×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Former AG Bill Barr Sits Down to Talk with Buck

17 Mar 2022

BUCK: I am now joined by the former attorney general under President Trump and attorney general once before that as well, also author of One Damn Thing After Another, which is already a big best-seller. It’s available now, if want to go pick it up, get your copy of it. Bill Barr, good to see you.

BARR: Great to be here, Buck.

BUCK: So you already made news earlier today. You talked on Fox about the Afghanistan withdrawal from the Biden administration and how you think that that created a pathway, a green light, a perception among Putin and his top advisers about Ukraine. Tell us more about this.

BARR: Yeah, well, his — Putin’s red line has always been he doesn’t want NATO right on the border of Russia; so he didn’t want Ukraine going in to NATO. But there was no urgency about that. It wasn’t as if that was gonna happen anytime soon.

And I felt after Biden won the election that Putin would decide he didn’t need to negotiate, he could take what he wanted under Biden. And then when there was Afghanistan — and I put that in my book — and then when Afghanistan occurred, I think that, you know, crystallized Putin’s view that this guy was weak.

BUCK: How do you think it’s been handled since invasion, since the tanks rolled in into Ukraine from the Biden point of view, the diplomacy, all of that?

BARR: Well, it’s hard to say since the tanks rolled in because he should have been putting these — the weaponry in before the tanks roll — we knew that this was a big risk of him moving in, and the name of the game was deterrence, but he didn’t put the weapons in at that point. That would have made Putin stop, if the MiGs had been transferred and weapons had been transferred.

Now, since the invasion I think generally he’s been doing the right thing in terms of arming and supplying Ukrainians and rallying NATO support, although sometimes it’s NATO rallying our support. We always seem to be half a step behind.

BUCK: And I wanted to ask you about election integrity because we got a midterm coming up here. Democrats are not looking like they’re in a good spot. That’s based on every poll that anybody could point to and see.

People still have very intense feelings, as you know, about the last election and going forward there should be some questions that are answered about what either went wrong or could go wrong the next time around, went wrong that time, could go wrong the next time.

What are the biggest challenges that you see it as the former attorney general and somebody who was right on the forefront of this issue to an election in this midterm that people can say, it’s not perfect, but it’s good enough that we can have full faith in it?

BARR: Well, I feel there are really two issues. One issue is — and I stress this from my confirmation hearing all the way through — we’re a very divided country. All we have going for us is peaceful transfer of power through elections. And if we lose confidence in that we’re in a very bad spot.

So everything has to be done to ensure the integrity of the election. In my opinion the Democrats throughout the country have been reckless and irresponsible because they essentially have been pushing for elections on the honor system. And I believe we should have — the fact of the matter is unless you have the system in place at the time of the election, it’s hard to come back afterward and find the fraud and have a remedy.

And so I am all for stepping up all the integrity measures we can, stopping this idea that we should roll back or dilute these measures, because if you do, people won’t have confidence in the election. Whether or not you can prove fraud, they will not have confidence.

Now, as you know, on this particular election, I did not see evidence, and I’m fairly confident that there was not fraud at the — at the level that would have affected the outcome of the election. But that does not mean that we should not step up all the efforts we can to make sure they’re fair.

BUCK: Speaking to former attorney general Bill Barr. The book, One Damn Thing After Another is out now, for those of you who want to hear — or read, rather, more about what it was to be the attorney general under President Trump, what he had to deal with. And I want to ask you. You came into the center of the storm on Russia collusion. You came in when that was already a maelstrom meant to harm the Trump administration in every way possible.

It is beyond any doubt that this was rooted in lies, that this was false intelligence launder through the top reaches of the government and — you know, we can’t — I can’t get into everything now. People know listening about all the things happening here, the media working with the deep state and all this. Are we ever gonna get a full accounting for what happened in your own mind? I know there’s still the Durham investigation underway. Is this something that the American people should think standpoint we’ll really know the full extent of what happened?

BARR: Yes, I think he will get to the bottom of what happened, as well as humanly possible to get the evidence and lay it out for the American people. I mean, that’s one of the reasons I was persuaded ultimately to come in to the administration. I had been attorney general before, and it wasn’t that attractive a proposition to me, to be frank. But I felt we were heading toward a constitutional crisis. I was very skeptical of this whole Russiagate thing from the beginning. And what you say is right. It was a dirty trick. It was a sham. And I never felt there was a predication for investigating the Trump campaign. And I felt very soon that the real issue is how did this damn thing get started? And that’s why I appointed Durham, to get to the bottom of it.

Now, you know, Durham didn’t have the benefit of the inspector general’s report until the end of 2019, and then we had covid; so it hasn’t been as fast as I wanted, and it’s frustrating. But there’s no doubt in my mind he’ll get to the bottom of it. And if there’s charges to be brought, I think he’ll bring them.

BUCK: Was it even beyond your expectations as a dirty trick once you were inside of government at the top level of law enforcement, the attorney general, got to see and experience and be around what was going on then — I think it’s hard for people to imagine from the outside what it must be like to be the attorney general when there’s essentially a soft coup attempt underway from a collusion, a real collusion between the media, some elements of the federal bureaucracy, and the Democrat Party and the Hillary campaign all at once.

BARR: That’s right. You know, I came in — or, you know, we had had eight years of Obama administration. Taking over an agency after that certainly the complexion of the agency had changing since the last time when I took over after Reagan. But, yeah, I was shocked at the lack of basis for the FBI action. And to me it’s inexplicable — for example, you know, the dossier came from somebody who had been suspected and investigated of being a Russian agent. And that had never been resolved. And yet they seemed to take the dossier and run with it. Never went back to check on it. So I was shocked at the lack of basis for the FBI’s conduct.

BUCK: Just wondering if you have any thoughts as somebody who knows the D.C. and federal legal and judiciary circuit quite well, nominee for the Supreme Court committee Ketanji Brown Jackson. What do you think?

BARR: You know, I think she’ll be just what the progressive wing of the Democratic Party could hope — everything they could hope for in a nominee. She’ll bevery much over on the left.

BUCK: Is it kind of sad to watch the Supreme Court become so — I mean, people always say, “It’s not political!
And then they have a political argument about it.

BARR: Yes.

BUCK: I think it’s unserious at this phase now to pretend that it hasn’t become at some level an instrument of politics. Do you think we ever get back from that?

BARR: I hope that the conservative majority takes us back from that, but you’re right. That’s where it was headed. And I think that is essentially the view of the left, which it’s a super legislature that should, you know, take their bearings from the zeitgeist and impose their will, but I think because of our conservative majority, I think we can pull back from that.

BUCK: Former attorney general, Bill Barr. The book, One Damn Thing After Another. Go check it out for yourself. Bill, thanks so much for being here. Good to see you.

BARR: Thanks, Buck.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Joe Kinsey on Lia Thomas and OutKick’s Woke Brackets

17 Mar 2022

CLAY: I bet our guest now, who is one of the great writers at OutKick.com, Joe Kinsey will probably be having a few beers. What’s your beer of choice on St. Patrick’s Day, Joe?

KINSEY: Ah, Guinness. I’m just a Guinness guy. Love Guinness. Give me a Guinness on draft, a lot of head on it, Clay, and I’ll suck those down all right.

CLAY: Careful with the word choice there. All right. We got a woke bracket that is up at OutKick that you have done an incredible job on. We’re gonna get to that in a moment.

But first your writing this morning on the situation with the transgender Penn swimmer who had a three-second win in the 500. This story still not being covered very much in the world of sports because it proves that a biological man who decides to become a woman has a substantial competitive advantage, at least based on the results so far. I believe the Penn transgender swimmer, this biological male, won by three seconds in the 500 prelims. What can you tell us about the latest on this story and where it’s headed?

KINSEY: Well, Clay, we have Lia Thomas, the transgender Penn swimmer, as you said, he swam a 4:33.82, and that — yes. It was three seconds faster than the next — the next qualifier, Erica Sullivan. We have a situation that is now the fastest time in the 500 freestyle in the nation this season, even faster than Brooke Forde – Pat Forde, who is Sports Illustrated writer, faster than his daughter who won, Clay. She won a silver medal at the Olympics in August for the 4×200 freestyle team for the United States.

So not only is Lia Thomas dominating the swimming, Lia Thomas is beating Olympic silver medalist, Clay. That is where we’re at. We’re headed into the final tonight at 6 PM, and Lia Thomas — if it stands as it stands now, it’s gonna be a question if she breaks the — he, he — breaks the pool record and wins the national title.

CLAY: Yeah, what is that nobody be number, what is the pool record, like, how close is it to being broken?

KINSEY: The pool record is 4:30.81. We’re talking three seconds. This was the qualifier, you know, this wasn’t leave it all in the pool. So three seconds, could come down tonight. I mean, we could be talking about a new pool record for the NCAA championships.

BUCK: So just to be very clear, Joe, I don’t follow swimming in general at the NCAA level; so when you say pool record, is it, then, possible that tonight at I think 6 Eastern they have the 500 freestyle national championships, right. Tonight you could have a transgender female hold the all-time record for the NCAA for the 500 meter freestyle swim, right? So is it possible that it wouldn’t just be this year, it would be number one all time?

KINSEY: So Lia Thomas would have to beat Katie Ledecky, you know, the most decorated women’s female swimming champion of all time who has a 4:24. That is the NCAA record. Lia Thomas would have to beat a 4:24.06. So is it possible? Well, Lia Thomas just swam the fastest time in the nation, and it could fall tonight. We could see an all-time record and a pool record and national championship. So, yeah, I don’t think it’s out of the question.

BUCK: And what of some of the other women — one of the things I know you at OutKick and Clay and I have been talking about here, as you guys have been covering the story, is that there’s this fear of women who are actually biological women who are swimming against Lia Thomas, and they understand this is biochemically unfair and kind of outrageous to them, but they’re worried about speaking out.

I mean, are there more people that are coming forward right now, you think? Are they willing to speak to the press more about this? Or are they gonna wait until Lia Thomas becomes perhaps the national champion and then there will be more outcry? How do you see that playing out?

KINSEY: Well, we know that Brooke Forde who is entering the finals in the sixth place position, we know through her father who released a statement in January who said, “I’m perfectly fine with this. Whatever happens, happens.” Well, here’s what happens. You are an Olympic champion who is now going to lose, as it stands right now, Brooke Forde will lose a national championship to a guy. And Pat Forde, the Sports Illustrated writer, he is on record that he understands this is an unfair playing field here.

But there’s they’re so far down the woke — you know, they’ve jumped in so deep in the woke world — that they can’t now speak out about it because then they’re gonna lose their street cred, Buck. You know, they’re in this tough situation now where Pat Forde has to watch his daughter lose to prove a point. And now Pat Forde is saying these are all politically driven, these are political people that are making this a problem.

Well, Pat, your daughter is about to lose, you know. You know it’s a problem, and you’re unwilling to speak out about it; so, you know what? You almost deserve to lose, right?

CLAY: Joe, what’s crazy, too, is this Penn transgender swimmer says that the plan is to become a member of the 2024 women’s Olympic team. So this story, for people out there who are saying, okay, well, I don’t really care that much — and some of you may not care that much about a biological man dominating women’s swimming in college, it’s a possibility that in a couple of years this Penn transgender swimmer could be taking away an Olympic position from a biological woman and competing as a woman at the Olympics. This is full on woke insanity, right? I mean, there’s no other way to describe this.

KINSEY: Clay, as long as these numbers continue, Lia Thomas will be an Olympic swimmer for the United States swimming team. This is not some farfetched reality. This is what’s gonna happen if these times maintain — you know, if Lia Thomas maintains these times, Lia Thomas will be on the Olympic team. Lia Thomas will take a biological female spot-on the Olympic team.

BUCK: We’re speaking to Joe Kinsey of OutKick.com. He’s got a story up on Lia Thomas smashing the records, the times of biological females in the NCAA swimming championship preliminary rounds.

Joe, to the point about the Olympics, one thing Clay and I have been talking about is how once this starts to be, you know, look, NCAA swimming is obviously no money in it or I don’t — maybe you can sell your identity — not identity. You know what I mean.

CLAY: I think that’s already happened.

BUCK: That’s a different thing. You know, you can sell your image and likeness. That’s what I was trying to think of, but in general there’s no money in swimming.

But when you get to gold metals and when you get to Olympic medalists, I’ve seen assessments that say that that’s worth seven figures to people in terms of endorsements and speaking engagements, et cetera. So how does the International Olympic Committee treat this situation? I mean, do we know what are the rules about someone like Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer, competing for actual medals at an actual Olympics?

KINSEY: Well, Buck, they’ve been rewriting the legislation and they’ve got pages and pages of you gotta go through this process and you gotta prove this and you gotta go before the doctors. And, let’s face it, Buck. Everything that they’ve written this year as far as legislation, none of it is going to stop Lia Thomas from competing for a spot on that team, none of it, Buck. Because Lia Thomas came out a week or two ago and said, listen. I am gonna go back and go get a law degree or something like that, I guess, and I am gonna train for the Olympics. And this is not gonna stop Lia Thomas.

There’s nothing that the U.S. Olympic team that has put forward to stop a transgender swimmer from competing in the London games. And that is where this is headed. We are seeing the early stages of what is setting up for one of the most insane stories in Olympic history.

CLAY: You mentioned — and I want to get to this ’cause I think people will love it — the amount of American sports media that is woke is like — what do you think, Joe? You’ve been doing this for a long time — 95%? If you were analyzing people in sports media, what percentage of them do you think voted Biden over Trump?

KINSEY. Oh, my God. It’s easily into the nineties. And I would have to say into the mid-nineties. Clay, we have very few instances where we know of blue checkmarks that aren’t in the woke world.

CLAY: I’m one of the few, right? I’m one of the few who’s actually come out and said I was willing to vote for Trump. The reason I bring this up with you, Joe, is because you mention the Pat Forde who I believe writes now at Sports Illustrated. His daughter is an Olympian which is an incredible accomplishment. She may lose her chance to win an NCAA championship to a guy, and Pat Forde is in some way defending this.

And he is a part — you’ve done this as a second year in a row where we have a woke sports media bracket challenge — for people out there who like to do bracket voting and have fun with it, you’ve got 20 different woke sports media brackets. Last year Jemele Hill, who memorably called the president a white supremacist and got to keep working at ESPN, she won. So we’ve pulled her out of the ranks, but this is pretty entertaining. 20 different people all competing for the title of OutKick’s woke bracket challenge winner.

KINSEY: Clay, this — this has become my calling card. You know, the readers request it, they want the bracket, they want the woke All-Star challenge. Listen. We had trouble coming up with number one seeds, there were so many people that could have been a number one seed in this bracket. We have Rex Chapman, your buddy. He’s you know, he’s one of the craziest.

CLAY: You even know these guys. Listen to the one seeds. Rex Chapman who is insufferable on social media. We’ve got Keith Olbermann, who you texted me this morning, is trying to steal somebody else’s show at MSNBC.

BUCK: Yep. He’s a true lunatic.

CLAY: Darren Rovell, who covers sports media and business and has turned into an insane man over covid. He wears, like, 40 different masks a day. And then we’ve got Mina Kimes, who has got into a woke battle. So people love this. I mean, you even, Buck, I think will enjoy it. So we have oddsmakers putting up lines, breaking down the matchup, and then we just let everybody vote for it, and people flood in like crazy to read Joe’s breakdown.

KINSEY: Yes. Clay, the thing about the woke challenge is, is we have competitors that I think love the woke challenge and they’re trying to win it, Clay. They really want to win this. Keith Olbermann, he went nuts this week. He wants to win this, Clay. This is what it’s all about. They want to prove how woke they are, and this is one of the ways they do it.

BUCK: There’s no such thing as too woke to the woke. That’s what you have to remember. They can always be crazier, and it sounds like, gentleman, they’re gonna try to prove it.

CLAY: Yeah, so go check it out. Joe, we appreciate the time. OutKick.com, people can go check out the woke bracket, they can follow you @JoeKinseyEXP, I’ll tweet out your handle if people are interested and they can stay updated as well. Joe, appreciate the time. Enjoy the games, and enjoy St. Patrick’s Day, bud.

KINSEY: See you, guys.

Recent Stories

Trump Right Again! Lesley Stahl Tried to Shut Down the Hunter Story

17 Mar 2022

CLAY: We’re talking about a major acknowledgment that the Hunter Biden laptop was actually real. Oh, yeah, all of you knew that that was true, ’cause you actually have functional brains. The New York Post broke the story 18 months ago.

But now the New York Times writing about the Hunter Biden investigation confirms that all of the emails are real, and this was a question that Donald Trump — chalk up another one that President Trump was right about — was demanding why 60 Minutes was not investigating this.

This was Trump with Lesley Stahl. This was his conversation just a couple of weeks, if I remember correctly, before the election. Listen to this.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Take a look at what’s going on, Lesley. And then you say that —

STAHL: I think…

PRESIDENT TRUMP: It’s the biggest scandal out there, Lesley.

STAHL: And you think it’s the biggest issue to campaign on?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I think it’s — I think it’s one of the biggest scandals I’ve ever seen, and you don’t cover it. You won’t talk about it.

STAHL: Well, because it can’t be verified —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: You want to talk about insignificant things.

STAHL: I’m telling you —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Of course it can be verified. Excuse me. They found the laptop. Lesley, listen.

STAHL: Can’t be verified.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: What can’t be verified?

STAHL: The laptop.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Why do you say that? Even the family has — the family, on the laptop, he’s gone into hiding. For five days he’s gone into hiding.

STAHL: He’s preparing for your debate.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Oh, it’s taken him five days to prepare. I doubt it. I doubt it.

BUCK: Was that all aired originally? I feel like that was some of the full interview ’cause I think that edited that. I remember hearing a different — am I crazy in thinking that was even more extensive there? She just did the, “No, we can’t verify it,” the last time around.

CLAY: Yeah, the Trump people — and I would encourage every Republican that’s running for significant office that’s being covered by the media, what Trump did is they recorded that 60 Minute interview themselves, instead of just letting 60 Minutes record what they wanted Trump to be saying and play it as a part of their interview, they recorded the whole thing.

And there’s so much dishonesty in media now that I would encourage — and, by the way, it’s not just politicians.
If you’re listening right now and you’re running a company and somebody from the media is going to interview you on a variety of different subjects, I’d do this. I — Buck, I’ll do either live, hey, you want to have me on live, boom, everything that I say goes out or I’m recording every single thing that we say.

I did this most recently when the Washington Post tried to blow me up. Of course they came after me. This was right before the election in 2020. They had to issue corrections on the quotes because I transcribed. I had the entire thing taped, and I had a court stenographer transcribing it. We do it for this show. I don’t trust the media. And I wouldn’t tell you you should. But that’s another thing. Trump is right.

BUCK: Wait, wait. One more thing on this, Clay, real quick. Notice how they’re willing to pretend that they’re really stupid when it serves their needs. Dumber than they actually are in the media. It can’t be verified. What does that mean? First of all, you’re journalists. It’s your job to verify it. Of course it can be verified.

And this would be like saying, it needs more study. We’ll never know the real motives. You know, you’ve got a guy who has a confession that he makes a video before he goes and, you know, kills somebody. We’ll never know the real motive. Maybe he changed his mind afterwards. Maybe he was posed by a demon. I mean, this is them pretending to be — Lesley Stahl pretending that she’s an utter moron because it was before an election and they needed to make this story go away.

CLAY: And this was around the time that OutKick went to the White House. It’s October 20th, 2020, that that 60 Minutes interviewed occurred. We were there right around that same time doing an interview of Trump right outside the Oval Office there. And the amount of lies that he dealt with in the 2020 campaign and the amount of collusion and putting their thumb on the scale from Big Tech — and really kind of both hands and both feet, you can argue — they basically stood on the scale.

Recent Stories

Big Tech Rigged the 2020 Election, GOP Must Investigate

17 Mar 2022

CLAY: The timing on this New York Times revelation — and I say “revelation” because it’s not accurate to say really it’s a revelation because any of you out there with a functional brain who read the story yourself, I think it’s Miranda Devine, Laptop from Hell, we had her on to talk about the book that she wrote entirely about the Hunter Biden laptop.

You had to be willing to suspend all usage of your brain to believe that this was not an accurate reflection of the Hunter laptop and emails because the amount that would have to be changed is so crazy in the details and the photos and everything else.

But I just want to reiterate what I said in that opening segment. Republicans are going to take back the House. I hope that Republicans take back the Senate. The purpose of controlling Congress should be to have an investigation about this. If we can spend as long as we are on January 6th, then the fact that there was Big Tech collusion to ensure that Joe Biden was elected president is a direct attack on our democracy.

And, Buck, we got all these Democrats out there who always want to, you know, grab their pearls and fall on their fainting couch and complain about how much our democracy is under siege, and they use January 6th as evidence of that, Big Tech companies chose the president in 2020 based on the way they allowed Joe Biden to be covered.

BUCK: There’s a fundamental dishonesty that also has to be remembered with those companies. They were built with the promise, not just to their customers, which is you, me, everyone who uses social media, but also to regulators and to the government that that would be platforms for free speech. They openly advocated for themselves as we believe in free speech. We’re essentially going to operate almost like a utility. Psych! Now they pick presidents. I mean, that’s basically what the woke left media apparatus has done now.

They’re just like, “Oh, yeah, forget about all that, we just want to be powerful and make all the determinations about who wins the presidential elections.” Gotta fight against it, folks.

Recent Stories

Zelensky Says WWIII Has Already Begun — Is He Right?

17 Mar 2022

BUCK: Has World War III already started, Zelensky puts out there. That was last night on Lester Holt’s NBC News show. And that was obviously through a translator. But Zelensky calling for us to consider the possibility that we’re already in World War III?

That’s pretty bold talk, I have to say, given what we’re seeing so far. World War III would be multiple combatant countries going at each other in the battlefield, and we’re not there yet.

This is important. It’s important we understand what the stakes are that that we get all this right from the outside because with each passing day it feels like there is a louder chorus of people in America and in the West and Europe, but specifically in America who are saying, come on. Is Putin really going to react as badly as we think if we do this no-fly zone? Are we sure about that? We’re not doing enough. We’re not doing enough! This is what you’re hearing frequently.

Now, notice Zelensky made the comparison to the Second World War. I think it would be also instructive to think about the First World War when the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in what is now the former Yugoslavia led to a series of cascading events that brought the whole world — yes, a world war — into conflict with each other.

I think that would be historically instructive in this moment. And I also think we need to be very cautious that there’s a sense — and, Clay, this is reflected I believe in a poll here on the Ukraine war. What we have been fighting for 20 years in this country are largely counterinsurgency operations in countries that have very limited military capability to begin with and we’re essentially doing policing and nation building with our military. A war with Russia would be something quite different from that.

There’s a Pew poll out that shows 35% of Americans support the U.S. taking military action even if it risks a nuclear conflict with Russia. I sit here and I say, I think these people have never read about Hiroshima and Nagasaki? I think they don’t understand — the same way that they just did I understand what a no-fly zone meant, otherwise I worry a lot of people who through the mass mobilization we’ve seen over covid, they’ve kind of lost their minds and they can be mobilized to whatever the apparatus tells them they have to move toward.

CLAY: That’s a chilling number, Buck. Think about that. One in every three people, basically, in America is okay with us going into Ukraine even if it starts nuclear war.

Now, to your point, Buck, I always like to say, and I think it’s instructive, think about the person of the most average intelligence that you know in your life, 50% of people are dumber than that person. So, you know, average doesn’t necessarily mean that that’s a huge scholar.

But when I hear that 35% of people are okay with nuclear war, the only way that I can even conceive of how that could happen, Buck, is, they don’t know what nuclear war actually is. And that’s because, I think, over the last 35 years or so, really hasn’t been much talk about nuclear war.

When I was a young kid in the late eighties and everybody was still dealing with the Russia situation and the Cold War, that was a conversation. But I think a lot of people, Buck, who grew up entirely in the nineties and the 2000s and the 2010s, I think they lack all conception of what nuclear war actually might be like. And we know, Buck, that the historical knowledge in this country is insanely low. It’s like if it didn’t happen in the last 10 years, people don’t know anything about it.

In the same way that we’ve allowed inflation to get back up to potential double digits because most people don’t really have a lot of experience in the Jimmy Carter double-digit inflation era. Whatever has not happened in recent history, we presume will not happen again, and then when history repeats itself we all look like idiots, and I think that’s where a lot of those people are right now.

BUCK: First of all, Clay, that’s why we have TikTok influencers to make sure we remember all of our historicalized facts and stuff. So —

CLAY: Did you see the TikTok — first of all, she was — the one that I saw, the brunette, like, gorgeous. I can see why she would be popular on TikTok. Did you see the video of her talking about the Ukraine war?

BUCK: I did. I did indeed.

CLAY: I bet you thought the same thing as me. She’s gorgeous. I’m not surprised that people watch her, but the idea that the White House is briefing this girl to talk to people is terrifying to me.

BUCK: Think about this. The only reason to give a White House briefing to TikTok influencers is to try to give greater credibility to their influence on these issues. Otherwise they could do this really complicated thing called, read the newspaper, like, open —

CLAY: I’m not sure that girl can read.

BUCK: I mean —

CLAY: She’s good-looking. I’m not sure she can read. But I think —

BUCK: Very influential.

CLAY: Very influential. Yeah. No kidding. I will say this. To me the reason why you talk to the TikTok influencers is because you’re setting the table for them to influence the election in 2022 and 2024 because they trust that — first of all, it’s flattering even if you’re an imbecile to have the White House reach out to you and say we want to give you a briefing.

We know that there’s no existing knowledge from this group, right? So you’re talking basically to a blank slate. So they will take whatever they are told and regurgitate it for their audience. And to me it’s a test case for the midterms and 2024 when I would bet the Biden White House is gonna try to convince all these young idiots that are sitting around watching TikTok influencers if they vote against Democrats, then the world’s gonna end.

BUCK: I just gotta say that I’m happy that at least on the no-fly zone, increasingly — I don’t know. Maybe some — even these Democrat senators listening to this show because everything that we’ve been saying in recent days about a no-fly zone would actually entail air strikes on the ground against ground targets, and now you’re actually blowing up Russian forces that aren’t even in the sky, never mind shooting planes out of the sky. Here’s Senator Chris Coons saying just that.

COONS: After we tried to force a no-fly zone, not only would we have American pilots confronting Russian pilots and shooting at each other, but we would have to take out Russian air defense systems that are in Russia and in Belarus. That’s how we’d effectively gain control of the airspace over Ukraine. That’s a step I’m not willing to support, but I do think we should give Ukraine every possible stall that will allow them to prevent Russia from succeeding by using air against them.

BUCK: He’s correct. I think it’s so important that what we’re talking about something of this gravity, that the wrong set of ideas, the wrong narrative here embraced by enough people in this country could lead to our military having to fight against the Russian military, we would be losing our men and women in a fight for the sovereignty of Ukraine — which a lot of Americans listening to this right now, look. We all feel badly for what’s happening to the people of Ukraine. We all want them to, you know, kick out the Russian invader. This never should have happened. But we also don’t want to go to war about the sovereignty of Ukraine, like meaning, we, the American people, this is not our fight.

I’m glad that more accurate information about something like a no-fly zone is getting out there. I think at some level people might have to start thinking about, what does a nuclear strike from Russia actually entail? What does that look like. If Russia fires off an ICBM you can set a clock before a U.S. city is likely, although there’s people talk about countermeasures, hits, and there would be a nuclear explosion that would kill hundreds of thousands of people, if not more, right away. That’s what a nuclear war with Russia would entail, everybody.

CLAY: Bipartisanship, Buck, is a good thing when it comes to avoiding nuclear war.

BUCK: Yes. I guess this is where I’m gonna have to say, I break from I think some conservatives a little bit on this issue in the media. It is more important to me that Biden get this right than it is that we get to make fun of Biden for being an idiot and say how weak he is and everything else. That is true on so many issues, but on this issue I just want him to get it right. I don’t care about scoring the political points.

CLAY: If he gets it wrong, a city could cease to exist. I gotta give credit, again, ’cause it does seem like the Senate in particular — there have been some wing nuts in the House who have gone off and said crazy things, but leaving aside Lindsey Graham going on and saying, hey, we gotta get Putin assassinated, which I still think is kind of crazy to say on television or anywhere, for that matter, with a big audience.

But I do think there have been reasonably intelligent Republican and Democratic senators who have looked at the severity of the situation and recognized that getting involved in a military conflict which could lead to nuclear war is something that should be avoided and we should have bipartisan agreement on that.

Recent Stories

Fauci Found! Plus, Will NYC Bench Unvaxxed Yanks and Mets?

17 Mar 2022

BUCK: We have found Fauci, so to speak, the little lab coat tyrant. He’s still out there. He’s not done. We’ve been telling you, he has a lot more tyranny left in him, in fact. He will never be done as long as there’s someone who will put him on TV or radio or perhaps even a YouTube show with hundreds of viewers. Fauci is not done. Here he is saying exactly what we’ve been telling you, that he is not in fact gonna walk away from restrictions.

FAUCI: We have to be careful that if we do see a surge as a result of that, that we’re flexible enough to reinstitute the kinds of interventions that could be necessary to stop an additional surge.

BUCK: He never stopped the surge, it never worked, he says the same crap all the time, he’s out of out of his mind. This is basically after the CDC director — and he’s really a bigger name and has more influence than she does because he’s in the government for longer than I’ve been alive — the top of the pyramid of bureaucratic covid tyranny, Clay, he’s straight up saying it, we’ve been telling everybody.

CLAY: He just escaped from the underground bunker, I think, that the Biden administration has been keeping him in. Do you know where that interview was, Buck, that we just played the audio from? Local San Diego news.

So Dr. Fauci now is so desperate to be relevant, they have sidelined him from CNN or MSNBC or any of those other usual outlets that he was on all the time, and he now is appearing on local San Diego news stations to let everybody know that the mask mandate may need to be re-instituted, that there may need to be indoor crowd restrictions, everything else, all of those measures which have statistically been proven time after time not to work.

Great example from the state of California, Orange County, no mask mandate, L.A. aggressive mask mandate, vaccine mandates, yet they’ve essentially ended up with the same levels of covid infection in Orange County and L.A. County, if you look at the overall chart, it’s absolutely identical no matter that those two counties have made drastically different decisions as to what policies to put in place.

BUCK: And yet here we are still hearing from Fauci, still having to live with the madness of Fauciism lingering out there in the background, which is why we can’t give this up, and it’s also why I think — and we may be joined here by Senator Rand Paul momentarily — we’re trying to track him down. But the idea that they’re gonna eliminate Fauci’s position from NIAID, there have to be consequences for being wrong, professional consequences.

If you can’t lose your job in the government over being essentially the covid czar and a real czar in the sense that it was whatever you said was what went, right? There was no real check on the power of the Fauciite because the the elected officials said it was their decision, and they pointed to elected officials and said they were the ones who were duly doing it.

We had Dr. Marty Makary on yesterday, Clay, we’re going to go into another covid season. Clearly the shots do not save from you covid infectious forever, not even for really more than, what, 60 or 90 the cause before it dramatically drops off. After six months and a new variant, it’s probably close to worthless for a lot of folks, at least in terms of infection control. And we’re gonna be back there. You’re gonna see the same arguments from the same people, “mask up!”

CLAY: There’s no doubt. And, Buck, I saw an article out yesterday, you know, you look at wastewater to determine the rates of covid infection, it’s ticking back up in the United States. We got through Omicron, everything came down on a substantial level, and now we’re talking about looking at Western Europe, England, Germany, some of the rates of covid there have gone back up substantially. And so it’s not as if this is going to disappear.

And this is why we keep telling all of you that the midterms have to be a time for consequences for Democrats and that the vote needs to be predicated on the idea that they will bring back restrictions as fast as they can, that your kids will be in masks, that you will be forced to go back to the idiocy that has not worked, these mitigation measures that have no impact.

BUCK: I know everyone who is in a red state right now is, okay, the plane thing is crazy, you guys are right but it’s not really our problem. Everyone kind of knows at some level that this stuff is nuts, right? Uh-uh. Here is world health official Maria Van Kerkhoff on CNN — ’cause that CNN audience, they want to hear, they have to wear an N95 mask on their bicycle in the bike lane all alone. Here they are.

VAN KHERKHOVE: Wearing of a mask is a simple measure. They are well stocked around the world. They reduce the spread. Distancing, you know, being careful. We’re asking people to be careful. We’re asking policies in countries to use a layered, tailored approach and target it based on the need. It’s too soon to lift measures. It’s far too soon to lift all measures and in particular in certain countries. But we do recognize that countries are in very different situations. We were just asking people and policies to remain cautious.

BUCK: No. I say no. I say you’re wrong all the time, lady. You’ve been wrong the whole time. None of it worked. None of it helped. Stop.

CLAY: Buck, this is why I think paying attention to what’s going on in your hometown of New York City is so significant.

We’re coming up on baseball returning on April 7th, and I saw this this morning, and I was texting with one of my buddies who is a big Mets fan, and it was absolutely wild to think about because the Mets right now, so many baseball players are not being willing to admit whether or not they’re vaccinated, and by vaccinated I mean they got the covid shot.

And this is from Mike Puma, who is a Mets reporter. He said he walked around and tried to poll New York Mets players. Only three would say that they were vaccinated, and a bunch of big names including Jacob deGrom, Nimmo, Alonzo, Smith, Davis, they all refused to say whether or not they had gotten covid shot.

So we’re talking about — think about this, Buck — we’re talking about New York Mets and New York Yankees playing outdoor games in New York City potentially a large number of those guys not being able to play baseball in, what, a little bit over two weeks because of the rules that are in place in New York City.

And to make it clear — they would be to play — this is wild — they would be able to play any other city in America, and they would be able to play if they were visiting players. We’re talking about outdoor baseball games, two years after baseball shut down, the Yankees and the Mets, I know we’ve talked about inquire Cairo and phenomenal nets and how that’s been impacted, but this would be next level, Buck. Even you, who’s not a big sports fan, you know, people are pretty excited in New York for Opening Day.

BUCK: I know who Kyrie Irving is. I work in the media. Yeah.

CLAY: But the Mets and the Yankees are a big deal in New York in a way that, frankly, I think the Nets aren’t. I think this will be a much bigger story because there’s potentially a lot of big names, maybe Alonzo on the Mets, maybe you’ve got big names on the Yankees as well, when you start to talking about guys who are not vaxxed and not being able to play two years later, I mean, this is gonna be a monster story.

BUCK: I think that they’re leaving this employer mandate in place in New York, so that they have that covid restriction light switch. That becomes the first one. And remember, it was such a bad sign, Clay, when you had these vaccine passports in New York. I don’t know if they’re the same everywhere, but I think they are, the CDC card, right? There are all these slots on it.

CLAY: Yeah,

BUCK: And there are all these slots on it when they first gave you your card, when you first got it. Now, I waited as long as humanly possible until they were gonna bar me from being able to do my job or go anywhere in New York City. It’s almost like they at some level knew we’re probably gonna have to give you more shots and there’s a lot more shots coming your way so at least we’ll give you the slots on your vax passport for this. And think about how they’re going to come back to everybody with the justification next fall.

And here’s the only thing. How much of this is tempered — how much honest are they willing to actually show about their intentions with an election coming up. You gotta wonder. I don’t know. I don’t know how much this really moves the needle — I mean, in blue states it’s fine. People in the blue states aren’t done with this. That’s really the problem. They’ve made this a part of their culture. As I’ve said, the mask is the MAGA hat of the left.

Recent Stories

Marine Veteran Volunteers to Fight for Ukraine

17 Mar 2022

BUCK: James in Texas. James, you have an interesting story. Tell us what’s going on.

CALLER: Yes, sir. Mega dittos to you and Mr. Travis. Mega heavenly dittos to Rush. He’s sorely missed. I am a United States Marine Corps and U.S. Army Reserve veteran, almost seven and a half years of service. I am choosing to answer the call for volunteers to go to Ukraine and help them fight the Russian invaders.

BUCK: Tell us more about this. Why would you, as a United States Marine, why do you feel compelled to risk your life on behalf of the Ukrainian fight against Russia?

CALLER: So through the years throughout the global war of terrorism and my participation in it, I’ve lost a lot of friends over there. I’ve lost more friends to the scars that don’t show here. And then with all of our bureaucrats and politicians the way those wars have been handled — Iraq, Afghanistan, and everything in between — it doesn’t seem like the global war on terrorism was the correct cause for me to fight far.

This cause, though, I remember as a child even being told, you know, the Russians, even after the Soviet Union fell, the Russians want to rebuild the Soviet Union. And Vladimir Putin is dead set on doing that. You can see tanks and armored personnel carriers rolling into Ukraine flying the hammer and sickle flag.

So, I mean, if there hasn’t been a just cause to fight in the past, you know, since Vietnam, I believe firmly that this is a just cause to fight. The Ukrainians are more than willing to fight for their freedom and their independence. They don’t ask for anybody else to come onto their land and any other foreign nation’s militaries to come and help them fight directly, but they do ask for volunteers, and they do ask for all the tools.

BUCK: James, can I ask how far along in this process you are? Do you have a plane ticket? Do you know who you’d link up with and how you’d get across the border? And how far into this are you?

CALLER: So, I’m waiting on the passport to come in to be expedited. I’ve been told that will take another week or so. From there, I have to wait for my turn for the interview with the defense attache, with the U.S. consulate. There’s one here in Houston. And then from there they’ll go over my experience, find out where they need me, and then I’ve been told that they’ll even — the Ukrainian government will even provide airfare and get you over there.

BUCK: Well, James, you’re a brave man. Thank you for your service to this country, and stay safe if you do make it over there. Stay safe. Those Russians, they fight dirty. Thanks for calling in, James.

Recent Stories

Victor Davis Hanson Describes Biden’s Big Mistakes with Putin

17 Mar 2022

BUCK: Here is Victor Davis Hanson, who’s one of my favorite voices that you’ll hear as a guest over on Fox, saying that Biden should keep all options open at this point.

HANSON: Anytime you assure an enemy what you’re not going to do, you’re assuring them that they will do it. And Biden is always telling Putin what we’re not going to do. This is a mistake. You know, we’ve had kind of a missile spree. It’s not just in Ukraine. After Afghanistan and this administration, North Korea let off more missiles in January than it has in its entire history. And then we had Iran jump in and send missiles pretty close to a consulate, and then we had sent missiles near the potential border. All these players have been watching Afghanistan and this administration, and they’re thinking, you know what? There’s no consequences, and this is a rare moment to get real strategic advantage over the United States and its allies.

BUCK: This is very interesting in the sense that the weakness of Biden administration does seem to be encouraging bad actors around the world. It’s what former attorney general here Bill Barr said a few moments ago, that when people who are trying to test the limits of American resolved and strategic vision, when they see what we’ve all seen over the last year, when leaders from countries whether it’s Iran or Russia, perhaps soon income, even, there’s some rumbling that there may be more aggressive missile testing to see if North Korea can advance its technology there.

With all of this happening, you have to wonder what would it take for the Biden regime to finally recognize that they don’t have some of the best people making these determinations, they don’t have the diplomatic edge that they coming into this. There was always something of an arrogance around Biden and the team that he brought in on the foreign policy side and an unearned one at that. I mean, what are the victories of foreign policy that the Decembers could point to?

I would remind everybody, Biden was for eight years the vice president to Barack Obama, as we all know. But he was brought in to that role under the promise that he would be a steady hand on foreign, he knew foreign policy stuff so well. The Obama administration for eight years was one long series of international mess-ups and missteps on the diplomatic front.

The only thing, if a Democrat were hire right now I’ll tell you, their argument would be, what about the bin Laden raid? And to that you’d say, okay, that was excellent, and thanks to our Navy SEALs and the night stalkers and the folks that actually conducted the mission, there was some measure of justice achieved against bin Laden.

But think about this on a national and strategic level. Think about Iran and what got worse or got better in terms of our relationship with allies around Iran that we were hoping to be able to count on to box in the ambitions of the mullahs.

Think about Syria, total mess, an absolute disaster playing out in Syria for years. The Obama administration presided over — I can’t remember the exact figures, but it was something like $500 million spent to train a member — and I think it was five or six members of the Free Syrian Army. Unless they were giving everybody Iron Man suits or something, it made no sense whatsoever. But they had no idea. They were messing up all over the place.

So keep that in mind as the situation in Ukraine unfortunately grinds on and gets worse. We should have very limited confidence, if any at all, not just in Biden. I mean, I think he’s clearly lost more than a step, but the people around him have a legacy of foreign policy failure. I’m hoping they get this one right enough that calamity beyond what we’ve already seen is not the result. That’s where I am on this one.

Recent Stories

Sen. Rand Paul Pledges to Hold Fauci Accountable

17 Mar 2022

CLAY: We’re joined now by Senator Rand Paul from the state of Kentucky. Senator Paul, do you fill out a bracket? Buck had never filled one out in his life before this year.

SEN. PAUL: Where has he been? Under a rock his whole life?

CLAY: I know.

SEN. PAUL: I mean, my goodness. Well, see my bracket, I haven’t looked at it lately, but it would include Baylor, UK, and Kentucky, but I don’t know if all three of these, though, can make the Final Four. Somebody has to beat somebody somewhere.

CLAY: Yeah, Baylor and Kentucky could end up going head-to-head before all is said and done.

Let’s dive in. We just played a cut, Doctor, of Dr. Fauci, who appears to be in a bunker by the Biden administration — they’re trying to hide him, but he did an interview — I don’t know if you’ve seen this yet — with a local San Diego news station where he said it may be necessary to reimplement masks and all the other restrictions if we have another surge. Your reaction when you hear that?

SEN. PAUL: If there ever was one American who would have a pessimistic approach to, you know, the pandemic going away, it would have to be Fauci. I was hoping that he was in the witness protection program and we would never see him again, but, you know, he keeps creeping back up. But, no, that has been true every — every — at every stage of the game. When we talk about kids going back to school he’s like, “Well, we just don’t know.” When we talked about whether or not you get immunity from the disease, you know, when you’ve had covid, do you have immune protection, “Well, we just don’t know.” But his conclusion would all —

BUCK: Did we just lose the Senator? Oh, there we go.

SEN. PAUL: You still there?

BUCK: Yes, sir.

CLAY: We got you.

SEN. PAUL: At every turn, though, Fauci his inclination is towards authoritarianism, his inclination is towards taking our liberty away. He’s even said when asked, you know, is individual liberty important? He said, “Well, not so much.” So — but, no, I think we should quit taking advice from him. And I think the American people are ready. I mean, we had the vote this week where 57 of us voted to get rid of the mask mandate on planes. We had eight Democrats joins us, which is a first.

BUCK: What is wrong with — I mean, I’m just gonna ask you, Senator. The Democrats in the Senate, do they actually believe this? I mean, I would like to think that at some level they’re smart enough to understand that just masking on planes is idiocy but that this is just about the political optics for them, or are some of your Democrat colleagues in the Senate so emotionally damaged from the covid and the masking and Fauciism that they really somehow think that masking for less than 1% of a person’s life is going to keep them safe from the virus.

SEN. PAUL: Very few of them have ever had a science course. I mean, about 80 years ago when they were in high school they might have had some basic science, but we’ve got very few on the other side that are scientists, physicians, chemists, engineers.

We have people that are not very knowledgeable on science but there are also people who have a tendency to like collectivism, to like the collective judgment, of somebody telling them what to do and the idea of submission. And this is a real problem, I mean, there was a poll about a month ago that asked Democrats if someone is unvaccinated, would you be fine with incarcerating them. Over half of Democrats thought it’d be fine to indefinitely detain people who chose not to be vaccinated.

So this is the kind of people we’re dealing with, and we’re just on, you know, opposite sides of the coin on this. But I think what they’re finally discovered, eight of the Democrats who voted to get rid of the mask mandate this week, four of them with are in competitive races; so — and the other couple are in Republican states.

So I think it’s pushing forward. I think there are moms and dads who are Democrats and independents that see the hypocrisy of, oh, yeah, my 2-year-old has to wear a mask and yet I see 80-year-old senators, you know, having a chummy conversation with the president Biden, you know, in Oval Office. So there’s no consistency or any science to any of this. And I think people are just tired of the submission just for submission’s sake.

CLAY: Senator Paul, I’m assuming you saw the New York Times has acknowledged that now, oh, these Hunter Biden emails in the laptop, it’s real. I know we’ve talked with you about the possibility of getting an investigation going of Fauci and also of everything surrounding covid in general. It’s imperative that people vote for the House to be taken back and the Senate to be taken back to give you guys the power to ask these kind of important questions, isn’t it?

SEN. PAUL: I can tell people for certain that if the Senate is taken over, I will have a chairmanship, and I will use subpoena power to get to the bottom of this.

In particular, I want to know the origins of virus, and I want to know if Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins covered it up. We have a great deal of evidence that they did, but we still have several emails that were redacted, and I want to know what happened there, and we’re gonna find that out. Some of that information does exist, and we’re gonna get to the bottom of it.

We’re also gonna get to the bottom of the CDC that is leaving out large segments of studies to try to bolster their conclusion. So should a 20-year-old get a booster, which I think is crazy on the surface of it, well, they studied the question and they found in a large study that those between 18 and 49, which is 132 million people, that there was no benefit of a booster. So what did they do? They left it out of the study.

See, if you were in charge of a scientific journal, you should be fired, but if you’re in part of government and you’re, you know, picking and choosing the different parts of the data and leaving it out if it doesn’t fit your conclusion, that’s a fireable offense. And yet they’re doing that on a routine basis, and they’re destroying the reputation of the CDC and government in general.

CLAY: Senator Paul, thank you so much for joining us. We’ll talk to you again soon.

SEN. PAUL: Thanks.

Recent Stories

Airline Pilots Sue CDC to Get Rid of Mask Mandate

17 Mar 2022

BUCK: JetBlue, American, and Southwest pilots are suing the CDC to try to get rid of the federal transportation mask mandate. Ten commercial airline pilots argue the CDC issued an order without providing public notice or soliciting comments. Pilots are asking the court to vacate worldwide the federal transportation mask mandate, calling the move illegal and unconstitutional exercise of executive authority.

Clay, they’re essentially challenging it on procedural grounds, which I don’t know whether this is likely to work or not, you know, where is the case gonna be — you know, which judge is gonna hear it.

But I love that they’re trying because it should just be a reminder to everybody of the abject stupidity of Fauciism and the CDC and cowardice of Democrats who — I think, Clay, at some level now they’re the people that are still terrified walking around with three masks on and it’s embarrassing and I feel sorry that they’re, you know, emotionally so compromised as a result of covid.

I also think there’s a degree of spite, that there are Democrats that, it doesn’t matter that we were right this whole time. They’re like, yeah? We’re gonna make you do it anyway.

CLAY: Well, and to our point earlier, the mandate originally went into effect — the TSA’s mask mandate February 1st, the 2021, according to this, and was set to expire on May 11th of 2021. It has continued over and over and over again.

What I have found that there are a lot of flight attendants who disagree with this. Obviously these 10 different pilots from JetBlue, American, and Southwest disagree with this, and they hate the mandate oftentimes as much as many of their fliers do.

What I noticed fly back from Florida yesterday — I’m about to hop on a flight to go to Las Vegas, so we’ll see how exactly things go on that trip. I’m glad that Las Vegas is back open for business because the last time I was in Las Vegas they had reinstituted a mask mandate too.

But I noticed inside the airport almost nobody was wearing their mask. And so here’s what I would encourage everybody who listens to Clay and Buck to do. If you want to do one of those ridiculous things where you have the mask kind of strapped around your ears, pull it down below your mouth, do it where you’re basically not wearing it. Obviously you can go buy a drink, walk around and be sipping on that. That allows you to be out of the mix.

But the number of people that I saw waking around in the airport in Florida not even worrying to wear a mask at all with no employees following around hectoring them saying you have to put a mask on, you gotta make sure that you’re wearing it, was encouraging. And on the airplane itself — and I fly Southwest almost everywhere — it feels as if the Southwest Airline attendants, by and large, are done with being the police in charge of being the police in charge of making sure people are wearing their mask.

BUCK: I’ve been saying this for a long time. The people that are in charge of enforcing this idiocy should nullify it by just not enforcing it. It’s very straightforward. And Freddie says, oh, but that’s not the spirit of — the, what, the spirit of the federal bureaucracy’s executive orders that we’re supposed to obey on the whims of a bunch of bureaucrats? It’s absurd.

They don’t enforce immigration in this country under the Biden regime but all of a sudden you’re supposed to say the law is the law when it comes to masks? Absolutely not. I’ll tell you,the people that have been mask shamers and the mask enforcers, they’re kind of the worst, Clay, they’re kind of the worst. I’m just saying. You don’t have to do it. You don’t have to be a part of the madness for anybody out there. I know 99.99% of our audience would never do that, but for anybody listening, don’t be a mask shamer.

CLAY: Well, there’s no doubt. And plus, honestly, it makes their job a little harder. I mean, if you’re a flight attendant and you’re in charge of managing the flight in general and getting drinks out — and Southwest has got alcohol back, which I felt like was a big sign of normalcy. I’m not sure how many other airlines have re-instituted beer and wine and liquor on their flights; but when the alcohol came back, it feels like things are very much more back to normalcy.

Given the fact that people are sitting there sipping their drinks or doing whatever, eating whatever devices they might have that they brought on, it feels like a lot of flight attendants personally, just based on what I’m seeing, have just said, I’m over this. I’m not gonna be policing whether or not people are wearing their mask accurately.

BUCK: And they are taking a stand for freedom while passing out peanuts and delicious beverages.

CLAY: Amen. Not peanuts anymore ’cause of peanut allergies, Buck. It’s now a medley of snacks.

BUCK: There’s a little bit of gluten discrimination that goes on here ’cause now on these planes I was good with the peanuts, but now they’re always handing out pretzels and crackers. Are they trying to, you know, knock off the Buckster here? need a GF option, folks. Unfair.

CLAY: You’re gonna be done for, I guess, ’cause I don’t think peanuts are ever coming back. I think they’re gone forever. I used to like some of those peanuts —

BUCK: They are pretty calorie dense, but you know, when they’re salted, I gotta say, I’m a fan, although —

CLAY: I like roasted ones.

BUCK: I like indoor scarves. So I’m kind of a pistachio guy, Clay, if we’re gonna —

CLAY: You also have a scooter with a not very masculine —

BUCK: Have you seen the price of gas, Clay?

CLAY: Do you wear it with the scarf on?

Recent Stories