×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Psaki Defends Biden’s SCOTUS Quota, Cruz Crushes It

1 Feb 2022

BUCK: First, a little more on the continuing — I don’t even think there’s a controversy, just discussion, we could say — discussion over Biden’s promise to nominate a black female Supreme Court jurist. Is it problematic to say you’re only going to consider one gender, one race, whatever the case may be? Well, White House press secretary Jen Psaki weighed in on this one. Here’s what she said.

PSAKI: I would note that there’s a long history here. Ummm, President Reagan promised the country he would nominate the country’s first woman to serve on the court, and he did so. Uh, former president Trump also promised to choose a woman just — just over a year ago. And there was no such complaint, uh, from the voices on the right who are speaking out now. Uh, but the president’s commitment, uh, is to, uh, deliver on the promise he made to the country, but there’s no question in his mind that there is a wealth of qualified, talented, uhh, black women to choose from.

BUCK: So I don’t remember — and I say that honestly. I do not remember President Trump saying he will only nominate a woman. He certainly didn’t say he would only nominate a white woman. I don’t remember, though, it was only going to be a woman, although if someone could point this out, that’s my memory. I’m not correcting Jen Psaki on this one.

I’m just saying, Clay, if you have a different recollection, if anyone out there, let me know. But I don’t… It’s one thing to pick a woman, obviously. It’s another thing to say I’m only going to consider a woman for this seat. Okay, that’s part 1. Not about whether there’s some strategy behind the scenes about whether you’re announcing it that way. Ted Cruz, though, hey, particular analysis on this issue. Play 13.

CRUZ: The fact that he’s willing to make a promise at the outset that it must be a black woman, I gotta say that’s offensive. You know, black women are, what, 6% of the U.S. population? He’s saying to 94% of Americans, “I don’t give a damn about you. You are ineligible,” and he’s also saying… It’s also an insult to black woman. If he came and said I’m gonna put the best jurist on the court and he looked at a number of people and he ended up nominating a black woman, he could credibly say, “Okay. I’m a nominating the person who’s most qualified.” He’s not even pretending to say that! He’s saying, “If you’re a white guy, tough luck. If you’re a white woman, tough luck. You don’t qualify.”

BUCK: Clay, that sounds quite a bit like what you’ve been saying on it.

CLAY: I think it’s the right argument here, Buck. When you really break down what’s going on in the grand scheme of things, this is a failure of Joe Biden — and, by the way, 76% of the American public disagrees with him saying, “I’m going to pick a black woman.” Look, I understand the argument that’s out there of, well, we’ve said before — certainly Joe Biden said, “I’m only gonna pick a woman,” and before that we said similarly something that was interesting.

Which is Ronald Reagan said, “Hey, I’m gonna pick a woman.” But really, Buck, when you break that down, that’s different because even if you say you’re going to pick a woman — and Trump may have said it for Amy Coney Barrett, too — you’re at least willing to take 50% of the overall population and consider them for a job. I still don’t personally think it’s appropriate at this point in this era to say, “Hey, I’m going to pick a guy,” “I’m going to pick a girl.”

But certainly when you specify a particular race and gender, you’ve gone from 50% of the population eligible for a job to 6% of the population eligible for a job. And I would just say, imagine the reaction if Donald Trump had said after Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed and he had the opportunity to replace her, “I’m only going to consider a white woman to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg,” the world would have come undone. I don’t think because Joe Biden says he’s only going to consider a black woman that the reaction should be any different at all, personally.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

The Left’s Communist Definition of “Misinformation”

1 Feb 2022

CLAY: There’s a lot of talk about “misinformation,” which, again, disinformation, whatever you want to phrase it as, it isn’t actually established what is actually being spread about covid that is either misinformation or disinformation, which allows people to say things like Andrew Ross Sorkin did on CNBC, because people… Whenever somebody says, “I’m a big believer in the First Amendment, but,” that’s a big old “but” to drop into the middle of the sentence. Listen to this.

SORKIN: Here they are putting badges and other things on the material. Is it gonna be enough? I don’t know. Do I give Joe Rogan some semblance of credit for saying he’s gonna put somebody on the other side? Sure. But there… Y’know, the idea of putting certain types of controversial voices out there — and I’m a big believer in the First Amendment, but when the information is wrong and demonstrably wrong and can hurt and injure and in certain cases kill people, I think that there is a higher bar to clear.

BUCK: If you are making the claim… Speaking about a high bar to clear, Clay, if you’re gonna make the claim in a public forum that someone is responsible for information that is directly leading to deaths, it is absolutely dishonorable and disgraceful on a number of levels, by the way, not to identify what that is.

CLAY: Amen.

BUCK: This is the big game they’re playing. You know, in Russian they have something called “dezinformatsiya,” disinformation, right? They put this out there, and it’s intentionally dishonest information to bring about a certain result, a certain perception in the person receiving information, right? They do this all the time they do it for political reasons military intelligence reasons misinformation is essentially a play on this because again if it were lies, they would say lies.

If it were just factually inaccurate, they’d say it’s factually inaccurate. The reason they’re playing these games and saying these things is because what they mean by misinformation is actually you and me — and a lot of other people now, by the way — saying masking up kids in school is crazy. Now, that’s not an issue. That’s not an issue of fact so much as an issue of balancing out what we should be achieving for children in schools and what their risks are.

It’s a judgement call, right? It’s a judgment call. But they say it’s misinformation because it deviates from the consensus. If they explain this to people, though, Clay, then it doesn’t sound as scary, right? So what do they have to say? They can’t say Joe Rogan has people on who disagree with us on matters where people can and should disagree. They say, “If you listen to Joe Rogan, people are dying; therefore, we have to shut him down, based on that.” This is crazy.

CLAY: Yes. I think that’s really well said. And that is what needs to happen. What a rigorous media would do is they would actually say, “Okay. What has Joe Rogan said that has proven to be factually inaccurate?” Because, by the way, you want to talk about misinformation or disinformation? The CDC has consistently put out misinformation and disinformation! Can we grab, maybe, again the Rachel Maddow clip where she lectures her audience and says, “Hey, if you get this vaccine, you will never get covid, and you will never transmit it.”

Because that, by the way, is what the CDC was telling everybody in February and March. I’m old enough to remember early last year, Buck, in 2021, when to we were being lectured to by the CDC and by MSNBC and the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN who were all just taking the government talking points — which, by the way, isn’t actually reporting. It’s propaganda.

If you take — uncritically — what government authorities are you telling you and disseminate it to your audience without analyzing any of the underlying data yourself, you are not a journalist; you are a government propagandist. And so this idea that you or me or anybody like Joe Rogan has been spreading disinformation or misinformation? Buck, since we took over this show in June of last year, I would put this show’s discussions of covid and our guests’ discussion of covid up against anyone in media, period.

Right? If you went back and listened to every conversation we had, analyzed it within the context of what existing data said and showed at that time — I’m not talking about looking at something that was said in June of last year and comparing it to what we know now with new data at this moment, I’m saying in the time that we had those conversations — I’m not sure that any show in the entire country has been more honest and transparent and factually rooted in data than this one in the entire country. I would take those odds. I bet you would, too.

BUCK: Yeah, of course.

CLAY: Can you think of any show out there? Television, radio, podcast, YouTube, any of them? I would put this show up against every single one of them.

BUCK: Yeah. I’m glad that some of the guests that we have end up getting on other big shows later on. I’m happy to be helping folks get pointed towards the truth, and that’s what really matters here is getting to the right answers and getting to what’s actually necessary for us to go forward.

Recent Stories

Joy Behar Begs More Musicians to Protest Spotify

1 Feb 2022

BUCK: Joy Behar is saying that she is dis… Okay. So what’s the big controversy right now? And this is important. ‘Cause, you know, Clay was laying out yesterday that Rogan, that there could be a big win here for Rogan if they did cancel him because he’s so influential. All that’s true. The left, however, is seeing this as —

CLAY: They want a scalp.

BUCK: They want a scalp, and this is a very big name/very big person to go after because he has cross-party appeal, and that’s what… You know, Clay and I sit here and we’re just like, “Bring it on.” We’re the guys that are walking… We’re the conservatives walking into the bar full of commies, saying, “Who wants to fight?” Rogan walks in and says, “Hey, everybody. Sit down,” and the commies will listen to him a little bit. So that makes them more upset.

And we got Joy Behar — although, like we said, Democrats everywhere welcome… I’m just saying in terms of the way they view us. They’re not… Democrats are not coming on this show. Rogan has this ability to, as a Bernie bro — he’s a Bernie bro — go back and forth a little bit between left and right. Joy Behar is disappointed, though, that more musicians… We’ve had, what, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, someone else, too, right? Joni Mitchell —

CLAY: An E Street Band member, I think. Neil Lofgren? Nils Lofgren? I… You and I are not musical experts; so, like, in general we’re not gonna be the experts. These are relatively, what, D- or F-list celebrity musicians in terms of their impact. Nobody out there… Spotify is not doing a lot of business on either of these people or any of these people.

BUCK: But Behar is disappointed that more musicians aren’t pulling out. Here she is. Play clip 1.

BEHAR: Let’s see if they put their money where their mouth is, and a lot of people… I was disappointed. Contrary to you, I was disappointed that more, uh, musicians and singers, et cetera, did not pull out. They’re on Twitter all the time trashing, uh, people who don’t get vaccinated, and then they keep their music there. This would have been a good opportunity to show what you believe in, and I didn’t see it. But I only saw two people from the sixties and seventies. Let’s see some young people!

BUCK: (impression) “Let’s see some young, ignorant people who know nothing take a big political stand here.” And, Clay, I just would say about this whole if there is a big-name artist, I mean, if there’s someone, you know, who you and I do know of from the contemporary music world who comes out against Rogan, I think they’re gonna have something of a showdown here. not because it’s about dollars and cents but because the employees of Spotify will absolutely terrify the executive suite of Spotify and they’ll cave. That’s the possibility.

CLAY: It is interesting how big the musician would have to be. I was thinking about this a little bit yesterday as this story continued to play out. Because this is probably the best advertisement Neil Young has ever gotten for his music in the last, what, 30 years, I would bet in general. Nobody really knows who Neil Young is. Again, when we first started talking about Neil Young on this show, Buck, I said the only time I’ve even heard Neil Young’s name was in Sweet Home Alabama.

They were making fun of Neil Young who had written anti-southern — according to the guys behind Sweet Home Alabama, had written anti-southern — lyrics and had attacked the people of the South. That’s why they said, “I hope Neil Young will remember” for those of you out there. Do we have the rights to Sweet Home Alabama, by the way? Can we play that when we come back in our next segment? I’m not sure exactly how the musical rights here work. But I will say that if, like, think about who the people are that could come out. Who were the five or 10 biggest musicians.

BUCK: If Beyonce came out —

CLAY: Beyonce.

BUCK: — that would be bi. You know, if Jay-Z —

CLAY: Jay-Z, Beyonce and Jay-Z came together.

BUCK: Who’s really cool these days? I don’t even really know who’s really cool these days. I would say U2, and everyone would you think I’m stuck in 1987.

CLAY: Dave Grohl, obviously, with Foo Fighters, if he came out. If you want to think about different genres of artists who are just massive, those are the kind of people where I think Spotify would have to consider.

BUCK: Taylor Swift?

CLAY: I’m a Taylor Swift fan. I love her music, not of her politics but I will say I think some of these artists are not even on Spotify. Didn’t Jay-Z have his own — Jay-Z and Beyonce have their own — streaming service? Unless Spotify bought it. So part of this thing is, I believe some artists are not on Spotify in the first place because of the way that streaming rights work. My wife would know the answer to this ’cause I have to pay… How many streaming services are you signed up for right now, Buck?

BUCK: I mean, a few. First off, of course I love — my first love is — the iHeart app, which is where I stream all of my music as well as my podcasts. But there are some other streams that I’ve heard of out there. And, Clay, I think what we’re seeing right here is a fascinating moment in time where they can’t even allow someone — with Rogan, they do not allow the guy… By the way, I hate that we’re doing all this, like, free advertisement for Rogan and the show.

But he is really at the center of this cancel culture issue, and I want… We stand with free speech. The same way that we’re, you know, the unsinkable aircraft carrier of free speech for conservatives, I think that we extend that to anyone. Glenn Greenwald is welcome on the show all the time. He’s a man of principle. Ppeople on the left. Tulsi Gabbard, we’d love to have had her on the show, people on the left who have principles —

CLAY: Fauci. Even people with disagree with we’re not running and hiding from them.

BUCK: He won’t come on ’cause Clay is unvaccinated, and the droplets may come through the microphone, travel a long distance. Anyway, yes, we would have Fauci on and I promise I wouldn’t make fun of him to his face. But he does know that I make fun of him, from what I understand.

Recent Stories

Whoopi Doubles Down on Her Holocaust Ignorance

1 Feb 2022

CLAY: Whoopi Goldberg. Yesterday, we talked about this. I don’t know if she missed basically all of the stories surrounding World War II and the Holocaust and exactly what the Nazis were trying to do, but she made an incredibly stupid comment on The View yesterday about how there was no racial element to the Nazis. And then as that story blew up and as Whoopi Goldberg was being attacked…

And, by the way, I want to reinforce, neither Buck nor I believe that Whoopi Goldberg should be fired. Unlike people on the far left wing who every time somebody utters a phrase that they don’t like or even says something dumb, I don’t believe your entire career should disappear over something that you say, whether you’re a left-winger, right winger, middle of the road, whether you have zero interest in politics at all. But Whoopi Goldberg fell on the sword. She went on I believe Stephen Colbert last night and begged for forgiveness, says she’ll never bring it up again and let’s listen to Whoopi’s apology.

GOLDBERG: This is what’s interesting to me because the Nazis lied. It wasn’t… They — they had issues with ethnicity, not with race, because most of the Nazis were white people and most of the people they were attacking were white people. So to me, I’m thinking, “How can you…? How can you say it’s about race if you are fighting each other?” So it all really began because I said, “How will children…? How will we explain to children what happened in Nazi Germany? This wasn’t…” I said, “This wasn’t racial. This was about white-on-white,” and everybody said, “No, no, no. It was racial,” and so that’s what this all came from. So, once again, don’t write me anymore. I know how you feel, okay? I already know. I get it, and I’m going to take your word for it and never bring it up again.

BUCK: I mean she sounds almost like she —

CLAY: Doesn’t believe it?

BUCK: — has some ground to stand on, that what she said wasn’t entirely ignorant and inaccurate, even though she’s apologizing, which I just want to say, she did walk back at the end, but she kind of took a couple steps forward if you know what I mean. There was a little bit of, “Well, this was…” No, no. No, no. When the Nazis were reverting themselves as the master race, they were distinguishing in their minds.

Their evil ideology was rooted in a sense of their racial superiority, and that, then, of course led to the death camps, the extermination of the Jews and — as I said yesterday — the extermination of European Roma to the tune of almost a million, over 90% of them killed. Six million Jews, eleven million people — 1.4 million, I believe, Polish Catholics. Now, that is not an issue of race. That’s an issue of, well, just Nazis being genocidal lunatics.

CLAY: There would have been a lot of people of all different races that would have gotten exterminated if the Nazis had been able to continue their march across the world.

BUCK: They were viciously soaked in racism against all people of dark skin all over the world. I mean, the Nazis were evil.

CLAY: When you refer to yourself, Buck, as “the master race,” it kind of makes it about race. I don’t know how Whoopi Goldberg could miss that.

BUCK: And there is also… There was a teaching moment here, I think, in a sense too because the Nazis initially went after — and when I say “went after,” I mean put in camps and then exterminated — people with physical disabilities.

CLAY: Yep.

BUCK: Went after political opponents, went after what we would today refer to as members of the LGBTQ community. The Nazis when a whole range of people. But within that, what they were trying to exterminate within that at the very top was the Jewish people and the racism therein. So it’s just… I mean, is Whoopi Goldberg…? You know, she’s kind of apologizing but also doing this, “Yeah, but, like, I know I’m gonna be fine in terms of my career.” If she were a conservative, folks? Oh, my gosh. It would be a whole different world. We all know that. But also, a conservative wouldn’t say that. This is all about the left-right paradigm of how they do race, Clay.

CLAY: Yeah, that’s 100% of what I was gonna say. Everything in left-wing circles is about white versus black racism — and if you can’t understand that within the context of racism, everything else doesn’t matter, and that’s really what she was saying.

Recent Stories

C&B 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

1 Feb 2022

  • The Atlantic: The Case Against Masks at School. Districts should rethink imposing on millions of children an intervention that provides little discernible benefit – Margery Smelkinson, Leslie Bienen, and Jeanne Noble
  • FOXNews: Border Patrol agents get into heated exchange with leadership during Mayorkas visit, leaked video shows
  • HotAir: NY Times: China finds COVID restrictions are a useful way to control people
  • DNYUZ: Spotify’s Joe Rogan Problem Isn’t Going Away
  • UK Daily Mail: ‘As a black person I think of race as being something that I can see’: Whoopi Goldberg tries to justify her claim that the Holocaust was not about race – by saying the Nazis ‘had to do the work’ because ‘you couldn’t tell who was Jewish’
  • Breitbart: Triple-Vaxed and Coronavirus-Positive Justin Trudeau: Getting Vaccinated ‘Defines What Being a Canadian Is’
  • Daily Wire: Censored Scientist Dr. Malone Slams Bill Gates In ‘Candace’ Interview: ‘A Leopard Can’t Change Its Spots’
  • YahooNews: Pandemic tensions deepen in Florida as DeSantis digs in
  • Mediaite: Covid Fatigue? 70% of Americans Say ‘We Just Need to Get on With Our Lives,’ According to New Poll
  • Mediaite: Reuters Issues Major Correction to Report Originally Claiming Ivermectin Was Found Effective Against Omicron

  • BizPacReview: West Australia threatens $50,000 fine and jail for people who are ‘offensive’ to workers checking vax cards
  • Washington Post: 4.3 million Americans left their jobs in December as omicron variant disrupted everything
  • DNYUZ: Little of the Paycheck Protection Program’s $800 Billion Protected Paychecks
  • New York Post: NY redistricting shows Democrats don’t care about voter rights, only consolidating power
  • Daily Wire: Wild Redistricting To Give Democrats More House Seats: ‘Brazen Attempt’ At ‘Rigging’ Election To Keep Pelosi Speaker
  • BizPacReview: Scientists speak out on COVID lab leak theory, and how they were silenced: ‘All about politics’

  • UK Daily Mail: Canada’s ‘Freedom Convoy’ truckers block key Montana crossing route for beef and farm equipment to protest Trudeau’s vaccine mandates: PM isolates with COVID in undisclosed location and refuses to meet with protesters
  • New York Post: BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors tied to other groups with spending ‘red flags’: report
  • UK Daily Mail: AOC takes to Instagram to announce she is staying off Twitter because ‘negative comments’ gave her ‘anxiety’ after her maskless, partying vacation to Miami and her battle with COVID
  • UK Daily Mail: Smoking gun documents tie Nancy Pelosi’s son to fraud and bribery scheme to remove permit violations against squalid San Francisco flop house owned by his ex-girlfriend and probed by the FBI

  • Daily Wire: ‘Global Criminal Enterprise’: More Counterfeit Driver’s Licenses From China Seized In Memphis ‘Daily’ As Fake IDs On The Rise
  • Wall Street Journal: China’s Communist Party Quietly Inserts Itself Into Everyday Life
  • UK Daily Mail: Transgender inmate, 26, who pleaded guilty to molesting girl, 10, in 2014 could face only SIX MONTHS after serving two years in LA juvenile detention center because woke DA refused to try her as an adult
  • PJ Media: Trans Athletes, The New York Times, and the Ivy League
  • Federalist: Catering To The Left’s Delusions Greenlights Sex Crimes, Looting, And Torturing Children
  • JustTheNews: Biden Boomerang: Newly released State memos undercut Democrats’ Ukraine impeachment story

  • Recent Stories

    Clay Takes on NASCAR’s Woke Left Turn

    1 Feb 2022

    Clay appeared on Laura Ingraham’s The Ingraham Angle to discuss NASCAR, the latest sports league to decide going woke is the smart way to go, even though it’s a sure-fire way to go broke. Plus, the NFL welcomes people who encourage murdering policemen and women to perform the Super Bowl halftime show.

    Recent Stories