×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Open Line Friday Caller Debunks Mask Myths

24 Sep 2021

CLAY: Let’s go to Dominic first up. Dominic, what you got for us?

CALLER: Okay. Subject: Masks. I worked in several operations in industry using filters to sterilize things. I would have to get things cleared through FDA. We would make sure that the filters would work. They were certified to work. They were tested, quality tested and so forth.

BUCK: But when you see people saying things like, “Mask up between bites,” do you also want to start throwing things at the wall or what?

I can tell you, considering the size of viruses, they are transmitted for covid through fine aerosols. The cloth masks, surgical masks do nothing. To get some level of effect, you have to go — and this in is the respirator category — to an N95. Even those are designed for dust. None of the things that people commonly buy are designed for viruses.

CLAY: So how frustrating is it to you, Dominic, as someone who has expertise in the mask industry, to be walking around and seeing everybody wearing these masks and hear all the debates about virtue signaling and everything else?

BUCK: Masks? What about the Kamala-Biden 2024 kerchiefs and things that people are putting on?

CLAY: Yeah, but it has to be insanely frustrating if you have actual knowledge of how flawed these are from working your job.

CALLER: Okay. It makes no sense. I’m surprised… I’ve actually gone to our local school board here, and I’ve challenged anybody I can talk to — I challenge them — specify a mask that works.

CLAY: Yeah.

CALLER: Now, anybody who’s used an N95 knows how uncomfortable they are. When I worked in a factory, I had mechanics working for me. If it was a dusty atmosphere, under OSHA regs, you had to wear an N95 mask. However, before you can wear that mask, you had to get an okay from a physician in case you had breathing difficulties.

Then you had to go through training. Then you would be fitted, ’cause these come in different facial sizes. You couldn’t have any facial hair. They have to seal up against your face. And I would not have them work, because I knew how uncomfortable they were — I would not have them work — any more than 20 or 25 minutes.

BUCK: Dominic, again, what you’re talking about here in a sense is the mechanics and aerodynamics, which falls under the category of science too, I think.

CALLER: Mmm-hmm.

BUCK: But when you see people saying things like, “Mask up between bites,” do you also want to start throwing things at the wall or what?

CALLER: It makes no sense to me, and here’s the thing that doesn’t make any sense, either. How many people really believe that masks work and, “Gee, yeah, I have these symptoms; maybe I have it! But because I’m vaccinated and I have a mask, it’s okay.” Maybe those are the people who are spreading. Who knows?

BUCK: These things they do where they have the spray bottles? Where did they come up with this? You know what I’m talking about. This is where they started to tell us early in the pandemic, they would have mannequins with liquid spray bottles and then they would look at the droplets that got through the spray. If somebody was spraying chlorine gas, I wouldn’t say, “Oh, well, some of it got stuck in the mask.”

CALLER: Droplets, yes. Okay? But all of the data that’s out, the studies have shown the virus is primarily transmitted as a fine aerosol.

BUCK: Right.

CALLER: So, as a fine aerosol, depending on whose definition you look at, generally that’s less than a half micron. So now —

BUCK: So, it gets right through the mesh. So the people in the beginning who were saying it’s like firing a hose through a chicken wire fence or something —

CALLER: Yeah. Yeah.

BUCK: That’s a rough analogy, but —

CALLER: — and the thing is, these aerosols are so small, you cannot see them generally. If there’s like sunlight in the background or whatever like dust you might see it, but generally you can’t see the stuff. As you speak or breathe, even. These droplets — which, again, they’re fine aerosols — start drying, and they become extremely small.

BUCK: That’s what I thought. Dominic, thanks so much. I appreciate it. #Science, Clay, #ClayAndBuck. Keeping it real.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Biden Hasn’t Had His Booster Yet

24 Sep 2021

BUCK: I’m surprised. I actually watched the press conference this morning but I was so focused in on Biden’s little speech on, one, that boosters now are pretty much gonna be open to whoever wants to get a booster. There’s official guidance, but, trust me: They’re not gonna be saying, “Oh, you’re not an essential worker. You’re a less-than-essential worker. You can’t get the shot or whatever.”

So people are gonna now… If you’re an adult who wants the booster, de facto you’ll be able to get one which is a big change from last week where they were saying, “Oh, no, we don’t think you need them. Hmm.” Then also, of course, the lie about the Border Patrol which was very frustrating for Biden to just say something. The photographers involved who took the photo said there was no whipping of migrants or “strapping,” as Biden said, but it turns out, Clay, that Biden said — he was asked — he hasn’t yet gotten his booster.

CLAY: A little bit surprising me.

BUCK: Yeah, we both thought he probably had. I’m a little surprised that he addressed this and answered this. Look, he will. Right? There’s no way they’re gonna have this and be presenting this without boosters in the mix for the president and for others.

CLAY: Do you think they would hide it if he got covid, if they could? Is there any doubt?

BUCK: I think they would. I really do. I think if he got really sick, they obviously couldn’t, but I do believe that if he had… Remember we’re told right now it’s not that the vaccine will keep you from getting covid. It’s that the vaccine will make you less likely to be hospitalized and substantially less likely to die if you get covid, right?

If he got a mild case of covid that was kind of like a sniffle and they tested and they found out, I think they would say, “Under private medical records or maybe it was an oversensitive…” They would find some way to avoid telling people that he had — and again, a mild covid case we’re talking about here but I think they wouldn’t tell people.

CLAY: Yeah, I think they would try to find a way to avoid telling the American public because it would be so disastrous for the overall vaccines in general. And, by the way, God forbid, he actually got ill, right? Like Trump was when Trump had to go to the hospital. If he got ill afterwards, I think it would be a big deal I think we got the cut now, right?

BUCK: It’s cut 22.

BIDEN: The message of the day is this. If you’ve got the Pfizer vaccine, you got the (sputtering) the Pfizer vaccine in January, February, or March of this year and you’re over 65 years of age, go get the booster. I’ll be gettin’ my booster shot on. I… (sputtering) It’s hard to acknowledge I’m over 65 but I’ll be gettin’ any booster shot. It’s a very… I tell you. But all kiddin’ aside, booster shot, I’m not sure exactly when I’m gonna do it. As soon as I can get it done.

BUCK: The worst Biden is Pseudo-folksy Biden, just to put that out there, the whole like, “Y’know, I’m just here. Y’know, I’m just… I’m droppin’ Gs off of words ’cause I’m with the folks riding the choo-choo train work every day with my lunch pail.” This whole Biden act, this is a fiction, Clay. That guy I think at one point when he was in the Senate, he was renting a $25,000-a-month house in McLean, Virginia.

He has a two other three million-dollar home in Delaware, has a beach house on the Delaware shore and now is probably worst 15 or $20 million but he’s “I gotta make sure I get the less expensive Wonder bread cuz I’m, y’know, watchin’ m’pennies.” It’s such crap. He’s such a phony. But also, he’s not vaxxed. He hasn’t gotten the booster yet.

CLAY: Yeah. Look, this is a playing-with-fire incident, particularly, Buck, if we go into the fall and winter and the number of overall covid infections grows. I hope it won’t, but if it follows the same trend line that we saw previously, then the numbers would explode starting in fall and the winter. So we’ll see whether that happens again.

Recent Stories

As Predicted on This Show, Boosters Are Back

24 Sep 2021

BUCK: Remember when last week the FDA panel of outside experts whatever…? These bureaucracies, it’s tough to keep up with all of it. What was it? By overwhelming majority, they said, “We don’t need boosters except for people who are at particular risk with compromised immune systems,” and this was my response to it. Remember this one?

BUCK ARCHIVE: I don’t think boosters are not happening. I think this is gonna be something like or similar to what we see with J&J. This is the temporary pause to create the illusion of reasonableness from the apparatus of control before they decide in a month, maybe 60 days, “Oh, just kidding. You actually are all going to need boosters!”

CLAY: Are you gonna get a booster?

BUCK: That was… No.

CLAY: You’re done?

BUCK: I’m done.

CLAY: You got your vaccine. You’re finished. You’re calling it quits.

BUCK: No. (laughing) Now, as it is, now that I have friends — can neither confirm nor deny, but friends — who have been very creative with their arts and crafts projects recently, no. Also, now we have the natural immunity data could not be… But if I hadn’t gotten sick and known that I had covid and have natural immunity, would I have gotten it? I spend a lot of time with my parents who are at high risk.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: I would have been persuadable on that. I’ll just be honest with you. I’m not sure, but I probably would have gotten it based just on that. But the natural immunity thing now just makes it so obvious that this is unscientific idiocy. And then on top of that, the mandates are just tyrannical insanity, and I just want to say on the booster shot thing, Clay, that was last week.

Now, the only thing I got wrong on that one was I thought it might take them a month to reverse it. It took one week and all the sudden they’re like, “Yeah, the CDC decided boosters.” Why have the outside panel come in and tell you, “You don’t need all these people to get boosters,” and then a week later say, “Ehh, who needs those guys? Boosters!”

CLAY: My theory is… I think you nailed that in a strong way. But my theory on it is, they don’t want to throw everything at covid right now because if they throw everything at covid, then there’s nothing else left to do.

BUCK: So I think that the —

CLAY: Incrementalism, right?

BUCK: The way that the incrementalism works… I see what you’re saying, and I agree with what you’re saying. But I think what they’re gonna do is, it’s gonna go from, “You can get it,” to when we get into the wintertime, “You should get it,” to January-February period when we have another big surge, “You must get it.” That’s what I see happening as the progression here.

CLAY: Here’s my other question on this, Buck. You know this better than I do. So, you have a vaccine passport to prove that you can get into a bar, restaurant in New York.

BUCK: Anybody in New York City wants to go into places in Manhattan you have to have either on your phone or a card.

CLAY: Except the subway.

BUCK: By the way, some places are really intense about it. They’ll look at your ID, they’ll line it up with your… They want to check the name because remember there are people who are actually terrified, and they think this is keeping them safe.

CLAY: So the question that I have for this is, are you also now gonna get new booster papers like for your vaccine passport to prove that you got the booster?

BUCK: Yes.

CLAY: In New York now as the booster becomes more of a reality — Buck’s pulling out his vaccine passport right now in the studio — is there a spot there for a booster where you can prove that you got your booster?

BUCK: So interesting you bring that up, Clay, because I didn’t want to do make sure that I was telling everybody the right thing. There are — magically — three extra slots on the vaccine CDC paperwork. Below the place before it says when you got your shot and what it was and a little signature or whatever, there are three slots.

Now, the second slot is for the second dose, which if you get the J&J, you didn’t need, they told you, but then there are two blanks below that. Why would there be two blanks below that unless they had a feeling months ago that they might actually have to get you to get more shots?

CLAY: Which is what I’m saying. The people who got the vaccine are gonna be looking down on the people who aren’t willing to go get their boosters, right?

BUCK: No boosters, dude. No booster. I’m holding the line against boosters. That’s it. We all have our breaking point. No booster. Not happening. They’re gonna have to go full Australia on me and like Flex Cuff me and spray mace in my eyes, because I’m not masked up and I’m not boostered?

CLAY: That’s what they’re… By the way, some people out there are like, “Well, that sounds like hyperbole.” That’s what they’re doing in Australia.

BUCK: Just so everyone knows, they’re deploying law enforcement in Australia that are using rubber bullets against people for protesting in open air against the lockdowns in Australia because you’re not allowed to protest during lockdowns. They’re shooting people with rubber bullets like they’re a public safety menace.

CLAY: They’re arresting moms with kids. Again, I really do believe that without Republican governors and without federalism in this country, we would have gone down the path of Australia ’cause I think that’s what Dr. Fauci would have turn this into.

Recent Stories

Rush Applauds Trump for Sticking It to CNN

24 Sep 2021

Be sure to listen daily to Rush’s Timeless Wisdom podcast here or on iHeartRadio. It’s absolutely essential information from America’s Forever Anchorman.

Recent Stories

EIB 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Stack of Stuff

24 Sep 2021

Recent Stories

Clay Visits Hannity to Discuss Dr. Fauci, Movie Star

24 Sep 2021

Clay dropped by Hannity to discuss Dr. Fauci, the movie star, with Sean and Kayleigh McEnany.

Watch It Here:

Recent Stories

In Response to Hoax Story, Biden Bans Horses on Border

23 Sep 2021

BUCK: We have a recent Jen Psaki addition here. We got a crisis. They don’t want to call it a crisis. They want to tell you there’s a plan. They won’t tell you what the plan actually is. Here is DHS Secretary Mayorkas, for example, telling us all that the results are starting to be showing up here.

MAYORKAS: I’ve been quite clear that we do have a plan to address, uh, migration at the southern border. We’re executing it. It takes time, and we’re starting to see the results. I’d be very pleased to meet with you, umm, and discuss with you some of the tools that we have employed, uh, to actually drive the results that we saw this past month and we expect to see in the oncoming months.

BUCK: Now, “the results” are, Clay, we have effectively an open border. We can all see it. We’re all aware of it. “The plan” is always kept very vague. Is the plan that you’re going to turn away everybody who enters the U.S. illegally and is trying to game the system?

Or is the plan to make sure people don’t understand — the American people don’t understand — the complexities and loopholes of this process that are so adeptly being exploited so that they don’t even know that thousands are coming into the country? We did get one piece of the plan, though.

Remember a couple of days ago, everybody, when there was the “They’re whipping Haitian migrants from horseback!” That’s what they were saying about the Border Patrol. The problem with it was that that was completely false. The facts are not in dispute about that. It was false. It did not happen. They were horse… I believe split reins is what they’re call culled. I don’t know much about riding on horseback, but they were reins.

Here is the latest from the White House.

PSAKI: One, we feel those images are horrible and horrific. There is an investigation that the president certainly supports overseen by the Department of Homeland Security which he has conveyed will happen quickly. I can also convey to you that the secretary also conveyed to civil rights leaders earlier this morning that we would no longer be using horses in Del Rio. So that is something, a policy change that has been made in response.


BUCK: No more horses, Clay! Get rid of the horses for the story that was a lie when they told it the first time. That’s the plan.

CLAY: They’ve been using horses… This is a perfect representation of what goes on with viral social media, often untrue but viral imagery, okay? Can be videos; can be imagery. This is rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Let’s be clear what’s going on here.

They’re doing an investigation into a photo of a Border Patrol official on a horse trying to restrain immigrants from illegally entering the country, and they still can’t tell us why 12,000 people ended up simultaneously somehow under a bridge in Del Rio, Texas. They are banning horses?

Buck, you’ve been down to the border. I’m not an expert on horses, certainly. But I would imagine the reason why we use horses in those scenarios is because it’s very hard to move around on your feet because the border terrain is so rough that you cannot drive, let’s say, a Polaris or some sort of vehicle along the border.

You want to have the height of the horse and that you want to have the ability to go across water, that you want to be able to move faster. The same reason that horses were pretty proper before we had cars is why we uses horses on the border!

So suddenly banning the use of horses at Del Rio, which is strange, is just going to make the Border Patrol’s job that much more difficult than it already was. It’s cosmetic theater. It’s rearranging the chairs on the Titanic after the iceberg’s already been hit.

BUCK: Clay, there’s a mounted unity they call it here in New York City with the NYPD, used for patrol — and usually they’ll bring it in particularly for crowd control — because there is an elevated sight line from it and also people tend to recognize them. The cop is more visible. I mean, there are reasons for having a mounted patrol in the city, although sometimes it can be a bit messy.

But, anyway, the idea that you would get rid of this, though, and you have Mayorkas saying the plan is being implemented and it is already showing up in ways that are important? We don’t know what that means. They won’t give us numbers. They’re hiding it from us. And then one concrete thing we see is adjusting the optics of how Border Patrol is doing their jobs, making it a little harder for them to do their jobs.

As you rightly point out, there’s a reason they’re using horses: The terrain and just the ability to maneuver more fully and to see better what’s going on. But they do this in response to a story that’s not even true. This reminds me of when the left, for example, will have one of their frequent hate crime hoaxes, whether it’s Jussie Smollett or any number right, the noose in the NASCAR door and all these things, the nooses in the push parks that it turned out to be put up there by —

CLAY: Exercise.

BUCK: — a young African-American the guy to do exercise with like he was essentially using them to do pull-ups and things. You have these stories that come out, and even when the story is fake, the approach of the left is, “Well, we’ve got people emotional right now; so let’s make sure that we cater to that emotion in some way and maybe even take a policy directive.”

They’re gonna get rid of horses because of a thing that didn’t actually happen. So what’s that all about? It’s distraction, it’s incompetence, and because they don’t have better things to say.

CLAY: And it’s also where social media leads us, and I think that’s the biggest and most important take-away that you can have here. Social media is about extinguishing individual anecdotal stories which often don’t underlie or address the larger issues at place. This is how we got to defund the police.

This is a part of the overall structure that we’re in the middle of right now, Buck. Video of George Floyd goes out. The response isn’t, “Okay, let’s address this one individual incident to the best of our legal ability.” It is, “This is representative of what happens to black people with police all over the country.”

No, it isn’t. The reason why this is such a big story is because it’s so rare. Outlier incidents — and the one at the border here with Del Rio is even crazier because, as you rightly point out, it isn’t even real, right? The allegations and the story and the way that it spread is not rooted in reality.

But we try and solve big issues by addressing viral moments, and oftentimes that leads us to a 29% overall murder increase. When you solve one small issue — and I’m putting “solve” in quotation marks — you create a bigger one. And this is also covid writ large, right? Buck? This is like masks. Masks don’t do anything.

We’re obsessed with fighting over masks, and they don’t have any actual, tangible impact. Social distancing. We’re seeing all of this cosmetic theater, what I would refer to as the syndrome of rearranging the chairs on the Titanic. Hey, the iceberg’s been hit.

We got a major issue we have to address here. Where you’re sitting on the deck of the Titanic ain’t gonna matter in the end, and that’s what’s going on at the border. That’s what’s going on with our country. It’s a systemic failure of being able to address issues.

BUCK: Remember, with the Titanic, though, analogy, you know, you and I see the rule of law and sovereignty and the border going down under the waves, so to speak. They view this as a giant pathway to more Democrat voters and power. So the problem of the border is actually not one of, “They’re not good at handling the problem,” so much as it is they have a very different view of what the outcome should be.

We’re there; they’re there. There’s a fire, and we’re saying, “Hey, guys, turn on the hose. Right? We all want this fire out.” And they’re saying, “No. I thought this house was kind of ugly. I think we let it burn to the ground.” It’s a very different approach to what’s actually going on. So we need to remember that, too.

CLAY: And, by the way, the media falls victim to it, right? ‘Cause that’s gonna end up being the story. Instead of all these migrants that are there and what’s gonna happen to them it’s, “Oh, are they still gonna let people be on horseback?”

BUCK: Horseback. Of course. It’s ’cause it’s easy. It’s easy virtue signaling for idiot blue check journos inside the Beltway.

Recent Stories

Defund the Police Movement Led to Record Increase in Murders

23 Sep 2021

CLAY: We begin with the tally from the defund-the-police argument, which I believe is the single dumbest political argument that has existed in my lifetime because we knew exactly what the cost was going to be, and still Democrats embraced it. I want to let you hear this data here, and then we’re gonna play you a montage of Democrats saying, “Hey, when we say, ‘defund the police,’ we mean it.”

“The United States in 2020 experienced…” I’m reading from the New York Times. “The United States in 2020 experienced the biggest rise in murder since the start of national recordkeeping in 1960, according to” the FBI. The rise in murder was 29% in 2020.

That’s the largest we have ever seen and over double the largest one-year rise we’ve ever seen before, which was a 12.7% increase in 1968. The data scheduled to be officially released in the near future here. But as we walk through all of this, I want to play for you Democrats arguing, “When we say, ‘defund the police,’ we mean defund them.” Now that we know the full tally of deaths that this argument has entailed.

VOICE: I am for defunding the police.

PRESSLEY: Yes, I support the defund movement!

OCASIO-CORTEZ: Why use the word “defund”? Why use the word “defund”? It’s like, this is the word that’s coming from the street! Many affluent suburbs — suburbs have essentially already begun pursuing a defunding of the police in that they fund schools.

OMAR: Not only do we need to disinvest the police, but we need to completely dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department! The Minneapolis Police Department is rotten to the roots!

LIGHTFOOT: “Defund the police” does not mean abolish the police. It means a dramatic reduction in the number of police in our poor communities. Police are terrorizing black and brown communities! Evidence is clear across the country.

BUCK: The idiotic theories of the left, Clay, come with consequences for people. And, tragically — and at some level ironically — the voices that you’re hearing here that are advocating for defunding, which they seem to mostly understand is the actual removal of funding for police.

But then sometimes it means having more social workers or whatever it may be, resulted in — as you pointed out, data that shows unequivocally — a biggest-in-60-years leap in the murder rate in this country which “disproportionately affects black and brown communities” in major cities, as we know.

So that moment of national panic that was kicked off, as we know, because of the incident with George Floyd where a police officer — who has been found guilty of murder and, as we know, and is looking likely to spend decades in prison. That then resulted in riots all across the country.

It resulted in politicians — including some Republicans, I might note — who all of a sudden were willing to throw police under the business for the actions of really one police officer. The end result was that a lot of people are dead who would not have been dead based on statistics otherwise. Not just a stupid idea. “Defund the police” is not just a dumb idea.

It was a lethal idea, a murderous idea in the sense that it left people to the whims of the criminals in their societies, in their communities, and law enforcement was abandoned, politically and, in in some cases financially. There was actual defunding, we should remind everybody. Austin, a hundred million dollars. New York pulled a billion dollars out of the NYPD budget.

CLAY: Minneapolis, tons.

BUCK: Minneapolis pulled money out of the budget. They actually did do this, and there have been increases in the major cities in particular in law enforcement retiring and just morale being very, very low. Clay, you defund police; you get more crime. You don’t let Border Patrol do their job, you get more illegal immigration. These are simple cause-and-effect situations, and we see the consequences of them. It’s disastrous for the country and for the Biden administration.

CLAY: I think if you look at that data, again, a 29% increase in overall murders, the biggest ever — over double the biggest ever — increase since the FBI started tracking this data back in 1960, there are thousands of people who are dead right now, Buck, that would otherwise have been alive if police had been able to do their job.

And what’s going to happen here is, first of all, you’re gonna see an immediate backpedaling — we’ve already seen this — from people claiming that they never wanted to defund the police, that they never wanted to restrict the amount of dollars that were allocated to police, that they never wanted to change police’s ability to do their job.

There’s gonna be a backpedaling from this. There’s gonna be an attempt to pretend this was not real. We’ve already seen it begin. Can’t allow it to happen. You need to hold politicians to the consequences of their words with these actions. And also we’re going to see, I believe, a swing back in the other direction. And we’re already starting to see it.

Remember, Buck, the culture was so anti-cops that they pulled COPS off of the television! They weren’t allowed on reality shows. They pulled COPS off TV because they decided it made cops look too positive in terms of their portrayal. They pulled the reality show COPS off of television because of the anti-police sentiment.

And we got tons of police officers who listen to us all over the country, and we don’t need you to tell us, but we’ve taken these calls to verify it. They’ve never been more disrespected in their entire career of law enforcement, and when you pull back… We knew! This is so frustrating about this. We knew the Ferguson Effect was real, and effectively what we did was put the Ferguson Effect in play in every place in the country in terms of police being able to do their job.

BUCK: We knew it was real because this wasn’t the first iteration of Black Lives Matter as a movement. BLM, as we all recall, started after Ferguson, Missouri, with Michael Brown during the Obama administration. There was that timeless moment where you had a CNN reporter standing in front of a conflagration — a building fully on fire — saying, “This was a mostly peaceful protest.”

I think we will never forget that image, because it was the most CNN moment I think I’ve ever seen in my life: Narrative over the blazing inferno in front of your very eyes. But, Clay, the same thing happened. That’s how Heather Mac Donald — and credit to her for coming up with the notion of or doing the research to prove the Ferguson Effect after the first time around.

It’s quite clear. When you tell cops, “Hey, if there’s an incident that’s caught on video where it looks like you’re being rough — maybe it doesn’t show what happened even leading up to that moment, maybe it’s an edited video — we will not have your back as a district attorney. We will not politically support law enforcement doing what it has to do to keep communities safe from criminals.”

When you do that, all the sudden that guy who is running away with a handbag down the alleyway, the cop says, “I’m not gonna chase him. What if I have to tackle him? What if it gets ugly? I’m gonna risk my pension? I’m gonna risk my freedom?” So cops say, “Fine. Unless we really have to step in, we’re not going to step in.”

And then you take San Francisco, where people take armloads of stolen goods in broad daylight walking out, and no one does anything. Then you have what we’ve had here in New York City, Clay, where people were shooting up heroin in broad daylight on Broadway, which I saw myself in 2020, I would note. And I think also all the stats have to be put in the context of 2020 was the year of the lockdown. There are months, there were months where there should have been far fewer murders and homicides.

CLAY: You’re right.

BUCK: And there were actually for a while. There was a big drop-off. But the summer… This is what’s so important, because they want to say, “Oh, it was the pandemic.”

CLAY: Yeah, caused by the pandemic.

BUCK: They want to say that. But actually, the spike in homicides got going in June of 2020! What was the inciting incident? What was the difference all of a sudden in June? The rises of the BLM movement. The virus was actually in recession in June. Things were opening up. We all remember that. So don’t let them get away with more lies.

I just would hope there’s accountability. I do think, Clay, with the 43% Biden support right now we see — which is really awful for a first-year presidency — the crime aspect of it… People have seen Democrats… Look, they’re just reckless on this issue. They will feed cops to the wolves to apiece the mob and the communities suffer as a result.

CLAY: And you’re right about what we’re going to see as this data gets more widely discussed — and I think people need to be prepared to push back against it — is we had a skyrocketing crime rate that really only happened in about six months of the year. Because due to the shutdowns in March and April and May, the first five months or so of the year the murder rate was not in any way poised to be up by historic margins.

In fact, it was right around average and then it took off with the BLM movement with the George Floyd. And, by the way, I think this ties in as well with the fundamental lie that is being told here where we got some videos that came out from inside of the Capitol on January 6th that they have been fighting to avoid the release of.

You talked about the “mostly peaceful protests” with the fires going in the background and how much of a direct lie that was by CNN. The idea that we saw months of rioting, looting, violence all over America connected to BLM protests against police, and there was virtually no condemnation of it whatsoever.

And then the one time, the one time when conservatives actually rioted — and, by the way, they deserve to be punished for it like everybody who was rioting for months all throughout this country. But the difference between the way the media has covered it… We got one person shot in January 6th. Meanwhile, we got a 29% increase, the largest on record in reported history by the FBI, and there was virtually no condemnation at all.

BUCK: Shot.

CLAY: In fact, we were told it was mostly peaceful. Ashli Babbitt was killed.

BUCK: A protester, unarmed protester, not somebody who was in law enforcement, as we know. And I still… I’ve talked to so many people about that use-of-force incident. I still think that basically the double standard is at play where because it’s a Trump supporter, they act like shooting a woman in the neck from 15 or 20 feet away when she’s at a door…

Anyway, I still think that that was excessive force, but I’ve written about excessive force in other incidents that people barely even know about in places where there are times when cops actually step out of line. But the BLM narrative is very specific what the facts of the case must be for everyone to get upset about it.

I’d also say on the January 6 thing by CNN standards… By CNN standards, ’cause there was a whole march and rally out there on the streets it nothing to do with the Capitol go there, by CNN standards, January 6 was a mostly peaceful protest.

CLAY: That’s accurate. That’s right.

BUCK: There was a riot, but it was mostly peaceful.

Recent Stories

JD Vance on the Reasons He’s Running for Senate

23 Sep 2021

BUCK: We do have, as promised, Mr. JD Vance with us now. He is the best-selling, ultramega best-selling author of the Hillbilly Elegy book and is running for Senate in the great state of Ohio. JD, thanks for being with us.

VANCE: Thanks for having me, guys. Good to see you.

BUCK: So I’ve been arguing for a while — and Clay’s right there with me from the very beginning of this — that freedom is under greater assault in this country right now than it has been in my lifetime. I think it’s worse than anything else that we have seen, because of the response to covid and the way that the government is overreaching all over the place. What do you think is the necessary…? What would be your prescription for how we start to effectively turn this thing around and get back to not a new normal, JD, but normal?

VANCE: Yeah. So, I think the only way to do it is to basically ignore and try to actively fight against the various orders that comes down. Look, there are red states that are trying to nullify various mandates that are coming down. I think there are gonna be business owners that just ignore the mandates. There are employees who are quitting en masse and I think putting real strain on some of our industries, especially the health care industry.

People push back against the idea that they’re being told what to put in their body with this vaccine. So I think the only real way to do it is to actually stop complying because the government is trying to enforce these things; of course they’re using private companies very often as sort of arms of the government.

But if these together are trying to enforce this on one in every 10,000 Americans, it’s gonna be a lot easier than if they have to do it in one in a hundred Americans. And I think to the extent that we can just ignore and fight against you these things through civil disobedience, that’s a probably the best way to get some of our fundamental rights right.

CLAY: JD, I appreciate you coming on with us. I loved your book Hillbilly Elegy. I’m curious. Now that you’re running for the Senate in Ohio, obviously you had a lot of fans in Hollywood, people who really enjoyed your book. Have they all kind of turned their back on you now that you’re running as a Republican in the Senate? Have you experienced any sort of freeze from that universe that otherwise had been really favorably disposed towards you?

VANCE: Yeah, most of them knew my politics. I’d say that the real freeze if there was any, was when the movie came out. I felt like there was this massive backlash from some of the Hollywood critic and elite set. So I think that most of the friends that I had in Hollywood I no longer have anyway.

But I’m sure that I’ll lose more more along the way. I joke with my wife sometimes that the moment when I know I’m about to win the Senate race is when Netflix actually deplatforms the movie.

BUCK: (laughing)

VANCE: So, hopefully that doesn’t actually happen, but we’ll see. Knock on wood.

CLAY: It’s funny you mention that because I could totally see it happening, and you can’t even come up with satire or hyperbole hardly now because you’ll be like, “Hey, this crazy thing could happen,” like they could pull the word “woman” out of an RBG quote —

BUCK: They just now are gonna do that.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: They’ve heard this idea, and they may go forward with this. By the way, we’re speaking to JD Vance, author of Hillbilly Elegy, running for the Senate of the United States in Ohio, the great state of Ohio for the United States Senate. JD, the border right now, Clay and I are talking about it a lot today.

It feels like we’re not even really have the national conversation that we should, at least in my mind, about this, because I don’t believe the Democrats actually want the laws at our southern border to be enforced. I think that’s as a party now where they are and there’s just a fundamental dishonesty at work here where they act like this is something they’re trying to solve by stopping the inflow of illegal crossings. I don’t believe they actually want to stop it. I want to know what you think.

VANCE: I think that’s right. My view is that they love this crisis. They know that it’s good for their donors, and they know that it’s good for their effort to fundamentally remake the composition of the United States of America, and so they’re not trying to stop this at all. One of the most shameful things I think you can do as a leader is to crap on the people who are enforcing your orders, who are doing the things that you tell them to do.

And the way that Biden, that Harris, that Psaki, all of the leaders of the Biden administration basically flipped on Border Patrol agents who are doing an impossible job — of course, because Biden invited these people in en masse — it’s just really disgusting. It’s one of more depressing things that I’ve seen.

You know, the other thing that really worries me about this is it shows how much… As much as we have rightfully and somewhat successfully pushed back against the power of the mainstream press, they ’til have a lot of influence over the conversation because I think that if our country was being honest with itself, we would recognize this is a large-scale invasion.

This will fundamentally transform the economy and culture of the United States. It will also lead to the worsening of the drug epidemic, which is a really big deal in the state of Ohio. It’s just one of many stories, and I think that really this should be the story because of the effect it will have on the kind of country that we’re gonna have.

CLAY: JD, your wife, I believe, is a former Supreme Court clerk of John Roberts, and one of the big discussion points of late has been the idea of expanding the Supreme Court. I know you also went to Yale Law School yourself. How serious of a concern do you think this is, and how important is it for members of the Senate — in which you’re hoping to one day being seated — to stand up against the idea of a Biden administration court packing?

VANCE: Well, it’s very important. It’s one of the reasons why I think we have to take back the Senate because right now the risk has sort of been delayed for at least I think the next 18 months. I don’t think they’re gonna make a real play to try to pack the Supreme Court again. But if they take back the Senate, they sure as hell will and that’s something we just can’t tolerate.

Look, the Democrats are completely shameless about the acquisition of power. And it’s one thing that, frankly, I think Republicans should learn a hard lesson from the past six months of Democrat governance is that when the Democrats get power, they try to fundamentally remake the institutions and the structure of our government.

Republicans, when we win, we try to pass a good law or two. The Democrats are just playing a totally different game. I think we have to wake up to that fact. To your point, if you fundamentally transform the Supreme Court, it’s gonna be hard to get much of anything done.

You fundamentally transform the Supreme Court, then you fundamentally transform the nature of our elections, then you transform the composition of the country who’s voting in those elections, and then you have permanent Democratic rule for the rest of our lives.

BUCK: JD, what do you think the next moves are from the Biden administration? One thing that we’ve been discussing here pretty regularly, it’s obvious. You look at the numbers; you see what the approval ratings have been. You see the multiple crises, whether the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, what’s happening right now at the border, the 30% rise in crime.

Which did occur, obviously, in the final year of the Trump administration but occurred because of a Democrat embrace and built movement with BLM. And you have a Biden administration now that seems like it’s just constantly trying to put out fires instead of make any real progress for the American people.

What do you think their next moves are? Do we just…? Are we gonna go into the election year here and it’s gonna be nonstop the insurrection talk? How can they try to convince the American voter that’s actually up for grabs that they’re not doing a terrible job?

VANCE: Yeah, it’s a good question. I don’t know how it could get worse. Maybe we should all hold our breath for a plague of locusts and fiery hail falling through the sky. I guess my instinct here is that they’re really gonna turn it up on the insurrection talk, and in particular on trying to I think censor information about what really happened on January 6th and really, I think, turning…

If you think of the vaccine mandate stuff, if you think of the mask mandates, if you think of the way that, yeah, of course there were some bad people on January 6th with be but there are a lot of people who were being held have committed no acts of violence. I really think the play here is to try to create a second class of citizenship among red America.

And make it hard to live a normal life, go to the grocery store, attend a political protest, go to church, even go to a ball game unless you do the things that the Democrats want you to do. And so I tend to think that’s where this is gonna go. That’s my intuition, at least. But who knows? Who knows what they have in store? It’s hard to imagine it getting much worse. But of course, it probably will.

CLAY: JD, you’re in a competitive Ohio primary for the Republican nomination. Donald Trump obviously has had a massive impact when it comes to endorsing candidates in the primary. Do you think that he will endorse you or someone else? Do you think he’ll weigh in? And do you hope yourself that President Trump runs again in 2024?

VANCE: Oh, I certainly think he will run, and I think he’ll win, and I hope that he does. And I think that’s pretty much up to him. And you hear about other Republicans. I think we do have a great bench. But at the end of the day, I was talking with my dad, who is a big, big Trump guy sort of from the moment he came down the escalator and we were talking about all these other great candidates.

I was like, “Well, I’m just curious, Dad. Tell me honestly: If any of these guys ran against Trump in the Republican primary in 2024, who would you vote for?” He said, “Oh, Trump.” I think that’s how a lot of Republican voters feel. So I think he would win and, frankly, I think he’d win by a massive margin in the general election too. You know, in this race, it’s interesting.

I think obviously Trump’s endorsement would be huge. The president would immediately change the nature of the game. I think I’ve got a good chance of getting it, but I also thinks there’s a chance that he completely stays out of it. I’ve heard from the president himself and also people in his inner circle that he’s letting the race develop. I think eventually he’s probably gonna weigh in, and I think I’ve got a good chance when he does, but we’ll see how it unfolds.

BUCK: JD Vance, everybody. JD, good luck to you as a candidate for Senate in Ohio — and, folks, if you haven’t picked up Hillbilly Elegy, go grab a copy. JD, thanks so much.

VANCE: Thanks for having me. Take care, guys.

 

 

Recent Stories

Psnarky Psaki Dismisses Question About Pregnant Illegals

23 Sep 2021

CLAY: We’ve talked a lot about what’s going on at the border during the hours of today’s show. And the White House had a briefing with our good friend Jen Psaki. And Peter Doocy at Fox News asked her about emotionally some of these illegal immigrants giving birth, and they got into a testy exchange. Here is what it sounded like.

DOOCY: You say the border is not open, but we’re told by our teams on the ground you guys are releasing pretty much all family units, couples where the woman says that she is pregnant, or single women who say that they are pregnant, and that nobody actually has to take a pregnancy test unless they want to. So —

PSAKI: Are you suggesting you don’t believe when women say they’re pregnant? Is that a big issue, you think, at the border?

DOOCY: I am not in charge of keeping the border secured. You guys are.

PSAKI: Do you think pregnant women are posing a big threat to the border?

DOOCY: You tell me.

PSAKI: To the border community? Is that a big issue?

DOOCY: You tell me!

PSAKI: I’m not aware of pregnant women being a big area of concern to people at the border.

DOOCY: The issue is not about pregnant women. The issue is, is the border open or is the border closed? Because my understanding is that a lot of this is happening on this side of the border.

PSAKI: I think you know the answer to that question, and I just conveyed clearly that we’re implementing our border restrictions, including Title 42, including making clear that people who are coming through irregular migration, that this is not the time to come and they will be placed in removal proceedings.

BUCK: When is it the time to come illegally? I just want to know. They keep saying, “Hey, not now.”

CLAY: “This is not the time to come, yeah.

BUCK: You’re not supposed to come this way ever.

CLAY: Ever.

BUCK: The law says you never come this way. Also, credit to Peter Doocy there for keeping it cool with “Psnarky Psaki.” She’s getting real snarky up there. It’s getting a little out of hand. Look, Trump was very… He was slapping around reporters.

I’m not gonna pretend like we’re all, “Oh, the vapors! How do we handle it?” But let’s be honest here. She’s being, I think, a little disrespectful to the guy. He’s digging in, as he should, on the realities. Clay, it’s important that there are… It’s not an accident that hundreds of women have traveled thousands of miles to get to the U.S.-Mexico border.

They’re trying to have a baby on U.S. soil to get around the normal immigration system that we have. That’s the whole point. The threat? No one’s saying that they’re about to take over the Capitol building, all the pregnant women. We’re just saying, this is crazy what’s going on.

CLAY: Well, not only that, if you set the precedent that if you say you are pregnant, you are allowed into the United States, then every woman that wants to get into the United States is going to say she’s pregnant if there’s no evidence that she’s actually pregnant. That’s part one here.

Part two of this would be that basically guarantees that whichever women come in who are pregnant, their children become American citizens because, as we talked about earlier, we have birthright citizenship here.

And as you said, Buck, once you have a baby that has American citizenship, the idea of you being deported as the mother of that baby becomes incredibly unlikely, absent some crazy crime that you commit.

BUCK: And, Clay, let’s understand. It’s not only an anchor, so to speak for the mother who’s an illegal who’s in the country, but it also then becomes — just give it some time and the Democrats will say this — we need family reunification. So the husband who may be back in wherever we’re talking about now, Chile?

A Haitian immigrant who’s in Chile or Brazil, and the uncles, whoever, we need to bring the whole family in and bring the whole family together. A lot of our immigration system — now we’re actually talking about the legal immigration system — is premised upon what they call family reunification or essentially bringing a family over that has a portion of it already in the U.S.

And so when you have one kid in the country, it’s a huge leap forward. Games are being played here with the system, and we can all see it. Clay, here’s an example. When I was at the U.S.-Mexico border in Tijuana, San Diego, a while back when there was a surge going on there — this is just a few years ago — they said they had a guy who claimed to be…

Remember, then if you were under 18, you were let into the country. That was whole thing, because you were an “unaccompanied minor.” They had a guy who was 34 ’cause they actually tested him. He was 34 years old; said he was 17. Is that an unaccompanied minor? Should I cry big tears for this guy?

CLAY: No but it’s an example of what I’m talking about: Whatever rule you put in place, it will be exploited. So if your standard is, hey, if you’re a pregnant woman, you get into the country, then guess what? Every woman’s gonna claim she’s pregnant — and I don’t blame ’em for trying to exploit the system because that’s their goal here.

BUCK: Lying to federal officials is actually a crime.

CLAY: I understand.

BUCK: (laughing) It’s technically a crime.

CLAY: But if you’re able to exploit it and they can’t prove that you’re lying, then that’s the point of his question because immediately what happens? Those women come in, they get on their phones, they talk, and they say to every other woman who is interested that they are friends or family with, “Say you’re pregnant and you get in!” Eerybody’s gonna be pregnant.

BUCK: This is what they’ve been saying, that they have a credible fear of nothing specific, but they just all repeat the same things they’ve been told by cartels. Like I said, they have a printout sometimes in Spanish, “Say that you fear violence in your home country” of Honduras or El Salvador or whatever.

Those are countries that have a high homicide rate. It’s about what it is in Chicago, by the way. They’re not in the midst of a grinding civil war with a huge body counts piling up, which is usually what people think of: Syrian refugees where people fleeing after the whole village had been bombed to the ground.

And people were being executed by the shabiha thugs of the Assad regime. That’s refugee status. That’s, “I gotta get outta here or I’m gonna die. ” It’s not, “I’ll get higher wages in America than Brazil after leaving Haiti,” which is what we’re seeing now. But, Clay, the problem is people have to learn all these different games and the system and what goes on for them to really care that much about it except for the concentration of individuals. The visual of this say problem for the Biden administration.

CLAY: Which is why we’re trying to get rid of the concentrations of individuals as quickly as possible even if it means — and I think you’re right that we may well find out that this is the case on Friday — that all of these immigrants to a large extent while they’re saying, hey, we’re flying some back to Haiti, which they are…

It’s a small percentage overall. If those immigrants diffuse themselves into the larger United States population, you don’t end up with the imagery that we saw from the drones and the helicopters flying over in Del Rio, all of these people all together trying to get in the country. It disappears if they’re distributed throughout the width and breadth of the country.

Recent Stories