×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

The Ukrainian Resistance Might Be Stronger Than Putin Thinks

25 Feb 2022

CLAY: I want to talk about an angle in Ukraine that I believe is going to become the focal point as we go forward, and that is what happened to several different individuals in the Zelensky family. Buck, Zelensky, the leader of Ukraine, is refusing to leave the country. He is also saying that he’s refusing to have his family leave the country as well. Now, we don’t know whether for sure his family is still there. I would say I would have… This is me speaking as a dad. I’ve got three young boys, obviously my wife.

I would not want them in the country with me at all if I was in the midst of a Russian invasion. I would want my wife and my kids out of the country. I believe, Buck, you said he has a 17-year-old and a 9-year-old, two kids. And I hope that they are going to be safe, all of them. But if Russia — and there are reports that these Chechen assassins are effectively roaming the streets right now of Kiev looking for high-profile targets, meaning high-echelon government employees as well as the president and his advisers.

If Russia captures and kills him, I think it’s going to connect in a way that many other deaths do not, because we know that this is an invasion of a democratic country. But if you are then stripping the leader out of his position and potentially executing or imprisoning him, that is going to be a next-level form of usurpation, I think, as many people are going to see it — and it’s not just him, by the way.

For those of you out there who are boxing fans, two of the most well-known boxers in the last 20 years or so, the Klitschko Brothers — both of whom were champions. One of them is the mayor of Kiev, the other one is also Ukrainian. They’re both worth $50 million or more based on what they made in their boxing careers. They are right now fighting against the Russians as well, which represents a form of bravery that is all too rare in the world of athletics intersecting with politics. But these guys, I think, for many Americans are going to become the face of the Ukrainian struggle.

BUCK: Clay, it’s almost hard to believe when you read about where Zelensky comes from. People refer to him, he’s a comedian and an actor. But his most well-known role — this is true, everybody. Zelensky’s most well-known of anything in his professional career, before becoming president — was he played an everyday guy who ran for president of Ukraine on an anti-corruption platform. He then decided to run for president of Ukraine on an anti-corruption platform — this is real — and became the president of Ukraine. So, imagine if… Remember the movie Dave with I think it was Kevin Kline with he plays sort of the stunt double, almost?

CLAY: Martin Sheen from West Wing.

BUCK: Martin Sheen from West Wing. Imagine that… I think Martin Sheen does think that he’s the president, or that he was, at least for a while. But imagine that they ran. As you mentioned, you have now one of the most well-known and successful boxers of his generation straight up with an M60, basically, or he’s taking automatic weapons. Someone’s gonna yell at me, “It’s not an M60!” But he’s taking up arms himself as the mayor.

This is what’s actually happening in this city. I don’t think anybody would ever expect that the former mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio, is ever gonna have bandoleers of ammunition on him and was actually gonna take up arms in defense of his city no matter what happened. These are guys… There’s a heroism narrative here that you’re seeing among the Ukrainian leadership, the fact that you have people who are members of Parliament who are donning body armor.

CLAY: Men and women.

BUCK: Yes, and saying, “We will fight to the death to defend our parliament.” There are lessons that I think a lot of people around the world are gonna take from this, and there are stories here you may have seen, Clay. There was an outpost of effectively border guards on an island, Ukrainian border guards, about 13 of them, and a Russian warship — which has them completely outgunned and on an island, so there’s nowhere to go.

The Russian warship said, “Surrender,” and there’s actual audio of this. It’s in Ukrainian so it wouldn’t make much sense to play it here. But in the translation, they essentially say, “Okay, guys, what should we tell them?” And they say, “Go [bleep] yourselves” is what they say to this Russian warship knowing they’re about to get annihilated, they wanted to make a point they were going down fighting. If that mentality is more widespread in Ukraine, we could see a very protracted struggle.

But the casualty figures for the Russians right now are being reported at over a thousand for the first day. I have no way of knowing. I’m not in the intel community anymore, haven’t been in years. I have no way of validating one way or the other whether those numbers are real, but there is a possibility here, Clay. I know it’s war. It’s horrible. It’s the ugliest thing that occurs from man’s inhumanity to man.

This is the ugliest thing that’s going to occur anywhere in so many ways, but there is this possibility that perhaps this breaks Putin over the long term. I don’t think in the short term that will happen. But depending on how this goes… Remember the Soviet Union was undone by its invasion of Afghanistan. It was a long time coming but that was for many the trigger point, if you will, that was what actually brought them down.

If you’re talking about massive losses and to your point about Zelensky, this stuff becomes very visceral. This becomes very emotional for people. It hits them in the gut when they see these stories of brave Ukrainians defending their own homes and their own Parliament and just city streets, and Russia is running over them because they couldn’t just have a real negotiation over NATO? That’s what’s gonna go on here?

So there is the possibility that you see greater… We didn’t mention this yesterday in the show. There were protests. They are being cracked down to viciously which we knew, but was there some protests in St. Petersburg, I believe some in Moscow as well where thousands of young Russians particularly have gone out into the streets. So there’s gonna be a lot of pressure brought to bear behind the scenes as well. Remember, Putin, he’s got a scary military and a lot of nukes but it’s a $1.4 trillion economy, and there is an opposition to him within the country. So there are some reasons to hope that maybe, maybe this brings down Putin’s grip on power in the country if it turns out to be a debacle, which we’re all hoping that it will.

CLAY: Also want to mention, you were talking about the Russian protesters and obviously the bravery that it requires inside of Russia to be willing to stand up to the power and might of Vladimir Putin. A Russian tennis player named Andrey Rublev, right after he advanced to the final in the tennis match in Dubai, he wrote, “No war, please” with a Sharpie marker on the camera lens of the television camera. So, I mean, that is a different level of brave too.

We talk much about all the athletes and entertainers and everybody else who speak out. Most of them don’t risk very much in the grand scheme of things because they actually get rewarded for their left-wing activism. Well, Andrey Rublev speaking out and writing, “No war, please,” in the middle of Russia invading Ukraine is a pretty brave gesture by him to have been willing to do, again, right after he won a tennis match in Dubai to advance to the final there.

BUCK: Yeah. Taking a knee at a football game in America just gets you more credibility on the left and million-dollar deals from Nike, et cetera. If you’re a Russian Federation citizen and you do something like this, they gave you a phone call… I mean, I know how the FSB works. They’ll put a phone call in to you that your dad is now under corruption investigation and facing 15 years in prison. The Russians play dirty. There are very real consequences for people who go against the state.

So you’re right, Clay, that act — those public demonstrations — of solidarity with Ukrainians and with humanity comes with a price in Russia. In this country we’re so used to people on the left taking a popular position in the pop culture, if you will, and then acting like they’re selfless heroes that are putting it on the line. That’s not the case here. Over in Russia, you speak out against Putin right now, you’re putting a lot on the line.

CLAY: And when you get rewarded for something, to me, in many ways it’s the opposite of bravery. If you make more money because of something that you say, you can call it a lot of things — capitalistic in nature — it’s not brave, and it’s not courageous, very often. To me, bravery and courage requires that there be a risk potentially of life or liberty. And I think that Russian tennis player certainly and his family is putting himself on the line in a way that very few athletes have been willing to put themselves on the line in recent years, despite the fact that we regularly toss around the concept of bravery and try to claim that it is more common than it is.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

C&B PSA: Post-Pandemic Paranoia Syndrome

25 Feb 2022

CLAY: Buck, you and I know ’cause we actually look at the data — and it’s not that complicated to look at the data, analyze it, and come up with plans that make sense based on the data we’re seeing — there’s no way to justify suddenly a change in masking. As we’ve seen all these different cities and states, all the blue areas that have been wearing masks for so long, suddenly have recognized that the polling has turned against them for kids in masks — the polling has turned against them for indoor mask mandates, certainly for outdoor mask mandates.

And so they are abandoning all of those in rapid fashion, even though the rates of covid infection are much higher today than they were at the same date last year when Joe Biden was telling you that he was gonna solve covid. But part of this is a mental disorder which has been diagnosed by our good friend production All-Star Ali on the staff, and she wrote this up and put it together, and I think you’re going to enjoy this PSA…

ANNOUNCER: If you or someone you know is having a hard time getting back to normal, they might have P-P-P-S: Post-Pandemic Paranoia Syndrome. Signs of P-P-P-S: compulsive testing, double masking everywhere, and hanging on Fauci’s every word.

VOICE 1: I sneezed this morning and took three tests afterwards.

VOICE 2: I’ll never feel safe in a group again.

VOICE 3: I have, like, an entire wardrobe of masks that match my outfits.

ANNOUNCER: Post-Pandemic Paranoia Syndrome is treatable, and the Better Science Treatment Center can help. BS Treatment Center Services include: daily, mask-free walks and horseback rides. Group therapy that’s not over Zoom and the chairs aren’t six feet apart. Exposure to other points of view, like Clay Travis and Buck Sexton. Here’s a testimonial from Karen, whose family sent her for BS Treatment after an intervention.

KAREN: I was out of control and hit rock bottom after a booster binge. No one had seen my face in two years and when they tried to remove the mask… well, I’m not proud of that moment. But the BS Treatment Center helped me reclaim my life. Now I have a new addiction, a healthy one: Clay Travis and Buck Sexton, voices of sanity in an insane world.

BUCK: I gotta say, that one was really good.

CLAY: That’s well done.

BUCK: That’s really well done.

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

25 Feb 2022

  • New York Post: Joy Behar moans Russia-Ukraine war is making her vacation plans uncertain
  • Politico: Putin was playing Biden all along. The U.S. president and his aides thought they could manage Putin. Their calculations were dead wrong
  • Breitbart: Pics: Ukraine Claims Major Victories Against Russian Invaders, Including 1,000 Dead
  • FOXNews: Hillary Clinton repeatedly suggests Donald Trump, Republicans enabling Putin aggression during MSNBC interview
  • UK Daily Mail: Ukraine’s Tiananmen moment: Brave civilian attempts to block Russian military convoy as Putin’s men bear down on Kyiv with soldiers on the streets preparing for bloody defence of the capital

  • UK Daily Mail: City under siege: Photos from inside Kyiv show bombed out schools, decimated homes and dead soldiers lying in the streets of the Ukrainian capital
  • New York Post: Kyiv residents told to prep Molotov cocktails as Russian troops enter Ukraine capital
  • AP: Ukraine’s capital under threat as Russia presses invasion
  • Axios: Zelensky to EU leaders: “This might be the last time you see me alive”
  • Washington Post: Ukraine says Chernobyl radiation levels ‘exceeded,’ as Russia confirms its forces seized the nuclear plant
  • PJ Media: After Sanctions on Russia Fail, Biden Lies About Why He Imposed Them
  • BizPacReview: President to honor courageous Snake Island heroes who told Russian warship to ‘go f*** themselves’

  • AP: Key inflation gauge hit 6.1% in January, highest since 1982
  • New York Post: The week in whoppers: Tom Friedman’s ‘oops,’ the WaPo’s cluelessness and more
  • Washington Post: At the moment he’s prepared for his whole career, Biden faces the limits of his power

  • Breitbart: Proposed Canadian Law Would Penalize INTENT to Commit Online ‘Hate Speech’
  • American Greatness: Trudeau’s Tyranny and the War on Civil Society
  • HotAir: Science changing? CDC to finally “loosen” mask guidelines … after Dem governors bail
  • AP: CDC to significantly ease pandemic mask guidelines Friday
  • CNN: Covid-19 is killing more people now than during most of the pandemic. Here’s who’s still at risk
  • Federalist: The Ruling Class Is A Far Greater Threat To Americans Than Russia Is
  • New York Post: Hundreds of people are living in NYC subway stations and tunnels, MTA says
  • American Greatness: On the Eve of the Show Trials

  • Recent Stories

    Fox News Picks Up on C&B’s Take on the Media and Ukraine

    25 Feb 2022

    Recent Stories

    Buck Dissects Putin’s Goals, Opposition

    25 Feb 2022

    “How Far Is Putin Willing to Go?” As the world asks that question, Buck joined Jesse Watters to break down the possible outcomes of Putin rolling over the ineffectual Biden, and tearing chunks off Ukraine.

    Recent Stories

    Joe Contradicts Kamala on the Purpose of Sanctions

    24 Feb 2022

    CLAY: President Biden said today in a statement, Buck, “No one expected the sanctions to prevent anything from happening.” That was Biden today. This was Vice President Kamala Harris on Sunday: “The purpose of the sanctions has always been and continues to be deterrence.” So it’s good that the president and the vice president have got their decision made as to what the purpose of sanctions are, but, my goodness, what absurdity. I saw this and I kind of laughed, but I’m not that happy that this is the brain trust duality that we have trying to lead us right now.

    BUCK: Well, Clay, I think you’re forgetting, “It is time to do what we have been doing, and that time is every day.”

    CLAY: For people out there, that’s a quote from Kamala Harris.

    BUCK: That was top-tier Kamala Harris stuff right there.

    CLAY: We need to have that one ready all the time. That is ridiculous.

    Recent Stories

    What Did Biden Mean by His No Comment on China?

    24 Feb 2022

    BUCK: Clay and I both immediately honed in on this. This was a moment where a question got asked that… Well, here’s what Biden said about his reaching out to China one way or the other. Listen.

    BUCK: Not prepared to comment on that at the time. That’s a pretty straightforward, “Yes, I’m urging them to.” Now, we don’t want to read too much into this, but it does seem noteworthy, Clay, that he felt like he didn’t want to show his hand on this. It’s certainly worth noting as well the entire world, effectively, has been trying to sanction North Korea into compliance, into submission for a very long time. It does not work.

    We have leverage, but it has not brought about desired result. And the reason for that is China. China allows North Korea… China could shut down North Korea effectively tomorrow, could make the country economically effectively null, it could annihilate it if it wanted to economically, but they don’t. Russia has an outlet here to China during the sanctions phase, and that could be very important going forward.

    CLAY: I think this is maybe the most fascinating bit of news we have gotten from the White House specifically. Now, there wasn’t any question about Taiwan or concern there, but when you consider Biden’s address where he made it so paramount the number of people that he was interacting with around the world… I mean, they’re making a big deal of the fact that the sanctions are taking place in the euro, in the dollar, in the yen, in all of the major currencies of the world.

    He talked, certainly, about the NATO commitment. I believe he mentioned Japan and Korea specifically, South Korea, obviously, and so China was notable for its omission. That was a very good question that was asked, and it doesn’t really make any sense, the answer that Biden gave, if things are going well with China right now. Because there shouldn’t be any reason why that would be classified information.

    You would think that the United States would want China to bring whatever power it has to bear on Russia too. And if there is some sort of alliance behind the scenes between China and Russia, it makes it more likely also that we get a Taiwan impact. But this would also, Buck, mean that the power of the sanctions, if they’re not involving the second biggest economy in the world?

    Well, you’re creating a new axis of Russian power, where, in theory — if they can’t sell their assets to Europe or the United States or any of those allied democratic countries — there’s a big marketplace in China where these two countries could be able to interact. So I thought, by far, that’s a big story. We need to know more about what’s going on right now between the United States, China, and Russia, as part of that tripartite relationship.

    Recent Stories

    National Security Analyst Steve Yates Talks Ukraine with C&B

    24 Feb 2022

    BUCK: Why don’t we bring Stephen Yates on with us now, Clay. He’s senior fellow at the America First Policy Institute, former deputy national security adviser to Vice President Cheney. Stephen, thanks for being with us.

    YATES: My pleasure. Thanks for having me.

    BUCK: Hey, Stephen. I’ve known you now for many, many years, and this audience may not know you. You are a fluent Mandarin speaker as well as being a general student and policymaker in the realm of geopolitics. What did you make of that — Clay pointed this out — Biden not prepared to talk about whether he’s putting pressure on China to try to put further pressure on Putin during this situation? What was your takeaway from that?

    YATES: Well, I think that’s a very dangerous proposition. I think we have to first begin with the reality that President Trump actually warned NATO about overdependence on energy from Russia, underinvestment in their defenses and that Europe needed to take better care of Europe. We’re reaping those consequences now. But the problem is the demonstration effect of this failure of that alliance and the failure of Europe is provocative and will spread to other places.

    I think it’s incredibly shortsighted to think that agent provocateurs in Tehran — you know, the Iranians on pursuit of a nuclear deal — the Chinese with pressure towards Taiwan or other areas… This is just an open invitation for revisionism and aggression, and the president seems barely able to read through his script, much less to pull a coalition of people together to roll back this aggression.

    CLAY: All right. So, he’s not commenting on basically his conversations with China as it pertains to Russia. We know that China has been, I would, say aggressively pushing the bounds of what is acceptable as it pertains to Taiwan. We’re gonna asking, I’m sure, about Ukraine, but just hearing that answer and that question, how nervous do you think Americans — certainly people who are in Taiwan, in the Pacific, how nervous should we — be about the situation not only in Ukraine, but about Taiwan and China right now?

    YATES: I think we have to be nervous just because we have this steady cascade of failure. It began unraveling with Afghanistan, but when you spy weakness in one area and aggressors take advantage, it’s just only natural that it will lead to further problems. Taiwan is a much different kind of challenge for China than Ukraine was for Russia in this instance, and it remains to be seen whether the Ukrainian people grind this out and come out the other end in some form or fashion.

    It’s travesty now. But when it comes to Taiwan, Americans don’t fully understand how the important the supply chain from Taiwan is to the United States. All of our smart world — our devices, our cars, our GPS, all kinds of things in our life — depends on that natural flow of technology, in addition to the values of standing with a free and democratic people, really make that situation dire.

    BUCK: Stephen, how well do you think Taiwan would be…? Clay and I talked to former president Trump about this earlier in the week. He is concerned about the possibility that this situation in Europe presents an opportunity for the Chinese Communist Party to just go for it while the world already feels like it’s focused in on and unable to maybe even cope with more than one challenge at a time in Ukraine. How serious do you think the defense of Taiwan would be absent a major U.S. military intervention?

    YATES: It would be serious, but it would be probably outmatched by what China would seek to bring to the table in the early stages. And if we learn anything from the Ukraine situation that should apply in this Asia context, it is don’t wait until after the aggression is underway to put sanctions or other deterrents in place. Don’t wait to bolster and make more independently capable your allies until it’s needed in the time of conflict. We’re behind on this.

    People in the Biden administration have talked about a “pivot” to Asia basically in the Obama years and these years, but nothing has happened, and so I think we start from behind. The people of Taiwan, the people of Japan who would be most affected by this. There really would be a pretty significant resistance. But China has the potential to bring all kinds of trouble, including the cyber capabilities we saw Russia employ in Ukraine. That would be a significant challenge there and here.

    CLAY: We’re talking to Steve Yates, senior fellow at the America First Policy Institute, former deputy national security adviser to Vice President Cheney. So how impactful do you expect for all of these rules and regulations — the sanctions that Joe Biden announced even more stringent just now in his press availability and statement, how impactful do you anticipate those — will be on Russia, on Putin and on the ruling class of the country?

    YATES: Well, I think the only thing we can use as a gauge to measure is the fact that it had to have been anticipated that sanctions would be coming. There was lots of talk about them being super-duper strong. And so Vladimir Putin had to expect that the first tranche wouldn’t be the last tranche. And so it didn’t change their strategic behavior at all. And so Russia was still very willing to use traditional military capabilities, nontraditional capabilities in cyber.

    They seemed to be taking Chernobyl, and who knows what that can of worms might imply. And we still don’t know whether this is a smash-and-grab to put a new government in Ukraine and they pull back, or whether this is a broader strategic campaign. And so with all that uncertainty, it’s just all the more important that Americans get back to our energy independence, get back to hardening the United States and having our own capabilities and urging our other allies to do the same.

    BUCK: Stephen, what do you think Putin’s real end state goal is here? He’s already gone with the full, three-pronged invasion. There’s air, sea, land assets of the Russian military deployed. What do you think he is trying to get out of this? Because that obviously factors into how long this will go, how high the casualties are likely to be, and what could end it.

    YATES: Well, I think I have to humbly say I can’t tell where Putin defines the end state. But it sure looks like he has every intention of installing a puppet or friendly government in all of Russia’s near abroad, that in some ways reestablishes the sphere of influence that the Soviet Union had. So whether that is the individual dream of Putin that the Russian people will tolerate and whether the pain that may come from that, or whether it’s somewhat a dying man late stage in life leader just going for the dream he’s had since what he called “the greatest tragedy of the twentieth century,” the fall of the Soviet Union, gets reversed.

    CLAY: Steve, do we have any sense how well or how long or how committed Ukraine might be to fighting against the Russian rule in an insurgent basis? Do we have any early reads or any idea what to expect there, how long this could drag on?

    YATES: Well, they certainly have the capability to grind this out for a good, long time. I think they would be very difficult people to actually have govern, which is why I expect Russia would not actually seek to make Ukraine part of the Russian Federation, but instead to try to enact a regime change where they had a friendly puppet government doing its bidding instead. But they certainly have the capability.

    They have — maybe interesting by some people — somewhat of a Second Amendment situation where they have armed citizens who are there to protect their households against invaders, and so they have this ability to ground it out. But we’ve seen in recent times that when people feel abandoned, they might abandon the materiel that we sold them, and we just can’t know whether this is one of those quick-fold situations or they’ll hold on.

    BUCK: Stephen, how did you think the policies that Biden laid out in that speech that just finished moments ago…? Is that everything that should be and could be done at this point? Is there something else that you think should have been added into the mix?

    YATES: I think it just all begins and ends with Europe having to grow up and take care of Europe. Just the president needed to ride very hard on that responsibility. Yes, Putin is responsible for being an evil man, imposing his will on his neighbor. But this is Europe failing in its own responsibility, and until we get that right, sanctions and movement of troops from the United States to bolster NATO isn’t gonna change the status quo.

    CLAY: Steve, should we be concerned about this spiraling outside of Ukraine? How concerned are you that somehow NATO gets drawn in, that another country that the United States does have to commit men and materiel in a substantial fashion gets drawn in here? How much should Americans be concerned about that idea?

    YATES: I think we have to be very concerned about the Baltic states. We have in some ways encouraged them to poke the bear next door, and we sort of celebrate their pluckiness and independence. But they’re in a very vulnerable military position. And given NATO’s ineffectualness in determining the movement against Ukraine, we should under treaty obligation under NATO to have to intervene in a very untenable situation with the Baltics. And so I hope that that is not the direction this goes. But I fear that this could spiral across Europe and the U.S. homeland when it comes to our power lines, our pipelines, and our cyber security situation because Russia has threatened “unconventional resistance” to anyone who intervenes.

    BUCK: Steve Yates, senior fellow at the America First Policy Institute, former deputy national security adviser to VP Cheney. Steve, always insightful, my friend. Thanks for being with us here.

    YATES: My pleasure. Thank you both.

    Recent Stories

    Dr. Leana Wen Discovers Remote Learning, Masks Hurt Kids

    24 Feb 2022

    CLAY: We’ve been talking almost entirely Ukraine, okay, so far, obviously, with that’s going on in the country. But I didn’t want our good friend Dr. Leana Wen at CNN to avoid… Buck, even for the wild pivot that we have seen from, “Everybody has to be wearing four N95s, everybody has to be vaccinated, you shouldn’t be able to get on an airplane and travel anywhere in this country,” to all of a sudden Dr. Leana Wen sounds like Clay Travis or Buck Sexton when it comes to analyzing the impact of schools being shut down.

    Now, it took her two years after us to catch up for Dr. Wen. Listen to this cut. This was CNN last night. This was not Clay Travis or Buck Sexton in April and May of 2020. Leana Wen has suddenly discovered, CNN’s top medical expert (summarized), “Hey, when kids aren’t in school, it actually ends up having a really negative consequence for them.” Listen.

    BUCK: Clay, can I just say some of us have been saying this for two years, basically, and what’s remarkable is how many people I guess they go along with this now as though it’s a revelation. All of this is obvious. Everyone should have known all along there were going to be dramatic consequences to taking kids out of school for a whole school year, in some cases more than a whole school year, and masking up children in school and all the things that have been done to them and separating them and making them — in the case of New York City schools — eat their lunch outside and masking up between bites in 35-degree weather.

    This was always crazy. It’s just now that it’s no longer politically necessary to go along with the lies, people like Dr. Wen will speak the obvious truths that have been known all along. These people, there’s something sociopathic here about the Fauciites, and there has been all along because there’s no way they didn’t know this. They were either in on the apparatus of control or they just were too scared to speak the truth, which unfortunately was true of a lot of people in the science and medical communicates — scientific community, medical community. Very troubling to see how many of them were just, “I don’t want to get yelled at. I don’t want people to be mean to me over this one.” Well, a lot of kids are gonna have very different life outcomes now as a result of that cowardice, in part.

    CLAY: You and I were saying this in May and June of 2020. What’s crazy, Buck, is the American Academy of Pediatricians — I may be bungling that name a little bit, but the largest group of pediatricians — came out in June of 2020 and said that kids needed to all be back in school, and yet nobody followed the science. They got political pressure rained down upon them, the pediatricians did, from all of the teachers out there. But make no mistake about what is happening.

    You and me, Buck, and lots of our listeners out there either long-term commitments or have slowly had themselves red pilled over the last several days and weeks and months as all this has piled up, we were all right. And there have to be consequences when there are multiple options in a democratic system and one group of people makes the right choices, makes the correct judgment for everybody — black, white, Asian Hispanic, gay and straight, all age kids, all age parents.

    When we made the right choice and we said, “Kids need to be in school, they don’t need to be in masks, there are gonna be severe learning consequences that manifest themselves for years and years into the future and the other side is wrong on all of that,” I’m not willing — and I don’t think you are either, Buck — to just say, “Oh, welcome to the team, Leana Wen! We’re so glad to have you.” No. No. There have to be consequences for the politicians who listened to the Leana Wens of the world and made disastrous decisions for our kids. And if they aren’t, what’s the purpose of an election at all if you’re not holding your leaders accountable?

    BUCK: It was the most disastrous series of policy decisions and the most unaccountable in the sense that they kept passing responsibility back and forth. “Oh, it’s the state government. Oh, it’s the logical government. Oh, it’s the federal government,” as if you’ll the experts it all those different levels, state, local, federal, nobody was willing to have an open and honest debate about it. The social media platforms shut down discussion of this. Our friend Alex Berenson got kicked off of Twitter. He’s suing Twitter.

    CLAY: He’s with us tomorrow, by the way, right?

    BUCK: That was the next thing was gonna be with us tomorrow to talk about the data and where it stands now. You’ll notice they’re not talking a lot about it right now. I think there are reasons for that. This comes right out — obviously the Ukraine war is front and center of the news cycle, but they haven’t been speaking about it really for days, ever since that revelation that…

    Let’s all be very clear about this. This is a party of fact, now. This is established on the record. The CDC has been hiding data that it has about critical aspects of the covid response because they’re worried that you and us, the peasants, in their eyes, will misinterpret those big, scary numbers if they actually show us the numbers. In any other area of American public life of consequence, this would be a massive scandal. Imagine, you know, if the Pentagon was hiding number of casualties in a foreign war.

    Imagine if the Treasury department was hiding the actual level of taxation that people were paying or whatever it may be, right? I mean, there’s so many things you could point to. Hiding key data from the public for their own good. That is authoritarian, dictator bullcrap, and I think we all see it as such. It’s gonna keep going like that unless the Democrats get scared after the election that their party will be thrown out of the political wilderness for years and years to come.

    Recent Stories

    Never Forget What Tyrant Trudeau Did to the Truckers

    24 Feb 2022

    BUCK: We also wanted to make sure we keep an eye on other news stories that are happening, other things going on across not just the country, but around the world. But, in this case, right next door in Canada, we had followed very closely the situation of the trucker convoy protest, which has now essentially been broken up by Trudeau sending in the police to arrest, shut down, and also seize the bank accounts of anybody involved in this. Well, Trudeau, now that it’s over for the time being, has said the following about the state of emergency that his own Parliament, unfortunately, did ratify ’cause there’s a lot of socialists who like the use of authoritarian powers in Canada, certainly in the Canadian government.

    Here’s what Trudeau said. Play it.

    TRUDEAU: Today, after careful consideration, we’re ready to confirm that the situation is no longer an emergency. Therefore, the federal government, ending the use of the Emergencies Act. We are confident that existing law and bylaws are now sufficient to keep people safe.

    BUCK: Clay, this guy… Look, obviously Putin’s going full-scale invasion right now in a country that was not threatening him and this is an aggressive invasion over there, but the Trudeau tyranny over here about covid is something that I think it’s hard for people to forget about, or I hope they won’t forget about it, because it just shows you that there was so much of what we’ve all been put through for two years here that was about politics and power.

    It was not… What they did to the truckers was not about keeping anyone safe from the virus. It wasn’t about “stopping the spread.” It was about, “Listen to us or else, peasants,” and it’s a reminder of why we need to defend our freedoms even in times — most of in times — of emergency.

    CLAY: It was jarring to see Trudeau trying to condemn Putin when the acts that he undertook to bring those peaceful protesters to their knees and beyond, because they’re going to continue to pursue them all over the place, and there was no need for it. That’s what is going to be so jarring is even though Canada lost its mind with covid, there’s a very strong chance that Canada’s going to be eliminating masks, that they’re going to eliminating vaccine mandates, that everyone is going to be able to go back in some measure to normal, which is exactly what all the protesters were pursuing.

    And we’ll see what happens with potentially the truckers that are talking about gathering next week in Washington, D.C. I do genuinely wonder how, if there was a trucker protest that emerged in Washington, D.C., Joe Biden would handle it. They obviously have put the Capitol back wreathed in fencing so that you can’t get close to it because they’re going to try to sell the idea of this is January 6th all over again.

    What I would say to the truckers out there is, understand that if you are going to go to Washington, D.C., that is going to be the narrative that the media, to a large extent, is going to sell to a willing public, which is these truckers are one year later basically January 6th despots all over again trying to shut down our government through their protest. Now, what’s already interesting, Buck — and I’m sure you saw this.

    Remember when the idea of calling in troops to help provide security was so unacceptable that when Tom Cotton, a sitting senator from Arkansas, wrote it on the New York Times op-ed page, they fired the editor for even allowing that opinion to be uttered? Well, they’ve already called in, I believe, 800 Guardsmen to help prepare for what may or may not be a substantial number of truckers that are headed to D.C.

    BUCK: Yeah. Protests and riots that are rooted in not just socialism but really a virulent Marxism, that’s fine. Western governments, according to our own media, and the apparatus here, not supposed to do anything about that. Let that go. Let the people riot. Let them have their say when it’s for BLM or whatever — Occupy Wall Street or any of these movements that are out there, Antifa.

    And yet when you had a peaceful protest against vaccine mandates and really just the covid tyranny that we’ve all been put through — and I am not forgetting, I’m not backing off one inch from the promises that we have made here on the show, Clay, to continue to make sure people focus on that going into the midterms because what was done to us.

    CLAY: Consequences.

    BUCK: Consequences. That’s right.

    CLAY: Consequences have to exist.

    BUCK: There must be accountability for this, because what they did was crazy. These people are out of their minds. You mentioned there are some tweets. Now, these aren’t from Biden officials or anything, but people have tweets out there and they don’t look like they’re trying to be funny, saying things like, “It’s really funny how many people are crowded indoors in Ukraine without masks on right now.”

    There was a mass hysteria that the Democrat Party weaponized but then really couldn’t control. They weaponized it against Trump but then they realized they couldn’t turn it off so they just went with it, and they liked the power that it gave them so they doubled down on it, but this was a really dangerous time in the history of our country for what they did to basic freedoms and the viciousness with which Joe Biden divided our country.

    Look, I’m seeing a lot of it now. Clay, they’re seeing over Ukraine. “Now you must rally behind Biden!” Really? On the vaccine mandate, the “This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Shut up, peasant! Don’t leave your home. If you don’t get the shot, you’re a monster who wants grandma to die” president? That’s the guy I’m supposed to rally behind now because of a war that’s 5,000 miles away? No, thanks. No, thanks. I’ll wait ’til they get rid of all the mandates including can the mask one on planes, thank you very much. I don’t think so.

    CLAY: As well as criticizing the idea of it being unpatriotic to be criticizing the president, when the same people told us for four years when they ripped Donald Trump to shreds for every single thing that he did, that that was the height of patriotism — when they gave themselves all those journalism awards for democracy dying in darkness and all that shenanigans.

    And now when reasonable people are taking a step back and saying, “Hey, I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Putin didn’t make a move at all while Donald Trump was in office, and then a little over a year after Joe Biden’s in office — after the disaster of the summer that was Afghanistan — that now we have to worry not only about Ukraine but” as we started off the show talking about, Buck, “the fear is also that we could be dealing with a legitimate issue in the Pacific with Taiwan and with China as well,” that those twin pillars of combat that we have now between Russia and China are getting closer together, and they may well be allied against American interests in having dual-fronted invasions.

    Recent Stories