×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Sen. Hawley on SCOTUS, Ukraine, China, Big Tech, the Chiefs

3 Feb 2022

BUCK: We are joined by Missouri Senator Josh Hawley once again. Senator Hawley, great to have you with us.

SEN. HAWLEY: Hey, thanks for having me.

BUCK: Let me just start with… I hadn’t heard, and I’m sure you’ve shared it, but I was curious about your feelings with this announcement from the Biden administration of an open Supreme Court seat that he would only — that he would follow through on the initial promise of only — appointing a black female jurist to the high court. What do you make of that, Senator Hawley?

SEN. HAWLEY: Well, you know, he can appoint whomever he wants, I suppose. I said I think it’s a mistake to appoint based on a quota and to rule out large numbers of people before you’ve even looked at their merits or qualifications. But listen, my criteria are this: This needs to be a pro-Constitution judge who is going to apply the law as it’s written and not how they want it to be — and also, by the way, who believes in the rule of law.

I mean, I don’t think the president’s noticed, but we’re in the midst of a historic crime wave and we need judges who actually believe in our criminal law system who believe that it is just and fair and not systemically racist. And I tell you, he’s been sending up to the Senate one activist, left-wing, pro-crime, pro-criminal judge after another. So, I hope that’s not who he sends us for the Supreme Court.

CLAY: Senator Hawley, appreciate you joining us. I know the White House has been coming after you basically accusing you of, as close as they can get up to saying it (laughing), that you’re basically a Russian plant for the arguments that you’re making about Ukraine. Now, first of all, are you, in fact, a Russian plant?

SEN. HAWLEY: (laughing)

CLAY: And second, what did you think when you saw what Jen Psaki said at the White House?

SEN. HAWLEY: Oh, my gosh. I mean, just… No, I’m not, to answer your first question, Clay.

CLAY: (laughing)

SEN. HAWLEY: I want to get that on the record. I just think that it shows how intellectually and morally bankrupt this administration is. I mean, they don’t have the ability to engage in any kind of an argument for any of their positions because they are historically unpopular.

Nobody likes what they’re doing, nobody believes in their policies, and they don’t want to have a debate about it. They don’t want to have an argument. They want to shout down their critics, whether it’s me or Joe Rogan or anybody else, shout ’em down and shut ’em down because they don’t want open debate ’cause they’re losing.

Listen, on Ukraine, who’s responsible for the position the United States is in with regard to Ukraine? Joe Biden is. Who came into office and allowed Russia to start up their energy pipeline, Nord Stream 2 it’s called, the energy pipeline that stuffed dollars into the pockets of Vladimir Putin and his cronies? Who did that? Joe Biden did that.

Who denied Ukraine military aid last year when Ukraine asked for it? Joe Biden did — and now that we’re in a crisis, now he wants to send American troops from our country to Europe. We already have tens of thousands there; he wants even more! I think that’s a mistake. I am opposed to sending thousands of additional troops, and I’ll take my stand on that any day.

BUCK: Speaking to Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri. Senator Hawley, you’ve got the Olympics… I’m sorry. Clay’s the sports guy, I have to look at him make sure I get the hand signals.

SEN. HAWLEY: (laughing)

BUCK: I think starting today in Beijing right? That’s enough of news story. Clay is giving me the thumbs up; I appreciate that. But, you know, for me the angle of it that is particularly interesting, and I think for a lot of other folks is, what’s happening in China… I feel like more and more Americans and honestly the whole world are waking up to the realities of not just the threat of the Chinese Communist Party internally to dissent and human rights but obviously to the rest of the world. So how do you think people should be approaching this? Obviously we’re supportive of the athletes, and that’s great. But what do you think about China being able to hold this? I feel like some people are saying it feels like a little bizarre.

SEN. HAWLEY: Oh, they never should have ever been allowed to host the Olympic games. No question about it. And the fact that large corporations and NBC, I guess it is, is televising it — I’m not watching any of this I don’t know but I think it’s NBC televising it — you know, making money on this, who knows, just truckloads of cash on it. I know is really repulsive. I mean, it’s just…

The fact that China is allowed to try and sugarcoat its record of being the most oppressive, totalitarian regime on the planet. It’s, frankly, just sickening. So listen. I certainly support our athletes. I hope they do great. I wish them well, but I personally am not gonna watch on television and not gonna give my support to that as a citizen. I think it’s wrong, and I think it’s wrong China has the games.

CLAY: We were talking earlier — and I agree with everything you said — about bowing down to China and allowing them to host the winter Olympics at all. I think it’s a disgrace that we’ve allowed that to occur. But speaking of allowed to occur, you mentioned Joe Rogan, and certainly we’ve seen with Whoopi Goldberg and what’s happened to her and all of the discussions this week surrounding what should and shouldn’t be permissible to be said.

I’m a big marketplace-of-ideas guy, Senator Hawley. I think you are to a large extent too. But on the show, we were discussing what I believe is a monster story that isn’t being discussed enough. The White House is directing Big Tech companies what they believe should or should not be happening in terms of speech. The government can’t do that directly.

You know this better than almost anybody because you are a legal scholar. But it’s even not allowed — and it should be called out more than it is for them — to use Big Tech to regulate in a way that they themselves would be unable to from a constitutional perspective. What do you think about what’s going on, and are we not giving enough attention to really what is a radical proposition that is being put forward by the Biden administration almost on a daily basis now as it pertains to Big Tech and regulations?

SEN. HAWLEY: It is absolutely radical, and you’re exactly right about it. And my view is that it is a profound threat to our constitutional norms and constitutional values. Clay, I can’t imagine just 20 years ago — barely a generation ago, I cannot imagine — an American president urging media companies, newspapers, television — which is the equivalent of today’s social media — urging them actively to censor viewpoints he doesn’t like and disagrees with. Can you imagine the outcry?

BUCK: It’s crazy.

SEN. HAWLEY: And now, now they’re doing it brazenly. I mean, now they’re using the bully pulpit of the White House in their tech companies with their public forums to shut out voices they disapprove of. And it’s not… They’ve been doing it to the right, they’ve been trying to censor the right for a long time but, you know, Joe Rogan, you could say a lot about Joe Rogan’s political views. I don’t think you can characterize him.

He’s certainly not a right winger. Let’s put this that way. The guy is fairly independent to his credit. You know, and I just think that the idea that the president would urge this, it just shows, I think, that this administration certainly — and unfortunately many on the left, the readers of the left — no longer believe in the fundamental principle of free speech. They don’t believe, Clay, what you alluded to just a second ago which is that the cure for speech that you don’t like or for speech that is inaccurate is more speech.

CLAY: Amen.

SEN. HAWLEY: You don’t throttle it down. You open it up. And this is why the whole idea that, “Well, if I don’t like I’ll call it misinformation and then I’ll censor it.” Oh, my gosh! That’s exactly what our First Amendment is designed to protect against. So I’m really worried about it — and also, you know, same thing is happening on campuses. But to come from the president, to come from the White House I think is really, really destructive and it’s really dangerous.

BUCK: Speaking to Josh Hawley, senator from the great state of Missouri. Senator Hawley, it seems more and more like the Biden administration is just running out of narrative. They are trying to convince people that the economy is great, they created all these jobs. It was all hinging, it seemed, on the Build Back Better plan.

Is there going to be a renewed effort in any serious way for that to pass before the midterm election? Because absent that, it just feels like failure is the only way to describe what we’ve seen so far and therefore a Democrat pivot is the only way they will be able to respond if they get crushed in the midterms — or that’s the way they should respond. How do you see this playing out? I know we’re early 2022, but it doesn’t seem like it’s gonna change anytime soon.

SEN. HAWLEY: Oh, and I don’t think that… Up here on Capitol Hill I can tell you they don’t think that they really have any problem. I mean, they think that what they’re doing is great, which shows you how out of touch they are with reality. This is the most unpopular administration of my lifetime. This president can hardly complete a sentence. It is stunning. It is scary.

And the American people are looks at agenda and they’re like, “Wow. You’re giving us inflation that is totally out of control. You’re giving us foreign policy disasters everywhere you turn — Afghanistan, China, Ukraine, and Russia — and this is a guy who he is leading this country into disaster after disaster,” and people don’t let it. They don’t want it.

But I think the Democrats — to answer the question, I think they’re just gonna try to forge ahead. And I don’t think they’ll accomplish much this year because they’re so internally divided. But the American people are getting a good look at Democrat leaders and what they want for this country. And what they want is a basically economic socialism combined with their hard-left wokeism when it comes to social policies — just radical stuff opinion –and the American people, they don’t want it, and in fact they hate it. That’s why Joe Biden’s so popular.

CLAY: Senator Hawley, couple of questions for you to close out. One, what happened on your Chiefs?

SEN. HAWLEY: Oh! (laughs) Oh.

CLAY: Two, second part of that that, did you see the mayor of Los Angeles saying that when he was getting his picture taken with Magic Johnson it wasn’t an issue with covid because he held his breath?

SEN. HAWLEY: (laughs)

CLAY: He was at the 49ers and Rams game. There’s video. That’s a direct quote from him. So I’ll let you first address the Chiefs collapse, and second, how good of a breath holder you might be and what that might mean for your future photographs.

SEN. HAWLEY: (laughing) Well, on the second part first, the hypocrisy on this is unbelievable. I don’t want you don’t want to call out any of my Senate colleagues by name. But I’ll just say the rank hypocrisy, to watch these people walk around with masks and then as soon as they get away from the cameras, to rip off their masks because it’s all theater?

CLAY: Oh yeah.

SEN. HAWLEY: It’s all theater — and for Joe Biden to be out there blaming folks who are unvaccinated and saying that they’re the reason the pandemic is raging? No, they’re not! We know that people who are vaccinated, fully vaccinated, can get covid and are. You know, through no fault of anybody’s own. The truth is in this administration, the hypocrisy, the failure to plan, it’s unbelievable. Okay, the Chiefs, though, I mean, you’re really kind of twisting the knife on that one.

CLAY: Well, look, I’m a Titans fan. We lost to the Bengals first.

SEN. HAWLEY: (laughing)

CLAY: So I’m still angry at Ryan Tannehill. So you’re better off than me ’cause at least you were in the AFC Championship Game.

SEN. HAWLEY: Fair enough. Fair enough. I just, you know… (sigh) I don’t want to be a Monday morning quarterback on ’em. Obviously, it was a disappointing loss. Let me put it this way. I’ll try to put it in a positive way. I thought the Bengals came out and did defensive adjustments after halftime. Particularly, I think, what they did with their safeties and getting to basically play one high, having one of the safeties come forward, do some spying — sort of clogging up that middle that Mahomes had been using really effectively in the first half — I thought that that was…

They do a good job. You know, they did a good job defensively and unfortunately we just didn’t find an answer to that until the end, too late in the game. I mean, just didn’t happen. So a lot of credit to them for their defensive adjustments. And, you know, and then offensively, obviously. I mean, the Bengals, they really got it going, and when you score — when you allow 21, I think, unanswered — that’s hard to do in an AFC Championship game (chuckling) and expect to win.

But listen that all sounds accuse negative. I’m really… I’m a huge Chiefs fan, lifelong Chiefs fan, will be forever, they had a great season. I wish they were gonna be playing a couple of Sundays from now, but you know what? They’re young, and I’ve gotten to know some of the players on the team. They’re great guys, and this will be a great learning experience and they’ll be back and better than ever.

CLAY: No doubt. Four straight AFC Championship Games. I bet he didn’t think use see that as a Chiefs fan.

SEN. HAWLEY: No.

CLAY: Good talking to you, Senator Hawley. We’ll talk to you again soon.

SEN. HAWLEY: Thank you.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

C&B Talk to Eric Flannery, D.C. Bar Owner Defying Mandates

3 Feb 2022

FLANNERY: Since I announced on Twitter, “Hey, this is what we’re going to do,” the Department of Health has been here four times. The ABA, which is the D.C. licensing agency, has been here eight or nine times. The government doesn’t send me a paycheck. I send the government money. I am not an agent of the government to do this. If they want to come down and check people’s medical status, they’re more than welcome to. I don’t have the people for that. I don’t know. I really don’t know. When people ask me, “When are you gonna get on the other side of this?” I don’t know. I just know that I’m doing the right thing, and this place is supposed to be open.

BUCK: That was Eric Flannery, owner of The Big Board, a bar in the H Street corridor of Washington, D.C., an area I know, actually, quite well. Eric is with us now, Eric Flannery, owner The Big Board. Sir, thanks for calling in.

FLANNERY: Thank you guys very much for having me on. I really appreciate it. I really do.

BUCK: You’re speaking to our people all across the country, Eric. Tell them what happened to your establishment in D.C., and what’s going on?

FLANNERY: So D.C. has now… They have revoked our liquor license, and they have come down and they’ve revoked our basic business license. So we’re not allowed to operate as an alcohol establishment or as any kind of establishment at all. They’ve done that based on the mayor’s order that all of my servers are required to wear masks at all times inside, and we are required to check people’s personal medical status when this come through.

BUCK: Can I ask you if your servers have to wear masks but not patrons, is that the way the rule goes in D.C.?

FLANNERY: So the patrons are supposed to wear them when they open up the door. When they get a glass of water, then they just take it off.

BUCK: It’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard, but it’s true it New York too. Clay, I know you’ve got a lot here.

CLAY: Yeah. So that means that your business is shut down and all of employees are now not able to work as well? What’s the timeframe under which you could potentially reopen? How does that work for you paying rent? What is the status here?

FLANNERY: So the… I’ve got a hearing coming up. I’ve still gotta negotiate with D.C. on this. This is a hearing of the ABR board of directors, which is the D.C. Alcohol Beverage Regulation Authority. And they have a meeting, they have a a team of people that is appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the city council who are going to hear the ideas behind this. They have to decide whether or not they think I can have my license restored. I then have to get my license restored at the Department of Health as well. I have not gotten far enough into that process to know how —

CLAY: All of your employees… Yeah. Sorry to cut you off. But all of your employees, the people who work, who I would guess, what, how many people do you employ, none of them are able to work or get a salary right now because you’re not allowed to open; correct?

FLANNERY: That’s correct — and, trust me, they want to work. They’re down there. They were having some of the most fun they’ve had in years over the last six months because it was such a long time of us being shut down that when we were open, they were ready and happy.

BUCK: We’re speaking to Eric Flannery, owner of The Big Board in H Street corridor of D.C., Washington, D.C. Eric, are the people coming in, the little commissars from the health department, are they at all sheepish? They must recognize at some level that the mask policy of employees but not patrons, that’s nothing to do with science. That’s moronic. Obviously, they’re penalizing you, but are they at least a little apologetic for how stupid they have to act in the name of the city of Washington, D.C.? And then also — we’ll get into how people can help you, but first talk about that. What’s it like dealing with these folks?

FLANNERY: I’m always perfectly nice to all of these, folks. I don’t say anything. They have misquoted me in a couple of the official documents that they submitted, where I was not allowed to review ’em. But I think what happens is they assign me with something that I’m not before they walk in so that they don’t have to feel bad about themselves for doing what they’re doing, which is shutting down a business where everybody is welcome.

CLAY: Eric, you’re supposed to be checking for vaccine cards, I suppose — or vaccine photos, cards, or whatever else — when you enter the business, my understanding is, in D.C. Are most businesses doing that? In your experience, does that have any impact at all, and what in the world process is there to eventually end a restriction like that?

FLANNERY: So there is… A lot of of the businesses aren’t doing it. You can read newspaper articles that 75% of the businesses in D.C. are not completing the requirements correctly. Two… I lost my train of thought there for —

CLAY: How do these processes end in right now you’re supposed to be checking vaccine cards and everybody has to be masked. Is this is a mayoral decision? Is there a body to appeal to? How does this process work?

FLANNERY: It’s a mayoral decision right now. On the mayoral order there is no end date to the mayoral order, and there is no exit criteria on the mayoral order.

CLAY: So in theory, it’s never ending.

FLANNERY: In theory it is never ending unless it is superseded by another document.

BUCK: So I just want to ask, how can folks if there’s anything anyway, can they help, can they stand with you? I know Senator Rand Paul has been trying to get attention for you standing up here for what is right. What can folks listening do?

FLANNERY: There’s a lot of things. What I tell people, if you’re in D.C., you can write to your… Do your good citizen stuff. Write to your city council member, write to the mayor, show up at the meeting, see what’s happened. And, more importantly, if you’re in D.C., read the mayoral order. I talked to so many people who are either with me or against me, and I ask them, have they read the mayoral order? It’s six and a half pages. That’s all it is. It’s six and a half pages. It does not have what is required to put the type of change in society, it doesn’t have the justification in that mayoral order.

BUCK: Tyranny is what it is. Eric Flannery of The Big Board in Washington, D.C., restaurateur. Sir, we wish you the best. Thanks for coming on the show. We appreciate it.

Recent Stories

Jack Carr Breaks Down the U.S. Strike on ISIS

3 Feb 2022

BIDEN: The United States military forces successfully removed a major terrorist threat to the world, a global leader of ISIS known as Hajji Abdullah. Knowing that this terrorist had chosen to surround himself with families, including children, we made a choice to pursue a Special Forces raid at a much greater risk than our — to our own people rather than targeting him with an air strike. We made this choice to minimize civilian casualties. Last night’s operation took a major terrorist leader off the battlefield, and it sent a strong message to terrorists around the world: We will come after you and find you.

BUCK: Welcome back to the Clay and Buck show. That was President Biden earlier today on the special operations raid that targeted ISIS leader Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi, who is somebody that I don’t think many folks out there had heard of and let you work in, you know, anti-ISIS targeting.

We want to bring somebody in to help us analyze what we know so far about this raid and just where we stand in the War on Terror as it is. Jack Carr is with us now. He’s a former Navy SEAL sniper and task unit commander with service in Iraq and Afghanistan. He’s also the best-selling author of The Terminal List series. His latest, In the Blood, is available for pre-order. Jack, thanks for being with us.

CARR: Oh, thanks for having me on.

BUCK: So you see this one, and this is some photos, some video, of the raid site. It’s a house in northwest Syria. Sent in apparently Apache gunships, Special Forces and/or special operations. I should say “units.” They didn’t really specify that much about who exactly was involved from what I’ve seen so far. He, the terrorist leader apparently detonated a suicide vest or detonated a bomb of some kind, killing a number of civilians. What do you make of this raid in terms of is this a successful raid? Did we want to actually capture and try to get intel? What are your thoughts?

CARR: Capture versus kill, you never know how that’s gonna play out these days especially in today’s political climate. So, you know, he took himself bookstore out the same with a that his predecessor, al-Baghdadi, did in 2019 with a suicide vest at least that’s what is being reported and took out his wife and some of his kids at the same time.

So what’s not really being focused on as much is that also a top lieutenant of his was killed in the raid by U.S. Special Operations Forces on another level of that house — and oftentimes that can be even more important than decapitating that head of the snake, to get that top lieutenant, essentially the COO, who is managing those day-to-day operations.

So we really took out two terrorists targets, did a proof of concept under this new administration, and interestingly enough, this terrorist leader was acting in a similar fashion to what bin Laden did: Staying in one place, not leaving his compound, not leaving his believe, only going up to the roof for some fresh air every now and again.

Which is different. If you remember, Yasser Arafat would change locations almost daily, at least every couple days. But it just shows how they’re adapting and how we need to adapt as well. But also, you know, we decided not to take him out with some sort of a strike that would put innocent civilians at more risk. And that’s what I saw during my time in Iraq and Afghanistan is that was a…

Whether it was us going in or it was some sort of an air strike that we were calling in, that was of the highest importance is to protect those civilians. So the other part of that is you can show a dead body. It can’t be spun as much as it could if you just have a demolished building where you say someone was killed. So you actually have a body; there’s proof of that death there.

And also safety of flight. Just getting to and from. We saw that helicopter had to be destroyed on target or close to the target, anyway. And it just goes to show that just getting to and from these locations is tough — and whether that means you’re on the ground somewhere moving in vehicles or you’re in the air.

That safety of flight is still so dangerous for everyone involved in these operations — and the specter of Desert One in 1980, Mogadishu, Black Hawk Down, the helicopter that crashed in the bin Laden raid, these things are always at the forefront of the planning for these types of operations.

CLAY: Jack, do we have any indications early on…? Certainly, we saw the terror attack that happened when 13 soldiers lost their lives in Afghanistan. Do we have any indications early on whether the new Taliban control in Afghanistan is increasing the overall reach of terrorist organizations in the Middle East or if the Taliban is actually doing some of what they said they would, which is preventing — at least in theory — the rise of ISIS? Do we have any indications right now how this is going?

CARR: That’s a tough one to evaluate. I hope we have people that are on this daily, and I hope we left behind human networks in Afghanistan. We were there for 20 years and, as you know, the intelligence services, part of what we do there is leave behind these long-term, deep-penetration type operations and that our sources are still solid.

After 20 years, I have to think that that is the case and that we’re getting some very good information back on that front. But there’s a lot to deal with over there. At the same time, without us being there daily and keeping that on their toes, I don’t see how they can’t be expanding outside-of-the region when it comes to building networks, adapting, and pushing that reach — whether it’s just regionally or virtually — in the countries that they are not very close to as far as proximity.

BUCK: We’re speaking to Jack Carr, former Navy SEAL, author of the Terminal List series. In the Blood, his latest, is available for pre-order. Jack, I want to ask, just yesterday, I believe… Clay, wasn’t yesterday the first day where they started to dismiss active-duty members of the military who refused to get the vaccine.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: As somebody who served and served in front-line combat roles — and I’m sure still has many brothers and sisters who are still in the Armed Services — what do you make of that?

CARR: It’s very disheartening that everything has become so politicized as far as this issue goes. “The science” thing, quote-unquote — the science — seems to be evolving, people at the senior levels don’t really have the greatest idea of what is happening with covid and its different iterations. So it’s just very disheartening to me that it’s politicized and that we are essentially targeting certain people and trying to move them out of different positions in government just because they have some questions about what I think still — as of today — is an experimental vaccine.

So just that it’s been politicized so much is disheartening. You saw that even a Navy chaplain wasn’t allowed not to take it for religious-exemption purposes. So when you have an actual chaplain, not just one you suspect might be (chuckles) just trying to get around some sort of a mandate. This is an actual chaplain that is in the Navy for this reason, not getting a religious exemption. It’s just disheartening to me that everything is so politicized on that front.

CLAY: Jack, when you look back to the raid in Syria and the killing of the ISIS operative, how do you value or weigh the cost of potential innocent life versus the benefit of being able to eliminate one of these top leaders of a terrorist organization? In other words, there’s the report that there might have been 10 people — women and children potentially — who died as a part of this raid, again early reports.

Is there a number when you’re experience as a Navy SEAL where you say, “Okay, it might be worth the risk of 10 other people dying, but it’s not worth a hundred.” How do you balance the risk versus the danger here of raids as it pertains to, quote-unquote, innocent life versus a terrorist target? What kind of balancing acts have you seen?

CARR: Yeah. So collateral damage is something that you hate to say “always,” but it is always a part of warfare. So that being said, my personal experience downrange in Iraq and Afghanistan was that if there was the (audio drop) dying (audio drop) operation that we could look at ahead of time, we wouldn’t do it. And that goes at every level, tactical, operational, strategic.

All of those levels were in alignment there, and I think that is really what one of the main things that differentiates us from our enemies. We maintain that moral high ground. We put thought into this. We put ourselves at risk so as to not hurt or kill innocent civilians to the best of our possible ability — and then you see our enemies. What do they do?

They detonate that suicide vest, kill their wife and children, both this latest target and al-Baghdadi before him. And even juxtapose that also very interestingly with bin Laden, who had time to prepare, who there were shots fired in the compound already. He had an AK in his room, and did not defend himself in the end like he asked so many others to do for him.

So very interesting these different leaders. But the last two — one last night and al-Baghdadi before him — they took the lives of innocent people where we do the exact opposite, and I think that is really the main differentiator between us and our enemy. We maintain that moral high ground every chance we get.

BUCK: Jack Carr, former Navy SEAL. Check out the Terminal List series and his latest, In the Blood, available for pre-order now. Great author and a great American. Jack, thanks for being with us.

CARR: Oh, thanks for having me on. You guys take care.

CLAY: Good stuff, as always.

Recent Stories

DeSantis Campaign Produces Phenomenal Flip-Flop Fauci Ad

3 Feb 2022

CLAY: Lots of talk of late about what’s going on with misinformation and disinformation. You’ve certainly heard those terms great deal. A lot of people, including this show, have been pointing out that some of the foremost proponents of misinformation and disinformation are the CDC, are their allies at MSNBC and also at the Washington Post and the New York Times and CNN.

They have consistently spread falsehoods that have later been proven to be untrue. Worse than that, they have not allowed you or me or many of us to adequately debate whether or not what they are spreading is accurate or not. Well, a lot of people have been unwilling to engage in this battle. One of them that has been willing, Ron DeSantis. Here is a flip-flop Fauci take from Ron DeSantis group. I think you’re gonna enjoy it. Listen:

BUCK: Perfect, Clay.

CLAY: Right?

BUCK: He’s such an evil little apparatchik, such a tyrant in a lab coat. And the fact that people still listen to this guy at all… I love when people say, “Oh, but, you know, I’m just listening to what Fauci says and what the CDC says.” No person who is able to think for themselves believes that that’s an argument anymore.

No person who actually pays attention to reality, recent history, and data thinks that, “Oh, but this is what Rochelle Walensky and Fauci and the others are telling us,” because they’re a bunch of jackass bureaucrats. Let’s be honest. They did what they had to do to keep the Democrats happy and keep getting invited on CNN, as if that’s something to be proud of.

And here we are seeing the results of it now. What do they actually do? We looked at lockdowns. That was obviously a disaster. I think you’re gonna see that almost nothing, almost nothing that we were made to go through actually made a damn bit of difference and created a tremendous amount of downside for everyone, created a tremendous amount of strife.

CLAY: How do we get rid of Fauci? We had Rand Paul and we had this debate last week or the week before, and he said he believed a red wave — which, to be quite honest, that’s reason enough in my opinion to vote Republican, just to get rid of Dr. Fauci. But, Buck, do you think that Fauci will resign if Republicans take back control of the House and Senate and start to grill him on the specifics of his behavior, his actions?

BUCK: Yes, and I’m gonna say this right now: If Republicans take the House and they take the Senate and they do this old, “Oh, we just want to look forward. We don’t want to make problems for Fauci,” I’m going to call them out on this show. I’m going to lose my mind on them a little bit because it’s unacceptable. We need accountability, all right? And we need accountability as soon as we can get it, and that means Fauci gets called out and gets fired. That’s what has to happen. But we’ll see. He’ll resign before he gets fired.

Recent Stories

Credit to All the Kids Standing Up to Mask Insanity

3 Feb 2022

CLAY: I want to give some credit here to all of the kids in Northern Virginia who are standing up against the absurd decisions being made regarding masks in schools. Even USA Today, which is probably the least threatening entirely of all the media sources out there — USA Today, least controversial, least threatening — they’ve got an article on their editorial page today saying it’s time to end masks in schools.

But the people in Northern Virginia — and maybe it’s because Buck’s point on this — they’re so unwilling to acknowledge that they might be wrong and that all those awful right wingers who are actually looking at the data and making the argument against masks are correct, they’re doubling and tripling down in the face of all of the science pointing out that masks don’t make sense. Here’s the Loudoun County assistant principal Janet Davidson. She’s informing parents, children who come back to school maskless will be charged with the crime of trespassing. Listen:

DAVIDSON: Until you arrive, your children will be held in an in-school restriction situation here at school. Uhh, it is important that I point out to you stated in what you’ll receive — it’s important that I point out to you — that they are not allowed on campus or on Loudoun County public school property. Starting tomorrow, it will be considered trespassing. So it’s important that I make that statement to you. The guidelines that we’re receiving from the county is student suspensions will end as soon as they are fully following mitigation policies.

BUCK: Can I say, Clay, first of all, these people, there’s something wrong with them. They’re mandating child abuse — and now beyond this, they’re acting in a way that makes people who are paying attention say, “Maybe we should just, like, tear the public school system down to the studs and start from scratch.”

There’s people that are watching this and listening to this and gotta be saying to themselves, “This is just outrageous beyond anyone’s expectations of how crazy they’ll be.” I mean, trespassing? Really? You’re gonna go there with kids who won’t wear masks? Keep in mind these are all adults who are going into restaurants without masks on. Children are interacting with each other without masks on all the time outside of school.

And yet here we are — and this is in Virginia, it’s not even in D.C. which is even loonier. They’re acting like they’re the good people here. And as I’ve said, the data and as we know the data is very clear that masks do not do a damn thing in schools. And you mentioned all the countries in Europe that are getting rid of all of covid restrictions.

And they’re sounding, by the way, not like they’re… You know, Fauci always says “relax restrictions.” Whenever they say that, that’s a tell. It means, “Okay, we’ll give you back a little freedom now but just know that we may take that away from you whenever we say so.” I think there are some other places that realize, “This just was all idiocy. This was all wrong.” And to the point how they don’t want to admit we were right about the masking? Yeah, I mean, the audience at MSNBC and CNN, they think the anchors they’re watching are smarter than you and me and they’re wrong. So this is the reality we’re dealing with.

CLAY: And very often — and let’s keep in mind here the Loudoun County vice principal there is directly contradicting the order from the governor of Virginia, which did not say you couldn’t wear a mask. It just said you got to choose. So all he did was end the mandate. If you still are convinced that masks work — despite the fact that there’s no evidence they do, by the way — you have the right to put your kid in a mask.

You have the right to wear a mask. And, by the way, I want to give a shout-out here to Washington State, where a student leader is addressing an organized maskless school protest. We need more kids looking at the science and standing up to. Listen to this.

WASHOUGAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT: Our hope is we can get this statewide. Now, I might get in trouble for this, but the plan still stands for Wednesday — for tomorrow, I mean. Everybody is gonna meet at the back row of the senior parking lot and we’re all walking into the school with no mask on. You can get me in trouble. They can suspend me. I don’t care. We’re done with this — and obviously all of you are too.

Obviously all you are done with the masks too. Now, again we’re doing this peacefully and respectfully. If a staff member asks you to put a mask on, you say, “No, thank you” and keep walked — and if they kick you out, then go home. And if people need rides home, then some of the seniors, I’m sure we could start giving people rides home.

BUCK: I want to find out who this kid is, Clay, so we can give him… First of all, he’s a senior so I think he’s probably 18. But just listening to him, I want to put on a helmet and shoulder pads and start tackling some libs. Like, I’m fired up.

CLAY: Well, this is what true teenage rebellion (chuckles) should be! What has been so frustrating to me is so many of these college kids are demanding more substantial regulation. They’re having protests to make the school require them to wear a mask, require them to get the covid shot — and it, to me, is the very antithesis of what teenage rebellion should be. I expected statements like this from kids long before now.

They’ve been wearing masks now in school for two years. And just now are kids saying, “Hey, you know what…?” I mean, I hope they’re looking at the data and recognizing it. But just now are they finally saying, “Hey, you know what? We’re gonna stand up against this?”

Recent Stories

Why the Democrats Can’t Stand Tulsi Gabbard

3 Feb 2022

TULSI GABBARD: Freedom of speech is being threatened. People are being intimated. Their financial security is being threatened. They are being censored or being intimidated into censoring themselves. If the powers that be decide, “Well, if we don’t like the things that you’re saying then we will find a way to silence you and censor you.”

This is something that every single American should be afraid of because we need to have the confidence in America that we can express ourselves, that we have the freedom to speak without the threat of punishment looming over us. That right there is literally the difference between living in a democracy or living in a dictatorship.

BUCK: Tulsi Gabbard there — absolutely right — and I’ve said this in the past and I really stand behind it and think that it’s even more true over time. The reason that there was always some animus on the left, the reason the Democrats, some of them, have always hated Tulsi Gabbard in some way is because she doesn’t hate Republicans. She’s not a hateful person.

She is a left-of-center politician but served her country, loves her country, and is willing to talk to the other side and for a contingent, one that I would argue is really the vanguard of the Democrat Party these days that in itself — you’re platforming them! — is unacceptable. And I think Tulsi, Clay, is in the same line here or same group of individuals who…

Joe Rogan is there. I would say look at the Canadian truckers. People who don’t fit neatly into a specific political category who are just like good folks. And it’s fascinating how much the current Democrat apparatus goes after them and is so nasty about them, you know? You can’t just say, “Oh, those are good people.” Think about this. Truckers, good people. Tulsi, good people. Joe Rogan, good people. And they hate them for it.

CLAY: Yeah, and Tulsi is what is rare now: A rational Democratic voice. You can agree or disagree, again, on policy-related terms, but everything she says is eminently reasonable. Now, you may have a difference of opinion on a variety of different issues, but this used to be how we debated issues in the country. It was somewhat reasonable people in the middle part of their parties conversed, interacted, and tried to make the best decisions for the country going forward. The Democratic Party has gone so haywire. They talk a lot about January 6th and how the Republican Party has gone out of whack. I think, Buck, if you look at where Republicans are today versus 2000, it’s not that different, compared to where Democrats are. It’s wildly different.

Recent Stories

WH Demands Big Tech Censorship, Lib Artists Salute

3 Feb 2022

CLAY: So, this a big story. Joe Rogan, we’ve talked a lot about the rise of cancel culture and the continued influence of it. Whoopi Goldberg gets suspended for two weeks for her stupidity on The View. What’s going on that I believe is the most significant aspect of everything relating to cancel culture is Big Tech is being directly commanded by the White House, by the federal government to do things that the federal government itself cannot do.

And let me explain what I mean by that. If Jen Psaki came out and said, “Joe Rogan’s podcast is banned because we don’t like what he says on it,” or if she came out and said, “Clay and Buck is banned to air on airwaves because we don’t like the topics and conversations that they are having,” that would be 100% a violation of the First Amendment because the government can’t censor speech from private actors it doesn’t like in that context.

And the government knows that. But what is occurring is more insidious, Buck, than that. What the government is doing is they’re going to Facebook — which, by the way, dropping 25% today in the stock market after missing earnings. That’s a big story in and of itself about the social media universe and maybe these companies are not as powerful and strong as we thought, which is maybe why they’re more susceptible to listen to the federal government than many people would have anticipated.

But we know, ’cause Jen Psaki has been lecturing us from the White House press briefing and saying, “Hey, we’ve been providing a list of accounts that we don’t like that are spreading what we’re calling misinformation, and we’re asking Facebook and Twitter and Instagram and TikTok or whoever else it might be to pull the influence and/or the posts that we don’t like.”

That is an attempt to get around the First Amendment, Buck, while using the power of government to regulate speech in a way that is directly constitutionally forbidden, and I think it should be — it should be — forbidden in general. Now, here’s Jen Psaki speaking specifically to Joe Rogan. Listen to what she said.

PSAKI: Well, last July, (sputters) you probably know, but the Surgeon General also took the unprecedented step to issue an advisory on the risk of misinformation in public health which is a very significant step. And admit that he talked about the role social media platforms have. So our hope is that all major tech platforms — and all major news sources, for that matter — be responsible and vigilant to ensure the American people have access to accurate information on something as significant as covid-19. That certainly includes Spotify. So this disclaimer is a positive step, but we want every platform to continue doing more to call out mis- and disinformation while also uplifting accurate misinformation.

BUCK: It is absolutely not the role of our government to be trying to combat “misinformation” among the American people. Like this notion they’re supposed to be tracking down and eliminating misinformation? Just start from that premise. That’s not their job. We don’t need them trying to tell us where the misinformation is or whatever. That’s not…

They’re allowed to present their point of view, of course, which what they do all the time. They present propaganda. They’re allowed to convince people or try to convince people of the rightness or wrongness of different policies and ideas. But, Clay, they really think they’re on a seek-and-destroy mission against misinformation, and the great irony of this of course is that the White House itself has been a tremendous purveyor of misinformation the entire time.

Joe Biden’s walking around calling this for months a pandemic of the unvaccinated. That is a lie, as anybody, including me — who got vaccinated and then got sick — can tell you, it is not a pandemic of the unvaccinated. But he kept saying it and saying it. The media apparatus — including social media — that the White House is calling on to take action here — and, by the way, this is just back-door censorship is all and really right now with Jen Psaki calling for it.

CLAY: Front-door censorship.

BUCK: Front door. This is like going right in, sitting down in the kitchen and demanding censorship. It’s exactly what they’re doing, and it just goes to show you how corrupt and venal our media really is that they won’t actually stand up and say, “Hold a second.” The lifeblood of what we do — whether you’re a social media company or a traditional news media company, Clay — is free speech and the freedom to share ideas.

If freedom of speech does not mean the right to say things that are unpopular, that the government does not like, that the government would say is misinformation — that the government would even say is dangerous — there’s no such thing as free speech. We don’t need free speech for, “Joe Biden’s amazing,” because we know they’re grown clap for that. We need free speech for the Fauciite apparatus of the federal government has been a catastrophic failure that has resulted — as we see from the Johns Hopkins study about lockdowns — in an enormous destruction of people’s lives with no benefit.

CLAY: That’s why the marketplace of ideas is so important, in all facets of life. And also, Buck, what you’re seeing is, the creep of censorship into artists. I’m not sure we’ve ever seen anything like this in America, and let me explain what I mean. It used to be that most artists supported the free expression of other artists. Now, you might be, let’s say, back in the day, remember 2 Live Crew and the questions of whether or not their rap lyrics were obscenity?

I don’t remember very many other artists… Let’s say you were a rock artist. Let’s say you were a… Let’s say you were a R&B artist or whatever you might be. I don’t remember any other artists in the creative endeavors saying, “We need to make sure that other people cannot hear this music.” What is happening now is, all of these aging rockers that are saying, “Hey, you have to pull Joe Rogan off of Spotify…”

They are embracing the censorship of other people who are in a creative industry — and look. This is really unheard of. For instance, right now there’s all these debates about whether or not books should be banned. And recently the Seattle, To Kill a Mockingbird — Maus here in my home state of Texas, which is what got Whoopi Goldberg all caught up, and that’s an interesting conversation in and of itself.

BUCK: But “banned,” to be fair, it’s about curriculum, right? They’re not banned it. They’re not doing book burnings and saying, “You can’t have it,” just to be clear, right? If you’re trying to teach 12-year-olds critical race theory, Clay, and they say, “Hold on, this book is garbarge. Why is this being taught?” you’re not banning. You’re making editorial decisions.

CLAY: Yes. Right. And the easy analogy I think for people out there who are parents, I ban my kids from watching R-rated movies. That’s not me banning R-rated movies in general.

BUCK: Exactly.

CLAY: It’s just my belief is that based on their age, it’s age inappropriate. That’s the entire purpose of the Motion Picture Rating System in general, from G to R or X or whatever it might be, that’s a function of the age range that is appropriate to be able to consume a particular content. But, Buck, what is scary to me is the creative industry itself coming out against Joe Rogan in his own creativity.

And we’ve seen this with comics, right? There are comics that will turn on other comics. We saw it happen with Dave Chappelle. We haven’t seen it that much with authors saying, “Hey, I agree this book shouldn’t be widely distributed; people shouldn’t read this.”

But when you’ve got creative people turning against other creative people and saying their content should not be able to be consumed, that combined with the environment that the United States government is trying to create, frankly, Buck, in my life, I don’t ever remember a situation such as this.

BUCK: So I will give a point of view here that I haven’t really seen anywhere else but I’ll say this. People will say things to me. My first ever job in media technically was when I was an 18-year-old intern at CBS Evening News with Dan Rather. And I saw at 18 years old ’cause I was a, you know, National Review-reading, Rush-listening, Drudge Report on my home page — although Drudge has changed in recent years. He used to be a great guy.

I was like, “Okay. So this is a propaganda network. At 18, I could kind of tell,” and people would say to me, “Oh, but back in the Cronkite days…” No, it was lib then too. It just there just wasn’t anyone to point it out. There was no alternative. Now, it was less lib ’cause the Democrat Party hadn’t moved as far left, but it had always been pushing for one side. It had always been one perspective on America.

I think that there might be a little bit of a rethink, if you will, about a lot of these “rebels.” What was it? Who were the old guys that do the guitar? Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young. They’ve come out now too these are people that you associate with the sixties and the anti-war movement and all the rest of it. Yeah, they’re kind of just people of the left who wanted to overthrow the existing power structure and replace it with one that they like.

They’re actually not real rebels when you look at how this as evolved over time. When I say “they,” I’m talking about the ones that are coming out now and speaking about these issues. Bruce Springsteen, huge lib, Born in the USA, not particularly patriotic song. You go down the list, you see all these guys, I think that there should be…

You look back at what we believe, which are these artists who are big free speech people… We’ve seen the change in Howard Stern. So was he about free speech or was free speech something he believed in when he was breaking down doors with it for his even career? ‘Cause he doesn’t seem to believe in it anymore when it comes to the vaccine.

It feels like once the apparatus was overthrown for some of these people and they had their way or they had their success, now they want to pull the ladders up and prevent other people from following or have the same rights and have the same freedoms? So I don’t know. There’s that, and then there’s also Mary Trump, Clay.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: Her podcast, which if Spotify isn’t gonna… Oh, wait. The Mary Trump was amazing ’cause I think… I wish we could see those numbers. I bet that you could count on two hands the number of people that listen to the Mary Trump podcast, probably, but then there was —

CLAY: Mary Trump lost in a big way when her was it her uncle or whatever — when Trump — lost the election in 2020, her entire — ’cause I think she sold a million copies of whatever book she wrote. She made a ton of money. And if he were still in my office, she would be the Trump family member who’s telling the truth and there’d be Resistance people who cared. When he lost the 2020 election, her ability to make an earning — to make anything… I agree with you. It would be phenomenal to see how many people are actually downloading her podcast.

BUCK: It’s probably as popular as the Clinton Global Initiative after Hillary lost the election. “I thought it was all about charity,” said the idiots. But I would also put this out there. The fact that the Harry and Meghan Markle are (laughing) like, “We’re gonna pull our podcast too!”

CLAY: How about the fact that Harry and Meghan Markle can’t even manage to get a podcast started? It’s not as if sometimes it takes a long time to get a movie or a television show.

BUCK: These aren’t hardworking, folks.

CLAY: That’s what I’m saying. All you need is about a couple of thousand dollars in gear and plug it in. I’m sure they have a staff that would make all that possible, and you sit down and talk for like an hour. This is not the equivalent of splitting the atom here and they paid ’em $100 million or something, didn’t they? And they can’t even produce a podcast.

BUCK: I’ll say this. The one thing about radio, the one thing about podcasting: You can’t have it ghost voiced. You have to actually do it. You can’t just pay someone else to pretend that you did it. That’s a whole other thing which I also disagree with —

CLAY: I bet they done… Do you think they’ve done versions of the podcast and it’s just a total disaster and theism it hasn’t been distributed?

BUCK: Oh, yeah, probably.

CLAY: Do you think Prince Harry would be great a conducting an interview? What has ever occurred that made you think, “You know who would really be a great person to have a conversation with? Prince Harry. That seems like a guy who’s got a lot of interesting things to say!”

BUCK: There should be a help line for anyone to call in when they realize that they even thought for a second that they should listen to the Harry and Meghan Markle podcast.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: Like, that’s a cry for help. What’s going on there?

CLAY: I remember a great story Dan Patrick who did sports talk radio still does for a long time. He said, “Everybody thinks radio’s easy,” and he said every now and then they would give away the ability for somebody to come in and, like, sit, costar for a show for charity purposes. And he said seeing them sweating bullets. They tell every story they’ve ever had. They tell every opinion they’ve ever had.

At the end of a three-hour show, they’re drenched in sweat; they’re overcome with the intensity and emotion of it, and then you say, “Okay, gotta come back for three more hours every day for the next 20 years,” and all of a sudden they realize what is entailed in the job. And I think that’s probably what happened to Harry and Meghan. They’re like, “Oh, this will be easy to do.” Of course, it’s not even live which makes it that much easier. But they can’t even accomplish it.

Recent Stories

CNN’s Camerota Mourns Zucker: “This Feels Wrong”

3 Feb 2022

CLAY: This is pretty crazy to me. They actually had a segment on air discussing Zucker leaving CNN. I want to play this cut for you of one of their anchors — I believe her name is Alisyn Camerota — saying it feels wrong that two consenting adults can’t have a private relationship. Listen to this.

CAMEROTA: I feel it deeply personally, but also, I think I speak for all of us and our colleagues. This is an incredible loss. It’s an incredible loss. Zeff is a remarkable person and an incredible leader. He has this uncanny ability to make, I think, every one of us feel special and valuable in our own way, even though he is managing an international news organization of thousands of people.

VOICE: Mmmfph!

CAMEROTA: I just know that he had this unique ability to make us feel special and I don’t think that that comes around all the time, and I think again it’s an incredible loss, and I just think it’s so regrettable how it happened.

VOICE: Mmmfph!

CAMEROTA: If — if what you’re reporting is true, these are two consenting adults who are both executives.

VOICE: Mmm!

CAMEROTA: That th-th-th-they (sputters) can’t have a private relationship feels wrong.

CLAY: That’s not wrong at all. Okay, I did labor and employment law for a fairly decent amount of time, Buck. I would actually investigate sexual harassment claims inside of companies, and so I would go interview everybody. I would interview potential witnesses. I would try to determine what happened inside of a company. So that CNN would go on and have this saying “it feels wrong”?

Look, you have the guy who was in charge of everybody’s salary, of everybody’s employment at CNN. He doesn’t have the ability to elevate a woman that he’s sleeping with without having other corporate executives aware of what’s going on, and have a secret relationship with her. I mean, this is not permissible. Now, if he wanted to say, “Hey, we’re in a relationship, we’re disclosing it,” I’m all in favor of it, he specifically lied about this and chose not to do it.

And, Buck, I think the evidence is gonna show that he actually hired her from Andrew Cuomo’s office to come work at CNN after they were already in a relationship, which means he hired his girlfriend. What if you were trying to get one of these jobs that she got instead? You had absolutely no ability to compete for this.

So the fact that they would trot out anchors who would say, “Oh, this feels wrong to me,” when you lie… When you run a company and you lie about people who work for you, that you are in a relationship with, you are destroying any element of trust that could exist as it pertains to your ability to fairly judge that woman or that man if it were in reverse. We’re not talking about somebody who’s a PA on a show, some 23-year-old who doesn’t have a lot of power. We’re talking about the person who runs the network, Buck, the guy who decides whether or not people get hired and fired.

BUCK: Jeff Zucker, if he wanted you to have a show at CNN, you had a show. If he wanted you to make $3 million a year, that’s what you made. If he wanted you to make $7 million a year, that’s what you made or whatever the case may be. And so when you have that level of power inside an institution of that kind of reach and such as we can sit around, and should, make fun of how…

CNN’s American domestic audience is tiny. Unfortunately, it’s still a very large global brand. One of the things that angers me the most about CNN is when I was in Beijing a couple of years ago, remember the only English-language channel I could get in the hotel room was CNN International. It is like the Chinese Communist Party set up an anti-American propaganda channel.

“Trump about to start a war in Iran! Trump about to start a war in North Korea!” This is during the Trump presidency, obviously, and what CNN International pushes all over the world is effectively anti-Americanism which is appalling but they do it — and then CNN.com is also, unfortunately, still a big site. So this got a lot of reach, a lot of funding.

And because we’re just waking up now on the right to the difference in how, you know, brand association — you know, Mercedes-Benz, you know, Google, you know, whatever — they’ll advertise on CNN, but, oh, conservative media, that’s too… You know, that’s toxic, that’s dangerous for us; so CNN also gets a premium.

So it’s a very wealthy, very influential media company despite the fact that it sucks and is bad at everything and is dishonest. And so I just think that now as you see this, you realize the rot was from the top, as is so often the case in places like this, and when other news organizations have come under fire, other situations like this, CNN, if it’s not Democrats, they’re very smug about it, very high and mighty.

They were frauds. This was going on for years, years, Clay, years and year and, by the way, everyone who knows this building — and I’m gonna start reaching out to some of my sources. I’m a little busy in Miami right now but I’ll reach out to people this weekend. This is the tip of the iceberg, folks. When Jeff Zucker is doing something like this what do you think other guys who are trying to leverage or women, by the way, leverage their position, too, to elevate themselves professionally inside that institution. All kinds of shenanigans were happening there. Get ready for some big lawsuits.

CLAY: Not only that, Buck — and I think this goes for people out there listening, like, “Why does this matter?” I think the biggest power nowadays when it comes to institutions like CNN, the New York Times, Washington Post, also MSNBC. Their leadership — and Jeff Zucker was leader at CNN — they get to decide which stories matter.

Remember there was a story, I think it was from Project Veritas, about how Zucker had the morning meeting to discuss what the news of the day was, and he effectively just said, “This Hunter Biden story is not news. We’re not going to cover it.” They ignored it because they knew it hurt Joe Biden and they wanted Joe Biden to be elected president. That’s an incredible amount of power to bring to bear in a situation like that.

Recent Stories

The Devastating Fall of the Anti-Trumpers

3 Feb 2022

BUCK:  So Avenatti, fair to say, fallen from lib grace. I think that’s a fair point to make. That guy was on TV… The only human being I have seen on TV almost as much as Fauci at CNN was Michael Avenatti. I mean, that guy lived in the CNN greenroom, and they were always giving him a back rub on air. It was gross. It was just, “Oh, you’re a hero!”

He’s disgusting. The guy’s a slimeball. Everybody knows it. Again, our buddy Tucker used to call him “Creepy Porn Lawyer” early on before the criminal charges came out against Avenatti. And so, once again, he was astute in that observation. But Avenatti has fallen completely by the wayside, Clay, as we know. Cuomo became — not only Chris but also Andrew — big heroes of the left.

Big anti-Trumpers, completely fallen and collapsed, and now Jeff Zucker too. It’s almost like every person… I’m probably even forgetting a couple of the great heroes of anti-Trumpism from the left. I know there’s one that should come to mind right now that’s not, and people are probably yelling, “Buck, but what about…?” Text me or Google… (chuckles) Text me. Google me and I’ll… Good grief.

CLAY: What, are you an old man? You don’t even know how to communicate?

BUCK: Sorry. (laughing) That was a blooper. That was a blooper for me.

CLAY: “Pull out the phones, and the phones — send me a voicemail.”

BUCK: I meant to say Twitter. Tweet me. But here is Stelter — speaking of anti-Trumpism — over at CNN trying to make sense of what happened here and the way this all went down. Play 17.

STELTER: The Chris Cuomo effort. Cuomo was fired in December, and he is not going out quietly. He was fired and there were reports that he wasn’t gonna get paid the millions of dollars that were gonna be on the remainder of his contract. So as a source said to me earlier today, “He was trying to burn the place down.” He was going to court trying to burn the place down and claiming that he had incriminating information about Zucker and Gollust.

So if that’s the case, this is the domino effect that begins with Andrew Cuomo going down the governor’s office, and then Chris Cuomo being fired from CNN, and then Jeff Zucker losing his job at CNN. That is a remarkable domino effect, the chain of events. I think that is part of the story.

CLAY: You would have to be so dumb if you are Brian Stelter and you didn’t know this relationship was going on between Jeff Zucker and the senior VP of marketing and PR at CNN. So I think you have to consider this — and, by the way, in general, right, consenting adults should be able to do whatever consenting adults want to do, right? That’s my position.

But there are a lot of details, I think, still to come out about this relationship. If you hire your significant other and bring that person in to work with you and you don’t disclose that you are doing that, that is a direct attack about the legitimacy of your reign. But also, it’s a direct attack upon everyone else who’s not sleeping with you.

Do you think that might have some impact overall in who gets promoted at CNN? Right? So Brian Stelter is, I believe, a complete and total liar whether he’s claiming, “Hey, well, this came out because Chris Cuomo got fired and he decided he knew something.” No. Everybody in a prominent position at CNN, I believe, either knew or had strong suspicions about this relationship. I don’t think you could hide it.

There were articles… Katie Couric wrote about it in her book. There were articles about fights that they had gotten into publicly where they were yelling at each other, and it didn’t feel like a business-based spat. It felt like a lovers’ quarrel. So Stelter now — did you see this story too, Buck? — supposedly RadarOnline broke the story of this relationship, right?

Supposedly the day before the RadarOnline basically was going to break this story, Stelter went on social media and started attacking RadarOnline for not being reliable. Are you telling me that’s totally coincidental and had nothing to do with the fact that they were about to run a story attacking Jeff Zucker, his patron saint, the reason he has a show?

BUCK: So CNN for a while has been essentially a like a Mafia of beta males over there. I mean, so you’ve got Stelter and all these other —

CLAY: That’s a fantastic line.

BUCK: Why, thank you, sir.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: And they all owe their careers to Zucker and people like Brian? Brian Stelter’s not getting a TV show anywhere else, folks, and I don’t think Brian Stelter’s keeping his TV show in a post-Zucker era. But that’s also how he’s able to get away with doing this for so long. Now, to your point about the consenting adults, sure, that’s true. And by the way, no one’s claiming there’s any, you know, any sort of criminal impropriety here at all.

CLAY: No. I bet there’s some improprieties inside CNN that might come out as a result of all these investigations Chris Cuomo has gotten involved.

BUCK: True. But I’m just saying with Zucker right now there’s been no allegation of anything other than this is corporate civil or civil case kind of impropriety. And it’s obvious that this is what was going on there for a long time, but beyond that, CNN is so high and mighty —

CLAY: No doubt.

BUCK: — and sanctimonious about harassment issues and #MeToo and women in the workplace and all this stuff all the time. And the whole place is a fraud.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: And this is what I think is so important. They’re a fraud when it comes to journalism. They’re a fraud when it comes to women in the workplace and #MeToo and whatever. Brooke Baldwin. (laughing) I’m gonna say it: You remember Brooke.

CLAY: They banned me for life for saying I believe in the First Amendment and boobs.

BUCK: I know Brooke, and she’s a nice lady. I should get you two out for coffee sometime. She left because it was so much of a boys club, and I think she probably knew all about this. I’d be very curious to see if she had any thoughts about the situation at CNN now that it’s all come out.

CLAY: We should invite her on. We could get back together again, me and Brooke.

BUCK: You want a beer summit? I could arrange a Brooke and Clay beer summit’ you guys could be friends. And, by the way, I think your ban is gone, Clay, but obviously you’re a Fox talent now, but I don’t think that CNN, in the post-Zucker era — ’cause that was when Zucker was running the place.

CLAY: No you’re right. I think the ban is probably gone but I work at Fox News so I can’t go on to a competitor, obviously.

BUCK: Can I just say my essential point here was just — and just why I’m babbling about Brooke and all this stuff. Babbling Brooke. Look what I just did there. Sorry. The truth here is the whole thing…

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: I had a lot of coffee today. Black Rifle Coffee. The whole thing was a fraud, the whole thing. CNN, it’s not a journalistic enterprise, they don’t actually care about, you know, women and empowerment and me too and feminism and all that stuff. The whole thing’s just a big lib fraud of self-congratulation and overpaid babies. That’s what CNN is.

CLAY: Buck, I’ve always argued, male feminists are claiming to be male feminists because it’s the only way they think they can get girls. Right? Be very careful. If you are a woman out there and you meet a man and he’s like, “I’m such a huge feminist,” I would be very untrustworthy of that man compared to a normal dude, right? You go out on a date and you’re like, “Hey, what do you like to do?” “I’m just really into feminism.”

That dude is trying to cover something up. What I have seen time after time is the people who have the most to cover, what do they do, Buck? They try to pretend that they are the most saintly out there. They are the ones that are trying to cover up deep, dark issues. I think there’s a lot of deep, dark issues inside of CNN would be my bet.

BUCK: We will hold up the mirror to CNN, friends. We will not back away from this one because think about how much they did to undermine the duly elected president for four years and how much they were willing to show up on Trump supporters’ lawns — random people — humiliate them. It is an evil enterprise, and it needs reform at a minimum. Reform is the polite way of saying it.

Recent Stories

L.A. Mayor Garcetti Should Be Removed Based On This Audio

3 Feb 2022

CLAY: There’s been a lot of stupidity — I mean, an awful lot of stupidity — over the past couple of years surrounding covid. But you guys know we talked about this on Monday. The mayor of San Francisco, London Breed; the mayor of Los Angeles, Eric Garcetti; and the governor of California, Gavin Newsom, all attended the 49ers game against the Rams, the NFC Championship Game in L.A. at SoFi Stadium.

And all three of them were pictured without masks with Magic Johnson, former Laker basketball star. Now, Magic Johnson, of course, has HIV; so he would be, in theory, the definition of someone who is immunocompromised. All of them have tried to explain themselves away. Gavin Newsom said he only took his mask off for a few seconds.

By the way, we’ve learned — according to Democratic politicians — that when you get a picture taken, covid can’t spread. That seems to be their position because they’re always saying, “Oh, we just took the masks off for a couple minutes,” same thing CNN staffers said, by the way. Eric Garcetti broke a new stupidity level here. He said that he held his breath while he got his photo taken with Magic Johnson so there was no risk.

Listen to this answer.

GARCETTI: I wore my mask the entire game, and I — when people asked for a photograph, I hold my breath, and I put it here and people could see that. There’s a 0% chance of infection from that.

CLAY: (laughing) Buck, he held his breath! Does that mean that, like, if you are really one of these deep-sea divers and you just hold your breath better than almost anyone in the world, that you don’t theoretically ever have to wear a mask, right? This is one of the dumbest answers of all time.

BUCK: I don’t even know if we could sit here and laugh without at least the possibility that in a week or two Fauci would be like (impression), “I have an announcement, forget double masking. I want half freezing. I would like for mitigation purposes to limit the droplet dispersal by having everyone hold their breath to least 10, perhaps 15 — and if you go to 30 and pass out, that’s not good, so please stop at 20.” Is there anything that is too stupid for these people? I just have to wonder. Is anything too dumb for the Fauciites? I don’t think so.

CLAY: “I didn’t inhale” now has competition. That depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is. This is so stupid. This is so dumb that if I were a resident of Los Angeles, if I lived in L.A. County, I would want the mayor fired on the spot. I’m sure there are a lot of vice mayors out there. Somebody could step up, probably not be as dumb.

But, Buck, this is having consequences in L.A. The L.A. Times had a big article today saying that in the wake of the mayor’s stupidity and the picture of the governor inside of SoFi Stadium at the game, many parents out there are saying, “Wait a minute. You’re requiring my kids to wear masks; you are posing for photographs with Magic Johnson.

“There is no legitimacy whatsoever any longer to a mask requirement in L.A.,” and I think this hypocrisy is really cutting through even, Buck, in L.A., which is obviously a left-leaning state. Remember, more people in California voted for Donald Trump than voted for Donald Trump in Texas. Now, that’s the partly a function of population. But there’s a lot of sane people in California, too.

BUCK: I think so much of this now has come down to there’s the brainwashed folks, and they’re gonna take years. They’re traumatized by Fauci in a way, and I don’t think we can reach them. But for a lot of people, Clay — I’ve been thinking more about this — there’s a stubbornness with we don’t want to admit that the evil, right-wing insurrectionists —

CLAY: Were right.

BUCK: — et cetera, like you and me were right.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: They cannot psychologically cope, not that they had to do all this, that we were right the whole time.

CLAY: I think there’s some truth to that.

Recent Stories