×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Sen. Dan Sullivan on Truckers, SCOTUS, Military Vax Mandate

9 Feb 2022

BUCK: Senator Dan Sullivan of Alaska, here he was recently with some members of a convoy, I believe, up in Alaska. Play it.

BUCK: Senator Sullivan was up there at a trucker protest in Alaska, and he is with us now. Senator Dan Sullivan, good to have you on, sir.

SEN. SULLIVAN: Hey! Clay, Buck, good to be on the show. Thanks.

BUCK: Great to have you. So what’s going on? A lot of us stateside and, you know, in the lower 48 in particular, but certainly up in Alaska I know people are talking about this too. I wondered, is there gonna be a trucker protest, a trucker convoy similar to what’s happened in Canada? What’s going on up in your state in Alaska? Tell us about it.

SEN. SULLIVAN: Well, look, people are very motivated to support not just the truckers but this whole issue of this illegal, unconstitutional vaccine mandate. I think, you know, the rally that I was at back home over the weekend, this is bringing out people who don’t always protest. This is bringing about average Alaskans, average Americans ’cause people are tired of this.

And I will tell you, the one thing that I tried to emphasize in my remarks is a lot of people right now have amnesia. Think about it, you guys. The truckers and other front-line workers during the pandemic two years ago when things were just hitting our country, they were telling everybody, “Hey, you gotta telework.” Well, guess what?

There’s a lot of people in America who couldn’t telework: The people who are keeping the shelves in our stores full, the people who are producing oil and gas, the front-line police and first responders, our military. So I was saying, “Hey, it’s not just the truckers who we want to support, but we gotta remember these are the people who kept us going during the pandemic,” and now they’re being forgotten or being told they’re gonna be fired if they don’t get a vaccine. It’s outrageous.

CLAY: What are you hearing, Senator Sullivan…? I appreciate you coming on with us. What are you hearing from your constituents about supply chain issues all over Alaska, I would imagine, maybe even more pronounced than in many other parts of the country given how difficult it can be to ship things and move things around? And what are you hearing about this massive, I feel like, outpouring against covid restrictions in general? I know Alaska has got a great affinity for freedom. What are your constituents telling you in the state about both those issues?

SEN. SULLIVAN: Well, they’re interrelated, and it’s a great question because, as you mentioned, we in Alaska are very vulnerable to supply chains. A lot of what the Canadians say is their policies directly impact us. I was talking to a trucker at that rally who said for months and months he was driving through Canada to deliver supplies to Alaskans. He had actually gotten a vaccination, but now he said, “I’m being required to get a booster, and I can’t supply the people of Alaska.”

Literally one of the guys at the rally who I was talking to. So to me, they are very interconnected. But again, I will say that my constituents are just tired of this federal overreach. Here’s something that I think was really important, and it hasn’t been discussed well. When we put together the CARES Act — and look, nobody knew what was really gonna happen.

That was the first big relief bill. The overriding principle that we put in that bill — Democrats and the Republicans, Trump administration, all of us working together — was if you’re a business or an airline or something that’s getting federal aid, you actually have to keep your workers. You have to keep them. The whole point of the CARES Act was keeping people together, keeping people working.

Joe Biden comes in, you guys, and takes a sledgehammer to that principle and flips it on its head and says to employers, “If people don’t get vaccinated, you gotta go fire the very people who are keeping us safe when there was no vaccine.” Think about the illogical nature of that. So I think the average Alaskan is viewing these mandates as something that we’re just not tired of but that the government, the federal government has no right to enact.

And the one thing I said at the rally that I think a lot of people wanted to hear was that we’re actually winning. We are winning. When these unconstitutional and illegal vaccination mandates have been challenged, we won in almost every court, including the U.S. Supreme Court. And you guys may have seen it, we put forward — I was the lead cosponsor of — a Congressional Review Act resolution.

That’s a resolution that has the force of law in the Senate. It passed with bipartisan numbers of senators — (chuckles) Democrats voted for it, too — to overturn Biden’s illegal mandate. So we’re winning, and I think the people are behind us, and I think there’s just a weariness here, but also a sense that the government has gotten way out of its lane in terms of its constitutional and legal authorities.

CLAY: It’s interesting you mentioned that, Senator Sullivan. Like me, you met your wife in law school, I believe. You were at Georgetown, and I believe I’ve got all that correct. I’m curious what you think about the uproar surrounding Ilya Shapiro, who is a Georgetown professor. As an alum — and certainly you’re gonna be enmeshed in the decision of who the next Supreme Court justice is. What did you think of that fracas, that controversy, and how does it play into the larger context in which a Supreme Court justice will soon be considered on Capitol Hill? You’re an alum of Georgetown. I’m curious what you think.

SEN. SULLIVAN: Well, look, what I’ve been saying on the Supreme Court nominee is that I’m gonna do what I think every Senator should do, is meet with the nominee, go over his or her record, and — importantly — treat him or her and the office with the respect and dignity that it requires. Okay? This is a very, very important position no matter who’s nominated. But what I’m not gonna do is take part in any kind of fiasco circus that you saw with Brett Kavanaugh, right?

That was a low point, in my view, of how this is supposed to be done, and I don’t anticipate on the Republican side any kind of those antics. We’re gonna be focused on the record and on the judicial philosophy. What I do with every single Supreme Court nominee that I have vetted and met with… I’m not on the Judiciary Committee. But I take it very serious, because as you guys probably know, there are many federal court decisions that only relate to Alaska, federal laws that only relate to Alaska.

And what I do with all the justices or judges who want to be justices and come before me, is I try to educate them on those, whether I’m gonna vote for them are not. “Hey, are you aware of this? Are you aware of that?” I also grill them on the Second Amendment. Very, very, very important to my constituents. A lot of judges aren’t fully up to speed on the Heller decision.

That’s the Scalia decision that said for the first time in American history that the Second Amendment is an individual right that is not related to your service in a militia. Gigantic issue for the great state of Alaska and my constituents. So I do it with respect, but also grill ’em on things that matter to the people I represent, and then get to judicial philosophy: What is your view of your role on the court?

BUCK: Senator Sullivan we’ve only got about —

SEN. SULLIVAN: We won’t treat them the way Kavanaugh was treated.

BUCK: Yeah, was horrible.

SEN. SULLIVAN: That was outrageous, and we can’t go there again. We shouldn’t go there again.

BUCK: We’re speaking to Senator Dan Sullivan of Alaska. Sir, just before you go, I wanted to know. You were an infantry officer and a colonel in the United States Marine Corps. Thank you for your service. There have been members of the military who have been fired from their jobs, who have been kicked out for the vaccine mandate issue in recent days. What do you think could be done, should be done at the government level?

I mean, assuming let’s say maybe even Republicans take control of the House and the Senate in this midterm, how do we make amends for that? Because I think that’s a stain on the honor of this country that we would kick out men and women for not getting a shot that, as we all saw, didn’t stop the spread in the first place. What should be done?

SEN. SULLIVAN: Well, look. I’m actually still serving. I’m a colonel in the Reserves. I just spent 10 days out in the INDOPACOM theater as part of an exercise operation — or exercise Keen Edge, a bilateral exercise — with the Japanese military. So I’m still very involved and on the Armed Services Committee. Look, I think the one thing that has to happen is the exemption process that’s going on through military has to be taken seriously.

You know, in the military, you go through, and you get all kinds of vaccines when you’re first in, when you’re going through the boot camp or officer candidate school. I do think it’s a little different from the average citizen given that history. But what I have been concerned about right now is up until now you’re reading about services that haven’t provided any exemptions for anything. And I think that that, even for the military, is under the law, and it’s something that we need to look hard at with regard to keeping our force ready, lethal, strong, but also making sure they’re abiding by the rules that relate to these kind of vaccines.

CLAY: Senator Sullivan, appreciate you joining us. Keep us updated on the Alaskan truckers joining alongside of the Canadian truckers and we look forward to talking to you again soon.

SEN. SULLIVAN: Great. Clay, Buck, thanks very much, and I look forward to getting back on the show.

BUCK: Thank you.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

The Science Hasn’t Changed! You Were WRONG, Libs!

9 Feb 2022

BUCK: New York State rolling back the indoor mask mandate but not the school mask mandate, and the CDC — the breaking news here is — they’re still recommending masking in high-transmission areas. Why is this such a fight at this point? Cases are down. We ask that rhetorically, of course. We’ll tell you why. We’re gonna get into why. But cases are down almost 50% in the last couple of weeks.

There’s been an enormous change in the covid positivity rate, right, and the covid rate of spread, of hospitalization, everything. It’s obviously just the end of the season, the end of the season, and they’re acting like this is because we are in a situation where we should be thanking the Fauciites and the people around us for what they have done here, for the situation of the lockdowns, the mask mandates, vaccine passports, all of it.

If anything else, you have to remember, they’re going to try to tell you that they did everything right and that everything that they’re doing is right and will continue to be. And, Clay, what I want to say is I refuse to allow this. I refuse to let them act like the science changed — we found out new stuff, we did everything that we were supposed to do — that the promises they made about stopping the spread and transmission of the virus, that masks work. This is a hill I will gladly die on — unmasked. It doesn’t work, it didn’t work, and they’re crazy.

CLAY: Well, this is significant, right? We need consequences for public policy failures. We need to know that there are issues when you’re totally wrong, whether it’s defund the police, which basically no one in America now is even arguing they were ever in favor of, Buck, like you can’t even find a Democrat now who says defund the police is a good idea. That’s after everyone was arguing for basically six months defund the police was the way to go.

BUCK: I think there’s one, I think on Fox News this morning. Who was it? Just to be fair, Clay, I think there’s Cori Bush.

CLAY: She’s still arguing in favor of it?

BUCK: Cori Bush, as of this morning, is refusing — this is on FoxNews.com — to back away from defund the police. This is their main story, which is what I was thinking about. So, there’s one Clay. There’s one.

CLAY: There is at least one Democrat who is still — and you know what? I actually have more respect for her. I didn’t have much respect for Cori Bush in the first place because she was, if I remember correctly, one of the women who was sleeping on the steps of the Capitol to get an unconstitutional eviction moratorium. But she also spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on her own private security while arguing that police needed to be defunded.

BUCK: ‘Cause she’s important, Clay.

CLAY: Yes. But at least she’s sticking to her guns, so to speak, on this one. But there need to be… For everybody out there, Dr. Leana Wen — Buck, we talked about this yesterday — when I saw her CNN hit, my jaw dropped. It’s rare that I see an opinion… I mean, this is a woman who a few weeks ago was saying (summarized), “Every kid needs to be mandatory vaccinated. You need to have domestic travel restrictions for the unvaccinated.

“You need to have medical-grade masks on every kid in school,” and suddenly she said, “All of that can go away; this should be a parental decision,” and it’s as if what she said before never existed. And this is where I think we need to keep hammering this for everybody out there. No. You can’t suddenly just pivot and change everything that you’ve been arguing for two years. And the crazy thing is, did you see what Leana Wen tweeted? I mean, this is wild, Buck.

This is her Washington Post opinion piece. I’m saying, “Wait a minute. We have been the nuanced group, Buck!” You and I have been arguing “look at the data” for years! “Address elderly people!” We say this on the show how many times, we told our own parents, “Get the covid shot, get the booster, you’re over 75 years old.”

We’re telling our audience out there, “Hey, if you’re morbidly obese like Stacey Abrams, you probably should get the covid shot,” right? If you are in ill health, you probably should get it. But my 7-year-old doesn’t need to be treated the same as my 75-plus-year-old parents. This is a different world. That’s what we’ve been arguing — and all of a sudden, these scientists can’t say, “Oh, we’re the nuanced group.” No, no, no. You were wrong, we were right, and there need to be consequences politically for your wrongness.

BUCK: And the one place where they’re really digging in still is one of the areas where they have the least data to support them, but where clearly there’s an emotional component on this, and that’s on the situation of kids. Why are we sitting here talking about…? I don’t even have kids. Clay’s got school-age children so this affects him more directly than it does me.

Why are we sitting here trying to fight that fight? Because they’re claiming that they’re going to continue with the masking of children in New York at least, for weeks, if not months, until they can get the higher level of vaccination. Now they’re acting like, “We gotta get all the kids vaccinated,” and that’s the issue. They are neurotics, and they are hysterical.

This is the problem we are facing now, and they’re sacrificing children because they’re not in a position to say, “Hey, adults, stop being crazy,” and they have really trained themselves. Psychologically, emotionally, the Democrat Party has viewed this entire covid-restriction regime as a function of whether or not they’re good people.

You still have James Carville, for example. Remember how he said this is all about creating…? We talked about this yesterday. Everybody I think knows what I’m about to say, about how when everything started to fail, Clay, to fill that emotional hole that people had from all the fear and everything else, they didn’t turn on the government. They turned on the unvaccinated. Here’s James Carville saying he wants to punch ’em in the face.

CLAY: He wants to punch me right in the face. I’m unvaccinated — by the way, I think I like my chances with James Carville —

BUCK: Give it a shot, Jimmy.

CLAY: I’ve got him by 30 years and probably 30 pounds, so it’s not exactly a fair fight, kind of like when you’re a girl and you’re having to swim against boys, which is what’s going on in the Ivy League. That’s why we have weight classes for boxing. But I think I would take James Carville, and I actually at times think James Carville’s really entertaining.

To me, this is a sign that he doesn’t know what the data is, right? Because if he… There are a lot of people out there of the James Carville ilk who are Democrats that convince themselves that they did everything right and the only reason covid still exists is because people are unvaccinated. That’s not remotely true. That’s not what the data shows.

BUCK: I think the primary reason… There are a lot of reasons. There are still people, I mean, Clay, walking around New York City. There are double maskers outside right now.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: Still, walking into the studio today, I see double maskers outside. I also saw an NYPD detective who came over, flashed his badge, said, “I love what you and Clay are doing.” So high five to that guy.

CLAY: I appreciate him. Maybe he can help me sneak into a restaurant whenever I’m back in New York City.

BUCK: I think NYPD would have us covered here.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: But anyway, the reality is that the primary motivate for the apparatus is to maintain control of the dissent and to always have in the background… You know, they’re gonna loosen the leash, Clay, but they’re not gonna take the leash off of us. That’s one aspect of it. And then for the people, the mass those of who have suffered from mass formation psychosis…

I love that term because it sets them off into fits of rage. Their biggest thing is, “We can’t have been wrong this whole time. Those stupid Trump voters can’t have been right.” There’s a huge ego component of this where they just… You keep saying “the data.” Clay, there are people now who will look at the most obvious and clear data. They’ll look at, what is it, Williamson County versus Davidson County —

CLAY: Davidson County, yep.

BUCK: — schools side by side and they’ll say, “I don’t care. The numbers don’t matter to them anymore. Those anti-maskers, Trumpers, anti-vax mandate people? They’re the bad people, Clay. They should get punched in the face. They can’t be right.” We’re here to tell all those, folks, “No you were right, and the other side — the libs, the Fauciites — were Wrong. Big W Wrong.”

CLAY: And here’s the other thing I think is worth mentioning. Even as Democratic governors in places like Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, and even in New York, Buck, with Kathy Hochul start to walk back their restrictions, it’s important to recognize that governors can walk back their restrictions but the cities and the local school districts where many kids are attending school still are not walking back simultaneously, right?

So I think this is a little bit of a bait-and-switch, because we know that the media, many people who cover certainly left-wing politics are not very smart and they’re also biased. But, Buck, I don’t want us to overlook, just because a governor walks back a restriction statewide doesn’t mean that the vast majority of kids in a state still could not be mandated to continue to have to wear masks.

I think some of our people out there listening may not understand that, and I think it’s going to create even more tension and even more conflict at a school board because this is like what’s going on in Virginia. The woman that we had on yesterday, she said, “Wait. I was told if the governor didn’t have this restriction, that mask mandates would disappear.” Merianne Jensen who came on with us yesterday. But the reality is these local school boards and these dictatorial mayors can still have power over whether or not your kids are required to wear masks.

BUCK: The lesson of what we’re seeing right now for me and for anyone who’s paying attention to this, Clay, is that the science didn’t change; the politics changed. Everyone’s saying that now, and it’s accurate. But that’s not just about what’s going on now. That has been the case the whole time. They have been making policy and judgment calls under the rubric of “the science” when it was really “the politics.”

That’s been true the entirety of the pandemic, really from the beginning. And I would even argue going back into the Trump administration there were a lot of politics involved in what lockdowns, when. Remember Cuomo and Fauci early on? They made this political, right? Trump wasn’t listening to the science enough. I think he listened to, quote, “the science” as in Fauci too much. This has been the case the whole time, and everyone who looks back, I think, they realize and they see that.

Recent Stories

Heather Mac Donald: Enforce the Law, Regardless of Race

9 Feb 2022

BUCK: Heather Mac Donald is with us now. She’s a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, contributing editor at City Journal, and the author of the excellent book — I’ve got a copy of it at home — The War on Cops. Her last piece in the City Journal: The Guardians in Retreat. Heather, thank you so much.

MAC DONALD: Well, thank you so much for having me on, Buck and Clay. It’s an honor.

BUCK: The Guardians in Retreat. Tell us about this. What’s going on?

MAC DONALD: Oh, it’s another example of white culling that is happening across our major institutions. The Art Institute of Chicago, which is one of the great museums in the world, decided to terminate its docent program not because the docents were doing a poor job or they weren’t communicating effectively with students, but because they were overwhelmingly white. And that in today’s world in institution after institution is a sin that you simply cannot overcome.

And so they’ve decided to give up on highly trained free labor that has introduced generations of Chicago children to the greatest masterpieces of world civilization, replace them with six paid art educators, which will be chosen not on the basis of knowledge but on the basis of the utter irrelevancy of race. If you’re a white — or if you’re especially a white male — and you are not trans or gay, you are finding doors closing to you across the culture.

CLAY: Heather, I appreciate you coming on and the work that you have done on police and the data and the danger relative to the way the media covers it is truly extraordinary. And so, 1995 was the last time this many police officers were killed, as we just saw in 2021. Why are, in your opinion, based on the data, police under attack like they have not been in basically a quarter century in this country? What is the data telling us?

MAC DONALD: Well, the data is telling us that in the first half of 2021 ambush assaults on officers were up 91%. As you say, 2021 overall was the highest since ’95. What’s going on here, I believe, is the effects of ruthless, relentless demonization of the police on the part of the elite Democratic establishment, and that includes President Joe Biden.

Joe Biden had the utter shamelessness in October during Police Week to memorialize slain officers in D.C. to bring up his constant theme that blacks in America were somehow under assault from police officers and that our criminal justice system was not meting out fair justice. That is a complete lie. None of data shows it. Even left-wing criminologists if they’re forced with a gun to the head to be honest, they will acknowledge that what drives the criminal justice system is crime, not race.

But Biden, even as recently as October, has been sending that message, and criminals get the message. You also have things like progressive prosecutors, whether it’s George Gascon in Los Angeles or the recently elected Alvin Bragg in New York City declaring, publicly announcing that they are not going to prosecute the crime of resisting arrest.

I can think of nothing more corrosive to respect for the rule of law than sending out a message that our prosecutorial establishment does not regard the disrespect for officers, the refusal to go along with lawful orders as something that should be absolutely punished. When you allow, as we saw with the 3rd Precinct in Minneapolis during the first outburst of the George Floyd race riots in late May of 2020…

That police precinct was torched. It was burned to the ground. It was deliberately abandoned on the part of the city’s leaders because they did not want to have bad video showing them engaged in strong combat with the Black Lives Matter rioters. When you allow the symbols and the reality of law enforcement to be so destroyed, you are destroying everybody else’s safety. We do not have to accept this.

This crime wave that is taking down the young, elderly, the law-abiding. We do not have to accept it. It is not normal. We have to start enforcing the law again without regard to the consequences of disparate impact, which is why everybody’s backing off of law enforcement because they don’t want you to have a disparate impact on minorities. When you back off on law enforcement to avoid a disparate impact on minority criminals, the first people who suffer are the law-abiding minority victims.

BUCK: Speaking to Heather Mac Donald, author of the book, the best-selling book, The War on Cops. Heather, is the pivot happening now? Because one of the big things we’re discussing now on the show is not just the move away from masks and various mandates because there’s an election looming, and more and more people are realizing how stupid and pointless a lot of this stuff was. Is that happening in a different way or on different subject when it comes to the soft-on-crime policies?

You mentioned the handing out of free crack pipes. That’s going on. But you do have Bragg, the DA in New York, coming under a lot of heat for his just seemingly insane statement on who he will and won’t prosecute. Cops are getting refunded, if you will, in places like Austin and other jurisdictions, other cities where they were defunded in the past. Is the pivot happening, or there are places that are still holding out against it?

MAC DONALD: Oh, there’s many places still holding out, and here’s what to look for. If we go back to enforcing the law, it will have a disparate impact because black crime rates are astronomically higher. They’re about 13-times higher, homicide rate for blacks than for whites. So when you enforce the law against shootings, blacks in New York City commit about 75% of all shootings though they’re 23% of the population.

A black New Yorker is 50 times more likely to commit a shooting than a white New Yorker. If we go back to enforcing the law, we will have a disparate impact on criminals, and the majority those criminals are black. If Eric Adams, the mayor of New York, backs down under the ACLU pressure — which will happen, and he’s already said that he wants to collect racial data on judges to see if they are setting higher bail or holding violent offenders rather than letting them loose on the streets at a higher rate for blacks — that’s gonna set off alarm bells.

I’m yet to be persuaded that the long-standing race narrative in the United States that every aspect in American society that is racially disproportionate as a result of racism has been dislodged. It is going to take people standing up and saying, “There are other explanations to ongoing racial disparities than racism.” Yes, this is a country that had a terrible history, and that history lasted very recently.

In the sixties and seventies, even in the North, blacks were still being treated with contempt. But we are a changed country. Right now, the reality is black privilege, not white privilege. There’s not a single institution that is not bending over backwards to hire and promote as many blacks as possible. The criminal justice system has nothing to apologize for.

And we have to combat the leftist narrative that says, “Here’s a racial disparity. You know, there’s not 13% blacks in Google; that’s because of racism and discrimination against black engineers.” No. It’s because of an academic skills gap, culture gap, whatever. So I’m gonna hope that we’ve turned the corner on this, but I tell you, it’s a hard haul because the academy and the Democratic establishment still remains wedded to the phony racism narrative.

CLAY: Heather, quickly here, you had a stat that I was trying to reference earlier this week. The percentage chance that a police officer is shot by a black person versus the chances that they shoot a black person, it was something like 18,000 more? What is that stat? Do you remember in your book specifically?

MAC DONALD: Last year, there were four unarmed blacks, allegedly. I say allegedly unarmed because that’s the Washington Post databases and they classify people that are trying to grab an officer’s gun as unarmed. There are four unarmed blacks shot by the police out of a population of between 44, 47 million. If you look at the number of police officers who were killed last year, which is 73, and you do a per capita comparison, and you take into account the historical rate at which blacks have shot police officers fatally, which is about 42% of all cop killers are black…

I’m sorry. This is a lot of numbers to throw out. The bottom line is a police officer is 400 times as likely to be killed by a black criminal as an unarmed black person is to be killed by a police officer. So the narrative, again, as we know — as you guys keep pressing home, Buck and Clay — is completely false. And, you know, the other thing that one needs to said, the libertarian left… Libertarians and the left always say, “Oh, it’s so safe to be a police officer.

“Nothing to worry about. These guys have it really easy.” Well, again, let’s look at the rate of deaths. Police officers were a thousand times as likely to be killed last year as blacks were by police officers. So if it’s safe to be a police officer, and you’re a thousand times more likely to be killed than an unarmed black is. Let’s, for heavens’ sakes, acknowledge — contrary to what Biden tells black parents all the time — that as far as the police go, it is very, very safe to be black.

Who should we be worried about? These insane teen thugs who are going around spraying bullets across city streets, taking down 1-year-olds, 3-year-olds, 4-year-olds. Last year in Chicago alone there was a 1-month-old girl shot in the head, a 4-year-old boy shot twice in the head, a 6-year-old girl shot in the head, 7-year-old girl shot in the head, 9-year-old girl shot in the head. They’re not shot by the cops. They’re shot by thugs, and those thugs should be off the streets and in prison. No matter their race. No matter their age.

CLAY: Heather Mac Donald, thank you so much for this time. Thank you for the work that you have done contextualizing the danger to police out on our streets. Thank you.

MAC DONALD: Thank you, Buck and Clay. Such an honor.

Recent Stories

This California vs. Arizona Chart Tells You All You Need to Know About Masks

9 Feb 2022

CLAY: Buck, I was kind of curious — ’cause I’m out in L.A. — how aggressively they would be enforcing the vaccine mandates out here, and I’ve only been asked one time to go anywhere about whether or not I had a vaccine proof card or whatever you want to call it. I feel like this is crumbling. I was just talking with you off air. Our friend Ian Miller, who wrote a book about the failure of the masking…

BUCK: Unmasked.

CLAY: Yeah, Unmasked. He did a great job. We had him on the show recently. I was just looking during the commercial break, Arizona and California have had the exact same trajectory of covid even though California mandated masks basically everywhere on December 15th and Arizona did not. There are just so many of these, and I think it becomes readily apparent when you see it from a graphical perspective, Buck, how insane it is for anyone to still be arguing for these restrictions when you just overlay them and look at them on a side by-side-basis.

There’s no legitimacy to support it at all. Arizona is obviously a neighboring state with California. One state does one thing. We’ve seen it in Orange County versus L.A. County. We’ve seen it even in the Northeast for New York City as opposed to other surrounding communities that haven’t had vaccine mandates and passports — and certainly in my hometown of Nashville, Davidson County compared to Williamson County school.

And you were making a good point, and maybe we need to request that he do this. The next time Dr. Fauci testifies on Capitol Hill I would love for someone to print up big graphical examples of these results and just point to them in the hearing and say, “Dr. Fauci, how do you explain — if your restrictive measures actually work — the fact that these graphs are identical whether masks are mandated or not?

“Whether kids are mandated to wear masks or not?” A layman, nonscientist looking at these identical graphs would say that masks have zero impact whatsoever. I would just love for him to get grilled on how to justify any restrictions over the last couple years, especially because he would pull his mask down to answer that question.

BUCK: It would go something like this (impression), “He would start talking and say, ‘First of all, science? That’s me. Second of all, you’ll address me as Science. Third of all, mitigation measures in different places, in different locations at times…'” He’s mastered the art of just bureaucratese —

CLAY: Gibberish.

BUCK: — with not actually ever really saying anything. “We look at the data, and we make determinations based on science.” He never answers, “Okay. Well, how the heck does Arizona and California have the same curve, you imbecile, if one did the thing you said really works well and the other didn’t?” It’s just the same thing! It’s like you have a little… Remember those dolls they had back where you’d pull the string? What was it?

CLAY: Say three or four things?

BUCK: Yeah, they said three or four things. That’s Fauci: “Diminution! Mitigation! Droplets! Masks! Vaccines.” It’s the same crap from this guy every day.

Recent Stories

“Harm Reduction”: Psaki Defends Biden’s Free Crack Pipe Program

9 Feb 2022

BUCK: Want to address opioid overdoses in this country? One of the biggest ways to do harm reduction would be securing our southern border to the greatest extent possible.

Welcome back to Clay and Buck. The White House now drilling down on the issue of opioid overdoses. Two-out-of-three overdose deaths last year were from opioids; over 100,000 Americans died. Now there’s been a commission, U.S. Commission on Combating Synthetic Opioid Trafficking. They just published a report yesterday that you had a million people, a million Americans died from opioid overdose from 1999 to present.

And the numbers keep going up year over year in recent years, such that we actually have reductions in average American life expectancy for people in the midrange of life, let’s say 25 to 50 or so — and below 20, 18 to 50 — because of the massive increases in the amount of people who are dying from this. Now, she’s correct on some points. An absolutely essential cause, Clay, to stop the scourge of opioid overdoses in this country is a national emergency.

This is a true emergency. This isn’t climate change, “Oh, in 50 years or a hundred years we think…” This is right now. This is people listening to this who have lost loved ones — have lost family members, friends, colleagues, coaches, teammates, you name it — to drug overdoses. Two out of three of these overdoses are opioids, and here’s the part of it that they are not going to focus on.

This is coming across our border from Mexican drug cartels. The Mexican drug cartels use the human trafficking flow to bog down the Border Patrol members so that there are processing: Bringing sandwiches and water and doing covid testing — or not doing covid testing as the case may be. They’re bringing “people resources,” and that means that the border is then wide open and the cartels…

I’ve seen this in real time. They’ll just run a pickup truck or they’ll run people on foot where they know there’s not gonna be any coverage because there’s such a huge human trafficking flow. And then there’s also the China component of this which I’ll get into in a moment. But, Clay, if they’re going to be serious about dealing with the drug overdoses scourge in this country, they have to look at the porous border and make changes, and they won’t. So they’re identifying a problem but once again the Democrats aren’t serious about the solution. Giving out crack pipes is not gonna do it.

CLAY: Well, it’s unfortunate, there’s no doubt, and also I think this is directly connected not only with the border but with the shutdown and lockdown policy. ‘Cause there’s no surprise that the overall number of opioid deaths skyrocketed when suddenly you weren’t allowing people to be surrounded by their support structures, whether it’s going to addict meetings, whether it’s going to church, whether it’s being able to interact with their friends and family — and this is an important detail.

As we have set a high… I mean, that’s a crazy, unbelievable, awful number, Buck: A million people since 1999. We also have to think about years of life that are lost, and this is something that I’ve continued to hammer throughout the course of all of this covid madness. The average person who is dying of covid — or with covid, more accurately — is typically older than the average age of death in the United States.

That is, it’s awful, but the people who are dying with covid are approaching the age at which most people die of all causes. When somebody in their twenties or thirties or forties dies, Buck, they are losing 40 years or 50 years or sometimes 60 years of life, and this is why — and everybody out there understands it. It’s why when you go to a funeral for someone who is younger, that has died, it is such an awful feeling compared to when you go to a funeral for someone who’s 85 or 90 and it’s a celebration of their life.

What we are doing is destroying young people’s lives by not protecting our border, by not fighting against all of these — all these drugs that are coming in and then by not allowing people to live their normal life, we have stacked up tens of thousands of additional deaths that would otherwise not have occurred if we had never done lockdowns.

Recent Stories

Boris Johnson Declares the End of Covid Rules in the U.K.

9 Feb 2022

CLAY: Maybe Joe Biden is going to go for a grand pronouncement at his State of the Union address, which is suspiciously late, as we get close to the spring. Usually, the State of the Union is in January, and now it is pushed all the way back to March, and so maybe Joe Biden is going to make some grand pronouncement about covid at that point in time.

But listen to what Boris Johnson has done now in England. Obviously, Boris Johnson, under fire for a variety of parties, for not necessarily following — his government following — the restrictions that he put in place for other people. But listen to what is happening right now in England. And this is also, by the way, happening in Ireland, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and many other European countries where they’re effectively saying, “Hey, covid is over here. No more restrictions at all.” That’s what England is doing. Listen.

BUCK: Ah.

CLAY: It’s kind of a big deal.

BUCK: Kind of a big deal, Clay. It’s interesting how these other countries have also been much more willing to release children from the grips of their mask and otherwise covid lockdown-induced hysteria. And this needs to be happening all over the place. Look, it’s all coming here, too, because the virus is receding very rapidly right now. It’s down.

The 14-day change according to the New York Times website — which is just CDC data reflected through the Times’ website — is down 63% in two weeks, okay? The virus is cratering. What’s fascinating is, as you see an analysis of it, it will be the same mask/no mask. Different areas of the country that are near each other, whether these policies are in place or not, it’s just coming down everywhere because we’re past the respiratory virus season peak just like last year.

Isn’t it amazing, Clay, just like last year the middle of January, late January, worst covid case numbers, this year same thing despite the vaccinations. And the variance we’re seeing the deaths right now, the 14-day change on that is deaths are actually up 9%. Now, that’s ’cause deaths are a lagging indicator.

Also, people often spend a week, 10 days in the hospital fighting covid and then sometimes obviously tragically unsuccessfully. But 2500 deaths a day is what they’re counting right now. That’s a lot of people, considering what we’ve been told about the incredible efficacy of the vaccine against hospitalization and death. I know they had been saying it was 99% unvaccinated people. You’re going to see that number, folks, drop and drop and drop.

CLAY: In fact, it’s kind of vanished, that argument. Remember we started off the winter with Joe Biden putting out the official statement that it was going to be a winter of death for the unvaccinated. You’ve ready even started to see the White House back away from the argument that this is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” because the data — at least if you look at Israel which is far more reliable than the data that we have here — reflects, as Alex Berenson told us last week, that the covid shot, the covid vaccine, whatever you want to call it…

Which is making Pfizer, by the way, $50 billion. Kind of a monster deal, that we have mandated a for-profit corporation’s product be used by almost everyone in the United States on some level and that they’re gonna end up making $50 billion, Buck. And, oh, by the way, they also have protection against any lawsuits. So that’s a pretty good business you are in if you are in the drug business, to be able to get hooked up like that.

And so it is going to be pretty wild to see how this continues to shake out. But again, England, Ireland, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, among other countries effectively saying, “Covid is over; we are ending all restrictions,” and I gotta say, I feel like Biden may try to make a grand pronouncement at the State of the Union as we get close to the spring. And, Buck, we predicted on this show right around January 14th or January 15th, there was gonna be the peak in cases.

We nailed that, and then we said, “Hey, you know, this trails by three or four weeks the overall death rate before it starts to come down.” Now, remember, a lot of these people who are dying are dying “with” covid, not dying “of” covid. So it got so common, Omicron did, that a lot of people are just testing positive. And I think Berenson’s point is a good one, that many of the unvaccinated people who are dying are so ill that they’re not actually being vaccinated at all because they are not healthy enough, which is pretty significant.

Recent Stories

Canadian Trucker to Journo: Go Fauci Yourself!

9 Feb 2022

CLAY: The people that are having the most impact, I would say, in the world right now in terms of fighting absurd covid restrictions are everyone who is supporting and a part of Canadian trucker protest all throughout Canada right now. This is a pretty fantastic interview that happened. A Canadian trucker was asked about a report that they are concerned about the safety of children in the Canadian convoy.

There have been reports, by the way, that this is very much of a family-based protest, that there are lots of kids involved, despite the fact that Justin Trudeau has tried to say that this is an awful group of people and tried to turn them into — go figure — white supremacists and people who are misogynistic and racist and all these different things. Listen to this interview with a Canadian trucker and the CBC.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: I love the slimy little propagandist squirming in the face of the Canadian trucker here. This guy’s amazing. I love this guy.

CLAY: It sounds like a WWE interview, right?

BUCK: Yeah, absolutely. It sounds like this guy understands exactly what was happening here, Clay, which was reporters come up to them, ‘Hey, Children’s Aid Society says maybe…” First of all, what? Second of all, “Maybe your kid shouldn’t be here, they’re in danger, maybe the state should take your children away”? Notice how the journalist isn’t framing this as, “What an outrage. Trudeau is such a fascist and such an evil coward that maybe his government would even consider taking your children away from you!”

There’s been no violence. This isn’t Nazis. All this stuff… It’s all bullcrap but the journos, ’cause they’re on the payroll — literally on the payroll — of the Canadian state, just so everyone understands. That’s not an exaggeration. They are state media. They receive funding directly from the Canadian government. They’re like, “Hey, nice kids you got there. Be a shame if someone took them away from you.” And this trucker is like, “Go Fauci yourself!”

Recent Stories

Crime’s So Bad, They’re Locking Up Rev. Al’s Toothpaste

9 Feb 2022

SHARPTON: Well, I think he’s got a challenge there, because there’s a debate in the criminal justice system and there are those that are concerned — including me — about overloading the system in the jails with petty crime. But, at the same time, you cannot have a culture where people are just — at random, just — robbing and stealing and it’s out of control and it’s put on the front page of newspapers, which only encourages others to do it. Uh, in fairness to Eric, he’s only been mayor five weeks, but in —

WOMAN: Yeah!

SHARPTON: But even as I’m fair to him: Eric, they’re locking up my toothpaste!

WOMAN: (laughing)

BUCK: They are locking up the Reverend Al’s toothpaste. Let me tell you, they’re locking up the Buckster’s toothpaste, too, Clay. My drugstore on my corner, you can’t get toothpaste, toothbrushes, chocolate, razors. Anything that is portable and resalable you have to get a clerk — and this is in Midtown Manhattan — to go open a locked plastic box with an alarm because they’re just…

And I’ve talked to them about it. They say, “People just come in here and just steal everything in sight,” and we’re not allowed to do anything about it and the cops don’t care. Reverend Al, Democrats realizing, this a bad look, folks, bad look for the party in charge whether it’s the city or the national level.

CLAY: You know things are bad when Al Sharpton is demanding more police presence and more security. I mean, to his credit! Thanks for pointing it out, but I just… I don’t know, Buck. You know better than anybody ’cause you worked in consult with the NYPD. How do you dial back the lawlessness, you know once it starts moving in the wrong direction?

Obviously back in the nineties, Bratton and Giuliani found a way to reverse what was the disaster. They took, you know, 2,000-plus murders a year in New York City and took it down to like 250 or whatever it was. I mean, 90% of all murders disappeared. How do you stop the train of lawlessness and start to pivot back in the other direction?

BUCK: The short answer — and this goes to what Heather Mac Donald said — you have to understand that enforcing the laws must be done regardless of whether there’s a disparate impact.

Recent Stories

Fauci Joins the Big Election Pivot, The View Lags Behind

9 Feb 2022

CLAY: Dr. Fauci has joined all the other people out there who are suddenly seeing the light and arguing against the continuation of restrictions. He told the Financial Times… By the way, the number of outlets that Fauci has time to do interviews with continues to astound me, right, like, because he can’t come on this show. He’s too busy to come on this show why but yet I see him doing interviews with every outlet.

BUCK: He’s like (impression), “Here I am at the Bob & Sue Basement Show in the middle of Topeka, Kansas,” and I’m wondering. I’m like, “Not our show, though!”

CLAY: He can’t come on the biggest radio show in America, but he’s got time for interviews with all these different outlets. So look, he did the Financial Times in an interview yesterday. He said that he “agreed that restrictions will end soon and we’ll be largely over by the end of this year.” That’s interesting, because we’ve been telling you that the big pivot was coming because of the midterm elections.

Here’s a question that I have for you, Buck — and we’re gonna get to the stupidity of The View here in a moment, because this is one of the obstacles to normalcy is the idiocy of many people that are still out there in the media. But, Buck, when you see Fauci making pivots like these along with Dr. Leana Wen and all the other — I’m using quotation marks here — “experts,” do you think that it’s possible…?

‘Cause here’s my new theory. Fauci resigns in the summer, claims victory over covid, before the Democrats lose the House and the Senate, so he doesn’t look like he’s tucking his legs between his tails over what happens in the midterm. He retires ’cause he’s 82 years old or whatever he is, and he, then, is arguably let out on a… This is my prediction where the pivot is headed.

He is then lionized as a hero by the CNNs, the MSNBCs, the New York Times, and the Washington Posts of the world, rides off into the sunset in the summer, and that is one of their new narrative pivots is, “Biden defeated covid, Fauci defeated covid, and now they are resigning, because Fauci is no longer needed to battle covid,” and that is the narrative that they carry into the midterms. “We beat covid! Finally, everybody listened. We got enough people vaccinated. The masking worked! Kids are…” I think that’s where they’re headed.

BUCK: Oh, they’re gonna try for sure. Think about it. What’s their other move? “Joe Biden is a moron. We lied to you. We were wrong about everything”? That’s the truth, but they’re not gonna say that, obviously.

CLAY: Well, they could stick on the restrictions, and I think they’re recognizing now that will never work.

BUCK: So if you’re not gonna stick to the restrictions you have to come up with a victory narrative. You have to declare victory and let everybody go out now without masks on outside. I will tell everyone this now. I will never be grateful. I will never let this go. I will never be okay with what they did. I’m an anti-mask zealot.

I’m also going to hound Fauci for the rest of his days in public life as much as I can, because what he and the CDC and Walensky and others… The CDC should be torn down to the studs and rebuilt from scratch. It did nothing but make things worse throughout the entire pandemic. It became a tool of politics for the Biden White House. “Oh, we’re not doing mandates. We’re just listening to the CDC.”

And the CDC would say, “Oh, we’re not the ones ordering this. We’re just giving advice.” We know how the game is played. We saw it the whole time. The problem they’re gonna have going for the narrative point you’re making, Clay, which is what really matters to the left to the apparatus? Power. How are they gonna try to keep it? Which is what you’re saying: They’re victorious; they shut down the virus. Problem is, we just went through a really bad covid season with all-time record caseloads for a lot of places with a lot… We’re still actually —

CLAY: — rising on the deaths because they are behind three or four weeks.

BUCK: That’s right. We’re still seeing the tabulation of hospitalization and deaths going on. A lot of people died from covid over this winter period, and what we’re going to see — mark my words — is that the vaccine without booster or Omicron was far less protective than they were telling us even deep into December and early January as people were getting sent to the hospital and some people were dying from covid.

So the numbers are gonna be the problem for them, because I think they really believed that the super-vaccinated areas like New York City were gonna be fine. They were gonna be fine, and they’d be able to point that all those stupid Trump voters in those places —

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: — where, you know, people don’t live in 400-square-foot apartments that they can’t afford like me in New York, and point and say, “Oh, they’re all so stupid!” That didn’t happen at all. New York, L.A., D.C. got rocked with covid this winter.

CLAY: Remember this summer when the narrative was, “Look at all these stupid red state residents who didn’t get vaccinated and now they are getting crushed!” Florida, Tennessee, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, all of us got destroyed ’cause we were stupid. We hadn’t listened to “the science.” And then what happened? All of the red states came through the covid wave, and then the covid wave spread, as we predicted that it would, to the Northeast.

Then we tossed in on top of Delta to Omicron, and all of a sudden, the AP… Do you remember this, Buck? The AP put out a style guide and said, “Hey, we have to stop referring to breakthroughs based on the geographic location.” As soon as it happened in the Northeast, you couldn’t then demonize red states for the failures there. So I think this pivot…

The challenge they’re gonna have with this pivot is, Buck, is they have so terrified the base of Democratic voters that 30% of people that are most in favor of restrictions, of kids being in masks, believe fundamental untruths — and they believe fundamental untruths because Democrats did whatever it took to win in 2020, including terrorizing people.

And we talked about even intelligent Democrats like Sonia Sotomayor, like Stephen Breyer… When you heard the arguments about the covid vaccine mandate in the Supreme Court, remember Sonia Sotomayor said there’s a hundred thousand kids or whatever it was on ventilators and they’re dying in massive numbers? And it was totally wrong. And then Breyer was saying, “Well, if we just got everybody vaccinated, there would no longer be any covid cases out there.” These are the smart ones. Well, The View are the dumb ones, right? And The View —

BUCK: They got some problems of their own. I think The View is great, though, Clay, for America because it exposes what Democrats who don’t read books or know anything think about what’s going on in the world around them. It’s almost like an experiment. If you actually are totally ignorant of reality, history, facts, and logic, these are your political positions; welcome to The View.

CLAY: If we had to pick, Buck, a media outlet that is the most opposite to our show on a daily basis, would it be The View?

BUCK: That has an audience?

CLAY: That has an audience, yeah. I think that might be.

BUCK: There are digital outfits for the left that are psychopathic Marxists who think there’s gonna… While they’re running adds ads for Amazon on their show, they’re like, “Yeah, man, overthrow the system!” They’re not even worth talking about. But, yes, The View is moronic, and can we get…? Everyone needs to hear this one — and remember, Sunny Hostin has a law degree. I believe she’s been a practicing lawyer.

CLAY: Oh, does she really?

BUCK: Yeah. I know, Clay. A lot of people have ’em. I gotta be honest with you. A lot of really dumb people on TV have law degrees, unfortunately. But here she… Don’t even get me started all the dumbasses who worked at the CIA, though. Here is Sunny Hostin who talking about the percentage of covid deaths among young people. Play it.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: 1%, Clay. If that was correct, intubated and dies, 1%, you would have had quite literally millions of children — or, sorry, hundreds of thousands; pardon me, my math is bad — hundreds of thousands of children who would have died from this virus ’cause millions were infected.

CLAY: Yes. So that’s so flagrantly wrong, again, what she said she was worried about — and she thought, probably, she was being accurate when she said, “I don’t want my kid to be one of the 1% who is intubated and dies.” There are a fraction of kids. I think it’s a 99.98% survival rate for kids that get covid. And, by the way —

BUCK: It’s higher than that. You’re right about the official numbers, but what level of covid cases making up children who we know don’t even show symptoms most of the time —

CLAY: Correct.

BUCK: — and we couldn’t even catch?

CLAY: And, by the way, what I was gonna say is, people aren’t dying of covid. By and large, these are kids that are very ill, and also get covid on top of many other comorbidities. But what she is selling is the idea that one in a hundred of people who get covid are going to get intubated and die, and it’s so flagrantly wrong.

To your point, Buck, there would be hundreds of thousands of kids that would have died of covid if her number was accurate. Now, that’s a massive miss, right? And it’s the kind of thing that she sells to her audience, and many of them believe it. This is the challenge with Democrats: How do they dial back sanity and bring forth reality when so many people believe fundamental untruths?

BUCK: I do advocate for being nice to people, right? We like to be nice on this show. Some people, need to get the rough stuff sometimes on air. But, you know, public figures. But we try to be nice people. You’re already seeing folks who are saying, Clay, “Oh, well, even if the mask mandates gone, don’t judge me if I’m going out with a mask on,” and I’m sorry. No. We’ve crossed the Rubicon on this because we know the people that refused to live in reality want to make you live with their delusion too.

So I’m actually not going to be okay with this. I’m not going to stop antagonizing people who think their children should be masked up in school because the moment the political winds shift, they’re gonna want normal people’s children to be masked up in school too, the moment there’s another season of Omicron or season of covid. So, no, I’m not letting any of this go and people could say that that’s harsh, but stop masking up. It’s stupid. It’s a superstition. We’re done with it.

CLAY: What do you think when you pass somebody who’s young and healthy theoretically on the street outdoors and they’re wearing a mask? Doesn’t happen to me that often. Obviously, it’s happened a lot where I’m in L.A. right now. I think completely normally in my head as I pass them, “You are a total loser imbecile.” That’s what I think in my head. I don’t say it to them, but that’s what I think when I see a young person — and when I see a young person who’s a kid that’s being forced to wear a mask, I just feel so bad for them that they have likely had a miserable two years, thanks to their parents being idiots.

BUCK: I think that in a lot of cases, they’re suffering from what would be a diagnosable anxiety disorder almost like agoraphobia or something like that but it’s a fear of being in public without masks.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: We should come up with some term for this. I feel very strongly, as I’ve said, that “to Fauci” something is to mess it up beyond all recognition.

CLAY: (laughing) I like that.

BUCK: Everyone should just be like, “Oh, man I, borrowed my dad’s car, and I wrapped it around a tree, and it’s totaled. I Fauci’d that thing up!”

CLAY: The new F-word.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: I like that.

BUCK: That’s how I feel about what a disaster that guy has been, and the data all proves it and shows it. I mean, you know, the amazing thing is, all the mandates that they pushed, Clay, for masks, for vaccines, for everything, was always premised under, “Shut up and listen to us. We’re going to shut down the virus and save so many lives.” They did all the tyrannical bullcrap they could get away with, and almost no benefit from it, right?

It would have been bad… I would be arguing against this even in any context, even if it worked nearly as well as they said it did. It basically didn’t work at all. I mean, when you look at Fauci saying that vaccine mandates still keep people safe indoors? There is zero data to support that the vaccine stopped the spread of Omicron. None!

CLAY: Well, and that Johns Hopkins study that was so well done that analyzed lockdowns and all of our behavior to see what actual impact it had, it got almost no attention from the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, the usual suspects. Not only are they anti-science, when science comes out to challenge their preferred narrative — even from an institution as widely respected in medicine as Johns Hopkins — they pretended didn’t exist.

BUCK: I had lunatics scream at me in my own home, the building where I live, because I walked past them — literally didn’t stop, walked past them — without a mask on. I had to deal with this. I’m not letting this go, man. I’m sorry. I’m a letting Fauci just go, “I’m gonna now count my millions in retirement and write books.” No. No. You apologize. You beg forgiveness. People can tell I am annoyed and agitated about these people.

Recent Stories

The Greatest Female Swimmer of All Time Is a Dude?

9 Feb 2022

CLAY: So, Buck, “the party of science,” as we have established, is not really the party of science when you actually look at data. News came down yesterday: A three-year men’s swimmer who decides to become a woman and is now prepared to become the greatest women swimmer of all time, University of Pennsylvania swimmer…

If you haven’t heard this story, it’s probably because most sports media haven’t covered it other than OutKick. This is crazy, Buck. The Ivy League has said this transgender swimmer is eligible to compete in the Ivy League championships, and now there may be… I’m not even making this up. The all-time greatest swimmer in the history of college athletics for women is going to be a man who decided to become a woman.

At what year in the past would you have to go to say that, and everyone not immediately erupt in laughter thinking it was satire? I mean, even as the recently as 2008-2010, do you remember the movie Juwanna Mann with the Wayans brothers where the idea was this dude was gonna be pretend to be a girl and become the greatest WNBA player of all time?

It was played for laughs. That was the satire of, “Oh, there’s no way this could ever happen,” and now, in theory, this is a legitimate thing that threatens to destroy all of women’s athletics! If you can just decide what your gender is and — after you’ve already been a successful male athlete — you can become a woman, there’s no point in women’s athletics.

BUCK: This was actually an early tip-off in many ways about where we were heading pre-covid, before the whole covid pandemic happened, because the blue-check MDs — the same ones that appeared to say during lockdowns, “Well, I don’t want anyone gathering except for BLM protests ’cause those are, like, really important.” That same mentality has existed.

You’ve seen this with what you could consider the blue check activist MDs on the issue of transgender rights. They will go out publicly and go into all this babble about how, “Oh, but gender is different from sex and gender identity!” They create all this language to try to obscure the fact that these are men who are biological men — this is an objective, scientific reality.

They have XY chromosome all over in every cell in their body, and they act like this is not something that is observable and distinct and important. And you have to wonder after a while why they want to push this so hard. I really believe this. There’s two things. One, the left needs a new civil rights struggle, a new cause —

CLAY: No doubt.

BUCK: — so they can pretend to be the heroes. This is not a civil rights struggle. This is the left acting like a bunch of lunatics. Okay? That’s one part of it. The other part of it, on transgender competition in sports, we all understand this is wrong. The other part of it, though, Clay is that if they can get you to say that a man is a woman and a woman is a man, what can’t they get you to say? They’ll debase your ability to reason.

CLAY: And what’s wild about this is, we have weight classes for boxing. We have different divisions for sports. Let’s say in high school, based on whether you go to a big school or a small school, 5A, 1A, however it’s classified in your state. We have different gradations of competition based on age. Yet this situation is taking over women’s athletics, and you’re going to have in the record books the greatest women’s swimmer of all time is gonna be a dude.

And people out there on the left are either pretending this story isn’t happening or they are welcoming it as if it is some sign of equality. Maybe we just need to eliminate men’s and women’s athletics in general and go back 100% to the days with only men-woman competitions, ’cause women would never win anything if we had unisex competition.

Recent Stories