it in my voice.

Buck, he was researching this yesterday afternoon, I started tweeting about it some. As I had time — ’cause this was happening while we were on the air, so I didn’t spend much time in real time, we were on the air. I’m legitimately blown away that this testimony occurred. And not to mention that they made it bombshell, that they called a special session to allow this testimony? It’s inexcusable, it’s indefensible, and Republicans I think should almost start their own investigation of the January 6th committee when they win the House.

BUCK: It’s not supposed to be fair, right? It’s supposed to be destructive. The whole point of this isn’t to get to some underlying truth. This is a “Trump is worse than Hitler” infomercial for emotionally unstable libs. That’s what you’re watching with these January 6th hearings day in and day out. There’s nothing new that we’re learning of any consequence, and that’s why — I mean, Clay, you’ve done criminal trials.

If they had a better shot than this, they would have taken it, right? If they actually had something after all of this, after all the investigation… January 6th was 18 months ago, give or take now, right? We’re going way back. They’ve had a lot of time to prepare. It’s not like this was a few weeks ago. But I also think at some level the Democrats, what we’re seeing here, yes, there’s always incompetence and there’s delusion, right? I don’t know if… It’s so hard when you watch someone like Congressman Raskin.

Is he a delusional liar or a liar who has delusions, right? Which is it really? Is it really believe this BS or is it he’s just feeding this to his constituents knowing that it’s all garbage and maybe he believes a little bit of it here and there? They have no counternarrative about the Biden administration. Steve Scalise, for example, I think says it really well when he goes, “People aren’t look at this and saying, ‘Oh, yeah, this is so important.’ They’re saying, ‘I can’t afford gas!’”

BUCK: Yeah, they’re angry about things that actually matter.

CLAY: Yeah, and the reality is the ratings came out yesterday — we were talking about them for cable news in the second quarter, basically, Buck — CNN and MSNBC as well as the New York Times and the Washington Post need Donald Trump more than Fox News and the Wall Street Journal do because their entire worldview is based on Donald Trump being the devil. And as soon as Donald Trump is off the stage, then there’s nothing that unites the Democrat Party.

They have to discuss the border being wide open — they have to discussing murder rate skyrocketing, 8.6% inflation, war in Europe — and so instead they have these fake show trials. And, again, I want to hear from other lawyers out there: Are you as blown away that this could happen as I am? 1-800-282-2882. By the way, Buck, did you see your boy Jake Tapper actually went after Raskin when you were mentioning is he a delusional liar or not?

CNN, to his credit, Jake Tapper said, “Wait a minute. Did you guys have any corroborating evidence at all in order to put this witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, on the stand?” Raskin couldn’t even answer the question. Joe Scarborough — we were talking about him earlier — is a graduate of law school, University of Florida 1990, according to our team. Well, the Gators need to pull that diploma back.

Because if he’s not able to analyze on his show — despite the fact they pay him millions of dollars — this Cassidy Hutchinson being hearsay and being immediately shot out of the air by the actual witnesses in the vehicle, I just… I know that I have a low standard already, Buck, both of us do, for media coverage of events. But this was even below my incredibly low standard of expectation.

BUCK: Let’s just think. We can transition this for just a second from the political realm to a straight-up trial. This is not a trial. It’s Congress.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: It’s a show trial in the old Soviet sense, and this is the third one. They’ve done two.

CLAY: Third impeachment.

BUCK: This is the third. This is what they love to do. They can’t stop with the theatrics. It’s also absurd. If there was a shooting — and Secret Service, remember, are law enforcement — and there were cops on the scene who apparently witnessed the shooting, would you go to a friend of one of the cops who said that they saw something, or would you actually call the cops and say, “Did you see the shooting?” Obviously, they are unserious in this process.

CLAY: It’s almost criminal, in my mind, that you could put this girl, Cassidy Hutchinson, 25-year-old, and have her testify without even attempting to corroborate what she was gonna say. Now, if you wanted to have her testify and say, “Well, the Secret Service agents now are saying something different than what they told her back in January,” that’s an argument you could make.

It wouldn’t be admissible, probably, in a court of law because it’s hearsay. But in this show trial, okay. Maybe you could still allow it. They didn’t even put the Secret Service agents, who reportedly are willing to testify under oath right now in front of the committee, and the committee hasn’t subpoenaed — the committee subpoenaed — every Republican on the planet. They subpoenaed Sean Hannity, I think, for God’s sake!

BUCK: Let’s think about this. You’re a congressional investigator. You hear this story. Do you go to the Secret Service agents right away or not?

CLAY: Yeah! Yeah! It’s the first thing you do!

BUCK: Of course. Of course.

CLAY: If you actually cared about the truth, which is why, Buck, I was using as an example, I’ve done — I used to do — investigations internally for companies into sexual harassment allegations. So I would have to talk to everyone and then write up a report. This was not a criminal or civil investigation. This was internal for the company. But if I didn’t talk to every possible witness, I would be doing a sham investigation, and it’s insulting to me that that could be going on with our tax dollars right now.

BUCK: This is supposed to be a sham investigation, and everyone’s now seeing it. That is the whole point, and it’s laid bare for everyone to view with your own eyes.

Recent Stories