×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

This White Man Killed by Police Won’t Get George Floyd Attention

17 Mar 2022

CLAY: Serious story out there that I don’t think is gonna get very much attention, although arguably, given what happened with George Floyd, it should. And this is a tough story, and many of you may not have heard about it at all, but it comes from Los Angeles.

We’re reading from the Daily Mail. They have the video up. It is a difficult watch. Buck, you sent this to me earlier today so that I could watch it and prep for the show. I’m just gonna give you a rough outline of the story here: A 38-year-old man named Edward Bronstein died on March 31st of 2020, a little over two months before the George Floyd incident. Footage of his death was just released by the police department in Los Angeles yesterday after his family sued so that they could see the video surrounding his death.

This 38-year-old man, by the way, father of two, was pulled over for suspicion of drunk driving. And they were trying to take blood from him to determine whether or not he was drunk. And he was forced onto a mat in the police station garage, he was handcuffed, five L.A. police officers then kneeled on his back while they put the needle in to extract blood. His family says that he had an incredible fear of needles. He screams, “I can’t breathe” 11 times before eventually going silent. This is a really hard tape to watch.

Buck, you and I, from the moment the George Floyd video went public, we are, first of all, defenders of police in general. We need more police. We need as talented of people as possible willing to take on the job of police. But sometimes police, like people who have every sort of profession under the sun, behave in ways that may well be illegal. And when that occurred, there needs to be charges that are brought.

What is devastating about watching this video is this man, 38-year-old again, Edward Bronstein. He’s a white guy — same thing happens to him that happened to George Floyd, and this was over two years ago. The tape is just now coming out.

When we talk about larger police issues, I think oftentimes when race is made the primary focus, it misses the larger story. Buck, you look at the data from the Washington Post. Seventy-five percent of people who are killed by police every year are white, Asian, or Hispanic. I think that data stuns people. Stuns people when they hear that 75% of people who are killed by police are white, Asian, and Hispanic.

And so what will be interesting is as this lawsuit progresses and given the fact that this video is now out and the man is saying basically the same exact thing that George Floyd said, will a white man being knelt on by five different police officers in Los Angeles, will this be a story at all? Will there be any marches? That there was any discussion about this in the larger cultural sphere?

BUCK: The law enforcement agency involved here was California Highway Patrol. And they were the ones that then fought the release of this tape. And we, honestly, we could play just the audio for you. It’s bone-chilling. I mean, it’s horrifying. This guy, Bronstein, now deceased, he’s a father, there’s a photo on the Daily Mail, you see little daughter, he is screaming for his life and screaming “I can’t breathe.

BUCK: 11 times — the exact same thing that George Floyd was screaming. Now, the video of George Floyd was taken by bystanders that got out there sooner. I understand that there are some differences here in the situation.

Now, Clay and I thought this is a story you should know about because, first of all, the narrative immediately with George Floyd — it wasn’t so much that it was a case of police brutality, it’s that it was a case of racist police brutality. That was assumed right away. And when you actually understand more about cases across the country — Clay mentioned the Washington Post numbers — what you find is that, yeah, there are cops who cross the line, there are cops who do bad things. But law enforcement in general in America is actually not racist.

CLAY: And the left and the Democrats, progressives run with this narrative at the first opportunity, and they don’t ever stop to look at the facts. I mean, here you see that this police restraint of a shoulder on the back or the neck in some circumstances clearly can be fatal for people, and it wasn’t just something that happened to George Floyd, it happened to this individual Bronstein before the George Floyd incident, just to be clear.

And then to have the we have part of — this will not result in marches. This will not be BLM, a national phenomenon that we all have to talk about and have a long conversation about police violence or anything else because it doesn’t fit the racial component, and it doesn’t have that narrative heft from the left. They will not care about this story. They will not care about police violence in this case.

Five officers involved. No charges brought against any of the officers, so far. The LA County coroner’s office ruled that this man, Bronstein, died, quote, “As a result of acute methamphetamine intoxication during restraint by law enforcement,” very similar to the argument that the police officers put forward in the George Floyd case, which was Floyd was under the influence of drugs and that was what caused his death, not the actions of the police officers. That was the defense.

So in this situation the five officers not charged and the L.A. County coroner’s determination that the drugs caused the death, not the police officers’ actions, has been accepted without any argument to the contrary.

Now, maybe with the video out, reminder, this happened before George Floyd, happened in March of 2020, and, Buck, it’s interesting to think about how different, how different George Floyd situation might have been covered if this Bronstein video had been public at the time. Because one of the primary arguments — you remember this — of Black Lives Matter was, this would never have happened to a white guy.

BUCK: They say it all the time. All the time. That was not true.

CLAY: Not true.

BUCK: In fact, one of the only pieces I ever had go viral when I worked at TheHill.com was about a shooting in Arizona, and there’s another horrific video of a guy who’s clearly — he did nothing wrong, nothing illegal. He was in hysterics because someone had called almost an accidental swatting, had called law enforcement onto the scene.

He had a BB gun — totally legal for him to have — someone thought it was a rifle, and police, two of them with long guns see him in the hallway and are shouting commands at him and just start shooting this guy. Because he didn’t comply quickly enough.

CLAY: Oh, I watched that. He’s on his knees

BUCK: That’s right. He was saying, “Cross your legs. Now crawl,” and the kid goes to pull up his shorts, and he’s got two guns trained on him, and one of the officers just — they did bring murder charges, but I think the jury got it wrong. The jury found that the officer was not guilty of murder in that case. But these things do happen, is the point. And it happens to people regardless of race, ethnicity, or background, but that’s not the narrative the left ever wants to tell.

CLAY: And most of you will never hear about this story. The Edward Bronstein story. My prediction — maybe that will turn into a big story. I bet that most of you will not hear a single word about this story in mainstream media at all because it challenges the narrative that this was a race based murder, which is what was said about George Floyd and remains to be seen what’s gonna happen to these California Highway Patrol officers and also whether there will be any sort of consequences as a result of these action.

But we just wanted to share it with you because it’s a larger picture of what goes on in a day-to-day basis. And, by the way, I’m not sure there’s any show that supports police officers more. And, Buck, if you talk to police officers, nobody hates a crooked cop or a bad cop more than a good cop, because they paint all police officers in a bad light.

BUCK: Makes their jobs harder, puts them at greater risk, strains relations with the committee, cops do hate dirty cops and for anyone who says, oh, Buck that’s not true, well, I worked at the NYPD intelligence division. You know what one of the interesting statistics was? Over 90% of internal affairs complaints come from other cops.

CLAY: It’s a great stat.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Elizabeth Warren Would Flunk Economics Class

17 Mar 2022

BUCK: The gas prices are too damn high. That is for sure. But they came down a couple of pennies in the last few days; so we got that going for us, which is nice. They gotta figure out, though, the Democrats have to come up with some way, some explanation for this that is not a reflection of their poor decision-making, their Green New Deal, Marxist lunacy, and just other incompetence on display from the Biden regime.

So what do they do? Oh, it’s the big, bad oil companies and also, oh, by the way, the meat companies are to blame for inflation.

WARREN: I think the primary cause of this bout of price increases starts with covid and the fact that we have supply chain kinks and that people rapidly shifted the demand curve so that demand for services went down and demand for goods went up. So those two have forced prices up. That’s part one. But what has also happened is that now that we live in America where there’s a lot more concentration in certain industries — look at the oil industry. Look at meat industry, look at groceries generally, that what’s happened is these companies have said, you know, we’ll pass along costs and while we’re at it and everyone’s talking about rising costs, let’s just add an extra big dollop of cost increases to expand our profit.

BUCK: I want everyone to hear that just as a reminder. Elizabeth Warren is supposed to be one of the more intellectual members of the, you know, far left of the Democrat Party. I think she would fail in Econ 101 class — not even at the college — I think at the high school level.

I don’t think she would pass ’cause she doesn’t understand — and beyond just the lack of conceptual understanding, Clay, like what these companies — blaming Big Oil, gas stations — great report on Fox News actually this morning. Most gas stations are owned by independent proprietors. They’re just passing on the price of what the gas costs.

CLAY: Well, and lots of gas stations make no money off of gas. This is just not understanding basic economics. And the same way that movie theaters make most of their money off of the concessions, they don’t make that much money off of the actual film itself because they have to share so much of the revenue — so many gas stations, because they have to be competitive.

And look. How often is the price of gas station across the street from each other within a penny or two? It’s not very often you see one gas station charging two cents more than another one that you can see the sign for. That’s why, by the way, they have the signs.

Oftentimes the margins are gas stations come not from the gas itself but from the things that people buy inside of the convenience stores when they go to buy gas, right? So one of the big challenges that the Democratic Party has — and, trust me, they got a bunch of now — they don’t have very many people anymore, Buck, with substantial voices in the party that are involved in business.

BUCK: Yep.

CLAY: That understand what making a payroll requires, that understand the difference between a profit and a loss and what that means to the business.

BUCK: The Democrat Party is now effectively ruled by the Oberlin women and gender studies faculty lounge, and the results are not good.

CLAY: Not good at all.

Recent Stories

Judge Lets Bad Actor Jussie Smollett Walk Free

17 Mar 2022

CLAY: Jussie Smollett has been allowed to be released. He spent less than a week in a Chicago prison as his appeal is being considered. So, a judge allowed him to be released to allow his appeal to his convictions to process.

I think it’s the wrong call. I think that Jussie Smollett belonged in prison. The chances of his appeal being granted and found to be with merit, I believe — and this is me putting my lawyer hat on here — very slim. And Jussie Smollett, who claims that the entire world is rigged against him, boy, he sure is getting an awful lot of white privilege, huh, Buck, for a gay black man?

BUCK: I’m sitting here wondering what exactly is the appeal even going to be based on? I mean, to say that they have this guy absolutely, clearly —

CLAY: Dead to rights. Yeah.

BUCK: Yeah. They got video of the guys he paid getting the noose and — I mean, the whole thing it’s so crazy. But I’ll tell you something. I think Jussie Smollett — I think he has problems — like, real mental.

CLAY: You think he might be psychologically — if you come up with this idea, you’re psychologically —

BUCK: I think he’s basically gone crazy. Either that, or maybe this is the greatest acting job of his career.

CLAY: He’s not that great of an actor.

BUCK: I’ve actually never seen him.

CLAY: He’s not that good of an actor, in the grand scheme of things.

Recent Stories

OutKick: Joe Kinsey’s Latest Piece on Lia Thomas

17 Mar 2022

Our 1PM ET guest Joe Kinsey of OutKick’s latest piece on the transgender swimmer:

OutKick: Lia Thomas Smashes Biological Females in NCAA Championship Prelims

 

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

17 Mar 2022

  • OutKick: Lia Thomas Smashes Biological Females In NCAA Championship Prelims
  • New York Post: Now that Joe Biden’s president, the Times finally admits: Hunter’s laptop is real
  • UK Daily Mail: Horrifying video shows final moments of LA DUI suspect who died after screaming ‘I can’t breathe’ ELEVEN times after being pinned to ground face-down for refusing to give blood sample over fear of needles
  • UK Daily Mail: ‘You don’t seem as appalled by the violation of OUR borders!’ Tucker Carlson has fiery clash with GOP rep who says she’s open to no-fly zone over Ukraine but not sending troops to US border with Mexico
  • New York Post: Ukrainians got secret CIA training after Russia’s Crimea invasion in 2014: report
  • Breitbart: Russia Ignores U.N. Court Ordering End of Ukraine War
  • Breitbart: Sweden: Harvests Could Halve Due to Lack of Russian Fertilizers and Manure
  • HotAir: Propaganda Terminator: Arnold Schwarzenegger vs Vladimir Putin

  • New York Post: NYC braces for St. Patrick’s Day without COVID restrictions: ‘Green vomit all the way!’
  • New York Post: Eric Adams: NY athletes who can’t play due to vaccines not top concern
  • BBC: Heathrow Airport drops Covid face mask rules
  • Baltimore Sun: Engineers are hoping to perfect masks before the next COVID wave or pandemic
  • NewsBusters: Nets Ignore New Report Cuomo Covered Up COVID Deaths by 50 Percent
  • The Hill: Germany considers COVID-19 vaccine mandate as case count climbs
  • Washington Post: Isolated and vulnerable amid the covid crisis, some of Hong Kong’s elderly are taking their own lives
  • The Sun: Two people in Israel hit with Covid variant ‘not yet known to the world’
  • Washington Post: A covid surge in Western Europe has U.S. bracing for another wave
  • HotAir: Pandemic over, cont’d: Biden COVID czar out

  • UK Daily Mail: Biden and Democrats turn to targeting energy companies for ‘price gouging’ and increasing pain at the pumps with oil dropping in price but gas still $4.31 a gallon
  • Bloomberg: U.S., Mexico Prepare for New Migrant Wave as Inflation Surges
  • HotAir: Biden may remove Iran’s Revolutionary Guard from terrorist list
  • CNN: Chris Cuomo Hits Back At CNN “Smear Campaign” With $125M Arbitration Demand
  • Mediaite: Chris Cuomo Takes Aim at Jake Tapper, Brian Stelter, Don Lemon in $125 Million Demand Against CNN
  • CNBC: Ex-New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo considers running against Kathy Hochul despite opposition from his own party

  • UK Daily Mail: At least 51% of Americans SUPPORT Florida’s so-called ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill that bans teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity in kindergarten through third grade, new poll finds
  • Daily Wire: ‘There’s No Co-Existing With Evil Like This’: Leading Children’s Hospital Offers Advice For Boys To ‘Tuck’ Their Genitals Out Of Sight
  • New York Post: Los Angeles DA Gascon gives ‘tips’ on how to avoid auto thieves amid crime wave
  • BizPacReview: Jussie Smollett walks free from jail, claims he survived on ice water for 6 days behind bars
  • Daily Wire: Biden’s Supreme Court Pick Championed Advocates Of Critical Race Theory In Lectures, Speeches
  • Daily Wire: Dark Money Mothership Arabella Advisors Distances From Left-Wing Group Demand Justice Amid SCOTUS Push
  • JustTheNews: Former intel chief: FBI ‘for sure’ committed crimes investigating Trump-Russia collusion

  • Recent Stories

    Buck Talks Ukraine, Biden, Masks and Planes on Gutfeld!

    17 Mar 2022

    Check out our highlight reel of Buck’s appearance on the Gutfeld! panel to discuss Ukraine, Biden, masks and planes. It’s 100% concentrated Buck.

    Recent Stories

    Sen. Johnson on Covid, Ukraine, Inflation and More

    16 Mar 2022

    CLAY: We are joined now by Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson. And Senator Johnson, I’ll start with this since we saw the vote yesterday: 57 to 40 in the Senate in favor of ending the mask mandate on airplanes, on trains, everything else, every Republican but Mitt Romney voted yes to do that.

    And even eight Democrats voted as well in favor of ending that mandate, many of whom, four of them, at least, are up for reelection. This means independents are finally starting to get a little bit sane here, don’t you think, Senator Johnson, and recognizing that we’re in an absurd situation to be continuing with these pandemic restrictions two years into this process?

    SEN. JOHNSON: It certainly proves that public opinion is important and it helps sway votes. I noticed a Wall Street Journal opinion poll said about 5% of Americans think covid is the number-one issue facing us. I think people are ready to get on with their lives. Unfortunately, a lot of covid cartel is not.

    They want to continue to push the state of fear. They want to continue to control our lives. And that’s unfortunate, but I think the vast majority of Americans just want the pandemic over and move on with their lives.

    BUCK: Senator Johnson, it’s Buck. How do you think the Biden administration is handling — you probably saw earlier today the short speech he gave a on the situation with Ukraine, there was the Zelensky address to Congress this morning. Put aside that this war shouldn’t have happened in the first place and we all agree it’s terrible, is the Biden administration making the right moves right now? What would you want them to do differently?

    SEN. JOHNSON: I think the fact that President Zelensky felt he had to come before a joint session of Congress and plead for the help he actually needs that Ukrainian people actually need to defend themselves against the atrocity and war crimes of Putin I think is pretty well proof that Biden is not doing what he should be doing.

    We should have obviously supplied them a lot more lethal defensive weaponry before Putin ever invaded Ukraine. What we should have also done is taken a full inventory of what other military assets would be available should Putin invade like the SU-300 anti-aircraft surface-to-air missiles, like the MiG jets, and we should have got that to Ukraine quietly without anybody knowing it whatsoever until those missiles slammed into some Russian jets. But that’s not what happened.

    We had a mini-debacle with the whole dispute over the MiG jets, denying Zelensky some, I think, probably pretty helpful assets. As we saw, they undertook an air strike against an airfield that Russia had taken over.

    Listen. The Ukrainians are showing such courage and, quite honestly, skill. In many places they seem to be fighting Russia to a standstill. They’re initiating counter-offenses right now. They need support. And, unfortunately, the Biden administration has been slow, they’ve been dragged in supplying the support. It’s really shameful.

    CLAY: Senator Johnson, how much are you concerned — there’s been a lot of talk about the jets and what exactly should happen with all of these jets and whether we should allow Ukrainian pilots to potentially come in to Germany and take these jets back into Ukraine. Should we? And where is the line, if we are concerned, where we move from providing support, to engaging in some way in direct conflict with Russia, in your mind?

    SEN. JOHNSON: I think everybody agrees we want to avoid direct conflict. But providing them — what’s the difference between a MiG jet that can knock down a jet or a Stinger missile that can do the same thing? I mean, we’re providing them lethal defensive weaponry. Nobody’s contemplating Ukrainian’s gonna use those for offensive operations into Russia. Defend their homeland, their freedom, their families, their children. That’s completely appropriate.

    You know, one thing we’re not talking enough about, though, is providing information to the Russian people. We’ve seen some very courageous Russians protesting, that one news producer, her protest. We need the Russian people to understand what Putin is doing. The best-case scenario right now is for the Russian people to depose Vladimir. We need to do everything we can to get the Russian people up to speed with what’s actually happening because, let’s face it: Putin is very effective as controlling the media; so that’s something we really ought to triple, quadruple our efforts to inform the Russian people what’s happened. They don’t support this war. They don’t really understand what’s happening.

    BUCK: Speaking to Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. Senator, the Fed is raising interest rates, first time it’s happened since 2018. A lot of us are looking at this trajectory of the economy with, you know, Biden year one in the books. Year two looks like it’s gonna be really shaky. Folks are talking stagflation. Some are even talking recession. What do you see happening here?

    SEN. JOHNSON: Well, I’ve been warning about stagflation for well over a year. I stopped voting for this covid relief after the CARES Act because every time we’d vote for a new trillion-dollar covid relief package, we had a trillion left unspent from the previous session.

    I started hearing from Wisconsin businesses pretty early on that, just like when I started my business in the early eighties when price increases were expected and readily accepted, and then 30 years it’s like pulling teeth getting a a price increase, once we started opening up the monetary spigots and just flooded the economy with trillions of dollars, we were sparking inflation.

    And so for at least over a year businesses once again are in the position where price increases are expected, they’re accepted. Of course I think we’re in a wage price spiral right now where the wage gains people have enjoyed have been wiped out by inflation. I just remember how incredibly difficult it was to break that cycle and it required two people of enormous courage, Ronald Reagan and Paul Volcker to do that in the early eighties. I’m not seeing a whole lot courage here in Washington, D.C., today; so I am highly concerned about not only inflation really harming American families, but stagflation on top of that.

    CLAY: Senator Johnson, we’re coming up on obviously mid-March, and soon people, including yourself — and I’d encourage people listening on our number-one affiliate there we’re ranked the best in the city of Milwaukee to be supporting you — all over Wisconsin as people are listening to us.

    What is going to happen, in your mind, in Congress between now and when everybody goes back and starts officially campaigning in the summer and the fall season? Do you think we try to get — the Biden administration does — a tax increase? Do they try to break up some of the parts of Build Back Better and pass that? Or do you think, by and large, we’re kind of not gonna have a lot of activity in Congress in terms of passing bills? How do you read the tea leaves as a Democratic strategy based on what you see on the Hill right now?

    SEN. JOHNSON: Well, my concern is, for whatever reason, Democrats always want to increase taxes on the American public. You know, President Biden said that he wasn’t gonna increase taxes on anybody making less than $400,000, but it’s important to note that inflation is the Democrat tax on the middle class. But there certainly seems a desire on the part of Democrats to spend more money to tax the hard-earned, you know, fruit of labors of the American public so I’m always concerned about that. I’ve got my antenna up.

    Hopefully, they’ll run out of time. Again I am concerned about that because, let’s face it, Joe Biden is actually saying the solution is to inflation and he’s backed up by a compliant media is literally more deficit spending. It’s insane. It makes no sense. That’s what they actually say. And you gotta be careful. You gotta watch what they say because they actually carry out as best they can.

    CLAY: Senator Johnson, I get — yeah. Building on that, when do you think the congressional session will be over and basically the clock will be run out and everybody will pivot towards midterms? Is it July? When are you anticipating, hey, we’re out of D.C. and people don’t have to worry about tax increases occurring in 2022 and we can go vote in the midterms?

    SEN. JOHNSON: Well, one of two scenarios. Either we reach the August recess, and I think that pretty much campaign mode, or the public opinion polls continue to turn south to a point where Democrats really are afraid that they may be looking a blowout election here. I think that’s — to a certain extent we’re starting to see that scenario, which evidence of that is what happened with the — the anti-mask mandate vote in the Senate.

    CLAY: Yes.

    SEN. JOHNSON: So even Democrats are concerned about polls. It’s not the science that’s changed on this stuff. The polls have changed.

    BUCK: Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, sir, always a pleasure. Thanks for coming by.

    SEN. JOHNSON: I appreciate again, RonJohnsonForSenate.com. I have to add that in there. I need a lot of support.

    CLAY: We encourage everybody to go check out your website and support you as much as they can. Thank you, Senator.

    Recent Stories

    Zelensky Makes Emotional Appeal to Congress

    16 Mar 2022

    CLAY: Volodymyr Zelensky addressed Congress just a couple of hours ago and made his plea for as much American support as he could possibly get as the overall battle inside of Ukraine continues to grow in intensity. He spoke in English for a short part of that overall address. Here is Volodymyr Zelensky speaking in English.

    ZELENSKY: As the leader of my nation, I’m addressing President Biden. You are the leader of the nation of your great nation. I wish you to be the leader of the world. Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace. Thank you.

    CLAY: So, there’s no doubt now, Buck, that Zelensky is continuing to play the role — we talked about this last week — of the modern-day Churchill. He is going around and speaking to all these different countries. He just spoke to Canada. I believe he’s scheduled to speak to several other European countries. He’s already spoken last week to Boris Johnson Parliament in England. He spoke to Congress asking for as much support as he can possibly get. I don’t doubt that this will help his overall trajectory in terms of the amount of support the United States is going to give him; but do you believe anything changed in any kind of substantive way based on his address to Congress today, Buck?

    BUCK: Emotional appeal, that’s what it was, in front of the members of Congress assembled. There was a video — it was scored with, sad orchestral music, and they were showing horrific imagery of children missing legs and buildings being destroyed and this is all meant — this is all happening, and it is horrible, it is atrocious. This is meant to evoke an emotional response from us that we should think differently about what the U.S. role in this should be based upon the emotional appeal, right, based upon our sense of outraged morality. And I think we have to be very cautious about that.

    We all understand what’s going on here is terrible. The whole war should have been averted. I think that’s something that gets lost in this discussion. It was an enormous blunder and a miscalculation on the part of the NATO allies looking at this, the Biden administration looking at this. They really didn’t believe, I think, until the very end, until maybe the days or couple of weeks before that Putin was gonna go in. But put that aside for a moment.

    Clay, there’s already negotiations underway — this being widely reported on — about how to end the conflict, what would be necessary here in terms of concessions from Ukraine. Now, I understand that we want to side with and we do side with the aggrieved, assaulted party here, which is Ukraine. They’re being bullied, and they’re being massacred by a superior military force and a bigger, stronger country in a way that is horrific.
    But all of that said, the most important thing, I believe, is to bring this war to a conclusion, and there’s already a discussion about neutrality for Ukraine, would that be enough.

    Now, Ukraine, as I understand the negotiations — of course I’m not there — we have to rely on the reporting on this, right? You’re not in the room, I’m not in the room, but this is what Western news sources are reporting. Ukraine is saying no, we have to have guarantees, security guarantees and not just a promise of neutrality. But there’s already discussion about how to end this thing. Keep that in mind when we’re looking at now the ask from Zelensky — there’s two things. He wants a no-fly zone, clear the skies, which we’ve already discussed; the no-fly zone means shooting down Russian planes.

    CLAY: And it’s not seen, for everybody out there, that a no-fly zone is going to have the support in order to ever occur, at least with United States involvement or NATO involvement, right? It does not seem that that’s gonna happen.

    BUCK: Today, yes. I’m not sure ever, but I think today — that’s my concern. I mean, Clay, you’re right that right now, there is really a bipartisan agreement that we don’t — there is a bipartisan leadership consensus, but it has — this has been evolving day in and day out. The secondary ask was, well, if you won’t do that, give us more weapons. And now there’s discussion of sending the switchblade suicide drones, for example. I mean, it’s a suicide for the drone, not a person. But that those were used in Afghanistan, for example, and giving them more advanced surface-to-air missile systems so they could at least defend themselves better against these Russian strikes. Keep in mind a lot of what we’re seeing are Russian missile strikes, what we understand, and artillery. And a no-fly zone would be very limited. In the way you stop that with a no-fly zone, Clay, would be engaging targets on the ground, which means now our planes are blowing up things on the ground too.

    So this is how it gets much bigger, much faster as a point of U.S. military involvement. Will we give him additional tools? Yes, we’ve been giving them a lot. But I think the focus should be on trying to figure out what the negotiation could be here, what the final deal could be to end this, more so than this idea that Ukraine is gonna be able to — I still think you will think Ukraine is gonna be able to defeat Russia in this fight and kick them out of the country, and I don’t see that happening, and I don’t think anyone who’s following it very closely as a conflict sees that happen.

    CLAY: And then you can certainly understand the Ukrainian perspective, which is if we’re going to enter into some form of ceasefire, how do we have guarantees that we’re not going to get invaded again by Russia in a year or six months or two years? What is there that would make Vladimir Putin not actually do this?

    And look. They’ve already negotiated, they thought, for their own support historically. They gave up their nukes, they thought they were going to get the protection in the event that Russia ever invaded. And that’s the key, to me, is how in the world do you get an enforceable pact of nonaggression going forward from Russia? And can you trust anything that Vladimir Putin says in this arena? I don’t think you can, Buck. And so that raises the issue of, how do you ever end this conflict when there is no mutuality of trust that Vladimir Putin is going to accede to anything he agrees to today or tomorrow or in the near future for months or years into the future? It’s just not gonna happen. We can’t trust them.

    BUCK: There’s two parts of this, right? There’s the stopping the missiles and the bombs from falling right now to save as many lives as possible while we can; and I think what you’re getting to, Clay, is the reality of what things actually look like even after a ceasefire. Right now, I think there’s essentially no chance that you’re gonna have Russia agree to give back any of the territory. Forget about Crimea. That’s been officially part of Russia even though the international community rejects it, it’s been officially part of Russia for years. But everything that they’ve grabbed in the east, maybe even some of the stuff they’ve grabbed to the north much Kiev, the capital city, they may say, well, no, this is now a Russian protectorate. We need this for a strategic buffer, if you will, between a hostile state and us. And so what’s the difference between that and a forward operating base for further aggression against Ukraine in two years, in 10 years — who knows? — to take more of the country as a stronger, more powerful neighbor?

    So is that likely to happen? I think so. I think that that’s one of the big challenges here is. Even if there is a ceasefire and a promise of neutrality, it feels like this is just a phased consuming of the Ukrainian state by the Russian bear that is happening right now. It’s just a question of how much they do today, how much they’ll do in six months and in six years. But it all also comes back to, do we want to have a fight with Russia? Does the United States, do our NATO allies want to see how crazy Putin’s willing to be if he feels backed into a corner? And I think the answer is still, for those who understand what he could pull off and what he could try, this is not our fight, our troops should not be involved, our airmen and women should not be involved. Clay, that could change very quickly. Enough of these videos and enough these appeals.

    CLAY: Not only that, I mean, what in the world going forward is going to happen in terms of bringing Russia back into the global order. Again, the analogy that I would use historically, Buck, is, this feels a bit to me like the first Gulf War, where Saddam Hussein invades Kuwait, the United Nations, everybody comes together to kick him out of Kuwait, but he’s still in control. And so it’s just part and parcel of a longer story as opposed to some sort of official resolution.

    Obviously, the difference is Russia is gaining territory here whereas Iraq lost all of its territory. But Saddam Hussein remained in power and we ended up having a second part to that, which was second Gulf War. I don’t know that we’re going to get any sort of substantive resolution here because Putin, it appears, is going to remain in power, and how can you trust anything that he’s going to do after what we’ve seen over the last three weeks or so?

    BUCK: And it does feel like we’re entering a new Cold War that’s really a two-front Cold War.

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: We have Russia to deal with in the west, although of course Russia also stretches to the east, but Russia to deal with in the west and China to deal with in the east. China more economically at least right now, Russia more militarily, but the old Soviet Union may be gone, we’ve got some pretty massive challenges in geopolitics going forward in the West. It’s not gonna be the clear sailing many of us had hoped for, unfortunately.

    BREAK TRANSCRIPT

    SEN. KELLY: The first thing we would have to do is suppress the enemy air defenses; so we’d have to take out the Russian surface-to-air missile sites. And then as Russian airplanes are flying, you have to enforce the no-fly zone; so you have to shoot ’em down. And we can do that. But then we’re in a direct combat action with the Russian military. That means we are at war with Russia. And at this point I think it is in the best interests of everybody for us to avoid being at war with Russia. Russia has 6,000 nuclear warheads. We have 5,500. The support we’re giving Ukraine is effective.


    BUCK: Welcome back to Clay and Buck. That was Senator Mark Kelly on the no-fly zone. Yeah, it is best if we avoid a war with Russia. I think that is pretty clear. Let’s be very clear-eyed about this one. What is the worst possible outcome? I think that’s the worst possible outcome of all of the things that we are seeing; so we should do everything we can to avoid that. So then what other options are there?

    Well, congressional minority leader, Kevin McCarthy, says that we need to give Ukraine a mix of stuff so they can create their own no-fly zone.

    HOUSE MINORITY LEADER MCCARTHY: Thought President Zelensky was very powerful, many of you watched, made the case very strongly. You think about what President Biden should do, I think there’s a bipartisan movement right here, provide them the MiGs, provide them the planes where they can create a no-fly zone, provide them the armaments that they need to continue to fight a war that they did not create. I thought the video was one of the most moving moments and made cases of the murdering of innocent people, that war crimes are being committed, that America and world cannot sit by and ignore.

    BUCK: Clay, this is where we may see a change in sentiment. A few days ago it was giving planes could be seen as an escalation. And people argue, well, we’re already giving them shoulder-fired missiles and what’s the difference. Well, it’s like f you were to give your neighbor a rifle to fight off a home invasion versus I guess giving them a bazooka, I mean, there are different levels of military assistance and involvement that one could point to. To be fair, it’s lethal aid either way; so I see this. Do you think we’re gonna give them planes?

    CLAY: It seems like there is a building consensus towards giving them the planes. I mean, when I watched the Zelensky discussion, Buck, what immediately comes to mind — remember early on when he said this may be the last time that you see me alive, and there was this idea that Russia was going to capture and assassinate Zelensky?

    BUCK: Yep.

    CLAY: That seems to have completely disappeared, the idea that he’s going to be captured and assassinated, such that you know the technology and the search capabilities better than most, but when you’re addressing Congress and you’re talking to world leaders all over the place, there has to be a degree of confidence that somebody’s not suddenly going to bomb where you are or there’s not going to be an assassin squad that suddenly shows up while you’re in the middle of an event like this.

    He hasn’t left Kiev, to our knowledge, and so I wonder to what extent there is some sort of agreement — tell me if you think I’m crazy on this — that his safety is not now as paramount of a concern as it appeared to be in the first few days of this invasion. Does that make sense? I mean, when I see him doing all these — all these interviews and all these discussions everywhere, it doesn’t seem to me like he is terrified that at any moment he’s going to be killed.

    BUCK: You’re hearing less about it, to be sure, and there is a lot of what really felt bike war propaganda coming from all directions in the early days of the conflict. I’d say this, though. What really has to be assessed here is enhancing the capabilities of the Ukrainians to punch back against the Russians, specifically with planes, does that prolong or shorten the conflict so that we get to a negotiation and an end to actual hostilities? I think there’s an assumption that it would make the Russians come to the table faster. We’ll have to see.

    Recent Stories

    Dr. Marty Makary on the Mistakes the Covid Experts Made

    16 Mar 2022

    CLAY: We are joined now as we roll through the first hour of the Wednesday edition of the program by Dr. Marty Makary of Johns Hopkins University. He’s the author of The Price We Pay. He also has got a grace piece up: 10 Biggest Covid Mistakes: Americans Deserve an Apology from the Medical Experts. It’s linked at ClayandBuck.com, and FoxNews.com. You can check it out there. Dr. Makary, appreciate you joining us. I read your piece this morning. Really well done.

    What is your take on — we said we were gonna talk about it in a little bit, but the Senate actually voted on mask mandates on airplanes, and Mitt Romney was the only Republican. I believe there were eight different Democratic senators, many of them in tight reelection races, that also voted, 57 total, to do away with the airplane mandates. Why in the world does that mandate still exist? Is it totally and completely illogical?

    DR. MAKARY: I think it is. I think that we have now the data that we should have gotten on day one of the pandemic on cloth masks. And really what protects people is the ventilation in the airplane, and some people just don’t want to accept that, and if you want to wear a mask forever for the rest of your life, then you’ll say we need to wear masks now because we’re at about the lowest numbers we’re going to be.

    We’re going to fester at these low numbers off and on forever. People are getting depressed. They’re sad when they’re wearing a mask. We’re losing the human connection. And we just got data that the isolation that the pandemic has promoted has increased the rates of heart disease and stroke by 30% and increased dementia by 50%. So we gotta accept a little bit of risk on covid to try to alleviate the harm we’re seeing outside of covid.

    BUCK: Listen, Dr. Makary, can you just hit that again? ‘Cause I hadn’t seen or heard that. I think people really do need to hear this. We’ve seen what percent increases in heart attack and stroke during the pandemic?

    DR. MAKARY: Yeah. So this is a study, ironically, data that came from the CDC; so just recognize the real numbers may be twice as high, but they reported that the effect of isolation during the pandemic resulted in a 29% increase in heart disease, 32% increase in stroke, and a 50% increase in dementia. People are losing their minds.

    BUCK: So locking people away is dramatically increasing their possibility of death from a whole range of factors? That is from the CDC’s own data?

    DR. MAKARY: That’s right. And it’s something that scientists are not honest about is that we’ve lost about a hundred thousand Americans a year above what we normally lose in our death tolls because noncovid mortality, what we call excess noncovid deaths. Nobody’s talking about that. That is something that you don’t see in Sweden which, by the way, all in all has a far lower fatality rate per capita than the United States.

    BUCK: Dr. Marty Makary. Dr. Makary, I also want to know what you think when you hear the CEO of Pfizer, Bourla, say that they’re calling for emergency authorization for a fourth shot, meaning the second booster shot, and even Fauci now says, yeah, it might have to be shots forever. I mean, are these people just utterly shameless? Because I remember when even last summer when people like me and Clay and others were saying, guys, it’s gonna be shots for every year for the rest of your life if they get their way with it. I mean, do you feel like there’s any contrition from within the medical community, the people that push this kind of stuff and now have realized it wasn’t what they said it would be?

    DR. MAKARY: Well, a lot of doctors are frustrated that a company executive now is basically taking the functional role as the director of the United States CDC. And Dr. Fauci and Dr. Walensky are playing passive. We started to see that when Omicron came about in South Africa, Walensky and Fauci, the NIH, all took a very passive role, and the companies did the experiments, not the United States laboratories and the government, the companies, the pharma industry did the experiments and said, we have data telling you that you should get another shot, and they just parroted — without seeing the underlying data — just repeated that. A lot of people are frustrated, and I think if it were up to the shareholders of Pfizer we might be getting a shot every Monday morning when we show up to work.

    CLAY: Dr. Makary, in your 10 things that we got wrong, meaning the public health experts, what do you think was the biggest failure? When I read your list, to me it’s shutting down the schools. Was there a bigger failure, in your mind, than that?

    DR. MAKARY: Well, I’ll tell you one that’s just close to my heart, because I’m a surgeon who has been with people at the end of life at the bedside in the ICU, and the way that we shut out loved ones from saying good-bye to their family members was a human rights violation that spanned most of the pandemic and all the hospitals were complicit as the establishment did nothing. That was one of the most cruel practices this country inflicted on its own citizens.

    BUCK: Dr. Makary, are you having more and more people from within the medical community reach out to you. It’s at this point even more important I would think than them saying “you’re right” is saying that they will not allow this to happen again, they recognize that masking up between bites on airplanes is a moronic, anti-scientific policy that was instituted, that masking up children in schools was an idiotic, unscientific policy that was really child abuse on a massive scale. Are there other doctors — there were not a lot of you, MDs with real credentials who would come forward and speak obvious truths. Are you gonna be the lone man shouting from the mountaintop the next time, Doc, or are there gonna be others standings alongside you?

    DR. MAKARY: I think a lot of other doctors now feel empowered. They’ve seen that they’ve gotta speak up. You know, I got a lot of secret praise from doctors around the country, and a bunch of us who spoke up did. We took a big risk because universities and medical societies, journals bully and threaten people who speak up about their opinion different from the establishment. But we’re all proud of our medical profession, and we’re seeing our credibility now in the toilet, and that’s why doctors are speaking up now and they’re coming around.

    CLAY: I’m reading right now the Washington Post, Dr. Makary. They have a headline: A Covid Surge in Western Europe as U.S. Bracing for Another Wave. Right now obviously the numbers are down quite low in the United States as the Omicron variant seems to have burned out. Do you expect to see these continuing waves in the future, maybe even this one connected to Western Europe? There has oftentimes been a connection between what happens in Western Europe and what happens in the United States.

    DR. MAKARY: Yeah, the U.K. has been a pretty reliable preview of what we can expect. And what they’re seeing is an uptick. I wouldn’t call it a wave. I don’t think it’s going to be a wave. What they’re seeing is that the BA2 sort of second variant version of Omicron, is causing some infection out there, even in people who had Omicron in the past. And so what they’re noticing is an uptick especially in the southern region where the vaccination rates in older people — those vaccines may not be holding up very well. I think we’re gonna see ebbs and flows for a long time. And I can guarantee you covid’s gonna take a bump-up in the fall because it’s now one of the regular respiratory viruses we’re gonna see every winter, every viral season.

    BUCK: Dr. Makary, are you confident that we believe never go — and when I say “we,” I mean anywhere, including places like New York, Los Angeles — we will not go back into lockdown again? Is that — is there a consequences even if it’s a quiet one on lockdowns were disastrous with little to no benefit?

    DR. MAKARY: Unfortunately, I don’t think there’s a consensus. I mean, look at the study out of Hopkins on lockdowns. It was very elegant, very sophisticated, my colleagues did it. And it was basically blown off by a part of the country that didn’t want to hear it. Here we had the largest public health intervention in human history, that is the lockdowns. And people are not even interested in studying the impact of it. There’s probably no better comparison than comparing Sweden and Michigan, identical in population, identical in their age and age distribution, yet Sweden had double the deaths of Michigan. We’ve gotta learn our lessons, and unfortunately I think some parts of the country are not interested in the data.

    CLAY: Dr. Makary, what would you tell us we should know? For everybody out there who is following the storylines, what’s next? I mean, we’re right now, today is the anniversary of “15 days to slow the spread.” It’s now been 730 days, two full years since “15 days to slow the spread.” What’s next? How does this continue?

    DR. MAKARY: Well, I think the thing that we’ve never accepted as a country that we still need to accept is that there’s a 1,000- to 10,000-fold difference in the risk to people who are vulnerable and older versus people who are younger and healthier. We’ve never talked about obesity as a risk factor. We’ve gotta get people active, healthy, we’ve gotta talk about food as medicine, and we’ve got to start recognizing risk cannot be eliminated. We’ve gotta learn to live with it because it’s gonna be here forever, which means every viral season we’re gonna see a bump-up. You gotta use common sense precautions. If you’re sick, stay home. If you’ve been exposed, stay your distance. And if you’re around someone vulnerable, be careful. That’s true of all respiratory pathogens. At this point, influenza is as or more dangerous than covid, according to the new Financial Times analysis that just came out. We’ve gotta learn to live with all these viral pathogens.

    BUCK: Dr. Marty Makary of Johns Hopkins University Medical Center, author of The Price We Pay, he’s got a piece up at ClayandBuck.com, 10 Biggest Covid Mistakes: Americans Deserve an Apology from the Medical Experts. Dr. Makary, always appreciate the expertise, sir. Thank you.

    DR. MAKARY: Great to be with you guys. Thanks.

    Recent Stories

    The 2-Year Anniversary of 15 Days to Slow the Spread

    16 Mar 2022

    BUCK: “15 days to slow the spread.” Clay, I remember this, but I didn’t remember it as well as I thought I did. First of all, we’ve talked so much about Fauci. There was Dr. Birx.

    CLAY: Oh, yeah.

    BUCK: — who was, you know, run off into obscurity because she did the whole everyone should mask and not see their family members for Thanksgiving. But, I mean, I’m gonna go see my family members for Thanksgiving. And at that point I think ’cause maybe she was around for the Trump administration, she hadn’t attached herself enough like a barnacle to the Biden vessel. So she decided to get out of there.

    But I want to remind everybody, two years ago I believe to the day today.

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: — here is what she said about “15 days to slow the spread.”

    BIRX: We’re saying that same sense of community to come together and stand up against this virus. And if everybody in America does what we ask for over the next 15 days, we will see a dramatic difference and we won’t have to worry about the ventilators and we won’t have to worry about the ICU beds because we won’t have our elderly and our people at the greatest risk having to be hospitalized.

    BUCK: Completely wrong. The initial promise here was just give us 15 days, it’ll just be 15 days and you’ll see a dramatic improvement. The 15 days turned into what, how many months, effectively two years?

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: But 15 days turned into two years, and there was no benefit, Clay.

    CLAY: No benefit —

    BUCK: — whatsoever.

    CLAY: No benefit at all, Buck. Do you remember how slow all of those days seemed back during March of 2020 during that “15 days to slow the spread”? It felt like March of 2020 lasted like 10 years and then April to — and unfortunately where I was by mid- to late April we were basically back to normal.

    But I remember going to a restaurant and I remember having a conversation and, by the way, this is still a conversation you could have because there are more covid cases now even today than there were in March of 2020 when we shut down, at least that we know about. And I remember going into a restaurant and the restaurant owner there saying, “I’m so glad to be opening back up,” but he said, “There’s way more cases now when the state of Tennessee is opening back up than there were when we shut down.” And that didn’t get talked about enough because what the when Fauci used to walk out all the time, Buck, and he would always make his hands and he would say what we’re trying to do is avoid a peak and kind of spread the plateau out.

    BUCK: Oh, gosh. He was like one of these weatherman who stands in front of the green screen, you know (impression) “If you do what I say you’ll hit a plateau through mitigation. We don’t want to see a surge so we could sigh a drop-off if mitigation measures are something that we all could collectively admit to with the droplets.” I remember all this. He was wrong.

    CLAY: On everything.

    BUCK: — every single time. This guy was wrong all the time, and libs were obsessed with him.

    CLAY: Isn’t it crazy? Because I just sent out a tweet about this ’cause I — that Fauci’s nowhere to be seen on this two-year anniversary. This was the beginning of Dr. Fauci as the throw pillow is it I think Gretchen Whitmer, right, Buck, the governor of Michigan has, like, a Fauci throw pillow, there’s all these people who are still enamored with Fauci. And what’s wild is, he’s gone — like, where is he? Wouldn’t you think on a two-year anniversary here that there would be some interview that he was doing or some retrospective that would be talked about?

    The Biden administration — I don’t know if you buy into this as much as I do, Buck — I think the Biden administration is leaning so hard into the Ukraine story because it distracts from all the disasters going on with domestic policy. I’m not sure whether it’s gonna impact things in terms of Biden’s overall popularity, but that story is a far better one to be telling than the covid mess, than the murder rate skyrocketing, than inflation at probably double digits by the time we got analysis in March. And so they’re leaning into this. But Fauci is just vanished. I mean, it’s kind of crazy to me that there aren’t retrospective stories being done today on the two-year anniversary of “15 days to slow the spread.”

    BUCK: I think more than anything else he just has gone beyond his political usefulness expiration date.

    CLAY: Well, that’s certainly true.

    BUCK: He’s not even getting the invitations, I’m sure. I think everyone needs to be clear on this. It’s not that Fauci and those like him, but Fauci of his always really in a class by himself, and he was a little megalomaniac, never once showed contrition, never once said, guys, we got this wrong, we really need to take the politics out of this, this is about getting it right. It was always (impression), “Be scared, listen to me, I’ve got more things to say about how you can’t live normally yet.” That was every single time. He somehow managed — and this was always the tell, this was always the giveaway. He never said anything in two years, not once did he really upset the MSNBC-watching, Brooklyn and northwest D.C. crowd that loves all this stuff and thought that, oh, my gosh. Two masks and I take it so seriously and the whole thing. Never upset them. They were his constituency. He was really the high priest, really the pope of a religion that he created around covid, and now he’s not even getting the invitations from CNN.

    He’s not even being asked, I can guarantee you, to appear to talk in these places because, what are they gonna say? The vaccine program worked so well to stop the spread? We hit all-time highs, after a vaccine mandate ripped this country apart, after Joe Biden ran around talking about a pandemic of the unvaccinated and how they were a threat to other people, here’s the reality. Their promise that if you got the shot you’d be done was a lie. And in some ways even worse than that, their demand that you get the shot or else you’re a threat to other people was also a lie because whether you got the shot or not, you were spreading it all over the place.

    CLAY: Totally true. And you pointed this out, and it is so incredible, not once in two years did Fauci ever say, “This is too much.” When they went and filled up all of the people who like to skateboard in California, when they filled up the skateboard parks with sand, did you not say it was too much. When they put crime scene tape around playgrounds for young kids, when they arrested a guy on a paddleboard out in the ocean, hen they shut down every trail and park all over the state of California, when they wouldn’t allow you to go outside, never did Fauci come out and say, hey, you know what? We got this wrong.

    And Marty Makary, be who we talked to in the first hour, Buck, in his piece points out, how much time did Fauci spend telling people, “Hey, you need to, like, Lysol all your mail and Lysol everything that comes into your house,” when he was continuing to spread the idea that covid was something that was living on objects and would spread that way, as opposed to all the evidence supporting the fact that it was aerosol.

    BUCK: Clay, we were forced to obey the dictates of the psychologically destabilized masses because Anthony Fauci and those around him gave a veneer of scientific credibility to this, when it was obvious that this was absurd. And beyond that, there has been a vindictiveness now that you’re seeing. And it certainly is the case here in New York City. You know, New York there’s still — you asked — we talked about this — I don’t even really know what the exact —

    CLAY: I’m not sure if I’m allowed to come into the studio. That’s why I was asking, like, if I’m in New York.

    BUCK: New York City still has an employer vaccine mandate in place. Like, no one’s going out and getting the shot right now, obviously. No one really — I mean, very, very, very few people, no one really — except for the people, like, “I want my eighth shot, I need another shot, where’s my next shot,” people get all excited about this like it’s gonna — it doesn’t make you Superman. You can’t fly after you get covid shot number nine. But there are people that act like that.

    But here we are in New York City. I think there are two things happening. One is that they want — if you were living in New York and you had managed to get this far, which you wouldn’t ’cause you wouldn’t have been able groceries — yeah — but if you were living here, they — and managed to go this far without complying with the vaccine mandate, they want to continue to punish those people at some level because the employer mandate is the one where they really have the most leverage.

    So they want to continue to agitate and punish people, but beyond this — this is why I was asking Dr. Makary about whether there’s been a real change in sentiment from the medical community — they’re leaving in place the structure of ramping it up again.

    CLAY: Yeah.

    BUCK: They’re leaving — okay. We’ll leave the employer mandate in place as long as we can, and then it will come back in the fall. What do you mean? No big deal. Just like the measles, mumps, rubella shot or the flu shot, they’re going to say. This is what they’re gonna be telling us, which is why, as we said, it’s not over.

    Recent Stories