×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Will Dems Run on Roe v. Wade in 2022?

2 Sep 2021

CLAY: Looking at the Texas law as it pertains to abortion and trying to project what we thought the Supreme Court might do. And, by the way, I’m Clay Travis; he’s Buck Sexton. We appreciate all of you hanging out with us. Encourage you to download the podcast. Blown away by how many of you are listening there. We also always love the 400-plus affiliates we have in all 50 states, and we thank all of you, for being such big proponents for the battles we fight every day, for being the tip of the spear to help us make a difference in this country.

So let’s talk about what’s going on in the Supreme Court. There’s been all these emergency appeals trying to strike down the Texas law. The Supreme Court late last night, issued a little bit, I think, Buck of a preview for where they might be going as many different cases from many different states reached the Supreme Court. I believe Mississippi is up next on the official docket of the Supreme Court and the law that Mississippi has put in place as it pertains to abortion. But predictably, the left-wing in this country, is losing their mind.

Listen to cut 14 here and what Joy Reid had to say on MSNBC last night.

REID: By next summer (dramatic pause), we could be living in our own version of the Handmaid’s Tale, where forced birth is the law in large sections of the country, including (dramatic pause) for children.

CLAY: All right, so that is the discussion that’s going on. Let’s have a more intelligent discussion.

BUCK: Have you ever heard forced birth, by the way? I’m wondering what… You know, they use all these euphemisms for abortion, and they also will have all these scary terms for people actually having their children. But that was a first for me. I’ve never heard that.

CLAY: Yeah, that’s the Handmaid’s Tale, where they’re trying to terrify women all over the country. But here’s the political angle on this mixed with the legal angle, which is what we talked about yesterday. I am not surprised at all that the Supreme Court decision here was 5-4. This is me putting my lawyer hat on. My prediction is that many of these state regulations are going to be held up by a 5-4 vote.

Chief Justice John Roberts is an institutionalist. He’s an incrementalist. He will be terrified by the idea of overturning Roe v. Wade from 1973. I think the balancing act that is going to end up occurring is by default… They’re not going to directly overrule Roe v. Wade. But they are going to allow more and more restrictive state laws to be legal. And that is going to effectively rescind a federal rule on abortion and return the decision, as it pertains to abortion, to individual states and individual state legislatures.

And I believe that margin is going to be 5-4. Even though there is a conservative majority, 6-3, I think John Roberts is going to side with the liberal element here. So in his mind, he can argue this is not a direct political decision. Even though the case is being made, Buck, I think, is going to be not an aggressive court overturning Roe v. Wade. They’re just going to punt this back to the individual states and allow them to make the decision.

BUCK: How do they do that without overturning Roe, because Roe says there’s a federal right to abortion?

CLAY: Interesting. So it’s a good question. So the history has been, what exactly does that right to abortions mean? In terms of how many weeks, what is going to be the standard? And I think they’re going to continue to dial back the number of weeks that a state can restrict abortion.

BUCK: Right. That may be a more Planned Parenthood v. Casey issue, when it comes to the actual specifics of what abortion entails.

CLAY: They’re going to avoid saying, “Hey, we’re directly overturning Roe v. Wade,” and they’re going to cite… This is my prediction. I think they’re going to look at technology, I think they’re going to look at medical advances, what you can determine about the state of a fetus now, compared to even back in 1973. And I think they are going to slowly dial back the amount of protection, federally, that exist, and allow states to incrementally take over more of the decision. That’s my prediction.

BUCK: This is where this is heading, Clay. It’s going to be the nastiest political fight we have seen, probably in our lifetimes.

CLAY: It’s going to be the Kavanaugh hearings on steroids.

BUCK: It’s going to make the fights over election results and things like that, look like a tea party, I think — and not like a Boston Tea Party, a nice one where the people have little China cups and stuff.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: And the reality here is the left is going to go absolutely all out. I mean, there’s this whole machinery of the abortion industry that is enormously influential and powerful. It’s really the only thing, as a Democrat, that you have to sign on. To be a Democrat, you must be pro-choice, pro-abortion.

There’s no room for other things, really, as a Democrat in today’s party or in their party. And they’re going to put a pressure campaign together against sitting Supreme Court justices, the likes of which we have never really seen before. It will be somewhat similar to the ferocity of the smearing Kavanaugh campaign, but it will be much more drawn out. And the stakes in their mind, will be even higher. The left has convinced, unfortunately, millions of women and just leftists in general, that there’s an enslavement of their body that would occur the moment that Roe v. Wade didn’t mean you could have an abortion in all nine months of a pregnancy.

It’s a central pillar of leftism. It’s not just another thing. It is the one thing that they hold sacred on the left above all else. So they’ll fight for this, Clay, more ferociously and in more underhanded fashion to keep this thing alive, than anything else I think we’ve ever seen. Those are the stakes right now, politically for them. And you can see it already. They’re freaked out! Nothing has even happened yet.

CLAY: Yeah, and here’s the big picture, okay? Big picture, I think that the Democratic Party, they failed on the economy. They failed on the border. They failed on Afghanistan. They’re failing on covid. All of those are failures. I think that this is going to be what they run on in 2022, Buck.

BUCK: Well, if your prediction about the court is correct and there’s a major pairing back of the rights of Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

CLAY: Even if it doesn’t happen, they’re setting the narrative that it’s going to happen, Buck, and they’re going to try to go after these suburban women. We talk about the 40% you lost; the 40% you got. Suburban women are in that 20%. They are what helped to get Joe Biden elected, and suburban men.

BUCK: But without Trump in the picture, do you think that really works? It’s going to be members of Congress. It’s gonna be senators and the state level.

CLAY: It’s a great question, and I think this is where they are desperation-wise though, Buck.

BUCK: What else do they have?

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: They have the insurrection.

CLAY: Which I don’t believe is going to work, right? So I’m just trying to think, where are the battles going to be fought? Politics is about choosing the battles that you want to fight that you think you can win. I think there are losers on the economy. Losers on covid. Losers on the border. Losers on murder and crime.

BUCK: By the way, I don’t even know if you have to say, “I think,” Clay.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: We could say the data reflects it. Of course, I agree objectively speaking, that’s what’s going on. Even the data reflects what you’re saying, based on the poll numbers that Joe Biden currently has.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: I also think they got a little lazy, where even the Russia collusion didn’t work to get Trump out of office, but it was incredibly effective — and people hate what I say this. They know it’s true. It’s incredibly effective as a smear to get into gears of the Trump administration —

CLAY: It delegitimized a lot. Yes.

BUCK: — to slow them down, to create all these other narratives, and to throw people into depositions and make them defend themselves, and all this crap that the Trump team had to deal with because of the Russia collusion lie. Now they think with the insurrection, “Oh, we’ll kind of run the same playbook of this thing that we make a huge deal about that we talk about forever.” But it doesn’t work when you’re in power, because people actually want results.

CLAY: That’s right. This is it. I think you’re right. This is the play. I’m not telling you where we are right now. I’m telling you, what is going to be the play in 2022? I think you’re right. Insurrection can’t work. It can motivate maybe some of that base. They can try it.

BUCK: They’ll try.

CLAY: But I don’t think it will resonate in suburban districts. What they’re going to go after is the Handmaid’s Tale argument that Joy Reid just tried to argue, that you are not going to be able to make a choice about whether or not to have a baby.

BUCK: But we do have to remember that it is likely, when we look back at the Kavanaugh situation — and I was living in D.C. and living a few blocks from the White House and just down the street from Capitol Hill when that whole thing went down, and it was crazy in that city, and people were astonished at how… It wasn’t just ugly. It was evil what they were doing to Brett Kavanaugh.

CLAY: Yes. Yes.

BUCK: The lies that people were telling about him. The way the media was reporting on it. Like I said, it made a lot of wartime conservatives out of people. But, Clay, that probably kept the Democrats from taking the Senate in 2018. Remember, that was… You know, I remember there were senators. I actually spoke to Lindsey Graham about it. Tucker gave him the rough treatment last night.

CLAY: Lindsey Graham was phenomenal in the Kavanaugh hearings.

BUCK: He was amazing on Kavanaugh, and he was going around on the election cycle, talking about that issue. He was. No, that was Lindsey Graham’s best moment ever. I saw the Tucker thing last night and thought, “Whew! Okay.” See? Sometimes, things get heated even within the GOP tent.

CLAY: I think you’re right. I think as bad as that hearing was in the Senate, I think this is going to be on steroids in 2022, ’cause I think it’s the only angle the Democrats think they can play.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Leaked Transcript Reveals Another Biden Lie

2 Sep 2021

BUCK: The big headline, I think, for a lot of folks is that more than half, they think, of the translators and other SIVs — SIV, Special Immigrant Visa — recipients that were supposed to — under agreement with the United States government — get out, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that less than half of them actually got out.

CLAY: Yeah, this is just… It really is crazy, Buck. You can’t even satirize the futility, the failure and the catastrophic disaster that is our leaving of Afghanistan. Nothing, Buck.

You can’t even point to anything and say, “Hey, you know what? This went better than we reasonably could have expected” as all of this comes out. Including, by the way, more lies from Biden that he was requesting from the Afghani president. It’s all just adding up to a level of futility that’s even worse than any of us could have ever possibly believed.

BUCK: Jen Psaki posed with the query about the leaked transcript. Just so you know, there’s a transcript that Reuters reported on and now everyone is reporting on it. It’s a call between Joe Biden and the —

CLAY: Afghani president.

BUCK: Yes, the president of Afghanistan, Ashraf Ghani. Former president, ’cause now the —

CLAY: Yes. Yeah, yeah. Well…

BUCK: — Taliban as of today has a few announcements. One, they’re forming a new government, because they actually run the country and are in charge, no surprise. And we’re also already beginning to hear from some of our generals about how the Taliban may become… (chuckling) I’m just telling you what they’re saying. This is one of those things where I don’t even want to say it because there are going to be heads exploding all over the country, especially for our veterans who were fighting the Taliban for so many years.

That the Taliban — according to the generals, the four stars, et cetera — could become a counterterrorism partner against the Islamic State! Now, let me tell you right now, I would not hold your breath on that one in any meaningful way. We can’t even count on Pakistan to be a reliable — as a country, to be a reliable — counterterrorism partner. I don’t think the new Taliban government in Afghanistan, is going to be suddenly someone who we can count on to, let’s be honest, past intelligence to us and/or take action themselves in “kinetic strikes,” a euphemistic way of saying, “killing bad guys,” on behalf of our war on terror. I know this is the upside-down, crazy world we’re living in. Here’s Jen Psaki on that leaked transcript.

REPORTER: Was the president in any way pushing a false narrative in that call with the Afghan president?

PSAKI: I think it’s pretty clear — again, I’m not going to go into details of a private conversation. But what we saw over the course of the last few months is a — a collapse in leadership, and that was happening even before Ghani left the country.

BUCK: Um, the answer to the question is, “Yes, Joe Biden was pushing him to lie to his own people,” lie to Ashraf Ghani’s people, and now he’s with people… I don’t know. Now he’s probably in the south of France buying a lot of Chanel handbags. But the point is, Joe Biden wanted him to lie and say that they weren’t losing, when they were.

CLAY: And also, how about we get the transcript fully of this one, or the audio? I mean, if you’re going to impeach Trump — and, again, I know impeachment is not going to lead anywhere. But the standard for Trump impeachment was one call with the Ukrainian president. Here is Joe Biden not only failing in Afghanistan, but asking for the leader of Afghanistan to lie to help his messaging both in Afghanistan and also Joe Biden in America. I mean, it’s crazy.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: It’s absolutely insane.

BUCK: And by the way, if there was nothing wrong with it, then why doesn’t Joe Biden say, “You know what? Look, it’s wartime. We had to say what we had to say.” Right?

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: No. Instead, they want to pretend that they were doing that.

Recent Stories

Vivek Ramaswamy on Battling Corporate Wokeism

2 Sep 2021

CLAY: We are going to be joined here in a moment by Vivek Ramaswamy, who has done a great job with his most recent book, Woke, Inc., which debuted at #2 overall on the New York Times best-seller list. And I believe we have Vivek on with us now, and I appreciate you making the time. Vivek, I want to start with this. I don’t know if you’ve been paying attention to the Joe Rogan controversy and also the controversies out there surrounding Candace Owens. But she requested a covid test, and the company refused service to her, which is I think one of the trend lines that we’re seeing with woke corporations deciding whether or not to give medical treatment they either agree or disagree with. How big of a trend do you think this is becoming and where did it start?

RAMASWAMY: Yeah, look, Clay, I think it’s becoming rampant. It’s everywhere across America. It’s ubiquitous. That’s part of why I wrote the book, and I think it needs to be called out because the origin story wasn’t even earthed on either side. It didn’t begin with politics. It began with self-interest. That was the 2008 financial crisis, where after the ’08 financial crisis, corporations were the bad guys.

They were the guys that the old left wanted to take money from and redistribute it to the poor people for the benefit of poor people. Agree or not, that’s what the old left wanted to say. But there was this newly emergent identity politics focus left — what we think of as the new, woke, progressive left — that actually says the real problem wasn’t economic injustice. It was poverty. It was actually racial injustice and misogyny and bigotry.

And that presented the opportunity of a generation for big business in this country to say that, “Okay. If we can pitch ourselves to that part of the left, then we can put the old left up for adoption,” and so you had a bunch of woke millennials that get in bed with a bunch of big banks. Together, they brought woke capitalism, and they put Occupy Wall Street up for adoption. But this is the other side of that trade.

Where anyone who defects that woke orthodoxy will have economic muscle and economic power leveraged against them, increasingly to be banished from civil society itself. And part of the reason why I wrote the book, I have some pretty clear ideas of solutions we can use from a policy perspective and a culture of perspective to get our way out of that cultural quagmire, that we’re in today.

BUCK: Hi, Vivek, it’s Buck. We got an audience here that’s very activated and wants to take action on things like this. So we’ll certainly get to that with you in a second. For more background on this — and I know you did a lot of research on it for the book, and congrats on how well it’s doing. In general… I know there’s going to be specifics here and there. There are people who will say, “Get woke, go broke,” and then there’s people who say, “Actually, this works very well.”

Meaning that progressive policies in the short-term, help the bottom line of some of these major companies whether it’s Google or Disney or Coca-Cola or whomever. What do you find on balance is more true? Is this financially incentivized for them in the beginning to have these very progressive and exclusionary — for conservatives and people who believe in traditional values — politics or are they suffering, and there therefore is some kind of a mechanism built-in for correction?

RAMASWAMY: So that’s a great question. I got about 75/25. I get about 75% of the cases, companies are doing what they perceive to be in their self-interest. Now, whether or not it is in their self-interest, time will tell. And I think that 75% number is actually going to be lower, the number of companies discover that they’re leaving a lot of market share on the table by failing to service conservative audiences — or even just not apolitical audiences may be turned off by this stuff.

I think Nike may find themselves in that category. I think Coca-Cola may find themselves in that category. But that, time will tell. However, I do think that in the majority of cases, you actually have companies that think they are doing the things that better empowers them to ultimately make a buck in the future. I think the other 25% is in a different category, where they’re actually pursuing these values authentically.

And I think one of the things I discovered over writing the book is if I had to pick… I began the book taking aim at the hypocritical, scammy kind of woke capitalism, where people are using the appearance of caring about things other than profit and power, precisely to gain things like profit and power. But actually, the thing I have learned, personally, is that I’m even more frightened by the people who would their market power authentically to force their values down the throats of the American people.

I put Jack Dorsey in this category, where the guy doesn’t need another dollar. He doesn’t care if he makes another dollar. He has tens of billions of dollars. But the rate limiter for his power in society isn’t the amount of dollars he has. It’s the scope of what money itself can buy. And so what he’s decided is to use his platform as a mechanism for effectuating his vision for what can and can’t be discussed or should and shouldn’t be discussed online.

He’s one example among many of that other 25% category where they don’t care if it hits the bottom line or not. They can afford that. They actually do want to use this as a you-only-live-once philosophy, to use their corporate platform, to ultimately legislate through the back door what they could never do if they were actually held democratically accountable.

CLAY: We’re talking to Vivek Ramaswamy. I’d encourage you to check out his book Woke, Inc. It debuted at #2 overall on the New York Times. Vivek, I want to talk about this. I came from sprots (chuckles) and I feel like sports was on the cutting edge, unfortunately, for embracing Woke, Inc. You mentioned Nike. Colin Kaepernick is a big part of this. The NBA is among the wokest organizations anywhere in the entirety of America; the NFL has followed behind it.

Even Major League Baseball pulling their All-Star Game out of Atlanta. All of that has been on the front edge of what many other corporations have followed. Do you buy into the idea that sports has helped to drive the cultural move to Woke, Inc.? I see sports fans fundamentally rejecting it, to go to Buck’s point on “get woke, go broke.” Do you buy into that? What did you your data show you about the sports industry in particular, and its impact on the woke culture?

RAMASWAMY: There’s two points about sports in particular, Clay. One is that this used to be the space that brought us together —

CLAY: Amen.

RAMASWAMY:– in a divided polity like the United States. We are a divided culture politically. We can survive as a politically divided country. We can’t survive as a politically divided country if we also lack apolitical spaces that we can still come together in the baseball stadiums of this country, in the football stadiums of this country, in the basketball stadiums in this country. Those are the places that brought us together whether black or white or Republican or Democrat.

I think the divided polity — even a severely divided body politic — can survive. But it cannot survive if we lose those apolitical sanctuaries. That’s the first thing I say. The second thing I say is that the sports associations are among the worse in actually geopolitically empowering China at the expense of the United States. I’ll tell you exactly what I mean.

When you have an organization like the NBA or a superstar like LeBron James, that relentlessly — and I mean relentlessly — criticizes the United States, and alleges social justice here and racism and microaggression here at home without saying a peep about actual human rights abuses in China, what they are effectively doing is creating a false moral equivalence between Chinese nihilism and American idealism on the global stage, and that helps China.

Because now, when Xi Jinping is pressed by the E.U. or U.N. on the Uighur human rights crisis where he has over a million Uighurs enslaved in concentration camps, subject to forced sterilization in what I consider to be a worst human rights abuses by a major nation since the Third Reich of Germany, they are able to say to the U.N. and the E.U. that Black Lives Matter.

So the United States is no better, and that China hopes the United States does better on human rights, which is what their top diplomat said to us in Alaska this month. That would be laughable, if it weren’t for the fact that folks like LeBron James actually come to China’s public defense after Daryl Morey, the general manager of the Houston Rockets, tweets, “Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong.”

And so that actually erodes the greatest asset of the United States of all, which is our cultural and our moral standing on the global stage. That’s eve more important than our nuclear arsenal in my opinion. A lot of these sports associations kowtowing to China, bowing to their true Chinese overlords to be able to expand into the lucrative Chinese market, they’re unwilling to criticize the Chinese Communist Party. But they are reserving their moral outrage for the United States in a way that hurts both ends of the trade.

CLAY: All right, Vivek. This is where we get do tell everybody listening, what can they do? I mean, we always say — and we actually mean it from the bottom of our hearts — the sponsors, for example, we have on this show. They’re standing with our message and with our free speech. So there’s an action item, in a sense, of supporting those creators who speak out — those voices who speak out — in favor of freedom and the Constitution and just sanity and public life. But if people want to tackle Woke, Inc. out there, what else can they do?

RAMASWAMY: Look, I think the most important battle line right now is in our schools. It is in the minds of the next generation of Americans. And I think that anyone who is a parent who has kids in schools — be it public or private — to be able to stand up for an ideology that we teach in the schools that ultimately revise American idealism, rather than criticize the United States so much so that the next generation doesn’t even know what those values are, I think that’s the single most important battle line for anybody who is a parent.

Now, I think that there is a lot of people that come out on the side of consumer boycotts. Boycotting woke brands and sort of trying to create a new right-wing or conservative or even apolitical alternative. I’m actually… While I understand the appeal of that, I’m less a fan of that. Because at the end of the day, as I said earlier, if we have two forms of coffee, if we have two forms of baseball — at the end of this — we won’t have a country left at the end of it.

Even though that might be a great opportunity for a conservative entrepreneur, and if this were Shark Tank you have a guy who’s half competent who wants to start that business, I would say, “Bet on it,” as an investment prospect. I would say that as a matter of leaving America better off in the end, I’m not as drawn to that set of solutions, as I am to fostering civic identities. Fostering shared civic identities in the next generation in our schools. I think that’s where I’m most focused.

That being said, I think there’s also some policy solutions that can make a real difference in the short run. You have companies that are using their economic muscle to be able to discriminate against one side of the political spectrum. I say that if you can’t discriminate against somebody because they’re black or gay or Muslim or white or Christian or Jew or whatever, you should not be able to discriminate against them just because of their political perspective either.

That brings us back to Candace Owens example in the beginning. If you can’t discriminate against somebody on the basis of the color of their skin, you shouldn’t be able to do it on the basis of their political perspective, either. Same goes for just as you can’t on the basis of religion, you can’t be able to do it on the basis of their expressed political beliefs. I think we can easily make that change.

Add it to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Put political speech and political belief right up there, next to race, sex, religion. I think that should be at the top of the conservative agenda. I think we have a lot of Republicans right now who are fearful of doing anything that defies their orthodoxy that they memorized 40 years ago in 1980, which is that the free market can do no wrong, without recognizing that the free market that they idealize doesn’t exist today.

BUCK: I agree with you. “Defending individual rights is the opposite of big government,” as conservatives like to say.

RAMASWAMY: Yeah. Exactly.

BUCK: Vivek. Woke, Inc. is the book. We appreciate you being with us. Best of luck and we’ll talk to you soon.

RAMASWAMY: Thanks for having me. Talk to ya.

Recent Stories

China Cracks Down on Video Games

2 Sep 2021

CLAY: So China is now cracking down. This is amazing in terms of the authority that the Chinese government is undertaking. They are limiting everyone under the age of 18. They are making them register to play online, and they are allowing only three hours of video games over the weekend. And they aren’t allowed to play video games at all, during the week, because they are convinced that kids in China are spending too much time on video games.

That’s how Draconian their control is now, Buck. They’re not allowing kids under 18 to play video games, basically, during the week at all online where you have to register with your real name. This is, I think, an interesting larger societal story about what’s going on in China, the amount of control they’re exerting over their people.

BUCK: I’m amazed in some places, including the U.S., there is this whole culture of — and I admit it. I had to like stop playing the video games, get to the gym more, get more sleep, important things post covid, post lockdown. But there are of people that are celebrities from playing video games, and people in large numbers — and for people listening to this, I’m sure a lot of them didn’t know. I didn’t even know this until the last couple of years.

CLAY: Oh yeah. Esports is monstrous.

BUCK: The viewership of other people playing video games, I guess, at a very high level. We probably should start a Clay and Buck Call of Duty team, because we could have a lot of fun with that.

CLAY: Yes!

BUCK: You have these massive multi-player games. I’m not going to lie. I’m pretty handy with the shotgun, folks. But nonetheless, it’s one of these things where the Chinese government is clearly cracking down as part of a policy to make their kids do more homework, I guess. Right? That’s really what this is about.

CLAY: It’s true. And what’s funny, I know there are a lot of people out there who are like me, and you’re like, “Man, I hate everything that China represents.” But then you see this story and then you’re like, “Hey, you know what? Kids not playing video games and instead learning their “times tables,” and not focusing on that idiot L.A. school union who came out and said:

“Oh, we don’t worry about our kids being in school, because they learned what a riot was and they learned what an insurrection was,” and you’re like, “Are you kidding?” China, at least when it comes to education, is not screwing around, and I just think this is an interesting subset here. Because to what extent is there going to be a rebellion against control like this that is existing inside of China?

Recent Stories

Rush Wouldn’t Let Bill Clinton Rewrite the History of 9/11

2 Sep 2021

Be sure to listen daily to Rush’s Timeless Wisdom podcast here or on iHeartRadio. It’s absolutely essential information from America’s Forever Anchorman.

Recent Stories

EIB 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Stack of Stuff

2 Sep 2021

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Joe Rogan (@joerogan)

  • FOXNews: Joe Rogan treats COVID-19 with ivermectin – but FDA, CDC warn against its use for coronavirus
  • NBC: Joe Rogan says he has Covid, took widely discredited drug ivermectin
  • Newsweek: Candace Owens Says She Was Refused COVID Test Because of Her Anti-Vaccination Stance

  • New York Post: 6 lies Joe Biden told about Afghanistan
  • FOXNews: Trump says Taliban feared him; blasts Biden’s ‘tremendous disrespect’ for troops
  • NPR: Biden’s Approval Rating Hits A New Low After The Afghanistan Withdrawal
  • Daily Wire: Even Dem-Aligned Polls Showing Biden’s Popularity Plummeting
  • CNN: White supremacist praise of the Taliban takeover concerns US officials
  • New York Post: At least eight people killed overnight in NYC in historic flooding
  • New York Post: Joe Biden’s call to Afghan prez is impeachable – Miranda Devine
  • Breitbart: White House Refuses to Confirm or Deny Embarrassing Details of Joe Biden’s Call with Afghanistan President
  • PJ Media: Check Out What the Biden Administration Just Did to Websites Listing Weapons It Gave to the Taliban
  • HotAir: Biden admin after Afghanistan disgrace: Now watch this domestic-policy drive!

  • UKDM: Is it time to stop obsessing over Covid figures? Statistics reveal virus is NOT the biggest killer – with heart disease, dementia and cancer each claiming four times as many lives in an average week last month
  • IBT: California Teacher Fired After Bragging About Having Antifa Flag in His Classroom, Turning Students into ‘Revolutionaries’ in Undercover Video
  • Federalist: Dr. Scott Atlas: Science Killed Itself Over COVID-19
  • CNSNews: Rep. Cory Bush: Texas’ New ‘Heartbeat Bill’ Limiting Abortion ‘Will Disproportionately Harm’ the State’s ‘Queer’ Citizens
  • PJ Media: There’s a Problem in the Upper Reaches of Our Military – Victor Davis Hanson
  • Townhall: Maybe If Biden Yells Loud Enough? – Chris Stigall
  • Townhall: Biden Is A Dirtbag Who’s Always Exploited Tragedy – Derek Hunter
  • Daily Wire: VA Suicide Hotline Received Over 35K Calls Between August 13-29: Report
  • Breitbart: Donald Trump: All U.S. States Should Go to Paper Ballots, Same-Day in-Person Voting, Voter ID
  • PJ Media: L.A. Teachers’ Union Boss: Math Less Important Than Learning About ‘Insurrections’ and ‘Coups’
  • Daily Caller: Ilhan Omar Possibly Committed A Felony By Concealing Her Finances In Required Disclosure Form, Watchdog Group Alleges

  • Recent Stories

    EIB 24/7 Video: Clay Pledges to Hold Dems Accountable

    2 Sep 2021

    In this exclusive video for EIB 24/7 VIPs, Clay talks about Biden’s failure in Afghanistan and pledges that this show will hold him and the Democrats accountable.

    Only EIB 24/7 members can access this exclusive analysis.

    If you’re not a member, sign up now. You can also use the special VIP email to tell Clay and Buck what you think about this topic or anything else on your mind.

    Watch It Here:

    Recent Stories

    Glenn Beck on His Mission to Rescue People in Afghanistan

    1 Sep 2021

    CLAY: Really excited to be joined now by Glenn Beck, who gave Buck Sexton his start in media, which is reason enough to be excited for him to be here. But he’s also the nationally syndicated radio host, founder of The Blaze. Glenn, I don’t know that we’ve ever spoken. This is Clay. You obviously have been wildly successful.

    We got to commend you right now, to start off this interview for the work that you have done on behalf of Christians in Afghanistan. For people who may not have heard what you have been doing, tell us that backstory, where did the idea come from, and what has the impact of your fundraising tens of millions of dollars been for all these Afghanistan Christians?

    BECK: Well, first of all, I’m a big fan of yours too — and, of course, Buck, you guys are doing a great job. And I do not envy you, on what you guys are doing. But with that said, this idea came to me… I mean, we started The Nazarene Fund, when no one was rescuing the Yazidis in Syria and Iraq. And they were trapped on a mountain.

    And then these Christians here crucified. And nobody was doing anything. And I thought, “What are…? Why…? What…?” Somebody’s got to stand up. And so we did. And we raised money. And we’ve moved, I think — I can’t remember the numbers — but about 30,000 people we have moved out of the Middle East to countries like Australia, I think Brazil.

    CLAY: Wow.

    BECK: There’s several countries around the world. And what’s strange is, we became, like, known in the region for doing it, and somehow or another, we became like the go-to people. And I don’t know how that happened. It just did. And then, when this happened in Afghanistan and all these Christians were marked, that’s our charter.

    I called our COO, Rudy Atallah, who used to be on the National Security Council. He is a… I think he’s a colonel or was a colonel for the Air Force. And he’s just really buttoned up, and he’s our COO. And I called him, and I said, “Rudy, how do we get these people out and what would that cost?” So he said, “I’ll figure it out and I’ll call you in the morning.” Well, when he called me, I was on the air, and he gave me a number and I almost choked. He said, “It will cost about 30 million — or, 20 million to get it done.”

    CLAY: Wow.

    BECK: And I’m like, “You’ve got to be kidding me,” and I said — and he said, “We would need the money by Friday, because we need to be able to secure the aircraft and everything else.” And I didn’t think it could be done. And we were on the air, and I said to the audience, “Now is the time. If we believe in, ‘We hold these … truths self-evident,’ that we band together. I’m tired of being told, ‘There’s nothing you can do.’ I’m tired of feeling that way.”

    And so we raised $20 million in three days. It was incredible. It was like $22 million in three days. It’s now up to $35 million. But more importantly, we and our partners on the ground, we have moved about 12,000 Christians and people who are targeted. Not just Christians. This is a humanitarian disaster that we never thought it would be this bad. So we are moving —

    BUCK: Glenn, it’s Buck. And, of course, always good to talk to you, my friend. I want to know. Because I saw some of your reporting on this. And some of just what was being said, that the State Department was making this harder for you? I mean, one would think that the State Department —

    CLAY: Ohhhh.

    BUCK: Oh, I know the State Department, so I’m not surprised. But tell us how that went down. Because it would seem like you raising a lot of money to save a lot of people’s lives is something that the Biden administration could get along with too. But apparently there were some issues.

    BECK: Yeah. Buck, I just got a briefing about an hour ago. I’m glad this interview wasn’t an hour ago because I had a full-fledged meltdown. You cannot believe the evil that is being done in the American people’s name by the State Department. There’s an incident that just happened that is beyond — that I would renounce my citizenship!

    I will renounce my citizenship if something isn’t done when this comes to full light. It is horrendous what they’re doing. But the State Department — and it can no longer be chalked up to incompetence. They are openly mocking us now on the phone. They have said at the beginning of this — and we kind of believed it, that they were not giving us…

    I think these are called DIP clearances to be able to take a plane off and have it land in another country. We’re not asking them to vouch for the manifest. We’re not asking them to vouch for us. We’re just asking them to tell the other country that we haven’t smuggled children out and that plane can land. They have our manifest. They know who’s on the plane.

    I can’t tell you because of what’s going on, but there is blood on their hands — blood on their hands — and when America finds out what’s going on, every congressman, every senator should be called right now and demand that the secretary of state answer for everything that is going on in the Middle East. Our guy… I mean, I can’t tell you this either.

    Buck, you know me, and you know the kind of people that I surround myself with. I surround myself with people like you. They’re good. They’re really good people. The guy who is our COO, like I said, was part of I think two president’s National Security Council. He said to me about an hour ago, he’s never seen anything like this. And he cannot figure out, other than evil, why our planes keep getting canceled, why our manifest just might happen to show up in the hands of a Taliban fighter. What the hell is going on?

    CLAY: Glenn, you’re a student of history. And I know there’s a lot of people listening to us right now that are outraged by what they’re seeing going on. Is this the most incompetent American foreign policy exit disaster that you have seen in your life? How can you even compare it — or can you — to anything else that we’ve seen?

    BECK: I can’t. I can’t compare this as incompetent and a disaster on any level. I mean, I’ve talked to members of Parliament over in England. I have talked to prime ministers and ambassadors all over the world. What they tell me about us — thank God, not about our military. Maybe about our military brass and civilian control.

    But about our administration and about our State Department, I’ve never heard anything like this said about us, at any time. At any time. It is a full-fledged meltdown. It will take years to restore our credibility. Beyond that, the other crisis I can compare it to, if I look at this story as a minuscule example — just a microscopic example of what’s going on right now — is the U.S.S. St. Louis, where we carried Jews that were destined for death, and we wouldn’t allow any of our borders to be opened for them. That is a scar that will last forever. That’s nothing — nothing — compared to what’s happening right now.

    BUCK: Glenn, we have to ask. What happens now? I know you have operational security concerns for ongoing efforts to get people out and to make sure that you can continue on with this work. But can you just give us a sense of, one — in the broadest strokes if you have to — what is next, and also for anyone listening who wants to help in whatever way they can, how can they do so with your efforts to get thousands of Christians and others who deserve to get out of Afghanistan to get out?

    BECK: I can’t, Buck. I’m not you. I’m not used to the lingo of… I don’t know. I stop myself all the time from saying too much, ‘ccause you get people killed or you destroy missions. So I can only tell you, do not mistake silence for inaction. There are so many things going on inside and outside of Afghanistan. This is going to be the largest rescue. But not by the federal government. This will end up being the largest private rescue ever attempted. This is our beaches… Uh, I’m trying to hear the name of the operation where the British sent all of the boats over.

    BUCK: Dunkirk.

    BECK: Yeah. Dunkirk. This is our Dunkirk, and it’s going to be just like in Dunkirk, the people that did it. Not the government. If you want to help, I will tell you, the biggest thing — and I am not saying this… I’m not saying this to be cute or whatever. I mean this sincerely. America has to pray like she’s never prayed before.

    Because our country is in real trouble. What’s happening right now with the lies that are coming out of Washington from this administration, just simply on the number of people that have been left behind — Americans that have been left behind — is reprehensible. There is blood on the hands of the State Department. They are openly mocking us when…

    I can’t give you more details other than that. Openly mocking us as they thwart us. There is evil that is happening. And we’ve got to ask God to calm our hearts, keep us peaceful, walk in the way of Christ, bless our country. Forgive our country for all of the things that we have done. But it’s only going to be saved by Him, and pray for the people in Afghanistan who are in hiding right now. Buck, I know you’ve been in situations like this. They are in hiding, fearing for their life — and most of them are alone, fearing for their life in hiding.

    BUCK: How can people help? How can we help?

    BECK: Go to TheNazareneFund.org. TheNazareneFund.org.

    BUCK: Glenn, can we have you back to tell us, when you can, more about how this is going?

    BECK: sure.

    BUCK: Because we know this is not over. We have Americans and others still left behind enemy lines.

    BECK: Yes. I would be more than happy. When I can tell the story, I am going to relish telling the story of the heroes and the monsters.

    BUCK: Glenn Beck, nationally syndicated radio host, founder of TheBlaze.com —

    CLAY: Thanks. Thanks for all you’re doing.

    BECK: You bet.

    BUCK: — and the guy who gave me my start when I got out of the CIA. And, Glenn, forever grateful, my friend. Thank you so much.

    BECK: Thank you. God bless both you guys.

    BUCK: I mean, there you have it, Clay. The State Department… Look, Glenn… I’m going want to to hear the whole story. I know there’s a lot of moving pieces. This isn’t the first time they’ve done something like this. So they understand how to get this going. They’ve obviously already gotten thousands of people out. But you can just tell from his voice.

    I mean, the Biden administration, I’m sure at some level, they just didn’t want to be shown up my private citizens. I know others. I know ex-special operations folks in particular who are trying to do everything they can as private citizens. And I can’t even describe on the air, some of the things that I know they’re doing, because of operational security concerns, to get people out so they don’t end up on a video in orange pajamas. We all know what that means.

    CLAY: Yeah. Dunkirk is a great example. For those of you out there, who are history nerds like we are, the British people saved their army. And in many ways, a lot of great people, all over the world — many of them Americans — are doing whatever they can, to get as many people out, safely out of Afghanistan, as they can. But my goodness, what a closely calamitous failure by the Biden administration with what’s going on in Afghanistan.

    Recent Stories

    EIB 24/7 Video: How Glenn Beck Gave Me My Start

    1 Sep 2021

    In this exclusive video for EIB 24/7 VIPs, Buck gives the backstory on how Glenn Beck, who appeared on the program today, gave him his start in media.

    Only EIB 24/7 members can access this exclusive information.

    If you’re not a member, sign up now. You can also use the special VIP email to tell Clay and Buck what you think about this topic or anything else on your mind.

    Watch It Here:

    Recent Stories

    President Trump to C&B: Rush Would Be Proud

    1 Sep 2021

    PRESIDENT TRUMP: I’ve been watching and I’m looking at your ratings. Rush would be very proud of you. I’ll tell you, Rush was our friend. Rush was incredible. You know, I didn’t know Rush, and I came down the escalator with our great First Lady — our future First Lady at that time — and Rush loved it and he loved what I had to say. He said, “He’s speaking the truth,” and he was there, and I didn’t know Rush. And I got to know him well and he was great. He would be very proud of you two guys.

    BUCK: Really appreciated the kind words yesterday from President Trump there. Welcome back to the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. This is Buck. We’re so blessed to have had a chance again, to talk to number 45, Donald J. Trump, former president, and we were excited to go down to Mar-a-Lago — assuming we can make it happen. He’s got a busy schedule. You know, he’s got to help — like us, Clay, he has to prevent — the country from collapsing at the hands of the commies.

    CLAY: Yeah.

    BUCK: But we’re definitely working on it.

    CLAY: How bad, by the way, did he want to with us, just go ahead and announce that he was running?

    BUCK: I know.

    CLAY: I thought he might do it.

    BUCK: I know. Look, this would be a good place. This would be a good place to do it. So, we’ll see if we can get him to do it. And we’re certainly hopeful of that.

     

    Recent Stories