×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

How Donald Trump Could Dominate in 2024

26 Apr 2022

CLAY: We are here because we’re starting to stack some dubs. I gotta be honest with you, Buck: When you think about CNN+ shutting down, losing $300 million, and you also then add in the fact that Elon Musk has bought Twitter, that the mask mandate has come plummeting down thanks to the judge in Florida, and that Joe Biden’s approval ratings continue to tank, all of those things are stacking up dubs for the good guys.

And the question you asked as we went to break, I think is one that is of paramount discussion and important. What should Twitter do with Donald Trump, what should Donald Trump do with Twitter, and how do we assess that impact? My theory, Buck — and I was sharing this yesterday — is I think that as part of his relationship with TRUTH Social that Trump has likely agreed that he — I don’t know this for certain so this is just my theory — that Trump has likely agreed that he will not rejoin Twitter.

And so I think that’s why he’s saying that he won’t rejoin Twitter, because he’s got a equity stake in TRUTH Social, and if you were investing in TRUTH Social, one of the clear land mines out there would be, “Well, what if Twitter invited you back? What are we buying as a part of your exclusivity?” I think they’ve got him exclusively. But I actually think Elon Musk should invite Donald Trump back on Twitter.

I think that would be the right call. I think Elon Musk taking over Twitter should make the opinion… Alex Berenson. Babylon Bee. I think he should wipe out all Twitter bannings and end the concept of, “We’re going to kick people off of Twitter for what they say,” in my opinion. And the question that is out there is, does Trump actually benefit from being off Twitter?

We’ve argued that the answer may well be yes because the people who are most likely to decide to embrace Donald Trump or not are — many of them are — suburban women, these swing voters. Maggie Haberman at the New York Times actually I think picked up on the argument that we’ve been making the past couple days ago. Here she is making it well.

HABERMAN: His people put out yesterday that he’s not gonna go back on Twitter even with Elon Musk buying it. Let’s see whether that holds true in a couple of months. I think it’s very hard for him… He has to say that because otherwise it craters that deal, from — the social media deal of his own from which he stands to make money. That thing’s not going well. I tend to assume what he wants is to be back on Twitter.

But look. I think that when you look at it politically, Republicans and Democrats will both tell you that Twitter did Donald Trump a favor and actually hurt Democrats by taking him off Twitter. He ceased to be a central player politically the same way, and you got less of a reminder daily of the things he’s willing to say. So let’s see where this goes.

BUCK: There is an indicator here, Clay, of — I think — truth in what she is saying, and that is the Daily News cycle the Democrats try to run are is, “January 6th, Trump, insurrection, Trump, white supremacy, Trump,” all the time. They keep trying to bring it back, and this is their game plan going into the midterms. To anyone who has even a little bit of objectivity, it feels pathetic and desperate, right? Donald Trump is not president, not even elected office.

The guy is playing golf, hanging out at Mar-a-Lago. You’ve seen him down there. I’ve seen him. He’s having a great time. He’s not in any way somebody who should be driving the left/the Democrat news cycle right now. But they created such a… I mean, CNN, for example, just became an anti-Trump network. It existed to oppose Donald Trump, which I think led very directly into the collapse of CNN+ ’cause —

CLAY: Yep.

BUCK: — what are they offering on their main channel right now, never mind with CNN+? So there is this possibility that it will reinvigorate, if you will, the left if Trump were on Twitter and saying things and they could say, “Oh, look at what he’s done here, look at what he’s done there.” That all said, if he runs again for president, there’s just no way he’s not gonna use it. I just don’t believe it. There’s no way he’s not gonna get back on Twitter. I just don’t believe that that would be possible.

CLAY: Here is what I would be doing if I advised Donald Trump associated with this. I would be putting the polling in front of him on a regular basis. This came out yesterday, Buck. Insider Advantage and the Harvard-Harris poll both polled Trump versus Biden head-to-head. Insider Advantage had Trump up four. General election Harvard-Harris had Trump up two.

By the way, all of this, if I’m sitting there and saying to Trump, “Look, you’re gonna win. Whoever the Republicans nominate in 2024, if Joe Biden truly runs, should win. The only way you don’t win is if the story shifts from ‘Biden is a disaster’ to, ‘Let’s talk about something other than Biden being a disaster.’” Elections should be a referendum when there is an incumbent or the incumbent in office or the incumbent party in office.

And I’m putting in front of Donald Trump, “Hey, things are going really well pow for you. You come on, you do an hour with Clay and Buck every now and then. You go do your Sean Hannity interviews. You hop on with friendly media. I look at the encouraging…” And when I say “friendly media,” I mean, people who don’t think that Donald Trump is the devil incarnate because a huge percentage of the media does.

I don’t think he gains by talking to those people. But I think those middle-of-the-road voters, they’re sitting around and they’re saying, “You know what? I may not have loved Trump,” these are the persuadable, middle of the road, “but he was nowhere near as bad as Biden is on every issue.” My concern is the Twitter makes the issue Trump again as opposed to Biden.

BUCK: Yeah. And you also have… There must be, I think, if Trump is gonna run for a second term, which it looks like he is – we, I don’t know yet; it’s a ways off, but — there’s gonna need to be people around him who say, “Okay. This time you already crushed the media. You brought CNN to its knees. It was highly interesting. It was amazing.”

CLAY: You broke them.

BUCK: “Now it’s time… Round two, assuming we get there, it’s not a circus anymore. It’s serious. Now is when the agenda gets implemented. Now is when the wall gets finished. Now is when the promises that are made are all promises kept,” ‘cause even Trump would say, “Look. It was supposed to have eight years,” right? No one thinks it all got done in four years.

But that shift from circus to seriousness — now, the media is, of course, gonna say insurrection. But I’m saying block that out for a second from what Trump and the people around him could do, a renewed sense of focus and a lack of distraction. Now, there are gonna be some people who will say they’re not confident, necessarily. That’s a shift that’s possible.

CLAY: Yep.

BUCK: We’ll have to see. But I do think that’s important and will be important going forward to bring back… Look, there were a lot of working-class voters that did not… Put aside the fraud and the cheating. Just if you look at the numbers, there were working-class voters in Michigan and Wisconsin and Pennsylvania who didn’t turn out in 2020 the way they did in 2016. There were some problems here, and to address that properly the next time around us there needs to be a sense of focus, a sense of purpose, and pursuing the agenda and the mission and not just slapping around Joe Scarborough on Twitter for kicks.

CLAY: Yeah. And look, I think the question becomes, “Do you want to dominate, right? Or do you want to be sitting late at night worried about when those final ballots are gonna come in, right?” Because 2016, narrow victory; 2020, by the numbers, narrow loss. Basically, a hundred thousand, 150,000 vote swing. I really believe that Trump could dominate, especially in the Electoral College, in 2024, if he runs the campaign of, “Hey, I wasn’t perfect, but Biden is a disaster, and I will fix the mess that he created.”

That’s the message. That’s the message in a sentence. I’m big on, Buck, when I used to teach — I taught creative writing — back in the day at Vanderbilt in a different life. I’m big on if you can distill anything into a sentence, story in a sentence is huge. Trump’s story in a sentence is, to me, “I wasn’t perfect as president, but I was away better than Joe Biden, and I will fix everything that he’s gotten wrong.” That’s a landslide win.

BUCK: Yes.

CLAY: But if it’s Joe Biden saying, “I’m not perfect, but Donald Trump is gonna be tweeting like crazy and he’s not gonna let you sleep comfortably at night,” that’s a right on the periphery moment of in 2024 win or loss again.

BUCK: And obsessed with the 2020 election.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: This is the other thing. We’re really gonna talk about this. How do we move…? How do we become a Republican Party that can have a conversation about the leader of the party that is helpful going forward, that is not just always a cheering section? This is gonna be an issue. I worry about this. Yes, you have to address the concerns of 2020 for the next election, but there’s a difference between making sure that we work on election integrity and that people have full faith and a sense of accountability in the elections, and sounding like you’re complaining about it still.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: There’s a difference.

CLAY: It’s a great point.

BUCK: It might be subtle, but there is a difference in these things.

CLAY: And my hope is that 2022 is such a landslide that that puts 2020 in the background, and we start to focus on 2024. Because elections are about the future. They’re not typically about the past. All of these are gonna be big, monumentally important conversations to have.

BUCK: If Ron DeSantis can win in Florida, let’s say, by a few hundred thousand votes after winning by 40,000 votes?

CLAY: Thirty thousand. Yeah.

BUCK: It means that elections can have consequences and really good ones too. You want to run the table.

CLAY: Exactly right. ‘Cause I think there’s a good chance that Florida is the story coming out of 2022 and people are saying, “Holy cow. Florida went from a toss-up state for 20 years to one that’s firmly in the Republican camp now,” which would be potentially part of the monumental victory that Ron DeSantis could show in 2022.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Why Elon Musk Buying Twitter Is Such a Big Deal

26 Apr 2022

CLAY: We are tap-dancing a little bit after a monster win that came down at the end of yesterday’s show. Elon Musk has officially bought Twitter. And almost immediately, Buck and I have seen our overall follower accounts skyrocket, up by over 10,000 each. You may not think that’s a very big deal, but both of us see this as a fairly consequential outcome that is unlikely to be occurring in a world where Elon Musk hasn’t bought Twitter.

We’re gonna dive into the overall importance of what Elon Musk represents here. Also, a federal judge saying that Title 42 cannot be ended on May 23rd, we will discuss some of that as the border crisis continues to reach a crescendo. We’ll also continue to discuss Biden’s falling poll numbers and what they may represent.

We got a couple of great guests. Douglas Murray and Miranda Divine are going to be with us in the third hour. But right off the top here, thesis statement from me. I really believe that Elon Musk buying Twitter is the most significant thing that has occurred from a First Amendment perspective in the 21st century.

I believe it is going to change things in a seismic way in terms of our discussion, in terms of the power that Facebook and Instagram and TikTok and YouTube and all of these different platforms have. Google, Apple, all of them are now going to have some eyesight on the choices that they are making because I believe Elon Musk is going to publicize a lot of the internal data at Twitter, which will give us optics on many other sites as it pertains to their algorithms. But let’s start here, Buck. When was the last time that you added over 10,000 Twitter followers in a day? Has it ever happened that you can remember in the time that you’ve been on Twitter?

BUCK: It would have to be back in the day of Trump retweets. So, we’re going back years, and I don’t even think that did it. I think maybe a couple thousand from the Trump retweet era. But for those who are listening it’s like — and I know so many of you aren’t on Twitter, so you ask, “Why is this such a big deal?” This is where so many ideas start and then gain support and then filter into the rest of the information ecosystem.

CLAY: Your front page — comes from Twitter. If you read a newspaper, it is in many ways coming through the Twitter marketplace of ideas. If you watch a show on television, it is, in many ways — no matter where it is — being distilled through the prism of Twitter. For people out there who are not active, that is kind of a rough approximation of what’s going on on a day-to-day basis.

BUCK: And so now what we’re seeing is people like Clay and me who have been saying for years, “This is rigged, they’re shutting things down, there are shenanigans going on, they’re lying…” Twitter was lying to the American people for years about not actually having political censorship underway, just about “safety,” you know? You know, this Daily Mail piece, I see this person who is “Twitter’s lead for global curation standards” who’s very upset about this.

Global curation standards. I didn’t even know that was a job title they had there. This is actually Orwellian. People abuse that term all the time. But the notion there should be a person who is “curating,” which is just another way of saying imposing their own beliefs and picking, picking and choosing ideas, personalities, concepts, political movements on a global scale for everybody to see on this platform just goes to show you.

Who is this person? What are her beliefs? Why do we have to be subjected to them in and for people who say, “Oh, it’s a private…” First of all, as we all know, it’s a private company now. It was a public company before. Not a state enterprise. But it’s a private company, about to be, and I guess it can do what it wants. But, Clay, they built this platform with the promise that it would be free speech and have lied to people.

They decided to weaponize an open free speech platform all across issues. And they’re lying to you now about what’s really going on. They keep saying it’s gonna be… They’re saying Elon Musk is a child of Apartheid South Africa and a racist, he’s a bad person and he’s… They’re going after him with all this stuff. The things that upset the right that we can’t say on Twitter are things like “masks don’t work,” which they don’t, that men are not women, which they aren’t.

I mean, there’s very straightforward rules that we talk about. They never even address this. You don’t say sterility over at CNN and you don’t see — I don’t know where The View is on this, they’re probably be like, “What’s Twitter?” you know, Joy Behar weighing in.

CLAY: I want to play a couple of cuts. Sometimes you can tell you’re in a good spot when the people who are the angry ones are the angry ones. By the way, I put up 10 suggestions for Elon Musk. I just clicked “publish” right before we sat down for this show. I spend a lot of time on Twitter — way too much, to be honest. I probably should have spent more time on Instagram and YouTube and Facebook, because they’re wildly more popular. But my media company basically came to exist in many ways through Twitter and so I’m obligated to be sharing stuff like all day long, as you know, Buck.

BUCK: Oh, yeah. My man Clay tweets a lot, folks. (laughing) Does Mrs….? Tell the truth. Does Mrs. Travis ever take the phone away at the dinner table and say, “Clay, that’s enough tweeting?”

CLAY: Buck, this is the truth. Do you ever look at your iPhone and see how much time you spend on your phone?

BUCK: I try not to because it’s depressing.

CLAY: I spend eight hours a day on my phone.

BUCK: Wow.

CLAY: Now, partly that’s when we’re here doing the show like I’m scrolling, you’re scrolling like for three hours to see what the news is, but that’s not counting the other amounts of time that are out there. And a lot of it is on Twitter. The vast majority of the time that I spend on any app if you look — it breaks down the amount of time you spend on apps — the vast majority of my time has been on Twitter.

So I have been initially wildly enthusiastic about the future of Twitter. A decade ago, before the censor culture took over, before identical politics and cancel culture took over, I was all in on Twitter. I think Elon Musk can rescue it. But it’s listen to, first of all, this is Ari Melber. He’s on MSNBC. I don’t know him at all, but I want you to listen to him.

This feels like satire because he’s suddenly realizing, “Wait! If Elon Musk wants to, he can rig the entire site and control what you see and don’t see,” and the lack of awareness from this MSNBC opinionist is staggering because many of you out there have been saying, “Yeah, that’s what’s been going on for years, you nincompoop!” Listen.

BUCK: Clay, can I just say, I wonder if this Mr. Melber is aware of the fact that Twitter banned a sitting United States president?

CLAY: (laughing) I know.

BUCK: The actual president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, was booted from this platform! He had over 80 million followers, something like that, and they kicked off the actual leader of the Free World. Okay? And I said it at the time, that was a crossing-of-the-Rubicon moment.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: That was when… You know, we focus a the month more now on the Hunter Biden laptop because that story is ongoing, really. But when they booted — and of course there was the suppression of that story to try to throw the election to Biden. Isn’t it interesting? They like their social media platforms like they like their elections, Clay: Rigged.

CLAY: Yeah. Well done.

BUCK: Why, thank you. Here we are seeing that they went to that length and everything that we thought about them when they booted the president off which is, “Wow this is a straight up…” It’s like a DNC propaganda operation now. Doesn’t have to do it all the time ’cause I know this sort of low-IQ lib crowd will say, oh, but you and Clay are on Twitter.

Yeah, but in key moments, on lockdowns, on masks, on election integrity, on what happened in Georgia, what happened in Arizona, on the Hunter Biden laptop, they shut that stuff down. If we were totally all booted off of Twitter, it wouldn’t… Propaganda has to be believable enough. This what everyone has to understand. They only have to really push down hard on the scale in key moments. It doesn’t have to be across the board on everything.

Yeah, we say Joe Biden looks senile and absurd because true. They’ll let us say that stuff but when it’s really important to them, when it comes to the transgender agenda, for example, and, you know, sports and “dead naming” and all these different things? That’s where they turn the screws and shut down the right. That’s where they actually use the pressure.

CLAY: And our boy… So that’s MSNBC. CNN was also really unhappy about suddenly Elon Musk buying Twitter, and our boy Brian Stelter, he was really upset by this, and in fact he was saying, “Do you want to go to a party with total…?” (laughing) Sorry. “Do you want to go to a party with total freedom?” Yeah, actually, I kind of do.

BUCK: Brian Stelter probably wasn’t invited to a lot of parties in high school. Let’s be honest. I mean, I don’t like to be that guy, but…

CLAY: Let’s listen to cut 2 as Brian Stelter freaks out about the party that you might be invited to – and there’s no rules, guys!

BUCK: Can I just ask you, Clay (impression), “Do you want to go to a party where if beer is just flowing from kegs, where there are beautiful women without hall monitors present and where people are dancing rhythmically to loud music? Do you want to go to that party?”

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: I think you do.

CLAY: Yes. Some of the girls might not have covered their full bodies, they might even be in halter tops or skirts, third party legs might be visible, they might be in heels, they might have done their hair, they might be good-looking. Is that the kind of party that you want to go to? Brian Stelter doesn’t want to go to that party.

It’s an easy joke to make. But, first of all, there are rules. Like, I haven’t ever been to a party where you’re just walking in to like, “Hey, there’s the keg over there, but, by the way, that guy has a gun and he might — he’s gonna shoot somebody every five minutes at the party.” Like, every party has rules.

BUCK: Every party has rules, and so actually his analogy — if we’re gonna belabor it a little bit here — yeah, no, people are welcome to the Twitter party. They’re not allowed to burn the house down. But they also can’t decide, “I don’t like your baseball hat so you don’t get to get to the keg.” You know, they also can’t just be arbitrary and capricious about who is actually allowed to come.”

CLAY: You can’t walk in and just say, “Oh, your music, I don’t like it, there should be no music in this party if you’re a guest.” Like, you don’t get to make that choice. And if you don’t like the party, you can leave, which is that easy analogy as well.

BUCK: I want to make my pitch you Clay when I come back about this is the effect — the ripple effect of this — and I actually do have faith and it is faith. In Elon we trust when it comes to Twitter and social media now, right? I mean, he could… We don’t know yet. But I have faith that he’s going to do this –

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: — and it will have massive second order, massive ripple effects on other social media platforms and on the national political conversation. And I think you’re even gonna look at this as a moment that, wow, the left was already losing ground going into this midterm; this is like we just put rocket boosters on the freight train that is heading for them.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

BUCK: Gonna give you a pro tip, everybody: Anytime someone who makes a living in the news, information, and commentary space says, “I believe in the First Amendment but…”

CLAY: (chuckles)

BUCK: Guess what? They don’t really believe in, they don’t really believe in freedom of speech, I’ve gotta tell you. Elizabeth Warren — Elizabeth Warren — among them. She has tweeted out, Clay — I’m sure you saw this — that Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter is “dangerous for our democracy.”

If you’re wondering how this is such a big deal, think about what the Democrats’ response to this is. They are exposing themselves for being petty tyrants obsessed with the power to shut down any words they don’t like, to elevate really stupid, flimsy, indefensible ideas. This whole concept — and I want everyone to remember this.

The whole concept here of “disinformation”? Disinformation has become the buzzword — really the code word — for “we will shut you down for saying this.” The only reason they’ve been able to even get as far with this, Clay, as they have is because they had total control of the social media platform to decide that something was it was and to act on it. Now, contrarian positions have to actually be dealt with in the public square — or soon, I should say, that will happen.

CLAY: Yeah. And look. Elizabeth Warren, I just… (laughs) It is perfect evidence to me, Buck, of sometimes the people who are attacking you let you know that you’re on the right side. And what Elizabeth Warren is effectively arguing here… Think about who has become the villain. Elon Musk was the patron saint of left wingers because he managed to build an electric car company and theoretically help to create some energy independence because it gave people an option not to have to buy a gas-powered vehicle.

And he also is sending rockets to space more efficiently, effectively, and affordably than NASA was able to do. And they now hate him because he’s going to say, “Hey, you know what? Maybe it’s not a bad idea to allow people to make their own and share their own opinions.” That’s what they’re upset with! Buck, they are angry because Elon Musk is not going to be censoring enough on social media.

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

26 Apr 2022

Recent Stories

Clay Counts Victories Against the Left

26 Apr 2022

From Florida Republicans pushing back against Disney and the far-left’s sexualizing of kindergarteners to resisting Biden’s inflationary spending and Elon Musk liberating Twitter, the right is resurgent. Clay appeared on Hannity with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) to rank our victories, but remind us not to get complacent.

Recent Stories

Buck Discusses Musk, DeSantis, and Trumperdamus

26 Apr 2022

Buck Sexton discusses Elon Musk buying Twitter, says the Biden administration can be summed up by classic ’80s movies, Disney can just build their own Florida if they don’t like DeSantis. All with a look forward on Trumperdamus.

Recent Stories

It’s Official! ELON MUSK BUYS TWITTER

25 Apr 2022

CLAY: Breaking news! We need to add a breaking news sounder to the show’s audio here. I was hoping we’d get to announce this before the show ended today. Twitter has officially been purchased by Elon Musk. The news literally just broke within the last minute or two. They have stopped the trading of Twitter stock. I am reading directly from CNBC.com.

Headline: “Twitter Accepts Elon Musk’s Buyout Deal. Twitter’s Board Has Accepted Billionaire Elon Musk’s Offer to Buy the Social Media Company and Take It Private — The announcement…” I’m reading directly from CNBC. “The announcement ends a week-long saga kicked off when Musk offered to buy the company at $54.20 per share.”

They adopted a poison pill in an attempt to find another bidder, but this is now official. They have announced… This is a massive, massive win, Buck. For people who value an open marketplace of ideas and believe in a robust debate, this is exactly what our country has needed. We’re starting to stack some dubs, I’m telling you –

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: — as sanity is starting to return.

BUCK: This is huge, folks. I honestly believe because there’s also gonna be some second-order effects on some of the other platforms who are gonna realize, you know, right now the system is: You say something on YouTube — let’s say about masks — that’s true but they say it’s not true — you put that same content on Facebook, you put that up on Twitter; they all ban you, right?

And so where do you go? You had nowhere to go, basically. Rumble. I mean, there’s some startups and some places where you can go. But you don’t have the same reach yet. I wish those companies well. I use them and we post on them and we’re trying to help and be a part of that too.

But when one of the megaplatforms, one of the big players already is going to allow free speech, that’s going to be such a market advantage that Facebook now, when they do their, “Oh, you violated our terms of service guidelines.” You’d be like, “All right. So, I’m just doubling down on Twitter now,” and that’s gonna have a huge impact ’cause I think they’re not gonna be able to continue.

When everybody is in on the censorship game, when there’s censorship collusion, it’s easy to crush an idea like “masking on planes is moronic,” which it was, by the way. But now they won’t be able to do that anymore. Not the same thing, assuming Elon follows through on everything he says.

CLAY: Well, it seems… It’s a done deal, fait accompli, according to the reports. They stopped the trading of the stock.

BUCK: No, I mean if he does it when he’s running it.

CLAY: Oh. Yeah, he’s bought the company. Right. We’re hoping.

BUCK: This is In Elon We Trust, Clay. That’s what’s going on here.

CLAY: Yeah, right. And, look, you’re talking about a guy who is the most influential, powerful person in the world now. When you look at running SpaceX, running Tesla, and now owning Twitter, Elon Musk is the most powerful person in the world, and I hope that he is going to live up to the First Amendment ideals that he has continued to espouse.

Man, if he does, this changes everything, and obviously a big topic I’m sure we’ll debate and discuss it tomorrow, Buck, will be what’s gonna happen with President Trump’s account? But go on down the line. What’s gonna happen to the Babylon Bee, to Alex Berenson, to the innumerable people that have been banned?

BUCK: Do we have to throw a “Welcome Back, Berenson” party here on the show?

CLAY: We need to get him on tomorrow.

BUCK: I think we gotta have a, “Welcome back, Berenson,” moment here ’cause we’ve been trying to get Alex’s word out there to the world. Soon he’ll be able to do it on Twitter.

CLAY: What a day.

Recent Stories

WaPo’s Lame Defense for Outing Libs of TikTok

25 Apr 2022

CLAY: If you paid attention to the controversy surrounding the Washington Post attacking the Libs of TikTok account, this is kind of a significant story here, because the Libs of TikTok Twitter account basically just grabbed all the crazy things — many of them, frankly, are teachers, but – that left wingers are saying, and shares it for the audience at large.

And so the Washington Post decided they had to do a deep investigation of this Libs of TikTok Twitter account — and also TikTok account and Instagram and everywhere else — and here’s the Washington Post’s intrepid, lying reporter, Taylor Lorenz, talking about why that was so important to do.

BUCK: Fascinating, isn’t it, that anonymity for social media users is so subjective when it comes to who the left thinks should be able to be anonymous online and who they think should be unveiled using the resources of the second richest man in the world, Jeff Bezos, and his Washington Post to do so. Notice the “it could be a foreign power.”

This is just playing to the deranged Democrat mind about “Russia! Russian information operation! Trump and the Facebook pages” and all the rest of it. All you have to do is say, “Oh, it could be a foreign influence!” First of all, they love foreign influence when it actually hurts their political enemies. They could care less about it.

And then the notion that somehow what Libs of TikTok — by the way, they are just running Mark Meadows text messages on CNN. They’re just gonna do this all day. I’m seeing this over my screens here. It’s funny. Anyway, they’re going to keep pushing that because they have nothing else to push just so they’re clear on it so they’re hoping that this is somehow a distraction.

But back to Libs of TikTok. Libs of TikTok just shares what is already being shared. This is the amazing part of it, and I would have everybody note: If you go and look at this account — and it’s also on Facebook now and the videos… You know, the Libs of TikTok brand, so to speak, makes its way onto Facebook and Instagram. You go and you see these videos.

It’s not that the left says, “Oh, that’s terrible, we don’t stand for that or this isn’t something that we would ever say.” They just attack the sharing of the content. It’s not that when they hear a teacher say really off-putting stuff about what kind of gender identity training 5-year-olds need, the left says, “This isn’t representative. This isn’t actually what we believe.” No. They just say, how dare you go after trans people in this way. Well, it’s just letting a trans person in some of these cases — or a pansexual person or a cisgender, nonbinary I don’t know.

CLAY: Imagine that even these phrases exist, right? I mean, like you’re running through them. To your point, who cares if it’s a foreign actor if all they are doing is taking people’s opinions and sharing them with an audience? You’re putting your opinion out there. It doesn’t matter who’s running this account. They’re just holding up a mirror to how crazy the left wing in this country has become, and the left wing doesn’t like that mirror being held up and reflected so that people around the country can see how crazy they’ve been. That’s what this really is about.

BUCK: I think they also are recognizing that this game they play of… What they used to think they could get away with is, “That’s not happening. That’s not what’s really going on.” Because of Zoom at home instruction parents are now attuned to this ’cause they’ve seen, and there’s a whole awareness. There’s an awakening among parents about what their kids are actually being taught.

And that’s why… Here’s a perfect example. I mean, we’ve just gone through the Parental Rights in Education bill thing. Here’s an example of what is going on right now versus what’s the left would like to be happening. They say that Governor DeSantis in Florida is banning math textbooks, for no reason. They say he’s just banning math textbooks. That’s the storyline. That’s the talking point.

The reality is that the Florida Department of Education is picking which textbooks they’re going to actual distribute to children in schools, and some of them contain… “Banning,” just so everyone knows, would be we can’t buy this book. If you have this in the state of Florida, you’ll be arrested, or this is banned to be sold. That’s banning.

Not choosing someone’s book is not the same as banning a book. That’s for starters. So they’re lying to you with that. But this whole notion of social, emotional learning, which has become much more prevalent in the public school system and chief commissar — what’s her name — Randi —

CLAY: Weingarten.

BUCK: — Weingarten. Thank you. The chief commissar of the schools is out there talking about all this stuff. DeSantis said, “Math is about getting the right answer. We want kids to learn to think so they get the right answer. It’s not about how you feel the problem should be or to introduce some of these other things. There’s a right answer and a wrong answer.”

Clay when you look at some of the social emotional learning, it’s bizarre. There will be a math problem: “What is a quarter plus a third?” and then below it will be, “Oh, like, how does this problem make you feel? Like, does this, like, address the social issues of society?” It’s bizarre what they are doing in some of these curricula.

CLAY: No doubt, and did you see the video that went viral this morning from Good Morning America? Speaking of the conflict that exists between Disney and the state of Florida, they had a — I believe was — a transgender kid doing a catwalk on Good Morning America. Like, this is really getting… Again, under 18. This is really becoming more and more of a commonplace story — and, by the way, Good Morning America is on ABC which is owned by Disney. It’s hard to make the argument that Disney isn’t in some way, as a larger corporation, complicit in trying to normalize this.

BUCK: I saw that video, and hat tip to I think it was Matt Walsh who was sharing it out there. And, obviously, again, this is just the content that’s out there. This is not even editorializing on it per se. This is just, “Hey, guys, remember this clip from ABC, one of the biggest…” I mean, GMA, the whole thing, it’s, “Oh, let’s just have everybody watch. Like, a little bit of news, a lot of, you know, ‘Oh, this is how you make the best summer salad,’” right, as opposed to be, you know —

CLAY: Totally unthreatening television, is what —

BUCK: It’s just pablum. It’s just meant to be the easiest sort of show. Anyway, the child in this case looked to be about — it’s a boy about, what — maybe 10 years old, something like that?

CLAY: -Ish, I would say.

BUCK: Maybe 8 or 9, doing a drag show. And when you see the video — and this on Good Morning America on ABC which is owned by Disney and millions and millions of people are watching. You have a little boy dressed up in a glittery gown with a big wig on and a boa swaying his hips side to side and dancing in a way on the ground that is inappropriate. I mean, I don’t know what else to say, Clay. You see this, you say, “What the heck?” But because there’s this whole, “Oh, no, it’s a celebration of…” Of what, exactly?

CLAY: I just come back to, we don’t let in our household our kids pick very often the food that they eat. I have a 14-year-old and 11-year-old and a 7-year-old. Because if we let them pick every meal that they would eat, then they would not be remotely healthy. And I’m not sure it’s saying they’re the perfect approximations of health when it comes to what they eat already.

We’re far from perfect. How is it that…? Virtually, by the way, every patient is the same way, right? You have to in some way help control what your kids eat, particularly the young ones, right, when they’re in elementary school. How is it that the same parents who won’t let their kids pick what they eat are supposed to be okay with letting a kid pick their gender when they are 10 or 11 years old?

I refuse to consider this to be normal, and that’s what they’re trying to do. They’re trying to normalize this idea that young the kids — way before they’re adults — can decide that they are a different gender that they were born and that they can be expected to have surgery to address their being the wrong gender. This is truly child abuse, but it’s also a form of insanity, Buck.

BUCK: I think the left has actually gone over the cliff here, and they don’t yet fully realize it, but most of America is saying, “Oh, no, you’ve actually gone over the cliff, guys. This is too far. This is not intellectually or ethically defensable,” and they’ve gone over the cliff with any number of things, with the male competition in female sports the NCAA at the highest level, right?

They’ve gone over the cliff with defending teaching 5-year-olds about transgenderism and gender identity, which it’s fascinating because absent that instruction, how many transgender 5-year-olds are there? Apparently zero. But all of a sudden with that instruction, we’re told, you’re bringing out what was already there. Based on what, exactly? Where is our…? It’s absurd.

CLAY: Kids are so susceptible.

BUCK: Yeah. They’re brainwashing kids. And the problem is now they’ve recognized that their only way through this is just to keep doubling down and saying, “No, this is a civil rights struggle.” Really? The civil rights struggle to tell your 5-year-old in public school — without your knowledge as a parent — that, you know, you’re not really a boy, you’re a girl? They’ve had teachers hide some of the early transitions from parents. Think about that.

I mean, who do kids really belong to? Family. They don’t belong to the school system. They don’t belong to chief commissar Randi Weingarten and the Biden administration and all the mediocrities around him who are actually calling the shots. But we keep saying it: Everybody out there, you have an opportunity here — you, listening, anywhere in the country — to do what you can between now and this election to send a message.

I’m not saying it’s gonna make all the problems go away. Clay and I are both realists. We know there’s a lot of stuff. We’re gonna have to hold the Republicans to account if they do get a majority, you’re still gonna have jackass President Biden running things. But at least we can point to it and say, “The madness has been turned back for now.” We can do this — we can do this!

Recent Stories

Dr. Oz Joins C&B to Make His Case: I’m Not Gonna Let You Down

25 Apr 2022

BUCK: As you know, the Senate is critical. We’re looking really good in the House, but we got to pick up some Senate seats, my friends, to really box in these leftist loons, shut down the progressive agenda, and get ready for a big presidential win in 2024, right? Step by step. That’s how we gotta do it. Pennsylvania, the Keystone State you could say — the keystone in that process, Clay. It’s that, maybe…?

CLAY: What a wordsmith you are.

BUCK: Kind of works? Yeah. We’ve got Dr. Oz with us now. He is running for Republican Senate — Republican Senate seat in the great state of Pennsylvania. He’s in the primary right now. Dr. Oz, thanks for coming to hang out. We appreciate it.

DR. OZ: You’re welcome, Clay and Buck. It’s a joy to run for the Senate here because there’s so much opportunity. I tell you, you want to be optimistic in life? Go talk to Pennsylvanians about what we can do if we get the government out of their hair.

BUCK: So, Doc, I gotta ask you ’cause last time you were on, we had you on, and, I mean, Clay and I were both struck by… You know, you’re hitting the right notes, we know conservative folks all across the country; we know it’s top of their mind. You’re saying a lot of good things. You are getting some heat from the right, though, from people who are saying, “Is he the real deal?”

And they play clips from your show from years ago or they say, “Well, this is what he said then; this is what he says now.” What do you…? We want to give you an opportunity. What do you say to that, to anyone who says do you really believe…? You know, they may be hearing all the right things from you now, do you believe all these things? How did that transformation come about?

DR. OZ: I 100% believe it, and listen: I host a show like you host a show. You have people who come on the program that you don’t always see eye-to-eye with but if you’re on network television, my job is to preserve the First Amendment, to have people on that I don’t disagree with — agree with or disagree with — that I may not even like. But my task is to make sure people are exposed to ideas.

I have been a conservative person; I have been my whole life. But I tell you President Trump very simple for everybody. He said — I’m gonna quote him – I’m “smart tough and never let you down,” and he wrote that announcement himself. Listen, I get this stuff. I understand the facts around covid, around energy policy. I know what’s wrong exactly with the school system, health care.

That’s gotta be self-evident, but you gotta be tough to fight for what matters. And I’m not gonna let you down. He said it on purpose because my whole life has been about going to war on things that matter. I have risked — and you know what this means — everything to go to battle with Big Tech, Big Pharma, big chemical companies. I took on the U.S. government.

I have the scars to prove it. I cannot be bought. So you don’t have to guess what my history is. See where those battles took place, see how much they trying to cancel me. When I came out at the beginning of covid — ’cause my show is in a hundred countries and people are calling me from other countries and say, “Hey, you should try this or that.”

And I would share those ideas when the woke media didn’t like it and would hammer me. I remember I went on Sean Hannity’s show and talked about the fact that no one was closing their schools in other countries; we shouldn’t close our schools. It doesn’t make sense that use your kids as a shield, medically speaking. And I just got torn apart for that.

From primarily the left but I got attacks from everywhere. It didn’t matter to me. It was the right thing to do. And the last word of the Star-Spangled Banner, remember that word, “home of the brave”? I played football in college, and I would wait for word to run out on the field and, you know, you get relaxed when you’re running around. But that word always struck me, so important, because you cannot be free if you’re not brave. I’ve taken brave positions throughout my career; I’ll continue to take them as senator from Pennsylvania.

CLAY: What does it mean to have Donald Trump’s endorsement in Pennsylvania?

DR. OZ: Gargantuan. Massive impact. And it’s not just that it makes campaigning easier because even more people come to watch you and, you know, folks who are, you know, not sure about or open their minds and come listening to you and become converts. But also President Trump has a very clear vision of what America First means and when he says, “Oz shares that vision…”

When he says, I’m pro-life, and I’m strong on crime, the border, election fraud, the military, and when he says, I will always fight for our under siege Second Amendment — by the way, he said all those things — that elevates me in the eyes of a lot of folks. Because there’s a massive advertising campaign against me. That’s, by the way, why so many conservatives aren’t sure because they’ve been $30 million primarily Wall Street money spent to tell them that I’m not what I say I am.

So it takes a little effort. I’ve been in front of me for many, many years, they know exactly what I am if they’ve watched the show, everybody else is figuring it out as I weather these storms. But I’ve had President Trump say I’ve looked carefully at all the other candidates, other people that Oz is competing with, I checked them all out, and he is the one I chose.

And he came out to do a teletown hall on Friday and really went at this issue. He said the other candidates were claiming I support them; I don’t. It’s Oz. There’s other candidates who are pro-China who will sell us short on China. Oz won’t. Oz — and that, by the way, China is a big issue for everybody. We take our eye off the ball as conservatives sometimes while we’re talking about all these other topics.

China needs to destroy us because they have a system built on a surveillance stay, authoritarian that has an economy at a works. We’re the only competition. We have a democracy obviously that has a capitalistic system that also thrives. So the entire world is watching the battle between the behemoths and China is already at our throats. They’re already trying to take us down. They’re cheating, putting university professorships in.

Taking patented technology, their disinformation is massive. All this, by the way, happened because they know that if they can sink us, they’re the only option for the world. So we’re not just fighting over the soul of Pennsylvania or even the nation, as you hinted at the beginning. I’d be the tie-breaking vote in the Senate. But also, the entire planet needs us to thrive as a nation.

BUCK: Speaking to Dr. Oz. He is running for Senate in the state of Pennsylvania and so, Doc, on the economy because that’s what this midterm election more than anything else, all the polls — we don’t even need polls, we just know, right? What is the top concern of voters in a moment like this, it’s gonna be inflation, it’s gonna be the cost of living.

It’s gonna be a sense of economic malaise, stagnation, perhaps even stagflation going forward. We’re $30 trillion in debt. We have Democrats who openly say — and I mean Biden himself — that by spending more money we’ll bring inflation down. What do you think? What would you support if you were fortunate enough to be the Senator from Pennsylvania as an economic strategic to get us back to where we are in 2019 when we were asking ourselves, “How can this greatness just continue?”

DR. OZ: Energy, energy, energy. When I travel around the commonwealth, if you get coffee at a diner, the woman as he can be you will sit next to you and lecture you better than Joe Biden could about why energy policy has to change. It’s a dramatic driver of inflation because gas prices have rocketed up. It also provides incredible value because of the standard of living within the communities where we allow, for example, natural gas to be pulled out from the ground.

And it makes us energy independent and dominate so that we can negotiate with allies and enemies with a position of strength. We can also help our allies by shipping our natural gas over there. Let me give you a stat that’s gonna blow your mind. If I took the natural gas under my feet here in Pennsylvania — which, could power the entire country for 200 years, by the way — and I started to ship it overseas to replace their sources of energy?

It will be the equivalent of electrifying every vehicle in America, plus putting a solar panel every roof in America, plus they bring wind energy production. So if you really like environmental if you’re a sportsman, if you treasure this planet you should be rooting for natural gas. The question is why didn’t Joe Biden do anything to encourage energy production!

Why is he still forbidding licensing of federal lands, which is our land? It’s all of ours. That’s one-third of our energy sources are under federal land. Why is it that he won’t give confidence to energy producers that he’s not gonna let middle-level, unelected bureacrats pass regulations to sink massive pipeline opportunities? Why is it that New England still imports natural gas from South America instead of getting it from Pennsylvania?

Because we are blocked from shipping it there! These make no sense. To dramatically drop inflation if we do this, but you also help the country. Why the Democrats don’t get this is simple because they believe in the false narrative of the Green New Deal, which — I’ll speak as a scientist — is impossible. It will not work on in the timeline outlined. We’ve gotta open our eyes and do what’s right from a scientific perspective but also the humanitarian thing for our people and for the rest of the planet.

CLAY: Dr. Oz, you obviously… We just talked with Rand Paul in previous hour of the program, and he has been an absolute fighter on taking on Dr. Fauci, on a lot of the misguided issues surrounding covid. The more doctors that you can speak out — as you said, you spoke to out on Sean Hannity’s show about lockdowns and kids not being in school and everything else.

One of the things that Buck and I care about the most — and certainly a lot of our listeners do in Pennsylvania as well — is needing people to be steadfast, not the Mitt Romneys of the world when it comes to not requiring masks on airplanes, not putting masks on kids, all of those things. Can you a hundred percent tell us, “Hey, I will have your back in the back of the people in Pennsylvania and also the nation when it comes to never allowing any lockdowns to ever occur again?”

DR. OZ: Clay, I’ve been on the record for this over and over — and you should ask Rand Paul, who I’ve had on my show and I’ve visited him, hundred percent agree with his approach to Fauci who… I’ve called for Fauci’s firing because he’s incompetent, and I’m not the only one who thinks it. Other public health officials think it. Scientists were censored by him.

We all have questions about this process, some of us like me and Rand Paul more aggressively believing mandates should never happen because they don’t work — and there’s more and more data now from Hopkins, for example, proving they didn’t work. But the Democrats create a false story here. They say, “How many kids you gonna let die by not putting masks on them?”

Well, that’s a impossible question to answer, but it’s a false question. That’s not gonna happen. Masks do not keep kids alive. And because they don’t affect kids period. Thankfully, kids do really, really well. (chuckles) Kids don’t have a major problem with this. If they do get infected, they tend to be superbly well if they’re healthy and it doesn’t change whether they get sick or not based on whether they wear a mask.

So the Democrats manufacture a story that tied Republicans in knots — and this is something I pledge to you. Not only as per President Trump said I will not let you down but I’m gonna gonna walk into the culture war knife fight with three-by-five, neatly arranged index cards. This requires us to roll our sleeves up, take our jackets off, and fight in the trenches where the culture wars are won and lost.

And this is what the Democrats have been doing, Buck. They’ve taking over media. They’ve taken over our universities. Now they’re going after our kids. And they’re starting to get industry to be censored. When you see things like Disney taking a position against I think a very rational law in Florida — which is their decision to make — about whether they want to teach, you know, gender issues to 7-year-olds.

Which I don’t think makes sense ’cause you don’t teach calculus to 7-year-olds either. It doesn’t think… They can’t process it. But why are corporations getting involved in these things? There is a censorship happening at a very, very deep level that we have to stop. The biggest complaint… I did these big rallies all over Pennsylvania. The biggest complaint is people, Republicans, don’t feel like they can say what they see. They don’t feel comfortable expressing what they know to be true in their hearts. That’s why we will win big in November, because that really bothers Americans.

CLAY: You’ve got 3.8 million followers on Twitter. Right now, we’ve been talking a lot about today, Elon Musk — the potential of him buying Twitter. If it happens, what would you like to see Twitter look like going forward?

DR. OZ: Twitter should not be able to arbitrarily and secretly censor people. They should not be allowed — and this is has happened to me in different settings and probably many folks have experienced this. All of a sudden, your post is missing and you don’t know why, and they can’t explain it. It has to be an open formula. I liken it to the telephone lines. It’s a common usage issue.

In order to talk to each other we are using Twitter. That’s, hey, good thing for the company if they treat it correctly but it’s a sacred obligation if you’re the phone lines that the phone lines go everywhere. You don’t not deliver phone service to Democratic hopes or Republican homes. Everyone gets to have a phone line. That’s what, to me, keeping the America’s First Amendment intact translates to.

So I will fight with every ounce of energy I have to deal with the censorship that’s happening in social media and encourage all these companies to not specifically come after bold, loud Republican voices, because that’s exactly where I’m gonna be in Washington and I don’t want to get censored any more than you do.

BUCK: Dr. Oz, he’s running for Senate in Pennsylvania. Doc, thanks for being with us. Appreciate you, sir.

DR. OZ: God bless you both. Take care.

Recent Stories

Sen. Rand Paul Talks Mask Mandate, Predicts Hunter Biden Indictment

25 Apr 2022

CLAY: Pleased to be joined now by Senator Rand Paul from the state of Kentucky. He is in Nashville at the airport that I’ll be flying out of here in a couple of days to head down to Florida celebrating — at least for now — the victory over masks that has been given to us by a brave and courageous Florida district court judge who applied the actual law. Senator Paul, what do you think of that opinion, and how pleased were you that it finally came out?

SEN. PAUL: It was a great day for travelers, a great day for Americans, and a great day for those of you who believe that your liberties come from your Creator and they can’t be taken away. A majority can’t take them away, unelected bureaucracies like the CDC can’t take ’em away, and so we’ve been fighting this. I’ve filed lawsuit in Kentucky about a month ago on this.

I fought this on the floor of the Senate. We finally had a victory on the floor of the Senate about a month ago. And finally — you’re right — a brave justice or judge down in Florida actually ruled that, guess what? Congress never gave the CDC the power to do this. In addition to whether they have legal authority, there’s no medical evidence that the mandates have reduced the incidence of disease.

BUCK: This is the quote: “This is a CDC issue. This should not have been a court issue.” That is what Fauci said just a few days ago.

SEN. PAUL: Let me reword it and speak so we can all understand: He’s saying he’s concerned that your constitutional liberty will be considered when he puts forward mandates or edicts that are based on his opinion. So, he doesn’t want the courts involved, but the courts adjudicate the Constitution and your liberty.

So, when he says he doesn’t want that, basically what he’s telling you is, that he wants it to be an authoritarian edict from an unelected person like him that is not reviewed or questioned by anybody in the public. Thinking about that statement, people should really give consideration to: Do we really want to empower people like Fauci to have so much control over our lives when they have such utter disdain for the constitutional liberty we should be able to enjoy?

CLAY: Senator Paul, you obviously are running for reelection in the state of Kentucky right now. There are a lot of battles that are gonna be taking place in both the House and the Senate, also a lot of governor’s races. What does it mean from your perspective…? I’ve asked you a couple of times, I think, but I believe it’s significant for you to tell our audience. A Republican Senate and a Republican House means what for Dr. Fauci come 2023?

SEN. PAUL: It means that I promise — and I absolutely will follow through on this promise — that I will subpoena every last record. He will have to appear before my committee under oath. We will bring in all of the people who discussed covering up the origins of the virus. We will look at all of the documents unredacted. We are going to get to the bottom of this mainly…

Not so much to attribute blame, although I think there’s significant blame to be had for Fauci and his cronies, but to make sure this doesn’t happen again. If this came from a lab, we should acknowledge it, and then we should look at this type of research. I will bring forward scientists who are not partisan, not politically motivated, and we will discuss gain-of-function research.

And we will ask the very important question: Should this type of research be done in the United States? Should it be done internationally? Should we have an international convention — such as the one we have on nuclear weapons and chemical weapons — to ban this type of research so we don’t have this happen again? So we’re gonna ask all of these questions, but number one on the list is: We’re gonna subpoena all the records and get to the bottom of this.

BUCK: Speaking to Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky. Senator, we also wanted to get your take on the situation as it pertains to the Biden administration right now and Hunter Biden. The laptop, the stories that are coming out make it seem increasingly clear that there was some access, influence, pay-to-play scheme going on in the past.

We know the media lied about the authenticity of the laptop. Some are calling for a special counsel. Do you agree with that, and do you think this is a headache that the Biden administration — and even the Democrat-aligned press — is gonna have a hard time ignoring for the rest of the year?

SEN. PAUL: You know, I fully expect there will be an indictment. I think Hunter Biden will be indicted, and I think that ultimately there are people in the Department of Justice who actually aren’t political partisans. Now, we’ve gotten a bad sort of flavor in our mouth about government entities such as the FBI, the Department of Justice with all the politicization and people using those agencies for their own purposes.

And I think the top of the DOJ is tainted with politicism with Merrick Garland. But I have to believe that there are at least some mid-level people looking at this investigation who will prosecute him the same way that they went all after Manafort for similar sort of things: Taxes and being a foreign agent, et cetera. I would think that without question there’s enough evidence that he did every bit of what Manafort did or more.

CLAY: Senator Paul, first of all, that would win me a steak bet with Buck and he’s already nervous about —

BUCK: Oh, man. I’m sweating now.

CLAY: — you now coming down on the side, ’cause I agree with you. I think there’s enough evidence out there that he is going to be indicted. But I want to circle back around to your press conference here at the Nashville airport today. How concerned are you about the appeal to the 11th Circuit that the Biden administration the Department of Justice has undertaken, and that while right now you can stand in an airport without wearing a mask — and basically all over the country you can fly without needing a mask on an airplane — that it might be reinstituted before all is said and done? What do you anticipate going forward?

SEN. PAUL: Yeah. This needs to go all the way to the Supreme Court, and we need a final ruling so they don’t do this to us again. Basically, the CDC has only power that Congress delegated to it. Congress never delegated a power to the CDC that said they could force everybody in the country to wear a mask when traveling. That power was never given to the CDC.

That type of law would not pass Congress. I can tell you, the Senate would not pass such a law. It would get almost no Republican support and not enough to get it out of the Senate. Same with the House. They might be able to pass with a simple majority, but it was never done. The CDC does not have this power. And there’s a parallel argument.

The eviction moratorium with where the CDC said you didn’t have to pay your rent, you didn’t have to pay your car, you didn’t have to pay your house mortgage. That was struck down by the court ’cause the court said, “We looked at the statute, and the statute doesn’t give you the power to do that.” So I think the same thing applies here.

But I think it needs to be fought all the way to the Supreme Court. And we need to make sure that this so-called power the CDC has is adjudicated and this is found to be something they do not possess that power. I am happy today and I’m seeing a lot of happy faces out there. When this was announced and United held up a sign at the end of a long flight the other night that the mask mandate had lifted? Spontaneous applause.

CLAY: Yeah.

SEN. PAUL: We do not like these mandates and they medically have not saved any lives. The masks are not effective, and so it’s not just a freedom argument. There’s also a medical argument to be made that the random used controlled studies — such as the one from Denmark, the DANMASK study — showed no correlation with health.

BUCK: Speaking to Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky. Senator, do you think that we’re gonna have more and more people from within the medical community who are willing to speak out on that issue? Because one of the great frustrations for some of us — and Clay and I are in this category — who have seen just the inconsistency, hypocrisy, and absurdity of a lot of these mandates from the beginning, is that a lot of people with MD in their title are too scared to speak out, unwilling to speak out.

Obviously you’ve been speaking out and you’re a medical doctor. Are you seeing a wave of others come along? Because it feels like, until people understand broadly that all of this was just harassment and failure and overreach, there’s always this possibility that it could come back.

SEN. PAUL: The problem with public health and with university doctors in general is that people gravitate into these fields who are people who have a propensity to authoritarianism, to left-wing politics. So, if you look at professors in general — like poli-sci professors or any kind of academic tradition — they’re like 75, 80% or more Democrat. The same would go for public health doctors and university medical doctors.

So there tends to be a tendency towards Democrats and liberal Democrats filling these positions. But there are some good doctors out there” Jay Bhattacharya from Stanford has been a very sane voice on this, Martin Kulldorff from Harvard, Scott Atlas who worked for Trump. There have been a lot of good voices on this, and they’ve actually started a new think tank at Hillsdale College, which I think’s going to be a great addition to scientific thought.

But the bigger, broader question here is, scientific inquiry and scientific truth comes about through disputation. You have to be able to argue your point. And if we better than certain types of speech or certain ideologies – like, if you think climate alarmism is an extreme point of view, then you want to question that, you’re now backhand from social media. So we have to have an open debate, and what I say is quit any forum that doesn’t allow for open debate. We should not participate in people who hate the First Amendment and who hate the concept of freedom of speech. We just shouldn’t use their forums.

CLAY: To make that be brought home to our audience, Senator Paul, you remember this. We had an interview with you that YouTube refused to post because they didn’t like some of the conversation in our discussion. And with that in mind, I’m curious what you think about the possibility of Elon Musk taking over Twitter. What could that mean? Are you optimistic about the changes that he could bring to bear there?

SEN. PAUL: I am worried about the psychiatric treatment that will be required for all the left-wing nuts that work at Twitter –

CLAY: (laughing)

SEN. PAUL: because they’ve gone completely insane. I think they’re pulling their hair out. I think they’re very nervous at the concept of freedom of speech. And so we should be loud and clear that those who are for censorship are from the left. But, yeah, I quit YouTube. I don’t use YouTube anymore. I haven’t pushed a new video since I quit them.

I may have old stuff up there, but I have posted new videos. I post all mine on Rumble.com and I’m for any competitor to Big Tech. And my goal is really to leave some of the others. I may stick around on Twitter for a while and see if Elon Musk buys it and we get our freedom back there. But if not, eventually I’m gonna leave all of them.

BUCK: Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky. Senator, always appreciate you hanging out with us on the show. Thanks so much.

SEN. PAUL: Thanks, guys.

Recent Stories

Trump Drives Libs Nuts at Ohio Rally

25 Apr 2022

BUCK: Here is what Trump said in Ohio over the weekend. I wanted you to hear it because the left has certainly lost its mind.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Our new slogan was “Keep America Great.” The problem is is they’ve done such damage, we cannot really say right now — and very sadly — that America is great. We’re not respected anywhere. We’re not listened to. It’s very sad what’s happened. So, we’ll say “Make America Great Again Again.” Okay? But you have to vote for America First Republicans.

There is no better proof that our country is being run by a deranged group of extremists than the treacherous crusade against American energy and Ohio energy. You see what they’re doing to your energy and your energy industry with their fake Green New Deal policies, Biden and the Democrat socialists have done what our worst enemies could never, ever have dreamed of doing to our country.

BUCK: He’s gonna be a voice you’ll hear a lot out there, folks.

Recent Stories