×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Covid Latest: Shanghai, Kyrie Stands Up, Trump Calls for End to Mandates

28 Mar 2022

CLAY: China locking down Shanghai, Buck, which, I mean, the zero-covid strategy in general to me has completely failed. And what’s interesting is two years after — more than two years now after the initial outbreak in Wuhan, we’re talking about China being the only country, I believe, Buck, in the world that is still trying to embrace a zero covid strategy. Australia, New Zealand, island nations have abandoned the zero-covid idea. China now locking down the second biggest city in its country.

BUCK: And there’s a huge problem with this because when places like Australia and New Zealand were pretending like they had figured out some… Here was their covid protection strategy: Be on an island on the other side of the world and don’t let anyone in or out of your country.

CLAY: Yes. (laughing) Yes.

BUCK: That will kind of work for a while as it did, but we couldn’t do that in America. That wasn’t going to work in the Eurasian landmass. It wasn’t going to work in south America. You know, if you have an island nation with a small population relative to, you know, relative to square mile, you can actually do this at some level.

CLAY:Yes.

BUCK: But now what we see is what some of us, like you and me and others, Clay, were warning all along is, the moment you open up we are going to have covid. Because we know the vaccines do not stop spread. They may mitigate at some level spread. We have to see the numbers on this. But you’re gonna have a population with no, basically no, very little natural immunity and you’re gonna be entirely dependent on vaccines that do fade — again — according to the CEOs of these companies.

We no longer have to go, “I don’t know if I’m allowed to say that.” They fade rapidly. And so this is why Australia has had the huge rise in cases. Austria’s had this huge rise in cases. That’s obviously not an island nation, but another place that thought it had done really well. But in the context of China, Clay, they just were told on Sunday shut down for Monday, and there are fights breaking out at grocery stores, fistfights.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: There’s video of this stuff because people are in a panic, and this what you see is an authoritarian state like China doesn’t care. They don’t sit there and say, “Wow, you know, maybe we were too heavy-handed with this.” Of course not. The Chinese Communist Party is always heavy-handed. But I think we should look at what’s going on in this country where we’ve walked away from some of this stuff on a temporary basis, as we keep saying. They have not abandoned this. They have not gotten ride of even all of the mandates. New York City still has… Although Kyrie is calling for all of them to be lifted.

CLAY: Yeah, Kyrie Irving — and we’ve talked about this, because the mayor last week in New York, Eric Adams, walked back the requirement that all employees have to be vaccinated, allowed celebrities and athletes as Major League Baseball’s opening day will be next week, as it’s getting closer and closer. He allowed everybody to go back to work if you’re a celebrity or you’re an athlete.

Kyrie Irving, to his credit, has said, “No, no, no, all the people, all of the unvaccinated people out there who lost their jobs,” and I think there are 1400, at least, New York City employees — teachers, firemen, police officers, “All those people deserve to get their job back,” and, man, I gotta give a lot of credit to Kyrie for speaking out and being a voice of sanity in an insane world when many people in professional athletics bent the knee and got a covid shot that they didn’t need because they were never remotely under danger.

By the way, on China, Buck, the thing that China’s going to run into — and I think it’s gonna be significant — is they’ve had almost no natural spread of the virus because of their zero-covid strategy. And so if you look at what happened in Hong Kong and you look also at what has happened in Australia and New Zealand, the rates of covid infection explode in an exponential fashion there because they didn’t have 2020 real substantial spread of the virus in 2021, and all of these different two-year processes by which a huge percentage of people listening to us right now, Buck, are either vaxxed or oftentimes both, have been exposed to the virus. I’ve had it twice. You’ve had it twice. We have a lot of natural immunity out there.

BUCK: And yet there are people that are still — and they proclaim this stuff on Twitter. There was a doctor over the weekend — I mean, again, a blue check, says he’s an MD, I believe. You know, who really knows? And he tweeted out a photo of himself. So these are people that are making this part of the public. One thing for me, Clay, is that I never wanted to take photos of people in public it because I didn’t want to. I hate mask shamers.

CLAY: Yeah. It’s an awkward spot to be in. Yeah.

BUCK: But when people share photos of themselves with masks on say, “Look at me,” this guy over the weekend… I’m trying to find the exact tweet ’cause it went viral; everybody was saying, “My God.” He has a full on like gas mask looking respirator on in a grocery store. The guy looks like he’s maybe a few years older than you and me. And he’s basically calling out everybody who won’t wear one as, “Oh, my gosh, why aren’t you? Don’t you understand? Don’t you take the virus seriously?”

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: Kathy Griffin, who is an unfunny comedian — not as unfunny as Amy Schumer, who was somehow at the Oscars last night making really bad jokes and maybe we’ll make fun of one or two of them, remarkably successful for not being actually good at her job anyway. But she was tweeting out a photo of herself, Clay, what was it, getting her fourth shot and was praising CVS for giving her eight free covid tests, and she thinks this is great.

CLAY: Yes. She was posing like flexing, “Fourth shot, second covid booster, and they also gave me eight free tests when I got my fourth shot.” This is Kathy Griffin, D-list comedian, who posed, remember, memorably, with the severed head appearance of Donald Trump, which basically, even for Hollywood, put her on a different career trajectory than she otherwise would have been. But, yeah, these are the delusional rantings that we’re seeing. Here my fourth shot. Oh, I’m gonna fine! Except I’ve also got eight tests in the event that I still test positive for covid.

BUCK: And I was so happy to see that President Trump not far from — not too far, at least, right next to door state-wise to where I am here. He was at a rally over the weekend. And, Clay, former president Trump called for an end to all covid mandates. Play 15.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Another the top priority when Republicans take back Congress should be to pass a bill immediately terminating every single covid mandate.

CROWD: (cheering)

PRESIDENT TRUMP: No more lockdowns, no more restrictions, no more hysteria, and no more masks, please, finally. We don’t want our children going to school in masks. Now they’re saying the masks don’t work, and they still want the masks.

BUCK: This needs to be what happens because you should get Congress —

CLAY: Amen.

BUCK: People can say, “Oh, but it’s the states” or whatever. All right. Well, let’s get Congress, as soon as there’s a Republican majority, on the record and push with actual legislation for an end to all this stuff, an end to it on planes, an end to it everywhere. Be fascinating. I bet you there will be some places that try within the federal bureaucracy, notably the FAA, that may try to say, “Well, Congress doesn’t… They have to give us more time to figure this out or something.”

I just feel like there are people, Clay, for whom this is a religious belief now. I mean, this is something that they don’t want it to go away. It’s necessary for their psychological safety to be on a plane. Oh, Chris what’s his name from CNN? Is he from CNN, Mr. Cillizza?

I think he tweeted out over the weekend how upset he was on a couple on a plane with him that wouldn’t mask up, a blue check lib-journo type. This is what they actually think about.

CLAY: Absolute losers.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Women Callers Weigh In on the Will Smith-Chris Rock Slap

28 Mar 2022

CLAY: By the way, I asked for women to weigh in. We finished off last hour with Will Smith and Chris Rock discussion. Let us get a couple of these calls in from women. Haley in southern Utah, what did you think about what you saw last night, the slap heard ’round the world?

CALLER: Hey, guys, how you doing? Love your show. Thank you. I just… The comparison came to me how Sarah Huckabee Sanders was treated at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. They, of course, were making fun — and that’s what they do, they make fun — of her, but they went after her appearance, all these things.

CLAY: That’s right.

CALLER: And she sat there, and she took it with dignity, and he could have done that and talked to them afterwards, but he chose to make a scene and choose violence out of it. So again, it’s that liberal privilege. I think nothing nice will happen with it, and it just keeps happening in Hollywood.

CLAY: Great call. Roberta in Florida, I think, also wants to weigh in. What have you got, Roberta?

CALLER: So, I just wanted to make a point. You know, when the female commentators at the very beginning — Wanda Sykes, I believe — made a comment about Jada and Will and their open marriage and that was all okay. Nobody got upset about that.

CLAY: Yeah.

CALLER: And, you know, she was smiling. They were laughing. They thought that was all funny. So to me, this comment… I mean, now they’re saying, “Oh, she has some issue with her skin. That’s why she’s bald.”

BUCK: Alopecia is what they’ve been saying.

CALLER: Right, and I don’t think Chris Rock knew that, first of all. I don’t think he would have… You know. And so it’s just showing the classlessness that we’ve got with this. You know, I wasn’t even gonna watch last night and I thought, “Oh, I’m gonna watch it,” you know. But it just goes to show you, it’s more like a Jerry Springer show than, you know, somebody like — some actor with class like — Kevin Costner goes up there and says a nice speech, but then it’s overshadowed by something like this.

CLAY: Great call.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: Great call. I agree. Michelle in Draper, Utah, also wants to weigh in. What you got for us, Michelle?

CALLER: Hey, Clay and Buck. Thanks for taking my call. Doing a great job, guys. I just wanted to say that I just thought it was just shocking and disturbing that, you know, he has decades in this business, and to lead up to this big moment… You know, this is like a defining moment in his career.

CLAY: Yep.

CALLER: To finally get an Oscar for best actor? I mean, all the actors dream of that, and then he ruins it by behaving that way? I just… I was shocked. At first, I thought, “Is this a bit? Is this a joke?”

CLAY: I think most people did.

BUCK: I had to watch it back three times before I thought it was actually real that he even got hit. I just sort of assumed, although he did look… Everyone says, “Oh, he’s an actor.”

CLAY: He looked shook.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: He looked shook, Chris Rock did.

BUCK: Chris Rock is not that good of an actor.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: He’s a good comedian, folks. Like, I think that’s a different skill set, and he looked shaken up after that one. And everyone said afterwards that, you know, they had to figure it out. And I know… By the way, I totally agree with our caller. So there’s that. Good call.

CLAY: (laughing) Well, you know, Buck, some people tried to say, “Oh, this is him st…” That’s why I wanted to hear from women, because some people tried to argue, “Oh, this is standing up for his wife.” I don’t think most people felt like that. He’s 53, overreacting like he did is way too much.

BUCK: Some guy, like, puts his hand on your wife or says something to her at a bar in a public place, you don’t know what’s going on and you square off, and if you think you have to throw the first one maybe you could… This is at the Oscars, folks. Everyone’s in black ties. The guy’s making a joke; he’s a comedian.

CLAY: Yes.

Recent Stories

The Oscars Slap Heard Round the World

28 Mar 2022

CLAY: Were you watching the Oscars last night when the slap heard round the world happened?

BUCK: So I happened to be in… I’m in North Florida right now, which is lovely —

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: — and I happened to be watching the Oscars at a friend’s house. And we just turned it on, and sure enough, we were… I only watched maybe, I don’t know, 45 minutes of the Oscars the overall, and the slap happened so for anybody who missed it — which would be hard, because it is on many websites. It’s basically either Ukraine or the slap are the two big stories.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Which is pretty amazing. You know, one is a massive war in Europe with a nuclear-armed power and the other one is someone getting slapped in the face. So there’s a reason we opened with Biden and Ukraine first here, just to be very clear, and what’s going on in this country with the regime failing on so many levels. But now there is a lot of debates around this incident. I think originally people were saying it was faked. I don’t think anyone believes that. I shouldn’t say anyone. I think the consensus now, such as it is, that this was a real slap, at least.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: So he did hit him. The absolute worst take on it was from a CNN analyst who said that this is basically what you get because of Trump.

CLAY: Yeah. Which is so predictable and perfect.

BUCK: Amazing.

CLAY: Amazing.

BUCK: So, Clay, this is where you get into, I think this is very straightforward. You know, you have a comedian who’s being paid to do his job, which is to make fun of people, make jokes and make fun of people. He made a joke; Will Smith didn’t like it. Will Smith is totally within his rights, legal and otherwise, to shout out that he didn’t think this was funny, to go up to Chris Rock after he’s on stage and say, “You know, don’t say that. That’s not funny,” or “You should apologize or whatever.”

To walk up on stage and strike somebody? Again, I know there are people saying, “Buck, it was faked.” I don’t think so. I looked at it a lot. I don’t think it was fake. He definitely hit him. So now you’re just saying, “Why would Will Smith, the most famous — among the most famous — movie actors in the world…?” He doesn’t need publicity, folks.

CLAY: On a day that he’s potentially gonna win the Oscar too.

BUCK: The storyline doesn’t add up. I think he lost his temper, he went up, and he hit this guy in the face. But it’s amazing to see how many people, Clay, were like, “Yeah, that’s what you do.” I’m kind of sitting here like, “No.”

CLAY: In the event that people did you not hear it, we’ve got a couple of cuts here. Here is… I believe we have the joke and then the reaction. I think this is 17. Let’s listen to this.

BUCK: Yes. Play it.

BUCK: Big respect, I have to say, just to the fact that Chris Rock kind of kept going afterwards, because look, I think there’s many layers to this. And people were looking at the photos. This was almost like an Oliver Stone JFK movie, where everybody looking at different angles.

CLAY: Yeah, Zapruder film.

BUCK: Everybody was trying to figure out, “Oh, did he really hit him? Did he really?” One thing is, Clay, if someone walks up to you on the street and they are being aggressive, I think that you’re more ready. He’s at the Oscars on stage doing his job. If somebody walked in here and I knew who they were and I was doing my radio, I’d be like, “Hey, nice to see you.” I would not expect them slap me in the face doing my job. So I think that it’s also additionally uncalled for considering it was in a professional setting. It’s not even like this was just two guys in the street having a dispute.

CLAY: Yeah, and Chris Rock managed to take the slap and actually deliver the documentary. I don’t think Chris Rock has said anything since. Will Smith, amazingly — and this is where I really think it becomes such an intriguing discussion — goes up on stage, he assaults a comedian — and let’s be clear about this. What is this, like the 60th Oscar celebration, the hundredth, whatever the heck it is? It’s been going on for a long time, and that’s what the job of a comedian is.

They show up and they make jokes at the expense of the famous celebrities who are sitting down in the crowd. And Will Smith’s wife, Jada Pinkett Smith is a famous celebrity as well. So it’s not like she’s a civilian in the sense of, “Oh, well, nobody knows who she is, so he’s picking on the wife,” and even if he were, the idea that you would go up on stage and hit someone because you don’t like the joke that they’ve made?

I don’t know how many people in our audience — most people are not famous — but everybody, a large percentage I would think have been to a comedy club at some point and set — if you go to a comedy club and you sit down near the front of the stage, it’s oftentimes the case that the comedian will pick out something and have some fun with people down close even if you’re not famous. Let’s play the Will Smith. We’ll play the Will Smith reaction ’cause he goes on and he wins best actor.

This should be a crowning moment for his career, Buck. But they don’t do anything to him. I can’t think of any other public venue where you could assault a performer, go back down to your seat, stay there, nobody does anything to you, and then when he wins the best actor, everybody gives him a standing ovation like he didn’t just assault the comedian on the stage.

BUCK: You would think that security would escort him out. First of all, where was the security? I mean, this guy just walks up on the stage and does this, but you would think that they would at least escort him out of the venue or, you know, escort him to a viewing area outside where this had just occurred. But no, he’s Will Smith! He’s up for — he won — the best actor award. It was King Richard, right, was the movie?

CLAY: Where he’s playing Richard Williams who is the father of the tennis players.

BUCK: Just for those saying, “Buck, don’t… Come on, it’s Hollywood, who cares?” There are members of Congress who are saying, “Yeah, that’s right! Get up there and hit him!” No. That’s not. That’s not right, actually. That’s not how a civilized thing to do. That’s not how we operate in this country.

CLAY: It’s crazy.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: The slap heard round the world. We’re closing out hour number 1 talking about Will Smith slapping Chris Rock last night at the Oscars ’cause he did not like a joke. Nothing happens to Will Smith. Talk about privilege. He goes back, sits in his front-row seat, wins the Oscar for his portrayal of Richard Williams within who’s a father of Venus and Serena Williams, gets up and kind of gives a rambling, tearful speech celebrating his Oscar win. This is what it sounded like.

CLAY: So, Buck, my thing here is, I’m married. I got a wife. Will Smith looked psychologically unstable, and the fact that some people are normalizing a comedian making a joke, which wasn’t even that aggressive of a joke… But if you’ve ever watched any of these award shows, these Hollywood celebrities do need to be ridiculed and mocked. In fact, Ricky Gervais, I think, should be the host for every single award show because he’s actually willing to puncture the narcissism that is so readily apparent in those rooms. I bet you love Ricky Gervais at those things too.

BUCK: Ricky Gervais at the Golden Globes was the most entertaining emcee. I don’t know if there’s ever been a more entertaining emcee at any event on TV that I could think of.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: It was remarkable. But that’s also why… For everybody who’s gonna say, “Oh, but you gotta stand up for your wife.” No one’s saying don’t stand up for your wife. When I say “no one,” my claim here would not be you can’t stand up for your wife. Not at all. Will Smith shouting out stuff? Fine. Will Smith going up to Chris Rock after this thing and having a man-to-man with him, fine.

This is not some guy saying something to your wife at a bar. These are two multimillionaire celebrities who are in a professional setting where one of them is paid to make jokes and is in that context and if you don’t like it, you’re of course allowed to — when I say “allowed,” I think you have every right to say something.

But to those who were saying, “Yay! He did the right thing.” Okay. Will Smith’s a big guy. What if he had gone up there and taken a full-on swing? He open hand slapped him. He catches him off guard. He catches him unaware like that with a closed fist, could have broken his nose right there on stage. Is that…? He could have knocked him out, Clay.

CLAY: And they would have had to stop the performance. Yes.

BUCK: Think about that.

CLAY: And the other thing, Buck, he wouldn’t have done that if it had been a bigger guy. Like, the Rock every now and then hosts performances. If the Rock had come out and made that joke, he ain’t walking up on the stage and open-hand slapping the Rock. And let me also say this. Will Smith is a comedian. Right? So he should understand more than some of the other serious actors who may consider themselves to be complete artists. He understands — or should understand — comedy in a way that others should not. We get a bunch of people who want to weigh in, not surprisingly.

BUCK: Okay, let’s go… I know people are fired up on this. I get it.

CLAY: No doubt. Who should we go to first? Let’s go to Michael in Florida.

CALLER: Hey, guys. Look, I really do like the show; so just take this… It’s coming from a good spot. You’re spending time talking about a guy who wanted exactly what you’re giving him. He knew. You walked on up… You’re right. If it was the Rock or something he wouldn’t have gone up there. But he knew. Even if it was, he knows there’s not gonna be any repercussions, go up there and slap a smaller guy and then no nothing’s gonna happen to him; nobody’s gonna swing back at him. He did it because he wants everybody talking about him and he’s getting exactly what he wanted.

CLAY: See, I disagree. I disagree with this. I understand that argument. I think Will Smith lost his cool, and to me this is the logical extension, Buck, of the world we’ve created where we treat speech as violence and so we allow people to respond violently toward someone who says something mean to you, right? Wasn’t even to him. This is the logical extension of “words are violence,” now a violent response.”

BUCK: He’s about to get the best actor award at the Oscars. I don’t think that he planned out some publicity stunt.

BUCK: This would be like Tom Cruise with a publicity stunt. These people don’t… They have all the publicity they could ever imagine and then some. In Will Smith’s case in particular, he’s sitting in the front row; he’s about to get an Oscar. I think the guy had a bit of a meltdown. I think that’s apparent, and I think that Chris Rock also… Clay, I’ve seen people get punched and hit before.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Chris Rock responded the way people do, like he was in shock. Like, that was… That did not look like acting to me.

CLAY: He thought, I think, if you watch him, Buck… I think what he anticipated was that, who is a comedian, was coming up on stage to do something funny. It was weird that he got up on stage in the first place. By the way, I’d like to hear from some women, like, in the audience. What did you guys think about this?

And also, Buck, there’s so many crazy angles on this. Can you imagine if it had been a white comedian? Can you imagine if it had been a white guy walking up, like you said off air, “Bradley Cooper walks up and smacks Chris Rock because he doesn’t like the joke that he made”? The conversation spirals wildly out of control from there.

Recent Stories

25th Amendment? Biden Blunder Could Trigger Nuclear War

28 Mar 2022

BUCK: We wanted to start with the Biden speech in Warsaw over the weekend in Poland. It was pretty standard. There was nothing about it that would have stuck out to anybody as he spoke on Saturday in Warsaw, until he said off the cuff… Remember he went off script on this one. Here he is saying something that got a lot of eyebrows raised and a lot of people’s anxiety spiked. Play it.

BUCK: “This man,” meaning Putin, Clay, “cannot remain in power.” Among the highest concerns of those of us — and I would put myself in this camp, in this mind-set — who do not want the U.S. dragged into a military conflict. Regime change, that’s something we learned over 20 years now comes with a very high price tag and a lot of risks. The White House and the State Department have walked back these comments. But just a stunning blunder from Joe Biden to essentially say, “Yeah, Putin shouldn’t be running that country anymore. Maybe somebody should do something about it.”

CLAY: Well, this is what I think all of us are afraid of, Buck, which is when Biden goes off prompter and decides to go off script, he is, one, not in control of his own presidency because immediately they tried to clean up that mess that he created, and they even made it clear, I thought, Buck — which is rare, relatively speaking — that he had gone off script. It’s as if the Biden White House is throwing the president — who ostensibly should be making the decisions about what’s going on in his own administration — to the wolves and saying, “Oh, this was all him. This wasn’t us.”

And it’s troubling on a couple of different levels to me when I saw this come out on Saturday. One, we elect the president, and the president should be able to make choices about the direction of his administration. He’s not doing that, Buck. This is, I really believe, a Ron Klain presidency. Ron Klain is the chief of staff in the White House. We know Kamala Harris isn’t some devious mastermind behind the scenes pulling strings to end up as the orchestrating power there. It’s Ron Klain.

So we have elected someone as president of the United States that his own staff does not trust to make his own decisions. And, two, Buck, they talk to us as if we are imbeciles in the way that they immediately responded when they put this statement out and then came back and said effectively, “Oh, you know, this was not… Even though you just heard explicitly what he said, and we just played it, that wasn’t what he was trying to say.” This is scary. I mean, this is scary that they don’t trust him to do anything other than read the prompter — and he’s not, certainly, drafting these speeches. Somebody else is. He is a default non-president already at this point.

BUCK: Well, for so many years now the media’s played this game where all of the Biden blunders have an excuse, ’cause there’s a lot of them.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: All of the things that he says — and whether it’s something that’s offensive or something that is problematic from a policy side of things, something that has greater impact than just saying things that would get a Republican in a whole heap of trouble. They say, “Biden has a stutter,” or they say, “Oh, that’s just old Joe being Joe,” or they come up with all these things. Many of us have been saying Joe Biden’s a buffoon and has been for a very long time, and now he’s a buffoon who is way past the point in his life in terms of energy and mental clarity where he should be in this position.

We’ve seen this playing out now since he took the presidency, and when you have Vladimir Putin and a major war — I mean, this is full scare war we’re talking about and we’re seeing day in and day out in Ukraine — these things matter. If Donald Trump had been the commander-in-chief and in the same set of circumstances had made a comment like that, they would absolutely…

The New York Times, the Washington Post would be calling for the 25th Amendment, the invocation of it. “Oh, my gosh! He’s a clear and present danger. His mental fitness for office puts us at risk of nuclear annihilation.” Everybody listening to this knows that is what they would be saying. With Joe Biden it’s, “Oh, that’s just Joe being Joe.” Meanwhile, there’s ongoing negotiations.

They are elevating negotiations between Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, and Putin, the president of the Russian Federation, for a neutrality status, essentially come up with a deal to stop the bombs and the bullets so that no more people are being killed there. That is the first order of business. What Biden did by saying this is clearly unhelpful to that ultimate goal of let’s get the war to stop.

CLAY: It almost feels like Biden is just rebelling against his own managers, right? And Buck, you know this as someone who has paid attention to politics for a long time. Oftentimes what ends up happening is older people are political officials, men and women, and then almost all of their staff are in their twenties and early thirties. And so there’s a staggering generational divide on its face between the average politician…

I mean, think about it. Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, all of the people in incredibly high levels of political authority right now are old, right, in their seventies or above, and they’re all sorts of interesting conversations we can have about what the impact of that might be. But it felt like to me this was Joe Biden on some level rebelling against his handlers. And I understand he gets wrapped up in the rhetoric that he’s reading, but this is such an egregious failure because the entire speech…

I think he spoke, Buck, for 27 minutes. Nobody talked about anything other than those final — I think it was nine — words that he added at the end which changed the entire tenor, scope, and entire intent of that speech, and it’s just… It’s wild. To your point on the 25th Amendment, we heard about Trump needing to be replaced all the time for the 25th Amendment. Biden is so far beyond — from a mental faculty perspective — where Trump was. He’s a mess.

BUCK: And I think the libs in the media, I think the journos are frustrated with Biden because this was the moment for them. From a domestic political perspective, Ukraine was the moment where they got to shift the narrative away from all of the failures and present Biden — and so much of foreign policy writing and analysis and news reporting is just people just almost wish-casting their perception of, you know, “Joe Biden on the world stage making us proud.” How?

CLAY: Right.

BUCK: By reading speeches and… There’s so much of this that they just get to frame it the way that they want to, and this is why journos generally get very interested in presenting their foreign policy credentials and their version of events. Joe Biden here was supposed to have — and I’m talking about from the mind of the Democrat media apparatus — a moment where he would be the steady hand. He would show everybody how this is his moment.

And I do think there’s frustration, Clay, really frustration among the journos who voted for him — they’re all Democrats, they’re leftists, et cetera — because he’s not actually getting some Biden bump in this moment. You’ve pointed out he’s not Zelensky’s right-hand man in terms of the polling and how it would reflect that Biden’s right there with him and he’s helping fight all this back. Here was Chuck Todd on the Sunday show talking about an NBC News poll. This is where Biden is in approval rating, folks: 40%. Play it.

BUCK: They thought he’d get a bump from his leadership on this issue, Clay, and rallying NATO. The bump has not materialized, because of the bumps Biden has had along the way.

CLAY: Yeah, and to your point, Buck, this was supposed to be Joe Biden’s West Berlin, Ronald Reagan, “Tear down this wall,” Mr. Gorbachev moment. This was supposed to be… This trip was supposed to elevate Biden to make arguments on behalf of American democracy around the world in an iconic fashion. The speech location, if you watched it, was all stagecraft perfect. And when Biden stepped off the stage, all anyone wanted to talk about was his real clear call for regime change.

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

28 Mar 2022

  • New York Post: Will Smith wins Best Actor Oscar for ‘King Richard’ after Chris Rock slap
  • The Sun: Furious Oscars bosses hold secret crisis talks over stripping Will Smith of Best Actor gong after Chris Rock slap
  • Washington Post: An unfunny, unmemorable joke changed Oscars history and Will Smith’s Hollywood story

  • UK Daily Mail: The dramatic moment Hollywood found out about Will Smith’s Oscars punch: Director Taika Waititi gasps while Sarah Paulson frantically Googles as stars who missed out on ceremony hear about Chris Rock attack during Vanity Fair party
  • Daily Wire: ‘At Your Highest Moment, That’s When The Devil Comes For You’: Devout Christian Denzel Washington Comforts Will Smith After He Hits Chris Rock
  • Daily Wire: Squad Member Tweets Support Of Will Smith Slapping Chris Rock, Later Deletes
  • PageSix: Chris Rock and Will Smith’s beef started long before Oscars 2022 outburst
  • New York Post: Will Smith’s wild year: From sex-life revelations to crazy Oscars outburst

  • American Tax Reform: Manchin Wants $1 Trillion Tax Increase
  • HotAir: Biden: You’re just going to love my plan to punish the successful
  • UK Daily Mail: Biden will ask Congress for $32 billion to FUND the police to combat surging crime to try and avoid a Republican bloodbath in the midterms
  • CNBC: President Joe Biden to propose new 20% minimum billionaire tax
  • Daily Wire: Biden, A Self-Admitted ‘Gaffe Machine,’ Eats It Big Time In Europe With Three Major Mistakes
  • NBC: Biden’s job approval falls to lowest level of his presidency amid war and inflation fears
  • Bloomberg: American Consumers Are Starting to Hit Their Breaking Point
  • Bloomberg: A World That’s More Expensive Is Starting to Destroy Demand

  • HotAir: Russia is screwed
  • UK Daily Mail: Oscar ceremony is slammed for holding a ‘moment of silence’ for Ukraine but barely mentioning the invasion – despite launching into multiple woke attacks on Republicans in its first ten minutes
  • Gateway Pundit: “The Words ‘Frail, Doddery and Confused’ Really Do Apply to the Resident of the White House” – Foreign Press After Biden’s Visit to Europe
  • AP: Ukraine pleads for help, says Russia wants to split nation
  • Washington Post: How Biden sparked a global uproar with nine ad-libbed words about Putin

  • AP: Biden lashes at Putin, calls for Western resolve for freedom
  • UK Daily Mail: Biden does a U-turn and DENIES he called for regime change in Russia one day after telling the world ‘butcher’ Putin ‘cannot remain in power’
  • UK Daily Mail: Russian death toll rises to 17,000, Kyiv claims, as Putin’s forces fail to make any ‘significant’ progress due to a ‘lack of momentum and morale’
  • New York Post: Ukraine to probe after videos show alleged Russian POWs shot, abused
  • Breitbart: Ukraine War Causing Food Shortages In Fragile Middle East

  • Federalist: Hunter Biden’s Laptops Are Now An Active National Security Threat
  • New York Post: Biden’s silent as son’s former friend and business partner faces jail, financial ruin – Miranda Devine
  • Wall Street Journal: Prosecutors Advance Tax Probe of Hunter Biden. Grand jury heard witness in February about past drug use, spending habits of president’s son
  • PJ Media: Gosh, There Sure Is a Lot of Hunter Biden News These Days
  • PJ Media: Hunter Biden’s Laptop Contained Defense Department ‘Encryption Keys’

  • Daily Wire:Joe Rogan Blasts False ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Narrative, Tells Teachers ‘That’s Not Your Job’
  • Daily Wire: GOP Senate Candidate Blasts Transgender Swimmer Lia Thomas Competing In Women’s Sports In New Campaign Ad
  • LA Times: California makes history with first openly transgender judge appointed to bench

  • JustTheNews: Turley: Call to impeach Thomas over wife’s texts latest in left’s ‘raging impeachment addiction’
  • JustTheNews: Ketanji Brown Jackson’s claim child pornographers aren’t pedophiles disputed by own experts
  • NBC: Manhattan Lost 6.9% of Its Population in 2021, the Most of Any Major U.S. County
  • New York Post: How the radical left is pushing property owners to the brink
  • Wall Street Journal: E-Scooters Are Having a Moment as Gas Prices Surge. Consumers, sick of paying premium prices at the pumps, increasingly rely on electric scooters to get around
  • HotAir: The states have too much money and they’re going to waste it
  • BizPacReview: Joe Concha says DeSantis ‘winning’ culture wars: ‘A culture warrior, just as Trump was before him’

  • New York Post: Shanghai begins China’s largest COVID-19 lockdown in two years
  • New York Post: Eric Adams needs to expand vaccine exemptions to everyone, not just elites
  • New York Post: Nets’ Kyrie Irving defends vaccine legacy: ‘Standing for freedom’

  • Recent Stories

    Clay on Elon Musk, Socials, and Final Four Cinderellas

    28 Mar 2022

    Clay weighs in on who we might see in the Final Four of the NCAA basketball tournament and Elon Musk’s musings about starting a new social media network to counter the others.

    Recent Stories

    Manchin to Vote for KBJ, But GOP Scored Midterm Points

    25 Mar 2022

    CLAY: Joe Manchin — senator from West Virginia who flirts with the Republicans on a regular basis, the most moderate of all of the Democratic senators — announced this morning that he will be voting for Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nomination on the United States Supreme Court, effectively ending any drama that might surround her ascension to the Supreme Court. So that is basically a done deal, barring some sort of crazy revelation, which it’s hard to imagine what that would entail.

    So that will happen in early April. She will replace Judge Stephen Breyer when the court term ends. So I do think that the Republicans scored a lot of points politically, further elucidating the argument for why Republicans in the midterm makes so much sense. But in terms of what is going to happen to her and her nomination, she is effectively on the Supreme Court with that announcement from Joe Manchin. And now the only drama, to the extent that there’s drama at all, will be to what extent will Republicans support her nomination? How many Republicans will she get? Two? Three? Whatever that number is, it doesn’t really matter.

    BUCK: What’s your number, Clay?

    CLAY: I’m going to go… I think Susan Collins in Maine will end up voting for her. I think there may be a couple of guys who are resigning — “resigning” is the wrong word, who are retiring — from the Senate, who could consider her. I think it’s going to be two. I think there will be two Republicans who end up voting for. What about you?

    CLAY: I’ll go four.

    BUCK: You think four?

    CLAY: Yeah.

    CLAY: Yeah. I do think that the drama is that there will be a lot of attention to how, quote, unquote, bipartisan the voting is. But once Manchin came out and said… We talked about this, Buck. There was maybe a small chance that he could use this as an opportunity to announce, effectively, that he’s becoming a Republican. But these are the consequences — and I think they’re fairly significant — of the run-up elections in Georgia.

    Because Judge Breyer would not have stepped down, if Republicans had control of the Senate. I really don’t believe that he would have, and there wouldn’t have been any sort of massive pressure campaign on him to step down, meaning that you would continue at 6-3, but with an 80-plus-year-old. And, Buck, if you look — positive news — Clarence Thomas came out of the hospital today. He’s been released. He’s back home, hopefully back to being normal and recovering.

    But when you got people over the age of 70, who are on the Supreme Court, as we saw with Antonin Scalia, at any point, that’s how life works. You might have an unexpected death — and that, by the way, could happen in the Senate as well, where you have a lot of older individuals, politicians, who are representing the Republicans and the Democrats. So there are consequences.

    BUCK: I also think that the Republicans are not scared of the Democrats the way that we might have anticipated in terms of the backlash against going after Ketanji Brown Jackson.

    CLAY: Yeah.

    BUCK: I think one of the big takeaways of this whole week of the confirmation hearing is that if the Democrats weren’t in a place where they’re writing think pieces — and they are right now — about how their side is making it too easy — this was in the New York Times, too easy — for a Republicans to just gain ground with independents, to gain ground not just with the Republican base, but with people who will be determining factors in the midterm election and then, of course, going forward to the presidential election after that.

    They’re making it easy, in the sense, that they’re failing on so many levels. Their poll numbers are terrible. Biden looks like an absurdity with each passing day. More like an absurdity with each passing day. So the usual, “Oh, I can’t ask tough questions of this, the first” soon to be, I think, the first “black female Supreme Court justice.” Republicans were not actually scared to ask questions, even at the expense of being called — unfairly — racist by the Democrat media, or sexist. Both, obviously.

    And I think that’s just indicative of they aren’t really worried about what the Democrat Party is at right now. They don’t feel like people who are persuadable will see asking real questions and being willing to push back a bit on what was supposed to just a glide-through process here of a confirmation. GOP is feeling they can actually push a bit, and I think honestly, it was more than I expected to see this week.

    CLAY: Yeah.

    BUCK: It was a number of levels. It was obviously the Marsha Blackburn over the question of, “What is a woman?” Speaking of think pieces, I sent this to you. Do you see now? This is a USA Today think piece, as much as you can call it that, and it’s amazing. “Health and wellness,” under USA Today: “Marsha Blackburn asked Ketanji Brown Jackson to define woman. Science says there’s no simple answer.” (laughing) Okay. Sure.

    CLAY: I’m going to disagree with that opinion piece. I do think you’re right, and I think this is consequential. Once you acknowledge that you’re 100% not going to get honest treatment from the media, I think that’s liberating in some way to say exactly what you think as a politician. Because when you know that the Washington Post editorial board is going to come out and say, “Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson was treated worse than Judge Brett Kavanaugh in the hearings,” there’s no point of even arguing otherwise.

    This is an unpersuadable, dogmatic, propagandist organization that has been created. And I do think that’s an important point, because so many people are so afraid of Twitter, and they’re so afraid and worried about whether they’re liked or not, that it leads to — even force politicians, certainly for high-powered executives and people in positions of power, many people — afraid to say what they actually think, for fear of what the reaction will be.

    And the media has so given up any notions of fair play, that I don’t think Republicans fear what the Washington Post is going to say or what the New York Times is going to say. And in many ways, they recognize that those attacks that they’re going to get for doing their jobs just serves to further buttress the overall support that is out there. That’s why I always say, Buck, “I don’t care if people come after us for things that we say on the show, because the people that attack us, just make people that like us, like us more,” and that is the world we’re in right now.

    BUCK: I also think that the base of the Republican Party… I have a number of people who are friends of mine, who are very much, I think in line with the base and they will often send them to me and say, “What’s the point of the GOP?” That’s the point of frustration. Why do we even do this if they will cave on the following? I feel like this week, the GOP decided, all right. They have the votes, but we know what the Democrats would do.

    They would make this a real confirmation process. They would ask questions that might rattle this soon-to-be Supreme Court nominee and would at least show the public that you do have — as Tom Cotton pointed out, by the way — a far-left activist. That’s actually what he said. Senator Tom Cotton decided that he was just going to say it, Clay. He didn’t care that the media would attack him.

    BUCK: I think it’s good that the American people know something about who the Supreme Court justice is, other than some of the obvious characteristics and background and resume, which is how Biden picked in the first place.

    CLAY: I think also, Buck, the accusations of racism and sexism, don’t land anymore. Because when you brand everything as racist and sexist, it doesn’t work. And let’s be honest. If you really want to talk about direct racism, Joe Biden saying, “I’m picking a black woman,” and specifying during the political campaign that he was going to pick a black woman, thereby eliminating 94%of the American population before it consideration for this particular job, is the very foundation of racism.

    And you’re making a choice entirely based on race, which is in its essence, racism, and the American public disagreed, I believe. And I think this deserved to be argued even more, maybe the Republicans did. That takes away from the legitimacy of Ketanji Brown Jackson’s ultimate appointment to the Supreme Court. Because if Joe Biden had done what Donald Trump had did and put out a list of 20 judges that he was considering and said, “These people are all worthy of the Supreme Court. I’m going to pick someone off of this list,” and then he had picked Ketanji Brown Jackson as one of those 20, people wouldn’t have said, “The only reason he picked her was because she was a woman and she was black.”

    BUCK: Right.

    CLAY: But when you said, “I’m going to put a black woman on,” you automatically undercut the legitimacy of your own choice.

    BUCK: And there’s a reason he did this. It was because that was what was best for Joe Biden, because he was trying to get help from the African-American community, during the primary from Democrat voters, and he made it an explicit quid pro quo essentially, going, “Hey, I’ll do this. Give me more votes,” and also wanted it to make it clear that he is taking credit for this, in advance of doing it, right?

    If you just did it, Clay. Then afterwards, “Well, of course, yeah. I’m the president who appointed the first black female Supreme Court justice. ” But the whole time, it’s been, “Oh, we know we can count on Joe because the moment that he gets the opportunity…” So he wanted to cash on it early. It was all about what was best for Joe Biden was the point. Because if it was what was best for the process, but honestly for Ketanji Brown Jackson, he would have done exactly what she said, lay out who the varsity team is, so to speak and then pick the all-star. Then pick the person who he thinks is the best. Instead, he narrowed it down to — we’ve done the math — 3% of the population overall, not the legal profession.

    CLAY: Yeah, 6% of the overall pongs are black women. And then, Buck, I think it’s 1.8% of attorneys are black women. So meaning — you know, I’m doing the live math on the air, which everybody knows is tough — 98.2% of all attorneys were not considered for this seat, which is pretty wild to think about — and, look, that’s self-evident. Because he only had three or four people to even interview, right? There are only three or four people who were judges that were on the level that could even be considered for the Supreme Court.

    BUCK: Do you agree, by the way? Do you think that affirmative action, as a general… This is not specifically affirmative action. Although, there are obviously discussions as it relates to affirmative action. Do you just it will get struck down —

    CLAY: Yeah. I do.

    BUCK: — in June, the next cycle? I think it’s — which will be a fascinating way that that plays out across the country. Depends on obviously the breadth of the decision. And whether we’re right or not, but that will be interesting.

    CLAY: I think that will. And then there will be an immediate attempt from all these woke corporations and universities to, again, define “affirmative action,” effectively in some way, that doesn’t quite fit the criteria that has been struck down by the Supreme Court. When that was the reality.

    BUCK: I remember when I was an undergrad at Amherst College, the president of the school at the time held a forum. He was properly named. His name was Marx. Oh, yeah. Well-named. So he held a forum on affirmative action and he let the student body know, this was Grutter v. Bollinger, when it looked like the first time around it might — he said, basically, “Don’t worry. Whatever the Supreme Court does, we’re still going to give certain minorities benefits from the application process, and just find a way to cover it up.” He was open. He was pretty open about it at the time.

    CLAY: Yeah. I think that’s likely to occur, no matter what, even if the Supreme Court strikes it down.

    BUCK: It would be fun to be like, “It’s illegal, everybody, to do this stuff.”

    CLAY: Yeah. And, by the way, vast majorities of people of all different races now disagree with the concept of affirmative action as the way it’s being implemented today. So this is not something that is popular in any way. But big picture, as we roll into the weekend, after the biggest, I would say, most significant news coming out of Washington, in terms of political news: Ketanji Brown Jackson is going to be elevated to the Supreme Court early in April. She will be confirmed, and then she will take over when Justice Breyer steps down.

    BUCK: More left-wing than Sotomayor from the bench, or about the same?

    CLAY: Honestly, this is one of those things where she’s been such a stealth candidate, it’s hard to even get a great read on what her opinions are going to be. Certainly, more left-wing than Breyer, who could be at times very conciliatory in terms of the way that he felt his job as a justice existed. Breyer was at least cognizant in some way of business. I don’t think Ketanji Brown Jackson will. I think she won’t be as left wing as Sotomayor. I think she’ll be somewhere to the left of Sotomayor, closer to Kagan.

    BUCK: The old left believed in using the system to achieve power and use power through the system. The new left, just power.

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: Whatever end state you want, whatever situation can get you there, that’s the way it goes. The law is just kind of an impediment.

    Recent Stories

    Kenny Xu on Asian-American Pushback Against the Woke Left

    25 Mar 2022

    CLAY: We are joined now by Kenny Xu. He’s the president of the advocacy group Color Us United, author of An Inconvenient Minority: The Attack on Asian American Excellence and the Fight for Meritocracy. Kenny, I appreciate you joining us. A lot to dive in here, particularly as we’ve been dealing with a new Supreme Court justice being considered by the judiciary committee this week.

    But I want to start with what came out of San Francisco recently, which was the recall by over 70% margins of three different board members, school board members in San Francisco that was to a large extent, it appears, driven by Asian parents who were frustrated over the way that the woke ideology was driving the San Francisco school board.

    Is that, in your mind, Kenny, emblematic of what many Asian parents all over the country believe? Certainly, we heard a lot, I think about in Northern Virginia. I think with Thomas Jefferson High School, with all of the elite high schools in New York City; also, Boston recently. Their major battlegrounds over Asian students getting, quote-unquote, “too many” of the spots inside of the schools, and it seems like it’s really firing up Asian parents. Are you seeing that, in your experience?

    XU: That is how I see it. I’ve interviewed several of the people who actually led that recall and won. This is the highest turnout of Chinese Americans ever in San Francisco for a midyear recall, board recall election. Why is that? What do they mean, that they’ve gone woke? Well, what happens is, there’s this prestigious high school in San Francisco, called Balboa High School that admits on the basis of merit, grades, test scores, that kind of thing.

    They even have some diversity to extend. They decided to change that to a lottery admission system, curving the percentage of Asians by over half. So for many of these Chinese parents, that represents their best opportunity to work hard, and get the merits, to get the reward for their hard work. That’s meritocracy. That’s what we believe in as a country, or what we should believe in. But this ideology that’s now obsessed with diversity, obsessed with “equity” in everything within is now actually limiting opportunity for those who work hard and achieve.

    BUCK: Hey, Kenny, it’s Buck.

    XU: Yeah?

    BUCK: I just want to know… You know, we have a similar situation that plays out almost every year, it feels like, here in New York City, which is my hometown. There’s a number of schools. Stuyvesant is the best-known — Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, Brooklyn Tech — where it’s just pure test score. You take a test. These are public schools, and the highest test scores go to one school, and then the next tranche, and then the next tranche.

    I almost went to one of those public schools, almost went to Stuyvesant, and it always comes up in these social justice fights as, “It’s not fair,” and they say it’s not fair because about 70% plus of Stuyvesant High School in New York is Asian-American.

    XU: Right.

    BUCK: And I want to know, how does the left try to justify the, “It’s not fair that Asian-Americans, including a lot of first-generation immigrants in places like New York City achieve…?” I’m sure there’s similar things playing out in San Francisco. “But there are too many of them achieving.” So we have to discriminate against them, to make things more fair. Like, how does the left square that circle?

    XU: The left is playing a very conniving game with Asian-Americans, which, by the way, I wrote an entire chapter on New York City schools for my book, An Inconvenient Minority. But they’re playing a very conniving game, because they’re suddenly saying that all of the hard work that the Asians put into studying for the test… By the way, Asians study twice as many hours as the average American. They believe education is an opportunity.

    They work really hard. They’re suddenly saying, that is a form of privilege. They’re suddenly saying that the reason why they are overrepresented is because they’re a privileged group, and they’re not a privileged group. The reason why they are able to achieve is because they study their butts off for these tests, and they work really hard in school, and that should be celebrated in this country. But instead, the left denigrates it because it’s overrepresented.

    CLAY: Amen, Kenny, and I think it’s worth mentioning here, merit-based testing — the SAT and the ACT, the rise of the college admissions tests — was because Ivy League schools were discriminating against Jewish students, and the idea was, “We need a meritocracy so everyone can be considered equally,” and now you are hearing, many of these elite institutions are deciding — and certainly the Supreme Court has been examining this as this has worked its way through the circuit courts.

    It appears the Ivy League schools are now discriminating against Asian people because there are too many highly qualified Asian students. Not just the public schools, although that’s been a big topic of discussion as well. It’s that now because Asians are doing so well on the standardized tests, they are talking about doing away with them — which to your point, Kenny, flies directly into the face of the meritocracy argument, because the diversity and inclusion standards are not a perfect representation of the American populace. Asians are overrepresented. We have to do away with testing. This is crazy.

    XU: Right. Right. And I would like to say a very important truth that I need your listeners to listen real closely: Asian-Americans make up a disproportionate of the nation’s high-achieving teenagers. That’s just a fact, and that’s just a fact. So the fact that Harvard would be 43% Asian if they dismantled race in admissions, should not be a surprise to your viewers, to your listeners.

    What is a surprise is that Harvard has been actually keeping a ceiling on Asian-Americans below 20% for the past 30-35 years, and they do this in the name of tolerance and diversity. So in the name of tolerance and diversity, they’re making an exclusive system that’s limiting the most highly qualified applicants in our schools. That’s what’s happening in our country today. We are putting way too much weight in this racial narrative, and we’re diminishing our meritocracy.

    BUCK: Kenny, how do you think we can actually get more Asian-Americans to vote for the not affirmative action-supporting Republican Party?

    XU: (chuckles)

    BUCK: I mean, how do you think we can get more Asian-Americans to come along and realize there’s high achieving. Obviously, higher per capita household income among Asian-Americans than Caucasian Americans. So there’s tremendous success, within the Asian-American community. What has to happen here for the GOP to get more Asian-American votes? Bottom line.

    XU: I think you need to explain clearly the stakes of what’s going on, because you need to tell these Asian-Americans the truth which is it’s not just going to be college admissions. If you let this ideology in the Democrat Party fester, it’s going to take over everything. It’s going to take over college, high school. It’s going to take over your jobs.

    Now at American Express, which we’re fighting right now, they’re giving bonuses to hire for equity, meaning they’re going to start discriminating against whites and Asians for hiring. It will follow you for the rest of your life. You want your child to be rewarded for his hard work, stop supporting race preferences — and, by the way, sign up for our campaign at UnamericanExpress.com.

    CLAY: Kenny, this is fascinating to me, because the Democrat’s entire argument is, “White supremacy is the biggest threat to America,” and then you look at the data — and I believe I’m still correct on this — Asian men, per capita, make more money than any other race, gender ethnic group in America. That is Asian men are the highest earning per capita, on average.

    XU: Uh-huh.

    CLAY: You’ve got, as we just talked about, these individual stories of excellence from Asian people who, by and large, are not test scoring high — as high earning, necessarily, right? These are a lot of first-generation immigrant families, as you’ve said, that are working super hard in schooling and testing.

    XU: Mmm-hmm.

    CLAY: What we’re now seeing, and I want to hear what the Asian response, when you have conversations with people about this is. We’re now hearing, “Well, there may be white supremacy, but the Asian community is not a minority community. They are ‘white adjacent’ because the Asian community is having too much success.”

    XU: (laughing)

    CLAY: And even the concept of white adjacent is ridiculous. Because really, the Asian-American experience in this country right now, does offer what I believe is the ultimate story that American tells, which is you can be rewarded the harder you worked no matter what your race or ethnic group background is. Do Asian people in general, in your experience, buy into this argument — and to Buck’s point, are they increasingly moving towards the Republican Party over this issue?

    XU: Well, there’s a lot of questions there. I’ll start with the last one. Yes, they really moving to Republicans. More Asians voted for Youngkin in 2021 than they have Obama or John Kerry even. But to the question of “white adjacency.” Think about what you’re really saying when you say Asians are “white adjacent.” You’re saying that hard work, studying, test preparation — or preparation in general — discipline, low rates of crime and strong family values are “white,” are “white values.”

    That’s what you’re saying. That’s racist. Black people, Hispanic people, Asian people have proven over and over again that people who adopt those kinds of values — in any case, any culture — are capable of success in this country. So my message to the Asian listeners of your show right now is think carefully about what you are really saying when you are spouting off these talking points.

    CLAY: It’s fascinating how the treatment here is, because it definitely destroys the argument of a white supremacist country to have Asian people dominating in all of these meritocratic universes.

    XU: (laughs)

    CLAY: Right? I mean, it’s amazing.

    XU: This is why the Asian-Americans are “the inconvenient minority.” This is why they’re the inconvenient minority, because how could a white supremacist country let — a truly white supremacist country, as in governed by whites who want whites to advance at the expense of others. Why would they let this group of Asians beat them in college attainment, in average salaries? Asian men have the highest salaries. No. That’s not the kind of country this country is, and we have to debunk this notion right away, and Asian-Americans do.

    BUCK: Kenny, thanks so much.

    CLAY: Fantastic stuff, and we appreciate it.

    Recent Stories

    Lt. Col. Jim Carafano on the State of Play in Ukraine

    25 Mar 2022

    BUCK: War in Ukraine is raging still, if anything getting worse with each passing day. The toll on Ukrainian cities and civilians increasing. A lot of reporting this week on estimated Russian casualties. Some major hits the Russian military has taken. Are they starting to lose ground? Is the Russian war machine meeting opposition that could even turn the tide? We want to talk to our friend, Jim Carafano about this. He is an Army veteran and is a vice president at the Heritage Foundation on defense policy and national security. Jim, great to have you.

    CARAFANO: Hey, thanks for having me on the best show on radio.

    BUCK: Thank you so much, sir. You have excellent taste in radio, among other very, very sound judgment.

    CLAY: Amen.

    BUCK: So, tell us, Jim, I mean, what are you seeing just right now, from the 30,000-foot level. I mean, looking down on the battlefield in Ukraine. How is this going, versus what the West expected, and what Putin was hoping for?

    CARAFANO: Yeah. I think it’s very clear the Russians are not going to reach their maximum strategic objectives. And even if they introduce tactical nuclear chemical weapons, I don’t think that’s in the cards. It’s very clear that as long as the lines of supply are open to the West — which I don’t think the Russians have the capacity to close — and the West keeps funneling resources in, that the Ukrainians keep fighting. 300,000 Ukrainians have gone back into the country in the last couple of days to fight for Ukraine. That’s bigger than the entire invading force that the Russians have. So, we’re going to wind up, I guess, at some point where the — this is going to come to an inconclusive conclusion.

    Now, the fighting will only stop when the Russians and Ukrainians decide. Because they can both fight forever. I mean, as long as Ukraine gets aid from the West, which I assume won’t stop — they can keep the pressure on the Russians. And, of course, the Russians can fight forever. They just go back to Russia, rearm, and come back again. So, the actual fighting will stop, when the two sides (cell drop)…

    We’ll see what that has for the future. But there is no decisive victory, unless something dramatically — you know, never say ever in war. I’ve been in the military for 25 years. Been doing this for 20 years of analysis and written history books. So, I would never be, well, this is what’s going to happen. But that’s the state of play on the ground right now. And I think both sides recognize that. We even saw some recent Russian, announcing to the military, talking about our objectives. And the objectives are not about — no longer about — conquering all of Ukraine. They’re about really consolidating their control on gun buys.

    CLAY: So, Jim, thanks for coming on. We’re a month in, uh, basically. What’s the time frame in your mind? You say it’s hard to project. Certainly, there can be unexpected outcomes. But what’s your time frame in your mind, if you’re looking forward, as to where when there might be a cease-fire, a negotiated settlement? What are we looking at as we move further into the spring, as you analyze the situation on the ground?

    CARAFANO: Well, look, it doesn’t get any easier for the Russians. Because Ukraine is a very flat country. And it gets very wet. And it’s very difficult to operate off-roads. So, you go from essentially freezing, unbearable conditions, to conditions in which armored truck vehicles really can’t maneuver off road. So Putin is publicly saying he wants this wrapped up by May 9th, which is the anniversary of the Russian victory over Germany.

    But I don’t see how things get dramatically better for Putin between now and May 9th. We also have to point out, the one thing the Russians are good at, is killing innocent civilians and destroying their lives and livelihoods, and flattening their communities. A quarter — at least a quarter of the Ukrainian population has already been displaced. That — that number can only grow over time.

    BUCK: Jim… We’re speaking to Jim Carafano, an Army veteran and Heritage Foundation vice president for national security studies. Jim, the Biden administration’s response to this and the overall NATO response to this. This is one of those issues are where we all that matters is what should be done. It shouldn’t be first and foremost about scoring political points or anything like that. What are they doing right? What are they doing wrong? What should change?

    CARAFANO: Well, the number one thing that they’re doing right is they’re continuing to supply the Ukrainians. And as long as they do that with intelligence support and military aid and water and food and medical supplies. And they’re taking care of refugees. As long as they do that, that’s the most important thing, and that’s keeping Ukrainians in the fight. But the question is, where do we go from here?

    And there’s two questions which is, what happens to Ukraine? And, look, wherever that winds up in the end, if Ukraine does not have a demonstrable capability to defend itself in the future, and ward off the Russians, whether that’s part of an alliance or whatever, then this is just the war before the next war. But the other question is for NATO. If NATO doesn’t essentially disarm the Russian threat, which is two things — military and energy — then, again, this is just a crisis before the next crisis.

    Because Putin will rebuild his military and arms, and he’ll be back again. I’m not optimistic on either. So, they’re deploying battle groups. This is a couple hundred people. Putin deployed ten times that number, in the first wave of the attack on Ukraine. These are just speed bumps. If we’re going to — if we’re going to delegitimize a future military threat with Putin, then we have to have enough capability forward deployed in NATO. So, it’s not just like, if you come across this line and kill somebody, we will be at war with you.

    It’s like, everybody that crosses that line, we will kill them. So, that means you have to have really substantial forces to deploy. I’ve not seen that from Biden or anybody else. And, of course, the other thing is energy independence. We all have to have viable, affordable, abundant energy, that doesn’t rely on buying fuel from our adversaries. And I haven’t seen that either. As a matter of fact, Biden doubled down on renewables.

    Anybody that knows anything about renewables knows, one, it’s actually not gonna solve — do anything for the climate — it’s just not. The second thing is it can never deliver a reliable energy grid. The third is that you have to be dramatically subsidizing these things to get power down to a responsible level. So, they’re bad from an economic standpoint. They’re bad from an environmental standpoint. And they’re never going to deliver energy independence. So, when somebody says, “My answer is, we’re going to double down on renewables,” that just tells us that you’re not serious.

    CLAY: Jim, one of the big topics, obviously, is the negotiations that are going on right now and what those might look like. Simultaneously, while those negotiations are going on, there are still reports that Russia is trying to execute Zelensky. I don’t remember in my experience, you may be able to contemplate it, when you have been ostensibly negotiating with a government led by a man that you are publicly trying to assassinate. Can you think of any comparable situation there? And do you believe the Russian attempt to kill Zelensky is still ongoing and as robust as it was reported to be early in the days of this invasion?

    CARAFANO: I mean, I wouldn’t be surprised if they were still trying to assassinate him. Because this is just part of the Russian playbook. And they routinely do these things, because that’s part of their playbook. Look, the reality here is there is no trusted deal with Putin. Putin only respects force. So, he will pay attention to what people do, not what they say. The problem with — particularly with the Biden approach to foreign policy is he wants people to listen to what he says, so he can do as little as possible. So, until we start dealing with Putin in a way that he respects and understands, which is recognizing that there’s force there to prevent him from doing something. No matter what he agrees to. No matter what kind of deals he makes. It’s just a prelude before he stabs you in the back.

    BUCK: And, Jim, where do you see this going? Are both sides… You say that if Ukraine and the forces fighting against Russia there, continue to be supplied, and it looks like that is going to happen. There seems to be, if anything, an increase in the desire of the West, to supply the Ukrainians. Now that we see they’re willing to fight. I think people saw the situation in Afghanistan which was a debacle for the Biden administration in many ways. But also, the unwillingness of the Afghan Army to fight against the Taliban.

    And maybe had a moment of, “Oh, gosh. What’s gonna happen here in Ukraine?” Now that we see that the Ukrainians will fight and are fighting, and standing up to Russia as much as they can. They are getting equipped. They’re getting the arms that we’re sending them. They’re using them to serious effect. Where do you see this going? I mean, does it turn into a negotiated settlement in 30 days, 60 days? Is part of Ukraine in Russia’s hand at the end of this? How does it end?

    CARAFANO: Well, like I said, today, based on what we know right now, this is going to end in a frozen conflict. The actual fighting will subside when both sides think it’s to their advantage to do that. The deal that they cut, it depends. If it’s just a deal that has all kinds of like nonsense, guarantees, processes and stuff. Then what Putin will do is he’ll go back, he’ll rearm, and rebuild. And he’ll come back when he’s ready again. And he’ll take another bite at the apple. And we’ll have another war.

    On the other hand, and you have to remember, no matter how this ends, win, lose or draw, Putin’s military is going to be exhausted. I mean, they’re going need to months, if not years, to rearm and reconstitute before they can go back and start invading other people again. In that time frame, there’s a window where you really can’t threaten anybody militarily.

    And pretty much, NATO can do what it wants to shore up its defenses and its energy. So, the next time Putin comes back, we’re armed against them. So, however this ends, if in that interim period, you don’t accomplish two things. One is, figure out a way that Ukraine can defend itself against a future Russian invasion. And, two, get to energy independence and have sufficient military capabilities forward deployed in NATO to deter Russia in the future. Then we just go back to where we started.

    And people have to remember too, this is all about China. China wants a weakened, divided, and distracted Europe because that helps it isolate America. And so, the Russians are the Chinese stalking horse. So, regardless of how these end, the Chinese are going to help the Russians, get back on their feet so they can pressure Europe again, because that’s good for China. And so, for people who are really concerned about, well China’s the real enemy here — I don’t argue that — the way you diminish China, is you stiff-arm Russia ever having the capability of threatening the West again, with military or with energy. That significantly diminishes their value to China as an ally.

    CLAY: Jim, seven to 15,000 deaths, according to NATO estimates, among Russian forces. 40,000 wounded. You just talked about how Russia is significantly going to take a long time to rebuild. That doesn’t consider all the material — war material — they’ve also lost. Whether it’s planes, whether it’s tanks, whether it’s movable forces, all of these different things. Has Russia rendered itself relatively impotent by, yes, granted they invaded Ukraine, but by being unable to live up to the expectations of what we believe the Russian military was capable of? Is this very much of an empiric victory, regardless of how they try to claim it when a negotiated settlement happens, just based on how they performed?

    CARAFANO: Well, look, Russia can always — remember, you’re an authoritarian regime. You can always rearm and rebuild your military. You know, if you’re smart, you can learn your lessons from last time and improve. Because now they have more combat experience. But we have to remember, regardless of the state of the Russian military — first of all, if you count their tactical nuclear weapons, they have the biggest nuclear arsenal in the universe, that we know of. That’s a problem.

    And despite all the short force in the military, they’ve shown that they’re very good at something. They’re completely ruthless. They’re very good at killing innocent unarmed people, and they do that really well. And they can destroy lives and livelihoods and communities and buildings and infrastructure. So, as long as that military is in being — and as long as Putin is in charge of it. It is a dark shadow over its neighbors in the West.

    And you have to be prepared, to make sure Putin understands, that in the future, anybody that the Russians attack, that those attackers will die and never come back. And that’s the only thing that’s gonna — and the reason why this war started is because Putin didn’t believe that. He recognized something — he expected to win this war in two days. And then he expected everybody to just look at — avert their eyes, and go back to sleepwalking through history.

    We have learned now if Putin could look at the future and knew where he would be today, I’m not sure he would have invaded. If he knew that NATO was — that countries were going to arm the Ukrainians. That the Ukrainians were going to fight. That the economy was going to get hit… If we did the thing nine months ago what we’re doing right now, I don’t think he would have attacked, and I think that’s pretty obvious.

    I think it was obvious nine months ago, actually. Putin respects force. And so, if you do not demonstrate the capability and willingness to stand up to him, he will always come back and try. Has anybody ever seen a bully in a schoolyard? And where they went to the bully and said, please don’t hit me. Who didn’t get immediately smacked in the back of the head when they turned around?

    CLAY: Yeah.

    CARAFANO: And Putin is a bully, it’s just that simple.

    BUCK: Jim, thank you so much for joining us. Jim Carafano of the Heritage Foundation. Talk to you soon, Jim.

    CARAFANO: Hey, thank you so much. Thanks for having me on.

    Recent Stories

    On the 50th Anniversary of The Godfather, C&B Talk Movies and More

    25 Mar 2022

    BUCK: I also just wanted to just get your quick take, Clay, on the 50th anniversary, we are told, of the Godfather.

    CLAY: Yeah, what a movie.

    BUCK: It’s funny, my parents, I think both of them would say without a moment’s hesitation that the two best movies of all time are the Godfather Part One and the Godfather Part Two. I don’t know how many in the audience would share that sentiment right away. For me, it’s Braveheart, but that’s a whole other discussion. You go where on the Godfather? The greatest movie of all time? Top five movies of all time?

    CLAY: I think it’s phenomenal. I love your Braveheart take. I think it partly, when you classify… First of all, 50 years. It’s amazing that it’s been 50 years since that movie was made. I think partly it factors in, are you talking about a movie that you watch and you recognize as incredible? Because Citizen Kane, for instance. I can watch Citizen Kane and recognize, “My God, this thing is incredible.”

    BUCK: I’m such a savage. I fell asleep watching Citizen Kane.

    CLAY: Oh, Citizen Kane I think is incredible.

    BUCK: I can’t tell a lie.

    CLAY: But I wouldn’t want to watch Citizen Kane every day, right? So there’s a difference between a movie that you recognize as phenomenal and a movie that you would watch every time it’s on. So, for me, I would rather rank movies that I would watch every time they’re on, and balance that out with elite-level moviedom, for a lack of a better way to describe it.

    BUCK: What is the movie you’ve rewatched the most of all time?

    CLAY: Probably… Well, because my kids now factor in, so we have watched —

    BUCK: No. It doesn’t count with the kids. No cartoons or anything like that.

    CLAY: It doesn’t count with the kids? I’ve watched probably The Christmas Story because it’s on every holiday season. Elf. A lot of those holiday movies. The one that I would say, if you told me, “Hey, if you could only watch one more movie, what movie would you watch?” I probably would go with Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. I think that might be —

    BUCK: That’s solid. I’d have to say the first Ghostbusters, first Ghostbusters.

    CLAY: First Ghostbusters is amazing. You watched the Ghostbusters Afterlife that I told you wasn’t too bad.

    BUCK: It was like a solid gentleman’s B-plus-ish.

    CLAY: Way better than the girl Ghostbusters.

    BUCK: Which was an F. Yes.

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: Yeah. So it was like a watchable. I kind of enjoyed it. By the way, I did a quick poll here of our NYC producers, Greg, Ali, Mike, they all said Godfather, top five of all time.

    CLAY: Yeah.

    BUCK: They put it top five.

    CLAY: I think it’s top five. The movie that I would watch, if I only had to watch one, I think Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is absolutely phenomenal.

    BUCK: Wait. Better than Raiders of the Lost Ark, Travis? Really?

    CLAY: Way better than Raiders of the Lost Ark.

    BUCK: Wow, I don’t know.

    CLAY: You’ve gotta go back and watch it again. I watched Raiders of the Lost Ark… It’s the movie I saw eight times in the theater, when I was a little kid. You know, they used to leave movies on for like six months back in the day. Remember that? When they had a successful movie. You could go again and again and again all through the summer and on into the fall. But I would say, The Last Crusade. The movies I’ve watched the most honestly, are probably the Star Wars movies. Because I’ve got to watch them with the kids. The Back to the Futures. The Goonies of the world are phenomenal.

    BUCK: Gladiator is amazing.

    CLAY: Oh, Gladiator is one of… Is Gladiator 20 years?

    BUCK: It came out in 2000. It won Best Picture in 2000.

    CLAY: Yeah. So in the last 20 years, I would say Gladiator is probably one of the best movies I’ve seen, just in terms of how well it’s been done.

    BUCK: I also think that Russell Crowe was fantastic in Master and Commander, which —

    CLAY: Yeah. Good movie.

    BUCK: — is an under the radar war movie. There’s nothing like that from the great age of ships. There’s no movie quite as good as Master and Commander.

    CLAY: Russell Crowe had a run there, of like six or seven years, because A Beautiful Mind was also a phenomenal movie.

    BUCK: Yeah, he got to the point where he thought he could throw a telephone at somebody’s head without consequence in New York City. It turned out that wasn’t true.

    CLAY: He also got so bad at movies that he decided he wanted to do music. He decided he wanted to have a music career. I feel like some of those guys get bored if they’re so talented in acting, and they decide they want to do something else. It might be direct. It might be produce.

    BUCK: Shaq had a hip hop career for a while. Now, that’s sports. But he clearly wanted to expand his talents beyond.

    CLAY: You know the most famous Shaq song ever? This isn’t the real title. “My Biological Didn’t Bother.” It was about how his biological father. That was the title of the song.

    BUCK: Are you serious? I’ve never heard of that.

    CLAY: Yeah. Shaq was raised by his stepfather, because his biological didn’t bother. He also had an album.

    BUCK: He was also, I believe, in Kazaam.

    CLAY: That’s right.

    BUCK: He had a movie career as well.

    CLAY: Multi-platform.

    BUCK: He’s a multi-platform threat you could say.

    CLAY: Who is the best multi-platform threat in America today?

    BUCK: Oh, my gosh.

    CLAY: I’ll give you my answer. I know my answer and you can think about it. I’ve got two. Justin Timberlake. Jamie Foxx. Two most talented people in terms of being able to do everything. Music, acting.

    BUCK: Agreed. Wanted to dislike Justin Timberlake, because of the whole Jessica Biel situation, but he’s also good in the movies.

    CLAY: (laughing) The Social Network, he’s phenomenal in. He’s really, really good. And Jamie Foxx is obviously incredible as an actor and a performer.

    BUCK: He’s good at stand-up too. Obviously, I’m not about to be a professional athlete anytime soon. But of the communications, I think I’d be better off trying to be an actor, Clay, than trying to do comedy. Full-on stand-up comedy is really hard.

    CLAY: Oh, I would way rather do stand-up than act. I can’t act.

    BUCK: I’m sorry. I asked Clay about movies, and we just started talking.

    Recent Stories