×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Abbott and DeSantis Take Action on Title 42

7 Apr 2022

BUCK: Let’s just put this all into context before we get into what’s being done today and going forward about it. The Border Patrol believes they can handle — without really losing their ability to do the mission of border security, the national security mission, the humanitarian mission, they can handle — 5,000 apprehensions across the entirety of the U.S.-Mexico border every day.

The number’s already at about 8,000 apprehensions a day. So remember, 5,000 isn’t what they would like. That is their believed max capacity before they have portions of the border with no agents able to do any apprehensions. That’s where that fentanyl runs through, that’s where the cartels are focusing their operation — and it is believed that when Title 42 ends it will get up to about 18,000 a day, 18,000 illegal migrant crossings into the U.S., violating U.S. federal law, entering on U.S. soil by numbers that we have never seen before.

And this would be an all-time high. This is from Biden’s own DHS, mind you. This isn’t some partisan thing. It’s not some, you know, Republican member of Congress who’s making noise about this, although they’re doing that, too, but it’s not some fringe belief on the internet or anything like that. This is Biden’s own DHS. Obama’s former DHS chief, Jeh Johnson, is saying this is completely unsustainable. This is going to swamp, overwhelm the system.

So some governors are finally willing to do something about it, if nothing else, to raise the public’s mind-set, consciousness of this issue, because my baseline theory is the Biden administration and the Democrats don’t mind illegal immigration. They actually like illegal immigration. They view it as future Democrat voters. They also get to virtue signal on about how we’re “a nation of immigrants.”

Well, nation of illegal immigrants is what they mean, or what we’re talking about. And now we’re seeing that they’re gonna try to hide, I think, the flow coming into the country. And so that’s what they want to do. They’re gonna make the processing once Title 42 goes away streamlined so that people come in very quickly, are released in the interior very quickly.

They might even be transferring people to central hubs for illegals to then be dispersed, transferred from there. I’ve seen the facilities that exist along the border, Clay, like McAllen. It looks like a city. I mean, it’s just enormous facilities for processing immigrants.

They already have those set up. So the governor of Texas and the governor of Florida, both of them, Abbott and DeSantis, are taking action on this one. Here is Governor Greg Abbott of Texas announcing that the state of Texas will begin to send illegal immigrants to Washington, D.C., by charter bus.

ABBOTT: To help local officials whose communities are being overwhelmed by hordes of illegal immigrants who are being dropped off by the Biden administration, Texas is providing charter buses to send these illegal immigrants who have been dropped off by the Biden administration to Washington, D.C. We are sending them to the United States Capitol where the Biden administration will be able to more immediately address the needs of the people that they are allowing to come across our border.

BUCK: I like the messaging, Clay, but this is messaging, because the people have to actually agree to get on the buses. But he’s getting people talking about it; so I like that component.

CLAY: Well, there’s a fear that is rapidly spreading. We talked about this, Buck. I just don’t understand how the Biden administration can have reached this conclusion because already the border is one of their weakest polling points for not only Republicans and independents, but also Democrats, which is why, Buck, we have got Senators directly issuing in the Democratic Party statements saying they disagree with this.

Did you see Kyrsten Sinema just did it in Arizona? You’ve got Senator in New Hampshire, Hassan, who is on the ropes, potentially, depending on who the nominee is gonna be. Nevada, we know how tight that one is gonna be. Georgia, Warnock, the poll came out from The Hill yesterday that showed Herschel Walker if you’re listening to us right now in the state of Georgia, up 49-45 in that race.

By the way, Stacey Abrams down either five or seven points in that race, depending on who the gubernatorial nominee is going to end up being. Buck, it’s not just Republicans, to your earlier statement, that are pointing out what a disaster this is gonna be. It’s a bunch of Democratic Senators. And obviously a lot of those Senators who are up for reelection in purple states and swing states are saying:

“This is absolutely bonkers that they are making this decision,” because you know how poorly it’s going to work out. And it just reinforces the incompetence of the Biden administration, particularly because they chose to have this end on May 23rd, right when there would typically be a crest no matter what the rules are.

The word is already spreading all throughout Latin America that this is the time to go for the American border, and we’re going to see a surge the likes of which we have never seen before ’cause you add in the covid issue that slowed down travel over the past couple of years, and this is a recipe for disaster at the border the likes of which we’ve never seen.

BUCK: Not just Governor Abbott of Texas. Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida also saying that they’re gonna bus illegal immigrants that are dumped in Florida by the federal government to Biden’s home state of Delaware.

DESANTIS: If Biden is dumping people, which he has done — people they fly in at 2 in the morning, they haven’t done it lately but they did it month months ago — we now have money where we can reroute them to sanctuary cities like Delaware, and we’re gonna do that.

BUCK: Again, this is about optics, but optics influence politics and we are in a midterm election year. This will absolutely not — and, by the way, the governors Abbott and DeSantis don’t think this is going to do anything to stop illegal immigrants from coming into the country. They have to agree. It’s a voluntary transfer on the buses anyway. They’re not even in custody.

I don’t even know how many will go, to be honest with you, Clay. But it does get us and others at least talking about the issue and bringing up the hypocrisy here because we all know: Nancy Pelosi’s family is not going to deal with an influx of illegal immigrants into the community and all the needs and all the tax resources and everything that will go toward them.

It’s not gonna make a difference in the private schools that, you know, the Bidens or the Obamas or you name any Democrat royalty send their children to. But I think the American people will also feel — and this goes to your point about why are Democrat senators concerned about this, right? ‘Cause their party is all for it.

CLAY: Lots of them.

BUCK: And a bunch of them. ‘Cause they realize this is a huge weakness for them right now politically. A lot of Americans are struggling. The gas price is super high. Inflation’s super high. Economy is not what it should be. Everything is more expensive. And we’ve gone through this period of hyper-government bureaucracy telling you what you can do, where you can go, wear a mask, get a shot, do all this stuff.

And the attitude of the federal government, the Biden administration to illegal immigrants is, “How can we make this process as easy possible, as beneficial as possible. Let’s give them Obamacare access. Let’s give them in-state tuition. Let’s do all these things.” People who are working hard to try to pay their bills, of all backgrounds, by the way, you look at different ethnicities in the polling, you look at African-Americans, Latinos, you know, and everybody else, and illegal immigration is not popular with the American people.

Illegal immigration is not popular. Why should people get away with cutting through the legal immigration line and then demanding more and more additional benefits when their whole status in this country’s illegal in the first place? People recognize there’s something really bothersome about this, especially when folks are struggling to pay for the gas in their cars and the food on their table.

CLAY: Pretend you’re in the Biden White House, Buck. You’ve got Democratic senators that are in swing states — Nevada, Georgia, New Hampshire — places where there really could be losses — Arizona — all saying that they don’t support the repeal of Title 42. What in the world is the Biden White House thinking, doing this? And we talked about the hypocrisy associated with the Biden White House is continuing to mandate that people wear masks on planes.

So arguing, “Oh, covid policy needs to be changed because we’re not as dangerous a place with covid for the border,” while not changing the policy for airplanes doesn’t make any sense. What could they be thinking here? I’m trying to contemplate, with the midterms almost exactly seven months away from today.

You are going to, right in the middle of the summer, basically, end of May as we poise to get into the summer, you’re gonna change the law at the border such that almost immediately the border, which has been mostly ignored. It’s gonna be impossible to ignore this surge, I really do think. I think even media that doesn’t want to cover is going to have to cover it. What could they be thinking that this makes political sense for them at all? I really legitimately cannot even conceptualize of what they are gaining by doing this at this time.

BUCK: The zealous left that dictates I think so much of — and look at all the talk we have now about the trans agenda and the fight over Disney and over the parental rights law in Florida and all this. The hard left of the Democrat Party is calling the shots in a lot of ways, and the Biden administration keeps bending the knee to them because that is their base.

It’s also a lot of where their donor money comes from. And I think, Clay, on this one, the only way to stop this would be to show the political will to uphold the rule of law, to turn people back — and also, to do interior enforcement which means, you’re going to have to deport people who don’t show up to their hearings or don’t get asylum. Think about what that looks like to the activist, identity politics left.

The Biden administration is gonna be deporting people? The Biden administration is going to change the incentive structure? So they can’t… To your point, there is no upside to this. But to them it’s the destruction of the base that they’re gonna need to even hold on to pretty blue seats in this midterm; they won’t have base turnout where they need it to be if they did what’s necessary to stop the flow.

And I think they’re gonna play a lot of games with hiding this. They’re gonna send people — they’re gonna change the process so they can change they’re adhering to the rule of law, when really they have turned the pathway for illegals at our southern border to a conveyor belt at high speed, as many as possible into the country.

“Oh, we had a front-line asylum officer do make a five-minute question and answer so, yeah, sure they can come into the country!” DHS is already trying to figure out a way in the rules to do this, Clay. So they’re gonna say they’re adhering to the rule of law, and then they’re just gonna hope people don’t pay attention to the numbers.

CLAY: Have they already recognized that they’re going to lose the House and the Senate and they’re just trying to get things through while they can, and then they’re just recognizing that nothing’s happening the next two years because they’re not gonna have the ability to control the House and the Senate? Just tossing it out there to think about. There has been this argument, “Well, they’re gonna try to rush toward the middle.”

Have the numbers gotten so bad in White House polling that instead of rushing towards the middle in advance of the midterm, has the Biden White House recognized there’s going to be a red tide onslaught and so their only play is, “Whatever we’re gonna try to get done for the next four years has to happen in the next few months,” and they’re not even gonna try to stem that tide anymore? I think it’s an interesting point to think about because that’s the only way that this rationalization makes any sense to me at all.

BUCK: I do think there’s a possibility you could have a Biden White House that, after an annihilation in the midterms, turns around and says, “Hey, so we’ve done some checking on this, and it’s really more like 15 or 20 million illegals in the country, guys; so we really gotta get an amnesty here.” And I know that sounds like a crazy position to a lot of people who are saying, “Wait, but the American people aren’t with them on this.”

A lot of Republicans, big donor money, you know… I’m just trying to get in the mind-set of what Democrats think their move will be here. It may just be to open the floodgates so much that they feel like an amnesty becomes politically inevitable because you have so many millions and millions of people in the country illegally.

CLAY: Maybe that’s it, or maybe they’re just, like I said, recognizing they’re gonna get crushed and this is the last six months that Biden’s gonna have any power at all, and anything that they want to get done has to get down now and they don’t have any hope of stemming that tide.

BUCK: I mean, what are they even gonna get done? What are they gonna get done?

CLAY: Maybe they get a tax increase. Maybe they get part of Build Back Better, they get the border gets opened back up. It’s an intriguing question — and if they are making that calculus, then they’re just throwing all these guys in swing states like New Hampshire, Arizona, Georgia. They’re just throwing them to the wolves and saying, “Hey, we’re not gonna be able to stop the tide anyway. Let’s try to get done what we can.” Just think about that a little bit ’cause it doesn’t make logical sense.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Pelosi Has Covid, Fauci Pins Deaths on Trump

7 Apr 2022

BUCK: I think that we should be past the notion of anybody — any individual, particularly if it’s a asymptomatic or very mild covid case, it being a story. But sure enough, Nancy Pelosi, headline today, tested positive for covid. I don’t… Maybe she let her guard down by not wearing a mask 24/7, maybe two masks, actually. Maybe she should have gotten the fifth shot already, Clay.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: I don’t know. I take the virus seriously. I can’t speak to people like Pelosi who thinks that only four shots is enough and only wear double masks when the cameras are around is somehow going to protect them. But just so you all know, she’s asymptomatic.

So no one thinks that this is gonna be a big deal for Nancy Pelosi, and unlike psychotic leftists — who when Clay and I get sick, tell us that they want bad things to happen to us — we wish good health to all of our fellow Americans and fellow human beings regardless of their politics.

We wish covid would go away entirely. I also wish Fauci would go away from public life. Step out of the limelight, don’t want to hear from him anymore but that’s not gonna happen anytime soon and I think he’s starting to feel the heat, Clay, because he’s getting more explicit about the politics of this. He’s being more…

It’s getting more clear that he really is a political weapon for the Democrat Party to get compliance from people but also to create this narrative of the Democrats did it right, ’cause they were the maskers and the lockdowners and not alone the whole time, obviously. Trump did it in the beginning.

But when we learned more and the data came in, they decided that the data was irrelevant and that we had to “take the virus seriously” by locking playgrounds and arresting paddle boarders on the ocean by themselves and all this stuff. And here is Fauci straight up saying he’s gonna blame Trump.

FAUCI: I can’t quantitate it for you about how many less deaths. You can’t even model that, I don’t think. But there were certain things that were done that if they were done differently, we likely would have had… For example, when we were trying to “lock down,” if you use that word — that’s a very charged word for some people — remember we were trying to get the 15-day and then the 30-day extension during the Trump administration.

And yet he was coming out… Right after we came out and I said with Dr. Birx, “Let’s do the 15-, 30-day;” he would get up and say, you know, “Liberate Virginia, liberate Michigan,” which was just completely contrary and antithetical to what we were trying to do. But if we had really locked down, we probably wouldn’t have lost a lot of people early on.

BUCK: That’s a total lie, he’s an abject clown, and people who believe him deserve the misery and anxiety that they’re gonna live with the rest of their lives “because of the virus.”

CLAY: Well, what should happen in that interview is immediately follow up with, “‘If we had really locked down’? Okay, what do you mean? Do you want Shanghai-level lockdowns? Do you want people unable to leave their house for any reason, they can’t talk their dog, if they step outside, they get arrested?” When you say, “If we had really locked down,” he needs to be pressed on exactly what he means by that.

‘Cause I do think he would have, if he had been in charge, would have gone with a Chinese-level lockdown where no one is allowed to leave their home and basically everything stops. And, by the way, we’d still be doing those, I think, today just like China’s doing them because this thing was impossible to stop.

Sooner or later, it’s going to have to run its course through the American public and the global public. Look what happened in New Zealand and Australia, two island nations that basically made the decision to lock down everything, and then finally recognized, “You know what? We’re going to have to standpoint open back up our country. We can’t do this forever,” and cases immediately skyrocket.

BUCK: Well, look at what the strategy was. The strategy of “15 days to slow the spread,” the strategy of 30 days, remember — with the extension, as Fauci just said — that was about hospital capacity. So they offered this up. Now, this is why Fauci can’t ever show up anywhere with somebody who knows anything who’s going to push him, because all the idiot lib journos go:

“Oh, Fauci! He looks like a grandpa, and he seems nice. So let’s listen to him, he wears a lab coat,” ’cause they’re morons. But it was “15 days to slow the spread” so that hospitals could get ready for then the end of the 15 days and now it’s basically the virus is gonna be pretty much ripping all over the place. And then they extended it. And then they extended it.

And then it was this quasi-mitigation lockdown status until the vaccines and the vaccines would end it. And then we got the vaccines, and that doesn’t end it, either. So they have been wrong all along at every stage of this, and their ideas, their strategy, Clay, doesn’t even make sense, which is why they had to keep changing it, doesn’t even make sense anymore.

But Fauci, notice — notice — the cheap shot at Trump. Okay. Why doesn’t Fauci get asked this question — and we said it many times — how is it that more people died of covid under Joe Biden with a vaccine program in place and actual distribution of 200 million-plus people getting the vaccine than Donald Trump with a more dangerous version of covid initially circulating and very little knowledge and no vaccine?

CLAY: There’s not an answer for that. And, by the way, I agree with you on every single person testing positive shouldn’t still be a story. It is worth mentioning, Nancy Pelosi kissed Joe Biden on the cheek yesterday. Did you see this? She was at the White House, and she kissed Joe Biden on the cheek. Now, Joe Biden is, I think, on like his 90th booster shot at this point like that German guy. That’s obviously hyperbole.

BUCK: Booster, Clay. You’re just not taking the virus seriously.

CLAY: Joe Biden’s been taking the booster shot every day for the last year. But it is worth mentioning that she kissed Joe Biden. And one maybe remarkable thing so far is everyone in the White House, but Joe Biden seems to have tested positive for covid postvaccination. So maybe Biden is going to end up testing positive before all is said and done.

Also, the fact that these continue to be stories is ridiculous. Also, the immediate statement of — thanks to the fact that she is double vaccinated, and quadruple boosted or whatever they all say — she’s experiencing limited symptoms and feels fine. Now, most people that get covid whether they have had the covid shot or not have limited symptoms and feel fine. Particularly… I don’t know how many times Nancy Pelosi has had covid by this point —

BUCK: I think.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: To me when people do all these blue check libs who are terrified, by the way, of the Elon phenomenon now which is —

CLAY: Phenomenal. Yes.

BUCK: They’re actively in panic about it because they know that the good old days of crushing conservative thought and speech in the digital realm may be coming end. But I think if you’re do the tweet that they all do, Clay, when they get sick and they go, “Yes, I have bad cold symptoms, and I feel…

“I’m 35 years old, but I just want to say that if I hadn’t gotten the vaccine, this would be so much worse.” They should have to, like, genuflect, bow down and pray to their god, Fauci when they do that. Like, they should have to make actual penance for not taking the virus seriously enough because it really is a religious observance for them at this point.

CLAY: Well, and Ali talked about this, our producer, when she was talking to her New York City friends and she said, “Oh, one of my hosts got covid; he hasn’t gotten the shot.” They were like, “Oh, my God! He’s gonna be…” No. In 12 hours, I was perfectly fine with the second dose of covid. I had Alpha, had Omicron, feeling fine, and I’m sure Nancy Pelosi’s gonna be fine too. But it is worth mentioning that she kissed Joe Biden. So that might end up being an issue going forward unless Joe Biden’s bionic ability to avoid covid continues.

Recent Stories

We Need a Special Counsel to Probe the Biden Crime Family

7 Apr 2022

BUCK: Welcome back to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show, everybody.

BUCK: I was gonna say, I think it’s gonna be fascinating to see how the media handled the growing revelations about the Bidens. It’s being called “Biden Inc.” Others are calling it “The Biden Crime Family,” because you’ve got Hunter who is obviously — this is now beyond any doubt — running around doing the shadiest, most corrupt influence peddling business deals possible, allegedly not paying taxes on millions of dollars that came in.

He already… I shouldn’t even say “allegedly.” He had to pay a million dollars in back taxes, so clearly he has not paid all of his taxes. That was clear. Will there be criminal reckoning for it? Clay and I see the likelihood of that slightly different, but there was certainly criminal activity occurred. It’s a question of how it is dealt with, how it is handled. Today, the main story on Fox News:

“Biden Inc.: Biden’s Sister to Keep Cashing in on Brother’s Career with New Memoir, Following Family Tradition.” The Biden brother, Joe Biden’s brother, is also now — and who was doing business deals with Hunter Biden? The whole family was setting up this web of influence peddling and all these different ways to just take money.

Clay, if I was trying to come up with a farcical parody version of influence peddling, having the sitting president’s son do finger paintings, basically, and sell them for $50,000 anonymously each, that would be… I used to say this about the Clinton Foundation. I’d say, “Why not just pay Hillary a million dollars for her to trace her hand on a piece of paper?” ’cause that’s basically what they’re doing with these speeches. That’s exactly what Hunter Biden’s doing right now. You almost can’t make this stuff up.

CLAY: Well, and this is a really specific denial. For Joe Biden, who, by and large, has said, “Oh, I didn’t know anything about Hunter Biden’s business interests,” to have Jen Psaki specifically saying that the email that they were sharing office space where Hunter is requesting new keys being made? For her to say that’s not accurate, they weren’t officemates, is a pretty specific level of denial. It’s not even Joe Biden denying, it’s Jen Psaki, meaning they had to have a meeting where he said, “That report’s not true,” meaning they’re now diving into some of these details.

BUCK: Can I ask you…? We didn’t talk about this. Special counsel. Isn’t this why the special counsel statute exists when you have something like this where you cannot trust the executive branch to do the due diligence on itself?

CLAY: I think so, and there’s a couple of other things that are standing out here that I’ll bring up when we come back in this next segment. There’s a front-page article — we didn’t talk about it — in the Sunday New York Times about the attorney general, Merrick Garland. Also, when you’re dodging these kind of taxes, there’s a significant fact here. He didn’t want people to know that he was getting this money.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: We’re just talking as we went to break, listening to Jen Psaki specifically deny that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden and Jill Biden were officemates, which is a very specific rejection of a story that is out there which is based on Hunter Biden’s own emails he sent. And, Buck, I don’t think we necessarily talked enough about the tax-avoidance aspect of this Hunter Biden story because everybody knows Tax Day is not too far away and there are multiple different storylines that are out there about why you could be charged with tax evasion.

One way you could be charged with tax evasion, for instance, is if you have a different interpretation than the IRS for what you might end up owing. What I believe Hunter Biden has done is… Buck, we need to have a real investigation here because I think what’s likely to have happened with much of the money that Hunter Biden didn’t pay taxes on is, he didn’t want the IRS to know he had made this money at all.

And that’s a significant fact here because it would suggest that Hunter Biden may well have known that some of the money he was getting was improper for him to be receiving. For instance, everybody out there, if you’re an employee, you get a tax return by the end of January letting you know how much your employer paid in tax, how much you paid in tax.

You might get a 1099. There’s a variety of different forms that you’re gonna get. Do we think these Chinese and Ukrainian interests were reporting to the United States IRS the money that they were sending to Hunter Biden? Of course, they probably were not, which means that what Hunter Biden was doing was not only avoiding paying taxes.

He was hoping the IRS would never know that he got this money in the first place ’cause it might have been illegal, some of the money that he was getting. And I don’t think that gets talked about enough. Tax avoidance, there’s a variety of different reasons why you could have a tax dispute with the IRS. This is among the most significant.

BUCK: Oh, absolutely. When you’re talking about hiding income, that tends to be the thing that gets the IRS’s attention the most as we’re all heading into Tax Day — and, yes, I despise or tax code.

CLAY: Amen.

BUCK: I think the IRS is often… The whole thing is just a sham, it feels like. I mean, “Oh, yeah, we’re gonna sit down and go through…” They can’t even tell you. Remember Donald Rumsfeld when for many years — not when he was just secretary of defenses — he always included a letter in his taxes, “Look, my accountants and I tried, you want me to sign that all this is correct? I’m hoping this is correct but I’m just letting you know that nobody knows what’s correct.”

The whole thing is absurd. The one thing, though, where they actually do kind of get you and they gotcha is when you’re getting millions of dollars in wire transfers to shell companies or LLCs or whatever and you hide that. And you do that because, as you said, you don’t want people to know about it. Also, you don’t want to pay taxes on it. That’s the other part of it, right? And that’s very, very illegal.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: So Hunter Biden had to borrow, apparently, from a donor a million dollars to pay back — and here’s part of this was where they’re gonna really circle the wagons. Here’s where the firewall, Clay, really goes up. It will be on the issue of any connection — this goes to the office; it goes to everything — every connection between Hunter and Joe. They’re very close. They’d talk all the time. This is the president’s son who’s not running a side business. He’s not running a hotel business. He’s running a “Hey, I’ll get you access to my dad when it really matters” business.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: So this is where all of a sudden when you start to pull all the pieces together, you find yourself in a situation where you can say, “Hold on a minute. This actually implicates…” As much as Anne Applebaum may say this isn’t an interesting story, this has implications for the sitting president of the United States in ways that all the investigations of Donald Trump and his children never actually did.

Nobody was selling, nobody was taking wire transfers from Chinese Communist Party connected or Chinese Communist Party member businessmen, Clay, so they could give 10% to The Big Guy. This is just getting started. I’m telling you, we’re not done here by a long shot.

CLAY: You raise a good idea, the idea of an independent counsel investigation into Hunter Biden. Sunday’s New York Times, front-page story, third paragraph, Buck — because they try to say, “Oh, Merrick Garland is independent!” The third paragraph of the front-page New York Times story which is focused on him. The headline is: “Garland Faces Growing Pressure as January 6th Investigation Widens.”

They’re try to put pressure on him. Third paragraph, Buck. “The attorney general’s deliberative approach has come to frustrate Democratic allies of the White House and, at times, President Biden himself. As recently as late last year, Mr. Biden confided to his inner circle that he believed former President Donald J. Trump was a threat to democracy and should be prosecuted, according to two people familiar with his comments.

“And while the president has never communicated his frustrations directly to Mr. Garland, he has said privately that he wanted Mr. Garland to act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor who is willing to take decisive action over the events of Jan. 6.” Buck, that paragraph is an amazing paragraph for the New York Times to write because effectively what they’re doing is putting what Joe Biden wants to say to his attorney general directly to his attorney general, who one billion percent read this article without Joe Biden having to say it himself.

This is… I read that, and my jaw dropped because it is the New York Times carrying water for the Biden White House to put pressure on Garland while saying, “Oh, we never had conversations with him where we’ve said that!” No. You got the New York Times to write exactly what you think so he would read it without you having to say it yourself.

BUCK: And here’s a reminder that — it’s a rule, really — Democrats accuse the other side of doing exactly what they themselves either have done, are doing, or will do. They accuse Republicans of what’s actually going on within their tent. This happens on countless issues. And, Clay, as we’re watching this play out right now, let’s just remember that Donald Trump having any kind of conversation with…

First of all, his Ukrainian counterpart, Zelensky at the time, remember that? They impeached him over that. Speaking about Hunter. There was Hunter Biden corruption, obviously. There were illegal things going on, clearly. So, sorry. There’s not some special immunity. Now, you could say that you think that political hardball and you may or may not want a president to push the buttons in that way.

But there’s nothing illegal about saying, “Hey, there’s something sketchy going on. You gotta tell us what’s going on here, have your prosecutor look into it.” That’s one part of it. And the other part of it is any conversations that Trump had with anyone within the DOJ sphere having to do with Russia collusion, which was all a lie, all of that stuff, they used that.

Remember the 10 counts of possible obstruction of justice that the Mueller probe came out with? Nothing about Russia, by the way, in terms of Russia collusion. Ten counts of obstruction? Why is it different for Democrats to say, “Yeah, you know, Biden thinks that Merrick Garland should prosecute the former president.”

CLAY: It’s crazy to the degree to which — I read that on Sunday, and it just was such the New York Times carrying water.

Recent Stories

Arrogant Journo Applebaum Dismisses Hunter Biden Story

7 Apr 2022

CLAY: We have seen this week alone a woman fired by New York City for questioning why kids have to wear masks at the ages of 2 to 4 — mother of three, phenomenal question, way better than most of the, quote-unquote, “professional journalists” can ask — and then I saw this yesterday. The University of Chicago was having a symposium on disinformation in media.

I’m not sure what this kid’s name is, but he is a student, I believe, at the University of Chicago, and he stood up and asked a writer at The Atlantic, Anne Applebaum, about the media cover-up for Hunter Biden’s laptop. And, if you haven’t heard this, props to this college kid for asking a better question than you almost ever see inside of the White House press corps, than you almost ever seen in part of the press corps anywhere. And then I want you to listen to the dismissive and the arrogant response of this reporter and Applebaum because I think it perfectly epitomizes the era that we’re living in right now. Play cut 2.

BUCK: “I don’t find it to be interesting.” Well, that’s interesting, ’cause everybody else pretty much does, Clay. And there’s a few things at work here — and, by the way, Applebaum is a Russia-collusion truther and you go back; she’s one of these libs who everything about Trump is awful and worse than Hitler and everything else. But they would rather…

If you’re going to be invited to the Vanity Fair cocktail parties, if you’re somebody who’s going to be treated well by the editorial board of the New York Times, it is better to sound stupid on these things than it is to be truthful. She’s making a conscious decision. That’s a moronic statement, but it’s actually better for her brand to say, “I don’t even think that the Hunter Biden thing is a story” than to admit publicly:

“We suppressed truth before an election as the corporate Democrat-aligned media to throw an election to a guy who now wanders around and looks confused constantly and ancient and everybody knows it and it’s absurd.” But to pretend to be dumb and look dumb than to actually admit the truth. This is on a number of issues, by the way. This is why when they White House gets asked about the transgender swimmer in the NCAA, they go, “Oh, you know, we celebrate all…” It’s like, “Well, no. Do you oppose this or not?” Better to go along with the narrative than to speak the truth.

CLAY: There are 500,000 people who follow this woman on Twitter, and there are collections now of old tweets of her. So, Buck, she said that she found the Hunter Biden laptop to be totally irrelevant and — as you just said — in a really dismissive and arrogant way, she said, “I don’t find it to be interesting.” Well, here’s what she’s tweeted about the Trump children during the tenure of Donald Trump.

CLAY: That is talking about Donald Trump and his family, which is the exact opposite of what she said in response to that kid’s questions. “This is why the president’s son-in-law should be nowhere near the White House,” she said, in relation meetings that Jared Kushner had with other members of the international community. “What is this puff piece about Ivanka Trump doing on the cover of this magazine with zero investigation of her conflicts of interest?”

The Atlantic… So those three things: She went after Ivanka Trump, she went after the Trump children in general and Jared Kushner in specificity, yet she is saying that Hunter Biden laptop is totally irrelevant and “I don’t find it to be interesting.” And, Buck, I’ll just say this:

What would her response have been if one of the Trump sons had been on the laptop doing everything that Hunter Biden has done? It would be a media feeding frenzy, it would have been the number one story out there anywhere, and she would have been covering it to the Nth agree. I don’t know this Anne Applebaum lady at all.

BUCK: I’m familiar.

CLAY: You’re familiar. I don’t know her at all. Okay. So she is to me just emblematic of a larger cadre of journalists that would all respond the same way. And if it were “totally irrelevant,” by the way, why was the immediate response, “This is Russian disinformation!” If it’s totally irrelevant, you don’t need to worry about coming up with a fake lie which is what pretty much are everybody said.

And then the standard is, “I don’t find it to be interesting,” her standard for what stories should be covered in the political sphere? The kid points out 16% of Biden voters, according to at least one poll, did find it to be extremely interesting and relevant to their vote. That is the standard that should apply for journalism, if it’s actually journalism, not whether you’re interested in it but whether the general public would be interested in it.

BUCK: They threw an election, folks. They actually… The problem here, unfortunately, is that they got what they wanted, and so now everything else becomes far less relevant. In the moment that they had to lie to the American people, the journalistic establishment in this country and many of the most well-known names from the intelligence community — which I used to work in.

Many of those names debased themselves and their credibility so that Joe Biden could be president. And it’s even more sad, of course, and really more atrocious when you see what Joe Biden as president as done, right? It’d be one thing if we had gone through this remarkable year, and he had crushed the virus, the economy was just rocket ship, and the border was secure and there wasn’t a huge war in Europe that could have been averted.

It’d be one thing like if it’d been a great year. But at this point, these people lied to stop Donald Trump from being the president for four more years to put in place a catastrophic puppet of a president, which is what you have with Joe Biden, and so unfortunately — and I’ve had to tell people this about Russia collusion as well — the dishonesty works at a certain level, right? We have to talk about it, fight back against it, and at least tell people what’s true.

But they got away with this one and really, we have to focus on is making sure they can never get away with this kind of maneuver again. They talk about election integrity. If you can effectively have — all acting as one voice — people whose jobs were told is to “speak truth to power” and “just the facts” and “democracy dies in darkness” and all that other crap — if they can all lie as if they’d been given the same sheet of music, right?

If they can all lie in the same tone, the same tune, then what’s the point, right? You and I can’t be everywhere. People can’t be everywhere. They have to rely on some level, on some level for there to be a baseline foundation of truth and honesty in our national news media, and it’s just not there. This is what everyone, I think, is recognizing. There are no ethics whatsoever in modern American journalism when Democrats see power at stake, none whatsoever.

CLAY: It’s an arrogant and it’s a dismissive response. I do want to give a lot of credit — and I want to find out who the kid is so we can give him credit by name. That’s a fabulous question, Buck. I mean, it is a well-researched question. It’s a well-asked question. It is something that the vast majority of journalists in their career won’t ask a question that is that well written, that well phrased, that well backed up, and that significant.

So for a college kid to stand up in what I presume to be a crowded auditorium and deliver that question as well as he did, particularly, Buck, because it probably goes against whatever the mainstream ethos is on campus; so he’s asking a question which is not going to be wildly popular, necessarily, with his cohorts, with his classmates.

I think that kid deserves a tremendous amount of credit. That’s why I wanted to start the show with him, because as long as there are people still willing to ask questions like that in college, smart kids like that, I feel better about the future of our ability to hold and speak truth to power.

BUCK: On the Hunter… By the way, he’ll never get a job in journalism. (laughing) Right? I mean, unless he goes to work at Fox or maybe comes to work with us. Should give him an internship. But you know what I’m saying. You know. Just that alone, CNN won’t hire you after that. When you go viral or you have a moment like that where you ask a real question, there are so many people inside these institutions who are vicious and vindictive.

Trust me. I was an intern at CBS Evening News, everybody. I know of what I speak. They were like, “You are not welcome back here after this,” not ’cause I didn’t do a good job, but because they figured out what my beliefs were when I was there. But, Clay, also I think the laptop issue — and this is what this kid is exposing, too. We just see this time and time again where dishonesty is at the heart of the left-wing argument, dishonesty.

They say it’s Russian disinformation. They say the Hunter Biden laptop isn’t really a story. They say it couldn’t be verified. They say they just verified it now. Lies and lies and lies and more lies all the time. And they would rather tell those lies consistently than ever have a moment of truth and honesty with the American people because they are activists.

Their brand is actually not truth. It’s not fact. It’s getting an outcome politically, culturally, and in terms of power dynamics in this country. So this is what I have to remind everybody of. None of the journalists who lied about the Hunter Biden laptop, none of the intelligence officials — some of who I worked for and know — feel badly about what they did.

CLAY: Fifty-one of them.

BUCK: They were successful in the deception, folks. So you want to do something about this? We fight back, we take the fight to them, we take away their power in the midterms. ‘Cause they’ll just keep doing it. They don’t feel badly about it at all. I they could, they’ll give you a Pulitzer to the people that suppressed this story, Clay, just as a, “Take that!”

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: By the way, I want to give credit. We started off the show with the great question being asked at the disinformation conference, ironically enough. Kid who asked the question freshman at the University of Chicago his name is Daniel Schmidt. He’s the senior editor of the University’s conservative-libertarian newspaper, the Chicago Thinker.

Also want to give credit to the University of Chicago for being one of the only elite academic institutions that has fully been committed to the idea of thorough intellectual debate and not allowing this woke culture to dominate. Their leadership has been particularly strong on that issue, and I think that’s probably why they got that kid there and why he felt comfortable asking that question in such a fantastic manner.

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

7 Apr 2022

  • UK Daily Mail: Whistleblower who handed Hunter’s abandoned laptop to congressmen and DailyMail.com reveals he has 450 gigabytes of DELETED material including 80,000 images and videos – and has fled to Switzerland fearing retaliation from White House
  • Daily Wire: Biden Son, Brother Had 150+ Transactions Involving Global Business Flagged As Concerning By U.S. Banks: Report
  • FOXNews: Biden Inc. Biden’s sister to keep cashing in on brother’s career with new memoir, following family tradition
  • FOXNews: Atlantic journalist makes excuses for dismissing Hunter Biden laptop story: Not ‘interesting’ enough to cover

  • New York Post: Here’s a dozen times Joe Biden played a role in son Hunter’s business dealings
  • New York Post: Barack Obama’s humiliation of feeble ol’ Joe Biden – Miranda Devine
  • Breitbart: Barack Obama Backs Internet Controls to Grapple with the ‘Demand for Crazy’
  • Breitbart: Explosive New Documentary: Obama’s Campaign Manager Predicted How Many Votes Biden Needed in Wisconsin – Zuckerberg’s Money Helped Get There

  • UK Daily Mail: Obama takes a swipe at social media firms for undermining democracy as he claims 40% of the country think Joe Biden was elected fraudulently and similar amount don’t believe in vaccines
  • Federalist: Will The Court Allow Special Counsel John Durham To See Clinton Campaign Documents?
  • PJ Media: Durham Filings Reveal Timeline of Conspiracy to Frame Trump
  • Daily Wire: A Brief History Of Kamala Harris’ Word Salads

  • FOX7: Abbott: Texas will charter buses of undocumented immigrants to DC
  • Daily Wire: White House Defends Giving Smartphones To Illegal Aliens
  • Daily Wire: 46,000 Cubans Arrive At Southern Border Over 5 Month Period
  • Breitbart: Gov. Abbott: Texas Military to Begin Mass Migration Response Drills

  • Bloomberg: Biden Warns Amazon ‘Here We Come’ After New York Union Vote
  • UK Daily Mail: ‘Good morning to our new overlord!’: Woke Twitter employees vent their fears over Elon Musk’s vow to make ‘significant’ changes on platform after admitting his $3b investment for 9% of shares is NOT passive
  • UK Daily Mail: ‘Twitter’s next board meeting is gonna be lit’: Elon Musk posts infamous image of him smoking pot as it’s revealed he made $156m profit after DELAYING announcing he had taken a 9% stake in the social media giant – raising the specter of another SEC probe
  • PJ Media: Wealthy GOP Donors Form Coalition to Counter Left-Wing Dark Money
  • CNN Business: NBC News journalists vexed by MSNBC’s move to hire White House press secretary Jen Psaki

  • New York Daily News: Second COVID booster shot extends protection for just a few weeks, study shows
  • Daily Wire: ‘Not Predicting A Real Overhaul’: After Months Of Controversy Over COVID Guidance, CDC Announces A Revamp
  • Daily Wire: California Sent $1,700 COVID-19 Food Stamp Cards To High-Income Families: Report
  • Axios: COVID cases rise again in half the states
  • LA Times: Coronavirus cases are rising again in L.A., San Diego and San Francisco
  • LA Daily News: Why California, some counties are scaling back COVID-19 data updates
  • Daily Beast: Two COVID Variants Just Combined Into a ‘Frankenstein’ Virus
  • Bloomberg: Covid Raises Blood Clot, DVT Risks for Months After Even Mild Infection
  • DNYUZ: Shanghai Seethes in Covid Lockdown, Posing Test to China’s Leadership
  • CNBC: Attorney General Merrick Garland tests positive for Covid hours after event with FBI director, other top officials

  • Washington Post: Is radio in a second golden age? Here’s what the first looked like
  • NBC: Nearly 60% of NYC Voters Say Their Family Would Be Better Off Somewhere Else
  • ABC: ‘Big Oil’ CEOs testify before Congress amid skyrocketing gas prices
  • Daily Wire: ‘Red Tsunami Is Coming’: Kenosha, Where BLM Riots Caused Millions In Damage, Just Elected First-Ever Female GOP Executive

  • Daily Wire: ‘If That’s The Rule, We Will Win’: January 6 Acquittal ‘Enormously Important,’ Dershowitz Says
  • PJ Media: American Stasi: ‘Citizen Sleuths’ Are Ratting Out Jan. 6 Protestors Who Haven’t Been Arrested
  • Federalist: Nancy Pelosi’s Jan. 6 Committee Is Following The Same Pattern As The Evil John Doe Investigation
  • UK Daily Mail: The winning Capitol riot defense? Blame the cops! Government defense contractor becomes first defendant acquitted of all charges after arguing that officers OPENED DOOR to Rotunda and let them in

  • Daily Wire: Joe Rogan Reveals Woke Agenda That School Pushed Onto His 9-Year-Old Daughter
  • FOXNews: Female swimmer who tied Lia Thomas joins Tucker Carlson: ‘This is not OK and it’s not fair’
  • Washington Post: Palm Springs looks to give trans residents monthly cash payments
  • PJ Media: Dick Durbin Leads the Charge to Protect Child Pornographers
  • PJ Media: Democrats All-in on Being the Pervert Option for November

  • FOXNews: MSNBC silent as Joy Reid continues pattern of controversial and bizarre remarks. Joy Reid claimed Republicans were the ‘pro-rape’ and ‘pro-child marriage’ party.
  • New York Post: Black Lives Matter shows how liberal groups weaponize social media censorship
  • New York Post: BLM’s LA mansion sold for 250 percent more than the price of similar homes in the area
  • UK Daily Mail: Why did BLM buy LA mansion for $5.8m from developer friend who paid $3.1m for it just six days earlier? Transaction ‘raises serious questions’ – but founder Patrisse Cullors says criticism is ‘racist and sexist’

  • New York Post: Russian troops heard being ordered to ‘slay’ civilians: ‘F–king kill them all!’
  • FOXNews: Obama claims he had to ‘drag’ Europeans ‘kicking and screaming’ to respond to Russia’s Crimea invasion
  • The US Sun: Putin’s ‘secret’ doctor and dancer daughters hit with sanctions after tyrant dad’s horrific war crimes in Ukraine

  • Recent Stories

    Climate Nuts Want You to Set Your Thermostat to 82 at Night

    6 Apr 2022

    CLAY: I saw this headline, and I thought I’ve gotta get your opinion on this. So this has been out there for a little while, but it’s bouncing around on the internet right now. In order to protect against “climate disaster” there is a suggestion that you should set your thermostat to 82 degrees every night. I cannot even imagine. I can imagine, actually, because when I lived in the Caribbean I lived in one house, Buck, that did not have air-conditioning.

    Sleeping at night with just a fan was incredibly difficult, and I understand some of you out there are older. My parents didn’t have air conditioning when they grew up in the South and they talked about how incredibly hot it was, and you’d just wake up sweating through all your sheets and everything else. That is an awful way to wake up. That was commonplace for people. Like you — a softer generation — can you imagine 82 degrees?

    BUCK: At 82 degrees? You know, there’s like Bikram yoga or hot yoga?

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: This is like hot sleeping. Like, there’s no way that 82 degrees is… Okay, Producer Ali actually knows about this stuff. How hot…? It’s like a hundred degrees in there, right, in the…? Oh, more. She’s saying more. Okay. So I’ll make you… I’m a big wimp, 82 degrees, whatever. The point is, it’s really hot at 82 degrees. The thermostat gets above 73, and I start to get a little sweaty.

    I’m just saying, it needs to be, for optimum sleeping temperature — and of course the men and women in the audience are gonna have… Oh! The gender binary is real, by the way, because men tend to tolerate colder temperatures. We have more body fat or whatever. I don’t know. We just can handle colder temperature more. But really it should be 68 to 69 degrees for optimal sleeping, maybe even go down to 67. That gets a little chilly. Anything above 72, it’s just uncivilized. Just hard to sleep.

    CLAY: And they want you to leave your house set at 78 during the day. So you and I are not people who sit around us and worry about global warming and climate change and what it’s gonna do to the planet.

    BUCK: Zero. Zero worry about.

    CLAY: You and I spend zero time worrying about it at all. I’m the same way, and similarly, I can’t think of anything in terms of a comfort level in the house, 82 degrees is pretty hot.

    BUCK: By the way, no one is going to do this who is pushing it, but there are some people who’ll be like, “I want to save the planet,” and they’re actually gonna be sitting there just dripping, dripping with sweat all night and eventually they’ll realize, it’s not a good idea.

    Recent Stories

    Joe Biden Caught in Lie About Hunter’s Business Partner

    6 Apr 2022

    CLAY: Buck, Joe Biden has claimed that he didn’t know any of Hunter Biden’s business associates, these people that he was making millions of dollars from in Ukraine and also making millions of dollars in China from. However, Joe Biden wrote a letter of recommendation for one of the sons of Hunter Biden’s business associates, a Chinese man whose son was trying to get into an Ivy League school on the East Coast.

    Now, you can certainly say, “Oh, I’m sure Joe Biden writes lots of letters of recommendation. It probably wasn’t very detailed.” But what I believe as we continue to kind of pull the thread on this relationship between Hunter Biden and Joe Biden and the potentially illegal, potentially criminal relationship that Hunter Biden had in Ukraine and in China, how many people have you written a letter of recommendation for in your life, Buck, that you didn’t know at all the kid or the person that you might be recommending?

    BUCK: Yeah. Zero. But also, to be fair, I’ve written zero college letters of recommendation because I want the people that I’d like to get in, and I don’t think it would be helpful for right-wing provocateur Buck Sexton to be writing a letter of recommendation.

    CLAY: (laughing) My point on this is, to me, doing a favor like this is not something that you do for every single person on the planet, right? There is a level of familiarity that has to be involved in even asking for this letter of recommendation.

    BUCK: Biden would say no, I mean, ’cause there are people who — you know, I remember when I was working at a think tank, the Council on Foreign Relations, by the way, which is a lot of conspiracy theory stuff around that place. The requests… There were kids applying for internships — and I’m being serious — monarchs of foreign countries would fax in letters of recommendation to get them a job there.

    So, I’m sure they didn’t really know them, but somebody new somebody who would write it. So that’s a thing that could happen. But, no, look. It’s important. They’re lying about China, obviously. We’re gonna keep following the Hunter Biden situation, obviously. But I’m sure Joe would just say, “Eh, I don’t remember.” The problem is, he probably doesn’t.

    Recent Stories

    Jan. 6th Defendant Found Not Guilty on All Counts

    6 Apr 2022

    BUCK: This is from BuzzFeed, breaking news reported here: “January 6 defendant Matthew Martin found” just now “not guilty of all four misdemeanor counts he faced. Judge McFadden found that Martin’s defense that U.S. Capitol Hill police officers allowed him to come into Capitol was plausible,” was real.

    CLAY: That’s good.

    BUCK: So here’s a guy who was charged, and he goes, “Look, Capitol Police waved me in to the Capitol,” and the judge is like, “Yeah, actually, that is what happened,” and, by the way, this guy did not commit any violence, did not attack anyone, ’cause we’re always led to believe that everybody who was there hit cops with bricks or sticks or whatever; you gotta get charged. But you wandered into a building the Capitol Police were saying, “Hey, come this way.” I don’t know. This guy’s walking a free man right now.

    CLAY: Well, that’s good news for people who are willing to challenge it, right, Buck? Because there are a lot of people out there who have felt compelled from the full weight of the government coming down against them to go ahead and take a plea agreement of some sort. So, that is an interesting reaction and result for sure, and I would imagine whatever defense that defendant brought to bear will be examined by others who’ve been charged with crimes in a similar degree.

    Recent Stories

    Ken Cuccinelli: How Zuckerberg Rigged the 2020 Election

    6 Apr 2022

    BUCK: What happened in the last election? We have to know exactly what happened so that we can also prepare for this upcoming one. Were there any things that happened that were a violation of law or that were just unethical, unfair? I know a lot of people are shouting, “Yes!” Well, let’s get into the specifics of it. David Bossie, who is the president and chairman of conservative advocacy group Citizens United and was 2016 deputy campaign manager for Trump.

    He has a new movie that just premiered yesterday, Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump. We have the trailer up at ClayAndBuck.com right now… And one of the experts who appears in it is the former attorney general of the state of Virginia, Ken Cuccinelli, who is with us now. Ken, thanks for calling in.

    CUCCINELLI: Hey, my pleasure. Always good to be with you guys.

    BUCK: So, let’s start with just the overview here of this movie, seems to — The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump is in the title. What exactly did the CEO of Facebook do in the 2020 election? I mean, Rigged is the title, so obviously a lot of people are paying close attention.

    CUCCINELLI: So, 2020 through two (audio drop) 501(c)(3)s, which most of us typically think of as charities, he funneled over $400 million to finance government election offices and his explanation was, “Well, we just want to help them do their job better.” Well, that’s just sweet, isn’t it? Except there were strings attached. Some of the strings were so substantial that literally their own personnel went in and ran election offices, for instance, in Wisconsin.

    And so you literally had situations in densely populated Democrat areas — Philadelphia, Detroit; Madison, Wisconsin, other places — where offices were operating under the rules given to them by Mark Zuckerberg’s outfit, and those rules included what amounted to Democrat voter turnout. So instead of the government in these locations being a neutral arbiter, the analogy I would use was the basketball ref.

    They were paid by one team to do their job the way that team told them to do it, and that included get-out-the-vote efforts which are absolutely fundamental for both parties in trying to win elections. And you had the government doing the Democrat Party’s job with the funding of Mark Zuckerberg. Clearly the numbers show it tilted the scales dramatically. You may recall that some people thought it was peculiar that Joe Biden beat Donald Trump at the same time Republicans picked up around a dozen House of Representatives seats.

    Well, how does that happen? Because the “Zuckerbucks,” so-called, were concentrated in already Democrat areas. So they had already had Democrat congressmen. There was nothing to be gained by the Democrats in Congress by this spending, but there was in the presidential race. But in the other district where Zuckerbucks didn’t have an impact, Republicans actually beat the Democrats to an extraordinary degree from a historical standpoint.

    CLAY: Ken, appreciate you coming on. Do we have any sense for what the plan is of Big Tech as we are now almost exactly seven months out from the midterms, is this almost exclusively a presidential-fueled move on the part of Big Tech, or do we anticipate something similar being brought to bear in terms of the midterms this year?

    CUCCINELLI: So from the things we’ve learned so far, it’s pretty clear they thought this wouldn’t be discovered this quickly, that they would do this for several years before anybody figured it out. And, of course, it was figured out almost as it was happening, not fast enough to stop it. So thus far, about a third of the states have banned or severely limited the use of these kinds of grants — including on a bipartisan basis, by the way. Everybody recognizes how unfair this is.

    And, you know, that leads to a lack of confidence in the outcome of the election because it looks and feels like cheating. There’s a reason they name the movie Rigged, because it was, and I think Steve Moore in the movie says they legally stole the election (chuckles), which is a clever way to say it. But steps have been taken and they’re continuing to be taken to make sure that the referees aren’t allowed to be bought again in the future and that government does have to play a neutral role, unlike what it did in many places in 2020.

    BUCK: We’re speaking to Ken Cuccinelli, former attorney general of the state of Virginia, about the new movie just premiered yesterday, Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump. That trailer is up at ClayAndBuck.com right now. If you check on it, you’ll see it right there. Ken, how are we looking, then, going into this midterm election where the polls are — and we try not to have too much early celebration on our minds here about it.

    But the polls are looking disastrous for Democrats going into this midterm. But how are we doing? Democrats ant gonna go down without a fight, we know that, even if they fight dirty. They love fighting dirty. How are we doing with, you know, the mail-in balloting situation, drop boxes, people that are there to check and make sure that everything’s on the up and up at the voting centers? I mean, how are we prepared this time versus in the 2020 election? Have fixes been made?

    CUCCINELLI: A lot of fixes have been made in a lot of states. I would say we have years of work ahead of us. If you think back to Bush v. Gore and what a disaster Florida was shown to be in that 2000 election, it wasn’t fraud. It was just incredible level of incompetence and inconsistency, and it took them years to clean that up — that’s just one state — including firing a lot of people that needed to be fired. But that’s a three, four, five-year undertaking.

    So we’re in year two of trying to clean this up. And in Florida, it hadn’t become a political football. Everybody agreed Florida needed to be cleaned up. Now the Democrats — or at least the radical left part of the Democrats — treat election reform and transparency and security as (chuckles) an attack on them, because they want incoherence, they want incompetence. They can hide their fraud in it, and so they really don’t want it cleaned up so they can’t really say that.

    So there is a fight over this. It has become a lot more partisan than it used to be. But down at the state level ,real progress is being made. As I told you, Zuckerbucks bans in Virginia and Kentucky, for instance, passed in the last month or two were done on a bipartisan basis. If you just put a random hundred Americans in a room and ask them the details about how to run an election, overwhelmingly we’d all agree with each other. This is common sense. It isn’t partisanship. But it’s become partisan because the radical left and their media allies have turned their attacks on effort to clean up elections because they think dirty elections advantage their side.

    BUCK: The movie is Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump… Ken Cuccinelli, sir, thanks for your work on this. We appreciate you joining us.

    CUCCINELLI: My pleasure. Good to be with you.

    Recent Stories

    Rochelle, Rochelle! CDC Director Pushes 4th and 5th Shots

    6 Apr 2022

    BUCK: We’re gonna be diving into the fourth shot. It is already here for covid, and the CDC director is like, “You are probably gonna need a fifth shot in the fall.” And I just want to know what the Vegas betting odds would be that you’re probably gonna need another booster three months after that one, maybe less than that, which would take you to shot six, if my math is correct. We’ll get into this in a minute. Clay, you are going to be a full six shots behind before you turn 44. I don’t even know what happens at that point, you know, you just —

    CLAY: I don’t know. I mean, do I have to be a pincushion? You saw the German guy who got 90 shots, right?

    BUCK: He takes the virus she seriously.

    CLAY: He is the envy… Fauci was like… Oh, I need you to do your Fauci voice.

    BUCK: (doing impression) We need in China the drones to actually just be saying, “Don’t go outside, do your part for the virus-suppression campaign. Your little Fido, don’t worry about, Fido will just go on the floor. Don’t worry about it. It’s about droplet suppression.” Those drones could be coming soon to a neighborhood near you unless we all finally wake up and realize that Fauci is wrong about all this stuff.

    CLAY: What’s funny about this and also incredibly sad, Buck, is the Chinese people are pointing it out. They have a dark humor joke that they make on their social media because they get canceled if they say anything that’s too inappropriate. But they say that in China now, you can die of anything as long as it’s not covid.

    And it’s a dark humor joke because people are dying left and right of all different sorts of diseases that aren’t covid, but it also raises a question, Buck, we’re over two years — 2-1/2 years — since covid emerged in China at least, and they’re still locking down. How long does this go on? Because it’s not as if covid’s going away.

    BUCK: What you see is the reflection here of political ideology and this public health apparatus, what it actually means. When there is an inclination — which is obviously an extreme one in the case of communist China — to control people, not care what they think, not care how they suffer, to just have top-down control, covid is a great excuse for that. And you’re seeing the people that want to control every aspect of life in China at the top of the Chinese Communist Party, they’re still using covid.

    This doesn’t bother them. They don’t care about the suffering that they inflict ’cause they say that it’s for the greater good. And in this country the Democrats who are the party of the State — as in the big S state, the leviathan, the control of your day-to-day lives — they embrace this as a tool not only for controlling people, but also for trying to remake aspects of society. They haven’t been entirely successful on that thankfully in the areas where they’ve tried it.

    But they got much further than I anticipated. This is one of the places, Clay, where I’ve admitted, I overestimated the American people overall when it came to their desire for freedom and their willingness to call bullcrap when they see it. A lot of people in these cities are still acting like Fauci is their patron saint. And so when they hear CDC director Rochelle Walensky saying this, they just say, “All right. Gonna get another shot, I guess.”

    BUCK: What do we think the chances are that they’re going to say this fall, “Yeah, you need another booster”? ‘Cause here’s what’s gonna happen. The booster probably will raise that antibody level, as we know, for a few months and you’ll have some enhanced protection if you’re at risk for those couple of months, maybe, hopefully, and then it will wane, and people who are on shot four are gonna start getting sick and start going to the hospital even though they’ve gotten four shots.

    And then they’re gonna say, “Time for shot number five,” and also in order to sort of cover for the failure of the policy before, they’re gonna tell everybody, “Well, some people have to get fifth shots because they’re at such risk. Don’t be reckless. Everybody needs to get their second booster now across all age-groups.” That’s what they’re gonna say.

    CLAY: And what is going to become a bigger topic, I think, is when is too many shots going to start to limit even the effect of those shots? Because take it outside of the world of vaccination, as most people understand, the more your body is exposed to something, the less significant, typically, the impact becomes over time. I don’t know what the answer to this is, but, Buck, if you and I had come on in our first shows that we were doing together in June and we had said:

    “Hey, the covid shots that everybody’s rushing out to get right now aren’t gonna work that well, and you will be on your fifth shot by the time we get to the fall of 2022,” they wouldn’t have allowed that opinion to be shared. You couldn’t have said that on social media. You couldn’t have come on and said, “Hey, I know covid shots are going in now, but the first two shots are not gonna last.

    “You’re gonna need a third, you’re gonna need a fourth, you’re gonna need a fifth.” This is never going to end, and so people are gonna have to make decisions. Are we going to get shots every three months for the rest of people’s lives? The one thing I will say that is a positive — I do think it’s worth mentioning — is BA.2 hasn’t really shown… I should probably knock furiously on wood right now, but this new BA.2 variant, Buck, that has been such a prominent factor in Europe for sure, has not arena shown up in major numbers here in the United States.

    I was reading in the New York Times this morning, their opening morning newsletter was like, “Hey, why isn’t BA.2 a bigger issue in the United States right now?” My theory — and they gave several theories — I’m hopeful it’s because we finally have so much natural immunity ’cause everybody got it.

    BUCK: For covid despite all the craziness.

    CLAY: Despite everything, that’s the only thing that’s saving us, I think.

    BUCK: Just in case you’re wondering if Fauci tires of coming out to saying (impression), “I don’t know when, I don’t know where, but at some point we are all gonna die.”

    CLAY: (laughing)

    BUCK: If you think he’s gonna get tired of that, you’re wrong. Here he is.

    BUCK: “Out of the woods of seriousness.” First of all, notice, I think that is the first time… He might have mentioned it another time. That’s the first time I can remember Fauci referring to immunity from infection when it comes to covid. I haven’t really heard him saying it. If he’s brought it up, it’s always been to downplay it in favor of vaccinated immunity. Here he’s like, “Well, fortunately…” I mean, Clay, when they finally do the numbers, if they ever do — they’re never going to do it ’cause they don’t really know — 60 or 70% of the country ended up getting covid of one of the strains.

    CLAY: I think it might even be higher.

    BUCK: When you think about what we went through and you think about how many people got exposed to this and how many high-risk people got exposed to it even though we are supposed to be protecting our whole society by standing six feet apart in an elevator that’s 6-1/2 feet wide.

    I mean, the whole thing is absurd and yet here he is telling you we can’t tell if there’s gonna be another variant and then everything may have to change again. We have to look back at what’s happened with the variants that have already been in circulation and say Fauci was basically wrong about everything. The health establishment will never recover the credibility that it’s lost.

    CLAY: How many friends do you have, Buck, that have never had covid? I don’t even know… Like, people around my age, I almost know no one who hasn’t. Even some of the people who say, “Oh, I don’t think I had it, they’re like but I had a small fever, they just haven’t gotten tested.” I hardly know anyone. I don’t know any parent that doesn’t have either them or their kids having had covid. Most of them have had both.

    BUCK: We were told — and they never went back on this. They just stopped talk about it because I think it conflicted. It was always about the messaging and getting people to comply and keeping this feeling going. You know, Clay, there is a brilliant… Thomas Sowell is one of my favorite conservative, contemporary conservative writers and thinkers. And this was just out from an account that shares Thomas Sowell quotes.

    Which he’s got so many you go, aw, yeah, that’s a brilliant one. This is from Thomas Sowell. “Virtually no idea is too ridiculous to be accepted even by very intelligent and highly educated people if it provides a way for them to feel special and important.” Now, he wrote that years and years ago. That is a perfect encapsulation of what the pajama-wearing, Zoom-from-home, “everyone else who’s an essential employee has to go to work while I can just sit at home and take selfies with my mask on ’cause I take the virus seriously,” they were willing to believe lunacy, I mean, sheer lunacy —

    CLAY: Still are!

    BUCK: — and still are — because it made them feel good about themselves. Into because it made them safer necessarily, not that it actually made any sense, but they got to think, “I’m a good person because I’m doing what the good people do.” And you have people that have, you know, very high IQs, very high brain power, et cetera, who look like utter morons on this because the vanity was the single biggest compelling factor for them, the vanity of double masking at home alone.

    BREAK TRANSCRIPT

    CLAY: Now at least many cases of defense of the regime is what goes on. In other words, late-night talk show hosts you’re around may age, certainly if you’re older, you remember that Democrats and Republicans were equal opportunity for ridicule. Amazingly, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, who are probably the biggest ridiculable, if that’s a word — I hope it is; if it isn’t, it should be: the biggest ridiculable — combo of all time, potentially, Buck, in terms of just comedic opportunities that both of them regularly provide to anyone who is trying to mock the existing political infrastructure.

    Well, it’s been almost nonexistent for both of them as well as for all of this covid absurdity where you’re being told one thing one day, another thing the next day, and all of it’s being delivered as if the experts are never wrong. Well, you know people are getting tired of it when Saturday Night Live — who, Buck, we’ve played a couple of clips of them ridiculing the covid world — and also now even Jimmy Fallon, who is probably the least adventurous in terms of mocking everything, out there, had this to say about CDC and covid.
    FALLON: After taking on criticism for their handling of the pandemic, the CDC has announced plans to revamp the agency. IT’s like when Domino’s ran those ads that said, “We know we suck, and we’re gonna work on it.”

    AUDIENCE: (laughing)

    FALLON: Remember that? The CDC will announce their plan next month and then a new plan the month after, then go back to the original plan.

    BUCK: By the way, it’s observational humor, really, because that is what has gone on here. I mean, it is a remarkable feat, but the CDC in the minds of Americans who pay attention and still have rational faculty available to them, the CDC is the worst three-letter agency in the federal government in terms of just worthlessness and being wrong. Even beats out the FBI and the CIA.

    CLAY: Yeah, and even the CDC as a collective whole is worse than the NIH’s Dr. Fauci, who is — I think at this point without a doubt — the worst bureaucrat in the history of the United States.

    BUCK: Yep.

    CLAY: I don’t even know who’d be —

    BUCK: Most destructive.

    CLAY: — in the second position right now.

    BUCK: The worst. The absolute worst.

    CLAY: In terms of the negative impact that he has had on this country, I can’t remember a bureaucrat in the United States who has ever been in a worse spot than him.

    Recent Stories