×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

C&B Celebrate National Puppy Day!

23 Mar 2022

BUCK: It is National Puppy Day. There are very few things that I feel like we could all agree on in America these days, but that puppies are adorable is maybe the statement of the most obviousness that you could come up with anywhere, the most obvious thing. And with this, Clay, I wanted to ask you. Now, I know you’re a cat… Are you ever going to get a dog?

CLAY: Let me just say this. I’m anti pets, and people are like, “Oh, my God!” I’m anti pets. While I have… There’s an additional statement here. I’ve got basically three pets. They are my young boys who destroy everything in the house, who require unbelievable amounts of time and energy. They are time vacuums. So when those boys are old enough that I am not running around chasing them…

Like I’m texting with my wife right now. We’ve got baseball practice. We’ve got so many debate practice, my kids do everything — soccer, baseball, basketball, flag football — they’re still young. All the sports, all day long, every day. So the idea that I want to add animals that I’m responsible for on top of the three animals that I’m also responsible for, aka my boys? No. But at some point in the future… We have the cats in the house now.

BUCK: How many?

CLAY: Two cats. Two Bengal cats. Ali has been sending them things to try not to tear up the whole house. They’re hypoallergenic cats. They live inside, and they have destroyed everything in the house. They’re brothers, cats. I would have a dog at one point in the future. I’ve had dogs in the past. Right now, no.

BUCK: What did you have growing up?

CLAY: We had a bunch. We had big dogs, like, we had a lab, which was great.

BUCK: What color?

CLAY: We had a black lab.

BUCK: Labs are great. I grew up with a Boston terrier, which are great city dogs. I always tell people, Boston… I loved that little dog. Boston terriers are like the Glock 19 of canines. They’re sort of easy, idiot proof and do everything you want. They get it done. The handgun owners in the audience know what I’m talking about.

It’s a utility player, like a Boston… You don’t need that much exercise but they can run and chase the ball. They’re like 15 to 20 pounds. They’re not a tiny dog but they’re not a big dog. So my family now has a French Bulldog in New York. It weighs 30 pounds.

CLAY: That’s the one that everybody’s stealing, right, French Bulldogs?

BUCK: She’s a plus-sized pooch. She’s a little bigger.

CLAY: These are, like, $1,000, $2,000 dogs, right? The French Bulldog is wildly popular.

BUCK: Yes, they’re very popular dogs. Some of them, Tallulah, the Sexton family Frenchy, is 12 years old. She’s a senior citizen of the canine world at this point. She weighs 30 pounds. There are blue French Bulldogs that will go… In New York, there’s also a lot of push back on that. There are pet stores in New York. I don’t know if they have them everywhere else, but you can buy a puppy, 5,000 for a Frenchy.

CLAY: Oh, my, $5,000.

BUCK: For a blue, which is the most desirable color, eight to 10,000 or more. This is why there have actually been people whose Frenchies have been stolen. Sorry, National Puppy Day is taking a dark turn here, but we love puppies. Clay, I was going to throw this out to you because I think this is interesting. The top, by owners, top three dog breeds in America. Let’s see, this is like Family Feud. What are the top three?

CLAY: I still think the Labrador is pretty popular.

BUCK: Number one across the country. What’s number two?

CLAY: Are Cocker Spaniels still really popular?

BUCK: They were in the ’80s. They’ve have fallen off.

CLAY: We had a Cocker Spaniel. Golden Retriever?

BUCK: That’s number four. So you’re close. You’re in the neighborhood.

CLAY: Bulldogs? They’re not big enough, right? There’s not enough of them. Is it in the top three?

BUCK: French Bulldogs are now, according to the American Kennel Club Association, the second most popular dog in America, little Frenchies.

CLAY: I would guess like there’s got to be a little dog that’s super popular.

BUCK: Frenchies are they’re smallish. Tallulah, she has too many treats. They’re usually 15 to 20 pounds.

CLAY: And in the third spot… So I’ve got three of the top four so far.

BUCK: Three of the four. Pretty good, I’ve got to say, for a guy who doesn’t even own a dog.

CLAY: Yeah. Right now. German Shepherd.

BUCK: Wow. Yep, you nailed it. That’s number three. Labrador Retrievers, French Bulldogs, German Shepherds. I love all of these dogs. For me, if I lived in the country, it’s a lab. If I live in the city, it’s a Frenchie. That’s the way I’d go. A Golden Retriever or Labrador I feel are pretty interchangeable, and it’s interesting, you see…

I feel like more than ever people realized during the pandemic — there are a couple of silver lining things out of the pandemic. The shelters emptied out. Although some people took the dogs back to shelters after the pandemic which was not good. But people realized, “Man, when things are rough, having a dog is a good way to go.”

CLAY: Well, and I think a lot of people with kids, because you’re stuck around the house. That’s certainly why we ended up getting the cats. My wife, who loves cats, has the three boys give a persuasive speech, because they weren’t in school. She assigned them a persuasive speech why we should get cats. And I succumbed to the pressure of my family outvoting me.

BUCK: What are the cats’ names?

CLAY: We’ve got Egon, who was named after the ghostbuster. We wanted to go Spengler but instead my youngest son, he liked Caillou. So we went Leo. Leo is the cat’s name on Caillou. We have Leo and Egon.

BUCK: Get a puppy, assuming you can take care of one.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

We Can’t Be Cowards in the Fight for Our Culture

23 Mar 2022

CLAY: Yesterday, by the way, Shannon Bream was fantastic breaking down the latest on Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings, which are ongoing. The drama not going to be very substantial, it does not appear, unless suddenly Joe Manchin came out and said, “Hey, you know what? I’m off the train here,” and that would be a heck of a reaction to watch what would happen there. But it does not appear that any Democrat is going to oppose this nomination. And as a result, a lot of this is theater, political theater, more than anything else.

Although I think KBJ has been weakened for not being able to say what is a woman. And this will also be a part of the midterm discussion. Because we probably should mention, Buck, in the midterms, if Republicans take back control of the Senate and of the House, this idea of court packing goes out the window. And I think, frankly — now we don’t know there would be a vacancy, because hopefully everybody stays healthy.

But if the Republicans have control of the Senate, I would presume that Mitch McConnell will follow through on the same thing that he did when Scalia died, by and large, and say the election will be a referendum on who gets to appoint the next Supreme Court judge.

BUCK: Arguably the most commendable, smoothest move Mitch McConnell pulled off was the waiting it out with Merrick Garland. Look, Mitch is an established guy. I don’t agree with him on everything. A lot of people in the audience have their fair share criticisms of the Senate minority leader. But fair is fair. We call balls and strikes here. He held the line on the prevention of the Merrick Garland nomination.

By the way, Merrick Garland would have been a doctrinaire lib, slightly less crazy than some of the Supreme Court options. But now we see him as attorney general. Remember Merrick Garland was the guy who had the FBI-looking-into-the-parents situation and the memo from the attorney general’s office. So don’t think that he’s not a wokester.

But also, Mitch… Mitch was very good under Trump in getting constitutionalists on the bench all across the country. So plenty of criticisms you can have, but Mitch had the machinery of judicial nomination working pretty well, and a lot of people have found that having those Trump judges on the federal circuit (chuckling) has made a big difference.

CLAY: Breyer wouldn’t have stepped down. We were talking about it earlier about the runoff elections in Georgia. If Republicans still had control of the Senate, I don’t believe that Breyer would have stepped down. I think that as a result there might not be a single appointment that Joe Biden would get during his tenure.

And, by the way, Merrick Garland to me, Buck, is an interesting example of a white guy who gets to a position of power and is so afraid of the subordinates that have helped him get there, that he ends up not even standing up for what he believes in anymore.

I think you’re seeing an element of that with Bob Chapek, who is the CEO of Disney, who initially said, “Hey, I don’t want to get involved in individual state legislative battles” that were surrounding what was labeled the “don’t say gay” bill in Florida. And his subordinates have basically crucified him over this. And that’s what Merrick Garland is afraid of. You get in a position of power, but if you’re a middle-aged to older white guy, you’re afraid that the people beneath you are going to replace you, and so you end up doing things that are totally outside of your own character. I think you can say the same thing about Joe Biden, by the way.

BUCK: Let’s think about this for a second. If you are, as you said, a middle-aged white guy in a position of power in the country right now — political power, corporate power, whatever it may be — there’s always a way to get at you for the woke activists, right?

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: It doesn’t mean you’ve done anything wrong, said anything wrong. “You don’t have enough of X group. You haven’t promoted enough of Y group.” This is essentially the old Al Sharpton model, which is we’re going to picket you and say you’re racist unless you pay us off, donate to the foundation, whatever it may be. This has now gone mainstream and broad spectrum all across the country.

CLAY: Shake down.

BUCK: And I think to your point, Clay, I think this is why you see, whether it’s CEOs or even politicians now or people that are cabinet members of the Biden administration. If you’re a middle-aged white guy, you’ve got to establish wokeness insurance in some way.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: You’ve got to be able to — because then if you come under attack, you can say, “But look at what I did. Look at what I’ve done for the community” or whatever the case may be, whichever community that’s coming after you and attacking you. I think that pushes a lot of them to get ahead of it right now because they realized they don’t have to find anything.

They’ll make something a problem for you, and that just goes to show how much power the organized institutional left really has in this country. I mean, the fact that Disney has walkouts going on in California. It’s California right? I always get Disney World and Disneyland confused. They have walkouts in California about the “don’t say gay” bill. Nowhere does it say you can’t say gay. I also think, I think the right needs to lean into this. I think the GOP needs to lean into this.

They hate it when we talk about CRT because they lose, because most of the country actually doesn’t think that an 8-year-old should be told, based on your skin color, you’re an oppressor or oppressed. Most of the country is not with them on that. I think most of the country is not with the activists on we need to be able to teach gender-identity norms to 5-year-olds. I don’t think the country is with them on that.

CLAY: The data says they aren’t. The Politico, I believe it was, had a pretty substantial poll, which showed that Republicans win on that issue by a large margin. I think what happens, Buck, there’s such a massive dichotomy between what the real world thinks and what Twitter thinks, that so many people out there follow what Twitter thinks. I’ll tell you this, Buck, my phone has blown up almost more than it ever has before from people out there who are saying:

“Thank God that you guys and OutKick are talking about this ridiculous Penn transgender swimmer story, because if you guys weren’t talking about it, it wouldn’t have even been discussed,” and there’s so many people who agree 100% with everything that we are saying that are terrified to say it themselves because they’re afraid they’re going to end up being targets.

BUCK: Who has cultural power these days?

CLAY: No doubt.

BUCK: Think this through. Who is directing and creating the narratives? Amazon. Netflix. Twitter. Facebook. Disney is a legacy company, but obviously still has a massive catalog and reach and owns a whole lot of different companies. They’re shaping the culture. This is why part of what we have to do on the right is not only to push back but also have our own machinery of love of country, individual rights and liberty, treating everybody as an equal, as an individual.

We have to have these institutions of cultural diffusion that we’ll have to build, quite honestly, because somehow the conservative movement in the last 20 years or so, I would say, came to this idea that we need to fight to have neutral spaces within these entities. Now what we’ve learned is there’s no neutral space.

There’s just what the left can get away with, the authoritarianism they can make us all endure, and what we have the power to push back on and so, “No. You can’t teach that, you can’t show that, you can’t cancel us. We’re gonna have…” It’s early stage. This stuff almost sounds crazy to people but we’ve got to do it.

CLAY: Look, if Fox News didn’t exist and the Wall Street Journal didn’t exist, imagine what our cultural discussion would look like in this country right now.

BUCK: Look, if Rush hadn’t been on the air for 30 years.

CLAY: That’s true.

BUCK: We sit here in the footsteps of a giant who created this. Without Rush, would there really have been a Fox?

CLAY: Fox News. I think Rupert Murdoch would have still had his influence. But really what we’re getting at is, there’s like three or four people that basically are standing up against an onslaught, an absolute avalanche of left-wing woke absurdity.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: And it’s disappointing to me, Buck, when I look at — we talked about this a little bit earlier, but maybe we need to mention this to close out — the governors in Utah and Indiana aren’t willing to stand up and say, “Hey, transgenders,” that is grown men, “shouldn’t be able to compete in women’s sports.” It seems like you compete in the biology on your birth certificate. Seems like the very essence of sports.

BUCK: For politicians who have no next level that they plan to go to, I think the calculation, meaning they’re not going to run for president; they’ve topped out at where they’re trying to go politically. They realize there are issues… You can be on either side of a tax issue. You can be on either side of a border issue, even. There are a lot of things you can take either side of. If you’re called a bigot, you’re not getting put on those boards, even when you’re done. You’re not getting those speaking engagements or book deals. The wokeness translates into dollar and cents for people.

CLAY: I think that’s true. But guess what? There ain’t two sides to “Should boys and girls compete against each other and should grown-ass men get to kick the crap out of girls in women’s sports?” There just aren’t. The fact that there are governors who won’t take that position, I think, frankly, they’re cowards.

Recent Stories

Economist Stephen Moore on How to Fix Inflation

23 Mar 2022

BUCK: We now have Stephen Moore with us, former economic advisor to President Trump, co-founder of the Committee to Unleash Prosperity and a senior economist at FreedomWorks. Stephen, I know we’ve only got you for a few minutes today, so I want to hand the floor to you by asking you what’s going wrong with this economy, and what should Biden and the people around him be doing to stop messing it up so much?

MOORE: So, great question. First of all, the worry right now is everyone knows we have inflation. Right? Everybody deals with it every day. I don’t have to dwell on it. The inflation is getting a little bit worse, not better. We’re at somewhere between 8, 9 or 10% inflation, depending what gauge you want to use. Those are terrible numbers. Those are the kind of numbers, Buck, that we saw back when, remember…

I don’t if you’re old enough to remember, but I’m old enough to remember, the ’70s when Jimmy Carter was president. And it just was a snowball that just kept rolling down the hill and got bigger and bigger until Ronald Reagan came to the rescue. So the problem that I see right now… Look, inflation is a big, big problem, but what happens if this inflation crashes the economy?

And there are more and more economists who I respect who are really worried about that. And I am, too. This story of raging inflation almost never has a happy ending. So then you get that dreaded S-word, Buck, which is of course “stagflation.” You know what stagflation is, right?

BUCK: Yes, sir.

MOORE: For those that don’t know, stagflation is the combination of stagnation — which is no growth — and high inflation, and we’re seeing some signs of that. So far in the first two and a half months of this year the economy is growing at about 1%. That’s barely just keeping your head above water.

CLAY: And, so — this is Clay, by the way, thanks for coming on with us — what is going to happen? It appears that there’s almost no ability to pass any kind of significant legislation for the rest of this year, and then obviously we go —

MOORE: That’s good news! (laughing)

CLAY: Yes, that’s good news.

MOORE: Yeah, right. Look, almost everything that Biden has passed is what’s created this inflation.

CLAY: Yes.

MOORE: See, and I think most Americans can connect these dots. When you have multi-trillions of dollars of spending bills and then you’re just borrowing to pay for it, and then you’re printing money to pay for it, isn’t it pretty self-evident that’s going to cause inflation?

CLAY: Well, thankfully Joe Manchin was one of the few Democrats that said, “This is not ideal,” and managed to not pass the multi-trillion dollar additional bill.

MOORE: Yes. Right. Could you imagine if they passed that $5 trillion spending bill?

CLAY: It’s crazy to think about.

MOORE: By the way, there was a news report this morning that came across the wire, and I don’t know how accurate it was, but that Joe Manchin was open to some compromise on this. We don’t need anymore spending! We should be cutting government spending right now. If I were… I did advise Donald Trump on the economy.

He didn’t need a lot of my help because he understood the economy; Joe Biden doesn’t. But if I were advising him, I would say, “Get cutting. Covid is over for now. Let’s cut back on all these extra expenditures. Pay our bills. Start balancing our budget like households do,” and then I think you’d see the inflation going down. The other thing we have to do by the way is start producing energy here at home.

CLAY: Yeah, there’s no doubt. That’s what I was going to say,is we’re not really going to get a lot done the rest of this year. Then we get Democrats losing the House and maybe the Senate as well, so nothing happens the next two years. What are we going to look like — gotta get a quick answer here — by 2024? What are we sitting at as an economic situation?

MOORE: Well, I can’t see that far ahead. I can tell you the next 12 months are looking pretty dicey.

BUCK: Recession, Stephen? Are we heading to a recession?

MOORE: I hope not. I think we can still avoid it, if we just get some sensible policies coming out of the White House. And the Fed, by the way, has to start to act more swiftly and with more authority to tackle this inflation problem.

BUCK: Stephen Moore, everybody. Stephen, thanks so much for being with us. We appreciate it.

MOORE: A recession is not in the cards. We can still avoid it. It’s not too late.

Recent Stories

NYT Panics Over Democrats Losing Hispanic Voters

23 Mar 2022

CLAY: Buck, we were just talking with Stephen Miller about all the chaos at the border. And the data continues to reflect, if you look at all this polling, that the border is the single biggest weakness for Joe Biden among a bevy of weaknesses. We’re not talking about Joe Biden having a lot of positive things that he’s able to sell right now. But what’s wild about the border is how awful it is even for Democrats who see what’s going on.

And the border issues are not in any way helpful with Hispanic people at all, which was the argument that it would be an issue. And in fact, there’s actually an article on the editorial page of today’s New York Times where they are talking about the dangers of how rapidly the Hispanic vote is fleeing from the Democratic Party.

And I just thought that some of the data on it was really pretty extraordinary when you break it down and think about how quickly we’ve gone from — Buck, you remember this — “The Hispanic vote is going to guarantee that the Democrat party wins every election for years and years into the future,” to the point now where there really isn’t that occurring. And in fact, there are people now projecting that in 2022 it’s possible the majority of the Hispanic vote is going to go for Republicans. It’s incredible how quickly that’s moved.

BUCK: Obviously it could. We’re predicting the future. That would be earthquake-in-politics-level stuff if you had the majority.

CLAY: The most recent Wall Street Journal poll — again, it’s a poll; I understand the craziness that can come from polls — it had Republicans in front with Hispanic voters, which has never happened before. And I believe the numbers that have come out so far for Hispanic voters… In Barack Obama’s final year, 71% of Hispanic voters voted for Barack Obama.

And then in 2016, Trump actually improved on those numbers. By 2020, Democrats only got — Joe Biden, only got — 56% of the Hispanic vote. So by that point it’s 56/44, even with all the negative attention coming to Trump. It would not stun me if the Hispanic vote breaks for Republicans in 2022.

BUCK: It is fascinating. One thing you don’t hear about in the media is how many legal immigrants — Hispanic Americans, how many of them — don’t actually like an open border, the ones who came here legally. Now there a lot of people who have family members who are illegal, and that can often affect voting patterns.

If your dad is an illegal but you were born here, you might view that differently. There are other areas, though, as well where you can already start to see how this is happening, the data that you’re speaking of, Clay, why it would go that way. The BLM movement and the riots in the summer of 2020, a lot of small business owners and employees of small businesses are Latino, Hispanic Americans.

And they really thought that that was… They saw that for what it was, the riots, where you had, yes, there were a lot of African-Americans partaking in both the protests, and then the riots involved actually a lot of white liberals from ANTIFA. But the Hispanics saw that and said, “Hold on a second. What the heck is this all about?” And also on the gender identity issues, Hispanic community is generally — and they’ve really kind of laughed off this Latinx thing they’ve been trying to do.

CLAY: I was going to hit you with that. That’s in the article.

BUCK: Is that in the article? I just know this stuff from knowing Latinos. (laughing) They’re like, “No, don’t call us Latinx. What’s this?” What’s it say in the piece?

CLAY: So the article is headlined: “While Democrats Debate Latinx, Latinos Head to the GOP.” This is on the editorial page of the New York Times today, and I was reading it this morning, and the Latinx part was one that I thought you would love. “Commonly used by…” I’m reading directly from the article: “Commonly used by media, political and academic elites as a sign of gender inclusivity, ‘Latinx’ is virtually nonexistent in the communities it refers to.

“In 2020, Pew Research revealed that only 3% of Latinos use the term, while 9% of white liberals think it is the most appropriate term to use. In fact, only 14% of Latinos with a high school degree or less had even heard of it.” The article basically goes to the Democratic Party has become so culturally left-wing that they are disconnected from the overall Hispanic vote. I misspoke a little bit.

I want to get the numbers right here: It was 71% Obama, 66% Hillary (that’s 2012-2016), 59% for Biden. So 59/41. But according to the Wall Street Journal poll that recently came out, Joe Biden is so wildly unpopular with Hispanic voters — and this was something that had been the case for a while. If you remember, Biden got crushed in Nevada. Remember? There were a lot of Hispanic voters in the primary. That’s when a lot of people said, “Biden’s campaign is over.” Then he came back to South Carolina, got endorsed by Clyburn.

BUCK: African-American Democrat voters delivered Joe Biden the nomination in that party.

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: Without them rallying to Biden’s flag, so to speak, he would not have come out of that primary, I think, with the nomination, and these indicators… You’ve got to add into all this, we’re talking about things that are specific to the Hispanic community, which I think is still the most broadly… People will say Latino or Latina, but the Hispanic community in America has some areas that are specific at least in the polling areas of concern.

Add on top of what we’ve already talked about, high price of gas, those people hate; the obvious weak economy and inflation that’s chipping away. There’s a lot of Hispanic small business owners and employees of small businesses, as I said. Those are the kind of people for whom the increase in the price of everything you need really is painful and gets old fast. Look, like I said, Clay, it has to be an absolute wipeout or else we on the right have not done our jobs in this midterm. It has to be a total annihilation of Democrats everywhere where it’s conceivable at the polls.

CLAY: There’s a lot of Hispanic listeners right now. They understand the importance of capitalism. They came here because of American excellence, and they don’t agree with the idea that is being sold by the left-wing of the Democratic Party that America is evil and an awful, racist place to live. Where are those people going to vote? I think they belong in the Republican Party, and I think in 2022 they’re going to send a seismic message to this country about how inclusive and wide and appealing the Republican message has really become.

Recent Stories

Stephen Miller Warns of Apocalyptic Border Crisis

23 Mar 2022

BUCK: We’re joined by former senior advisor to President Trump in the White House Stephen Miller. Stephen, really appreciate you being with us today.

MILLER: Great to be here. Thank you.

BUCK: A federal judge has enjoined Biden’s executive actions that, as you wrote here in Twitter, “functionally abolished ICE and shielded tens of thousands of criminal aliens from deportation.” America First Legal worked with Arizona, Ohio and other states on this. Tell us what’s going on — and it seems like at least an early stage win against Biden’s lawlessness at the border.

MILLER: Yeah, so, a couple of things. This is a lawsuit that originally was filed in Arizona, and my organization, America First Legal, worked with Arizona on the filing of that lawsuit. And then it was moved to the state of Ohio, into the Sixth Circuit, out of the Ninth Circuit, and the district court judge recently enjoined President Biden’s entire scheme of nullifying ICE by executive action.

Specifically what President Biden did through secretary of DHS, Mayorkas, was to prohibit ICE officers from arresting the vast majority of not only illegal aliens, but specifically criminal illegal aliens. To explain briefly how this works, so Border Patrol arrests illegal aliens crossing the border. ICE’s job…

There’s a lot of jobs, but the two that are relevant here are to deport illegal aliens that Border Patrol can’t remove — typically that means to a further away than Mexico — or to arrest illegal aliens in the interior of the country in all 50 states. The second mission is really relevant here because what ICE does, by and large — most of the day-to-day work before Biden — is a local police department in the place that you live arrests somebody for committing a crime.

They get a 911 call. They go somewhere. They arrest somebody. When that person’s in custody, they run them through a national database to determine whether or not there’s an active warrants, whether or not they’re wanted in other jurisdictions, or if they’re an illegal alien or a deportable alien. And if it gets a hit, if it comes back, “Hey, this person can be deported, they’re here illegally,” or they’re a student visa holder or whatever it may be, then ICE places something called a detainer.

ICE says, “Please hold on to this person and before you release them hand them over to us.” So, whether it may be at the end of the sentence, or because the witness doesn’t show up and they have to drop the charges, whether they’re bonded out by a judge, whatever it is — as soon as this person leaves your custody you hand them over to us and we’re going to send them home.

That is the bread-and-butter work that ICE does. Biden said you can’t do that anymore. You cannot remove these criminal aliens that have been arrested by police departments all across the country. When they’re released, they go back into the community to offend a second, third, fourth, fifth, tenth, 20th time.

That policy is practical, real world effect — and this is not exaggeration — tens of thousands of criminal aliens with charges ranging from drunk driving to sexual assault, to indecent exposure, to child predation, to domestic abuse, battery, home invasion, et cetera, are all being released to repeat their crime spree against Americans. Now, that was enjoined just this week in Ohio.

But we have a track record — so I temper people’s enthusiasm, but we have a track — of Biden defying court injunctions. We need to be honest with ourselves here. He lost the big case on Remain in Mexico, as you recall. They have removed only several hundred people under the Remain in Mexico program since losing that court case, while we’ve had two million illegal immigrants crossing the border.

If we had defied an injunction in that way in the Trump administration, we’d all be in jail for contempt. So we won the case. It’s still unclear what scheme Biden’s going to come up with to find a way to keep releasing illegal aliens into this country. So it’s a colossal victory, but I expect the Biden Administration to do everything they can to keep the flood of illegals coming into our communities.

CLAY: Stephen, thanks for coming on. This is Clay. It’s clear that the Biden administration is not supporting — and Buck, we’ve talked about this a lot on the show — the border officials who are in charge of trying to protect the border. But this is crazy. I read yesterday, Stephen, that we’re now six months in to that investigation of Border Patrol officials for their horseback pursuit of illegals, and they still haven’t been cleared.

How wild is that to you, Stephen, that we could be…? To your point on Biden doing everything he can to delegitimize our borders and lead to them basically becoming a sieve, how wild is it that that investigation would still be ongoing of those photos, remember, that everybody tried to claim were evidence of the whipping of people who were running across illegally? How wild is that investigation still going?

MILLER: Well, it’s egregious. It’s sinful. They are persecuting innocent agents who are doing their jobs in impossible circumstances because of the lawless decisions made by their superiors. The reality is that this administration’s immigration policy is run by hardcore activists who hate ICE, hate Border Patrol, hate borders, and hate our sovereignty and want it eradicated. When I was working at the Trump administration and border security, we were going to battle every day against these forces — against organizations, entities and outfits like the ACLU — that did not believe in borders, did not believe in American sovereignty.

Those people that we were fighting with, those people that were trying to get illegal aliens into the country any way they could are now the ones running the immigration policy for the entire United States of America. So we are, in a very real sense, the first major country that I’m aware of in world history whose own government is launching a systematic campaign to eradicate its own borders — including, as I mentioned, the mass release of illegal aliens with severe criminal records.

BUCK: Speaking to Stephen Miller, the senior advisor to former President Trump and America First Legal. Stephen, there was a story just a couple days ago that the Biden administration is worried about the optics if they get rid of Title 42 authority from the CDC that allows the expulsion of migrants during a pandemic, because there will be a mass migration event. Thousands of illegals would immediately try to pour into the country. Do you think that this is finally getting to the point where the Democrats — they’re not going to change policies, obviously, but they’re at least trying to hide the reality of this from the American people in the midterms?

MILLER: They are trying to hide the reality. If our southern border was covered with even one-tenth the attention given to, for example, Ukraine, the public would be so up in arms about what’s happening that the border would be closed the next day. In other words, we have violent transnational cartels responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of people throughout our hemisphere. If you include drugs, which you must include, hundreds of thousands of people across our hemisphere. And there’s total silence and blackout in media coverage. What they’re planning next on Title 42 will be — the only word I can think of is — “apocalyptic.”

The word “disaster,” “catastrophe,” “calamity” doesn’t even come close to describing what’s coming our way. We’ve already had the highest level of illegal immigration in recorded history with this tool under Biden — at least on paper — in place. So we’re going to go from the highest level since numbers were kept, not counting — not counting — the people that are got-aways, not counting the people we don’t even know about — to some greater, even higher more unimaginable figure. That’s apocalyptic. That’s country-ending. That continues for a few years, and the damage that is going to be done to our nation will be irrevocable.

BUCK: Stephen Miller, formerly advisor to President Trump, now the America First Legal. Stephen, appreciate the expertise. Thanks for being with us.

MILLER: Thank you.

Recent Stories

Big NFL Trade Will Make Senator Rubio Very Happy

23 Mar 2022

CLAY: Buck, I know you don’t care about this, but I bet a ton of listeners do, especially those in South Florida. So I want to mention this. Tyreek Hill is probably the most famous wide receiver in the entirety of the NFL. Plays for the Kansas City Chiefs. Patrick Mahomes’ the top target. He’s been traded to maybe the city you’re going to live in before long. Miami Dolphins. Marco Rubio, senator, is one of the biggest Dolphin fans I know.

And I know he is exalting right now. And so Tyreek Hill, the top wide receiver maybe in the entirety of the entire NFL, but certainly the top receiver of Patrick Mahomes and the Kansas City Chiefs as they’ve been on a roll, going to Miami. So you may see him out, when you’re out on South Beach, you may look over your shoulder. “Hey, there’s Tucker Carlson and Tyreek Hill in the same place!”

BUCK: Maybe I’ll have a couple of mojitos and be, like, let’s race.

CLAY: I think he’d win. One of the fastest players in the history of the NFL.

BUCK: I think he’d win. I’ve lost a step or two, Clay, I’m 40 now. I used to be speedy.

CLAY: He might get off the line a little bit faster than you. But more talent to Florida. We’ve been talking about how the state of Florida is just adding unbelievable amounts of talent on a day-to-day basis — and I think probably, Buck, this is one of the great underreported stories that is going to become a big story in 2022. There are now 250,000 more Republicans in Florida than there are Democrats — never happened before in the history of the state, by the time of the election — I think there will be.

BUCK: I’ve been talking to some people. We’ll have more discussions about this in the show. There needs to be more organized effort by the conservatives to go to key states that are doing things the right way like Florida, like Texas, like Tennessee, and create red bastions of freedom.

CLAY: God knows we need it. After covid, we need it badly.

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

23 Mar 2022

  • The Hill: Cruz presses Jackson on critical race theory in tense questioning
  • New York Post: Senators should ask Ketanji Brown Jackson whether she backs the Yale Law hecklers — or free speech
  • HotAir: Judge Jackson keeps her distance from Ibram Kendi during questioning by Sen. Cruz (Update: Kendi’s response)
  • NewsBusters: Clarence Didn’t Get the Ketanji Media Puffery
  • Washington Free Beacon: Ketanji Brown Jackson Has Leadership Role at School Promoting Critical Race Theory
  • National Review: Justice Scalia Won
  • BizPacReview: Tucker Carlson on Biden’s woke SCOTUS nominee: a ‘garden variety white liberal in what she believes’
  • BizPacReview: Stark difference in Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings centers around question on beer NOT asked

  • Federalist: Did The New York Times Admit Joe Biden Is Corrupt So Democrats Can Get Rid Of Him?
  • Breitbart: Schweizer: Joe and Hunter Biden ‘Had Intermingled Finances’
  • UK Daily Mail: ‘Excuse me it’s the Northern Triangle — not immigration’: Kamala hit back at Biden for making her ‘border czar’, wanted to look after Nordic countries instead and felt disrespected by President’s ‘white inner circle’, book claims
  • Daily Wire: Exodus: 10 Key Officials In Kamala Harris’ Office Have Quit In Just 14 Months
  • NewsBusters: New York Times Columnists Discuss Uncomfortable Topic of Hunter Biden Laptop
  • JustTheNews: GOP sets stage to probe spiking of Hunter Biden laptop story; warnings to preserve evidence sent

  • The US Sun: Inside Putin’s £500m superyacht with pool that becomes dance floor, huge home cinema and even a GOLD toilet roll holder
  • UK Daily Mail: Putin loses his 15TH top commander as Ukraine continues to take out elite troops: Colonel is latest to die as Russia suffers worst loss of military leaders since World War Two
  • UK Daily Mail: ‘The ashes of a dead land’: Drone footage gives a glimpse of the devastation wrought on the besieged city of Mariupol as survivors describe fleeing past piles of corpses rotting in the streets
  • New York Post: Russia ‘looted’ Chernobyl lab with ‘highly active’ radioactive samples
  • Daily Beast: ‘It’s a Sh*tshow’: Russian Troops Are Now Turning on Each Other
  • PJ Media: Joe Biden and World War III for Dummies
  • FOXNews: Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov issues chilling warning about ‘direct clash’ with NATO

  • CBSNews: Hillary Clinton says she has tested positive for COVID-19
  • Daily Wire: Alcohol-Related Deaths Soared During Pandemic, Outpaced COVID-19 For Adults Under 65, Study Says
  • Daily Wire: CDC Lowers COVID-19 Death Count By More Than 72,000
  • Daily Caller: One Of World’s Most Populous Nations Suddenly Erupts With COVID After Two Years Of Almost No Cases

  • Daily Wire: Food Prices Are About To Get Even More Exorbitant
  • UK Daily Mail: Thirty second smash-and-grab heist nets Beverly Hills sledgehammer gang $5MILLION in jewelry as terrified locals watch in disbelief
  • HotAir: NYC Mayor doubles down, expands anti-crime unit

  • Federalist: 8 Lessons From The Ron DeSantis School Of Dominating The Corrupt Media
  • Washington Free Beacon: DeSantis Recognizes Female NCAA Athlete, Not Lia Thomas, as Top Women’s Swimmer
  • Daily Wire: ‘I Left There With No Trophy’: NCAA Female Swimmer Who Tied For Fifth With Trans Athlete Says Officials Put Lia Thomas Ahead Of Her
  • Federalist: Everybody Knows Rachel Levine Is Truly A Man, Including Rachel Levine
  • JustTheNews: Tech platforms censor satirists, feminists for questioning gender ideology
  • PJ Media: Disney’s LGBQTWXYZ Frenzy Sows Division in the Company Family
  • Deadline: Disney Staffers Take To Streets & Social Media In Walkout Over Company’s Reaction To ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill; Hulu, Disney+, FX, ESPN + More Offer Social Media Support
  • PJ Media: Watch What Happens When a Mother at a School Board Meeting Tries to Read Explicit Content Served Up to Students
  • Campus Reform: This is how ‘detransitioners’ who regret their gender assignment surgeries get sidelined by leftist narratives

  • Recent Stories

    Clay On Kamala, The Veep No One Wanted

    23 Mar 2022

    Clay discussed our “Our Awkward, Uncomfortable, Unbelievable Veep” Kamala Harris on Fox & Friends.

    Recent Stories

    Shannon Bream on Ketanji Brown Jackson

    22 Mar 2022

    CLAY: Ketanji Brown Jackson. You are right there now watching this hearing. Compare and contrast it with the Brett Kavanaugh hearing, please.

    SHANNON BREAM: Oh, my goodness.

    CLAY: (chuckling)

    BREAM: It was a totally different world for many reasons. First of all, the general public is not allowed in the Capitol right now for these hearings. That makes it enormous — because when we were allowed in some of them would come with things hidden under their shirts or hats. They would jump up with posters and yell.

    You guys, if you remember, from the very opening statement by then-chairman Grassley, he was interrupted numerous times and we thought, “Oh my goodness. This is not going to be a normal confirmation hearing,” and it was very jarring at the beginning because it happened so consistently and the Capitol Police, bless their hearts, fantastic men and women, they were taking protester after protester.

    It was a constant strain, to the point that by the third day they were yelling and jumping up, and nobody even flinched. It had gotten so ridiculous, people were just talking. (laughing) This is a totally different situation. It’s much more calm and respectful, and I think a lot of that is because the public’s not allowed in.

    CLAY: Is there any drama at all about whether or not she’s going to be confirmed, in your mind?

    BREAM: I don’t think so, simply because the Democrats have the votes if they all stick together, and I imagine they will and probably get a couple of Republicans too. So we’re looking at this through the lens of the GOP trying to score points for the midterm. I think a lot of it is about that, the argument that Judge Jackson is soft on crime or that she’s going to be really progressive. I think it’s more about kind of trying to paint the Democrats with a certain philosophy and a far-left philosophy more than it is about the actual word on her.

    BUCK: Shannon, it’s Buck. I’ve got to say, I think that one of the big differences between what their goal was with Kavanaugh versus what any kind of goal would be here, was that the Democrats believed if they could scuttle the Kavanaugh nomination, they would get a “more moderate,” which would mean more Democrat-leaning in decisions, justice to replace him.

    Effectively the GOP would have been scared. Trump would’ve said, “Fine, we’ll give you Merrick Garland or someone like that.” At least that was their plan. Is it fair to say, if it wasn’t Ketanji Brown Jackson — and I’ve said I think she’ll get four or five GOP votes, in addition to all the Democrat votes.

    BREAM: Mmm-hmm.

    BUCK: If it wasn’t her, it would be someone with a similar judicial philosophy. There’s no chance that the Senate Democrats and Judiciary Committee — I’m sorry, there’s no chance that Biden, rather — would put someone forward who wouldn’t be along the lines of a leftist and an activist on the court. Am I misreading this?

    BREAM: Listen, he’s definitely going to choose, as the president, somebody that he feels would rule in the way and share the philosophy that he has about the law and interpreting the law and interpreting the Constitution and statutes and taxes and all that kind of thing. But I’ve got to tell you, there’s some reaction from the far left who are not thrilled from her answers today because she’s saying things like: “Here’s what I do.

    “I try to be neutral; I go read the text and I go back to the original people who wrote the text.” What did they mean at the time they wrote it. That doesn’t sound like a super far-left progressive situation where the Constitution is living and breathing, I’m going to interpret it. She specifically said, “I would not interpret statutes of the Constitution based on my own personal policy preferences or the policy preferences of the day.”

    So she’s saying all the things that you would need to say to get Republican votes. But there’s some on the left feeling like, “Wait a minute, we wish President Biden had gone further left. She sounds a little too mainstream and reasonable compared to what we thought we were going to get.”

    CLAY: Shannon, she said or she was asked during questioning about saying that George Bush, W. Bush, I believe, was a war criminal, and said, “Oh, I didn’t intend to offend him.” Did that register any significant impact, in your mind?

    BREAM: Yeah, I was actually out of the room when that happened. But as the hearing just restarted with Senator Dick Durbin, the Democrat who runs — the chairman of — the committee, he was bringing in some materials saying that he wanted the context of what she had said. So I think you’re probably going to hear more about that this afternoon. And she’s going to want to… After that quick break, she’s going to want to readdress that, I think, and give people a more definitive answer on that.

    CLAY: Outstanding stuff as always, Shannon. We appreciate you making the time. We know you have to watch all that hearing, and looking forward to watch you on Fox News as well.

    BREAM: Can I ask a question? I want to know how Buck’s bracket is doing.

    BUCK: Uh-oh!

    CLAY: Oh, that’s a fantastic question.

    BUCK: Uh-oh!

    CLAY: Who did you pick, Shannon? Liberty wasn’t in it.

    BREAM: I know.

    CLAY: You guys had the fantastic uniform reveal.

    BREAM: Ohhh, the best uniform reveal ever.

    CLAY: Yes.

    BREAM: Sheldon will tell you, my husband, when I have to make a decision about sports a lot of times I go to the, quote, “costumes,” and then I decide based on what they’re wearing.

    BUCK: Shannon, I’ll tell you this. Mr. Fancy sports know-it-all man, Travis’ top topic, is already out, and my own Villanova… What’s the mascot, Clay?

    CLAY: Wildcats.

    BUCK: Thank you, my own Villanova Wildcats, that I love so much, are still in it, Shannon. So there you go.

    CLAY: He may end up beating me. He may end up beating me, Shannon. So it is a mess.

    BREAM: (laughing) Thanks guys.

    CLAY: That’s Shannon Bream, does great work as the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearing continues with the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

    Recent Stories

    Yale’s Woke Maniacs Foreshadow a Corrupted Legal System

    22 Mar 2022

    BUCK: We mentioned in passing in the last few days, I think, this Yale Law School free speech event that has started to get more and more attention as people realize the full extent of what occurred here, and it’s indicative of a much bigger trend, something that should concern and worry all of you across the country because of what it means for who wields power, not just in the apparatus as a general sense, but the legal apparatus of this country.

    So, this is a piece up on the Daily Mail: “‘Law schools are in crisis. The truth doesn’t matter much. The game is to signal one’s virtue’: Yale law school professor who tackled woke mob at free speech event says future of the rule of law in the U.S. is in crisis.” Let me say, she’s telling you the truth. The law schools have gone ultra-woke.

    They are churning out activists, and they don’t change their minds when they graduate from law school. They become prosecutors. They become partners at big powerful firms. They become the people that make the determinations within the legal apparatus. Clay, you went to law school. You understand the progression of this over time. It is remarkable to talk to attorneys today who will say, “It’s not that the left-wing law school and now post-law school…”

    You know, associates at firms, all the way up to now more senior lawyers and prosecutors. It’s not that they disagree just on political issues. They get outraged by the notion that everyone’s entitled to a defense, that you have “the right to remain silent” no matter how bad of a right-wing person you may be. Maybe you were part of the insurrection! This is madness.

    CLAY: Yeah, it is and those who haven’t seen the viral videos of the Yale Law School free speech event being shouted down by Yale law students, it’s terrifying, because it’s one thing when — I don’t want to say uneducated, but — youthful and dumb 18- and 19-year-old kids, college kids (which a lot of U.S. have been at some point in time) get fired up and decide they’re going to speak out against someone who is on campus.

    I don’t agree with that in any way. But by the time you get to law school, by the time you are 22 or older — and certainly as you are studying the law, which I was fortunate enough to be able to do at Vanderbilt Law School — it’s shocking to me to even think from the time when I was in law school, in the early 2000s (I graduated from law school in 2004) that at any point while I was on Vanderbilt’s campus, there could have ever been a speaker who was shouted down.

    No matter what that speaker was discussing, it is unfathomable to me that it could have ever occurred. And when I read and see what is going on in law school communities now — and also inside of big law firms, Buck — this is a big deal that I don’t think is discussed enough. There are companies that are so woke now, Buck, that they are saying not, “Give me the best lawyers to represent this company for purposes of legal representation.”

    But they’re saying, “Give me a set quota of minority lawyers to work on my legal issues,” something I’ve never heard of before. The idea that you wouldn’t pick the best lawyers inside of the best firm, but that you would say, “The people who work on this have to be cosmetically diverse,” it’s crazy. And the idea that we have allowed this belief — and I mean faculty, too . There are so many faculty, Buck…

    There was a big story recently about the N-word. Do you remember this story? Inside of… I think it was Yale Law School as well, that a professor had read the N-word in a court case, and it had turned into a massive issue that you would even utter it. It’s inside of a proceeding, right, the factual analysis of a case.

    BUCK: So their expectation is to change the court record of what was said Because it offends.

    CLAY: That’s right. Yeah. Don’t read the transcript.

    BUCK: And this is why I say this notion of banning a word for some people in all usage is all wrong.

    CLAY: Yeah.

    BUCK: We all abide by this unfortunately because in society, you get destroyed. But it’s wrong meaning that there are words you should not use to refer to people, but there’s always a context in which a word being said could be justifiable. For example, reading back in testimony in a court what a person said. The court stenographer is not a bad person for reading back what was said.

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: But this is about ultimate control — control of your mind and control of your actions, obviously, as well — and the reason I think the Yale Law School thing is so interesting — and Clay well knows this because he went to a very esteemed law school, by the way. But Yale school is the number one law school in the country.

    CLAY: Yeah.

    BUCK: If you get into Yale Law School, our buddy, geopolitical strategist Elbridge Colby was a friend of mine from the D.C. days. He’s a Yale law guy, super smart. You go to Yale law, everyone is supposed to essentially genuflect at your legal altar. These places are turning out woke maniacs. I want people to understand across the country: The woke maniacs don’t change. They take their little Yale Law School golden ticket to the top of the legal profession.

    They clerk for federal judges. They become federal judges. They become prosecutors. They become the top partners at law firms. Just to remind everybody, Donald Trump — the sitting President of the United States — had a tough time getting legal counsel for the fake Russia collusion bullcrap that they pulled against him because people didn’t want to be ostracized.

    CLAY: Yeah.

    BUCK: They didn’t want to be untouchable in the legal profession. Clay, I knew other people working in the White House didn’t have a lot of money. And it was tough for them to get the lawyers they wanted because nobody wanted to be associated with, think of this, a lawyer who doesn’t want to be associated with giving the proper defense to White House employees of a sitting president? This is what the woke legal madness has done. And props to Bari Weiss for dealing this in her Substack and having people write about it and do it so well.

    CLAY: No doubt, and I’m old school in the sense I think the ACLU should defend all speech, right, not just speech they find to be acceptable on any given day. To me, John Adams, when he was defending the British Red Coats, who had fired at the Boston Massacre up on the colonists, is what a lawyer should aspire to: The best possible defense. Buck, I’ve said this before on the show, but I’ve defended murderers.

    I’ve defended people accused of domestic violence. I’ve defended drug dealers in my young days as a lawyer. That’s not because I agree with what they have been accused of, but because, to me, a lawyer has a zealous duty to defend to their utmost ability, even — even — people and even in situations where you would personally not be on the same side morally as the people you’re defending.

    And so, this idea that has taken root in law schools of basically the woke universe taking over the legal profession… Buck, look at the ACLU. It’s a great example of an organization that in the 1970s was willing to defend Neo-Nazis who were marching in Skokie, Illinois — there were a lot of Holocaust survivors there — not because certainly they respected the opinions of the Nazis in any way, but because they valued our First Amendment and our legal system more than they did the heinous beliefs that were being defended that day. That’s what lawyers should do: Stand up for principle over politics, and instead politics is overwhelming principle now.

    BUCK: We are watching right now, we are witnessing… Of course, this is, in the background of we have this Supreme Court nomination hearing underway right now and the senators are asking her questions. You and I both believe, Clay, and there’s been polling: Most of the GOP doesn’t even really care because they figure it’s either going to be Ketanji Brown Jackson or another left-wing activist. So what difference does it really make?

    She’ll get through, and this is why we’re not spending… We’ll spend some time on the conversation today. But in the background of this we are witnessing in this country, and if you speak to… Clay, you know about this, you’ve seen this, friends of yours who are lawyers. I have friends and family who are lawyers as well. The transformation in the last 20 years where the left has gone from seeing what is a system of justice through our law, to a system of power and the wielding of power.

    This is why they’re abandoning core principles like the right to a defense for everybody. This just played out in the previous administration under Donald Trump. Do you think it also might have played out, folks…? I ask you this question, for anyone who says this sounds like law school insider-y stuff: How many judges wouldn’t take any of the election challenges, wouldn’t even look at the election challenges Trump and his lawyers are bringing?

    They threw them out right away, wouldn’t bring them to court. Maybe some were legit; maybe some weren’t. Do you think it might make some impact on this when you have people coming out of law schools, particularly elite law schools, who were effectively insane leftists who believe that their goal is not a justice system in this country, but “righting the wrongs” in a Marxist sense “of the past” by having a disparate system of justice today?

    I think that really does matter. Here’s a quote that I think nails this home, Clay, on the Daily Mail piece: “Partners are being blindsided by associates who they think are liberals in their own image, but they’re not,” according to a lawyer in Washington D.C., “The associates want to burn the place down.”

    CLAY: (laughing)

    BUCK: Yep. That’s what I’m hearing from people all across the country, and for any of you who have ever had to go to court, for any who faced the justice system, for any who think their vote should account even though there are activist organizations, the corruption of the legal system by the left, wholesale, and the usage of law schools as indoctrination centers to do it is a major problem. This is like the deep state, but it’s the deep legal state.

    CLAY: I’ll give you an example, Buck. My wife is in law school right now. I was in law school 20 years ago. She experienced what law school was like 20 years ago, compares it to now. It’s a time warp. It’s crazy how different the overall vibe is, and not just because — by the way, I do think this factors in, because it dehumanizes much — the last two years, law school students have had to wear masks.

    Think how crazy that is, Buck. If you are a 2L right now — they call first year 1L, 2L, 3L, and it takes three years to graduate. If you are 2L right now, you’re coming up on the end of your second year of law school; your entire law school training you’ve been forced to wear a mask, everywhere. In class. You’ve been restricted in how much you can travel.

    And I think that’s only going to accelerate the insanity, because it dehumanizes so much and makes everything… It is just going to… This is an underrated story. My jaw dropped when I saw that protest at Yale Law School, smartest lawyers in the country. Buck, they study law at Yale. One reason people love to go there is they don’t give grades. That’s how cocky they are.

    BUCK: They want to change the administration standards dramatically, by the way, so it’s really hard for some to get in, a lot easier for some people to get in, and they don’t want those disparities to be apparent over the three years of law school as in other places.

    CLAY: Even back 50 years ago, they did the pass/fail system. Which I was I was like, “Man, I would love to go to Yale.”

    BUCK: They can get away with because there’s not the same ranking so they can change their admission standards such that it doesn’t affect your perception.

    CLAY: You’re a made man or woman no matter what if you get in there. I think Stanford also does pass/fail, which is pretty incredible. That’s unheard of to be that exclusive, where you don’t even have to rank any of your students. You’re all supposed to be that elite.

    Recent Stories