×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Covid Truth Finally Breaks Out (For Those Allowed to Say It)

24 Jan 2022

BUCK: Clay and I are two of the people — and you can go back as a matter of public record — who have been saying really from the beginning of the pandemic that we abandoned, as a society, things that we had known for a long time. We allowed a so-called expert consensus to be formed in science when science is not about consensus. Science is a process of analyzing data, of testing and retesting hypotheses, and yet that was all kicked to the side, and it was, “Do whatever Fauci and those around him say or else!”

And now people are starting to realize, “What is the end state here? Massive, catastrophic failure to stop the spread with the mass vaccination campaign as you know, massive failure to stop the spread with the mask policies that are out there.” Right now, we just got word — Clay and I just got word — that Senator Rand Paul came on our show last week for an interview where now not only is it pulled off of YouTube, but our show…

Fortunately, we’re on Rumble, by the way. Please, start following on places like Rumble. Start following us on Gettr and these alternative platforms because speaking the truth is gonna get you kicked off. We’re suspended for a week on YouTube right now because of this madness. People are realizing something crazy is going on here.

Now, I want to talk about what we do with this. But Clay shared this clip over the weekend on Twitter. It went mega viral, and we have Bari Weiss who — we can talk about her background in a second. She’s a centrist, maybe center-right, maybe central-left person depending on the issue finally saying she is done with this.

WEISS: This is going to be remembered by the younger generation as a catastrophic moral crime. The city of Flint, Michigan — which is 80%, I think, minority students — has just announced indefinite virtual schooling. In the past two years, we’ve seen among young girls, a 51% increase in self-harm. People are killing themselves. They are anxious. They are depressed. They are lonely. That is why we need to end it more than any inconvenience that it’s been to the rest of us, I think it’s a pandemic —

CROWD: (wild cheers and applause)

WEISS: It’s like at this point, it’s a pandemic of bureaucracy. It’s a pandemic of bureaucracies. It’s not real anymore.

CLAY: Okay. So, Buck, what I would say stood out to me on Saturday early morning when I saw that clip and I shared it and it went super viral on Twitter was the reaction from the crowd. The cheering. Now, you’ve done Bill Maher’s show before. I never have.

BUCK: Couple times. Yeah.

CLAY: You can say what the culture of the show and the fan base and the crowd is like far better than I can, but it’s filmed in L.A. It is a Hollywood-centric show in that it is overwhelmingly watched — by and large, as it airs on HBO — by a quote-unquote, “elite media audience,” and the way that that crowd reacted, Buck, as they were… It was as if they were walking in the desert, and somebody finally gave them a bit of water.

Now, Bari Weiss did not say anything that you and I have not been saying for two years, that many of our guests have not by saying for two years. But what is significant about it is not only the reaction, Buck, but the way that the reaction occurs is the expansion of what is acceptable to say now is suddenly moving in our direction in a big way. And that’s why I wanted to share that clip. Because a year ago when you and I were saying all these things —

BUCK: Eighteen months ago, Clay.

CLAY: Yeah. Well, even a year ago, even earlier this year people would scream at us that we wanted their grandmas dead, how dare we have these opinions. And now you’ve got many left wingers there — at least a persuadable segment of the left wing — that is looking around and finally willing to say publicly what many of them may have said privately.

After that clip, Buck, I was texting with one of my good friends whose super high up in the Hollywood establishment, and he was saying to me, “This is what people have been saying in private for a long time here. What’s changing is people suddenly feel like they can say it in public.”

BUCK: Well, it’s also who is allowed to say these things.

CLAY: True.

BUCK: As you know, we’ve had Scott Gottlieb, former FDA chairman, who’s one of these big blue check docs — and we’ve got some sound bites of his today even on the show we will play. He said cloth masks don’t work very well. You’ve had Dr. Leana Wen who’s the former Planned Parenthood director — may God have mercy on her soul — and she is somebody who also saying cloth masks don’t work very well.

And here we are in a circumstance, Clay, where we are seeing, finally, people saying things that we’ve been saying for a long time, but they’re allowed to say it, which is so interesting. Rand Paul was on this show? I’m sure it’s… Masks is really the gateway drug for all the tyranny. I’ve been saying this from the beginning. Masks lead to all the other things, which is why they’re so control obsessed over this.

You cannot find me an intelligent person right now who will sit down and have a debate that cloth masks have been an effective and useful part of this. It doesn’t exist. If you think that you’re just not very bright. A lot of people that know it doesn’t work, but it was a necessary symbol and mechanism of control and so they’re slow to let it go. The CDC just put out a tier of masking now, right? N95s, surgical masks, cloth masks.

And this is the circumstance that we find ourselves going through where they won’t actually relent, they won’t let this go. Instead, they just say things to us like, “It’s not that effective’ do the more Draconian thing.” Bari Weiss, welcome to the team on this, I would say, but I’m also not addressed. I see her; I say to myself, “People should have figured this out a long time ago,” and it’s not courageous after the mass failure of the vaccine program to stop the spread to say, “Maybe vaccine mandates weren’t such a great idea either.”

CLAY: Well, this is… I got a great question. And, by the way, thank you to everybody who came out, WSFX 92.5 Fort Myers. We had hundreds of listeners come to an event Friday night and we had so many great questions. People really missed you not being there, Buck. A lot of people wanted to make sure that you were doing well as you completed your Omicron quarantine. But I got a great question, and this is really what motivates me when I get out of bed in the morning every day, Buck.

“How do we win? How do we change things?” and I understand there’s some people out there who are like, “Well, we win by getting 50% plus one or we win by getting 269 electoral votes, and we take it to the House, and we win the election there.” I don’t want to win by a little bit, because winning by a little bit prolongs these internecine battles that are going on in the country. I want to destroy people. I don’t want to win by a little bit, Buck, ’cause I just had to go watch my Tennessee Titans choke away their chance to play for the AFC Championship this weekend trying to win by a little bit.

I want to wipe the floor with my opponent. I want to destroy them. And the way you win, to me, is when the Bari Weisses of the world recognize the legitimacy of the arguments that you and I have said. And I understand that — and it’s frustrating on some level, but I’ve gotten past it. When you and I say it, the blue check left wingers are not willing to hear us sometimes because it’s you and I speaking, and so they have to hear it from someone that they deem to be legitimate. So if Scott Gottlieb says it or if Bari Weiss says it or if fricking Jake Tapper says it, if they were saying — finally acknowledging — the arguments that we have made for a couple years, I’m willing, because that’s how you win in the big game.

BUCK: So I want to bring them in too. So this is where I think the tactics are important but also there’s some complications, some nuance and there will be some differences of opinion even on the right about this stuff. Yes, we want to bring people over on this one — and Bari Weiss, by the way, I mentioned this before, she left the New York Times because they wouldn’t actually let her publish conservative voices. So she’s not… I don’t know how to define her politics, but she’s been a friend to a lot of conservative truth for a long time in a lot of ways. So she’s not some…

CLAY: She’s open-minded, right?

BUCK: This isn’t Nicholas Kristof who’s just a doctrinaire commie, basically, who wants to be the governor, I guess… Oh, no. He can’t. Too bad he can’t. But this isn’t like someone of that positioning on the left. What I want to be very careful of is this: It’s not, “Oh, great. They’re starting to agree with us now. Let’s all just sort of move on and be friends.” It’s, “Okay. We got Bari, we got all these other people who are saying what is true and what we’ve been saying.

“We need to repudiate and at some level humiliate these bad ideas,” and that means accountability for the stupidity of Fauciism. It’s not enough to say, “All right. We give. We give. Finally we’ve had enough of this.” It has to be, we never should have done this, we never should have shut down schools, Fauci is a little coward, Walensky doesn’t know what the heck she’s doing.

These people made disastrous choices, we suffered, and we can never go down this route again because my concern is we’re gonna have this election midterm year of relative sanity and then you’re gonna find out, “Oh, wait it’s December of 2022? Better mask up on that plane! Better get ready for double-masking season.” You know what I’m saying?

CLAY: I understand that fear.

BUCK: We build this coalition of truth, great. But we have to say, “No, no, no. It’s not that I guess we’ll try something else now. It’s that Fauciism was stupid, destructive, and evil.” That’s what I want to make sure we hit on.

CLAY: I agree, and I also think the way that you reflect that is by kicking ass in the midterms. Because you have to make Democrats terrified of 2024 such that they run for the hills. Frankly, Buck, like we’re seeing with defund the police, it’s almost impossible to find a Democrat now or a left-winger anyone who will even acknowledge that they ever said defund the police. I think that’s what’s gonna happen with masks. I think that’s what we’re starting to see with lockdowns. There is going to be — and I believe Dr. Fauci is going to be held accountable.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

James O’Keefe on His New Book: American Muckracker

24 Jan 2022

CLAY: Project Veritas‘ James O’Keefe. He joins us now. James, what’s the latest on — it’s crazy to say this, but — the FBI investigation into the daughter of Joe Biden, the journal…? Kind of fill people in like how crazy this whole story has been.

O’KEEFE: Well, the latest… It’s hard to summarize in a New York minute, but I’ll do my best. The federal judge ordered the FBI to stop going through my phones. A federal judge has assigned what’s called a specializing master to oversee the FBI after the FBI raided my home, took my two iPhones, which is a horrible violation of my rights as an American journalist. Again, a source transmitted me the daughter of the president’s diary some year, year and few months ago.

We did think it was stolen. Now it’s coming out it wasn’t, but even if it was, it was my right as a reporter to receive information and publish it. I chose not to. There’s a lot of unanswered questions, and this one’s just a complete stunner. It doesn’t make any sense why the Department of Justice would execute a federal search warrant on a journalist’s home for a source transmitting document.

U.S. attorneys in the Southern District of New York argued before the judge that I’m, quote, “not a journalist,” because I, quote, “don’t get consent from the people” I report on, Buck. This is an argument so absurd and so preposterous it was rejected by the judge. But the question remains: Why is my government targeting me? Is it because I’m doing the right thing?

Is it because we’re exposing what people don’t want to be exposed? Well, that’s the paragon of journalism. It’s what I write about in this book called American Muckraker. Certainly, they’ve been coming after me for years for exposing what people don’t want exposed. But there’s a lot of unanswered questions, and I don’t know what the answer to those questions are.

BUCK: Yeah, James, I’m sorry to pose another question I think you probably will have a difficult time answering ’cause I’m not sure — in fact, I would wager — the DOJ couldn’t even answer it. But even taking their stolen property premise prominently, and I’m essentially asking you now to go into the minds of the American Cheka, for those who are historians or know about the secret police inside of Russia pre-KGB. They’re telling you that it was a stolen journal. How is that a federal crime? (laughing) That’s a part of it. How would that be the FBI? It’s someone’s diary.

O’KEEFE: Well, first of all, it appears not to have been stolen by virtue of their own admissions in recent revelations and documents and New York Times stories where it was abandoned.

BUCK: Right. Important point, James. But let’s just… I’m trying to say their pretext here, which clearly it is a pretext —

O’KEEFE: I don’t think they care, man. I don’t think they care. I really don’t. I was incarcerated in 2010 — a story which I write about in American Muckraker — where they have me in shackles and they say, “Oh, you that boy that did them ACORN story,” referring to a story about I did about ACORN, these federal officials in New Orleans.

BUCK: We remember that. Yeah.

O’KEEFE: And then they said, “Oh, you the boy that did the ACORN. We gonna have to keep you overnight.” This is about power! This isn’t about justice or law or standards or anything. They would never, ever, ever raid a home of a 60 Minutes reporter, obviously, because that would create a backlash. And in this case, Buck, it did create a backlash by the ACLU. The ACLU defended me. the Reporters Committee defended me, the Society of Professional Journalists.

How many times in your career have you guys seen the ACLU defend someone like me because the Supreme Court of the United States has established in Bartnicki v. Vopper from 2001 that a journalist has a right — a constitutional right — to receive a document from a source, even if that document was stolen by a third-party, so long as I had nothing to do with the theft. Why is the FBI raiding journalists’ homes over someone’s diary?

Well, that’s a question that seems to have a self-evident answer, but I don’t want to speculate. But furthermore (chuckling), why are the Feds involved? And obviously, you know, it was slightly terrifying at the time, but it has not stopped us. If anything, it’s emboldened us. More people are coming to us now than ever before because they seem to trust us by virtue of the fact that we are being targeted by our government.

CLAY: Well, first of all, I give credit to the ACLU for standing on principle here, as opposed to standing on politics because it’s a hundred percent on the right side to be defending you. But we know that the ACLU has not always been standing on principle of late. But I just wanted to ask you this, James, ’cause I think it’s kind of a fascinating question. Imagine that Ivanka Trump had had a journal that contained potentially disparaging commentary about Donald Trump and that journal had made its way to a journalist and — while Trump was president — the FBI had raided that journalist’s home. The resulting fallout is what?

O’KEEFE: That’s a paradox because that would never happen. It’s an American paradox, and I think we’re living through history. I don’t know how else to put it. I write in this book American Muckraker, the suffering that we have to endure as citizens for doing the right thing and the pain, clearly you have to be a masochist to do what we do here because no one wants to be in handcuffs. They put me in handcuffs.

They had a battering ram at 6 a.m. and they raided my home, and it was a kind of psychological carnage. For doing the right thing, by the way. Because you want to be presented with a paradox, here’s one. What should I have done? If someone sends me a document, we try to corroborate it. I failed to — or at least I thought I failed to — authenticate the document. It appears to have been authenticated by now.

But at the time you stumble across something as a reporter, you try to corroborate it. You try to do the right thing. And I said, “You know what? I don’t think public eye should see this, these writings because I can’t verify them if they occurred and if it belongs to her with a hundred percent accuracy,” and then I tried to give it back to local law enforcement in Florida — and then my home gets raided and they put me in handcuffs.

So, this is a dystopian piece of science fiction. But I think if you keep going — and this is the message of my book, America Muckraker. If you keep going… We just had a story last week involving documents from the Department of Defense that Anthony Fauci talked about them in the Senate. The source came to us with those documents precisely because the FBI is targeting Project Veritas, and because the New York Times works in harmony with the FBI. This is the reality that we’re living in, and we have to figure out how to do journalism in Clown World.

BUCK: Speaking to James O’Keefe. He has a new book out, American Muckraker. James, I’m just gonna put this out there: How many journalists, even in back channel, right — ’cause obviously if you work at CNN or New York Times, whom I think are journalistic entities that are devoted to the destruction of conservatism and conservatives generally.

But you specifically, I think that’s fair to say, I think they would be very pleased to see you not only ruined professionally but even imprisoned if they could, if they get away with it. Do any journalists, though, reach out to you who are from mainstream publications and say, “Hey, I just appreciate that you actually do what we pretend to do,” or they too scared?

O’KEEFE: I would say they’re too scared to say that publicly. Many do reach out. Some, in fact, do do it publicly. Ben Smith at the New York Times — and I think he was quite courageous. Now, what’s ironic is that he just left the New York Times. I don’t know if these two are related. Ben Smith came out and said, “Journalists should not be cheerleading the attacks against Project Veritas,” and once Ben gave others the permission to do so, you had a lot of others come out like Trevor Timm at Freedom of the Press Foundation.

But most of these things that people say are said covertly. You know, for example, we have a story — I’ll break a little news on your program — of New York Times reporters who are covertly recorded. That’s gonna be coming out in a few weeks. And the things that they say and the things that we’ve heard people say inside CNN is that CNN is not doing what they’re supposed to do. But most of these people, of course, have their mortgage and they have their pensions, and they have their material possessions in life.

And they’re too afraid to go against the established narrative because, let’s face it, the New York Times and CNN have enormous power because of the power that’s granted to them by the algorithms at tech. So if you go against that orthodoxy, you will be targeted, defamed, have your reputation dragged through the mud, and people just don’t like that. I write about, in this book, how to survive that psychological abuse, how to deal with it, how to muster the strength and sometimes the courage by telling the stories of people who did blow the whistle and did take those arrows. And it’s not as bad as you might think, particularly in this day and age when there is a majority of people on our side.

BUCK: James O’Keefe, founder of Project Veritas. American Muckraker is the book. James, stay safe, man. Come back and talk to us. Tell us how the fight goes.

O’KEEFE: Thank you.

Recent Stories

VIP Bonus Video: Watch C&B Talk to James O’Keefe

24 Jan 2022

After finding out we’ve been banned on YouTube for Friday’s interview with Senator Rand Paul, who better to speak with than James O’Keefe of Project Veritas, author of the new book, American Muckraker.

Look inside the C&B studios in Nashville and NYC as Clay and Buck speak with O’Keefe, who knows something about being the enemy of Big Tech.

Only 24/7 members can watch this exclusive video.

If you’re not a member, sign up now. You can also use the special VIP email pipeline to Clay and Buck to share whatever is on your mind.

Watch It Here:

Recent Stories

What Will Biden Do? Why Ukraine Matters

24 Jan 2022

BUCK: Ukraine. We’ll break it down. I’ll put on — I don’t know — an ex-CIA hat. Is that a thing? I’ll put on my ex-CIA hat. Clay and I will get into the latest here. I think the biggest implications, of course, are what it means for U.S. military, U.S. involvement, which I think this whole audience knows we do not want to go to war in any capacity with Russia over Ukraine.

I think that’s where… Let’s talk about who’s pushing for what and what the Biden regime is doing right now. We will get into all of that. We’ve got one guy who will be familiar to some of you from the second impeachment of Trump, who’s saying we could be on the cusp of a World War II-style war in Europe, which is completely insane. Clay, it’s nuts.

CLAY: Well, I want to really dive into this Ukraine thing, ’cause I was having a conversation with my wife last night and my oldest son, and I think the vast majority of people out there, first of all, couldn’t point to Ukraine on a map. Let’s start here. Democrats, Republicans, independents, most people don’t know anything about Ukraine. I had to look it up. Have you been to Ukraine?

BUCK: Have not. Have not.

CLAY: Okay. You’ve all over the world so I thought you might have been to Ukraine. I think a lot of people’s question is, “Why should I care?” That’s the question that I get most commonly about Ukraine, and so you are the former CIA spook. You are the guy who has knowledge of international affairs, frankly, on a level that I do not. Why should I and many people out there like me who are not aggressively following foreign affairs in Eastern Europe, care about what happens in Ukraine?

BUCK: Very good question that not a lot of people have a particularly good answer to right now. Can I just put a pin in that question?

CLAY: Let’s discuss that this hour.

BUCK: Let’s do Ukraine. Let’s do Ukraine. But I just want to mention the World War II-style war. This is Lieutenant Colonel Vindman. Remember this guy from the Ukraine phone call, everybody, where “Oh, Donald Trump needed to be impeached over this”? The whole thing was so absurd. Of course, now Vindman’s a hero to the left. He was nonpartisan. He was a veteran. He’s nonpartisan. That’s what they were saying. Here’s what he’s saying now about this.

VINDMAN: I think we’re basically just on the cusp of war. (sputtering) I think it’s all about certain in my mind that there’s going to be a large European war on the order of magnitude of World War II with air power, sea power, massive gun force and offensives. I think at this point we also need to start preparing for the day after, the day of the outcome, for the humanitarian catastrophe that’s going to unfold in Europe — and we’re gonna have to come to the reality that there are going to be seismic effects on the geopolitical landscape, the economic landscape the American people should be aware of. Because they’re going to be direct impact on the U.S. economy, on U.S. national security, and we should just be doing everything we can to prepare for that. But the ball is in — in Putin’s court.

BUCK: Okay. There’s so much wrong here that it’s hard to just even say it’s wrong. Let’s start with 40 to 60 million people, depending on whose estimates, died in the Second World War. Civilians, military, all across the board. On the battlefield, in the death camps, in the bombings, everything, 40 to 60 million is the number I think that most people use. So let’s call it roughly 40 million, and that’s insane. That’s not gonna happen.

Clay, we already had Russia take Crimea. Russia is already at war in some capacity in eastern Ukraine, and it is not causing a conflagration that’s brought in all of NATO and European nations and all the rest of it. You’re asking, why should we care? The answer is: Most people don’t really care to the point where they think that we should put any military force involved here. Ukraine is an allied country, so we want to help or allies. We don’t want anything bad to happen to Ukraine.

But it’s not our fight, and so you’re asking me why do we care? It’s all a question of how much do we care not why we care because we don’t want war anywhere but what do we do about it in this context? The Biden administration is considering moving U.S. military right on the periphery of Ukraine, which would be NATO countries. A little while really gonna do? There’s a big difference, and Putin knows it, between invading a NATO allied country and invading Ukraine right now.

That’s, at least, understood. But if this is something that breaks out into some kind of a military confrontation, there will be Ukrainians who are fighting, and there will be international outrage and sanctions. It’s not gonna turn into World War II, though. And that’s just unhelpful and I think kind of crazy to see at this point.

CLAY: Yeah. Look, I care in the context of I support democracy around the world. When I say, “Why should I care?” I mean it in the context of, “Why should I care about the United States getting involved in this particular battle?”

BUCK: Do we care to the point where you would send your sons in 10 years in the same situation?

CLAY: And the answer is “no.” I would be opposed. I’ve got three boys. I would be opposed to any of them being sent to Ukraine to fight against Russia invading. Some of you out there may disagree. The bigger picture question I guess, Buck, is if opportunity somehow took — based on what happened in Crimea and also what may happen in Ukraine. If he took a limited, muted, insubstantial response from allied democracies around the world to mean that he could further invade, do we get into a situation…?

I mean other countries. Do we get into a situation where he feels like he has free rein to go back after other former Soviet satellites that have now declared their independence because they are a traditional part of Mother Russia? I suppose that would be the concern is that there’s a form of appeasement in, “Oh, it’s only Crimea. Oh, it’s only Ukraine,” and he decides to keep pushing the envelope with the misguided belief being that there’s not gonna be any consequences for his actions.

BUCK: There’s also the realities of what the Russian military could even accomplish if they took the most expansionist and aggressive posture, right? The Russian economy is under $2 trillion a year. It’s like $1.6/$1.7 trillion. The French economy, just one country in NATO, one European country is $3 trillion, just by way of comparison, right? So before we all start getting worked up about it, this is not the Soviet Union. They do not have the same force-projection capabilities. They do have a large nuclear stockpile.

I don’t think anybody thinks they’re about to start nuking NATO countries and destroy the world. Everyone needs to take a step back and calm down a little bit who’s talking about this in such overheated and, I think, apocalyptic terms. What we’re gonna do is what we’ve in the past, largely, with these issues where we try to convince Russia not to engage in these acts. There are red lines.

Invading a NATO country is a red line. Now, you can argue about whether that should be a red line for our military, but that is a red line, right? We are contractually bound in a sense through the NATO charter to take military action in response to any Russian incursion into a NATO country. Ukraine is not a NATO country, okay? (chuckles)

So we’re dealing with a different circumstance here. And Russia already has substantial footholds in that country, not just seizing of Crimea, but also in the eastern Donbass region. And that’s been ongoing now for years. So you’re in a different place, a different situation, and the Biden administration… I do think it’s funny they didn’t try any of this crap during Trump — let’s just point that out — the Russian puppet Trump.

CLAY: That’s exactly right. I was just gonna say, Buck, here’s my concern. We’ve never really seen this happen with a country that has nuclear weapons, right? We understand that Iran wants to get nuclear weapons. North Korea wants to get nuclear weapons. But it’s almost like you’re shadow boxing when I hear, “Oh, we’re gonna have a World War II-style battle,” well, yeah, but in World War II there wasn’t at the beginning of World War II the ability to inflict mass casualty events with atomic bombs, right?

We hadn’t had the Manhattan Project. So my concern is just, Buck, if you’ve ever seen a schoolhouse fight, two guys get into a fistfight, most of the time it ends with a fistfight. Guys are over it; you get all the angst out. But sometimes a guy the bets his ass kicked. And he feels so bad about the fact that he got his ass kicked that he goes to the next level — knife, gun, whatever it might be — and he feels like in order to get back whatever he lost in terms of the perception of his toughness or of his power or of his overall impact, he goes to the next level.

I could see… This is what concerns me a little bit about getting involved militarily here. To your point, Buck, on the size of the Russian economy, for instance, Russia is an embarrassed country. Putin really, his entire regime, is about the collapse of the Soviet Union and trying to recapture — based on my reading of this — some of the culture cache that existed. Russia is a humiliated, in some ways, country. And humiliated, backed-into-the-corner countries don’t always behave rationally. So my concern is when they have the ability to go to that next level, Russia’s like the guy who loses a fistfight and decides, “I’m gonna bring out the next level of weaponry.”

BUCK: But there’s really no likelihood that Russia would… To your point out, we’re talking about nukes, right? This is what makes everyone so concerned. Russia’s conventional military is advanced and capable. But look at what an advanced and capable military like ours accomplishing in 20 years in Afghanistan in terms of occupation. Seizing territory with people that are culturally linguistically different from you who don’t want you there is a very, very complicated thing.

Now, another complicating factor in this is that in the eastern part of Ukraine, as well as other parts of Ukraine, there are a lot of Russian speakers who are also Ukrainian speakers but do have affinity for the Russian Federation, do feel like their interests would be better served in some contexts if there were a closer relationship, at least, with the Kremlin. So it’s not as cut and dry. It’s obviously not the same thing as when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan and the disaster that they went through there. But in terms of escalation to the true nuclear option of using nuclear weapons, they’re looking to control Ukraine. They’re not looking to make take wasteland of nuclear fallout for the next 500 years, right?

CLAY: I’m talking about going after one of the NATO countries with nuclear weapons.

BUCK: The Russian military does not really have the capability to do that, and they wouldn’t take that risk. Beyond that, I don’t think they want that, right? They want… Ukraine has a tremendous importance in the Russian mind-set. Remember, Ukraine had the third… People forget this. After The Wall fell, Ukraine had the third most nuclear weapons in the world when the Soviet Union fell.

Ukraine actually gave up its nukes as part of an agreement which the U.K. and Great Britain were signatories to — as well as Russia, by the way. “We will defend your territorial integrity. Don’t worry! Just give up your nukes ’cause you can’t really be trusted as this country right now to keep full control over them and handle them.” There is a lesson here. One: When you got nukes, you never give up your nukes. And, two, I think that people need to understand that there is a long-standing desire from within Russia to have not just a closer relationship but perhaps a symbiotic relationship with Ukraine that is gonna outpace whatever diplomatic rancor we come up with from the U.S. and NATO side of this.

CLAY: Worth mentioning too: A lot of European countries are so desperately in need of Russian gas and oil that they’re not gonna really stand up to Russia. For instance, Germany, their entire economy would collapse if they lost their access to Russian oil and gas.

BUCK: So would the Russian economy though, right? So kind of mutually assured destruction.

CLAY: There’s a symbiosis there that I think maybe didn’t exist in earlier days of the Cold War because Russia has joined more of the global economic system.

BUCK: Russia… Just for everybody, Russia’s not about to like invade Latvia, Poland, Romania. They couldn’t do it. They couldn’t do it. They would actually just start losing horribly and this is not gonna happen. So people need to take a step back, calm down. I think what Vindman said about World War II-style war is completely insane, and so that’s where we are right now. Everyone just take a deep breath. We’ve got this one covered. This audience knows we’re gonna… Well, we know what’s going on here. Does the Biden regime? That’s the part of it. What are they gonna do? That does get me a little concerned.

Recent Stories

The Fauciite Legacy: Libs Could Wear Masks Forever

24 Jan 2022

CLAY: The View is important because it gives you… If you want to have a sense of what “the view” is, so to speak, of the mind-set or from inside the mind of, you know, semiliterate liberals across America, you turn on The View for a second. You see, “What is the lowest common denominator of lib politics today and what do they think and believe?” It is instructive in that sense but they’re already making the case what we’ve been saying for a long time is already happening which is that you’re gonna have to do this crazy stuff forever. Listen.

BUCK: I’m sorry. I feel bad. It’s like listening, Clay, to someone who’s having an ongoing panic attack being televised nationally for everyone to see. These people are nuts. There’s something wrong. They need therapy. They need emotional and psychological assistance. And, unfortunately, we have to call this out because they’re making it worse for other people that are having this anxiety disorder, too, by making it seem normal. It is not normal.

CLAY: Their fears should not take away from yours and mine’s and everybody out there listening’s freedoms, and I think that’s an important message to put out there. If she feels so terrified to go on a subway without a mask, it’s not a normal issue. You are a neurotic, you are a germophobe, you are likely providing no benefit to yourself at all. But you can make that choice.

What should occur is your freedoms and your psychological instability and your irrational fear should not be allowed to take away the freedoms of the rest of us. And that, unfortunately, is what’s happening. And my wife said this, Buck, and we set the over-under on this. How long is it gonna be that you have to wear a mask on an airplane? How is this going to end? I don’t know if it’s going to end before 2024.

Now, I will say I took two flights this weekend. I’m flying down to Texas this weekend too. I’ll see whether or not it’s the same. I usually fly Southwest Airlines. Nobody on either flight… I don’t know if this is a new Southwest policy. Nobody on either flight from a flight attendant perspective ever said to anyone that I saw, “You need to lift your mask.” First flight I have been on in a year and a half since they first started mandating back in May of 2020.

That was the first flight I took where they said, “Hey, you have to have a mask on.” This is the first time I’ve been on a flight where when you gave your ticket to get onto the airplane where when you were sitting on the plane both of these flights not one flight attendant did I hear say, “Hey, you have to get your mask up. You need your mask is up. It’s down below your nose.” It didn’t happen the entire flight.

BUCK: Clay, anybody who is enforcing — or pushing others to enforce at risk of losing their jobs or being sanctioned in some way — a mask-up-between-bites policy is engaged in obvious absurdity. We need to be very clear — and Fauci, if we had a real press, would be pushed on this, should be pushed on this. People should say, “Excuse me. The planes aren’t even situation where you could keep the mask on the whole time, unless you’re gonna tell everybody you’re not allowed to eat and not allowed to drink.” See how well that goes over, by the way, for people on six-, eight-, 12-, 14-hour flights, to drinking or else with kids. Think about this.

CLAY: The other thing that happened, I fly Southwest out of Nashville because it’s the most common airline. Buck, for a year, over, like, a year and a half now, they’ve walked around when they’ve given you a beverage, and they had a placard, and you had to hold one, two, three, or four fingers up to demonstrate what you wanted to drink. It’s like water, Coke, whatever the options were. No alcohol.

You hold up the fingers. They’ve done away with that, and so I wonder if they’re trying to tiptoe back to normalcy without making a big show of because they were giving normal drinks and they were not telling anybody, “Hey, you have to pull up your mask, make sure your…” and it was two different flights. I wonder if there’s been something that went out, if you work at Southwest or you’re a flight attendant, have you gotten an indication that you don’t need to be as Draconian in your policing of masks of late, I’d love to know.

BUCK: There are clearly people who were also using the hysteria, the ongoing hysteria out there primarily for control and for controlling other people. They get a kick out of the power trip. There’s no question about it. In California at the Unified School Board meeting, this is what… You gotta hear this. They’re trying to start the school board meeting. Remember school boards, you got libs getting attacked all over the country, so they hate this — attacked verbally, of course. But they hate actually having to answer for the bad policies and decisions they make. So they just say, “Oh, your mask isn’t worn correctly! Shut it down. Shut it all down.”

TRUSTEE LEANDRA BLADES: I was watching Dr. Fauci…

BOARD PRESIDENT CARRIE BUCK: We have to wait! This is not part of — of comments.

TRUSTEE LEANDRA BLADES: I was just going to address to speakers at the podium because we have —

BOARD PRESIDENT CARRIE BUCK: You also need to have your mask on.

TRUSTEE LEANDRA BLADES: Well, I’m speaking now.

BOARD PRESIDENT CARRIE BUCK: It’s not about sp… You have to wear it no matter when you’re speaking.

TRUSTEE LEANDRA BLADES: Dr. Fauci was able to. Dr. Fauci spoke without his mask on.

BOARD PRESIDENT CARRIE BUCK: In this building, we have to wear masks.

TRUSTEE LEANDRA BLADES: Okay. (laughing)

CROWD: (laughing)

TRUSTEE LEANDRA BLADES: So — so I’m also seeing that people aren’t wearing them correctly. So we have —

BOARD PRESIDENT CARRIE BUCK: So at this time, I’m going to adjourn the meeting at 6:02!

BUCK: Just shut it down, Clay. Oh, you’re in a town hall meeting and you don’t like it? You don’t like that the peasants are speaking out against the school board, somebody without a mask? Shut it down. Shut it all down. They are out of their minds on this one.

CLAY: They think they’re on the right side, Buck. That is maybe what is the most alarming, all these people are convinced they’re on the right side of history. And, by the way, they haven’t studied much history, because if they had, they would understand that the people who are taking away freedom are very rarely — in the long run — considered to be on the right side of history.

Recent Stories

New Zealand Has Gone Completely Nuts

24 Jan 2022

CLAY: The other country outside of China that is attempting to still implement a Zero Covid policy is New Zealand — and, Buck, we’ve talked about how Australia always had this reputation as this sunny, crocodile-infested, “Let’s have a beer, put another shrimp on the barbie” kind of vibe.

BUCK: Britain with a tan, you know? It was like Britain where you could get some sun and hang out and good things. Now it is East Germany with koalas.

CLAY: It’s well said (chuckles) and they’ve at least abandoned their Zero Covid strategy, notwithstanding what happened with Novak Djokovic and not allowing him into the country for the Aussie Open. But this is crazy what’s going on in New Zealand. They have decided even in the face of Omicron to basically lock down the entire country yet anew. Listen to Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern as she breaks them down.

ARDERN: The whole of New Zealand will move into the resetting of the traffic light system at 11:59 p.m. tonight, Sunday 23 January.

BUCK: The whole country, Clay — full on, the red light system — full on lockdown again for Omicron, which you have had, I have had. Remember, I’ve had both forms of covid; I know you’ve had both forms of covid. The first one sucked. I’m not gonna lie. The first one was rough. It’s like getting a bad flu. It was not something you wanted to get. I got it, I’m fine, whatever.

Omicron, I’ve been calling it wimpycron. I also want to understand, as a separate matter, if it’s 10 to 20 to 30 times less dangerous than Delta, Clay, who — and 95%, 99% of everything in the U.S. is Omicron now, who’s in the hospital and who’s dying of what? Are they dying from Omicron? ‘Cause I want to know how the numbers add up. But New Zealand is crazy to bring it back here. New Zealand is completely insane. They’re never gonna be able to do this.

CLAY: Without federalism, we would have been Australia and we would have been Canada and we would have been locked down, I think, still in a ridiculous manner. And, by the way, I don’t think anyone would have changed. Look at the numbers in Texas and California as it pertains to Omicron. Texas actually has done better. It’s crazy. None of these policies work.

Recent Stories

Why Do We Get So Upset When Our Teams Lose?

24 Jan 2022

BUCK: Adam in Crystal River, Florida. Adam, welcome.

CALLER: Thank you. Clay, I loved your show on OutKick and followed you to this show. But I need some advice.

CLAY: Yes?

CALLER: As a Bucs fan, I feel your pain. After observing my frustration and heartache, my 15-year-old daughter asked me, “Why do I get so upset over teams’ loss of players that I don’t know personally, but don’t get nearly as upset when my daughters lose their soccer games?”

CLAY: (laughing)

CALLER: I had no answer for her, and she stumped me. How do I explain myself and my actions?

CLAY: It’s a very good question. So, one, the easy out for you is, you judge professionals to a higher standard than you do children. An easy out for you is those people are making millions of dollars, so when they make mistakes you get more angry at them than you do at your daughter’s soccer teammates when they make mistakes (chuckles) because they’re not professionals and they’re still playing at a young age. That is the explanation that I think makes by far the most sense.

Buck, I am still furious — to the point that I guarantee you I will have trouble sleeping for a third straight night — over my Tennessee Titans losing to the Cincinnati Bengals and choking away the game. I am way too old, and I recognize that it makes no logical sense, and I realize that it makes me sound ridiculous, but I will not be able to sleep well for a third straight night. Now, to be fair, when my 9- and 10-year-old team that I coached basketball?

When we lost a game and I thought I had done a bad job coaching it — we lost the championship game — I also had trouble sleeping then. Now, that time I was directly connected to it, but I know there’s a lot of people out there listening to me right now — Packers fans especially, a lot of people in Milwaukee, a lot of down in Tampa Bay, a lot of people in Nashville and a lot of people in Buffalo (for sure) — that are in the exact same trouble as me having trouble sleep.

BUCK: I used to yell a lot when I was on sports teams — at my team, with my team, for my team — and when I coached, I also liked to yell. I just lack that emotional… I think it’s ’cause I went to a college where the football team’s linemen were about my size. It was D3 was tiny, no one cared. So it was very tough to get excited about it in any meaningful way.

Recent Stories

The View Turns on Fellow Lib Bill Maher

24 Jan 2022

BUCK: We were happy to see that at least some libs — and Clay I will say that is probably the most left-wing audience, the Bill Maher audience, that you will come across anywhere in the media landscape.

CLAY: They were cheering like how you would break that down.

BUCK: I manage… I’ve been on that show twice. Once was right before the pandemic, and once was about, I don’t know, maybe six months before the pandemic. When you have people who are just gonna boo everything you say when you’re conservative that can be a tough one. They clapped and I think it is because everyone’s starting to realize that unless they stop, this goes on forever with the covid mitigation stuff.

CLAY: (chuckling)

BUCK: But not everybody, not everybody is happy to see that sanity is getting a toehold even on the left — a toehold. The left is still crazy. Fauci is not done. He’s not leaving until the Republicans take back power in the midterms because then I would want them to hold hearing every day where they essentially just grill that guy and make him answer for what he’s done to so many people.

CLAY: Cry. I want Fauci crying and apologizing to America for his failures.

BUCK: I think he’s the most disastrous public official in living memory in the United States, and he has caused more harm, more misery, more destruction to the economy, more psychological distress and pushed more people to self-harm in America than any other person you can possibly think of. I honestly believe that, and I believed that for months and months now based on the data. So I think he’s horrible. I really mean that and since he’s never coming on the show I guess we can just, you know, put all our cards on the table. But here over at The View, Clay, oh, no, how dare Bill Maher talk about sanity and being reasonable. Whoopi Goldberg will have none of it.

GOLDBERG: That’s (dramatic pause) not really funny to people who’ve lost their kids to this vaccine (sic) or people who lost family members or dear friends to this. It’s just… (sputtering) You know, listen. Nobody on the planet really wants to go through this. This is not something we’re doing because it’s, you know, sexually gratifying. This is what we’re doing to protect our families. And you don’t have to do it, but stay away from everybody! Because if you’re the one who’s not paying the attention, and you’re coughin’ and sneezin’, you don’t want to… (sputtering) then stay out of the public!


BUCK: Okay. We got it. See, here’s the thing. There’s a lot of problems. By the way, she was reacting to Bill Maher saying mask on, mask off, mask between bites, this is for morons. And he’s right, by the way. And everyone listening to this knows he’s right. So she hates that. But notice how her thing is, “Fine. You don’t want to do it? You just don’t ever want to go in society ever again.” No. I’m sorry. The neurotics don’t get to have their totalitarianism forever. That’s actually not acceptable to me.

CLAY: It’s also not effective. Even if you are… Remember there used to be a morality angle to whether or not you got covid? People tried to say, “Oh, how did you get it? Oh, were you not wearing the mask? Oh, did you go to…?” and then everybody got Omicron and suddenly it got way more difficult to make it a morality based angle. “Oh, you got it even though you wear masks all day, every day, and you got double vaxxed and you got boosted and you have limited your being inside of public places.”

It doesn’t really matter. Everybody’s gonna get this; even St. Fauci of the left wing is saying it. So the logic here doesn’t even apply because you can be double boosted, triple boosted. Some of these people, Buck… Talk about mass psychosis? There’s article the other day. Some people have gotten eight or nine or 10 shots, Buck. They have continued to go over and over and over again, which probably is going to create its own possible ability to have all the chaos there.

BUCK: Let’s establish another double standard that’s quite obvious here, Clay. Why isn’t the media…? Remember when the media was making fun of Joe Rogan for horse de-wormer? Total slander. Remember when the media was making fun of people? “Ha-ha, they’re so stupid for drinking fish tank cleaner because they confused it with hydroxy…” which wasn’t even true. That was a whole other thing. That was a fabrication. And they said the hospitals were full of people taking hydroxychloroquine. Also, a lie. Notice how they don’t make fun of or they don’t even point out the stupidity of taking eight shots or 10 shots? People out of their minds. They’re obviously crazy.

CLAY: Psychologically unstable. And we are allowing their instability to govern the lives of many people out there: You, your kids, your family. It’s nonsense.

Recent Stories

Gavin Newsom: California Looks Like a Third World Country

24 Jan 2022

CLAY: Out in California, I know a lot of you are listening to us, and I know a lot of you are fed up with what you’re seeing. We just played you idiot governor from New York talking about masks as equivalent of shoes. Crime is skyrocketing everywhere. Biden doesn’t have a solution for that. He doesn’t have a solution for inflation. But listen to Gavin Newsom saying, “Hey, near the train yards where everybody’s been stealing all these packages, it looks like a Third World country.” Yeah It’s what we’ve been saying for a while, bud.

NEWSOM: I see what you see. I see what you’ve been covering. I see what everybody’s seeing. I’m asking myself, “What the hell is going on?” We look like a Third World country, drawing images on the nightly news day in and day out. Some networks are weaponizing them to their own, you know, political agenda others just reporting the damn news fairly and appropriately. And all I can say, um, is we need to all of us to recognize our collective and individual responsibility to do more and start supporting one another to address these issues.

BUCK: Clay, this is not surprising at all. First of all, I think Gavin Newsom… He is not dumb. He’s just completely shameless and without any moral core to speak of and no real leadership. Gavin Newsom will say whatever he needs to in the moment for the benefit of Gavin Newsom and the Democrat Party’s uni-party control of the state of California. So start with that. This is amazing that this guy goes down.

He’s like, “Oh, gosh! Look at all these packages strewn about everywhere! All these people doing the stealing is such a bad thing. Wow. Somebody really should have been on this for a while.” It’s almost like the guy in Casablanca, you know, he’s “shocked, shocked to find gambling going on in this establishment.” Yeah. No crap. No surprise. When you stop enforcing criminal laws against things like stealing, when you stop arresting people for…

Think about this. If you don’t arrest somebody, what? You’re gonna give them a fine? Does anyone think that the career criminals that might get some kind of a ticket to appear or a ticket to pay a fine give a you-know-what about that? And, Clay, this is all part of the same package of left-wing lunacy that they’ve unveiled in cities across the country where Democrats have total control. In San Francisco now they set up these sites where you can inject drugs.

We’re not even talking about marijuana, folks, okay? We’re talking about hard-core injection of heroin. They’ve set up sites now. So now there’s open-air drug use in San Francisco parks. Is any person listening to this surprised at all to find out that the open-air drug market and injection centers that San Francisco has set up are an abject catastrophe, that London Breed — the mayor of San Francisco — has had to declare a state of crime emergency?

They’ve had to flood cops into some of these zones now, up the budgets for law enforcement, increase their overtime, because it turns out when you let people who are drug addicted do this in full view of everybody out in the public, those people are also often deep and emotionally psychological unwell — some of them have long-standing criminal histories and some of them ray threat to the public. And just now we’re supposed to…? How did they not know this? But really, it’s ideology. They worship at the church of leftism. And all of a sudden, they’re finding out that that has really bad consequences, Clay.

CLAY: I love that Gavin Newsom said, “Some of these people are using it for their own benefit, as opposed to just covering it like the news.” Everybody’s disgusted, Buck! This idea, “Oh, Fox News is showing those clips of the packages being looted in L.A., that’s not appropriate. They’re using it for their own purposes.” Yeah. Their own purposes are “This is wrong. It should be fixed.” That’s what the job of the media often is, or at least used to be.

Shining a bright light on public policy failures and trying to make those public policy failures get remedied. That’s the very essence of what the media’s job should be, and they did such a good job that Gavin Newsom at least had to acknowledge this, because if there wasn’t the media footage of this, he would have pretended like, hunky-dory, nothing’s a problem.

BUCK: Here’s also, I think, why they… It was great journalistic work to show this, because what the thefts going on along the trains there… Can I just point out to everybody, Gavin Newsom is such a slimy little coward that he has already… The Union Pacific Railroad thefts are up 160% in the last year, okay? The last year alone. Gavin Newsom is out there apologizing, Clay, for calling the thieves “gangs.” He has said now, “Forgive me.” This is real, folks. This is a quote: “Forgive me. They’re ‘organized groups.'” This is un-permissioned retail reappropriation. This isn’t gang theft. So that’s part one is that he still —

CLAY: The word “gangs” is offensive now?

BUCK: “Gangs” is offensive. “Gangs” is offensive. Tell Gangs of New York. You go back in history. We’ve been using gang for a long time. But beyond that the visualization of the thefts along the California railroad, when you see it, you recognize this is happening every single day. This is systemic. This is actually going on throughout the whole train system. It’s not even just in this one part of California, I can assure you.

This is happening all of over their state in places where they have these train depots and people really that this is an easy way to steal stuff, and obviously the state didn’t care until now. This isn’t a hard thing to figure out, Clay. Think of all of the reported thefts that must have gone on, and they just let it happen. They just let it happen. I think people have become a little bit terrified because you’ve started to see the caricatures of the past that we’ve had of the left and of liberals when it comes to crime, “Oh, it’s not a big deal.

“Is home invasion really that big a deal? If they’re just breaking into your house to steal your stuff, maybe they need it more than you do.” They’re actually saying that — and I mean district attorneys. I mean mayors. They’re making those cases, have been making those cases publicly. Folks, it’s time for a nationwide housecleaning of leftist absurdity on crime. That’s what needs to happen; I hope Republicans lean into this in the midterms.

CLAY: They should. And, again, the thing that I keep hammering on this, it’s a hundred percent true is, not being concerned about crime is a luxury of a low-crime environment. Believing that people should not be imprisoned is a luxury of a low-crime environment. And what we see happened time after time is the people who are going to end up committing violent crimes, either have done it in the past…

Look at what happened with Waukesha, look at what happened with that girl working the furniture shop in L.A., look at what happened with the woman on the platform in New York who got shoved right in front of the train. All of the people that have committed those crimes, by and large, are often people with huge rap sheets that should have never been on the street. Ironically, maybe the only thing, Buck, that Joe Biden’s almost got right in his entire history was the ’94 crime bill, which he now repudiates. But that helped in a massive way to drive down the overall rates of crime all over this country.

BUCK: You know that this is because of church of liberalism when you think about the irony here of how many leftist Democrats in America today, Clay, that are in favor of incarcerating people for mask violations, are in favor of sending people to not just quarantine camps, but camps for the unvaccinated — we talked about those numbers recently, that 30%, 40% of Democrats are —

CLAY: Yeah, 29% believe that your kids should be taken from you if you’re a Democrat and you’re not unvaccinated.

BUCK: The same people who are making the case about incarcerating you for violations of Fauciism will turn around and say, “Yeah. So we have a career violent criminal. We shouldn’t lock him up for a long time because it might hurt his job prospects.” They think the former is about public safety and the latter does not matter, and that is what the countries is seeing the results of right now. You have to lock up some people for a long time, not just because you need to punish them, but because they’re actually a danger to the public — a bigger danger than failing to double mask alone outside.

CLAY: And, by the way, you also can’t be concerned with whether or not it is a “diverse and inclusive” group of prisoners. You lock up the people who commit violent crimes regardless. It’s so funny, Buck, nobody ever says that our crime laws are sexist, even though men are overwhelmingly charged with violent crimes.

BUCK: Men commit basically all the murders —

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: — 90-plus percent of the murders are men.

CLAY: You go where the crime is. It’s not sexist that men are in prison more than women. It’s because men are more violent than women, and so you find violent offenders, most of whom will be male, and you put them in prison. And then you do it over and over and over again for years, and eventually you can help to solve the issues that befall the country today.

Recent Stories

Democrats Acknowledge Crime Wave, Blame Guns

24 Jan 2022

BUCK: Crime is still on the rise across the country, as you know, and this is very much like the way we’ve seen some of the libs figuring out all of a sudden, “Wait. Wait a minute. You mean that all the stuff we’ve been told by Fauci when it comes to covid and stopping the spread, and ‘We don’t know how to stop this virus’…?” Think of how many times they’ve said that, and they say it without irony now. I mean, they’re laughable.

These people are out of their minds. They do not know how to stop this aerosolized virus. We’ve never been able to just stop an aerosolized virus of the level of contagiousness that we’re talking about with covid, right? This is absurd. This is absurd. And yet here we are, once again, with crime. All of a sudden, Democrats are finding out, “Wait. You mean if we don’t arrest people who break the law — if we let them get away with stuff, if we let them out of prison early or don’t even have them serve any jail time before they go before a judge — not only do they feel like the system is soft.

“They will exploit more and they will act in a more criminal and predatory fashion against their fellow human beings, but you’re gonna see this happening all across the country. You’re gonna see a whole crime wave. In fact, some of them will even engage in crimes while they would have been held in jail but they’re out on bail because of no-cash bail rules.” We see this all over the place, and over the weekend there were some horrific incidents.

I believe there’s a cop who was shot in Washington, D.C., and two NYPD officers — one killed serving his city and another one grievously wounded. There was a domestic dispute call, and some career criminal who should have been in prison came out and, yes, he had an illegal firearm — and, yes, he had an illegal ammunition drum that he had put on. It’s already illegal, and he shot two cops.

And people are starting to say, “What the heck is going on? What’s it gonna take to get things under control?” Governor Kathy Hochul — who I really do think is one of the least capable and dumbest governors in America — is saying that it’s the gun, Clay. She actually gave a speech over the weekend where she said, “A gun killed…” They separated out the human agency from this entirely. It’s the inanimate object’s fault. It was an illegal gun that shot these people, these two cops, not a career criminal. Her she is saying they’re gonna stop the guns.

HOCHUL: We have to do more to fight the scourge of illegal guns on our streets —

CROWD: (smattering of applause)

HOCHUL: — and we need Washington teaming up with us, teaming up with locals to get it done. Guns, despite our tough laws in the state of New York — and we’re proud of them — they’re coming in from other states. They’re flooding our streets. And I have pledged the resources of the New York State police to become embedded with NYPD and others to help them. In fact, we’ve actually tripled funding for the gun-interdiction effort because they’re coming in from Virginia and Maryland — and coming in from Pennsylvania — to our very streets and we have to do whatever we can to protect our neighborhoods.

BUCK: How about locking up criminals, Clay?

CLAY: That would be one solution. This reminds me of when the car that was driven by that murdering —

BUCK: In Waukesha.

CLAY: — guy in Waukesha. Yeah. When they said, “A car mowed down six people,” and you’re like, “You know, I don’t think the car was driving without somebody behind the wheel.” Remember those headlines in CNN and Washington Post, “SUV Mows Through Parade.” Really? Was it the car or was it a murdering, racist rampager in Waukesha that did this? It wasn’t the gun. It was the idiot murderer who pulled the trigger of the gun.

And, by the way, to your point on Kathy Hochul and what an embarrassment she is, she’s definitely dumber than Andrew Cuomo. Whatever you might think about Andrew Cuomo, I don’t think he’s an imbecile. I think he’s one of the worst governors in the (chuckles) history of America, but he’s not an imbecile. I think Kathy Hochul might actually be an imbecile.

Did you see, Buck, she also compared making kids wear masks to making them wear shoes? We need to get the audio of that because I listened to it and my jaw dropped over how stupid it was. She said her daughter used to hate to wear shoes but then she got used to it, and that’s really what students are gonna have to do with masks too.

BUCK: I want to understand: They have normalized and politicians have mandated child abuse. This is child abuse. This is wrong what they are doing to people. They are actual — and I think at some level some of them may be aware in the back of their minds this is deeply embarrassing for them if they ever move into a normal society again, if we ever move back to a normal place where we can have honest conversations about how stupid all this is.

One of the reasons — and I feel like this gets lost in this, Clay. One of the reasons why you and I have known masks don’t work, it’s not just a function of doing a spray bottle test. It is in actual real-world trials. Does anybody think that a child in a classroom is maintaining the seal that would be necessary for any actual reduction? Otherwise you’re just breathing in the same wear as everybody else without any filtration! Does anyone think kids are maintaining that? Only a moron would believe that, but this is where we are.

CLAY: Even if you don’t think about it from a kid perspective, just think about it on an airplane. When you’re taking off your mask to eat or drink, it’s obvious that it’s not going to work. And, Buck, to your point on the child abuse, I think that’s an angle that we need to talk about more. I’m sure you saw the viral video of the kid having his masked taped to his face by a teacher.

Just take a step back and pretend that you had been asleep Rip van Winkle style since February of 2020, and you suddenly woke up and you saw videos and people were applauding a teacher using tape, affixing a mask to a child’s face and that that teacher thought they were the good person. You would just… Your mind would be blown. And I think to your point, Buck, a lot of these steps get taken, and you sometimes in the end in a thoroughly ridiculous place where you can’t even go back and retrace your steps to how you got there.

It’s why I always say, it’s like golf if you golf at all. One bad shot often leads to multiple other bad shots if you don’t acknowledge that you just hit a bad shot. What we’ve done in the United States is hit, like, 24 consecutive bad shots in a row. And you’re now so far removed from the initial bad shot that you’re not even cognizant of how you got into the position that you did.

And, Buck, you said earlier in this hour, and I think it’s a hundred percent right, masking is so important because it was one of the initial bad shots by our nation, and they are fighting so hard to avoid having to acknowledge that masking was wrong because if they acknowledge that, then people start to ask… It’s like you’re peeling the onion back pulling the thread. People start to ask questions about so many other choices as well.

BUCK: This is one of the — as I was telling you, ’cause, you know, I rock out. I know how to party. Was reading about pre-Soviet revolutionary era Russia, which also ties in, if you want to know more about some of the thinking that even goes to today with Russia and Ukraine which we’ll talk about Russia, Ukraine a little bit next hour. But, Clay, the whole premise was the people in the Soviet Union… This isn’t the pre-revolutionary period.

But in the Soviet Union it became, “We know they’re lying. They know that we know that they’re lying. Everybody knows that everybody’s lying.” But the whole point is you have to go along with the lies, and that then a destroys everybody’s ability to not only politically organized but it destroys sense of belief in self and your own consciousness and your understanding of the world around you. When you have to celebrate lies that everyone knows are lies, it disorients you and makes you very easy to control as well.

Fauci said masks don’t work. Never forget it, okay? This guy was in public health for 50 years, and his first reaction was, that’s stupid; it’s laughable. Within a month it’s, “Oh, my gosh. You don’t mask you’re a monster, you want old people to die.” No studies. No change whatsoever. That’s all you actually have to know that that was the initial moment. By the way, I’ve had a lot of people write, say like I’m an anti-mask fundamentalist.

They think that I almost focused on it too much and I keep trying to tell them this is the foundational lie of Fauciism. This is the basis of all of it. This is when it was up is down and down is up. You know, this is the sky is green, this is some other universe we’re living it — and the moment you get people to go along with one lie that they know is a lie, it becomes easier to make them go along with everything else. And it’s also why all Big Tech and all these other people they recognize that if you break that initial moment of control, that collapse in what we know to be true, the rest of it all starts to fall apart too.

CLAY: It’s the red pill.

BUCK: It is. It’s the red pill.

CLAY: It’s a perfect metaphor.

BUCK: That’s right.

CLAY: Once you start to recognize how much around you is false and built on lies, you see it everywhere just like taking the red pill in The Matrix.

Recent Stories