×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Three Biggest Migration Losers: LA, NY, Chicago

25 Mar 2022

CLAY: New census data came out, and it shows the migration data in this country, from July of 2020 — shortly after covid had taken off — to July of 2021. The three largest losers in population, Buck: LA County, New York (Manhattan), and Cook County, Illinois (which is Chicago). Does that surprise you at all, Buck? I mean, that is exactly the three that I would guess, if I were going to say where the population moved from. Because those are the people that had moved into my city, into my state, that I meet the most frequently. New York City, LA, and Chicago. People abandoning those three cities in large numbers.

BUCK: I’ve seen that 300,000 people have left New York as a number that’s being shared around. Now, I assume that’s almost entirely from New York City and its environs. So that’s a stunning number. Think about it. That’s half the city of Miami by way of comparison. Imagine if half of — and I think Austin is about maybe half a million. Does that sound right?

CLAY: Well, they have the “metropolitan area.” Depends how you define it.

BUCK: Yeah. They always do that.

CLAY: If you use the county itself, where everybody is based.

BUCK: I think the actual city is like half a million, 600,000 — we thank all of our Austin listeners, at KLBJ — but I think that that’s an enormous number. But what’s amazing to me, I don’t know if anybody has an explanation for this, somehow, New York City has lost about 300,000 people, let’s say. Roughly that. Prices, for homes hire, and rental prices?

CLAY: Still going up.

BUCK: Never been higher, a rental. Never been higher. You’re paying more money now to rent in New York City, than you ever have. Three hundred thousand people fled this place, and the prices just keep going up, and the taxes are going to go up too, even more than they already have, by the way.

CLAY: I don’t understand that either, Buck. I wondered the same thing, because you would think the LA housing market has stayed white hot. New York, Chicago… Now, the housing market really kind of all over the country has gotten white hot. But those are the three cities that people have fled the most. Where have people moved? I thought this was interesting. This is not going to surprise our listeners down in Texas.

Five of the top ten counties to grow were in the state of Texas. Collin, Fort Bend, Williamson, Denton, and Montgomery County are the five that grew the most. The others were in Arizona. Maricopa County. That’s Phoenix, am I correct in that? I think. I believe. We’ll fact-check that, see if I blew that. But it’s Maricopa County in Arizona, which I believe is the Phoenix area. Riverside County in California, which I believe is kind of the inland empire where people are fleeing.

I think I’m correct in that. Might be wrong on that one too (chuckles) Now to Florida. Not surprising. Polk and Lee County, and then Utah as well. So people are fleeing blue states and blue cities, and they are overwhelmingly moving to red states by and large, or red state governors, if, Buck — this is always important, and the Corona Bros and the crazy people out there who are committed to covid — f all of these blue cities and states were so much safer, wouldn’t we see the reverse?

Wouldn’t people be saying, “Oh, my goodness, my family is in such danger! I’ve got to leave Florida! I’ve got to leave Texas. I’ve got to leave Tennessee. All these red state policies! We’re in danger of dying.” Instead, we’re seeing people leave the Draconian, restricted covid places, the places that are the most restrictive of personal freedom, and move to places that have the least restrictions.

BUCK: Well, also, when you start to hear from people in some of these states, I think that there is a concern. I hear this from my two brothers. My one brother is a permanent Floridian now. The other is kind of half and half in New York and Florida. And they will say, oh, well, people want to make sure, “If you come down here from New York, you vote the right way.” This migration wave for all of you in Tennessee and Texas and Florida, is —

CLAY: That’s a concern for people down here.

BUCK: I know. It’s generally the same people from the blue states though, who are fleeing. It is the Republicans or independents or right-leaning, right-of-center folks, who have just said, I can’t do this anymore. By the way, the crime thing is another huge component of this.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Covid was bad, for sure. But covid was bad, and crime got a lot worse, and what everybody was being told — and this has not been discussed nearly enough (and we will remedy that on this show, Clay, in the weeks ahead), we were told that the crime wave is so bad, because of covid lockdowns, which never made any sense whatsoever.

CLAY: That’s a lie. Yeah.

BUCK: It was progressive, left-wing, anti-cop, pro-criminal policies. The rise of the BLM movement, the fear of corporate America. The bending of the knee. The Democrat Party’s cowardice. That is what led to the huge surge in violent crime all across the country. And in places like New York City, you were treated — and this is true in Chicago. It’s true in San Francisco. It’s true in Los Angeles.

You’re treated to being told, “You’re a bad person if you won’t mask up, and how dare you call the police on that guy who is relieving himself in front of your building, you know, with children walking across the street in broad daylight while he has been a heroin needle sticking out of his arm. How dare you think the police should do something about him, you unmasked bandit!” People finally reached the breaking point. They finally decided, enough is enough.

CLAY: That is such a fear. What your brother talked about, if you live in Florida or if you live in Tennessee or if you live in Texas, these bastions of freedom, and there are other states certainly that have that same bastion. Utah, although they have an idiot governor, who is not standing up for athletes out there. That’s still got me fired up. People who are flooding into Arizona has a Republican governor right now. We’ll see what happens with Mark Kelly in the Senate. But there’s the fear that they’re going to turn a red state, either purple or blue, like what happened in Georgia, like what’s almost happened in North Carolina.

BUCK: I’m gonna tell all the Tennesseans, all right? We’re sending you our best from New York. Okay? We’re sending you the good ones from New York, overwhelmingly. Not everybody, there’s going to be some crazy libs in there too. But New York is sending you our best.

CLAY: Yeah, the locust analogy is the fear. I talked to a lot of Texans about this. You destroy where you used to be, and then you move into a new area like a plague of locust and immediately bring with it the left-wing policies that cause you to destroy where you were, and bring it with you. But I think the Florida data is fascinating on this, Buck, because we have Ron DeSantis on.

I think we have Ron DeSantis on next week, if I’m not mistaken. We have to schedule him for next week. But we talked for him, about what the data was showing inside the state of Florida. Florida, for the first time ever, now has more registered Republicans than Democrats. Never occurred in the history of the state, and by the time we get to November, there are projections that suggest, there could be 250,000 more Republicans, in the state of Florida than Democrats. Which really, I think, Buck, is going to take Florida out of the toss-up category and put it pretty squarely in the Republican side of the ledger.

BUCK: Right. And that’s a perfect example of exactly what I’m talking about.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: And by “best,” I just mean mostly like-minded. The New Yorkers listening to us now are obviously like-minded with me, and we’re in this together, my fellow New Yorkers.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Mayor Adams Sued for NYC’s Vax Mandate Double Standard

25 Mar 2022

BUCK: I’m happy to see that in New York City with the absurd double standard in place, of people who are really important, rich, and famous — professional athletes on teams like the Mets, the Yankees, the Nets, the Knicks — are exempt from the city vaccine mandate now, thanks to Mayor Eric Adams, but other people aren’t. Now fired New York City workers are suing Adams, because they’re saying, “Oh, look, this whole thing is arbitrary and capricious,” because it is.

So this is good to see. I mentioned before, we’ll continue to have covid accountability or lockdown accountability and also illegal immigration be the themes that we hit on this show, irrespective of what the national Democrat-corporate media does. Also, Clay, we were hitting on this yesterday — you were fired up about it and I feel the same way — pushing for people who were fired to get back their job to get backpay.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: And to get fully reinstated with an apology, if possible, for the firings that have occurred. They fired over 1,000 employees in New York, for not getting the vaccine, on what basis, now? Now that we see if you’re really important, the virus doesn’t affect you the same way, apparently? It’s absurd.

CLAY: (chuckling) Look, Eric Adams made the right decision to end this absurdity that Kyrie Irving could sit court side and watch a basketball game, but he couldn’t play in one, that the New York Mets and Yankees weren’t going to be able to play in baseball games if they hadn’t gotten their covid shots. But rectifying that wrong, just further illuminates the much more significant wrong.

Because pro athletes make enough money that if they’re not able to work, their families are not gonna suffer. Over 1,500 people in New York City — school teachers, firefighters, policemen and women — lost their jobs because they rightly, in my opinion, looked at the data and said, “I don’t need to get this covid shot. I’m not going to be forced to do so,” and I don’t think we’ll ever get an apology, Buck. I just…

I don’t think we’ll ever get an apology. But rehiring those people and giving them back pay will would be an acknowledgment of how wrong the policy was. And Eric Adams, frankly, Buck, has the ability to do this because this is Bill de Blasio’s policy. So there isn’t necessarily him having to acknowledge this was the wrong policy to have implemented in the same way that he would if he had been the mayor when all of this became a reality.

He’s coming in at a time where he can rectify some of the wrongs of his predecessor, Bill de Blasio. He’s clearly willing to do it for athletes. But we can’t have a standard for covid shots where the richer and more famous you are, the less necessity there is for you to get the covid shot. Everybody needs to be treated equally in this scenario.

BUCK: We saw it with masks over and over again too, right?

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: So there’s always been this, “The rules are for the peasants, because they’re dirty and spread the virus, but the important people…” Whether it’s the mayor of Chicago, the governor of New York (when it was Cuomo), the mayor of San Francisco, all these people that were caught without… Deborah Birx, right? Hanging out, not social distancing with family. We saw it so many times, we can’t even give you all the instances of people having the double standard in effect here.

So, Clay, I agree, that the right… It’s kind of the right decision for the wrong reason when it comes to Eric Adams. Clearly, it’s professional sports teams are important, so fine, I’ll bend the knee to that. He’s not agreeing though that there wasn’t a basis for the scientifically — which to me leaves open the possibility that they’ll bring it back. And beyond that, I think that this is now going to be in the blue cities it’s, “Okay. This is a seasonal thing. We’re reasonable. It’s seasonal! So we’ll institute the thing as we have to when it comes up, and then we’ll get rid of it.”

I think their version of the new normal is every winter we have covid vaccine mandates for some businesses and some people, and we have mask mandates indoors. I think that’s what a lot of New York is getting ready for and Los Angeles. I don’t know. Probably not Houston, thankfully, for those folks down there.

Recent Stories

Poll: Majority of Democrat Voters Don’t Want to Say Gay

25 Mar 2022

BUCK: Here we are, right now, Clay, seeing that there are issues where Democrats go on offense, until the moment that the American people find out what’s really going on, and then you say, “Oh, hold on a second. They aren’t with them on this issue.” And to that, I bring you that more than 52% of Democrats — according to the recent Politico/Morning Consult poll — support the Florida parental bill, which they had dubbed the “don’t say gay” bill.

They had made this up. The activists came up with this. They renamed the bill something that, “Oh, of course!” It’s a little bit like Black Lives Matter. “How can you be opposed to Black Lives Matter as a movement, because the name is… Of course, black lives matter!” But the whole point is, you call it something that if anybody opposes you, they’re automatically on the defensive, because, “What do you mean that you can’t say ‘gay’?”

Well, no one says that, but that didn’t really matter. It turns out that Democrat opposition to parental involvement at the school board level and beyond when it comes to the educational of their children is not popular to the American people, that this game they play of Critical Race Theory isn’t really a thing….” You see, Chris Rufo, who has been raising the public awareness of Critical Race Theory indoctrination in schools? He got called out on The View by Sunny Hostin, and I retweeted this.

CLAY: (laughing) No, they won’t have him.

BUCK: He wants to go on The View and debate —

CLAY: Credit to him.

BUCK: I mean, he absolutely should get on. She trashed him, called him a troll, said that he’s basically lying about Critical Race Theory being taught in schools. I know Chris. I’ve interviewed him many times. He’s not a troll.

CLAY: We’ve had him on this show.

BUCK: Yeah. Of course. Like I said, I’ve known Chris for years. I’ve talked to him many times about this, and he should have the opportunity to respond. Point here being, when people find out more about what the Democrats have done over the last year, Clay, they don’t like it.

CLAY: I think, Buck, what is becoming increasingly clear is that Democrats have a massive, massive issue with trying to make social media happy and the fact that the vast majority of their party doesn’t agree with what makes social media happy. The “don’t say gay” bill — so-called, falsely called, “don’t say gay” bill — is a perfect example, because parents of kindergarteners, first, second, third graders are not going to be in favor of sexuality instruction in public schools to kids of those ages whether they’re Democrats, Republicans, or independents.

And you know that Democrats are getting slaughtered out there. And they know it. Deep down, they know it, because in the war of ideas, that’s what the state of Virginia. That’s to a large extent, what almost flipped the state of New Jersey. We we’re talking about two states that Joe Biden won comfortably and they’re swinging, ten, 12, 14 points in the other direction, and if that can happen — and this is why I say 2022 is so intriguing.

What happens in a true landslide election, Buck. Yes, you win closed races. But you have people that get crushed that had no idea they were actually in danger. And we almost saw that with New Jersey. Right? Nobody was actually talking about the governor of New Jersey being in actual peril. Now, we talked a lot about what was happening in Virginia and what the outcome was going to be there with McAuliffe was going up against Youngkin.

But nobody… I didn’t see a single person, Buck, say, “Hey, you know what you need to pay attention to, the Democratic governor of New Jersey. He’s going to be on tenterhooks here, the tiny margin of whether he will win or lose,” and that’s what they’re afraid of, because their ideas don’t poll well, and their ideas don’t reflect well. White liberals like them because they’re overwhelming involved on Twitter. But Hispanic, Asian, black voters? They don’t think that their kids will get in first, second, third grade, and public schools are talking about sex.

BUCK: So they’re starting to wake up to exactly what you’re saying —

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: — because the only thing that makes the Democrats change course is, “Oh, my gosh, we’re actually going to lose power?” Whatever they have to do to get there, is fine. They don’t care. But if it means they’re not going to be able to make you do what they want to make you do because they don’t actually have the votes and they don’t have the system at their disposal, the apparatus is no longer under their control, they change things.

The New York Times, the last day or so, “Democrats Are Making Life Too Easy for Republicans,” and this is just the start of this piece by this guy, Thomas Edsall. “As the 2022 midterms draw into view, the question arises: To what degree are Democratic difficulties inevitable? Ruy Teixeira, a co-editor of The Liberal Patriot, argues in an email that ‘the cultural left has managed to associate the Democratic Party with a series of views on crime, immigration, policing, free speech and, of course, race and gender that are quite far from those of the median voter.

“That’s a success for the cultural left, but the hard reality is that it’s an electoral liability for the Democratic Party.'” Absolutely true. It’s almost like what we say on the show every day. We are talking to people about the reality that is playing across the country, which is that the woke left has essentially hijacked… They’re not just a fringe of the Democrat Party, they have hijacked the Democrat Party.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: They’re in the cockpit of the Democrat Party, and that’s what Biden has allowed to happen. He was essentially a head fake toward normalcy and the middle. The woke left is calling all the shots, and the American people aren’t with them. Not at all, man.

CLAY: Which is why I think 2022 and 2024 — the story of 2022 and the 2024 — is going to be the destruction of the Democratic Party, as it presently exists. There are… I really believe this, Buck. I believe that we’re going to see such an onslaught in 2022 and such an onslaught in 2024, that the Democratic Party is going to have to go back to reconstruct itself, and they’re going to have to bury wokism.

They’re going to have to bury identity politics. They’re going to have to bury cancel culture, because the overwhelming majority of even their own party, repudiates the ideas that they’re embracing on a day-to-day basis, and it’s going to be ugly. People talk about the Republicans in trouble, because of January 6th and everything else? No, no, no.

They’re missing the bigger story here, which is, they have allowed — “hijack” is the right word. They’ve allowed social media blue checks to hijack their party. Remember, I believe if you look at the overall trajectory of the blue checks Twitter, it’s Portland, right? It’s basically a Portland congressional district is what the overall method and madness of Twitter would be on a day-to-day basis. It’s Democrats plus 23 or 24 points, not a remotely competitive marketplace, and they’ve convinced themselves that it’s the real world, when it’s not — and it’s a big part of why they’re going to get their ass kicked in 2022.

Recent Stories

Read Our Guest Kenny Xu’s Latest Column

25 Mar 2022

Kenny Xu, president of the advocacy group Color Us United and author of “An Inconvenient Minority” joins C&B today.

Read His Latest Piece Here:

Publius National Post Substack: American Express Diversity Policies are Un-American — Kenny Xu

Recent Stories

Ginni Thomas Texts Are Big News, But Not Hunter’s Laptop?

25 Mar 2022

CLAY: This Ginni Thomas discussion. Have you paid attention to everything surrounding it?

BUCK: Oh, we’re going to dive into this, my friend, for sure. Yes.

CLAY: So Ginni Thomas, married to Clarence Thomas, her actions as a married woman, being affiliated with Clarence Thomas, are a huge story right now. Front-page news, lead stories everywhere. Even though she’s an acknowledging conservative and has big relationships in D.C., nothing that has been attributed to Ginni Thomas… They had a New York Times magazine piece on her.

Nothing that has been attributed to her has surprised me because she’s pretty transparent, straightforward about what she believes, publicly and privately. Yet, we are being told right now, Buck, that everything surrounding Ginni Thomas is a massive news story that needs to be covered, based on her proximity to Clarence Thomas, while simultaneously people are waving their arms and saying, “Nothing matters about Hunter Biden because he’s a private citizen; we shouldn’t be concerned at all, about anything related to him.” So I’m just kind of fascinated by the dynamic in which you can wave off any responsibility or discussion, in any way —

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: — surrounding Hunter Biden by saying, “Well, he’s the president’s son. He’s not an elected official. Why does it matter?” Yet for Ginni Thomas everything she does has to be immediately attributed to Clarence Thomas and it’s some existential threat to American democracy.

BUCK: All true. I would also add for me, the bigger concern, Clay, is that this committee that is looking into “the insurrection” is using police state tactics.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: They’re pulling the phone records of private citizens, and then leaking them to the public to humiliate people.

CLAY: I agree. We talked about this a while ago.

BUCK: It’s not the first time they’ve done it, right, but let’s just understand. This is how — and we might return to this. We’ll hold this one for later, but we’re getting into it now. We’ll take some calls. We’ll take some calls in a little bit, folks. They have decided, that they will go scorched earth on this January 6th thing, they’ll say it’s insurrection, and this is how the left plays the game: They will humiliate your wife if they don’t like your politics and you’re a judge, you’re a member of Congress. They don’t care. It doesn’t matter.

This is just about humiliation. Clay, there’s no legal or ethical anything having to do with Ginni Thomas, sending text messages as a private citizen to Mark Meadows saying, “I think the election was stolen.” A lot of people thought that. A lot of people listening to this show still think and thought that, right? There’s no problem. It’s called America. You’re allowed to think what you want about a very contested and shady election, but they just want to humiliate her. That’s the point. It’s about the humiliation, ’cause that’s how they play the game.

CLAY: Here’s what I’ll say, Buck. I don’t think it’s very humiliating. Usually humiliation occurs at least in my experience, when something that is otherwise not public about you, becomes public that you wish was not public. Ginni Thomas’ political views, are not in some way, a secret. The idea that she would believe that there was a rig job going on with the 2020 election? Yeah. I 100% would expect that that is what she would believe, and the texts that she is sending are exactly the texts that I would expect for her to be sending to people at the White House. I don’t understand how this is in any way newsworthy or surprising.

BUCK: There was always a sense of violation when your private texts —

CLAY: Yes. I get that.

BUCK: — to somebody as an individual become a front-page story at the Washington Post because the Democrats want to pretend, “It’s about the sanctity of our election!”

CLAY: But when the story is telling something publicly, than it would be privately, to me, I’m like, “Well, this sucks. It’s a disgrace that private text messages ever get leaked in my opinion.”

BUCK: Yeah. She was keeping it real.

CLAY: But when they just further elucidate what you already believed, it’s like, “Well, that person is an honest, transparent figure. They’re not pretending to be someone they’re not.”

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: That’s what immediately comes to mind.

Recent Stories

Joe Contradicts Staff, Says Sanctions Won’t Deter Putin

25 Mar 2022

BUCK: “Their intention is to have a deterrent effect. That’s what the sanctions are for.”

BUCK: Welcome back to Clay and Buck. I just wanted you to hear that. You probably recognize some of those voices. You got Psaki Bomb and the national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, who really… I don’t know how that guy became that, but he was a very big Russia collusion truther. So that’s all you need for a job in the Biden administration. But you heard them all saying it. “It’s about deterrence.” Now, that’s just interesting, because while this war is waging in Ukraine…

We’re going to have Jim Carafano. He’s an Army veteran at Heritage Foundation, national security expert, friend of mine, great guy. He’ll be joining Clay and me in a few minutes just to talk about where we are with this whole conflict. Just to update you, right? We have the biggest war in Europe since World War II. It’s important what’s going on. We have Biden talking about food shortages. This never should have happened. We never should have been in a position to have to even have to deal with this conflagration. If it had been prevented, right, that’s the best. They said sanctions will do it, and Biden said just last night, this…

CLAY: (chuckling)

BUCK: You know, Clay, I think that the reason we keep talking about sanctions as a deterrent, is because in the weeks leading up to the conflict, they kept saying, “These sanction are a deterrent.”

CLAY: Yeah, and it’s just amazing how quickly people are allowed to move on from whatever they’ve argued as if they never argued it before.

Recent Stories

Howard Stern Has Turned Into a Neurotic Old Lady

25 Mar 2022

CLAY: We talked about New York City starting to get a little more sane in terms of the rules that they are putting in place. One of New York City’s most famous residents, however — relating to covid, that is, the rules that they’re changing — Howard Stern, is furious. I just can’t get over the fact that Howard Stern, who is one of the most rebellious radio people of all time — and for those of you out there listening, I think it’s fair to say that Rush Limbaugh and Howard Stern are the two most iconic radio people, by far, in the last 50 years, Buck.

I don’t even know who would be in that category alongside of those two guys, and we’re obviously honored to be sitting in the chair, alongside where Rush — and talking to all of you, where many of you have spent decades listening to him. But a lot of people have also spent decades listening to Howard Stern, and of anyone in the media, I’m not sure that anyone is crazier, Buck, than Howard Stern. Here he is on his show, complaining about the mask mandate being lifted in New York City, and saying, “the wackos are winning.” Listen to this.

BUCK: He sounds like a neurotic little old cat lady, honestly. This is absurd. He sounds like someone who is always calling the police because a neighbor went by on a skateboard. What is he even talking about?

CLAY: Howard Stern is not an unintelligent person, and he’s also not someone who is opposed to sometimes being on an island with an opinion that is not shared by the majority of people. I think it’s such a fascinating instructive window into the psychology of some people, Buck. I know that Stern was a germaphobe and had high levels of anxiety surrounding germs in general, even before covid — and to your point, Buck, I believe what we’ve done is the exact opposite of what Stern is arguing here.

I think we’ve allowed a small minority of anxiety-ridden germophobes to dictate what our national policy has been. And those people are so fear-laden, that they won’t even look at the data and recognize that masks make no sense! Now, every single day, we gain a few people. And I know that we were talking about off the air, the Politico report, because they polled parents. There’s still a lot of parents, though, who believe their kids need to be in a mask.

BUCK: So it’s multi-faceted. The Fauci-ite mask madness. The core, the base, the vanguard, the shock troops of double masking are people who really truly terrified. And for them — I’ve said this for a long time — this is an anxiety napkin. You have said kids with security blankets. Right? This is an adult version of a facial security blanket. “I wear my maks, so I’m safe.” Somehow, I’m still safe, when I pull my mask down to eat and drink and do other things or to fix it or whatever.

Because the virus goes, “Oh, hold on. He called a time-out. So I’m not going to freely circulate in the air anymore.” Never mind the fact that you actually look at the size, the microns of that represented virus versus the mesh of most of the cloth masks that we’ve been wearing, and people have been pointing out from the very beginning, the virus actually easily passes through the air passage above and below the mask, as well as — this part of it I say, I wasn’t as into in the beginning, but as well as — through some of these masks.

So here you have those people, but you also have the political affiliation component of it, Clay. I think that became certainly the bigger aspect of it, and now it lingers because there are a lot of people, for whom it’s like a symbol of their adherence to the Democrat norm and of their defiance of the evil, red state Trumpers who want them to be able to breathe air. Think about what this argument boils down. You and I sit here telling people, “It’s okay. Just breathe normally again. You can do it. It’s actually fine.

“It really makes no difference. You should just go about your life breathing as human beings have been breathing throughout all of human history,” and the left says, “No, that’s crazy. I want to be uncomfortable and breathe through a piece of cloth all take, because that makes me feel better about myself.” Howard Stern is clearly in that category. He also, to your point, doesn’t know anything about what the actual data shows, not only about masking, but even about vaccine efficacy or anything else. But he doesn’t care.

CLAY: And this ties in with the Politico poll that we were talking about before the show… Sorry, it’s a Harvard poll; I’m reading from the Politico article about it. This is interesting: 40% of parents of school-aged children believe that masking harmed their children’s overall school experience. I can’t believe it’s only 40%, by the way. But this is the interesting part, Buck: Only 11% said it helped.

So if you’re a parent of a school-aged child — and certainly, I’m in that camp right now. I have three school-aged kids. I see parents every single day making like a lightbulb moment recognize that the masking didn’t make any sense — and over half, nearly half of parents said that masks make no difference. Now, that’s disappointing that it’s only half basically of parents saying masks made no difference. But I take away, when four-in-ten say it harmed their kid’s school experience, and only 11% said it helps, this matters. Because the Fauci-ites, Buck, based on the numbers going up in Europe, are already starting to make arguments that they may need to bring back masks on kids in school and masks in general.

BUCK: “We got to get those….” Well, what did he say to Leonardo DiCaprio in Wolf of Wall Street? “Those are rookie numbers. We gotta get those numbers up!”

CLAY: Yeah. The great Matthew McConaughey and Leonardo DiCaprio scene.

BUCK: Apparently, McConaughey used to do that just to get himself psyched up before a scene sometimes —

CLAY: That doesn’t surprise me at all.

BUCK: — and Scorsese saw it and said, “No. Do that in the scene.” Anyway, so, yeah, “Those are rookie numbers.” Forty percent said it harmed their kids? No, no, no. It needs to be 80%. It needs to be only the 20% of wacko libs who think that we can’t define a woman and they should double mask alone in the shower, “just to be safe from the virus.” It has to be down to that layer, that sliver of the American electorate before we can actually stop the pressure campaign here, Clay, because they were wrong. They were wrong all along. But notice does anyone…? This is interesting. I was thinking about this the other day and I was going to text you. When was the last time a blue check came after you on any of this stuff?

CLAY: It’s been a while.

BUCK: Yeah! It’s been a while.

CLAY: It’s a great point. Yeah.

BUCK: Early on, I had blue checks, “Why are you so mean? You don’t care if old people die. You’re evil,” and everything else. Because I was saying maybe lockdowns — which now we see increased alcoholism or alcohol-related deaths by 25%.

CLAY: Yes, that’s right.

BUCK: Tens of thousands of people, mostly in their prime earning and living years, raising families. Tens of thousands of people die. Anyway, couldn’t talk about that. Couldn’t talk about the missed cancer screenings. Couldn’t talk about any of these things, or else you were a bad person. I haven’t had a blue check want to throw down with me over this stuff in at least three or four months now. At least three or four months.

CLAY: It is interesting, Buck. I will say, my audience, when any of those blue checks come after me, and I just kind of put it out — my audience, our audience. They’re really funny. But they are also vicious in destroying the mask paparazzi out there. The blue checks who come after you all the time. So I think a lot of those guys are scared. I think that one of the great lessons that you learn is that Twitter gives these blue checks to anybody, and a lot of those guys and girls don’t have an audience.

So they just run around popping off all day, and there’s nobody that actually supports anything that they’re saying — and then they step into the dojo, so to speak, into the Thunderdome, and they were not anticipating the blowback that they were going to get. So I appreciate all of you, who got Buck and my’s back, @ClayTravis, @BuckSexton out there for the arguments that we’re making.

Recent Stories

Biden Promises Worldwide Food Shortages

25 Mar 2022

BUCK: From Build Back Better to go broke filling up your gas tank, and let’s hope Moscow doesn’t fire nukes at us in about a year. That’s how quickly that transition happened. Welcome back to Clay and Buck. Oh, in case that’s not enough, now you also have to consider… Let’s remember what we were promised here. Let’s remember what Joe Biden came into office saying he would get, he would do, and where we are now, and throw in the mix, “Folks, there are probably going to be worldwide food shortages.” Oh, I’m serious.

BUCK: Clay, food is about to get a whole lot more expensive. Russia and Ukraine are enormous exporters of wheat, and guess where the wheat crop is? Not actually being harvested, planted, et cetera, obviously, in the midst of the conflict zone. Everything is going to get more expensive. Food shortages could get really ugly.

CLAY: Well, and what’s difficult about this situation with the food shortage is — as you well know, Buck — the expectation of food shortages often can create food shortages. We saw this happen back in March of 2020 when suddenly you couldn’t buy toilet paper anywhere, not because there was actually a toilet paper shortage, but because there was a run on toilet paper, because people were afraid it wasn’t going to exist. So there’s still somebody out there that has eight years of toilet paper stacked up in your closets.

BUCK: Yeah. People who bought for days felt that they made a great investment.

CLAY: There you go: 200-square feet of Buck’s 600-square-feet apartment is just toilet paper still.

BUCK: There you go.

CLAY: You were on the ball. Making sure you had it.

BUCK: Ready to rock.

Recent Stories

Our Guest Jim Carafano’s Latest Piece

25 Mar 2022

Lt. Col. Jim Carafano, VP of National Security and Foreign Policy at The Heritage Foundation joins Clay and Buck today.

Read His Latest:

The Heritage Foundation: In a New Kind of War, the Old Wars of Ideas Are Back — James Jay Carafano

Recent Stories

You Gotta See This North Korean Propaganda Video

25 Mar 2022

Recent Stories