×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Sen. Paul Talks to Us About the Interview YouTube Banned

25 Jan 2022

CLAY: We’re joined by Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky. Senator, appreciate you joining us. Were you surprised to hear that YouTube would not allow us to post our interview with you? Because that to me is next-level crazy. You’re a sitting senator, you’re a doctor, you came on our show — biggest radio show in the country — to share your opinions as an elected official. And YouTube won’t allow us to distribute that conversation.

SEN. PAUL: Well, YouTube has a history of censorship, and people should quit using them. People should go as far as they can. They should support competitors like rumble.com. They should go to my website, Liberty.com. They should listen to your radio program. But we need to quit using these people. We need to quit given them content — and you’re right. If conservatives left YouTube completely, it will dwindle. Same with Twitter.

These people, if they’re going to censor us, we should leave them. I looked back at the interview, and the only thing I can see is that one of the things we discussed was whether or not adolescent males have an increased risk of myocarditis. Without question it’s true. There’s now a preview article out and it’s a reconstruction of an article that was in Nature earlier this year, and they stratified it by age.

And without question — with a lot of subjects — it’s an increased risk over the risk of disease. Now, the CDC’s been trying to say something else. They’ve been trying to say, “Oh, well, covid can cause myocarditis too.” Well, when you stratify it by age, without question all of the studies showed that adolescent males are increased risk. And this is a big deal because the risk for adolescent males increases the more vaccines you get.

So we’ve got University of Chicago, Princeton, Yale, all these schools mandating a booster for adolescent males. They are setting themselves up for a lawsuit, and I hope some young family with a boy that gets sick from this — I hope they don’t get sick, but if they do — I hope they own up owning Yale or Harvard or University of Chicago because this is crazy that we are mandating young boys to take a vaccine that has more danger than the disease has.

BUCK: Senator Paul, it’s Buck. Thanks, as always, for being with us. I do think that the YouTube policy is still officially — and we had this sent to us by our digital team — that you cannot question the effectiveness of masks, that that is not allowed by YouTube’s stated guidelines —

SEN. PAUL: (laughing)

BUCK: — and that they will shut things down as a result of this. How are we supposed to make sense of it when we have not only you and others who are medical doctors and policy experts who are weighing in on this one, but even some who had been big mask proponents in the past — whether we’re talking about Scott Gottlieb or Leana Wen, both doctors — they’ve been willing to say masks don’t work. So it feels like we’re in a very Orwellian world where some people can say that masks don’t work or don’t work well, but others, like you, can’t.

SEN. PAUL: This is the foolhardy nature of sort of censorship. Is YouTube now gonna censor the CDC? I mean, the CDC has admitted that the cloth masks are ineffective. I believe that’s from the CDC website now. So, is YouTube gonna edit the CDC as well? No. I mean, realize who these bumbling idiots are that are doing the censorship. Sometimes they’re like grad students from France or something. I mean, it’s people who have no concept of what the real scientific matter is at hand.

And it’s actually fairly simple that the randomized controlled studies on cloth masks show they don’t work. There was a large study in Denmark. This was also one in Vietnam. The one in Vietnam showed that no mask was actually safer than a cloth mask. There are no good studies, randomized, controlled studies showing cloth masks work. And yet for a year — and even now — we’ve got these idiots down in Virginia, the educators in — I guess you can call ’em that, the school folks — down in Virginia mandating you wear a cloth mask that doesn’t work. So, I mean, that’s just insane, and we have to push back and if we don’t push back there will be no freedom left for us by the time these people are done with us.

BUCK: Just one note on that, Senator Paul. Our understanding is that governor Youngkin has come in and said you don’t have to wear masks, and at least — and this was just breaking yesterday — in Loudoun County, Virginia, the school district is saying, “No, kids have to wear masks anyway.” They’re enforcing a mask mandate in contravention of the actual governor’s authority. It feels like, you know, when the lockdowners and the Fauciites have the political power, they wield it — and when they don’t, they just ignore those who do.

SEN. PAUL: Well, the irony is the court’s looking at this and many of the courts have looked at it and say, “Oh, well, governors have unlimited power to enforce or take away your freedoms in the furtherance of public health.” Well, do they also have the right to give you your freedom back? (chuckles) Can governors only have emergency powers to take away your freedom and no power to actually give you your freedom back when the science says that actually there isn’t any improvement of public health by wearing a mask?

So, you know, we’ll see what happens. I think in the court, my understanding… I just saw an interview with the attorney general from Virginia, and he was saying that basically the powers exist there and that he thinks the governor will win in court. But, in the meantime, you have these people who are basically left-wing, woke individuals who are pushing an agenda on our children. They’re gonna keep defying the governor and spend taxpayer money going to court to try to force your kid to wear a mask. Parents have to push back. Take your kids out of these schools, go somewhere else, teach ’em at home, but do not let these people have your kids.

CLAY: Senator Paul, I think this is significant, and I would imagine that you would not… Some people are gonna disagree with this show, with your opinions, with our opinions. We wouldn’t be saying to YouTube, “Hey, you shouldn’t be able to host those opinions.” Right? We have a marketplace of ideas. People should be able to hear all arguments. That’s the entire foundation of the First Amendment in this country. We believe the more people who talk, the better results we get.

Should there be… I understand the argument of, “Hey, we have to build a new Rumble. We have to build competitors in the tech space and take away YouTube’s power.” But should there be a governmental role in mandating some form of evenhanded treatment for political opinions regardless of what those opinions are when it comes to sites like YouTube, in your mind?

SEN. PAUL: I don’t think so. I think the only thing worse than YouTube censoring you would be the government getting involved in trying to figure out what’s fair. I do think that when you look at all of these things, the difference between the liberty argument or the individualism argument versus collectivism is that as an individualist, I have an opinion on wearing masks. I’m gonna give it to you and you can take it or leave it.

The problem with collectivism is they have an opinion also, and we can both support our arguments, but their opinion is going to be mandated on us. So it’s really the difference between coercion and liberty, and people have to really understand this. In a free society we can all get along so much better. Because like that crazy woman who got out of her van that’s all over the internet yelling and screaming about people getting vaccinated? That doesn’t happen under liberty. You can try to persuade people, but yelling and screaming at ’em isn’t it. But we really have to oppose people who believe that they to want make their opinion into a mandate.

BUCK: Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, sir, appreciate you being with us. Thanks so much.

SEN. PAUL: Thank you.

CLAY: Amen on that, by the way, too, Buck.

BUCK: Absolutely.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

C&B Tutorial on Ukraine: What’s Putin’s Plan?

25 Jan 2022

BUCK: We want to talk to you about borders here for a moment. We could start with our own border and then we’ll discuss what’s going on far, far away — a border that’s getting all the attention certainly in the media and all over the world right now, at least the Western world and its media. I want to start with ours, though, because while the Biden regime is very focused in on the situation in Ukraine — and you’re gonna see a lot more talk about what’s happening there, and there could be an invasion any day by Russia. What will the scope and scale of that invasion be?

Who knows? We’re still trying to figure all this out. But just so you know about our own border, southern border, the first three months of fiscal year ’22 there have been over a half million encounters at the southern border. That means, essentially, they’ve had either an arrest to make of someone crossing illegally or a got-away, someone coming into the country they know is illegal and then who makes a run for it. That is more than double the first three months of fiscal year 2021 and the same period of time.

CBP released its December border numbers: 178,840 encounters in December. So, getting close to 200K for the month. That is an increase over November. It is definitely a lot higher than the 73,000 encounters in December of 2020. So in December, the last month we had data from the Customs and Border Patrol, 178,000 encounters. Our border’s basically open. So let’s just talk about that for a second here because there’s no interest from the Democrat Party in doing anything about this, other than keeping it going.

They actually think that this is of benefit to them. So now let’s… I just wanted to put that out there for the context here of the enormous focus that’s now going to be spent across the apparatus of our government and the media-industrial complex for Ukraine, which — for those who like these bits of trivia — actually means “borderlands” in Slavic, in the Slavic language. That’s where the name comes from.

Ukraine has been on the borderland of what was the Russian Empire (or the Russian Federation now) for a very long time. It’s been thought of that way. The very name itself means “border,” essentially — and, Clay, now we’re being told that we have to be ready for a major crisis. Why are these crises happening under the Biden administration? Here is the deputy national security adviser saying, “You know, man, the fact that it’s all happening when Biden’s in office, it’s just all a coincidence.”

JON FINER: I know there’s a lot of temptation to connect these issues, uh, ’cause these events are taking place simultaneously. The North Korea challenge has been with us for quite some time, really going back years, uh, and — and actually decades. The United States has been very clear that it considers North Korea’s missile tests to be provocative, to be a threat to peace and stability. We have taken action with regard to sanctions just in recent days and weeks. (sputters) We’ve taken action at the Security Council, and we will continue to provide all manner of reassurance to our Asian allies, uh, in particular, uh, the South Koreans and the Japanese, uh, with regard to these tests. But I don’t see these — these issues as connected in any way other than that they took place, you know, taking place around same time.

BUCK: It’s just a coincidence, Clay. You’ve got Afghanistan debacle, China getting more aggressive, North Korea getting aggressive, Russia making moves — it’s all a coincidence under Biden.

CLAY: Yeah. They clearly don’t have any respect for Biden, and this is why — even if you are very anti-Joe Biden, as virtually everybody listening right now is — you don’t want him to be a complete, pathetic nincompoop, which is where he is right now, because our adversaries will take advantage of his weakness. And in addition to the loss of life — which was indefensible — that happened in Afghanistan, the message that that sent was, “Our foreign policy is weak, ineffective, inconsistent, and there is no recent to trust what the Americans say.”

Now the same thing might be playing out in Ukraine — and again, it directly implicates what might happen in China as it pertains to Taiwan, not to mention what Iran is gonna think about the nuclear agreement that is going on there, what North Korea is going to be believe going forward as they try to draw more attention to themselves. It’s as if many people have just stopped paying attention to North Korea over the past couple of years.

And, Buck, the United States, through Jen Psaki, just said that they believe a Ukraine overall attack is imminent, okay? An invasion is imminent. So the question that I have here is, “What is Putin waiting for? What is his…?” So we know that likely the United States response is going to be ineffectual and not particularly able to mobilize a large contingent of Europe to agree. That’s one of the challenges here.

What do you think…? Let’s flip the script, because clearly the United States is mostly responding to what Russia is doing in terms of they’re not leading this interaction in any way. What’s Putin’s time frame here? Why is he got a hundred thousand troops mobilized? What could he be waiting for? What is his “go” moment, for lack of another phrase, given the fact that the United States has been characterizing a Russia invasion of Ukraine as imminent for some time now?

BUCK: So, there’s two basic models of what they think this is going to kick off with, and depending on who you ask — and analysts come at this from different perspectives and we’re gonna find out soon who’s right. There’s the more established Russian protocol of what they call “maskirovka,” which is warfare by deception, essentially, meaning, “Oh, we’re not invading. We’re just going to help provide security at this one location where there’s been a disturbance involving some Russian nationals — Russian speakers, rather — who feel like they need greater protection.” To anyone listening to this you start rolling your eyes you’re like, “Come on. Doesn’t…”

CLAY: Justifies the action.

BUCK: It’s pretextual. So the pretextual essentially invasion by stealth, which they’ve already been doing, if you have to remember. This is essentially an escalation of that which has already been underway in Donbass. There is trench warfare going on in Donbass — has been for five, six years now. They already seized Crimea with a referendum. Maybe they’re gonna concoct some kind of storyline that requires some degree of — I say “requires” in quotes — military action to provide, Clay, greater stability and security in some region of eastern or Northeastern Ukraine.

That’s one possibility. The other is all-out blitzkrieg. Get it done. Go for it. Go big Putin style. And people are saying that is also a possibility here. That would clearly be an effort, I think, to get rid of the existing regime, install a pro-Russian government. I don’t think they’re looking really for a full-on occupation. And this is another part where a lot of analysts are already disagreeing. They just want to make sure that there is a greater…

Let’s be honest. They want a Russian puppet. They want essentially what they have in Belarus, where they have somebody who effectively takes orders from Putin, although it’s technically another country. They want that in Ukraine. They don’t want any tilt toward NATO. They don’t want any tilt toward Europe. So it might be relatively short if they go even with that big blitzkrieg, because the part of it that will get hard for them…

I don’t think anyone thinks that the Russians going in with heavy tanks and all the air power and the close air support they can bring would be something that Ukraine can really fight against. But we know from Afghanistan, from Iraq, from other places you’re gonna occupy a place that doesn’t want to be occupied, Russians aren’t gonna be able to handle that very well at all. So they need it to either be limited and controlled — or quick, a blitzkrieg strike, topple the government — throw in some puppet, essentially. I think these are the options that are on display right now. And, by the way, nobody knows except Putin — and Putin may still be deciding what he wants to do.

CLAY: And the other thing — and you kind of hinted at it — is how sustained and also in the moment is Ukrainian resistance likely to be, by which I mean how much actual fighting would occur if Russia decides to invade Ukraine? They may well get run over, but is this a situation like what we saw happen in Iraq when overwhelming majority of the United States forces swept in and most Iraqi soldiers just said, “Yeah, we’ve got no real interest in tangling with the American forces,” or are there elements of the Ukrainian military that are willing to be dug in and really kind of battle it out, and how does that change the calculus of what might take place here?”

BUCK: I think the belief is that — and, again, you have to rely on some degree… I hate consensus in foreign policy ’cause foreign policy consensus is usually wrong. But right now most people seem to be, you know, people watching from this country who follow Ukraine and Eurasia closely, that the Ukrainians will fight, and that they’re fight pretty hard in the early stages if it’s within their capability to do so. They do not have the armor and the air support, though — if this becomes a full-scale invasion — to do all that much.

It’s really in the occupation and insurgency phase where you’d see it, ’cause they’ve mobilized a lot of essentially their version of a kind of National Guard. They’ve mobilized people who have limited training. But if you want to fight for your homeland, you don’t need a lot training if you’ve got an AK-47 and a couple RPGs and you know the terrain and you know who’s who, to cause a whole lot of problems for people. So will it go into that phase and would they even want that? Here, for example, is Boris Johnson the — at least for now still — prime minister in the U.K. saying that this could be like Chechnya.

JOHNSON: Invading Ukraine, from a Russian perspective, is going to be a painful, violent, and bloody business. And I think it’s very important that people in Russia understand that this could be a new Chechnya.

BUCK: So they went into Chechnya in 1999, the Russians did, and it got very nasty. Now, Chechnya was a hotbed of Islamic radicalism, in fact at different times was even considered as a primary front for Al-Qaeda back in the day with old school Al-Qaeda. When he’s bringing that up, the Russians had a pretext to clear out militants in a small Caucasus country and they went in and it was ugly.

There were actually two Chechen wars, by the way. There have been two major military incursions into Chechnya by the Russians. I don’t think that they want that in Ukraine. And keep in mind, Chechnya is a tiny place with a small population compared to what you have if you’re gonna go into Ukraine with about 40 million people, I believe. Whole different ball game.

CLAY: I’ll tell you what, Buck. It’s kind of nice when all we had to worry about was mean tweets. I mean, for all of the… We’ll talk about this more. We got a loaded show for you, by the way. Alex Berenson in the third hour. Gordon Chang also hanging out with us. But remember when that was all the focus every day, every morning? Trump would send out a tweet, people would be all up in arms about it. I don’t remember there being a lot of fears of invasion and geopolitical tensions.

While they might have been trumped up in many ways — no pun intended there — they were nothing like what we’re dealing with right now, and that doesn’t even consider inflation, the border, the stock market’s down 500 points today and was yo-yo totally yesterday, everything associated with murder rate skyrocketing in the country. The Bidas touch really does destroy everything that it touches. It is remarkable to consider how much worse things are right now than they were in February of ’20, after three years of Trump presidency.

BUCK: You know how, Clay, in high school sometimes they’re just quick review, class, before we all go. Quick review, everybody. Biden is in obvious cognitive decline. He has never been an impressive leader. He has very little in accomplishments to actually show for over 40 years in, quote, “public life,” and ran highly unsuccessfully for president three times before this, and even Democrats laughed at him. This is what you get when you make that person president. That is my quick review for the class.

CLAY: It’s unfortunate on a seismic level.

Recent Stories

Spotify Don’t Need Neil Young Around Anyhow

25 Jan 2022

CLAY: Neil Young. Not a big fan of Spotify, by the way. Did you see this story? Has insisted that his music be removed from Spotify as long as Joe Rogan’s podcast is up. If you were Spotify’s CEO, what would your response be to Neil Young, Buck?

BUCK: This is a pretty funny one. It’s always a bad thing in any media entertainment business to wildly publicly overestimate your value. They paid a hundred million dollars for Joe Rogan at Spotify. I’m pretty sure they could live without the Neil Young catalog. I’m just gonna say this. No disrespect to Neil Young fans out there.

CLAY: You’re gonna be disrespectful to Neil Young fans, by the way. When you say no disrespect, immediately this is going to be disrespectful.

BUCK: I do like to pick fights with Bruce Springsteen fans ’cause we have a lot of listeners in New Jersey, and I love my New Jersey brothers and sisters, but I like to pick fights with them over Springsteen. But I sit here, I can’t even… I don’t even know enough about Neil Young’s catalog to make fun of him. I think I know more about Kenny G’s catalog of songs than Neil Young at this point.

CLAY: You know what’s funny — and I’m not a music guy, right, like, in terms of being super knowledgeable. But any first thought of Neil Young is isn’t Sweet Home Alabama, don’t they say, “I hope Neil Young will remember…”? And I don’t even think that was the same Neil Young. I think that was like the governor of Alabama at the time.

BUCK: That would be sad, like, if there was a great — ’cause Sweet Home Alabama is one of the great all time American rock songs. Imagine if there was, like, a Clay Travis reference that wasn’t to you. Be like, there’s another —

CLAY: That’s a different Neil Young. I don’t even know that Neil Young sings that I would know.

BUCK: Oh, he’s saying it’s the same. The guys in here… You know, we got the team in here. They say, yes, that it’s the same Neil Young. That makes more sense.

CLAY: Okay. So it is the same Neil Young. Then that’s the only time I even think about Neil Young. So as long as they leave Sweet Home Alabama there, I don’t even care. Neil Young’s most famous part of his musical career may be the shout-out that he gets on the Sweet Home Alabama song.

BUCK: Isn’t it amazing to watch? At a broader level, you have these different — whether it’s musicians, actors, who you think of them, because we grew up and certainly the generation before us, Clay, grew up… Are you technically…? I’m technically a Millennial. What’s up. You’re technically Gen Y?

CLAY: I’m the old… No. I’m the oldest member of Generation X.

BUCK: Oh, Generation X.

CLAY: I think Millennial began in 1980, I think.

BUCK: Yes. That’s right.

CLAY: I was born in 1979. So I missed it by like eight months. So we’re technically members of different generations.

BUCK: Right. But so, the generation that came before both of us, they thought of artists, musicians in particular as counterculture. Think of Jimi Hendrix, revolution, all this stuff.

CLAY: Just Woodstock in general.

BUCK: Yeah. Now they’re all The Man. Even Howard Stern has turned into The Man. I mean, he’s not a musician, but we see what’s going on. They’re supporting the biggest control gap of human beings in the United States in living memory, and they’re a part of the machinery. It’s amazing. Neil Young is The Man.

CLAY: Well, think about this too. College kids today, some of them are demanding that their freedoms be more regulated. For anybody out there who was a Baby Boomer, for anybody who remembers the Vietnam protests, they’re right now are the safest generation of people that has ever existed in the history of the United States, right? If you’re 18 years old and you’re in college right now, hopefully some of you are listening to us, you have never been under less physical danger in the entire history of the United States, right?

Your physical danger is lower. Yet they feel so on overwhelmingly fearful that they are demanding that schools take away their freedoms, Buck. They’re basically protesting to be regulated more. It’s wild to think about. And I hope that at some point there are going to be some of these kids that are brave enough to step back and say, “Wait. It’s not rebellious to be on the side of everyone in positions of power. That’s the opposite of rebellion.”

Recent Stories

Berenson: Vax Makes You MORE SUSCEPTIBLE to Omicron

25 Jan 2022

CLAY: We are joined now by another man who has dealt with the ridiculous spice — I don’t know if that’s the right word — of cancellation, our guy, Alex Berenson. Alex, you saw what happened with us with YouTube. I bet this will also get flagged by YouTube because we are now all enemies of the state.

BERENSON: (laughing)

CLAY: How dare we! But I want to start — first of all, thanks for joining us — with this headline that just came out. The Wall Street Journal just put out a headline saying — and I’m reading directly from this headline — “Covid-19 Deaths Top 2,100 a Day, Highest in Nearly a Year.” How is that possible?

BERENSON: How is that possible? Well, there’s a ton of Omicron around, and some of those deaths are gonna be sort of coincidental. There’s also some Delta left over, by the way, although not very much. But there are people who’ve been lagging in the hospitals who died. So there’s some of that. So some of those deaths are gonna be just essentially incidental deaths, are gonna be deaths with covid — and I do believe that Omicron is less dangerous than Delta.

There’s evidence of that. But when you have a million new infections a day or more — and we likely have a lot more than that, given that given that the posted number of 700,000 and a lot of people weren’t getting tested — people are gonna die. People are gonna die even if this is less dangerous — and it’s interesting. Like, months ago I was saying to you we’re not through with this. All these people who said, “Oh it’s gonna be over by the winter.” I mean, these people who believed in efficacy of the vaccines have been calling for the end of this for a year, and they’ve been completely wrong.

And they’re more wrong now relatively because the vaccines don’t work at all against Omicron, and so it’s out there, and it’s killing people. And not just in the United States. I mean, this lie that this is somehow — that the United States is — exceptional in this way is a lie. All over Europe people are dying from Omicron, even though those are incredibly highly vaccinated countries because the vaccine doesn’t work very well against Omicron.

BUCK: So Alex we have from your Substack and everyone should check out Alex’s book, Pandemia, which has been selling very well despite all the pressure on people, of course, to not support Alex’s work, which we recommend you do support it. Go get Pandemia. Alex, you put out on your Substack: “An urgent warning. The world’s most mRNA vaccinated countries now have shockingly high covid infection rates. Hospitalizations and deaths are rising fast too. The mRNA experiment needs to stop immediately.” Expand.

BERENSON: Okay. So we talked last month, right, in December, about Omicron, and it looked like Omicron’s very mild, right, based on the data out of South Africa. But South Africa isn’t very heavily vaccinated, and something disturbing that should really concern us all is happening in these countries that have really high vaccination rates. There’s a lot of them. There’s Denmark, there’s Australia, there’s Israel especially — especially, notably — where basically the entire adult population has received two doses, and most people have received three.

As I say on the Substack, the infectious rates in Israel are unimaginably high right now. More people were infected with covid in the last week in Israel than in the entire basically first year of the epidemic, in all of 2020, before the vaccinations. It looks very much like vaccines have negative efficacy against Omicron. Now, what that means is people who’ve been vaccinated with two doses are more likely to be infected with it.

BUCK: How could that be possible, Alex? Can you explain that? We’re saying in the theoretical. How could that be the case?

BERENSON: Sure. It’s entirely biologically plausible. The reason it’s plausible is that the spike on Omicron is different than the spike on the original covid, the original SARS-CoV-2. And the vaccines were optimized to help your body produce antibodies to the spike of the original SARS-CoV-2. So what you have after being vaccinated is a mix of antibodies that don’t exactly fit the original, or that don’t exactly fit the spike — Omicron spike — as well. Okay?

So that can mean two things. The less dangerous version of this is it just sort of hinders your overall response, and so you’re producing antibodies and some of them work against the spike and some of them don’t. But the mix is not as optimal as it would be if you were just naturally infected and had no vaccination. Okay. So it takes your body longer, so you’re more likely to get infected, but ultimately you’re gonna clear it. The worst version of this is what’s called antibody-dependent enhancement.

And that means that the antibodies your body is producing actually hook onto the spike in a way that helps the spike evade your cell, okay? That is the true terror. That would mean that you’re more likely not to get sick, but to get sicker if you’ve been vaccinated. And we know this can happen with vaccines because it has happened with other vaccines in the past. Most notably, a vaccine about Dengue Fever and also many years ago a vaccine for a virus that kids get a lot called RSV.

So this can happen. What we don’t know and what I make clear in my Substack post which came out yesterday — which a lot of people have been asking about — is we don’t know yet that overall incidence of severe disease is worse in vaccinated people for Omicron. It’s very complicated epidemiologically because so many people are getting it, and it’s hard to sort out who’s winding up in the hospital incidentally, who’s actually getting sick from the disease, and then it takes awhile for people to die.

So it’s complicated. But I would say at this point — I will go on the record saying it — it is abundantly clear that being vaccinated increases your risk of being infected with Omicron. And I think everybody knows this (laughs) because everybody knows a ton of people who’ve been vaccinated — and, in some cases, boosted — and have gotten this in the last month! We all know this.

CLAY: All right. First of all, this is crazy, and obviously we’ve been talking about this for months, and you’ve been ahead of where the data is going to lead us. And you’ve also said, Alex, that trying to predict covid has made fools of us at all at some point or another.

BERENSON: Yeah.

CLAY: So, I’m asking you for a difficult scenario here. But as we come up on the end of January, what we saw last year was an overall decline, substantially, of covid as we moved into the summer before Delta came up and before Omicron came up.

BERENSON: Yeah.

CLAY: What do you foresee the next couple of months looking like based on the data from Europe and Israel and what you are seeing around the world in the United States as it pertains to covid? Are we going to see a similar decline as we move into spring and summer as naturally occurs with these viruses? What does the next couple of months look like in your mind?

BERENSON: I really do not know. The reason I don’t know anymore, is that it’s also not clear whether being vaccinated is gonna hinder the development of natural immunity post-infection, okay? So if you’re infected and you haven’t been vaccinated, you develop a broad range of antibodies. Not just to the spike, but to other parts of the coronavirus. It is not clear that people who are vaccinated and then infected and then recover get the same broad protection, and so (laughing) — and there’s something else.

There’s another subvariant of Omicron out there. This has not really been well understood in the U.S., but it’s clear in Europe. I am hearing… Okay, I don’t know that this is true, and we need to get data on this, that people who have been infected with Omicron and recovered are in some cases getting reinfected very quickly, possibly with the other subvariant of Omicron. If that’s true, then (laughing) this thing is just gonna go around and around and around.

And I don’t know what stops it because seasonality didn’t stop it in Australia. In Australia, it’s summer there right now. They shouldn’t have any cases. They had a tremendous number of cases last week; then it came down. In Denmark and Israel and France, the caseloads are off the charts right now. And again, it doesn’t seem like it’s as dangerous overall, but they’re still seeing a lot of hospitalizations and deaths just because the number of cases is so high.

So I don’t really want to project what the next few months are gonna look like. What I said — and this is the most important part of this — is this experiment has to stop. It has to stop now! These vaccines have failed. They have failed, okay? Look at the case numbers in the highly vaccinated countries. They have failed, and we need to stop vaccinating and boosting, and we need to figure out what we’re gonna do next, because —

CLAY: Alex, sorry to cut you off there, but when Joe Biden keeps saying, “We have a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” is he totally clueless? It’s clearly a lie at this point.

BERENSON: Yeah.

CLAY: What is going on with that messaging at this point in your mind?

BERENSON: I don’t… I don’t know. I don’t actually care about the politics right now, because this is more important than the politics, because what’s clear is in the very short term, after you get through with the two doses, you’re temporarily protected. And then after you boost, you’re temporarily protected again. But it’s like a boomerang, okay? The protection goes away, and now it’s worse than just going away, it’s clearly wrong-footing people in terms of their immune system, in terms of the new variant.

And fortunately, overall Omicron seems less dangerous. But if another variant rolls around in the spring that’s more dangerous and people are wrong-footed, it will be catastrophic. And I don’t know — and this is a question for virologists and immunologists — how long will it take to undo this or even if it’s even possible to undo it, okay? But what I know is we need to stop making the same mistake. We need to stop giving people mRNA for a spike that doesn’t even exist anymore. We have to stop.

BUCK: Alex, are you…? When you run this by, as I’m sure you do, some of the epidemiologists and particularly worthwhile MDs, people that work in this area and have real expertise, are they…? I mean, I’ve never heard you sound this level of concerned before about what you are finding out based on the data. Are some others sharing this with you? Is this growing…?

BERENSON: (interruption)

BUCK: Go ahead.

BERENSON: People are just shaking their heads! They just don’t understand. So the Israelis said, “We’re not gonna boost anymore,” a week ago, and then this morning they said they’re going to, or at least that they’re gonna offer to. I’m talking about a second booster. Okay? Everyone in Israel has already gotten a booster, and again, they have the worst infection rates any country has ever seen this week, and now they think… I mean, I don’t know what the…

Again, I don’t know what the politics are. If the politics are, “We’re just gonna kick this down the road another three months and hope that Pfizer gives us an Omicron-specific vaccine by the spring,” but you know what? By the spring there will probably be another variant. So, when I talk with people who understand this and are looking at data, they are just shaking their heads. And they know that the CDC is lying when it says that these vaccines offer really good protection against severe disease and death.

They know it’s an artifact, and I’ll keep saying this and explaining this to people. You can’t compare vaccinated and unvaccinated populations in countries where a lot of people are vaccinated because the only elderly people or a lot of elderly people who are not vaccinated are not being vaccinated, not ’cause they’re Trump voters, certainly not in a country like Denmark or Israel. They’re just too old and sick to be vaccinated. So then they get covid; they’re at high risk of death.

That’s when you see these gaps. You have to look at the overall population total. And when you do, again, you see off-the-charts levels of infections. And in a country like Denmark they’re now seeing a lot of hospitalizations in the vaccinated population. So again, when I talk to people who understand this — and believe me, there are people out there who understand this and are helping me understand it — none of us can figure out why push for another booster at this point? It doesn’t make any sense.

CLAY: Or kids, which is even scarier, right, Alex?

BERENSON: Right!

CLAY: Now there’s a lot of people saying, “Hey, a 5-year-old needs to get vaccinated.”

BERENSON: Right, and maybe, Clay, the politics are just gonna try to blame the unvaccinated. Maybe that’s the only Democratic strategy left, just like I’m gonna say that the voting… You know, if you vote not to have 24/7 election booths for six months before an election, you’re Bull Connor. Maybe I’m just gonna play the base, blame the unvaccinated. I don’t know what the politics are, but I know that medically and scientifically anybody looking at the data, these vaccines should be pulled from the market worldwide on the basis of efficacy. Forget side-effects. Just look at the efficacy. They’re not working right now.

BUCK: Alex, how do we get the final data necessary to make this point that you’re talking about here that they don’t work as well, even against… The last holdout here has been against hospitalization and death. Why don’t we have that data right now? Why don’t we know whether it works against hospitalization and death in the U.S.?

BERENSON: Because the CDC is not releasing the raw numbers! You can get raw numbers from the U.K. You can get raw numbers from Israel. They won’t release the numbers. They’ll only release the adjusted-rate ratios which they claim make the vaccines show that the vaccines work. And again, I want to be clear: If you look back last year, there was evidence that they reduced infection for a matter of months, and they reduced severe disease and death.

Because if you stop people from getting infected, it’s definitely gonna stop them from getting severe disease and death. That’s… But this idea that there’s this huge protection against severe disease and death but no protection against infections, look, you can spin a case for why that might be. But it doesn’t that I can ma much sent biologically especially because the main impact is on antibodies, not on T-cells, which is whole different conversation.

CLAY: Can you come back? I want to ask you a couple more questions, Alex. Do you have a couple more minutes?

BERENSON: Sure. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

BUCK: We’ll get to it. Alex Berenson will be with us.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: Alex Berenson, we got a quick segment here. I want to hit you with two quick questions, give you a chance to respond. Alex, based on your last segment I don’t know if you’ve watched Don’t Look Up, the Netflix show about an asteroid coming to earth, I feel like even though that’s a climate change allegory, that you are like the scientist here telling people, “Hey, these vaccines don’t work,” do you feel like that? Second part of this: Covid Zero is still the policy in China. Wouldn’t that theoretically make China maybe the most vulnerable country in the entire world to covid?

BERENSON: So it’s funny, right, ’cause Don’t Look Up, those are all Hollywood lefties. They hate me.

CLAY: Yes.

BERENSON: They try to get me banned from Twitter. They’d ban me from my Substack if they could. It’s ironic that they’re the ones completely ignoring this. There’s something about the word “vaccine,” as I wrote in Pandemia, that has this magic has this magic effect on people where they don’t look at the data. If this had been called a drug — and it obviously works more like a drug, it has a limited duration of effect, and then you have to get treated again — it couldn’t possibly pass FDA muster.

So I don’t understand. Again, I try not to think that much, and I certainly try not to head down these conspiracy ratholes about Bill Gates or whatever. I don’t understand what’s happening. I think that there’s some… It takes a little while in some cases to process the data. I think there’s hope that these vaccines had worked better than they have. But once you see the Israeli…

You know, once you see that the most vaccinated, boosted country in the world had 1% of its population infected with Omicron in a single day, what do I have to do? What do I have to do? What does anybody have to do? The data is on the Substack and you can go and get it on the Israeli site. So I don’t know what’s going on. As for China, no one knows what to make of what’s happening in China. All we know they have no covid, and they have no mRNA vaccine.

CLAY: Alex Berenson, phenomenal stuff. I mean phenomenal.

Recent Stories

Rice University Coach Criticizes NCAA on Transgender Situation

25 Jan 2022

CLAY: So you’ve talked about this. I’ve talked about this. A lot of people who are sports fans and don’t consume a place like OutKick or pay attention to stories like these, may not know this happens because ESPN basically hasn’t covered this story, nor have any of the other major sports outlets. But you have a University of Pennsylvania men’s swimmer who for three years was on the men’s team that decides to become a woman, flips over and becomes a woman and now is potentially going to set — in March — all-time records for women.

This is a biological man swimming as a woman. And a lot of people have been afraid to speak out and have any opinion about this, even though virtually everyone who cares about sports at all wants best man or best woman wins, and we know that if women’s sports were going head-to-head against men’s sports, men would win everything because men are bigger, stronger, and faster than women.

By the way, doesn’t mean that some women are not bigger, stronger, and faster than men. Just means that the elite, high-level athletic competition, men are always going to dominate women in every single athletic category. Well, this is crazy because people have not been willing to speak out because they’re afraid of condemnation or being accused of being anti-transgender, and this is the power of far-left-wing sports ideology that now suffuses all of society, is people are afraid to say what are self-evident truths.

Finally, we have got a men’s swim team coach who spoke out and said this is wrong. I want to give him credit here. Rice University, their swim coach, Seth Huston, openly spoke out about this and said in an interview with Swimswam.com — which is a swimming website — he thinks, quote, it’s “black and white right now, you compete as what you were biologically born until we get to the point where we’ve expanded opportunities, you know for instance, in transgender.”

And so credit to him for actually being willing to speak out. He said because the NCAA rules are not adjusting, “The NCAA once again has proven that it is not leading. It is not really even following. The NCAA governance has become a bystander waiting for other organizations to make tough decisions.” They are frustrated with the lack of NCAA leadership.

He says [I] “respect” this swimmer, “all of that. … I am completely okay with … the opportunity to compete. … Whether that is creating a third division, a transgender division, or whatever. So, those quotes, I mean, Buck, it speaks to how crazy the world we live in is, that this is the first coach that has been willing to publicly say this is wrong because they’re all so terrified of being targeted.

BUCK: Yep. Speaking the truth — the most obvious truth — is a revolutionary act these days, as the saying goes. And it is just keeps getting more absurd. And they’re gonna keep pushing, ’cause they don’t care. The same way that they keep pushing on other things when it comes to covid, they’re gonna keep pushing to the trans agenda because it’s about power, friends.

Recent Stories

Crazy Fauciites Inexplicably Ratchet Up on Masks in School

25 Jan 2022

FAUCI: Obviously it’s very stressful on my family, my wife and my children to continue attacks and the ad hominems that are related to nothing but pushing back on the public health principles that I talk about. But this is too important. This is the kind of thing that I’ve devoted my entire career, but certainly over the last 40-plus years in public health, science, and medicine, and we are in a crisis right now, and there’s no chance I’m gonna walk away from this. This is something that’s too important.

BUCK: “I am too important!” Fauci wants you to know. Welcome back to the Clay and Buck show. You know, he’s never gonna go away willingly until it’s all over or Republicans are in charge and he’ll have to answer hard questions, doesn’t want to and people are gonna start to say. Hold on a second. Was any of this worth it that you made us go through? Were any of the mandates? Remember, the shots came to us through Operation Warp Speed. There’s no argument that, “Oh, we shouldn’t…”

“No one should have taken the shots, or the shots aren’t helpful for some people in some ways.” That’s not the argument. The argument is should you have made people go through lockdowns, social distancing, Lysol on groceries, masking up, double masking, N95 masking, school closures? Did any of that do anything, is where we are. You know how Clay and I feel about this. But as people get clarity on this, I think they’re gonna realize, what the heck is going on?

What has happened to us here? And so that’s one note I just wanted to put out there. Then, Clay, you’re seeing a lot of focus right now on masks in schools. I know we talk about masks here a lot, and it’s because I believe it is a foundational sacrament to Fauciism, and also the first time Clay and I ever talk to each other on radio was over the issue of what’s with these stupid masks? They’re not gonna do anything. That was like March of 2020, maybe April of 2020.

Here we are, though, now where there are some school districts just in New York, the Supreme Court — not the court of appeals, which is higher, but the Supreme Court of the State of New York — has said that the governor, Hochul, who is an imbecile, does not have the authority to make everybody in schools mask up. So a judge has already ruled that they’re exceeding their authority there. In Virginia the governor, Youngkin, has decided that you don’t have to wear a mask.

Same thing, by the way, in Florida. They can’t make your child wear a mask. Here is — just to give you a sense of what a religious belief this has become, this is the kind of people they put on TV — NYU epidemiologist, Dr. Gounder, says it’s good that L.A. schools are requiring surgical-style masks now an enhancement — Clay, no more Biden, Kamala, balaclava, to wear or buff those gators, whatever they call those things — even outdoors.

REPORTER: Starting today in Los Angeles County schools, they’re going to now prohibit students know students from wearing cloth masks. Students must wear well-fitted non-cloth masks with a nose wired at all times including outdoors. Is that a step that more schools should be taken or is that unnecessary right now?

GOUNDER: We as human beings, we need to learn to adopt so that we will survive covid. And that does mean, for example, (sputters) upping our mask game using higher quality masks. And we know that surgical masks do protect even better than cloth masks. So this is a very reasonable move the LA schools are making right now.

BUCK: It is insane, Clay. This woman is appalling.

CLAY: Imagine… Go back in time. Imagine if instead of arguing in favor of masks, which make no sense — and clearly our buddy @ianmsc… I don’t know if you just saw this, Buck, during the course of our show. He has a new graphic showing the rates of covid infection for states with mask mandates and states without mask mandates. And the states without mask mandates actually have a lower rate of covid than the places with mask mandates right now.

So the data doesn’t reflect that masks work at all. And it never has. And if it did, you would see, obviously, an incredibly divergent path there as opposed to the numbers almost always staying pretty similar. But imagine if our national health experts in March of 2020, Buck, had come out and said — instead of don’t leave your homes, lock down beaches, lock down kids’ playgrounds, lock down gyms, you can’t even go to a movie theater.

Imagine if they had come out and said, “Hey, covid is here. The data — which we already knew — reflects that the elderly and the obese are under the most danger. So what we would suggest is a national exercise plan. We want everyone out there to become hyperaware of what you’re eating and counting calories and exercising in an effort to get yourself healthier because covid is going to be an ever-present threat.

“But the best thing that you can do is not socially distance, it’s not to wear a mask, it’s to get yourself into better physical shape so you are better prepared to fight off illness, whether it’s covid or something else.” Imagine how much more healthy the United States would be right now, Buck, if all of the time that we have spent expending on vaccine mandates and on mask mandates instead we had made an incredible effort to get people to exercise?

BUCK: You’re also seeing something — I mean, yes. All of that is true, right?

CLAY: All of that is true.

BUCK: Telling an 85-year-old with four comorbidities to drop 40 pounds and get into great shape, nonetheless… But I see what you’re saying, and I agree. I mean, there could have been a much bigger focus on overall health all along here, especially when people have all this time from work from home — and, oh, no, they shut down the gyms or they make you wear a mask in a gym which is completely absurd.

CLAY: Shut down parks. You couldn’t even go on a hike.

BUCK: I have friends who were screamed at by people outdoors, nowhere near them for not wearing a mask outside. They are afraid that the virus, like a heat-seeking missile fired from a Mig fighter jet or something was going to hit them 50 feet away. These people are completely —

CLAY: Like people who jog in masks outdoors. What are these people thinking?

BUCK: That was the norm in New York for a long time. Folks, these people are nuts. This is what you have to understand. You’re not dealing with rationality anymore. You’re dealing with what is essentially a state-enforced cult with a massive Democrat Party/media apparatus pushing this on everybody, and it knows that if it stops pushing it then all of a sudden there can be problems for their power. So they don’t know. They’ve got the tiger by the tail, so to speak.

They don’t want this to end. Jen Psaki was asked by Peter Doocy… High five! Peter’s… You can’t pay for all the good publicity he’s getting the last 24 hours. He’s a good guy asking questions. You and I both like Peter. But good for him, man. He should be doing backflips with all the craziness the libs are throwing at him. Here’s Jen Psaki telling Peter Doocy that it’s not parents who should make decisions about children’s health. It’s public health officials.

DOOCY: On schools in Virginia, seven districts are saying 350,000 students are suing the state; they’re hoping to get a strict mask mandate for students that has been rolled back by the new governor reinstated. So who does the president think knows best for students, school board members or parents?

PSAKI: Well, the president believes that public health officials have the best guidance on what we can all do to protect ourselves, including teachers, administrators, and students.

BUCK: She’s in an indefensible position all the time, and so she says indefensible things to defend what’s indefensible. But, Clay, what public health officials? Where are they on this one? Show us the data.

BUCK: There isn’t anything to support it. It’s the emperor that wears no clothes. And that’s why — you know, I went on Hannity on Friday, and I’ve said it on this show, too — I’m not going to get my kids the vaccine and my kids are not going to go to school and wear masks. The kids in my life like the kids in everybody out there listening’s lives whether you’re a parent or grandparent, that is the most important thing you recognize in your life.

But what we trust parents to do is analyze risk for their children. That’s really probably the single most important job of a parent since your goal is to get your kids into healthy adulthood. You heard Rand Paul earlier on the show. I’ve got a kid turning 14 this week. He’s gonna be a ninth grader this year. He’s an eighth grader now. He’s a teenager going through puberty.

The myocarditis risk to him, Buck, is more substantial than the covid risk to him based on the data. He’s probably already had covid, ’cause I’ve had it twice. My wife’s had it. We haven’t ever… He’s never had any symptoms, but it would totally make sense that he would have had it too. He doesn’t need the vaccine. And most kids out there don’t have any need whatsoever for any kind of covid vaccine or covid shot, whatever you want to call it.

BUCK: What you’re seeing is the tyranny of bureaucracy where people are saying, “You have to do something,” not because they think you have to do it, but because someone else — who is never responsive to you, never accountable to you — is telling someone else to make you do something. This is why this never gets fixed. This is why we’re never able to shout at these commie lunatics and get them to see the light. But we’re not gonna stop.

Recent Stories

China Is Watching What We Do in Ukraine

25 Jan 2022

BUCK: Here, we’ve got 8,500 U.S. units placed on heightened preparedness — we mentioned this yesterday — and what’s the possibility of not just a war in Ukraine, but what’s the U.S. response gonna be in this Biden administration.

JOHN KIRBY: …try to provide some facts on these preparations that will reinforce our commitment to NATO and to the NATO response force and increase our readiness. Secretary Austin has placed a range of units in the United States on a heightened preparedness to deploy, which increases our readiness to provide forces if NATO should activate the NRF or if other situations develop. All told, the number of forces that the secretary has placed on heightened alert, uhhh, comes up to about 8500 personnel.

BUCK: Now, Clay, this is a volatile situation in Ukraine. We’ll talk more about it over the course of the show today. But when you look at the Biden team, the people that he has, and of course Joe Biden himself as commander-in-chief, I think a big part of the concern… It’s really twofold. On the one hand, there’s, “I don’t think these people are competent,” and I don’t think that they have a record, even the people they think in the Democrat foreign policy establishment are bright. I mean, look at Libya, look at all the disasters in the recent past. But beyond that, I think they also aren’t trusted right now because getting us more involved, whatever that means, than we need to be in Ukraine is a way for them to not have people focused on the disasters that are occurring in this country right now on a policy level.

CLAY: I think so, and we talked about this some yesterday. I don’t think you can underrate what China is taking from our response to Russia potentially invading Ukraine, because China — and I’m gonna keep hammering this ’cause I think it’s so absurd. We’re going over to China — we and the rest of the world — and effectively bending the knee and showing up in Beijing for the Olympics. And I wonder, based on the close relationships between Putin and Xi right now — at least what seems to be — between China and Russia, whether there’s conversations about, “Hey, are you gonna invade Ukraine before the Olympics so that it overshadows everything surrounding the Olympics?”

But also, Buck — and I think this is maybe the most significant part, China knows we did nothing when they effectively took over Hong Kong and ended democracy there. They threw all the reporters in jail. All these people who claimed to care about the First Amendment basically did nothing. Now they’re going to watch what we do with Ukraine, and they’re going to say, “If the United States is allowing Russia to take Ukraine, they’re gonna talk a big game about us taking Taiwan, but if we do it, they will do nothing.”

And then the question becomes: How much of what’s going on in Ukraine and in Taiwan represents the full nature of this expansionist ideal from Russia and China and/or are there other places that they would like to go grab to further illuminate their cultural hegemony — there’s another word for you, Buck, for the SAT — and where does that go? And that to me is the biggest question.

Recent Stories

EIB 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Show Prep

25 Jan 2022

  • OutKick: Rice Swim Coach Speaks Out Against Transgender Lia Thomas Situation
  • Wall Street Journal: Covid-19 Deaths Top 2,100 a Day, Highest in Nearly a Year. Omicron, though milder for some patients, is spreading with record-breaking speed
  • AlexBerenson.substack: An Urgent Warning
  • BizPacReview: ‘Doocy broke Joe:’ Biden, media hypocrites buried in backlash over hot mic Doocy dig, pathetic ‘apology’
  • Daily Wire: Biden Faces Backlash Over Profane Outburst At Reporter Concerned About Inflation: ‘Loving The Return To Civility’
  • New York Post: Biden approval rating tanks to new low: poll
  • Daily Caller: Could This Anthony Fauci Conspiracy Theory Actually Be Real? Just Look At The Dates
  • HotAir: Florida clashes with Biden FDA after agency de-authorizes two monoclonal antibody drugs
  • PJ Media: Bodies Are Stacking Up as Progressive Politicians Blame Everything but Themselves
  • Breitbart: Israeli Expert Panel Supports 4th Vaccine Dose for All Adults
  • Bloomberg: S&P 500 Tumbles in Worst-Ever Start Through 16 Days
  • The Hill: The Armageddon elections to come
  • DNYUZ: A Grim January Leaves Some New Yorkers Fearful for the City’s Future
  • Bloomberg: Bars and gyms are bustling as Americans learn to live with COVID
  • UK Daily Mail: Denmark, New Zealand and Finland top list of least corrupt nations while South Sudan is the worst and US drops out of top 25 amid ‘continuous attacks on free and fair elections’

  • Stars and Stripes: Putin discusses ‘strategic partnership’ with Cuban leader amid fears of military threat
  • CBS: Man Can’t Get Heart Transplant Because He’s Not Vaccinated Against COVID
  • Axios: Scoop: Republicans probe NBC over Beijing Olympics coverage
  • Reuters: Olympics-At Beijing Games, hugs discouraged but condoms available
  • Daily Wire: Republicans Demand Afghanistan Hearing Be Public: ‘The World Is Now A More Dangerous Place’
  • Daily Wire: Education Department Tells All NY Parents That Kids Have To Mask Despite Supreme Court Ruling It Illegal
  • HotAir: Ninth Circuit judge rebukes court: I’ll write your en-banc bad take on the Second Amendment for you
  • Breitbart: Kamala Harris Warns Vladimir Putin of ‘Serious Consequences’ if He Invades Ukraine
  • BizPacReview: School boards sue to keep masks on kids after Republican Governor makes it optional
  • Daily Wire: Youngkin Sets Up Tip Line For Parents To Report Teachers Using ‘Divisive’ Practices
  • Gateway Pundit: 178,840 Illegals Captured and Released at Border in December — Nearly 2 Million Invaders This Year — But Biden Regime Worried about Ukraine’s Border!

  • Recent Stories

    Clay Backs Aaron Rodgers Comments on Biden

    25 Jan 2022

    Clay applauded Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers — who declined to get vaccinated even after the president angrily demanded he do so — for striking back at Joe Biden’s false claims that this is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” Biden had mocked the private citizen previously, but like a few other high-profile athletes, Rodgers wouldn’t back down.

    Recent Stories

    YouTube Bans C&B for Interviewing a U.S. Senator

    24 Jan 2022

    CLAY: Our interview with Rand Paul — a sitting United States senator, who is a medical doctor — is not allowed to be posted on YouTube because they say it is misinformation. And I’m trying to wrack my brain. I don’t remember Rand Paul saying anything remotely controversial. But think about where we are right now, that one of 100 United States senators… How many United States senators are doctors, Buck? Four or five, probably, at most? And a doctor is not allowed on one of the most — if not the most — popular radio shows? I think we’re the most popular listened to radio show in the country. Our interview with him is not allowed to be shared?

    BUCK: But it goes to show you the extreme ideas that the left is openly now instituting about censorship. It used to be, “Oh, we all agree it’s wrong or we all agree it’s harmful.” Now it’s, if it is a 50-50 split in America today on an issue, the 50% get kicked off of the most powerful media platforms in the country, and they’re okay with that. They think that actually makes sense. About issues of public policy, things that affect literally every single one of us. These are totalitarian nutsos running these places.

    CLAY: It’s the fundamental antithesis of a democracy to not allow people to hear what elected officials think about major public policy issues.

    BREAK TRANSCRIPT

    CLAY: We are enemies of the state here, at least the state of YouTube. (chuckles) Our interview with Rand Paul, Doctor Senator Rand Paul — I think this is gonna get a lot of play, Buck, throughout the course of… ’cause, I mean, look. You might hate us, us. Believe it or not — my mom finds it hard to believe — there are people who hate you and there are people who hate me. Clearly, they have awful taste. But there are people out there.

    Even if you hate us, we are in the media business. We conduct interviews on a regular basis with a lot of people who are democratically elected in this country. The entire basis of the marketplace of ideas is predicated on the idea that you should be able to hear the opinions of your elected officials and make decisions about whether to support them or not based on what they believe about public policy issues of the day.

    YouTube is more powerful right now than CBS or NBC or Fox or ABC ever were as broadcast networks. My kids, Buck, they wake up; they don’t even watch television. They wake up every day and they watch YouTube. Now, they’re not watching interviews that you and I would be doing, but they’re watching Minecraft videos. They’re watching their favorite YouTube personalities.

    The idea that YouTube is going to determine what a doctor and a senator is allowed to say on the largest radio show in the country and whether people are able to hear it or not is fundamentally anti-American. It is communistic in nature. It is anti the marketplace of ideas, and it’s a tremendous embarrassment, in my opinion, to YouTube.

    BUCK: They couldn’t even defend it. Could you imagine if they tried to put forward some person from the world of YouTube communications and public relations and try to defend it.

    CLAY: They’re welcome on here.

    BUCK: Yeah. I would love to have somebody from YouTube come on and try to explain why Scott Gottlieb can say on CBS, “Masks don’t work,” and CBS doesn’t get dinged for that. But we have Dr. Rand Paul/Senator Rand Paul on this show, and of course he’s shut down. We know it’s just tribalism at this point. It’s obvious. The shock to the First Amendment, the sneak attack, really, against the First Amendment that occurred when they booted Donald Trump — a sitting president — off social media platforms? Folks, what else do you have to know? That was the nuclear option, in essence. That is exactly what we’ve been worried about.

    CLAY: Senator Rand Paul has retweeted, if you want to hear that interview. Maybe you missed it. Maybe you just want to hear it now ’cause you’re fired up about the fact that YouTube pulled it. You can go Rumble and that video is up. You can go to my Twitter handle @ClayTravis. That video is up. You can go to Senator Rand Paul’s Twitter account. He has retweeted it.

    I would encourage all of you to check it out. These are the kind of people, by the way, we’re dealing with that are insanely stupid. I wanted to hit this audio ’cause I mentioned it. The new New York governor, Kathy Hochul, was trying to defend masks, and she said that it reminded her about having to put sneakers on her kids’ feet in order to go to kindergarten and they’ll just get over it. Listen to Kathy Hochul defending masks by comparing them to tennis shoes.

    HOCHUL: I’ll say one thing about the kids. My daughter had a meltdown over having to put sneakers on to go to kindergarten. She got used wearing sneakers in school. They just… (sputtering) They adapt better than adults do, and I really proud of the parents who made sure that their kids understood this is for their safety and got it done. But we’re looking forward to the day we can lift the school as well as the, uh, business requirements. I truly am. That will be very fabulous day. It means that we turned the corner in a way that we feel we’re not gonna be sliding backwards anytime soon.

    BUCK: There’s no turning the corner. She’s out of her mind. She’s actually an idiot. I’m sorry She’s actually stupid.

    CLAY: Tennis shoes are not similar to masks, all right! It’s not a similar analogy! I’m so sick of hearing idiots out there saying, “Well, kids adapt better than adults do. ” No. Kids are just used to having to do what adults tell them to do. The psychological scarring… you’re seeing the stories out now, Buck, about kids. When you were a kid, you had speech issues.

    Learning how to see others speak… They’re now saying, the CDC is, “Hey, for young kids who are learning to read or learning a new language or might have speech issues, they need to be wearing masks that are clear so they can see the lips and enunciation that is occurring.” This… I am so angry about this. We have taken from young children so much of their lives for no benefit over this masking and remote schooling BS.

    And this is one of the times that I wish we didn’t have restrictions on the language that we could use, ’cause there are a lot of choice words I would love to speckle in here and go full bore on how insanely infuriating this is to me when somebody as dumb as Governor Kathy Hochul of New York says, “Oh, kids get used to it. They adapt. It’s just like wearing shoes.” No, you imbecile, it is not.

    BUCK: It is not at all, and you remember last week we played that young British female pundit who broke down in tears talking about how they just canceled… In the U.K. it’s a different system, but the exams you take have huge implications for when you’re in high school for where you go within the university system and often very big implications for where you’re gonna go professionally.

    It’s a little different here and fewer and fewer people, by the way, are even choosing to go to college who could go to college these days. That’s a whole other conversation we could and should have. But she broke down in tears, Clay, because she’s like, “They’re ruining our lives for what?”

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: I’ve had covid twice, which is another way of saying, everything that I had to do, all this other crap was insane. It did nothing. It didn’t protect me. It didn’t change anything.

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: Every person listening to this who’s had covid once or twice has been through the same thing. This idea of masking and mitigation is only sensible if you’re talking about a finite period of time that this thing is going to go away.

    CLAY: And if it worked! (laughing)

    BUCK: And if it worked. It does neither of those things. It is not going away, and the mitigation measures do not work, and so we sit here and we say to ourselves, “What is it going to take for these people…?” I mean, Clay, they make kids eat their lunch outside in freezing weather! These people are abusing children in the name of science while then the teachers themselves and the teachers union officials go out and take selfies drinking margaritas in crowded restaurants. That happened in New York over the weekend, by the way.

    CLAY: Of course it did. We’ve kept bars open and shut down schools.

    BUCK: This is just disgusting, and Fauci is to blame along with all the others. They should all be fired. They should all be repudiated. And, yeah, I want more people to join the freedom revolution here in America.

    Recent Stories