×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares on Parental Rights

19 Apr 2022

BUCK: Here’s a headline from just a few days ago: “Virginia attorney general leads 15 other states in asking Supreme Court to stop race-based high school admissions policy.” A story I want to ask him about, also what’s going on in the state of Virginia when it comes to crime and how other states, perhaps, could bring down crime levels, too, by making smart decisions about prosecution and criminal justice. Attorney general of the state, the commonwealth of Virginia, the state of Virginia, Miyares is with us now. Sir, thanks for calling in.

ATTORNEY GENERAL MIYARES: Oh, it’s awesome to be with you. Thanks for having me.

BUCK: Let’s just start with the race-based admissions case that you are, along with a bunch of other states, writing into the Supreme Court. What’s going on here?

ATTORNEY GENERAL MIYARES: Well, just for your listeners, Thomas Jefferson High School is a public school, it’s a magnet school for science and technology. It’s considered one of the best public schools in the country. It has always been merit-based, which is if you have the grades, if you have the academic background, you are admitted in.

Well, in the name of, quote, “fairness and equity,” the Fairfax school board decided that even though a majority minority, the majority of the students that attended are Asian American, it’s the wrong minority. So we know from communication that had been released that the purpose of the Fairfax school board was changing from a merit-based admissions policy to achieve a certain desired, quote, “racial balance.”

Well, at the end of the day, you have gone a 20-point-plus drop in Asian-American students that attend TJ. And what has happened is, I’ve said before, you know, one of the oldest forms of bigotry is anti-Semitism, but the only state-sanctioned form of bigotry that’s acceptable in America today is anti-Asian bigotry.

And, as I had one parent share with me, “My child has had straight A’s since the first grade and now I’m realizing they’re being denied their dream to possibly attend TJ solely because the fact they’re Korean-American.” And nobody should be having their dreams denied to them because of who they are, and that’s exactly what’s happening right now with Thomas Jefferson High School.

It’s state-sanctioned bigotry, violates all of our principles of equal treatment under the law, and that’s why I filed the amicus brief on behalf of these parents. Certain parents said, “Enough is enough.” Brave parents, they’ve accepted and received a lot of abuse on social media, concerned parents for Thomas Jefferson who filed this suit on behalf of their kids.

And they just want their kids to be treated equally. And that’s exactly what we should be doing, the standard that we should be striving for as Americans, as Virginians; so I’m proud to stand with these parents that are saying, “Treat our kids no differently than anybody else. Let them rise or fall based on their merit,” and I think that’s to be what we should strive for in a color-blind society.

CLAY: Jason, I agree with you, all the arguments that you just made there. You guys have been fighting a lot of battles in the state of Virginia and winning many of them relating to schools. In particular, the masking debate inside of Virginia schools got massively contentious. Obviously, we’re celebrating today on the show the ruling from the federal district court down in Florida, which has effectively ended the mask mandate all over the country for airplanes and trains and everything else.

What is the current status of that mask mandate that it becomes so contentious that you guys ended in Virginia schools almost as soon as you came into office? Have those battles ended? Are they on pause? How would you assess them at this point in time?

ATTORNEY GENERAL MIYARES: Well, they’re largely victorious. We also had a bipartisan bill that essentially confirmed what the governor had signed in an executive order. And so essentially in Virginia we have gone from these mandatory masks on our kids to doing this really radical notion, which is let parents decide. You know, if your child…

If you decided as a parent you want your child to be masked, that’s your right as a parent. But if you’re a child that has asthma or as one parent shared with me, “My daughter wears heavy glasses, they were constantly fogging up, school was absolute misery for her,” You get to make that decision. And we’re kind of at this stage right now I think the pandemic is let’s treat people like adults.

As I’ve pointed out the last time, prior to getting our kids unmasked, the last time our kids had a normal school year was 2019, and the data points we’re seeing right now on the mental health impact this has had on our kids — the two-plus years of social isolation, the virtual learning. We went in Virginia… We have these standards of learning which allow us to really assess how our kids are learning.

We went to prior to the pandemic over two-thirds of our African-American, Latino kids were passing our SOL tests. Now two-thirds are failing. The virtual schooling, the lockdown have had not just a dramatically negative impact on so many people in our society, but it’s the mental health, and it’s creating this… You know, the left talks about inequality. Guess what?

Wealthy liberal parents can afford the private tutor and send their kids to private, in person instruction. It is so many in our society were denied in-person instruction, they were denied the ability of actually being with their classmates, and it has been just dramatic. So we are proud to stand with parents. If there’s anything that we had in our campaign, candidly, it was parents matter.

And that was a big thing for bot Governor Youngkin and myself, is we’re gonna empower parents. And you have too many elected officials — when Terry McAuliffe said he didn’t think parents should have a say in what their kids are learning in school. He said the quiet part out loud, you know, that there are so many people in government who don’t think parents should have a say and want to minimize parents.

We want to empower parents, and that’s the difference between the way we view the world and maybe some other elected officials view the world. And we’re proud to stand with the parents every chance we can.

BUCK: We’re speaking to attorney general for the state of Virginia, Jason Miyares, and Mr. Attorney General, what can you tell us about how you’re gonna turn around some of the rise in crime that’s had occurred in recent years in your state. Notably I remember when Youngkin was running, Governor Youngkin was running against then candidate McAuliffe he said that under McAuliffe’s tenure there have been dramatic —

ATTORNEY GENERAL MIYARES: Yeah.

BUCK: I think it was over 40% increase in homicides while McAuliffe was government in the state of Virginia. People always… You know, we hear about this, we talk about it at this broad, sweeping level. What does soft on crime mean? What has that meant in your state? What are the ideas and policies the Democrats have implemented that have contributed to greater lawlessness and violence in the streets, and how do you turn that around?

ATTORNEY GENERAL MIYARES: Well, just for your listeners’ background, for two years the Democrats controlled all aspects of state government in Virginia. They controlled the governor’s mansion, the state senate, and the state house, and they really pushed this criminal-first, victim last mind-set. They push legislation after legislation that really made it easier on criminals, the early release of violent offenders, ending the mandatory reporting requirement of sexual assault in schools, changing our sentencing guidelines.

You had a parole body that let out cop killers, murderers and rapists some of which had life sentences, they let them back out on our street so the murder rate literally has skyrocketed. We’ve seen also I call it de facto defunding police. When your rhetoric and your language and your policies essentially turn law enforcement to a catch-and-release program, they leave law enforcement.

We’re down… We’re still just trying to get caught up. We’re still down over 300 state police officers, just state police. You go every single major locality, you’re down police. Well, community policing is also a huge component ’cause it builds trust in the community. It gives you information on who are the bad guys of the community that are preying on the vulnerable and the weak.

So they say the only thing you learn from history is nobody learns from history? Well, guess what? We-of-we tried all these policies of this recovering door of violent criminals, getting them back on the street in the seventies and eighties and it led to a crime explosion. We were having a 22-year-straight drop in violent crime from the early nineties through about 2044, ’15, and then we started seeing an uptick in the last two years of the Obama administration.

A lot of it, too, are these local progressive prosecutors, these so-called social justice prosecutors that are deciding not to prosecute entire categories of crime. So when you talk about violent crime, some of your listeners may be aware of that serial killer that shot five people both in the D.C. and in the New York Metro area went after homeless people recently. Well, that individual had 88 prior charges.

He was out on probation for a federal armed robbery charge. He gets picked up on a abduction with intent to defile, breaking and entering of a home, and then possession of ammunition by a felon. The Soros prosecutor, the progressive prosecutor elected in Fairfax County decided to reduce those charges to a misdemeanor. This happened in December of 2020.

He was sentenced in March of 2021; he was back on the street since this was misdemeanor charge with a probation violation pending in Maryland, he was allowed back on the street. In June of 2021. Those killings of those targeted killings of our homeless population started happening just months after he got back on the street. So elections have consequences.

And this criminal-first, victim last mind-set has had a real impact on crime in Virginia. You’re seeing it all over the country where this kind of soft on crime, let’s have a revolving door, let’s have a catch-and-release program… You’re seeing story after story after story of individuals that should have been off our streets and not harming innocent Americans back on our streets, preying on innocent Americans.

And criminal justice reform without criminal justice is not reform. It is only gonna create more victims. And so we are pushing back. We don’t control the state senate in Virginia; so a lot of pushing back on some of these I think really dangerous, quote-unquote, “reforms,” we haven’t been able to repeal. We are putting more money in law enforcement; we are hiring more police.

Our office is aggressively going after organized gang activity as well. But there’s only so much we can do candidly until we make sure we have local prosecutors that actually have a criminal-last mind-set instead of a criminal-first mind-set and it’s a problem all over the country, and you’re seeing in a large number of these areas right now. I can almost guarantee you we’re seeing a spike in murder rates. You also have a, quote, “progressive” prosecutor that’s deciding not to really prosecute violent criminals and you’re seeing the results every day.

CLAY: Thank you for joining us, Mr. Attorney General. Jason Miyares of Virginia. You guys are doing fantastic work there and hopefully setting a template for what can happen in 2022 with how well you guys ran a campaign in 2021. Thanks for the time.

ATTORNEY GENERAL MIYARES: Thanks so much! Have a good one.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Stelter: Musk Will Turn Twitter into a Gutter

19 Apr 2022

CLAY: We’re talking about the Libs of TikTok account and the fact that they’re trying to cancel it at the Washington Post. Well, this is just part of the larger embrace of cancel culture that has all been connected to Elon Musk’s attempt to buy Twitter. Brian Stelter — who, by the way, is reportedly on his way out, Buck, have you heard this? He’s close to losing his show at CNN.

BUCK: (impression) “That’s impossible. He’s an Adonis. No way!”

CLAY: Brian Stelter is concerned that if Elon Musk were to get Twitter, then, man, things would really turn into a gutter-like situation. Here is the man who is soon to lose his job, reportedly, and also a part of CNN+, which is close to being shut down. Maybe talk about that a little bit more. But here’s Brian Stelter.

BUCK: They’re living in an alternate reality here, Clay, where — and there was a joke on SNL over the weekend. I’m not even gonna repeat what the job was but you probably saw it, about, “Oh, this is just so right-wing people can say a word they’re not allowed to say or whatever on Twitter.” We can’t say that a man is not a woman, and a woman is not a man, folks, okay? This is what we’re actually fighting for on Twitter. It’s not so people can be so mean. They’re already really mean.

CLAY: It’s a mean place. But you know what? I actually think what cleans it up is allowing fair fights as opposed to banning people that are winning fights, which is what Twitter does if you’re remotely conservative.

Recent Stories

Why the WaPo Fears Libs of TikTok

19 Apr 2022

BUCK: Here’s the story today in the Washington Post that I want to tell you all about. “Meet the Woman Behind Libs of TikTok, Secretly Fueling the Right’s Outrage Machine,” by a figure that some of you may have heard of. She’s not famous, but she’s certainly infamous in media circles, a Miss Taylor Lorenz, who is, I believe, roughly my contemporary. Clay’s a little older, but roughly my contemporary.

CLAY: (laughing) You make it sound like I’m 74.

BUCK: I gotta get in a shot where I can. Roughly my contemporary, Miss Lorenz. So here we are seeing this piece on Libs of TikTok, and before you say… Clay, what percentage of our audience do you think is on TikTok? I’d say less than 1%. Right? You think that’s fair?

CLAY: I’m not even on TikTok. Are you on TikTok?

BUCK: I don’t post, but I have a TikTok. I follow some TikTok accounts, mostly cooking of meat and some fitness tips, but also steak. There’s all this meat. Like, literally, m-e-a-t TikTok, where you get to see people making wagyus and, you know, the expensive meat that you’ll be buying me when Hunter Biden doesn’t actually get prosecuted.

CLAY: No, I have… I don’t believe I have ever been on TikTok. So, no. If I’m not on it, the idea that very many of our listeners, I think, would be on it… Now, there may be some parents out there that are on it to help monitor what their kids are seeing so maybe there’s more than we’re thinking.

BUCK: So, here’s how the ecosystem works, everybody, ’cause this goes all the way up to the top. Meaning this goes all the way up to the Washington Post, the Jeff Bezos, billionaire-owned Washington Post going after this one account — and here’s why. I’ll actually read from you a little bit of this piece, so you understand why they’re so upset about it.

“On March 8, a Twitter account called…” It’s also on Twitter to be fair. It started on TikTok, and now it’s on multiple platforms, so it has additional reach. “[A] Twitter account called Libs of TikTok posted a video of a woman teaching sex education to children in Kentucky, calling the woman in the video a ‘predator.’

“The next evening, the same clip was featured on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News program, prompting the host to ask, ‘When did our public schools, any schools, become what are essentially grooming centers for gender identity radicals?’ Libs of TikTok reposts a steady stream of TikTok videos and social media posts, primarily from LGBTQ+ people, often including incendiary framing designed to generate outrage. Videos shared from the account quickly find their way to the most influential names in right-wing media.”

Okay. So that’s from the start of the Post. We’ll get to the doxing of this woman in a second. But it’s fair to say, Libs of TikTok — you follow it, I follow it, and now it’s on multiple social media platforms so you don’t even have to have a TikTok account. But the stuff that it shows, it just takes what people who are leftists who announce their pronouns, who I can’t even really…

You have to sort of see some of this. I mean, there are people that truly look like they’re in need of tremendous psychological help. But then they’ll announce that they’re a kindergarten teacher. You know, they have… You have to see it. How do I describe this so people could really understand? It’s insane.

CLAY: Yeah, the way I would describe is these are mostly videos that people are shooting of themselves sharing their opinions, and what Libs of TikTok does is collate these videos and share them with an audience that’s different than the audience that might have otherwise been consuming them, right? Because these are basically far left-wing people usually talking to other far left-wing people, and Libs of TikTok shines a light on what that universe is actually discussing.

BUCK: It’s almost just like retweeting, if you understand in the Twitterverse, how that stuff works. They’re just resharing content that already exists. It’s not cutting in a way that’s unfair to the content. It’s just, “Here’s what this individual thinks,” and this is why this has become to contentious. Because the left with the whole “don’t say gay” bill, the Parental Rights in Education law.

In fact, that is now the law in the state of Florida. Ron DeSantis fighting with Disney, all these issues that started to go against the activist LGBTQ+ groups, the activist groups that push much of this content, this ideology — and the storyline kept being, “Nobody really wants to indoctrinate your kids into gender identity,” right?

“Nobody wants to tell your 5-year-old about pansexuality. That’s just a right-wing lie.” Oh? Libs of TikTok shares accounts from people who are saying crazy stuff about how they actually do want to teach your — and they’re teachers.

CLAY: And teachers.

BUCK: Right. So there are teachers, and this is what’s gotten so much attention. And, yes, some of the content is shared on, you know, Tucker’s show on Fox, Laura’s show, you know, different shows on Fox. We’ll talk about some of it here on this show. So this became a big problem for the propaganda machine of the left because their storyline is, “The right’s lying, nobody wants to groom children or to sexually indoctrinate young children into these gender identity theories at a very young age.

“No one wants to do that,” except for all these accounts of people who are teachers who are saying that that’s exactly what they want to do. So what does the Washington Post do? They have Taylor Lorenz find the anonymous individual behind the Libs of TikTok account to try to cut off this content pipeline, in essence, from the big shows, from the national conversation. She showed up — she showed up, Clay.

CLAY: She’s a reporter for the Washington Post for people who don’t know. Yeah.

BUCK: She showed up at the family members of the anonymous Libs of TikTok woman to ask them questions. This is pure intimidation. Everybody in journalism knows it, but this is what the left does. Remember when they had CNN showing up to some woman who clicked on a Russian Facebook account or something about the election and they’re on her front lawn asking her questions like she’s a bad person? They destroy everyday people to make a political point.

CLAY: Remember when they showed up for people who were donating, like, $50 to the Kyle Rittenhouse’s legal defense fund?

BUCK: Yes.

CLAY: They showed up knocking on the door asking, “Why did you donate $50 to Kyle Rittenhouse’s defense?” doxing these people. That’s a word that a lot of people are not gonna be familiar with that we should probably explain, Buck, the concept of doxing, which is you are otherwise a normal person, right — like you have your normal life — and you may decide to donate $50 to Kyle Rittenhouse.

And you may do it under your own name, not thinking, “Hey, one of the largest media outlets in the world is going to show up at my house and write an entire article about the $50 donation that I’ve made.” You may run an anonymous account that becomes popular, but have a normal life otherwise and not anticipate that you’re going to be investigated as if you’re committing some sort of crime.

BUCK: And look at how easy it is for them. Let’s say you’re Bob the Accountant, and Bob the Accountant gave $50 to the Rittenhouse defense fund. By the way, the now-exonerated Kyle Rittenhouse.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Worth pointing out. Kyle Rittenhouse was innocent, found innocent in a court of law, or not guilty, but effectively innocent because it was a self-defense case, and it was self-defense. You know, it wasn’t like they lacked evidence to understand what had happened. They knew exactly what happened. But let’s say you’re Bob the Accountant, and the Washington Post prints your name, your company, your address, and now all of a sudden your boss, the chief accountant, is getting death threat emails, is getting, “How could you employ this person?”

CLAY: Right.

BUCK: And they’ll say, “Oh, well, it’s a free company, it’s a company, it’s private company, can do what it wants.” Yeah, so you get fired. So you didn’t do any wrong but your boss freaks out and you get fired. They do this to send a message. They do this because, sure, it’s one person, right? But that one person could be anyone, which is why it is so impactful, which is why this is so important to the leftist machinery of propaganda and of making sure that people stay within the prescribed political boundaries.

Because, Clay, there are very few… You know, we do political commentary, right? So if someone’s gonna come at us, fair game. There are very few people whose companies would withstand even a short-but-aggressive political campaign to have them fired. Very few places would say, “It’s so worth having Susie scanning the groceries at our Quik-E-Mart or whatever that we’re gonna keep her even though there are a hundred emails saying they should be fired because of this thing.”

Very few places. So this is a silencing mechanism, right? Now, they could say that the Libs of TikTok account is a public person, but I would want to know, “Well, what are the rules now for any kind of anonymity when it comes to media? Who do they go after? Who do they do not? Wat accounts do they unveil, what accounts do they keep secret?” And why talk to her parents? What does that have to do with anything?

CLAY: It’s a method… Well, and we should mention that the Washington Post reporter who is doing all of this was — within the last month — on MSNBC crying over the fact that people were saying mean things about her online and nobody should have to ever deal with this. I think we have some audio.

BUCK: Here’s how she discusses the situation of bullying online.

BUCK: So she wants special protection —

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: — for journalists to be able to ruin anyone’s life that they choose. We’re supposed to lay off, and here she is ’cause it gets even more sad over this. This is a woman who actively tries to ruin people’s lives for her profession, makes that choice. Here she is when she gets a little heat her way.

BUCK: Oh, stop.

CLAY: She is the worst person on the internet. Buck, she has a multibillion-dollar media corporation backing up her investigation of a random, anonymous account on social media — the direct result of what she’s whining about! She’s showing up at somebody’s mom’s, dad’s house knocking on the door, trying to out them, trying to dox who is running this account because she disagrees with their politics, and then she’s gonna break down in crocodile tears on MSNBC and talk about how unfair the world is?

Look, you’re in the game. We’re in the game, Buck. If one of… Imagine the reaction if one of us went on Fox News and we were like (sobbing), “Sometimes people say really mean things to me on the internet and I just…” We would be… People, rightly, would mock and ridicule us to the ends of the earth. This is the world in which we choose to live. You can’t argue for different standards for yourself ’cause your feelings are upset while you’re trying to destroy other people’s lives like she is.

BUCK: And I would just want everyone to know that the journalistic establishment even though — even though — they’re aware of how grotesque this is at some level to go after families, ’cause this is… By the way, she’s not a first offender. She’s done this to other people. She was trying to get Kellyanne Conway’s I think at the time 14-year-old daughter to give her quotes about the fighting between George Conway and Kellyanne Conway.

She’s horrible, okay? She’s a person of incredibly poor judgment who does destroy people, who does ruin people’s lives. Clearly, she’s aware of how damaging it can be to have the media focused in on you and sharing details about you and she makes a career of that anyway. So there’s really… I think she’s a sociopath.

I really mean that. I think there’s something wrong with her. But understand that the Democrat journalistic establishment wants people like this out there. They want to pretend that the people who work for Media Matters which is extensively quoted in this piece, by the way.

CLAY: Of course.

BUCK: Media Matters is one of the worst organizations in America, and anyone who draws a paycheck from it should be ashamed. All they do is try to destroy people by being dishonest and engaging in propaganda. They are, to borrow from Bill O’Reilly, “smear merchants.” That’s all they do. Right?

There are these entities, though, that if you’re a columnist at the New York Times and you’re a columnist at the Washington Post, you view them almost as like your Mafia muscle. You want someone out there keeping all the peasants in line. Step out of line, maybe… You know, it’s not Paul Krugman or Tom Friedman that’s gonna do the doxing.

But Taylor Lorenz at the Washington Post will handle that for them. They like this. Don’t forget it. They stand behind this quietly. Otherwise, they could shut this crap down in a second. It’s ’cause the left has… We haven’t even gotten into the fact that… Clay, why is it…? Maybe we can come back to this: Why is Libs on TikTok so damaging to them? Why does it…? If it were just fringe, if it weren’t something that actually represented a broader swath of left-wing opinion, it wouldn’t matter, right?

CLAY: And also, if it wasn’t being effective.

BUCK: That’s right.

CLAY: That’s the thing. That’s why they’re coming at them, ’cause they’re so effective.

BUCK: Well, it’s effective because it’s real.

CLAY: Reflecting reality.

BUCK: That’s why they have a problem with this.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Yeah.

Recent Stories

NYC Health Overlords Refuse to Free the Faces

19 Apr 2022

CLAY: I know that a lot of you are listening in New York City, and, again, we have to continue to fight this craziness and this absurdity because it’s not going to completely vanish forever. In fact, the nation’s largest transit system, New York, is still insisting on mask wearing even though it’s now, at least according to the judge’s opinion down in Florida, no longer justified based on the CDC rule. The City of New York is making its own decision. Listen to this.

NY1 ANCHOR PAT KIERNAN: There is no change to the mask policy on the MTA’s busses and subways. NY1’s Louis Finley has details on that. Good morning, again, Louis. The MTA says that it still has the authority to enforce a mask mandate even without this federal mandate in place.

NY1 CORRESPONDENT LOUIS FINLEY: Yeah, Pat, the MTA is saying pump your brakes. You still have to wear a mask today and for the foreseeable future, and that’s because they say they’re following the guidelines from the New York City Health Department.

NY1 ANCHOR PAT KIERNAN: So, here’s the scorecard. The MTA remains with a mask mandate for subways and buses. Face coverings are also required on the other MTA services, meaning Metro-North and Long Island Railroad.

BUCK: Now, if you think Fauci and the CDC health overlords are overrated morons…? Ho, boy! The New York State and New York City health authorities are in a whole other league of stupid, just so you know. I mean, they are absolutely political hacks, and you may as well have a representative from the teachers unions or something deciding health policy here because it has been all politics in New York City and New York State about covid all along.

I guess we’re just gonna have to get more lawsuits going. I think that is the only way to get them to stop is to just force their hand over time, to force the bureaucracy, ’cause otherwise a lot of people in New York City… Look, I’ll say this. I heard from someone on a flight this morning, Clay. She said that she had about 90% of the people on her flight leaving New York City.

All knew that they didn’t have to wear a mask. All wearing masks on that plane. So in some parts of the country where it’s maybe a little purple, if you live in Georgia, let’s say — I’m sure this makes a huge difference. The Atlanta airport I feel like is probably very, very different than it was a day ago.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: The LAX, JFK, the situations in those airports, it’s gonna be a little slower.

CLAY: Well, look, if you really believe masks protect you, then you have the right to wear it, and that’s something that we’ve never really fought against. It’s not like I’m saying, “Oh, the government has to tell you, ‘You can’t wear a mask.'” I think it lets us know who the losers are easier than ever before, but that’s your choice.

BUCK: Yes. I mean, just wear your mask, announce your pronouns, and we all know who you’re voting for.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: This is the way that it works in America today, and I would say it’s always been about, Clay, that we have to have a sort of shared suffering with the mask thing. That’s been the mentality. So, when they’re sitting there… Masking is uncomfortable. Something that people forgot about at some point during this, it seems.

The conversation is that no one wants to wear the stupid thing, it’s annoying, you can’t breathe well, it’s stifling your breath. It pisses me off — and I’m not the only one, obviously — and yet the people that want to mask up want you to have to do it, too, ’cause they’re sacrificing for “the common good,” so everybody has to sacrifice for the common good.

CLAY: I think that’s so significant because this crystallizes that it’s not about them wearing a mask; it’s about they have to make you wear a mask.

Recent Stories

Build Your Own Airline, Mask Fanatics

19 Apr 2022

CLAY: All it took was one brave judge to totally destroy mask mandates across airplanes, trains, car-share service, everywhere where masking had been strongest for the past couple of years. In one 59-page ruling that came down yesterday while we were on the air, Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle decides that there is no basis whatsoever for the CDC’s arbitrary and capricious mask rule to still exist on airplanes, in public transit of any sort. She strikes it down, and almost immediately it felt like the Berlin Wall was coming down.

Buck, I think this may be, really when you think about it, the most influential district court ruling — district court ruling — of the twenty-first century so far. Obviously, lots of Supreme Court rulings have massive impact, circuit court rulings, state Supreme Court rulings.

But when you think about the millions of people that were immediately impacted in a positive way as every airline through yesterday afternoon and into the evening announced that they were finally doing away with this mandate. I want you to listen to some of the joyous reactions across the nation. Let’s play cut 4.

BUCK: I’m not much of a singer, Clay, but I would have been singing on that plane too. I would have been very, very excited about this. It’s amazing to see, first of all, that it took this judge… Where were all the other constitutionalists, reasonable judges on this? You know, look, I’m very happy for Judge Mizelle down in Florida. I’m also happy that apparently the state of Florida single-handedly trying to prevent the collapse of this country into authoritarian lunacy.

You know, Florida has done more, at least you could say, than any other individual state in the fight for freedom during the pandemic madness, the lockdowns, the mask mandates, all the stuff that’s been going on. It was unsettling, though, to see some of these now infamous, maybe famous — depends on what side of the aisle you’re on — blue check MDs, folks.

These are verified-on-Twitter doctors who are always mask fanatics, always pushing for more restrictions, saying things like, “This is outrageous; I will never fly again,” or, “How could they do this to people who made risk-mitigation decisions for themselves that have now been upended by the change in policy without due notice!”

First of all, have they ever flown on an airplane? Because airlines do whatever they want. Your plans mean nothing to them. That’s one part of it. And the other is who could think this is still a good idea, Clay? I am flabbergasted by the idiocy.

CLAY: It is amazing. I want to read some of these ’cause I do think it’s so entertaining. Jeremy Faust, MD, MS, (ER physician). By the way, if you need to put all of your degrees in your Twitter bio, how big of a loser are you, all right? I mean, seriously: “Jeremy Faust, MD, MS, (ER physician).”

By the way, I so wanted to respond, and I did respond to Jeremy Faust, MD, MS, (ER physician). I mean, how do these people after two years — this guy is, based on his picture, in his thirties, maybe his early forties. Presumably, if his wife is pregnant, she’s young enough to still get pregnant — a “pregnant person,” as I’m sure Jeremy would refer to her as — and he’s got a 4-year-old.

Their entire family is under no risk. And the idea that if they had masks on airplanes they would somehow be mitigating the risk is not in any way represented by any of the data. And so, Buck, what I think these things represent — and there’s another great one that was out, this guy — what’s this guy’s name, Buck — Dr. Feigl-Ding or something like this?

BUCK: Eric Feigl-Ding, I think? Is that right?

CLAY: Dr. Eric. They have to put the “doctor” in their Twitter account, right? You can’t just be whatever your name is. You have to be at — as if Eric Feigl-Ding was gonna be taken as the Twitter handle, he has to be Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding. I will not be flying Alaska Air until they reinstate public safety measures against covid-19, #BoycottAlaskaAir.

And I just responded, “Rent a car, loser.” But these people, I think, Buck, are representing… This is the realization that is storming their brain that they don’t matter suddenly after two years of being MD blue check marks where they were constantly lecturing everybody about things that mostly made no sense. In one fell swoop, this judge — this brave woman, Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, who I think deserves a lot of credit, 59-page report — boom! All of a sudden it’s all over — it really did, Buck, feel to me like the Berlin Wall coming down.

BUCK: I just want to tell all the libs, “Build your own airline.”

CLAY: Yes!

BUCK: “What’s the problem? Build your own airline! What’s the big deal?” These people were horrible for two years, I mean, especially the Blue Check Brigade on Twitter. And just so everyone, you know, gets it, the blue check MD brigade treats out like “Mask up. It’s responsible.”

And then MSNBC producers and CNN producers and others see that, they put it up on their screen, and then they reach out and they book that individual — who’s an MD — to be a guest. So, it was this big cycle of covid Fauciite lunacy that was constantly going on.

So when we talk… Even if you’re not on Twitter ever, the people that would then be asked to write the op-ed in the New York Times — this also goes to why Twitter is so important in the media news cycle. If you became an outspoken, mask-on-plane, blue check MD, like some of the ones Clay is talking about, you were writing op-eds in the New York Times. You were on CNN. you might even gotten invited to the Biden White House. You might have been talking to Jen Psaki or Joe Biden himself about these policies.

So it’s a feeder for all of that, and these individuals have done more to damage the public’s faith in public health as a profession than anybody could have ever imagined before. ‘Cause remember the original breach of the public trust — and Clay knows exactly what I’m gonna say — was these are the same people…

The people who are right now saying: “You still have to mask up on planes ’cause I’m a doctor and I’m so smart,” were the ones saying — when everyone else was locked down — “These BLM protests are really important, guys! This is about saving lives, so we can make an exception for this.” They are ideologically overzealous libs. That’s what you’re actually dealing with.

CLAY: There’s no doubt, and what is going to continue to be a battle — and, by the way, I want to say this. They will try to bring this back.

BUCK: I was gonna say, “You don’t think we’re done, do you?”

CLAY: No.

BUCK: I don’t think we’re done either. They’re gonna bring it back when they can.

CLAY: They will try to bring it back this coming winter or if there is another variant. And that is why we have to send such an incontrovertible message come November. Everybody has to vote out all of these tells me who try tried to take away your freedoms. There have to be consequences. There needs to be a reckoning. I wanted to open up lines, too, and let people who were on airplanes and actually experience because how cool is that, Buck?

What I thought was so great about that video that went viral of the pilots being able to come out and the flight attendants being able to come out was you saw how small the number of people that were actually committed to wanting to wear masks really was when those airplanes erupt in cheers and people are ripping the masks off their faces. It’s a tiny subset that dictated this to you.

BUCK: Oh, the covid commies were always a tiny minority of the overall population when it came to masking on planes, certainly by year two of this. I do not believe that any… Anybody who was willing to sit in a restaurant without a mask on should have been, by logic, willing to sit in an airplane, which is if you’ll safer. It’s not even equivalent. It is safer than a crowded restaurant or bar. So it made no sense all along.

But we were being held hostage to the neuroses of leftists who think that fashion and science are the same thing. Whatever is the one point in time what the cool kids are saying is actually what “the science” says, which is not in any way the same thing. So the end of this, I think, is fantastic. And it’s also a reminder, I think, of why this was so important, Clay, to the people that were the most restrictionist of the lockdowners, the Faucis. By the way, where’s Fauci? I want to see him.

CLAY: True. Totally vanished.

BUCK: He should be appearing on TV any moment saying (impression), “It’s too early. It has only been two years of masking on planes. We can’t take our foot off the throttle or whatever you use a foot for in a plane.” Yeah. I mean, there’s no way that Fauci’s gonna appear right now because everyone say, “Wow, he really is absolutely horrible.” But I don’t think it’s gone for good.

Now is when the voting actually really needs to get ramped up, folks — rather, the idea of voting needs to be so clear for everybody. ‘Cause, Clay, the federal mask mandate on planes was the libs sticking their thumb in the eyes of everybody who lives in a red state, of everybody who didn’t have to deal with the covid madness, and so this is really gonna heat things up. ‘Cause they liked that. This was a toy that the left had that they really don’t want to give up, and so you’re gonna see both sides getting really aggravated over this.

CLAY: How about the cowardice of the Biden administration too? I don’t think we can underrate this. As we were talking and this news came out yesterday and they did… Remember, Buck, when we broke the news and I said, “Well, that’s interesting, the Department of Justice didn’t immediately say, ‘We intend to appeal’?”

They said, “We’ll have to review the ruling,” and basically what Biden did and has done so far is he allowed this Trump-appointed judge — and God bless her again, Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle who deserves a lot of credit for writing what may be the most consequential federal district court opinion of the twenty-first century so far.

When you consider all of the impact that it immediately undertook based on when her ruling came out, the millions people who were immediately impacted, Buck, when you really break this down, Biden just allowed this 35-year-old judge, Trump appointee to change the entire CDC rules, basically, by pointing out that they were illegitimate.

And that way he didn’t have to get attacked by his own base, which are those blue check mark, “I want to wear masks forever” people. So now Biden can say, “Oh, this wasn’t my choice. This was the choice of this Trump judge.” But by not fighting it, he’s acquiescing to the fact that her legal reasoning is correct, but simultaneously being able to blame her so that his base doesn’t attack him for making this choice.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

BUCK: Welcome back to Clay and Buck.

BUCK: There was a little exchange just yesterday between Jen Psaki, chief White House propaganda czar, and Peter Doocy, who is asking actual questions — you know, challenging power, trying to get answers from a White House and an administration that doesn’t necessarily want to give ’cause it doesn’t help it politically. I thought that’s what journalists were all supposed to do but apparently it makes you a bad person if you actually do the job, according to Jen Psaki.

She said some mean things about Mr. Doocy week. But here we are, Clay, with the obvious moment of recognition here for this White House, there is no answer to the question that makes sense. And the whole (impression), “Yeah, it’s been doctors and, like, we have a color chart, and there’s, like, chartreuse and turquoise, like, right now in, like, Phase Two of the like… It’s sort of like an off yellow color but, like, it’s not quite red.”

What is that blather? The answer to the question is it makes no sense whatsoever. You’re safer on a plane than you are in a restaurant based on air quality but you have a lot more power on a plane and libs are obsessed, obsessed with exercising authoritarian covid powers, like the Siberian prison guards they all wish they could be.

CLAY: The White House kind of hung her out to dry there, honestly, with that answer, because within minutes of that answer, Buck, they were telling TSA agents, “No longer enforce the protocols regarding masks at airports,” and then you saw I think Alaska airlines was first, United Airlines. Slowly every airline… At first slowly and then rapidly every airline made the choice that they were no longer going to enforce this.

And that’s why I compared it a little bit to the Berlin Wall coming down ’cause suddenly people are like, “Wait a minute, I don’t have to wear this mask to go walk around in an airport anymore? The TSA agents are not going to be required to tell me to lift my mask?” And, by the way, I guarantee you there are tons…

And that’s why we want to open up the phone lines, 800-282-2882. What was the reaction wherever you were, if you were on a plane, if you were in an airport, what was the reaction as this news came down? Let’s have a little fun celebrating the defeat of the covid insanity.

BUCK: Yeah. We gotta have days where we all celebrate, folks. This is one of them, right? I mean, we take the fight to the left, to the libs, to the madness day in and day out. But you gotta also take a moment to admire some of your handiwork and we kept pushing for this one for a long time. So freedom is a beautiful thing, Clay.

CLAY: Amen.

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

19 Apr 2022

Recent Stories

Buck Dissects the Left’s Unequal Justice with Tucker Carlson

19 Apr 2022

Buck joined Tucker Carlson to discuss the plight of those who entered the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 — many waved in by police — and still languish in prison awaiting the opportunity to plead their case. Meanwhile, the suspect in the South Carolina mall shooting is right back on the street.

Recent Stories

Gov. Tate Reeves (R-MS) Talks Tax Cuts and Freedom

18 Apr 2022

BUCK: The governor of Mississippi, Tate Reeves, is with us. Mr. Governor, thanks for calling in.

GOV. REEVES: Thank you for having me. As always, it’s great to be on the show. How are y’all today?

BUCK: We’re good, sir. Thank you. Let’s talk taxes for a minute, if we can. I know you’re doing some things in your home state of Mississippi to try to ease the tax burden. But why is it that there are some red states out there that still have state income taxes, what can you do to get rid of it, and why is our tax code at a federal level (chuckles) thousands of pages long?

GOV. REEVES: Well, you know, that’s a couple of questions in there that could take a couple hours to answer. Let’s start with the federal tax code. It’s a couple thousand pages long because the federal government continues to spend irresponsibly, and somebody’s gotta pay for it. You know, we believe down here in Mississippi that government doesn’t have anything that it doesn’t first take from somebody else.

And, at the federal level, they literally take trillions of dollars from the taxpayers and constantly spend and spend and spend. And today is just an example that more and more people hopefully are paying attention to how much they are paying in taxes.

Technology is a good thing, but the technology that allowed American workers to take out on a weekly or a bimonthly basis or a monthly basis of their check, what they pay and owe the federal government makes a lot of individual Americans forget how much they’re paying to the federal government, and I think that creates some of the challenges.

CLAY: Appreciate you coming on, Governor. I’m curious how much attention with covid mobility — meaning so many people were able to work remotely and move to different parts of the country. It feels like among the business-centric state, which obviously a lot of them have Republican governors, there’s been an attempt to make an appeal to that group by declining the amount of state income tax.

And obviously I live in Tennessee. People know Florida, Tennessee, and Texas don’t have a state income tax in the South at all. How much of that is competition that you’re seeing to try to help Mississippi give a little bit more of reason for somebody to move to your state potentially — and also, obviously, help the people who are already there?

GOV. REEVES: Well, as usual, you have absolutely hit the proverbial nail on the head. I tell my legislators and the people across my state, “You don’t have to be a genius to look at a map and recognize that to Mississippi’s west is Texas, to our north is Tennessee, and to our east is Florida,” and if we want to be competitive, if we want to be competitive in our attempts to see additional capital investment…

If we want to be competitive in our attempt to create jobs, if we want to be competitive in our attempt to lure more residents into our state, we have to recognize that Texas, Tennessee, and Florida all have zero income tax. And that’s the reason earlier this year I proposed the complete elimination of the income tax in Mississippi so that we would be on a level playing ground.

We didn’t get a hundred percent of what we asked for, but we did get a major move in the right direction wherein today based upon the law that I signed into law last week we now have the fifth lowest marginal tax rate in America amongst those 41 states that have an income tax. As you know, there are nine income states including Texas, Florida, and Tennessee that do not have an income tax.

But amongst those 54 states that do have an income tax, Mississippi has — number one — the highest exemptions. So the first $36,300 of income is not taxed or is taxed at 0% in Mississippi. And then we also had the fifth lowest marginal rate so even our highest earners pay a flat 4% income tax, which, again, is lower than some 36 other states in America. And so we do it because I think it’s good public policy.

But as you so correctly said in the question, we also do it ’cause we have to because that’s exactly who we compete with. And look, the results are obvious. When you look at Florida, you look at Tennessee, and you look at Texas — three of the fastest growing GDP states in all of America — and you look at the other states across America and what you see is that in terms of economic growth, in terms of GDP growth, and in terms of population growth, those individual states that do not have an income tax are doing better, almost without exception, than those states that do have an income tax.

BUCK: We’re speaking with Governor Tate Reeves of Mississippi. Governor, the numbers are in for the last month on immigration when it comes to our southern border. There were, according to a federal court filing, 221,303 migrants encountered — which means processed and arrested for illegal entry at the southern border — in March. That’s the highest for any month since Biden took office.

Eighty thousand of them were released into the U.S. The other 109,000, give or take, were expelled via Title 42 authority. That Title 42 authority goes away in about a month’s time, and there’s already a number of major migrant caravans making their way to the U.S.-Mexico border. How do you see this playing out, and what is the Biden administration doing in preparation for a surge that we can all see coming in?

GOV. REEVES: Well, I can only assume that the Biden administration is doing the same thing in preparation today after announcing their decision on Title 42 that they’ve been doing for the last year, and that is basically absolutely nothing. It is streamed concerning to me and to other southern state governors particularly that we’ve seen this huge uptick in illegal immigration in this country.

It frustrates me to no end, to be honest with you, that within the last two weeks, Vice President Kamala Harris has found time in her schedule to visit Greenville, Mississippi, to highlight whatever it is that she wanted to highlight, but she hasn’t had time in the last year during her tenure as being in charge of the border crisis to actually visit the southern border.

It is extremely frustrating to me, it is bad for the country, but it just shows on issue after issue after issue Biden administration — and particularly those at the top — really have no understandings of what’s happening on the ground because they refuse to individual places like the southern border.

CLAY: We’re talking to Mississippi governor Tate Reeves. Governor, obviously today is tax day, and you’ve done a good job of helping to rescind some of the taxes that are obligated to be paid by your citizens. As you look toward — and I know you’re a state elected official, but as you look toward 2022 and what feels like — and I bet you feel it in Mississippi — what’s going to be a red wave, are you concerned at all that Democrats may try to pass through a tax increase to the national level while they still have a majority in the Senate and in the House regardless of what this economic impact might be, because come November, they’re not gonna have the power to do it anymore?

GOV. REEVES: Well, I certainly hope that there are enough members of the U.S. Senate that are reasonable that that would not happen, but we yes, I’m very concerned about it. If you look at one of the biggest problems domestically today in, it’s America is inflation. It is the fact that when Mississippi residents and others across the country…

When they go to their gas stations to fill up, their gas costs 30, 40, 50% more today than it did just a year ago. One of the big problems in America today is the rising cost of bread and milk and other goods that individuals are buying at the grocery store. And there is no doubt that all of this rising inflation is a direct result of the bad economic policies put in place by the Biden administration.

So I would not at all put it past the Biden administration to propose yet another bad economic policy like raising taxes on the hardworking people of this country who are struggling right now to pay the bills because of the fact that inflation is eating up the dollar every single day.

BUCK: Governor Reeves, have you seen the latest out of federal court in Florida where they have struck down, a judge has struck down the federal mask mandate? Just wondering what your thoughts are on this and how do you see this playing out in your state and so many other states now? It would seem like now people shouldn’t have to mask up on planes, trains, or elsewhere.

GOV. REEVES: Well, I will tell you, I literally was just told about that as I was walking into this particular interview, and good for the federal judge in Florida. My understanding is the basic argument in his striking down is this is yet another federal overreach by the Biden administration that is not justified by the science.

And that is something that has become more and more evident. In fact, I’m scheduled to fly sometime in the next two or three days, and I think what you just said is exactly right. I don’t think anybody — after this ruling by this federal judge in Florida — should be required to wear a mask on an airplane.

CLAY: Governor, I appreciate you joining us here on this day. When you look towards 2022, what do you expect to see? What are you seeing on the ground in Mississippi? What do you expect to see come November?

GOV. REEVES: Well, obviously I’m extremely optimistic for the 2022 election, particularly those elections in the U.S. House of Representatives as well as the U.S. Senate, as well as governors races from around the country, because the American people are a lot smarter than the Democrat politicians in Washington think they are.

The American people and the American voters recognize that the reason prices are going up is because of the excess spending by the Biden administration. They recognize that when you look at red states and you see GDP growth and you see the lowest unemployment rate in our country’s history…

For instance, in Mississippi, today we literally have the lowest unemployment rate we’ve ever had in our state. But when you look at blue states they continue to have unemployment rates that are nowhere near their all-time lows, and that is, in large part, because of the policies that were enacted during the pandemic. You see, states who believe in freedom tried to ensure that we focus not only on protecting lives but also protecting livelihoods.

Making sure that our people could get up and go to work and provide for themselves and provide for their families. We never wanted individuals in Mississippi to have to make a choice between doing what was best and providing for their families and their ability to put food on the table, and what the CDC or some federal agency told them that they had to or could not do.

And so I think the American people have seen what’s happened. They have seen what leadership looks like and the different decisions that have been made in red states versus blue states, or at least in those states that are run by Republican governors versus those that are run by Democrat governors. They’ve seen the excess spending in Washington that has led to significant additional burdens on every single working family across America.

And I think they also recognize that literally were it not for one or two Senators joining the 50 Republicans in the United States Senate — were it not for them, literally just a razor-thin margin of senators — the Biden administration would have been successful at getting three or $3.5 trillion more of their Christmas wish list in spending. They would have simply caused our prices for gas and food and milk and bread, et cetera, to go up even further.

So I’m optimistic about the 2022 election, but I’ll also tell both of y’all, and I mean this. It is just April of 2022. Our candidates across the country running for House, for Senate, for governor, and every legislative seat and every local race, we still got a lot of work to do, and I’ve always believed that the harder you work, the luckier you get, and we’ve just gotta keep working hard and keep explaining to the American people why our policies are good for the American people and Joe Biden’s policies are bad. And I think if we continue to focus that message over the next six months, I think we’ll be very successful in November.

BUCK: Governor Reeves of Mississippi. Sir, great to have you on. Thanks for joining.

GOV. REEVES: It’s always great to be on. Y’all have a great day.

Recent Stories

Future Retrospectives: Caving to Covid Craziness

18 Apr 2022

BUCK: Rob O’Neill, who is a friend, great guy, Navy SEAL, guy who shot bin Laden best known as. Remember when they…? This is from Business Insider back in August of 2020. “The Navy SEAL Who Killed Osama bin Laden Has Just Been Banned from Delta for Refusing to Wear a Mask,” and tweeting about it. So that also was a thing that could happen. So if you speak out publicly against the mask policy on these planes, they might decide to punish you even further for your insolence.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: But this has been so stupid — and honestly, there should be such a sense of growing shame for the Siberian prison guards of the sky who are enforcing this stuff. I’m not talking about the people who are cool about it and like, “Hey, they’re gonna yell at you unless… You know, can you just do me a favor?” Like, of course, right? Like, I don’t want anyone getting fired for this, either. But that’s not what I had! I had people that were like, “You mask up and you mask until I tell you you can’t mask up!” I had some psychopaths in the sky.

CLAY: When they do all the retrospectives on the covid era, there are a lot of people who are gonna have kids and grandkids that are either so young that they won’t remember it or they haven’t even been born yet. They’re going to see this, and they’re gonna say, “Wait a minute, mom and dad. Wait a minute, grandma and grandpa. You’re telling me that they told you that you had to wear a mask on the airplane, but you took it off when you ate or drank, and they claimed that that made you safe on the airplane?”

Recent Stories

The Cruel Human Cost of Mask Theater

18 Apr 2022

CLAY: We’re just now starting to realize, Buck — in addition to the fact that it created 8.5% inflation, that we ended up with the ridiculous choice between essential and nonessential businesses (as if that should have ever existed), that kids were forced out of school for long periods of time and will be reaping the whirlwind of their lost earnings from education for decades to come. Not to mention all the kids who just won’t ever return to school.

The money is wasted, and we still have idiot advisers in the White House saying that mandates work and we might need to assess whether still mandates on airplanes — vaccines mandates – could makes sense. This isn’t from year and a half ago. This isn’t even from last year. This is from Sunday on Meet the Press, White House covid adviser Dr. Ashish Jha, who seems designated right now to give Dr. Fauci a run for dumbest bureaucrat in the history of the country.

Listen to him discuss whether covid vaccine mandates to fly on airplanes might be necessary.

CLAY: That’s 15 days more of masks, which makes no sense. Also, cut 9 on whether mandates work and the fact that we may well need — according to Dr. Achich Jha — to make a decision to assess whether still, still covid shots to get on airplanes makes sense.

CLAY: Let’s talk specifically about whether we needed vaccine mandates for airplanes on Meet the Press.

BUCK: Yeah. “Mandates work,” as he’s laying it out here, is like saying armed robbery works.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: It is true that if you hold a gun to someone’s hide and say, “Your wallet or your life” most people will give you the wallet. That is true. But if you’re going to make a much broader claim that armed robbery is a great way to redistribute wealth for a more equitable society, you’ll probably have more all of debate on your hand. But, yes, the mechanism of force to get people to comply is something that often works.

Now, do mandates work when it comes to stopping the spread of the virus? Which they told us it would. This was about stopping covid from spreading this past winter. It was an abject failure. They made people get the shot by the hundreds of millions. They fired people from jobs by the tens or perhaps hundreds of thousands across the country. It did not stop the spread.

In fact, you can argue that it didn’t really… I mean, at what level did it stop the spread, if at all? And then it just turns into, “Well, those at high risk are less likely to be hospitalized or die,” to which everybody should just say, “Okay, then people at high risk should get the shot but it should be their choice to get the shot ’cause it’s not about risk to other people. That’s the whole point.” So they were wrong about everything, once again.

CLAY: And the fact that they can still say mandates work, as if there is no… I mean, the bank robbery or the robbery on the street analogy is a good one. It doesn’t mean it’s a good decision to implement them, right? Yes, if you tell someone, “If you don’t get this shot, you are going to lose your job,” most people are going to get the shot.

If you tell people, “Hey, if you don’t let me punch you in the face, you’re going to lose your job,” most people would let someone punch them in the face because they have to have their job to pay their mortgage, to pay for food and gas if to help their kids be able to get in school. These are not arguments in favor of mandates making scientific sense. It’s just that, yes, authoritarianism works in terms of requires people to do what the authority figure says. It doesn’t mean it’s the right decision for a healthy Democrat or a healthy country.

BUCK: The Democrat mind is generally obsessed with intentions over results. That’s been true all during covid. So this is why even when you can point to the obvious failures of different policies and decisions around covid that Fauci and Biden and Walensky and you name it — all the blue check MDs — were pushing, when you finally…

I’ve experienced it a few times, Clay, when you finally push someone in a corner and say, “Really? You think that masking up between bites on planes not only protects people on that plane, does anything in the grand scheme of covid? You really believe that?” They’re always fall back to, “Well, we need to do something.” This is what their mentality is.

Even if it’s pointless or even if it’s counterproductive, the doing something is in and of itself a moral good, a moral necessity that the state should force on people. So the result doesn’t actually matter. This has been their attitude about all of covid because otherwise they would turn around and say, “Hold on a second. What has worked and what hasn’t worked?”

Notice how they’ve never admitted… All they say is, well, the data has changed. They’ve never admitted the failure of a decision the entire two years plus they’ve been ramming this stuff down our throats. They never say, “We went too far, we were wrong.” It’s always “the data evolved.”

CLAY: Are you surprised — ’cause I am — that we haven’t seen other cities so far follow Philadelphia’s lead? I hope Philadelphia is gonna stay on an island out there. I know we got people listen in Philadelphia right now. Today is the return of their indoor mask mandate in the city of Philadelphia. There are different universities for an that have made the choice, “Hey, our kids have to be wearing masks again back in school.”

We talked about this last week. Washington, D.C., George Washington University — my alma mater for undergrad, American — I think Georgetown has as well. But the actual city mandates on masks have not yet come back in New York City — and you are afraid they might — in Washington, D.C., in L.A., in Seattle and San Francisco, places that have been super aggressive in terms of requiring their people to wear masks.

BUCK: I’ll tell you, I think it is purely out of anxiety of what this will do to the Democrat apparatus in the midterm elections. That’s it. It’s not a recognition of facts and reality. It’s not that people… It’s not even that Democrats are tired of this. I think there are a lot of Democrats who are like, “Mask me up!”

CLAY: Yeah. Forever.

BUCK: They need it. This is their psychological security blanket. Masking is their face anxiety napkin that they carry around with themselves all the time.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: Some breaking news, by the way — just in the last couple of minutes — emerging from the free state of Florida, and I am reading directly from this news report. I have not yet seen the actual opinion that is saying this. “A federal judge today vacated the national mask mandate for planes and other forms of public transportation, arguing that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had overstepped its authority.”

This ruling less than a week after the CDC extended the mandate for 15 days. I would imagine that the Biden administration will appeal this ruling from the Florida district judge almost immediately if they haven’t already. But this would be an opportunity if we could fast track this, Buck, to actually get this thing in front of the Supreme Court and see whether or not the Supreme Court would continue to accede to CDC authority.

Remember at least for part of the vaccine mandate, the Supreme Court memorably struck down the Joe Biden vaccine mandate as it pertained to OSHA, which was being enforced against the vast majority of employees. And now that vaccine mandate is starting to disappear. I saw even over the weekend that Broadway shows in your city of New York are finally stopping to check for whether or not people have gotten the covid vax. So you can go see now — I believe starting May 1st — a play on Broadway without having to prove that you got the covid shot.

BUCK: But they mask you still.

CLAY: Still have to wear masks.

Recent Stories