×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Clay Crushes Disney CEO For Woke Lunacy

31 Mar 2022

Sean Hannity welcomed Clay and Tammy Bruce on to discuss the lunacy unfolding in Disney’s corporate suits, where they’ve decided they need to push sexually explicit material to children as young as 5. The company pushed back against Gov. Ron DeSantis for signing the Parental Rights in Education Bill into law, lying that it’s called “don’t say gay.”

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

WaPo, CNN Join the Hunter Biden Story in Progress

30 Mar 2022

CLAY: We want to talk now about some of this Hunter Biden story. So for those of you out there who haven’t read it yet, the Washington Post just before we came on air — about an hour before we came on air — suddenly comes out with a story and says (summarized), “Oh, we validated, confirmed that the Hunter Biden laptop emails are real,” and they now have a big story up about the millions of dollars that Hunter Biden got from Chinese interests, essentially selling access to his family.

And CNN yesterday, out of basically nowhere, Buck — I mean, because ABC, NBC, and CBS had not even covered Hunter Biden at all in 259 days — suddenly they get around to covering it. A CNN senior legal analyst, she says, “Well, you know, there’s a potentially really serious federal crimes at play here.” Thank you! Been saying it for 18 months or more. Listen to the CNN legal analyst yesterday.

BUCK: So let’s just understand a few things, and, Mr. Travis, there’s a certain momentum right now.

CLAY: Good vibes. If we were setting odds, the numbers would be moving in my direction.

BUCK: It’s never been a question, in my mind, of whether Hunter broke the law. The guy had to pay a million dollars in owed taxes, for example, right in and it’s not ’cause he “made a mistake.” It’s not ’cause he wrote off a couple office chairs or something when he wasn’t supposed to. He was hiding income from the IRS.

I mean, hiding large sums of money from the IRS is actually the one thing that they do tend to prosecute people for. You know, “What do you mean? I didn’t make a million dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian gas company or whatever,” that’s where they’re gonna get people. But up to this point we know there are different rules for Democrats, different rules for Republicans.

Whenever there’s a politically charged moment that prosecutors can weigh in on, Democrats get more than the benefit of the doubt. They get special treatment. Hillary Clinton’s a great example. There are countless others that we can talk about. Has it shifted? And this is the part of it that would be — ’cause I still believe that they would make it go away for Hunter Biden, to make it necessary for Joe Biden, and they care enough about Joe Biden’s political future.

He’s already the president. So this isn’t going to affect him in office. He stays in office. But does this wound him for the next go round, and is that why they’re willing…? We’re gonna have to dive into this. This is a big question with all this. Plus, I want to tell everybody about the China connection here to all this.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: The Washington Post goes into some detail. Turns out Hunter Biden did get millions of dollars from China, everybody. Affirmed, confirmed reality here. We’ll get into this in just a moment. There’s a lot, a lot going on.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

BUCK: Remember back when Trump was talking about this issue with the Bidens getting money from people, Hunter Biden getting money? If you even breathed a word of corruption around… Let’s think about this, folks: Hunter Biden, somebody whose adult choices, unfortunately, have become a case study in what not to do on a whole variety of fronts.

But if you brought this up, if you said the laptop was real, if you said Hunter was getting payouts from foreign governments — shady and even optional foreign governments in the case of, say, China — you were told to shut up, you were told that you were a liar, you were told you were a spicier theorist, and this is by the most supposedly reputed journalists.

Just so you understand, we have warring media propaganda machines going on all the time, all right? This notion of neutral journalism is a farce. Nobody should be speaking about it with a straight face. But here you have the would explain finally coming out and admitting one thing, Clay. There’s really I think a two-step process here.

One is they — the Washington Post, CNN, the New York Times, the Democrat Party, and everybody who’s in that mix — lied to the American people in the most obvious and cynical fashion right before an election because they wanted senile Joe Biden, who’s clearly not up for the job, to be the next president because they’re obsessed with power and they don’t care what it actually meant they had to do.

Okay. So start with that. They lied. That is now a fact. There is no getting around this. CNN lied. The New York Times lied, the Washington Post. Twitter with its ban of this story. Remember, there’s no apology to the New York Post, there’s no apology that’s been out there. So we have established that. You’ve all been lied to. Now, I know you know you were lied to.

That’s why you’re listening to this show, because we tell you the truth. But let’s just be clear that’s now on the record. Now, Clay, the interesting part about this I think the next step is, what are the details here? And what really has occurred? What’s really happened when it comes to Hunter Biden? That takes us to this Washington Post story which is just confirming what a lot of has already been said by conservative analysts, pundits, reporters.

So here’s how they write this piece: “Inside Hunter Biden’s Multimillion-Dollar Deals with a Chinese Energy Company — A Washington Post review confirms key details and offers new documentation of Biden family interactions with Chinese executives,” and then it goes into it. I’ll just give you one thing here.

“Over the course of 14 months, the Chinese energy conglomerate [CEFC] and its executives paid $4.8 million to entities controlled by Hunter Biden and his uncle, according to government records, court documents and newly disclosed bank statements, as well as emails contained on a copy of a laptop hard drive that purportedly,” they say, “once belonged to Hunter Biden.” Clay, what Trump was saying about the Biden family, what the right was saying about the Biden family, it was all true.

CLAY: It was all true. The Bidens are what the fever’s dream version of the Trump family allegations were out there over the last five years. Over $4 million, almost $5 million. What is I think paramount now that all of you need to be thinking about, “Why now? Why, after 18 months?” Certainly, they covered this up in October when the New York Post story came out because they wanted Joe Biden to be elected.

Why now are they covering it? I think there’s a couple of things worth discussing, Buck. First of all, I believe there are going to be charges brought against Hunter Biden, and some people think that’s crazy. Obviously our steak bet is over it. But the reason why I think there are gonna be charges brought is, one, I agree with you that Hunter Biden has committed several felonies.

But I don’t think this is gonna be at the discretion of the district attorneys, of the U.S. attorneys, of anybody who’s investigating. They’re in front of the grand jury right now. I think they’re going to claim that it is not their choice to bring charges. They’re going to put it in front of the grand jury and let garage decide whether charges are brought so they can argue, “Hey, this is not a political decision.

“We followed protocol, and this is what the grand jury decided,” and I think based on all the evidence out there, it’s hard to believe, just based off what we’ve seen, that at a minimum Hunter Biden hasn’t committed tax fraud. I mean, we know that he paid a million dollars back. And that’s fine. It’s great to pay your tax bills when they’re owed.

But it doesn’t mean you didn’t commit the crime when it occurred of not having paid. Why would he not have paid, Buck? I think because he knew that a lot of the money that he was getting from these international corporations in Ukraine and in China was gonna look really, really bad. And he was trying to not provide notice in his tax return of all the money and where it was coming from.

BUCK: And can we just understand, everyone, why do you pay $500,000 for a Hunter Biden finger painting, for example? The fact that this is even going on — and it is, or 50 grand or whatever the payments are —

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: — just goes to show you this is another version of what the Clintons did, which is find ways to create a fig leaf of legality for the buying of access to U.S. government decision-makers and the Rol-O-Dexes of the most powerful Democrat officials in the country and therefore in the world. That’s what this is really all about. Burisma was paying off Hunter Biden.

First of all, they were doing that. We’re talking about China now. This was in 2017. Burisma was doing it when his dad was running U.S. foreign policy in Ukraine, okay? This is clearly corrupt. If you go back and read about the Bob McDonnell prosecution brought by the Feds in Virginia who was the governor of Virginia at the time, not only did they want to send him to prison…

He never took a single official act; they never claimed he did. It just looked bad, they said, that he was taking gifts. It was unseemly. As he was governor, he was taking gifts. It looked corrupt. Clay, they wanted to send his wife to prison for two years. She wasn’t even an official. That’s how the Democrats play the game. I believe the Supreme Court actually had overturn one of the charges against McDonnell because it was so broad and there was overreach.

But, anyway, they create these schemes for peddling access. Hillary and Bill Clinton made tens of millions of dollars giving speeches, everybody? No, of course not. Everybody knew Hillary was running for president, everyone knew. That’s why all the donations to the Clinton Foundation dried up after Hillary lost the 2016 election, which I said, by the way, was gonna happen on CNN.

They were all, “Oh, (mewling), you don’t know anything.” Yeah, of course. And it turned out that that was obvious. And now here with Hunter Biden, you had Burisma when his dad was vice president. But even when Biden is not technically in office, the whole point of this is to give access. Hunter Biden was gonna provide access to Democrat Party decision makers that he knew through his dad, and they view it as a good investment to throw money at this ne’er-do-well because he might be able to get policy in the U.S. to go in their direction — and we’re talking about China here, folks.

CLAY: They know they can talk to his dad. That’s what you’re paying for. You’re paying for the access.

BUCK: Yeah. That’s right.

CLAY: And, by the way, it moved even beyond this because, remember, the emails reflect “10% for The Big Guy.” So I think what happened was when Trump won in ’16, Joe Biden thought his political career was over. I don’t think he ever really thought, “Hey, I’m gonna run again in 2020.” He knew how old he was, and he decided to shift to, “Let’s make as much money as we can while we still can. ”

And that is, to me, where we get Joe Biden complicity. But the reason why that I believe that all of this is suddenly coming out now… Remember, Buck, CBS, NBC, and ABC, big newscasts. Your mom and your dad, grandma and grandpa may still watch the evening news on those big networks. They didn’t mention Hunter Biden for over 260 straight days!

I’m really genuinely curious in the wake of the New York Times and in the wake now of this Washington Post and CNN coverage whether your nightly newscast — that 30 minutes used to be the Walter Cronkite of the world, encapsulation of everything that’s going on in the entire country and around the world — are they finally going to cover it?

If they do — and I think there’s probably a good chance that they’re going to have to cover it now — what it is emblematic of in my opinion is Democrats have realized that Joe Biden is done. They are effectively throwing him off the boat and letting him flounder in the ocean on his own. It’s time to move on. Maybe it’s to Hillary. Maybe it’s to Kamala. It’s going to be to an open primary. I think they’re telling Joe Biden, “We don’t have your back anymore. You’re dead to us.”

BUCK: So let me ask you, southern Nostradamus here, the Nashville Nostradamus.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: If there are criminal charges brought — which I still think will not happen. I think there will be a deferred prosecution agreement that he will not actually face a criminal trial or have to take a plea agreement for criminal charges. But I’m gonna say, I’m saving up money just in case.

CLAY: Yes. Yes.

BUCK: I’m creating a little steak fund.

Recent Stories

Peter Pansexual: Disney Prez Pledges 50% Gay Characters

30 Mar 2022

CLAY: Buck, I feel like Disney completely and totally lost its mind over the bill that had been signed in Florida to allow kindergarteners, first graders, second graders, and third graders not to be instructed about sex-related issues. And Disney we talked about earlier this week came out with a statement slamming the state of Florida and saying they were gonna try to repeal this bill, and Ron DeSantis obviously fired back about that yesterday.

But I want to play some of these clips from high-ranking Disney executives, and I want everyone out there to think about this. The foremost company in the world when it comes to entertaining children is in an uproar over a bill that does not allow kindergarteners, first graders, second graders, or third graders to be taught about sex-related issues.

By the way, the vast majority of American parents agree with this Florida bill. But, Buck, it really kind of gets summed up here. Disney has banned… For those of you — and I grew up going to Disney World. This is what my parents loved to do. We would stay in the campground at Fort Wilderness. For anybody out there who is familiar with Disney World, that was where we went on our family vacations.

We would stay in the campground. We had an amazing time. As part of many of their celebrations, they often would say, “Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls,” in an effort to speak to everyone who was inside of the park. These insane people at Disney have decided that using the words “ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls” is not gender inclusive enough.

And so they have banned the usage of “ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls” inside of the park, and I want to play some of this for you. First of all, here is Ron DeSantis, who we had dinner with last night, what he said about what Disney’s response to this bill has been. Listen.

BUCK: Clay, could we just review what’s happened in the last couple of weeks that’s taken us to this point, just so everyone’s clear?

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: LGBTQIA+ activists.

CLAY: Good job on that, by the way.

BUCK: Thank you.

CLAY: I don’t think I could have nailed that.

BUCK: That’s the real acronym, okay? LGBTQIA+, activists, decided to rename a bill that is very clear in its language about not having kindergarten through third grade students instructed in gender identity and sexuality and matters that pertain to that. That is what it says. The activists renamed it the “don’t say gay” bill.

For them, all of a sudden not teaching kindergarteners about gender identity and sex — let’s just be honest: about sex and procreation and all these things — that is an assault, according to the activists, on the LGBTQIA+ community. And then we said, “Hold on a second. It’s one thing that Disney stands up and says they’re going to virtue signal on this and the Disney executives,” but this went… and hat tip Chris Rufo who finds so much this have stuff out there.

The training about critical race theory and the training in gender theory, gender identity at corporations, and if you go against this stuff, just so everybody understands — I mean, if you’re a Disney employee, let’s say, and you speak out against this — they’ll call you a bigot. They’ll probably fire you, right? So this is the world we are living in now.

Here is Disney president Karey Burke, who is saying that she wants — now, she’s the president of content, Clay; she gets to determine what gets made at Disney as a movie, as a TV show, saying that she wants — more LGBTQIA+ characters. Up to 50% in the next year, lead characters must be from that community. Play clip one.

BUCK: So she’s upset, Clay… I mean, think about this. She’s upset that there aren’t enough… I remember when using the Q-word was not allowed. But now it’s a word that we do use ’cause it’s in the acronym. That’s the Q in the LGBTQIA+. So she says, “We don’t have enough queer leads.” That’s one thing. This is for Disney content, folks — just remember that — for your kids.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: This is cartoons for your kids to watch, mostly — and on the other end, notice she starts out and says she’s “the parent of two queer children,” I believe she says a “transgender and pansexual child.” Now, maybe she means adults children. That’s not clear, to be fair to what she says. How many people listening to this said, “Pansexual?”

CLAY: I have no idea. I know what a transgender person is, and I do think it’s important. I would like to know how old her kids are because when she says “kids,” some people talk about their kids and they’re 30, you know, like ’cause they’re still their kids. What is a pansexual? I’m not even kidding, Buck. I have no idea what a pansexual is.

BUCK: So I got… I’m getting attacked by the blue-haired, masked-in-their-Twitter-photos mafia of the left on this issue, ’cause I just pointed out basically nobody knows what this is. It’s a term that has almost never been used. They’ll say it goes back to psychiatry in the early/mid-twentieth century. Pansexual as opposed to bisexual. Bisexual is pretty straightforward, somebody who’s attracted to men and women.

CLAY: Like guys and women still exist.

BUCK: Well, see, here’s the thing. They’ve responded “pansexual” means irrespective of whether somebody actually is “gender conforming,” i.e., if someone is not actually male or female somehow, you are still attracted to that person; you are attracted to all people irrespective of where they fall on the dozens of gender and pronoun options that are out there now.

So it’s basically saying, “I’m an all-of-the-above approach, including nongender conforming people.” Now, to those listening to this saying, “Hold on a second. There really are…” I mean, it’s one thing to say you can be trans, right, go from one gender to the other. But there really are actually two genders. There’s male; there’s female.

This is a function of biology. Understand that not only are they fighting on this or arguing, debating on this, this is the president of content at Disney, Clay, saying, “We need to teach this stuff through our content to your children.” That is what the senior person in charge of Disney is saying to everyone across America who’s hearing this right now.

CLAY: I saw a quote from… I’m not sure who said it, but I know that there are a lot of Disney people. And let’s be clear, by the way. There are a lot of Disney employees who roundly reject — probably the majority of them, maybe even the vast majority of them — all of this. Right? The idea that Disney needs to be a hyperpolitical organization, that the president of Disney needs to be saying that her pansexual children need to be reflected in cartoons that your kids are watching.

This is, by the way, crazy, and Walt Disney himself would be rolling over in his grave if he saw what his company was coming to represent now, and this is… I gotta give credit. We had Jordan Peterson on a while ago. But what he said and has continued to say for years has been so prescient, because we’ve got a lot of people who own businesses.

When you let these “diversity and inclusion” imbeciles into your company with the idea being that they are going to strengthen your company, you don’t understand that you are effectively… This is the Trojan War. You are letting them into your company, and they are going to destroy it, and they are going to destroy you. This is what’s happening inside of Disney. This is the Trojan War. They are saying, “Hey, you’ve gotta have more diversity and inclusion.”

BUCK: The Trojan Horse in the Trojan War.

CLAY: Yes. They are getting inside of the companies, and they are destroying them from the inside. That’s what’s happening to Disney right now.

BUCK: Their goal, the D&I, Diversity and Inclusion training and all this — and this ideology of the left that’s being infused through corporations like Disney and Google and Facebook and Netflix —

CLAY: Everywhere.

BUCK: — and Goldman Sachs, by the way —

CLAY: Everywhere.

BUCK: — and Cravath! That’s a top law firm in New York, pretty famous law firm for the legal folks out there.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: You know, these places are also the “announce their pronouns” places now in emails and in meetings. You know, “My name is John. My pronouns are he/him.” This is what’s going on all over the place. They bring this in under the rubric of inclusiveness and everyone feeling comfortable and everyone being okay.

And then when you say, “Hold on. I actually don’t think that my toddler should be watching a movie that is delving into or cartoon that’s delving into the pansexuality of a character. I don’t think they’re ready for that,” you’re a bigot. Maybe you should be fired! Maybe you should lose your job and be run out of society because you’re so hateful.

That is their mentality. They’re not looking to educate people and bring other people in and have a… It’s not about a conversation. It’s a lecture. And that’s what Ron DeSantis from Florida has understood here from the beginning of this fight. They’re not looking to have everyone should be treated with dignity and decency. We’re nice guys, Clay. We advocate for everybody to be nice and fair and kind to people. This is about, though, what is true, and it’s about what’s true for your kids. It’s about what’s true for your children.

CLAY: We need to play a couple more of these clips because I think parents out there are going forward these to be jaw dropping. And, by the way, this is the president of Disney.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: We’re not talking about some random, low-level employee who’s protesting in Disney and making her own or his own videos. We’re talking about somebody who decides what shows are made at Disney.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

BUCK: Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, thank you for listening to the Clay and Buck show. You won’t hear that first part at Disney anymore, though — that’s for sure — because they’ve told us that you will no longer hear that because it is triggering; it is “gender normative.” Remember, you have to learn a whole new language, never mind a whole new sense of sexual attraction, gender identity and all these things, or else you’re a bigot.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: They don’t want to teach. They’re not trying to teach you. They’re saying, “This is the new reality. Shut up and celebrate it or else,” and here, for example, is another senior Walt Disney Corp. official saying why they got rid of “ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls” or whatever the official Disney phrase is. Am I getting it right?

CLAY: “Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls.” They’ve been doing it before big events at Disney for 50 years, probably, as long as Disneyland and Disney World have existed. They first did away with “ladies and gentlemen” because that was not inclusive enough.

BUCK: Now it has to be “Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, plus non-cisgender, nongender, binary conforming, heteronormative, and nonheteronormative, pansexual, open, and transgender-affirming individuals, thanks for coming to Disney World.” Here’s the lady, actually… Uh-oh! I think I said “lady.”

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: Clay, I’m making a big assumption there, and I am really seriously I’m putting here into a gender box, gender normative. Sorry. I should… I’m gonna put a dollar into the gender-normative jar. Here we go. Play the clip, please.

CLAY: I really don’t know at this point, Buck, what are you called if you don’t identify as a man or a woman? Are you allowed to be an amorphous being somewhere in between? I mean this honestly, because even the transgender universe, that is about acknowledging that you’re a man or a woman, right? You may feel like you’re a man, but you’re a woman or whatever.

I think all this stuff is crazy. But are there now lots of people that are refusing to say whether they are a man or a woman, like they’re in some amorphous nether region between the two or outside of the two? Like, who are the people that are not…? Like, what percentage of Americans or global citizens are not willing to acknowledge that they are a man or a woman? Like, they’re somewhere else in between?

BUCK: I don’t know, Clay, but there are a lot of people with blue hair on Twitter who voted for Biden who are literally shaking right now.

CLAY: (chuckles) By the way, did you see…? Speaking of literally shaking, did you see that Amy Schumer is still unable to recover from the Will Smith slap?

BUCK: She’s the real victim, Clay.

CLAY: She is the real victim. I don’t know whether she’s a man or a woman. She may not know.

Recent Stories

The Woke Ideology Takes Charge of Corporate America

30 Mar 2022

CLAY: We’re talking about — because I think this is a big cultural moment here — Disney and many of its top employees losing their minds and making all sorts of outlandish decisions to try to bow down to the woke universe. And, by the way, they’re doing this while not holding any of the rest of the world to the standards of basic human rights because, remember, they filmed the Mulan movie and thanked the Xinjiang Province people who were actually committing genocide against the Uyghur population.

So you bow down to China in China and don’t have anything at all to say for their direct human rights violations, but you then go crazy woke here in this country. Now, Karey Burke is a Disney president, said she has a “transgender and a pansexual child.” She graduated, by the way, from UCLA in 1988 so her kids at the utmost are probably in their twenties, but she has five of them, so who knows how old her kids are.

She also is now making aggressive, ridiculous wild comments. This is from a company Zoom. Here is a second cut where she says that — effective basically immediately — all of Disney’s characters are going to be LGBTQ… I can’t even keep up with all the different letters, but LGBTQIA+. Is that right? Did I get it right?

BUCK: Pretty good there, Mr. Travis.

CLAY: Listen to this. Listen to this comment that she made also in the same clip that has gone viral.

BUCK: She’s crying. The president of content entertainment at the Walt Disney company is crying because of the insufficient number of Disney stories that are focusing on — as the primary story and the primary character — members of the LGBTQIA+ community. I would also like to put out an official protest. I’ve just learned about pansexuality today, after she said it. I don’t see a P in the LGBTQIA+ acronym. So I think there’s a little bit of anti-pansexual bigotry out there right now.

CLAY: I’m feeling that vibe. I’m feeling that vibe. That phrase is not inclusive enough to me.

BUCK: It’s not in there, and I think we have to ask why, Clay. Oh, there’s a plus. The pansexual folks only get a plus?

CLAY: That’s a good point.

BUCK: That’s not right.

CLAY: Feels a little discriminatory.

BUCK: It does. But let’s look at what’s really going on here. What started all of this? You and I, we had dinner with Governor DeSantis last night. He’s on the forefront of so many of the battles against the woke left and against the mask madness. Oh, we got some Fauci stuff to share with you later on in the show too, folks.

He’s back. We knew he would be. They found him in the couch cushions over at the MSNBC greenroom. They dusted him off. Here he is. But I gotta tell you, Clay, what we all see here is there was a huge outrage — wasn’t just a manufactured outrage — at the idea on the activist left that you cannot…

You cannot indoctrinate children from kindergarten to third grade in the state of Florida as a function of law without having some liability. It’s completely enraging to them, which means that they obviously want to at least have that option or that ability, which raises a lot of questions.

CLAY: No doubt. And I’m just still focused on the craziness of “ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls” being offensive. Like, to me that crystallizes Disney and the radical departure and genuflection at the altar of the woke that this represents because what percentage, Buck, of the American population is offended by a greeting that says, “ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls”?

I don’t even understand how someone could be offended by that. Biology is real. Men and women and the distinctions between men and women and real. You can’t just decide that you don’t acknowledge basic biology. I can’t just start walking around and say, “You know what? I’m anti-gravity. I think gravity sucks.” Okay. Gravity’s real. I can’t just walk around, Buck, and say, “Hey, you know what? I think it sucks that water freezes eight 32 degrees.

“F water freezing at 32 degrees! I’m anti-ice.” Well, this doesn’t make any sense to me at all, and then you acknowledge these people? It’s like, hey, we’re outside walking around; there’s a temperature. “I refuse to acknowledge temperature exists.” Like, what are…? I don’t understand. The Party of Science is fundamentally repudiating the most basic essence of life, which is biology.

BUCK: This is why we have to remind ourselves in all this of two things. First of all — and remember this — the left, everybody, chose this fight. The left decided that this is a battle that they want to win. They forced this on all the rest of us. This is not — ’cause now what they do is, “Oh, why you so obsessed with gender identity and ideology?” Excuse me?

You’re the ones, meaning the leftist activists — and, look, this is the Democrat Party. You will not see a mainstream Democrat politician condemn biological males in female sports right now. You will not see it. I mean maybe with the exception of Joe Manchin but he’s basically Republican. But you will not see people. You will not see woke Democrats condemn this, in office.

I’m not even just talking about in the media. You will not see them speak obvious truths here, and so that’s one part of this. They’ve picked the fight. And the other is, look at the power they seek to have. To Clay’s point about biology is real; they’re repudiating and rejecting observable science. Think of the power that they seek to have over all of us now.

“Reject what your eyes and ears and experience and history tell you or else you’re a bad person and we will destroy you.” You think they’re just gonna do that on gender identity issues as a function of policy and culture? Absolutely not. If they can force you to say things that you know are untrue on this, they can force you to say things that you know are untrue on whatever topic they want because this is about brute culture and in the case of the Democrat Party state force in clear defiance of reason and observable fact. That’s what they’re doing.

CLAY: It’s scary, Buck, how quickly we’re destroying the tenets of basic society and replacing them with nothing. And this may seem for some people, “Oh, this is just…” To me, this is a metaphor of a rejection of basic fact and science, and this is a major entertainment corporation that has effectively allowed itself to be taken hostage by the woke ideology. There’s no other way to describe it.

BUCK: I think it’s run by the woke ideology now. I think we’ve kind of… To your point, Clay, this is about the Trojan horse — which is absolutely true — it started really 10 or 15 years ago with the infiltration of this D&I and the woke in all of its fashions in the H.R. department, the corporate training departments. Now the CEOs and the presidents of content, et cetera — whether they believe it or not is tough to know.

Although, I mean, this president at Disney who starts out talking about a pansexual and transsexual. By the way, what are the chances that somebody who has this ideology happens to have a child of any age who also fits into that ideology and is there some interesting correlation there? Have you ever noticed this?

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Very woke leftists with overwhelmingly more likely to have, it seems, a child who identifies in this capacity, and I think that’s… You know, again, the pansexual issue has obviously gotten a lot of attention. This is Disney’s president saying it. What…? I think we should take this to the audience a little bit. I just want to remind everybody, ’cause they’re running around saying everyone who supports the Florida law, which is how this whole argument got started, is a bigot.

Fifty-two percent of Democrats in the state of Florida support the Parental Rights in Education bill. A huge majority of obviously Republicans and a majority of independents, but more than half of Democrats think that that’s just a little crazy, folks — a little too much — to get angry about not telling someone’s 5-year-old about the 37 genders that exist now on some college application. (sigh) I’m fired up about this one.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

BUCK: “To criminalize you and take your kids.” That is Equality Florida executive director Nadine Smith telling Disney employees — in some official video conference — that DeSantis, Florida, the Parental Rights Bill is ultimately about criminalizing people from the LGBTQIA+ community and taking away their children. That’s madness. It is insane. It is nowhere in the bill.

It is completely crazy to suggest that that’s what is being intended here. But just to give you a sense of how overheated the rhetoric is from the activist community, that’s the kind of stuff that’s being said — in official corporate training, mind you. This is not just someone with an opinion standing on a street corner.

This is somebody who is indoctrinating employees of the Disney corporation and, as we all see now, Disney is gonna find out, I think, it doesn’t run the state of Florida, actually. Turns out that it’s just a company, and you know what? Moving their whole facility is gonna be pretty expensive. So I think they’re gonna have to be stuck here.

CLAY: Disney needs Florida politicians way more than Florida politicians need Disney, in terms of a power dynamic. They’re not gonna relocate Disney World. They’re not gonna relocate the massive amount of footprint that they have in Orlando, and I don’t even know if Disney understands what they have unleashed.

Because I feel like there’s a ton of parents listening to us right now, Buck, and they are furious over all of this because what they want Disney to represent is just a company that they can trust and have their kids consume their content and not have to worry about it. I can speak as a parent. That’s overwhelmingly what they want Disney to represent.

They want Disney to represent the movies that they grew up on, right? If you’re older, the Peter Pans and the Snow Whites and that era of films. If you’re younger, Little Mermaid, Aladdin, all of those things. Watch those films and tell me that they in any way were making aggressive political comments on anything. They were just trying to entertain kids, and we live in an era now where — and I think Bob Chapek, the CEO of Disney, was trying to be smart and stay out of this.

And that’s when I say that he’s been captured by the Trojan Horse inside of his own company. I think his instincts were right. Disney doesn’t need to get involved in individual bills that are being passed. But what happened was his own job — and this is what I think happens far too often, Buck. Guys and girls who are in positions of authorities inside of companies become terrified that they’re going to lose their job if they oppose anything. Remember, not taking a stand is what — in my opinion — most companies should do on most issues.

BUCK: Excuse me, Clay, but I have been informed by very smart, blue check libs that “silence equals violence.”

CLAY: Yeah, that’s right, and that’s what they try to argue now. But the reality is in a 50-50 America — which, by the way, is rapidly slanting more towards the Republican Party because of stories like these. In a 50-50 America, Disney’s job should be to appeal to everyone of all political aspersions. And the way you do that typically is by not getting caught up in all of the craziness that’s going on.

BUCK: I’ll just point out that this is also… Disney was built on that promise that you’re talking about.

CLAY: Yes. Yes.

BUCK: That promise to every parent and every person. I grew up watching Disney movies. So many of us have such a really fondness and emotional association, nostalgic memories of Disney, a great American company making great products that inspire people, that make them feel good, that tell great stories. That’s what we want. They still could do that.

What’s fascinating is they’ll say, “Sorry, crazy right-wing bigots but things have changed now.” Well, they’re gonna ruin Disney, you see. The people in charge now didn’t build the company that they are running. They are woke bureaucrats from inside the corporate system who have risen to the top. They have seized the reins of something that they themselves — they’ve seized the levers of power inside an institution — they didn’t build. To borrow from Obama, “They didn’t build that.” They didn’t build that, right?

CLAY: Right.

BUCK: And so this is what’s happening in a lot of these companies where you see great, storied American companies with a promise to the American people that’s been kept up for decades, now it’s being ruined and the left says, yeah, go build your own. Okay. We’re gonna have to start building our own, one, and number two, they’ve destroyed the neutral ground.

Companies that take stances like Disney must suffer the consequences. Folks, if you don’t start making decisions about this stuff, they will just continue to weaponize corporations that they did not build, overwhelmingly — well, in the case of Disney — in order to get policies that you don’t want to live with.

CLAY: For a long time, many people out there have said, “I don’t want to get involved in this.” Well, the left wingers always get involved, and when they put the pressure on companies to take stands, they’re taking stands that are directly contra to what many of you believe. So saying, “Hey, we need to be entirely neutral,” which is often the default Republican response, doesn’t win because of the woke universe will not accept neutrality. And so I think Disney needs to feel pain over this decision on a corporate level, on a dollars-and-cents level. I think that they need to understand that there is at least half the population that they are alienating.

Recent Stories

Will Joe Biden Pardon His Son?

30 Mar 2022

CLAY: We’re talking a lot on the show — and have been for a while — about Donald Trump’s decision regarding running in 2024. And I believe and Buck believes he’s going to run in 2024, and he would make that announcement sometime early in 2023. What we have not talked as much about is Joe Biden’s gonna have to make a choice about whether he is going to run or not early in 2023 as well.

So we got the midterm coming up in about six months, shellacking expected of the Democrats. Republicans take back control of the House, may well take back control of the Senate as well. Obviously in a 50-50 Senate, more difficult to project. But if that shellacking occurs, then Joe Biden shortly after the first of the year, Buck, is going to have to make a decision which no American president, I don’t believe, has made.

Correct me if I’m wrong on this. I think Lyndon Johnson is the last American president who was eligible to run that announced he would not seek reelection. I believe I’m correct in that, that every president who has had the opportunity to seek reelection has sought reelection except for LBJ, who chose not to run for reelection. Now, the reason I bring this up is that I don’t think Joe Biden’s gonna run.

And I believe the way these stories are coming out about Hunter Biden, they are effectively letting him know, “Your free ride is over, Bud. You aren’t that useful to us anymore. You’re going to lose the House and probably the Senate. You’re not gonna be able to get anything passed. You’re old, you’re decrepit, you’re unable to lead.” The Democrats have gotten everything they can out of Joe Biden. They’re gonna toss his political career to the side.

BUCK: This is what we’ve been thinking may happen all along, but now that it seems closer than ever. You look at all the polls as we’re heading to this midterm, I know everyone will say, “Oh, but it’s months and months away; it’s an eternity in politics.” Things could change a bit. There could be a swing in the Democrats’ favor with the economy a little bit.

You know, there could be some things. Very unlikely that the sentiment right now is going to change dramatically, and we haven’t even talked about the border today and other things. Just gonna get worse. It’s been the worse year ever at the U.S.-Mexico border, most likely this year, 2022, after the worst year last year ever in terms of illegal apprehensions at the border.

So there’s a lot of things that I think are working against them. But now that we’re actually looking at this, think about what it would mean. I mean, the Democrat apparatus would essentially be admitting that what the critics of Biden had said all along — that he wasn’t up for this, shouldn’t be president — was right, and then that even the vice-presidential…

If they don’t go with Kamala they’ll be essentially admitting that that criticism was also right, and so then you get to the point they’re gonna try to run Hillary. And you try to run Hillary, and then, I mean, you know, Trump? There’s no one Trump would rather run against than Hillary. I think, really, Trump would rather run against Hillary than Biden even in the current situation just ’cause he knows, you know, he knows that whole Clinton routine. He knows he beat her before, he feels like he’ll beat her again. Do you think, though…? I mean, do you even…? Did I force the Nashville Nostradamus into an answer here?

CLAY: I think he’s… I think so. If I’m correct —

BUCK: Will he pardon? Will he pardon his son Hunter if he faces criminal charges and deal with all of that reality?

CLAY: Yes, I think he will. Only, though, if he’s not running because he can’t pardon his son and get reelected. Right? He could get reelected and pardon his son after he was reelected.

BUCK: And so the reason I’m asking this is ’cause I know this is a few levels down the road and also I obviously still think he’s not gonna get, although I’m sweating it a little bit more today, but he’s not gonna get criminally indicted. But it does feel like if they were trying to create a circumstance within the Democrat apparatus that Biden would have to do exactly what you’ve said.

Allowing his son to finally be in criminal jeopardy and forcing him to make the pardon that the second he makes, he’s no longer politically viable ’cause that’s just too much for, the independents and the American people that they’re gonna need to vote for them in a reelect, it’s almost like this is the mechanism they’ve been holding back the whole time. And therefore, they force Biden’s hand to step down by allowing his son to be prosecuted.

CLAY: And I think Biden, if he decides not to run, will actually cite some form of health.

BUCK: Of course.

CLAY: I think he will say, “Look, I just can’t do it,” and I think that honestly will be accurate. But I don’t think he’s gonna be able to point to anything else.

BUCK: What do we say, Clay, if in two years or 18 months’ time, let’s say, whatever it is, there’s a report from the White House that Joe Biden, it’s very sad, but he has come out to say that he’s in the early onset of dementia because of his age? We would all say, well, yeah.

CLAY: Yeah, it’s been self-evident for a long time, and I think that ties in as we go into the third hour, Buck, I keep what’s also going on with the Washington Post and the New York Times and CNN is they’re slowly acknowledging the Hunter Biden scandal that’s been hidden in plain sight to the left wing for the past 18 months. There’s an element of being angry that you have to acknowledge that all the people on the right wing who you hate were a hundred percent right about this.

BUCK: Oh, yes.

Recent Stories

Karol Markowicz on the Teachers Union, Hunter Biden, Fauci

30 Mar 2022

BUCK: Our friend Karol Markowicz, columnist from the New York Post and a new Florida resident, by the way, after leaving New York after decades. Karol, great to have you again.

MARKOWICZ: Hi, guys, thanks for having me.

BUCK: Let’s just lay it out for everybody. I know FoxNews.com had the story up, they had the exclusive on this one, but there’s now what we would call smoking gun email proof that Fauci, the CDC, et cetera, just took like line-by-line edit does on opening schools or not from teachers unions.

MARKOWICZ: Yeah. So the thing is we’ve known all along that this was the case. It’s just ever more evidence is coming up to further prove that that was the truth. And again, you know, you and I, the three of us have discussed this all along that we knew that Randi Weingarten sat down with the CDC and said that their move to move from six feet of distance to three feet of distance in classrooms was not gonna work for her and they’re gonna need to change the science to fit what her members want.

So we’ve known this for a year. I recall writing about this a year ago that this was going on. It’s just that now we have more proof. I don’t know who this proof is going to change their mind. I think that the left really doesn’t want to hear that “the science” is not the science, and that Randi Weingarten gets to dictate scientific policy. But if it moves anybody over to the side of sanity, I’m glad to see it.

CLAY: Yesterday, Karol, on our show, Ron DeSantis was a guest, and he said he hasn’t met anyone who has relocated to Florida and regretted the decision.

MARKOWICZ: No, me either.

CLAY: I’m curious. I’m sure you, as a mom, have met at this point lots of other moms who have made it decision, lots of other people who have relocated.

MARKOWICZ: Yeah.

CLAY: What has your interactions with people who’ve relocated to Florida partly to ensure your kids have a normal school going experience, what have those interactions been like?

MARKOWICZ: I’m telling you that the main complaint that I hear from people who have relocated is why didn’t we do this sooner? Like, we did we wait until covid forced us out? Why didn’t we see that freedom and liberty was available in Florida all along, that the weather is amazing, that the people are normal. There’s so much going for this state and has been for so long. But I didn’t see it until covid.

I didn’t understand how much more I could have, how much more my family could have until covid really forced me to see things that I couldn’t unsee. I couldn’t unsee them, my New York neighbors didn’t care that people who couldn’t send their kids to private schools didn’t have options, and that while their kids had pods and tutors, their neighbors who didn’t have as much as them couldn’t have those things.

And in Florida the governor made sure that all schools were open. He forced that issue. And he did it at a political peril. It wasn’t an obvious answer at the time. It wasn’t like everybody was, “Oh, yeah, schools should open.” It was like, “Oh, maybe schools shouldn’t open,” and he put his political capital on the line, and he was right every step of the way, and I wish we had done this sooner.

BUCK: We’re speaking to Karol Markowicz, columnist at the New York Post and a stalwart in support of children being able to be in school, in person, without masks all across the country, which I know for many people listening, Karol, they’re like, “Yeah, of course,” like that’s the way it’s been for a long time.

MARKOWICZ: Yeah. (laughing) Yeah.

BUCK: Not in New York State, not in California. There are a bunch of places where there’s still a lot of lingering madness. But I actually wanted to get your sense of how the Parental Rights in Education bill is creating so much tumult on the left. I mean, they’re going all-in, the Oscars obviously, which we all know what got the most attention there.

But people were making comments about the “don’t say gay” bill. And I’m sure you’ve seen this stuff that Chris Rufo has found and put out on the internet of the Disney senior executive talking about the need to essentially push these — like openly, push these agendas to children in cartoons.

MARKOWICZ: Yeah.

BUCK: I think the left is gonna find out in this midterm — I’m hoping they’ll find out in this midterm — that when you tell parents they’re not allowed to be involved in their kids’ education and that left-wing indoctrination is a necessary thing, they’re gonna find there’s a backlash to this.
MARKOWICZ: Yes. Yeah, absolutely. I have spoken to parents in Florida all across the political spectrum, and none of them think that kindergarteners, first graders, second graders, or third graders should be learning about sexual orientation or gender anything in school. And the thing is this absolutely happens. Parents know that kids are being indoctrinated with this kind of stuff very early.

And it doesn’t have to be, you know, anything to do… It actually has nothing to do with gay at all. There’s absolutely nothing in the bill that says you can’t say gay, so the fact that they’re repeating “gay” constantly makes no sense. It’s really about introducing the concept of transgenderism to very small kids who are very susceptible to, you know, information from authority leaders around them. I’ve seen this with my own eyes.

I’ve seen kids be told that they can be anything they want to be, and they end up believing that they are the opposite gender just because somebody in an authority position gave them that option. Kids are… You know, they don’t know a lot yet, and they absolutely pick up cues from their teachers and their parents and people around them.

The funny thing about this whole thing is that Disney has taken a ridiculous stand that has nothing to do with their business model. And it’s just every corporation that embraces wokeness in this way ends up hurting themselves. It’s absurd that Disney would get involved in this. And those videos yesterday should give parents, I mean, a real scare about what their kids are watching on Disney programs.

CLAY: No doubt. Karol, you work at the New York Post. We’re gonna dive into in a big way this Hunter Biden story suddenly being validated I think it was last week by the New York Times.

MARKOWICZ: Mmm-hmm. Yeah.

CLAY: A couple of hours ago, the Washington Post suddenly comes out and says: Oh, by the way, all the emails; the laptop story was real. CNN is now covering it 18 months later.

MARKOWICZ: Mmm-hmm.

CLAY: How much validation do you take as an employee of the New York Post that your paper got all of this right 18 months ago? If there were real journalism justice you’d get like the next — your paperwork and the writers who worked on this like the next 10 years’ — worth of Pulitzers, right, because they spoke truth to the face of power, and it took a long time for it to be validated. What is the vibe in the New York Post newsroom as everyone else suddenly acknowledges, “Oh, yes, those guys got it right?”

MARKOWICZ: (chuckles) So it’s funny because the New York Times story did not have any additional information. It was like, “We have now confirmed that information that was available is correct.”

CLAY: No doubt. Yes.

MARKOWICZ: Mmm-hmm. I think the big story — and I fully agree that the people at the New York Post have been validated. I think the fact that Twitter and Facebook had gotten so deeply involved in shutting down the story that you couldn’t DM it to anybody. It was really absurd, to make people afraid of what is happening online and how much control these companies have over us.

I think the real question — and I’m sure that you both will be diving into this — is, why now? Why are all these news organizations going into this now? And, to me, I mean, it’s a pretty easy answer that they don’t want Biden to be the 2024 nominee, and this is a way to injure him without making it seem like they’re really throwing anything at him. But, you know, I’m looking forward to hearing what you guys have to say about it.

CLAY: I think that’s a hundred percent right.

BUCK: We were actually talking about this, Karol. It’s like you’re the third on the conversation we just had before the show.

MARKOWICZ: (chuckles)

BUCK: We were talking of this on air because, just so you know, Clay and I make a lot of jokes about we have an on-air bet about whether or not there will be charges against Hunter Biden. My contention is not that Hunter Biden… Hunter Biden clearly broke the law, but up until this point I think it has been clear that the apparatus whether it’s Biden’s DOJ, the libs that run prosecutors’ offices, et cetera, was willing to look the other way and/or protect him, the same way they did Hillary.

Remember, what Hillary did was recklessness under the statute of handling classified information. I had a TS clearance; I know what this is like. She broke the law — full stop — and Comey just said, no prosecutor would bring charges. That’s just not true they protected her. I’m wondering now — and we’ll be talking about this as to whether, to the point you make about Biden, whether Hunter is no longer a made guy, so to speak.

MARKOWICZ: (laughing) Right.

BUCK: Remember in The Departed, there are guys you can’t hit? Hunter had kind of been, for the lib corporate media, a guy you can’t hit. It starts to feel like they decide all of a sudden, no, he is a guy you can hit.

MARKOWICZ: Right. I think he’s more like Joe Pesci in Goodfellas. (laughing) He’s gonna be invited into a room to get made and get whacked instead.

CLAY: Very well. Very good analogy.

MARKOWICZ: He doesn’t have that protection anymore. I think they will go after him.

BUCK: And then there’s also our mutual… We’re speaking to Karol Markowicz of the New York Post, New York Post columnist. There’s Fauci. we’re also gonna be talking about him in a little bit. he’s still out there. I mean, this guy is talking about going back to restrictions.

MARKOWICZ: Yeah.

BUCK: And I really… I get so mad and just so angry about all of this that it’s almost hard for me to verbalize my feelings about this guy and people that are still supporting him.

MARKOWICZ: Yeah.

BUCK: Do you think we’ve reached the point where a solid majority of the American people across party lines realize he is an evil little tyrant smurf and was wrong about everything or not?

MARKOWICZ: (laughing) No. Across party lines? Absolutely not. I think all the blue areas will listen to everything he says, follow all the directions to the letter, and put in the same failed tactics that have not worked the whole time. I already see New York going back to masks. I see it. It has been mandated yet but I already see it. Like, my kids’ old school in New York, the school bus is back to masking.

BUCK: It’s crazy, Clay. I think she sees it too. I see people walking around New York City where I live and there are outdoor maskers all over the place still, all over the place.

CLAY: It’s never going to go away, unless the message is so crystal clear that there is a reckoning in the midterms. This is what we’ve been arguing, Buck, that we have to end up with a reckoning in this spot. I think we lost Karol. Karol may have dropped off there but she does fantastic work.

MARKOWICZ: Oh, no, I’m here.

CLAY: Oh, we still got you u give you the last word, Karol.

CLAY: Yeah, do you think that kids are gonna have to wear masks again in school if you were betting?

MARKOWICZ: Yes. If I was betting — and I’m a betting woman — I would bet in blue areas masks will be introduced before the next school year.

CLAY: Ugh. Moms and dads out there with kids, I just can’t imagine if you live that blue state or blue city, and your kids have to put masks back on. Karol, fantastic work as always.

MARKOWICZ: Thank you so much, guys.

CLAY: We appreciate you.

BUCK: Thanks, Karol.

MARKOWICZ: Thank you.

Recent Stories

Stewart vs. Sullivan on White Supremacy

30 Mar 2022

BUCK: Jon Stewart has been a propagandist for the left for a very long time. I mean, he is a huge lib, and really kind of created an art form or built this art form of comedy, political commentary as a form of propaganda where you don’t have to really answer for what you say, ’cause, “Ha-ha-ha, man! I’m just makin’ jokes. It’s puppets on this show before I come on the air,” ’cause he had the Crank Yankers show, whatever. That’s the way that he was doing things for a long time, and now he’s kind of back, I guess, with an Apple TV+ show. Did you see some of this, Clay, the Apple TV+ show?

CLAY: Yeah, I saw the clips. I don’t know how to… It’s getting to the point now, Buck, where I really feel like an old man. I can’t sometimes find shows anymore, right? Like, I’ve got… I feel like we’ve got every different service we’re signed up for, but there’s so many different places, I can’t even find things. So I don’t even know how to find the Jon Stewart show, but I’ve seen the clips.

BUCK: Here’s what he says about… Well, you know, there’s a whole “the problem with white people is…” Of course, Jon Stewart’s white.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: But the problem — which plenty of white liberals love to do this whole, “I’m fighting against white supremacy” thing. It’s virtual signaling. It’s pathetic. It’s what they do. But here you go. Jon Stewart showing how wokeness doesn’t even really make sense — and after you’re a multimillionaire benefiting from the system, tens of millions of dollars paid to be a Democrat shill — you go on this show now and say the following. Play clip 9.

BUCK: By the way, Andrew Sullivan, of course, I think is speaking sense here. This whole… This obsession with talking about how white supremacist America is today, it never actually sustains itself as an argument when it’s subjected to any criticism, and then you do what Jon Stewart does. You start cursing and (angrily), “Oh, you just don’t… You just don’t want to have a conversation! You don’t want to have a conversation about racism.”

CLAY: The number one response that I would have for anybody out there that finds themselves in these conversations, like Jon Stewart, you know, where there is a white liberal that wants to tell you that America is an awful place and rooted in white supremacy. Just say what is true: America does not have a perfect history. No person or entity has a perfect history, right?

Let’s be clear. But if America was a fundamentally white supremacist nation today, how do Asian men make more money than anybody else in the country? This would be a huge failure of white supremacy, right, that we would allow Asian minorities — men — to arrive in this country and earn more than anyone else, any other ethnic group, which is true.

And there isn’t a response. Right? They don’t have a response, because that is tangible evidence of the fact that America is not a white supremacist country because Asian people — Asian men in particular, in this modern era — are more successful economically than any group of people in America. How does that happen?

BUCK: Clay, Nigerian immigrants to America make more per capita than white Americans baron in this country, Nigerian immigrants.

CLAY: Yes. Yes. It’s a great question.

BUCK: So again, a fascinating failure of the white supremacist system that we’re all supposed to be living in all the time. But this has become really a religious obsession for the left. I mean, this is their worldview, is that we are all soaked in this country, in this constant white supremacy, and it’s something we’re gonna have to continue to dissect and pull apart and address because, well, what is the alternative? We’re all supposed to sit here and you’re supposed to apologize? Apologize to whom and for what? What is really the answer?

CLAY: The alternative is what they’re trying to create — I really believe this — is a system whereby you destroy the entire foundation of America. The Constitution is not legitimate, because there were white supremacists; there were slave owners who wrote it.

BUCK: Yep.

CLAY: The Declaration of Independence. All of it, the foundational documents of our country are, in their view, so stained by historical neglect and error as it pertains to race, that they shouldn’t exist anymore. They want to destroy the foundation of this country.

BUCK: Mmm.

CLAY: I really do believe that’s the essence of what they’re attempting.

BUCK: And we want to defend the foundation, the greatness of this country and save the countries as much as possible —

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: — and all of you listening are helping us.

Recent Stories

Colbert Calls for Violence Against Doocy, OJ Relates to Will Smith

30 Mar 2022

CLAY: Obviously Will Smith smacking Chris Rock has gotten a lot of attention, and then you have Stephen Colbert — who, by the way, getting beaten now by the Gutfeld show on a regular basis in the evening. The most watched evening show on ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox News is now on Fox News. More people are watching Gutfeld in the evening than are watching Stephen Colbert, who had been winning the nightly contest. He said (summarized), “Hey, Fox News Channel’s Peter Doocy, he deserves a slap for asking about Russia.” Listen to this.

BUCK: This is Soviet style.

CLAY: He should be slapped, Buck, for asking a question, which is a hundred percent a valid question.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: Like, why would you not want the president to answer a question? He may not answer it; that’s fine. But you should as a journalist be asking, “What is a ‘significant response” to chemical weapons going to look like?” I mean, that’s the number one question. If I told you, Buck, “Hey, if I tell one of my kids, ‘Hey, there’s gonna be a significant response if you don’t follow directions when it comes to taking over your brother,’ it’s the natural response of the kid to be like, ‘Okay, what’s the significant response?'” I mean, that’s the number one question that should be asked, and it’s ridiculous.

BUCK: It’s actually worse than that, though, because what he said initially… They’re making fun of Doocy for asking for clarification, “Oh, yeah, like we would tell you.” He was asking for the clarification because the initial Biden gaffe which they admitted was a gaffe ’cause they walked it back right away was “respond in kind.” If someone —

CLAY: Meaning you were gonna respond with chemical weapons.

BUCK: If you tell someone, “If you stab me, I’m going to stab you back,” that is responding in kind.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: And when you’re talking about chemical weapon usage, that’s what that phrase would mean. Now, this is one of three things Biden said, although I will say the only one that I thought — and they did walk it back, too, but was a little… When he said, you’ll see with your own eyes the Ukrainian people who are gonna stand up against the Russians.

You could say that that you could see it on the news or whatever. So that one I thought… The big problem was obviously the regime change comment about how Putin can’t stay in power. That was the biggest. But this one about chemical weapons was also clearly sloppy. But notice what’s happened here. This is just cleanup crew on aisle, “Oh, my God, Joe Biden just said something again!”

CLAY: (chuckling)

BUCK: You have Colbert making it seem as though the person who’s trying to — in this case, Doocy at Fox — get clarity and therefore accountability for a blundered statement from the president. The person asking the question is the problem, not the clearly not up for the job, senile commander-in-chief who is making these gaffes. He’s not the problem.

That’s the whole point of this, and that’s what he tries to achieve with laughter. They’re just propagandists for the regime. I mean, it’s gross. It’s unseemly what Colbert and these others do — and under the banner of comedy? Ha-ha-ha! Yeah, whatever makes us the most effective toadies for the Biden regime. It’s not funny.

CLAY: This is also unseemly. OJ Simpson — who killed two people in cold blood with a knife and got away with it, Buck — weighed in on Will Smith’s slap (chuckles) and said: No, that was inappropriate.

Listen.

BUCK: Well, to be fair, Will Smith didn’t step on stage with a bloody butcher knife —

CLAY: — and stab people to death. By the way, I’ve heard this, Buck. I was out in Vegas for the NCAA tournament. I was out to dinner. There are women throwing themselves at OJ, like, desperate to date him, desperate to sleep with him, young women, according to the people that I was with.

BUCK: Come on.

CLAY: Yes. And you heard the music in the background there, OJ is evidently out and about at restaurants and clubs all the time in Las Vegas where he lives now, and he is swarmed by good-looking young girls who want to be with OJ Simpson. If you’re listening to me right now and you’re like, “How upside down is the world?”

Can you imagine if you got a call from your 22-year-old daughter who was in Las Vegas and you’re like, “Hey, who you hanging out with?” and she’s like, “OJ Simpson! He’s such a great guy.” This is how upside down the world is, either these girls are all so stupid that they don’t even know he committed double murder, or they think because he’s famous.

He’s certainly not rich because they took all his assets — but they think because he’s famous they want to spend time with him. I couldn’t believe it, but they swear that it’s true, Buck. So I just… I know we got a lot of listeners, by the way, heard that we are now number one in our time slot in Las Vegas; so some of you out there who are listening to this right now definitely may be saying to yourself, “Hey, I’ve seen on just out and he’s pulling lots of tail.” I know it’s crazy to think about but that may be the world we live in, Buck.

BUCK: You know what they say in Vegas, Clay?

CLAY: Yeah?

BUCK: “Always bet on Clay and Buck.”

CLAY: (chuckling) It also doesn’t always stay in Vegas if you get stabbed to death by OJ. Just a tip for those girls out there.

Recent Stories

Let the Caravans Roll! Biden Regime to Lift Title 42

30 Mar 2022

CLAY: This is from the Wall Street Journal. Headline: “Biden Administration to Lift Title 42 Border Policy — The pandemic era policy allowing migrants to be turned away at the border will end May 23rd.” So we know already, Buck, a million “interactions,” effectively, have occurred at the border already in basically halfway through the year.

BUCK: Apprehensions, just to be clear.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Apprehensions, right, ’cause interactions could be the legal stuff too. These are people that are being taken into custody for violation of U.S. federal law.

CLAY: So once this comes to an end, “the government will need to consider any asylum claims made at the border, which requires,” I’m reading from the Wall Street Journal, “a brief detention before they can be released into the U.S. or deported. Under Title 42, any migrant asking for humanitarian protection could still be sent back to Mexico, though in practice Mexico has limited how many people it’s willing to take back.”

So they are afraid at the border that they are going to be rapidly overwhelmed, and this seems very likely to happen, Buck, sooner rather than later. Again, the date, according to this, just in time for the weather conditions being good enough, right, for people to start to cross — so you can start to travel all over Latin America through April into May to make your way up to the border — it will officially end May 23rd.

BUCK: And let’s remember what the incentive is here for the Biden Department of Homeland Security under Mayorkas and the Biden regime at this stage. What they’re going to care about — and their concern here is a replay at some level of what we had at the border of months back where the Haitian — what was it, about 20,000 or so mostly Haitian migrants in Texas —

CLAY: Del Rio Texas, right.

BUCK: — had all gathered in one place because that was a visual manifesting of the exploitation at our border of our own laws and the lawlessness that was underway, and people, they can’t hide that. They tried. Remember when they tried to ban drone footage in the area or something?

CLAY: Yes. Oh yes.

BUCK: They didn’t want people to see the full-scale. So they tried to hide it, and then they made the story about the horseback whipping, which wasn’t whipping. It was split reins, and they’re, as you pointed out, still investigating that to get to the bottom of it.

CLAY: Six months later.

BUCK: So they can say, “Oh, we’re still investigating so just…” That’s just to run out the clock and so everyone forgets about what they tried to do. But the Biden administration’s primary concern here is gonna be optics. If there is a massive surge of illegals to try to come across the border what they will first and foremost want to make sure is that they process them quickly and get them into the U.S.

They’re fine with that. They just don’t want a mass of people at the border who are coming in illegally because the American people — in an election year — will see that and will know what is going on. The numbers hit home. The visual of 10, 15, 20, maybe 20,000-plus people all the one place, Clay? That really sticks in people’s memories about what’s going on at our southern border.

Recent Stories

Biden Pushes Shot #4: Do It Today!

30 Mar 2022

BUCK: Endless boosters. Exactly what we told you they were going to push for, and here we are.

BUCK: Biden there just speaking about how he’s so excited to be getting shot number four. And you have to wonder, he’s talking about the fall. So I’m gonna assume ’cause also that the boosters wane in efficacy within 60 days or so. Yeah.

CLAY: Going to five!

BUCK: Oh, he’s getting number five this fall, folks. He’s gonna be (impression), “Get fifth booster shot! It’s great, works so well. You need number six, though, for it to work real well.”

CLAY: Can you imagine if we had said back in January on our shows, “Hey, these new vaccines, by March everybody’s gonna be on their fourth one in order for them to be effective”? You would have got banned. We’re gonna talk, by the way, to Alex Berenson on Friday, Dr. Marty Makary tomorrow. But there’s no doubt, Buck, that by the fall, Joe Biden’s gonna be getting his fifth shot — his fifth shot.

Recent Stories