×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

ESPN Takes Stand Against Florida Parental Rights in Education Bill

21 Mar 2022

CLAY: I’ve been arguing for a long time that the sports media is even more biased than the political media, which coming out of this Hunter Biden discussion that we’re having, this one is even crazier to think about. So, ESPN is not covering the transgender swimmer story, which happened all this week and through the weekend. A 6’4″ man, Will Thomas, decided to become a woman and change his name to Lia Thomas, and won the 500 swim competition over every other woman in college athletics.

ESPN, Buck, just pretended this story basically didn’t exist, because they don’t know how to cover it because it threatens the very essence of women’s sports. What they did cover, they had the women’s NCAA tournament on. And they decided that they were going to take a stand against the “don’t say gay” bill, even though the bill in Florida that we talked about doesn’t actually say gay in any way.

This occurred on ESPN. They had a moment of protest. I want you to listen to this. This is nothing to do with the world of sports at all, Buck. This is a next-level crazy move by ESPN, which has gone full-on woke insanity. This is MS-ESPN. Listen to this.

CLAY: How crazy that is. I could see your face as you’re listening. This is ESPN! This is a sports network. That was not some, like, somebody’s Instagram. If you’re watching the women’s college basketball tournament on ESPN, that’s what you suddenly heard, and then they paused programming.

BUCK: First of all, did she say LGBTQI+? What’s the I?

CLAY: Yeah, I thought you might know.

BUCK: I thought you might know.

CLAY: Is it indigenous people? Are they part of the crew now? Is it indigenous?

BUCK: No, no. “Intersex” is probably what it is.

CLAY: What does intersex mean? I don’t now what that means.

BUCK: That means, there was a previous term that would have been used for that where you have both… By the way, I could be wrong. That’s a guess. No one yell at me I’m guessing what the acronym addition means.

CLAY: Is that when you have two different body parts?

BUCK: Yes, there was a previous term. Now that term, by the way, which we all learned, which begins with an “H,” is considered bad.

CLAY: I don’t even if I knew that term.

BUCK: You’re not allowed to use that term. Now it’s called “intersex.” That’s actually for the biological reality of gender.

CLAY: Small percentage chance occurs where you’re born both maybe male female biology.

BUCK: There’s sort of a bi-gender situation. It’s usually more one than the other. But that’s not what the transgender debate is about. “Intersex” is usually kept in a separate category. I think that’s what the I is. But ESPN introducing me to a new extension of the acronym. Plus, doesn’t the plus cover the I? Isn’t the point of the LGBTQ+?

CLAY: I can barely keep up now. Imagine you’re sitting down, because… By the way, the funny thing about this is it was during the South Carolina women’s game — and I’m not making this up, Buck. They were up 44-4 on the Howard women’s team, the 1 versus the 16 seed. So, the moment of silence really should have been for Howard’s women’s basketball team. But imagine you’re sitting down to watch this with your kids and then suddenly this anchor comes on and talks about the “don’t say gay” and pauses programming.

BUCK: This has an almost Soviet feel where you’re watching sports and they break in they give you some kind of political propaganda message in the middle of it.

CLAY: It’s weird.

BUCK: It’s bizarre. You always tell me this, because you come from a sports world background, that it’s more woke and political than political media. And I think about this. Who in the sports media will say that? A lot of people… We have friends at Fox and the Daily Wire and The Blaze and all over that all agree with us that the trans-athlete competition thing is just flatly absurd, insane and wrong.

Another thing about it. I like the woman who didn’t make it to the NCAA finals came out and said, “Lia Thomas stole my spot,” because that’s the truth. Lia Thomas stole her spot. This should never have happened. In the sports media, you would think there would be some voice.

CLAY: It’s OutKick. It’s OutKick and that’s it. Nobody else will even cover it.

BUCK: What about Barstool?

CLAY: Barstool, they’re so afraid because of the controversies they’ve gotten in the past, that they try and steer clear of almost all political-related issues. They really won’t cover this.

BUCK: This is a litmus test, because if you’re… Not even a conservative, if you’re a rationalist and you cover sports and you see this happening, I didn’t know — it makes sense when you see the photos. Lia Thomas is 6’4″. The women — the actual women — Lia Thomas is swimming against, maybe they’re 5’10”, 5’8″. Whatever.

But it is the visual manifestation of the absurdity that we’re all told not only to accept, to “celebrate,” which is always the next step. It starts with be nice, “Let’s be inclusive, and then just treat everybody alike, put everybody in the same category,” and then it’s, “No, we have to elevate, and you have to bend the knee and accept this and get excited about it.”

CLAY: What’s interesting to me here, Buck, is this is such an extension. Initially, there was at least a tacit connection between the world of sports and politics. That was the fig leaf they would use. When LeBron James says, “I’m not going to go to the White House because Donald Trump is there,” to celebrate winning a championship, “Oh, will Tom Brady be there or not at the White House to celebrate with his Patriot teammates or is he going to stay away? What did Gisele say to him?”

That was sort of the nexus that would allow them to cover left-wing politics. Buck, that was just a SportsCenter anchor coming out, by the way, on a local Florida bill that really will not impact hardly anyone. For those who have forgotten, it’s kindergarten to third grade. They’re not going to allow sex to be taught in public schools for kindergarten through third grade. There’s no sports connection to it at all.

BUCK: One way that you know… What if we just made it…? And Ron DeSantis has gone on offense, as he should, about what is actually called the Parental Rights in Education Bill in Florida. And people don’t even realize, the activists were so aggressive in renaming the bill and getting the media to do their bidding, I think very few people even still know it’s the Parental Rights in Education bill.

But there’s hysteria on the left not only about the LGBTQI+ agenda here. But they also know parental rights in education is a huge vulnerability for them going into the midterms. They know that they got their clocks cleaned in Virginia on the left, because what did our new Governor Youngkin or new Governor Youngkin do? He just said, “Parents should have rights.”

And he actually followed through on that as soon as he came into office. Clay, I think that as people learn more about this, they’ll realize how crazy the left is. But beyond that, what if we just made it kindergartners? What if the bill just said, “What aboutuntil the first grade?” Is that a problem? And then you start to say we’re only talking about up until third grade, which these are really young kids.

Gender identity and sexuality training in the school system for kids who are six, seven, eight years old, as I said before, I’m pretty sure some days I woke up when I was six and I said, “I’m a hippopotamus,” and I didn’t expect anybody to take me on a special trip to the zoo. They are little kids; they are very impressionable. They have parents. You need to guard them for a reason. You have kids. There’s a reason you don’t let your 6-year-old make all the determinations about their day-to-day lives.

CLAY: As my wife has said, for a long time, in response to all these stories, no parent lets their 6-year-old pick all their meals, because if we did, they would eat candy exclusively because they’re 6 and they like the taste of candy, right? So this is just craziness. And this, Buck, significantly has nothing at all to do with sports. And ESPN, by the way, refusing all comment on this story at all, to OutKick, to Fox News, to everybody.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Joe Biden Lied About Hunter, Media and Deep State Allowed It

21 Mar 2022

BIDEN: There’s nothing to any of that. Nothing to any of that! It’s all a smear. (sputters) Every major outfit — every serious investigator — has pointed out that this is a smear. There’s overwhelming evidence from (sputters) the intelligence community that the Russians are engaged! Listen, my son’s an honorable man. Every one of the major people who work for Trump during the impeachment went under oath, and under oath said, “Biden did his job! No law was broke!” Biden — this Biden — did his job. Hunter Biden broke no laws.

BUCK: That was right, right before the election in 2020, just so everyone knows. That was then-candidate Joe Biden, and I think it’s important for us to just say it because it’s the truth. There’s a lot of things these days you can’t say even though they’re the truth. Here’s a thing that’s the truth, Clay: Joe Biden is a liar. All the talk about him being a cuddly old grandpa? He’s a liar, big old liar.

CLAY: Totally. And so were a lot of media. To me, the story is that Joe Biden would lie to protect his drug-addicted, I believe, felonious-behaving son does not surprise me. The fact that the media would all carry water and allow this entire argument to exist? We played all the media that agreed with this allegation being a falsehood. I’m more disgusted with the media than I am with Biden. I’m not surprised. Are you? Parents lie on behalf of their idiot kids all the time.

BUCK: I’m not saying that Biden shouldn’t have lied on behalf of his idiot kid.

CLAY: Yeah, yeah.

BUCK: The rest of the country should have been told the truth by the media.

CLAY: That’s what’s infuriating here is that the media allowed his lie to be accepted as truth.

BUCK: So did all these former intel senior professionals!

CLAY: And from my perspective, you know better than me, that feels even worse than the media do.

BUCK: Yeah. They betrayed their country, but they think they did it a big favor.

Recent Stories

The NY Post Gets No Apologies on Hunter’s Laptop

21 Mar 2022

Miranda Devine joins Clay and Buck today to discuss the 51 intel experts who refuse to apologize for calling Hunter Biden’s laptop Russian disinformation.

NY Post: Spies who lie: 51 ‘intelligence’ experts refuse to apologize for discrediting true Hunter Biden story

NY Post: White House ignores its Hunter problem — Miranda Devine

 

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

21 Mar 2022

Recent Stories

Berenson: Vaccines Have NEGATIVE EFFICACY vs. Omicron

18 Mar 2022

BUCK: We have our friend Alex Berenson with us now as promised here on the Clay and Buck show. He is author of Pandemia, which is a best-seller, despite Big Tech trying to make it tough for him, ’cause it’s a great book. I’ve got my copy at home. Also subscribe to his Substack. Lots of reporting and analysis there. Mr. Alex Berenson, great to have you as always.

BERENSON: Thanks, Buck. Where’s Clay? Is he watching college basketball or something?

BUCK: Oh, he’s betting it all on lucky number seven in Vegas.

BERENSON: (laughing)

BUCK: He’s out there doing some sports stuff and he said, “Buck, I’m gonna throw you the keys to the Ferrari. You’re gonna drive it today solo.” And I said, “Sir, yes, sir.” So, here we are.

BERENSON: (laughing) All right.

BUCK: So, tell me this one. Because I see this; I got mixed feelings. On the one hand, Fauci as reappeared, as we just discussed before you came on, and he’s already saying, “You know, we’ve gotta be ready to go back to whatever level of mitigation,” and I just want to start screaming profanity when I hear that. I honestly want to completely lose my mind — and anybody who goes along with this, I want to yell at them too.

But here’s what we’ve got. Let’s look at the data. I know you sent this out in your most recent Substack and analysis of this. This is the New York Times: “In South Korea, a spike in covid cases meets a collective shrug — South Korea has reported its peak daily coronavirus infection number at 621,328 cases in a country of 50 million people.” So this would be like a few million cases in one day in America. What is going on here, Alex? ‘Cause they’re 90%-plus vaccinated in South Korea, they were so strict on the masking and everything, and now they’re having their, I believe — correct me if I’m wrong — all-time high caseload for South Korea for covid in one day.

BERENSON: Yes. And I mean and not just that, as far as I can tell — and you know I follow this pretty closely — this is the highest number that any major country has ever seen in terms of a percentage of its population in a single day. So, it’s the equivalent of four million cases. And this is not like, oh, you know, we grouped a month of testing and we reported in one day.

No, no. They had 400,000 the day before, they had 400,000 the day before that, then they had 600,000. They are — they are… Everyone in the country is getting Omicron. Okay. Here’s what’s happening. It’s very simple. (laughs) The mRNA vaccines not only offer no protection against Omicron after, you know, maybe two months after that, you know, you get your second dose, you get your booster dose.

It’s now pretty clear that not long after that they actually accelerate the transmission because they reduce your — they reduce your — protection from infection. So protection actually goes below zero, meaning you’re more likely to be infected if you’ve been vaccinated than not, with Omicron. And we could talk about why biologically that is, but (crosstalk)

BUCK: Can you put that…?

BERENSON: (crosstalk)

BUCK: This big thing, Alex… I got so many things. Can you try to put that in layman’s terms for us how that could possibly, because you hear that, I’m sure people’s heads are exploding. How could that even…? Let’s just assume — I mean, I’m sure people would argue and everything else. Let’s assume that’s true. How could it be true that the vaccines have negative efficacy?

BERENSON: Okay. So — and it is true, okay, the data is not just from South Korea or New Zealand or Canada or Britain or even the United States or Denmark. It’s from all these places. Okay? People who are vaccinated are getting infected more rapidly with Omicron. Okay. The reason probably is, almost certainly is the vaccines are very powerful. Okay?

They make you produce antibodies to the spike protein of the coronavirus. That’s what they do, okay. You get this RNA, your body produces all these spikes, your body then recognizes that there are these spikes in it and it needs to produce antibodies to it. Great. That’s what they do; that’s what they’re supposed to do. There’s only one problem. The spike has mutated.

The coronavirus has mutated. It has probably mutated directly as a result of the fact that the vaccines are so powerful in this way. So if you’re the virus and you’re not thinking this but you’re doing it anyway, you evolve away from the antibodies that all these vaccinated people have. So the Omicron spike is different. It looks different. You know, they can do this essentially modeling of what it looks like in a very, you know, complicated way.

It’s this tiny little thing, but they can predict what it’s gonna look like, and it doesn’t look the same. That means that the antibodies that your body has made, not all of them work as well against it as they did against the original spike, okay, if you’ve been vaccinated. And you don’t have any other antibodies. Here’s the other thing, Buck.

If you’re not vaccinated against the coronavirus and you get the coronavirus, once you beat it, your antibodies can spike. You also have antibodies for other parts of the coronavirus. That’s how natural immunity works. None of those people who got vaccinated have antibodies to the other parts of the coronavirus until they get infected with the coronavirus itself, and maybe not even then because these vaccines have wrong-footed our immune system.

BUCK: That’s a stunning… I mean, obviously people are going to flip out about this, Alex, but you’re no stranger to that. But I would want to know. I mean, let me just… So everyone listening to this can have a sense, a full-spectrum sense of the argument, try to tell us — and I know this is… (laughs) I almost can’t say this out loud. Fauci and the rest are talking about the need — forget about mitigation measures for a second, but there’s still a talk about shot number four.

And you just had I think it was Moderna, shot number four emergency authorization for everybody. How can they tell us — when South Korea is over 90% as an entire country vaccinated and somehow hitting an all-time high caseload for covid right now — that the shots are a good idea at this point? Like, what’s the Fauci explanation?

BERENSON: So, so, they’re gonna say two things, okay? And the things are true, but they don’t change the overall picture that I’m painting for you. They’re gonna say, A, “If you get that fourth shot your antibodies are gonna go back up.” That’s true. Okay, so what happens is you get the first shot and the second shot and after the second shot you have a ton of antibodies, more antibodies than that you would have and you’d be infected and recovered.

Your body actually doesn’t want to have that many in your body so it very rapidly cuts them down, and in a few months, you don’t have to more antibodies than you would have after natural infection — and again, you don’t have the same diversity to anybody, okay? So then they boost you; your antibodies go back up. If they boost you again, they’ll go up again.

The problem is the same thing happens again. Your antibodies go right back down. Okay? And you don’t get another kind of protection in the same way following vaccination. You don’t get what’s called cellular immunity, okay? You don’t get the same breadth of T-cell response. Again, it gets really complicated, but your listeners are gonna have to believe me on this. There’s tons of data on it.

So what these people will tell you is, we think/hope that if we give you another shot, it’s gonna improve the… (sigh) what’s called the efficacy of your antibodies, they’re gonna become more mature, they’re gonna become better at attacking all kinds of spikes. That earns really good evidence for that. It’s more a hope that they have. Okay. They have to tell you something. What’s really…

What they’re really trying to do is just buy a couple months, okay? They’re really just trying to jack your antibodies up again so that if you’re infected in the short term, you have so many antibodies that even though they’re not sort of optimized against this spike, enough of them will work against the spike that you’ll have some protection against serious disease and death. That’s really all they are hoping to do at this point, and anybody who says otherwise is essentially lying.

BUCK: Here is also from this New York Times piece about South Korea having a huge spike in cases right now, everybody, just so everyone’s on the same page here. “‘Everyone used to be hush-hush about getting infected, like you were causing a nuisance,’ said … a bartender who owns two cocktail bars in central Seoul… He added: ‘The perception is it’s like getting a cold.'”

Okay. This is in the New York Times. So I know they’re just citing some random person, but the perception in South Korea and they’re choosing to highlight this is it’s like getting a cold at this point. Well, if that’s true why are they still…? I mean, New York City has employment mandate shots still, and they’re talking about bringing back more shots in the fall.

BERENSON: Right. So all these people, they’re sort of caught between all the lies, okay. So Omicron… The one thing they have going for them is that Omicron is less virulent than Delta was or the original wild-type virus was, okay. So a lot of people — especially younger people, healthier people — they, yes, get it. Everyone gets it. I think we all know that now. Everyone, boosted or not, vaccinated or not, gets Omicron.

Most of, if you’re young, you basically don’t have much problem with it, right, most of the time. And these people want to pretend that’s because of the vaccines. It’s not true. It’s just because most — and when I say young, I really mean under 70 or so. If you’re not morbidly obese, you’re not gonna have that much trouble with Omicron, okay? So the smart thing to do would just be essentially to let this fade out, okay?

To do what the South Koreans are doing, just to say, “You know what? Everyone’s gonna get it, and there’s not much we can do about it at this point.” But for whatever reason, they’re — Fauci, these people, they’re — not there yet, and it’s partly their own fault. It’s largely their own fault, because… Because the vaccines don’t work, there’s so many cases right now worldwide and in the United States, there’s still a lot of deaths.

They’re at a level that we were told was unacceptable when Donald Trump was president. So they can’t just say, “You know what?” like, “Yes, 30,000 people a month are dying with/from covid — and, yes, there’s all these infections. But, no, we can’t do anything about it. We tried, we failed, we just have to live with this going forward.” They’re not… I guess politically it is impossible to say that.

So they’re promoting this thing so that anybody who looks at the data in a broad way can see does not work. Okay? You have to look at the worldwide numbers, and you have to look at countries that are really highly vaccinated. Whether it’s South Korea or Denmark or the U.K., there’s a lot of countries that are more highly vaccinated than the United States, and they have tons of infections and lots of deaths right now. The mRNA vaccines have failed.

BUCK: Wow.

BERENSON: They were a nice idea, but they don’t work biologically as we hoped.

BUCK: Alex Berenson, everybody, subscribe to his Substack and get your copy of Pandemia. Alex, always appreciate it. We’ll talk to you again soon.

BERENSON: Let’s talk soon, Buck.

Recent Stories

New York Sun Publisher Dovid Efune Talks Free Speech

18 Mar 2022

BUCK: The First Amendment is under assault in this country in so many ways from Big Tech, from the woke left, from insane libs who don’t believe in basic free speech principles anymore. So we probably shouldn’t call them “liberals.” That’s a whole other discussion. Authoritarians is better. I will even take progressives over liberals. We’ll just call them libs ’cause that drives them insane. The New York Times has an op-ed out from the editorial board.

So this is from the combined intellectual might of such luminaries as Charles Blow and Maureen Dowd and — I don’t know who else works for the editorial there, but other folks — Thomas Friedman. They’re saying, “For all the tolerance and enlightenment that modern society claims, Americans are losing hold of a fundamental right as citizens of a free country: the right to speak their minds and voice their opinions in public without fear of being shamed or shunned,” end quote.

The problem is, the New York Times is the problem when it comes to the First Amendment and so many other places just like it. So I want to bring on our friend Dovid Efune right now. He’s a long-time friend of mine in the world of media. Dovid is the publisher of the newly relaunched New York Sun, NYSun.com. Dovid, great to have you on.

EFUNE: It’s always a pleasure, Buck.

BUCK: Something rich here about the New York Times suddenly discovering that the First Amendment is something that liberals no longer really hold to and therefore are not actually liberals in any classical sense. And beyond that I’m sure you saw, Dovid, that at Yale University, a speaker was shouted down — a conservative speaker — so aggressively that the police had to be called. This is at Yale!

EFUNE: Yeah. I mean, look, the trail of bodies is far too long for the New York Times to be taken seriously on this issue. I mean, look at the likes of Bari Weiss, Adam Rubinstein, James Bennet (their editorial page editor), Donald McNeil was a health correspondent. These are New York Times journalists who were forced out because they made others at the New York Times uncomfortable.

I mean, even as we speak there is a note appended to that infamous Tom Cotton or famous Tom Cotton op-ed where the New York Times says, ‘After publication this essay met strong criticism from many readers, and based on that review, we have concluded that the essay fell short of our standards and should not have been published.” So really —

BUCK: Can we just remind everybody, Dovid, that was about a sitting U.S. Senator writing that the National Guard should be sent in to stop massive riots in the summer of 2020 under BLM’s banner from continuing.

EFUNE: Right. Exactly right. And, you know, facing pushback instead of sticking up for Senator Cotton’s right to say what he has to say, even if it made some people at the Times uncomfortable. They still have a note on the website saying that “the essay fell short of our standards and should not have been published.” It fell short because it made people uncomfortable.

So here’s the New York Times really engaging what I might call in firefighter arson. They’re responsible for setting these fires that they’re now claiming that they want to put out, and the fires that I’m talking about are creating — contributing to the creation of — an environment where many Americans, truthfully, don’t feel comfortable saying what they really think or what they feel.

BUCK: Also, in this New York Times op-ed they write, “Americans feel the burden of this and know it exists. In a national poll commissioned by the New York Times Opinion in Sienna College, only 34% of Americans said they believe that all Americans enjoyed freedom of speech completely. The poll found that 84% of adults said it is a very serious or somewhat serious problem that some Americans do not speak freely in everyday situations because of fear of retaliation or harsh criticism.”

To this, I just say, the 34% who believe Americans actually have free speech in this country, I think they’re the same ones who cheer on the Big Tech shutdown of the entirely accurate Hunter Biden laptop story: The hard-core authoritarian left which has managed to, decades ago, pretend to be about free speech, but now that they have seized the commanding heights of information dissemination and control of journalism and the news media, they want to shut everybody down, Dovid.

EFUNE: Yeah, I think there’s truth to that, and the numbers that the Times publishes there make it quite clear that those that are more in favor of that kind of policing of free speech, creating what you might call a lateral fear society. It’s not coming from the government per se but coming from others in society, especially major media outlets whose their role as, you know, policing what people can think on what they can say. They have really been the ones who created that environment, and the Times’ own numbers that they published show that a lot of that is coming from the far left.

BUCK: Speaking to Dovid Efune, publisher of the New York Sun, which has just been relaunched. Dovid, I wanted to ask you about that. This is a newspaper with a long history in New York City, and you’ve now taken the helm, and you and your team are working to make this, what, a kind of antidote to the madness of the New York Times? Tell us about it.

EFUNE: Well, there’s definitely that in the New York Sun’s history, and I want to encourage everybody to go and check it out — it’s www.NYSun.com — and consider being a part of it. The New York Sun was founded in 1833. That’s 18 years before the New York Times was founded. It’s got that 200 years of history, backed Lincoln during the Civil War.

It really has been a fundamental pillar of American journalism. But really what it specialized in is in its role of being in touch with the people and serving as a voice for the people. It’s masthead declares the same slogan, “It shines for all, a voice for all people,” not just for the woke or for limited audiences, and really that’s…

In bringing back the Sun, it’s been a response to our concern and the concern of many over the way that media — major media outlets — conduct themselves today, especially on this issue, especially in policing what thought is acceptable and what thought isn’t. And, you know, the Sun has this fantastic tradition, incredible history, 200 years of history. It’s got Pulitzer Prizes, that gothic masthead, New York broad sheets.

So in many ways it really is that parallel to the Times, and really competed with the Times in its first iteration and then more recently on the newsstands from 2002 until 2008 in New York City, and now we’re bringing it back primarily as a digital enterprise, but with a reach across the United States. Look, we know that there are a lot of people that are departing from standard media consumption — mainstream media consumption, if you will — but our thought is that the American way is to participate in building a better alternative, and that’s what we’re offering here with the New York Sun and invite everybody to be a part of it. NYSun.com.

BUCK: Dovid Efune, publisher of the newly relaunched New York Sun. Dovid, great to have you, my friend. We’ll talk soon.

EFUNE: Always a pleasure, Buck.

Recent Stories

C&B with Trump Impersonator Captain Deplorable

18 Mar 2022

Visit Captain Deplorable at CaptainDeplorable45.com or on Facebook. His handle is @CaptainDeplorable45 on Instagram, Gab, and Parler. Find him @CaptnDeplorable on Twitter and Gettr. His TikTok and Truth Social handle is @CaptainDeplorable45.

Recent Stories

Journos Will Never Apologize for Ignoring Hunter’s Laptop

18 Mar 2022

BUCK: We will get into the Trump habit of saying things that turn out to be almost prophetic, right? He says things that are true that they hate. He says things that will be true, and they shut him down. They say, “No.” Remember Trump said that there’d be $7 gas under Biden? Sure enough, California, last week, $7 gas in some places. I think it might have even been higher than that. Might have been like eight bucks or something.

It was very, very high. The Hunter Biden laptop it was buried as part of a much larger… They are still looking at Hunter Biden. This is called laundering the narrative through the pretense of journalism. Here’s what they’re doing. This New York Times piece, it was, “Oh, there’s a big, long investigation of Hunter Biden. Let’s write a long piece where we get into some of the details.” They’re looking at Hunter. This is a little true. That’s maybe.

We don’t know. It’s all so they can say, “See, we covered it. We tell you the truth.” Remember, a good propagandist always has a lot of accurate facts. It’s the narratives, it’s usually the conclusions that are the biggest lies and omissions of fact that are necessary to get you to those conclusions. Those are the ways that talented, skilled propagandists try to get the public to think certain things and think things that are not true.

And so that then brings me to what Trump said about the media, to the media just back in 2020 when the Hunter laptop story broke — and remember, they went on a full-scale, scorched earth suppression campaign. “It’s not true. It’s Russian disinformation.” They trotted out clowns from the intel community who used to run it, which people ask why’d you leave the intel community, Buck? Well, ’cause there are a lot of morons running it to be honest with you. And here’s Trump saying in 2020 that the Hunter laptop story is true and the media is disgusting.

BUCK: Can we just take a step back here for a moment? We are being told that, increasingly, it is our responsibility… The elites certainly in the foreign policy, national security apparatus, are saying that the war in Ukraine is a U.S. and NATO responsibility. “We have to do something to end this,” and they keep pushing further and further just shy of U.S. military intervention.

This just happens to be in a country that the former vice president and current president’s son was getting paid off in so that there was at least a perception of access directly to the very top of the U.S. government, and the media’s entirely disinterested in this. In fact, they lied about it. They said it didn’t happen. As we know, that was not true. But I’ll remind you of this as well. They are never… Don’t ever mistake this.

New York Times, CNN, you name it. Any of the libs you see running around on social media who lied about the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation, who cheered as Big Tech shut down the New York Post Twitter account to suppress that story — an entirely true and very newsworthy story. They’re not embarrassed. They succeeded. The lie was what they were going for.

Recent Stories

John Ondrasik Tells Us About His New Viral Ukraine Song

18 Mar 2022

BUCK: John Ondrasik of Five for Fighting fame. That’s his new song, “Can One Man Save the World?” about the president of Ukraine. John is actually with us now. John, thanks for calling in.

ONDRASIK: Buck, how you doing? Nice to talk to you again.

BUCK: Thanks for coming to join… Well, I was gonna say “us.” Today it’s just me. But we’re always appreciative of you calling in. Tell us, what made you think that this was the song to write at this point in time?

ONDRASIK: You know, I think the whole dynamic changed when Secretary Blinken basically offered Zelensky a plane ticket and he said, “Save your plane ticket. Send me some stingers and maybe a few MiGs.” I think a lot of us were like, “Who is this guy?” You know, we’ve been used to decades of passivity from the West. You know, start with Obama in Crimea, the Syria red line that was lost in the sand.

And the only thing we talk about Hong Kong is LeBron trying to cancel Daryl Morey. You know, we shrugged our shoulders at Hong Kong and finally here’s some comedian standing up to authoritarianism, and I think the person probably more shocked than anyone is Putin. So, how can you not be inspired by this guy, his strength, and the Ukrainian people.

BUCK: How has the song been met so far by folks listening? Are you seeing it catching on even more than you had anticipated?

ONDRASIK: Yeah, way more. I really had no expectation. It was one of those songs that you kind of write in the moment. I wrote it, record it, put it out within 48 hours as kind of a scream. And I do think that folks around the world are finding strength in this man. You saw this week, the prime ministers of Poland and Slovenia and Czechoslovakia went to Kiev. You could not have imagined that weeks ago. Russian reporters are starting to betray Putin in the press — and, again, I think they’re just following his example. Courage is contagious.

BUCK: Speaking to John Ondrasik, singer, songwriter, Grammy nominated, and of Five for Fighting. Got a new song, “Can One Man Save the World?” about Volodymyr Zelensky and his fight against Vladimir Putin and Russia. Tell me this. Where can folks go to hear the song, John? Where should they go if they want to check out the full three minutes or so?

ONDRASIK: Well, thanks, Buck. Yeah. You know, the usual streaming, Spotify, Apple Music, there is a YouTube lyric video up there. “Can One Man Save the World?” Also, if you want a free download. It’s important to me that this song is given away for free. Just go to FiveforFighting.com, download the song for free. Share it around the world. I think every voice on this matters, and we have to support this guy. It’s certainly I think a critical point in history.

BUCK: John Ondrasik. John, thanks for stopping by. Always appreciate you calling in.

ONDRASIK: Thanks. Have a good weekend.

Recent Stories

Pelosi and Schwarzenegger Spout Ukraine Silliness

18 Mar 2022

BUCK: Now, I want to spend some time talking to you today about Ukraine. Although I don’t want to, as you’ve noticed, spend a lot of the show on it because I do think that there is a bit of a media obsession with this, with constantly putting this on TV and not really advancing the story. We know there’s a conflict going on in Ukraine that will continue to go on, we should know about it, we should be aware of how serious everything is over there, and there should be a discussion as we’ve done here, I think.

We speak about it, but we don’t only speak about that issue because we still have a border and an economy and inflation and other things and cultural battles to fight here at home, and there’s a lot going on which I don’t think has been certainly reflected by the Democrat media because I think they like this narrative they’ve constructed as they’re all heroes on the Ukraine issue.

Meanwhile, Republicans have overwhelmingly gone along with sending weapons to the Ukrainians, are rooting for the Ukrainians to achieve their sovereignty and independence back from the Russian aggressors. But that somehow gets lost. We hear about the “Putin-supporting Republicans.” I don’t know any Putin-supporting Republicans. I don’t know why people say this. I haven’t come across this.

Maybe they exist, but they’re certainly not prominent, they’re not people that anyone is listening to. But they slander some of the folks over at Fox and say that they’re doing Putin’s bidding. It’s just simply idiotic. Speaking of idiotic, though, Nancy Pelosi… (laughs) I don’t think we played it. There was a couple days ago where she was (impression), “I saw the big convoy of tanks and I want to blow the tanks up.”

You know, she was like General Pelosi all of a sudden, El Commandante Pelosi. “Send the bombers and bomb them!” I’m like, “Whoa, Nancy, settle down. I don’t think Russia should start bombing Russian tank convoys,” unless you want really big problems that may actually affect her in her $10 million mansion in San Francisco. It may actually.

If we go to full-scale nuclear war, the libs will suffer, too, so I think Nancy should be aware of that and maybe she see because she scaled it down a little bit from, “I’d like to bomb them” to reading a… (laughing) This one’s hard to read, seriously. Reading a poem out loud yesterday on St. Patrick’s Day written by Bono, who… Look, I listened to quite a bit of U2 in the nineties. I cannot tell a lie. I liked some of the U2 albums.

I celebrate most of the catalog. But Bono is obviously a little bit of a megalomaniac, right? A little bit of a God complex. But, anyway, he wrote a poem (laughs) about the Ukraine situation, mind you, and Nancy Pelosi chose to read it I guess in an act of solidarity. James Joyce, Keats… Name some of the great writers, the great poets of your high school studies or whatever it is you decide to read, literature. I don’t think Bono is on the list. Here’s Nancy Pelosi reading it.

BUCK: Wow. If you held… I know there’s some teachers listening to this, a lot of parents listening to this show all across the country. Your third grader could write a better poem. That is true. Maybe second graders could write a better poem, but that was what Pelosi decided she was going to share with all of us. And then there was another effort at this, and I have to wonder how much of it is really…?

Is this really meant for consumption of the Russian soldiers and the Russian people. Today Putin just had a major rally. He had a World Cup stadium full of people and he’s talking about… Look, he’s a propagandist. He’s a bad guy. This is not new. This is not surprising. Putin’s a bad guy, has been for a very long time. But he is saying… This was to mark the eighth anniversary of Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea back in 2014.

So you have essentially a big pro-war event. Now, I know they’ll say it’s a lot of government employees and people bused in and all this, but Putin is not backing down from this at all, and I know everyone keeps saying, “Oh, but he’s lost so many soldiers.” Look at Russian military doctrine for the last hundred years. Loss of soldiers is not something that bothers the conscience, unfortunately, of the leadership class in an authoritarian state like Russia or the former Soviet Union.

So that’s not going to do it. How do we manage the situation right now? What can be done on our side? I think I’ve mentioned you all before. I have two brothers, and we grew up watching just all of the classic eighties and some nineties action movies. Schwarzenegger, Stallone. I watched a lot of Jean-Claude Van Damme movies. I still think Bloodsport is an amazing cinematic achievement, for those of you who have not seen it.

It holds up well. I feel like they made it with a budget that you couldn’t even buy an entry-level Tesla, but they made the movie for very little money. Anyway, I loved action movies growing up and watched them with frequency. If you were to see me on the street and quote the movie Commando or Predator, for example, I could respond with the next line almost a hundred percent of the time.

So I was a Schwarzenegger guy. It’s an amazing story that I really thought his work was… Look, he’s a cultural phenomenon in some way, and he was the governor of California. The governor, right? He became a politician. He’s somebody who’s been in a leadership role too. So he puts out this video, and I think the video is well-intentioned.

I actually agree with the overall message: The Russians are fighting an aggressive war that should stop immediately, should never have occurred. But then he does this, and I’m sorry, but we can’t allow this to continue with a narrative of the left, of the elites is that the war in Ukraine is now almost like the January 6 insurrection in terms of how serious this was and how much of a threat to democracy it was.

SCHWARZENEGGER: No one likes to hear something critical of their government. I understand that. But as a longtime friend of the Russian people, I hope you will hear what I have to say. May I remind you that I speak with the same heartfelt concern as I spoke to the American people when there was an attempted insurrection on January 6 last year, when a wild crowd was storming the U.S. Capitol trying to overthrow our government. See, there are moments like this that are so wrong, and then we have to speak up, and it is exactly the same your government.

BUCK: No. I’m sorry. In one who calls the January 6 riot an insurrection to overthrow the United States government by force is either an idiot or a liar. I stand behind this. I’ve written about this. I’ve posted on this at BuckSexton.com a while ago, and a lot of people were saying, “Yeah, absolutely.” This is a case where you say you cannot allow this narrative to continue because it dramatically undermines everything else.

It was a nine-minute-long video he puts out and to get the libs to know that, you know, Arnold is on their side, he does this I spoke out against the insurrection, you know, another serious threat to our democracy. Putin has rolled a couple of hundred thousand soldiers into Ukraine and is firing tanks and missiles at hospitals and killing thousands and thousands of people.

The January 6th insurrection was not an insurrection. It was people that were violating trespassing laws and interfering and obstructing with a government proceeding overwhelmingly in terms of the overall numbers, nonviolently — and those who were violent, didn’t actually kill anybody. In fact, as we know, the only fatality was Ashlie Babbitt, who was shot by an officer who pulled the trigger far too quickly, in my opinion.

But you see, even when we could have a moment of unity, you can’t be in the good graces of the left without taking a cheap shot at the GOP, at Trump, at Trump voters. This is where you’d say, “Why not actually just bring us all together and have a unified message of support for the Ukrainian people?” No. Schwarzenegger takes a cheap shot at the “insurrection,” or maybe he just believes it. Maybe he’s so simple-minded and is thinking about politics. His tenure as governor of California was not good, that he actually thinks what he says is true.

Recent Stories