×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Dr. Marty Makary on CDC Confusion and Natural Immunity

14 Sep 2021

CLAY: We are joined now by Dr. Makary, who is a big-time, I would say, analyst of covid data. He’s at Johns Hopkins. He’s got a recent book: The Price We Pay: What Broke America’s Health Care and How to Fix It. I’m reading today Wall Street Journal Wall Street Journal op-ed page: “Covid Confusion at the CDC.”

Doctor, you write… I want to read this paragraph for our audience. You write, “Israel published data that showed with 700,000 people included, natural immunity was 27 times more effective than vaccinated immunity in preventing symptomatic infections of covid.” Thank you for joining us, Doctor. Why has America been so bad at producing our own data, and why have we avoided talking very often about natural immunity in general, in your mind?

DR. MAKARY: Well, good to be with you guys. Thanks for having me. I’m not sure why we have not been able to produce data. We’ve got $57 billion at the NIH and CDC and about 30,000 employees. I don’t know what they’re doing, to be honest with you. I don’t know if they’re browsing through the Office Depot catalog or getting things notarized on their lunch break.

CLAY: (chuckling)

DR. MAKARY: It’s inexplicable that all the good data is coming out of Israel. The only cluster randomized control trial of masks, looking at different types of masks, came out of Bangladesh. We’re the United States of America. Why are we getting blindsided by overwhelming data that natural immunity is 27 times more effective when our public health officials have been parroting the opposite? They had it backwards.

BUCK: Dr. Makary, it’s Buck. I saw Dr. Fauci last week. I mean, Dr. Fauci seems to be on TV every five minutes. I didn’t know this was actually an official role at the NIH or NIAID or whatever it is. But Dr. Fauci is constantly out there spreading Fauciism. He was finally asked in a way that I hadn’t seen before about natural immunity, and he kind of said a version of, “Yeah, that’s interesting. We’ll look into that.” How is it possible that we’re 18 months into this pandemic and they don’t have data? Is it fair to say that they just don’t view this as a priority?

DR. MAKARY: Well, it interfered with the political edict to vaccinate every American. And when you had anything that got in the way of that edict, it became marginalized and downplayed by our public health leaders. And there are a lot of things out there that said, “Hey, wait a minute. The second dose in kids is causing heart complications.”

Doesn’t matter! They still gotta get vaccinated. So we have seen a lot of things like that sort of interfere with the political agenda. And, remember, they’re an old school group of docs. The people calling all the shots with covid, it’s a very small group of very old doctors, and they have groupthink.

CLAY: I appreciate you being on with us, Dr. Makary, and for all the work that you’re doing at Johns Hopkins. That’s probably the number one question, natural immunity. In your mind, when you look at Europe which is doing, in many countries, a pretty good job of acknowledging natural mutiny. When Joe Biden is coming out and saying, “Hey, I’m going to mandate federal vaccinations…”

Let’s leave aside the legality of whether that’s possible. There’s a discussion about the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. Aren’t we overlooking tens of millions and potentially a hundred million or more people — including people like Buck and myself — who have already had covid and recovered from it, as though we don’t exist? Shouldn’t this be an important part of our discussion about how our nation responds to covid?

DR. MAKARY: Well, ignoring natural immunity has put the credibility of public health, because we really want to encourage — I want to encourage, most doctors want to encourage — all adults who have not had the infection to get vaccinated and to do it quickly. And that message got really hurt by all this dishonesty around natural immunity, ignoring it, blowing it off.

So that was a big setback, and I think part of the issue right now is that they are coming around way too late. It’s sad because, to be honest with you, tens of thousands of Americans died December through April when we were rationing our limited vaccine supply and we were giving it to people with natural immunity. We should have had them step aside.

BUCK: That’s a great point.

DR. MAKARY: The hypothesis hurt a lot of people.

BUCK: We’re speaking with Dr. Marty Makary. He’s with John Hopkins University School of Medicine. He’s got a great piece in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, “Covid Confusion at the CDC,” an eloquent version of what I’ve been saying all the time, which is that the CDC is a bureaucratic monstrosity. As a former federal government employee, I know a bureaucratic monstrosity when I see one, Doc.

I want know if you’ve seen this piece published in The Atlantic where they looked at all the different hospitalizations starting, I believe, from January to June of this year, and the piece comes away with — and it was by Zweig, who I believe we had, Clay, earlier on the show, remember? Was he the New York Magazine reporter? I think it’s the same guy.

CLAY: Yes, we did. That’s right. I think that’s right.

BUCK: Yeah, New York Magazine he wrote. But, Dr. Makary, he’s saying that 40 to 45% of covid hospitalizations under the period studied — which went, as I said, to June of this year — were people who were either in the hospital for non-covid related reasons or for very mild illness. Do you buy that?

People have been saying all along the hospitalization numbers, there’s something funky going on. It doesn’t add up. Could that really be happening? If someone goes into the hospital in April of this year for cancer screening and they test positive for covid, does that go as a covid hospitalization sometimes?

DR. MAKARY: So it depends on the hospital. California had a county sort of do it wrong. They were counting everybody who just tested positive for covid — which, by the way, it’s very easy to test positive for covid with a PCR test. It will pick up one dead virus particle. So they revised in this California county, Almeda County, they revised the real numbers down by 25% when they’d looked into the cases. We are seeing hospital ICUs overrun, and those are real. I talk to doctors out there. With the hospitalization numbers, they’re probably inflated.

BUCK: And what about the numbers of those who are in the ICU who are vaccinated versus not vaccinated? Are we getting really good data on that?

DR. MAKARY: I think we are, but what they’re actually doing is when they’re saying people are in there who have been vaccinated, some of those are just incidental and some people are saying they’ve been vaccinated, and they really haven’t. So really almost everybody in the hospital with covid and very sick is an unvaccinated adult, and that’s where we should be focusing all of our efforts.

CLAY: Dr. Makary, what do you think about the idea of requiring vaccines to travel on airplanes as Dr. Fauci is talking about now?

DR. MAKARY: Almost every mandate we’ve gotten wrong as a country. When we force people to get vaccinated who already have natural immunity, we’re gonna potentially subject them to adverse side effects for no good reason —

CLAY: Let me pause you there. That’s an interesting point, before we get to the airplane. But what you just said. So we had Rand Paul on, and he was discussing, I think — and maybe Senator Ron Johnson as well, but Rand Paul obviously is a doctor and he’s gonna be on with us later this week. And when we had him on, he was talking about people who have natural immunity, the vaccine could actually make them less healthy than it would be if they just relied on that natural immunity.

How would you break that down? ‘Cause there’s a lot of people out there — I’m one of them — who have natural immunity, and I haven’t been vaccinated yet for one of those reasons. What are the risk factors from a vaccine from someone like me who still has antibodies, already had covid, recovered, feel 100% fine, and other people like me who might be out there listening?

DR. MAKARY: Well, with every subsequent dose of a vaccine, you get more of an inflammatory response. And you can consider having covid like getting two doses of the vaccine. So each subsequent dose is gonna knock you down a little bit more and cause side effects. In kids — that is, anyone under 29 — there’s actually a risk of heart inflammation with that second dose. So we don’t want those kids to get a second dose.

CLAY: Right.

DR. MAKARY: I don’t even want them to get it if they don’t have natural immunity. So that’s the complication.

BUCK: Dr. Makary, what about these comparisons that are being made now as part of the justification for the covid mandates? You’ll hear a lot of folks out there; some of them are blue check MDs, who I’m sure you’re familiar with; others are just people parroting what they see online. But they’ll say, “It’s just like the MMR vaccine,” specifically for kids having to get covid vaccination. What do you say to those who say — which, Dr. Fauci, I believe, is one of them — it’s just like measles, mumps, rubella vaccination?

DR. MAKARY: Well, I’d love to see the data on how many healthy kids have been hospitalized with covid. No one’s been able to give us those numbers. Out of the roughly 400-some kids who have died of covid out of the 25 million or so that have gotten it the entire year and a half, most of those were skewed towards death when we didn’t know how to treat them. So today, the risk to a healthy kid is infinitesimally small, and over half the kids in America have had covid. So it’s a much different landscape today than with MMR.

BUCK: If a child gets it, how dangerous are those diseases versus…? Obviously covid’s basically not dangerous. Measles, mumps, rubella, are those higher risk factors?

DR. MAKARY: Oh, yeah. We see little outbreaks of those in other countries, and they can be deadly. It’s a much different disease.

BUCK: That’s important for people to know, ’cause they’ll talk about smallpox, for example, and the vaccination campaign with that — which my understanding, Doc, is that has a 30% mortality rate, which is terrifying.

DR. MAKARY: That’s right.

CLAY: Dr. Makary, one of the things that I hear a lot about is the building on what Buck was just saying about vaccines that kids get. When I was a kid — and I don’t know how old you are, but I’m guessing you’re around Buck and mine’s age, roughly — chicken pox didn’t have a vaccine, and so just about every kid that I know got chicken pox.

In fact, we actually had chicken pox parties where a young kid would get it and you’d get sent over to try to get it as well because the idea was if you got chicken pox at an older age it was much more likely to be harmful than at a younger age. Now they have a chicken pox vaccine. I’ve never, to my knowledge, gotten the chicken pox vaccine because I had chicken pox as a kid.

Is there an analogy there for people who maybe are thinking about the natural immunity angle? No one has ever argued to me, “Hey, you need to get the chicken pox vaccine,” ’cause I would just naturally respond, “Well, I had chicken pox when I was a kid.” I know we don’t know how long natural immunity from covid lasts because this is still a novel virus in many ways.

But is there an analogy there from a natural immunity perspective that we never really said to people, “Hey, you need to get a chicken pox vaccine,” even though we have it now, if they had had it before. Is there an analogy there that makes sense to you as a doctor?

DR. MAKARY: Absolutely there’s an analogy there! It’s a direct analogy. And ironically, the CDC has on their website that if you had chicken pox, you should not get the chicken pox vaccine. It’s like they have adopted the immune system to the Democrat Party for one virus, but not for another virus. It is absolutely illogical that they’ve ignored natural immunity. It doesn’t make sense with what they’ve put out on chicken pox guidelines.

CLAY: That’s fascinating. So you’re telling… I didn’t know this. I would encourage to you write about it — and you may have written it. But if you haven’t, that would be fascinating I think for a lot of people out there to read like they have your other Wall Street Journal editorial pieces which have been so good. So the CDC is giving directly contradictory advice as it pertains to the chicken pox vaccine and covid vaccine for people who have had those viruses earlier.

DR. MAKARY: That’s right. And they cherry-pick the data to support whatever I’ve already decided. I don’t know if you saw the study they put out on natural immunity out of Kentucky.

CLAY: Yes, I read that.

DR. MAKARY: Yeah, and they said, “Oh, we did a study in Kansas. Natural immunity doesn’t work. You can’t trust it.” Well, they only looked at two months even though they have 19 months of data and they only looked at one state, even though they have 50 states of data, and it’s, “Oh, interesting. The risk is slightly higher with vaccinated immunity of getting covid,” sorry, natural immunity. They cherry-picked the data. They salami sliced it, something we call fishing in statistical techniques, that is you look for a tiny sliver of data that supports what you already believe.

BUCK: Doc, we gotta go, but I just want to know before we let you go, we’re speaking to Dr. Marty Makary. You should all check out he’s piece in the Wall Street Journal today. He’s from John Hopkins University School of Medicine. Have you…? Is it just depressing to see your field be politicized in this way? We actually all want people to be healthy and live long lives, but it feels like this is turning into some kind of a partisan food fight.

DR. MAKARY: Yeah, it is really sad. I had a patient who’s an older patient tell me he’s lived through the tuberculosis, polio, H1N1 pandemics and has never seen this degree of polarization before. So, it is a tragedy how we’re seeing medicine turned into politics by government doctors who stick to a party line rather than speaking the truth to the data.

BUCK: Dr. Makary, thanks so much for being with us. We appreciate it.

DR. MAKARY: Thanks, guys.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Biden Tries to Save Newsom by Campaigning Against Trump

14 Sep 2021

CLAY: Big day in the state of California. Prior to the time people said it would never happen, a recall election for Gavin Newsom. Well, it is happening today. If Gavin Newsom were recalled, Larry Elder would likely be the next governor of the state of California. Now, the polls, to the extent you can rely on the polls, suggest that Gavin Newsom is going to win his recall election.

But certainly the way the Democrats have mobilized makes it clear that they expect for this to be at least a somewhat challenging election. They have brought out all the big guns to campaign with Gavin Newsom all over California, including — well, they even got Joe Biden on an airplane to fly across the country, and he was in California yesterday. And Biden was saying, “Hey, if you vote for Larry Elder, you’re basically voting for Donald Trump.” Here’s Biden yesterday.

BIDEN: (whiserping) This year the leading Republican running for governor is a, uh… the closest thing to a Trump clone that I’ve ever seen in your state.

CROWD: (smattering of laughter)

BIDEN: No, I really mean it. And he’s leading the other team. He’s a clone of Donald Trump. Can you imagine him being governor of this state?

CROWD: No.

BIDEN: You can’t let that happen.

CROWD: (smattering of applause)

BIDEN: (screaming) There’s too much at stake!

BUCK: Isn’t this so classic, Clay? Because California, from a governance perspective — and I have a lot of friends, particularly in LA, but I also know a bunch of people inside San Fran — or in San Diego. I actually don’t know that many in San Fran. Even the ones who are Democrats will tell you that the state government is a total mess, that this is unsustainable.

CLAY: Yes. One-party rule is a disaster.

BUCK: It’s a disaster because there’s no impetus. There can be no accountability when you have an entire state that has effectively become a Democrat enclave, and so you just choose one Democrat or another.

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: And they’re all totally in bed with the public sector unions, and they believe in the same social justice nonsense. You really have two Californias. You have the people who live close to the coast who are very, very wealthy. The average home price in California right now is over $800,000.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Average home price!

CLAY: Yeah, I know. And a lot of those homes, by the way — this blew my mind ’cause I spent a lot of time working in L.A. with Fox Sports. So I spent months or years, just about, living in California off and on in the past several years. And, Buck, some of those houses that cost a million dollars in California, you’re like, “Yeah, I wouldn’t even to want live there.”

For people in the rest of the country who are hearing that, your mind explodes because when you hear — for most of the country — “Oh, that’s a million-dollar house,” it has a certain connotation of excellence. In California, it’s like mediocrity. It’s wild.

BUCK: It’s like a $120,000 house in Oklahoma City.

CLAY: Yeah, that’s right.

BUCK: That’s what you get for a million. Look, the problems that California has, though — and this reminds me in a lot of ways, Clay, of the Biden administration — is that there are bad things that happen, and you can draw a very clear straight line between the bad outcome and the bad decision-making rooted in the Democrat, progressive approach or the Democrat, leftist, socialist approach, right?

CLAY: Right.

BUCK: We were just talking about home prices. Why are home prices in California so high? It’s not because everyone’s moving to California and they love it so much. It’s because environmentalist lobby is very powerful in that state. I remember I was at a military base a long time ago when I was in the CIA, and they talked about how they had to create — I’m not kidding — tunnels for turtles to go under the road leading to the military base because they were worried about the tortoises that would get hit by cars going in and out of the base.

This was a huge problem. They spent millions of dollars, and then they also built these fences because the tortoises — guess what — don’t go into the tunnels; they just go for the easiest thing. This is real. I sat through a whole briefing by the general on base about this. And then they realized that when they built these little…

This was all because the California environmentalist lobby. When they built these little tunnels for tortoises and the fence along it so they would go into the tunnels, they realized that the tortoises would get stuck in the fence and then they were essentially, like, an open-air barbecue for the predatory birds that would see them.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: It was just disaster after disaster because the environmentalists were saying, “We’re gonna kill all the turtles.” That’s why you have such high home prices in California, Clay. That kind of ideology over reality is why you have rolling brownouts which are things you usually think of in the Third World. California doesn’t have enough power.

You have water shortages. You have the horrible fire problem. California could not have been more poorly managed as a state for the last 20 years, and it’s like the Democrats just keep saying, “Oh, but, you know, I’m cool.” They don’t care.

CLAY: (laughing) Well, this is the problem with one-party rule in general is that — especially when it’s Democratic one-party rule — it leads to disaster. And that’s the undergirding story here of why Gavin Newsom got recalled. It’s because every single time they have a new — first of all, the population in California dropped for the first time ever as a state, right?

I think that’s pretty significant. But I’ll tell you here in Tennessee, Buck — and I’ve had the same thing from Realtors in Florida and in Texas and other states that are seeing massive influxes of people — every time they come out with a new, crazy covid restriction, the phones blow up in all of these other states because it pertains to people…

It’s like the straw that broke the camel’s back. It’s the final little bit of detail, and that’s ultimately what’s going on here. They need someone to shake up the existing government. Look, I think we need to talk about it when we come back in this next segment, what does victory look like? One possibility, obviously, is Larry Elder wins, and that would be a political earthquake of seismic portions if that happens.

BUCK: You’re a betting man, Mr. Travis. What do you think the actual odds are on that right now? I think you’d probably get three to one odds against — and I’m Team Larry all the way. He’s a great guy, great radio host.

CLAY: I want everybody in California to go vote, but I would probably need if I were putting down money, I’d need eight or nine to one to put down money on it happening. So for people out there like, “What does eight or nine to one mean?” It means 10 to 15% chance basically of it happening, right?

BUCK: Yeah, I think that’s probably based on all the polling we’re hear. But, hey, you know, remember election night 2016 one of the greatest things of all time, what was the New York Times Hillary meter at? Was it 97% she’s gonna win or something? I still I love that.

CLAY: We don’t know how valid the polling is. We don’t know who’s actually gonna vote. We do know that they have sent as many mail-in ballots out as they possibly can, and that they are ricocheting all over the country, not just in California. There’s been lots of misaddressed ballots, and we already know — we talked about yesterday — some of the challenges of people that are actually going to vote.

But to me, one of the things to look at is, whatever the margin is, right? Because Trump lost, not surprisingly, California in 2020 by a substantial margin. But I think it’s fair to say in whatever it is now — almost a year — since November of 2020 as we come up on 10 months plus since that time, overall Democratic support has declined substantially.

So what will the numbers actually reflect in this recall vote in terms of the amount of people who can line up against Gavin Newsom? And what might that reflect about where the country is one year out from the midterms?

BUCK: This stuff is always hard, though, because you’ll see that Congress as a general proposition in terms of polling support will be about as popular as a cold sore before going on a photo shoot or something. But then you’ll find out, “Oh, but all those people like their congressman.”

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: Right? “Oh, my congressman’s cool. It’s just Congress in general.” In California, I think that any drop attributed in support overall for Newsom, people are going to — certainly the narrative from Democrats but I think this may actually be the political reality — is that it’s a lack of support for Newsom, not a repudiation of the fundamental beliefs of the Democrat Party in that state. There isn’t the New York City, Rudy Giuliani in the 1990s moment here, Clay. What happened in New York City? It got — and I was living here. I was a kid. I remember.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: It got so dirty and so dangerous —

CLAY: So bad. Yeah.

BUCK: — that people of all political persuasions were willing to say, “Enough. We just need to clean this place up. We just need…” You had black Baptist preachers who were reaching out to the Giuliani administration saying, “Let’s work together. Let’s get police more involved. We want safe communities.”

You had Latino community members, you had everybody coming together saying, “We gotta make this city safe for everybody, right? So there was a political will. In California, man? I don’t know. I think, yeah, the tent cities in Venice and the stuff that’s going on, all the heroin usage out in open air in Los Angeles on Hollywood Boulevard.

We see it, it’s gross, it’s depressing — the thefts that are occurring broad daylight. But there are a lot of libs, man, who say as long, “As I can put my #BLM square on Instagram and I live in a safe neighborhood, I don’t really care.” So we’ll see.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: How do you register your disapproval? How do you fire back in a big way right now? That’s the question we get, I bet, Buck, more than any other from our listeners. I get that question again whenever I’m out and about and I get it a ton from people in Arkansas. I’m gonna be down in Florida this weekend.

How do we get back to normal? I think it’s, one, by living your life normally. It sounds simple. But by embracing normalcy in your own life, fighting for normalcy, fighting for the things that would have seemed very simple and not outlandish before March of 2020. And one of those things is, if you’re listening to us right now in California…

It’s not only removing Gavin Newsom that counts as a win. It’s registering, I think, a massive increase in disapproval for his policies. Right? Look, Trump lost in California by around 30 points, Buck. You know, he got six million votes. Joe Biden allegedly got 11 million votes, okay? Thirty-point deficit. Imagine if we got it down — as the Republican Party did — to 10 or 12 points.

If it’s a close election for California’s sake, I think a lot of people are getting really nervous. And, by the way, Dub, who is one of our producers on the show, texted me that European books where you can bet on politics (you can’t legally bet on politics in America right now, really) it’s 10 to one basically that Newsom would lose and be removed from office.

BUCK: That sounds about right.

CLAY: About what Trump was in ’16. I mean, not a lot of difference in terms of what odds you could have gotten on Trump being elected in ’16.

BUCK: It’s so fascinating, isn’t it? Donald Trump is not running for office, is not in office. As of now, he’s not running. We don’t know. But he is not in American politics. And yet the go-to move, just to give everyone a sense of how indoctrinated and how clearly true believers in the leftist orthodoxy Californians — Democrat Californians — are, all they have to do is bring up the specter of Trump.

Somehow tie Larry Elder to Donald Trump as if these are guys with similar stories, similar backgrounds. Yeah, they have some similar ideas. But why is he the second coming of Trump or whatever? Well, because it gets all the libs scared; they’re gonna go out and vote against this. But notice there’s not actually any arguments been made that Gavin Newsom — or, for that matter, the Democrat Party of the state of California — is good at their jobs, is making it a better place to live, handles anything well.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: It’s “Trump is scary. Vote against Trump. I mean Larry Elder.” It’s pathetic.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: It’s pathetic. But this is what that state, at a political level, has been reduced to.

Recent Stories

AOC’s Met Gala Moment Defines Elite Democrat Hypocrisy

14 Sep 2021

CLAY: We begin, Buck Sexton, with rank hypocrisy in your home city of New York. Let me kind of set the scene here and you can also help me because you’ve dealt with events like this your entire life. So, I know. I’ve never bet to the Met Gala. It is a massive fundraising event that cost more than your average apartment building it feels like at times or what families will earn in a year.

It’s $250,000 for a table, $30,000 for a ticket, and people wear all sorts of outlandish outfits to this gala as they walk up the stairs at the Met which is a high-end art establishment in New York City. And AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, showed up in a white dress; in red writing it said, “Tax the rich,” and it exploded across the political landscape.

Let me play you the audio of AOC making her continuing failing attempts at political arguments. Here is AOC explaining why she went to the most exclusive and expensive event of the year, just about, in awful New York City wearing a “tax the rich” dress.

OCASIO-CORTEZ: When Laura and I were first kind of partnered we really started having a conversation about what it means to be working class women of color at the Met, and we said, “You know, we can’t just play along, but we need to break the fourth wall and challenge some of the institutions.” And… and, you know, while the Met is known for its — its spectacle, we should have a conversation about it.

BUCK: A conversation about it, Clay! That’s what she’s sparking with the “tax the rich” dress. Okay. Let’s break this thing down for a second. First of all, there was also the issue of none of the Met patrons — and it’s the Metropolitan Museum of Art, one of the most famous museums in the world. The Met steps are very, very well known. They’re in tons of movies and TV shows, and this is the most exclusive social event — generally speaking, some would say — in the world.

It raises about $10 million. I forget what the organization, the nonprofit is. But it’s really just like Vogue and Hollywood and all the fanciest people in the world go to this one party. And, Clay, the staff are all masked. The servers, the ushers, the security, they have to be masked. But the patrons, the people that are going to this ultrafancy party — this bacchanal of the most elite people in, certainly, left-wing Hollywood media society and politics you could possibly find — they don’t have to wear masks. There’s no science behind that, as we know.

CLAY: Right.

BUCK: So we start with that. They’re gallivanting around. I have a feeling — I know you asked me about this before the show — we’re not gonna have Fauci come out with, “Y’know, they were really reckless.” No, of course not. Somehow, Clay, Fauci never says anything to insult his constituency, which is the elite lib apparatus.

CLAY: He never spoke out about Obama’s birthday party. He is not gonna speak out about the Met. But yet when you go to a college football game, “Oh, Fauci says it’s unacceptable,” and to your point, the rank hypocrisy here is on multiple levels. You have the mostly poor people who are servers —

BUCK: Working class.

CLAY: — yeah, working class — who cannot afford to actually ever go to these events that are required to wear a mask. And you also require all of these kids that have now started school in New York that are going to public schools — I think a million of them — all over the city, they’re required to wear masks and now they’re gonna have to eat outdoors all through the winter? This is all madness.

BUCK: This is really Marie Antoinette, “Let them eat cake”-level stuff and as you and I know as people who like history, there’s no record of her saying it, but it’s one of those stories that’s a great story.

CLAY: It’s a great metaphor.

BUCK: Right. We love it even though Marie Antoinette never really said that and has been turned into a distant villain. Anyway, it is a “let them eat cake” moment. We’ll just go with the storyline here because in New York City, Clay, I have friends…

I just was just texting with one yesterday. They’ve got kids in the school system here, right. Remember in this city where this ultrafancy party and also people just show up. I mean, they’re dressed like clowns, the whole thing is absurd. It’s not actually aesthetically elite and people the glamour and all this stuff.

No. It’s all sort of social justice, woke bull crap and all these people pretending the people who are there are so impressive, and they’re really not. But just step back from that for a second. You have kids in New York City who are back in school; they’re still disinfecting surfaces everywhere!

CLAY: Yeah. Even though we know it doesn’t spread via surface, right? The data actually reflects that.

BUCK: There are still Plexiglas dividers in place. There’s still social distancing. They’re telling kids in New York, which is the largest public school system — obviously ’cause of population — in the whole country, they’re telling them to be prepared to eat their lunch outside for the rest of the year, which would take us deep into the winter. You’re gonna have little kids —

CLAY: Freezing.

BUCK: — freezing their butts off outside so that vaccinated, hysteric, neurotic adults who are protected by the teachers unions and therefore part of the Democrat power apparatus (sniveling), “Don’t go to bed worried at night about getting the covid from the kids ’cause the kids are little germ machines.” This is what New York City has been turned into now by the crazy libs. Where is Fauci on this one? He’s a little coward. Kind of like how he won’t come on this show even though we’ve now reached out to the White House, he’ll do every show but this show.

CLAY: Oh, yeah, of course.

BUCK: Well, I guess some conservative shows.

CLAY: Virtually every show but this one. But this is, to me, the essence of, here’s the other thing that I love and or hate about this situation in general, Buck. The media is all there covering these people as if they are heroes when, in reality, if you’re an honest media person in New York City, shouldn’t you be wondering, “Hey, how come all these super rich people can show up, not wear masks, gallivant about for a night of fun?”

And all of these kids — and, frankly, all these other places in New York, too — people can’t live their normal lives, right? And I always wonder — and I’m curious what you think about this, too — are we playing into AOC’s hands by even talking about this, right? Because the thing that’s frustrating about this is, AOC’s base is like, “Oh, it’s so brave of her to show up in a ‘tax the rich’ address. She looks fabulous. Oh, she’s fantastic.”

BUCK: Yes.

CLAY: And those people all think she’s amazing.

BUCK: No, I don’t think… To anybody who’s not a moron, she looks like a moron. That’s the reality. Now, you’re never going to reach the idiots on the left who think that AOC, whatever it is… I mean, she could walk into a room, trip and fall and get up and they would say that it was balletic and amazing and she’s a genius.

It doesn’t matter, right? But if we’re talking… There are two groups, Clay, that by pointing out being at the most elite social gathering — and when I say “elite,” it’s elitism. I’m not impressed by these people. I don’t like these people. I don’t want to be one. I went to the White House, which is many levels of celebrity coolness below… You know, they call it “nerd prom,” but they mean, “Oh, we’re actually so special.”

CLAY: White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

BUCK: No. They’re actually just jokes. But I went when I first started in media a decade ago, I said, “I’m never going back to this thing. It’s appalling.” Now, of course, a lot of conservatives won’t go because we’ve seen the way that they just rip on Republicans and the whole thing. But, Clay, with AOC, we’re speaking to everyone who listens to this show —

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: Everyone who lives in reality and sees things for what they are. We need to remind them that this is who is lecturing you about how you need to pay higher taxes and America is so racist and people who are at the top of the power structure who are luxuriating in their trip to the Met Gala and the Hamptons and their private jet travel and flying around in helicopters and getting seven-figure book deals for books that no one’s going to read, never mind buy.

And they want to lecture all the rest of us about how awful we are. We need to tell the people that see this for what it is, “You’re right. You’re not the crazy ones,” and then, to your point that you often make, those who are still open to having their minds persuaded, they need — ’cause this is a blunder. This is a… What was it, Talleyrand?

“This is worse than a mistake; it’s a blunder,” or “It’s worse than an error; it’s a blunder.” That’s what this is. She looks utterly buffoonish. And I’m sorry. The most powerful voice in the Democrat Party right now is certainly not Joe Biden. It’s probably AOC when you’re talking about at least the ability to direct the media narrative. And she’s just not smart, Clay. She’s just not very smart. I guess people don’t care.

CLAY: Yeah, I think that’s true too. What do you think she is thinking as she wakes up this morning and today?

BUCK: That she’s amazing and she’s fighting for working-class people by wearing a multi-thousand-dollar gown.

CLAY: Yeah. I just think, do you think she thinks that her “tax the rich” dress was a wild success?

BUCK: Mmmmmm. See, I at some point, what you see with her is also this melding of a politician that is also a celebrity, right?

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: It used to be politicians become celebrities. She’s really like a celebrity who is a politician now. I know she got into politics first and that’s how she made her name.

CLAY: I think it’s an interesting perspective, right?

BUCK: Yeah, I mean, she —

CLAY: How cognizant is she of what people think about her and does it in any way matter? Because celebrities, it really doesn’t, right? The reason why you wear a ridiculous dress to the Met is so people will talk about you.

BUCK: Attention.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: There is, because of her involvement in actual policy discussions — and she does wield a vote in Congress and does have actual government power at some level and a taxpayer-funded staff and all the rest of it — she’s supposed to at least stay within some bounds of intelligence and normalcy in what she’s doing and what she’s saying.

But I think that what she does here is a perfect distillation of the hypocrisy and the sanctimoniousness that are really the defining characteristics of the modern elitist Democrat. This is who they are, the, “We’re social justice warriors in fancy gowns at the Met Ggala who are gonna go hang out afterwards with Clooney and Jay-Z. This is who we are as elite Democrats. But we care so much about the power.”

Not enough to support police or there are fewer shootings so fewer working-class people get shot or to keep schools open during the pandemic while they were send their kids to private school. Clay, in every socialist society, in every communist society, there’s this kind of grotesque stratification of those at the top pretending they care about those below.

Not saying we’re creating meritocracy, not saying that the laws apply equal to everybody. No, no, we have to be at the very top because we’re the revolutionary arm! We’re the vanguard of the progressivism here, and we need some perks. We need some fancy gowns at the Met gala. This is the Democrat Party, right? You’re seeing it right now.

CLAY: I absolutely loved it when I saw it last night on social media. And I was just trying to think what the Nancy Pelosis and the people who were trying to appeal to moderate Democrats, ’cause we need to talk about the budget, which is taxing the rich — that’s their plan — and what impact of that’s gonna be, but how much of a distraction is she amid all of this.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

BUCK: My man Clay and I talking here about the Democrat hypocrisy. But remember, folks, we have to point it out, but it won’t change because it’s not a bug; it’s a feature. Of course, they’re hypocrites! “What are you gonna do about it, peasant?” That’s their attitude. They pretend to care about the poor while they spend all their time with the rich and trying to become very rich themselves.

It is, in fact, those who are striving, those who want the right to rise who get caught in the vise grip of Democrat tax raises, spending, all the stuff that we’re seeing right now. We know there’s a basic certainty: Democrats are in charge; they’re gonna take more money from people who are working for it. And that’s why you get the latest update here on who’s gonna be paying the taxes?

AOC wears her “tax the rich” thing. This may come as a shock to her, although she makes plenty of money; so she’s probably paying a reasonably high tax rate. And she’s not yet at that Pelosi level where the taxes don’t matter because, remember, they don’t tax wealth; they tax earnings.

It’s people that are trying to build — people in their peak earning years, who after 10 or 15 years are finally getting into those top income brackets for a period of time. They’re the ones the government’s always piling on. They don’t go after the people who inherited a billion dollars that are sitting on it, or Nancy Pelosi’s super-rich husband. Find me a prominent Democrat in Congress who talks about taxes.

Bernie Sanders is a millionaire! America is a country where we’re constantly being lectured by socialist millionaires. That’s pretty much all you need to know. Meanwhile, Democrats want to tax more of our income in general. The top individual tax rate’s supposed to rise. It’s gone to the Ways and Means Committee, but this is what the bill is gonna look like here: 39.6%, up from 37%.

The higher tax rate will kick in at $400,000 for individuals. That’s down from $523,600 for individuals. There’s more all over the place. I mean, they’re raising the corporate tax. Clay, who pays the taxes in this country? It’s actually the people who are the demonized so-called rich!

CLAY: Yes. Here’s the data.

BUCK: By the way, you make $400,000 in New York City, you’re not even close to rich.

CLAY: The bottom 50% of income earners, the bottom 50% pay 3% of all the federal income taxes in the United States. Think about that for a minute. Half of Americans pay just 3% of the overall. And then you compare that with the top 1%. The top 1% in the United States pays 40% of all federal income tax.

So the top 1% by themselves pay nearly more than the bottom 50% combined right now. And the top two earning brackets — the top 5% of earners — pay 60% of all federal income taxes. So, this is a pretty significant amount that they are already paying going forward. So, “tax the rich,” AOC? You got your wish. It’s already happening.

Recent Stories

When Jane Fonda Tried (and Failed) to Counter Rush on Radio

14 Sep 2021

Be sure to listen daily to Rush’s Timeless Wisdom podcast here or on iHeartRadio. It’s absolutely essential information from America’s Forever Anchorman.

Recent Stories

On Hannity, Clay Discusses F— Biden Chants in Football

14 Sep 2021

Clay breaks down the meaning he sees in young college students and football fans who are the heart of America, chanting against President Biden and his attempts to lock us all in our basements.

Watch It Here:

Recent Stories

Buck Talks Vaccine Mandates on Fox News Primetime

14 Sep 2021

Buck appeared on Fox News Primetime to discuss how the Democrats will use covid to gather new power and use it to curtail a wide range of our freedoms.

Watch It Here:

Recent Stories

EIB 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Stack of Stuff

14 Sep 2021

  • Wall Street Journal: Covid Confusion at the CDC, Decisions on boosters relied on data from Israel. Why isn’t the U.S. producing this research? – Dr. Marty Makary
  • National Pulse: COUP: General Milley Secretly Pledged to Warn Chinese Communist Party if Trump Planned a Strike
  • Federalist: Treason? Gen. Milley Undermined Trump White House With Secret Calls, Promising To Alert China Of Potential U.S. Attacks
  • New York Post: White House livestream cuts Biden mid-sentence as he goes off script
  • Washington Examiner: California recall election: Everything you need to know
  • Breitbart: Brian Mast Excoriates Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Afghanistan: ‘We Don’t Need to Hear Lies’
  • Daily Wire: AOC Mocked, Criticized After Wearing ‘Tax The Rich’ Dress To Elitist Met Gala, Branded A ‘Fraud’
  • Federalist: AOC Dons ‘Tax The Rich’ Dress To Party With The 1 Percent At $30,000-Per-Person Celebrity Bash
  • National Review: Why Did the Staff at the Met Wear Masks, While the Celebrities Went Without?
  • New York Post: Dems’ shameless, pointless Ground Zero act
  • PJ Media: Conservatives Are Now Counter-Culture: True Liberalism Is Dead and Antifa Is Pure Establishment
  • Daily Wire: Fifteen More Arrested For January 6 Capitol Riot As Internet Sleuths Tell On Acquaintances
  • National Pulse: Half of America Says Jan 6 Protesters are ‘Persecuted, Political Prisoners’
  • Breitbart: Amnesty Alert: Bill ‘Blows Away All Numerical Limits’ on Employer-Based Green Cards — for an Entire Decade

  • FOXNews: More kids shot in Chicago than have died of COVID-19 across US this year
  • Daily Wire: Chicago Shootings Continue: 64 People Shot, At Least 9 Dead In Weekend Violence
  • Gateway Pundit: Nothing to See in Israel with COVID, Please Move Along
  • Americans for Tax Reform: Dems Propose $3 Trillion Tax Hike on Working Families and Small Businesses
  • New York Post: Democrats’ tax hikes would slam economy and hurt the working class
  • National Review: Nancy Pelosi’s $3.5 Trillion Tax-Hike Plan, Explained
  • CNBC: Top earning New Yorkers could face 61.2% combined tax rate under House plan, Californians may face 59% rate
  • Daily Caller: Blinken Left Stammering As Rep. Perry Presses Him On Alleged FBI Interview About Hunter Biden
  • New York Post: America’s high-tech tyranny is far more sophisticated than Putin’s crude autocracy
  • PJ Media: ‘New York Times’ Quietly Removes Claim That Hunter Biden Laptop Story Was ‘Unsubstantiated’

  • Recent Stories

    What to Look for in the California Recall Results

    13 Sep 2021

    CLAY: A lot going on this week in terms of politics. Maybe the most significant thing is the recall election. I say “maybe” because Congress is also back in session, and there are major decisions being made about what the Bernie budget is going to look like, how massive the tax increases are going to be, how many trillions of dollars more our federal government is going to outlay.

    All of those things are being debated right now. But I think there’s an important story going on in California as it pertains to the Gavin Newsom recall effort, and also the rise of Larry Elder as the alternative to Gavin Newsom. Now, it’s worth mentioning: The state of California in 2020, Donald Trump lost to Joe Biden.

    I believe the number was 63 to 37. So we’re talking about a deep blue state in California but there is so much angst, there is so much anger over the way that Gavin Newsom has handled covid. Over the fact that many of you who are listening to us right now in California, your kids were out of school for all of last year, remote learning.

    The parks were closed down. They took rims off basketball courts. They filled in skate parks. They told you you couldn’t go to the beach. They arrested a paddleboarder out on the ocean in one of the extreme examples that went viral of California’s covid insanity. I don’t want to get too excited, Buck, about the idea of Gavin Newsom getting recalled.

    Although I want to encourage all of you — and we’re gonna talk about this in the third hour — to make sure that you get out and vote for Gavin Newsom to be recalled in California, even though there are already, it appears, some shady shenanigans surrounding the recall vote. We’ll play some of that for you maybe in the third hour.

    But I do think that even if Gavin Newsom isn’t recalled, the number to pay attention to is what the total vote to recall him is. I think you’re gonna see, Buck, a massive shift overall in the amount of people who voted against Donald Trump but are now going to vote in favor of the recall, maybe at minimum, a seven- or eight-point swing which is gonna be ominous to Democrats because California is their base; it is their deep blue bastion. If they’re in danger there, a lot of these swing states, a lot of these swing districts, major issues at play.

    BUCK: Okay. So the polls show that he’s probably going to stay, unfortunately, which is annoying. But we’re hoping everyone turns out and votes and he loses and our friend Larry Elder would then most likely become governor, because you don’t have to get… You just have to be the next best option after the governor gets 50% of the vote in the recall situation.

    So it would be great if Larry Elder became the next governor of California. Clay, to your point about how the numbers are likely or could play out in your prediction that we’ll see, certainly Newsom has lost support over the last year. That’s why this is happening. It’s a question of how much.

    Whether that, though, translates into the Democrats feeling like their national party and congressional midterm prospects are in jeopardy for Gavin Newsom dining at French Laundry where there are photos being taken right after he shut down the rest of the restaurants in the whole state is…

    My problem with the way California Democrats think — and it’s true of New York Democrats, too — is it’s never the ideas and the policies that have backfired so miserably. It’s always the person implementing them, right? It’s like, “Actual Newsomism, if you will, has never been tried.” That’s what it turns into, or actual Democrat policy hasn’t been tried. It’s Gavin Newsom.

    CLAY: “We haven’t gone Dem hard enough. That’s the problem!”

    BUCK: Exactly. They haven’t had a big enough, progressive enough state. But this is interesting. This was up on IndependentChronicle.com. “California Republicans told they ‘already voted’ when showing up to cast recall ballots.” This is from local media picked up by IndependentChronicle.com.

    “Voters in the San Fernando Valley claim they were told they already voted in the gubernatorial recall election even though they had not. ‘I went to El Camino High School to vote…and she said, ‘You voted.’ I said, “No, I haven’t.” And she said, ‘This has been happening all morning.”‘ 88-year-old recall voter Estelle Bender told local media after finding out that someone voted in her name. Bender said she filled out a provisional ballot and ‘left really angry.'”

    Clay we’re gonna have to watch this one very closely. I think that’s for sure.

    CLAY: Well, and, Buck, first of all, if this is happening everywhere, we know that the fix is in based on the number of mail ballots that went out, right? We’re still allowing primarily vote by mail. That woman actually went into her precinct to cast a vote and told that reporter that they had her down as already voting.

    They’ve issued a statement and said that these people filed provisional ballots. But what she said is where she lives in Orange County, it was happening all to the Republican voters who were going in, certainly Orange County is still a bastion in many ways of California conservatism. That’s why a lot of people flee L.A. County and move further south into Orange County.

    This is, I think, something that is very, very significant. One of the issues with corruption, Buck… This is one of the things you learn in law school. It’s not only the corruption itself. It’s the appearance of impropriety, right, because it destroys the underlying faith in the action itself. And oftentimes, we try to protect not only from impropriety but appearance of impropriety.

    Is there anybody out there who doubts now that our elections are significantly tinged with impropriety on a massive scale? I don’t think there’s a single person out there listening to us. When we look like a banana republic, and it takes weeks to figure out what the vote’s gonna be in Georgia or Arizona or Pennsylvania —

    BUCK: Clay, there is an answer to this. You asked is anyone…? It always depends on the outcome, right? You have Democrats that tell you that any election they win the cleanest, fairest, best election imaginable. And any election they lose, magically — it’s amazing how this happens — was stolen by the Russians. “The Kremlin was hiding under their bed and some guy named Yuri was manufacturing votes for Trump!” That’s what they say.

    CLAY: That’s why Florida, by the way, believe it or not — even with the craziness there — they fixed things after 2000, Buck. We knew immediately in Florida what the results were. These states are still a mess, and California is, too.

    BUCK: They become a model for other states, but somehow also, Clay, Democrats always like — in Democrat states — very few safeguards and very messy elections.

    CLAY: Lots of mail-in ballots. Probably a coincidence.

    BUCK: You can say I’m a coincide theorist, but I think there’s something funky going on there.

    Recent Stories

    Bill Maher Blasts the NFL’s Black National Anthem

    13 Sep 2021

    CLAY: We were talking about this earlier. I took my son. He wanted to go for his birthday to the Titans game. I understand there are people out there that say, “Why would you support any form of sports, including the NFL, when they allow protests, when they are being disrespectful?” I thought, by and large, the NFL on September 12th was very respectful of September 11th.

    There was not the black national anthem played at the game that I went to. But it was played on the opening Thursday night, and Bill Maher talked about this. Bill Maher increasingly is willing to attack the absurdity of left-wing ideals, and he’s doing so in an intelligent fashion. We want to play this for you.

    MAHER: When people say to me sometimes, “Like, boy, you go after the left a lot these days. Why?” I’m like, “Because you’re embarrassing me!”

    AUDIENCE: (laughter) (smattering of applause)

    MAHER: That’s why I’m going after the left in a way I never did before, because you’re inverting things that I… I’m not going to give up on being liberal. This is what these teachers are talking about, that you’re taking children and making them hyperaware of race in a way they wouldn’t otherwise be.

    I mean, I saw last night on the football game, Alicia Keyes sang Lift Every Voice and Sing which now I hear is called “the black national anthem.” Maybe we should get rid of our national anthem, but I think we should have one national anthem. I think when you go down a road where you’re having two different national anthems…

    Colleges sometimes now have — many of them have — different graduation ceremonies for black and white, separate dorms. This is what I mean. Segregation. You’ve inverted the idea! We’re going back to that under a different name.

    CLAY: He’s 100% right. We used to have fun with this because I think the only way you can win on issues like these is by ridiculing the absurdity. We would have, Buck, on our show we would play the Hispanic, the white, the black, and the Asian national anthem. We also had the gay national anthem and the women’s national anthem to draw into it. Yeah. It was fun. We had callers call in.

    BUCK: Are those real? Those exist?

    CLAY: We picked them.

    BUCK: Okay. (laughing)

    CLAY: We did it in a comedic skit.

    BUCK: I didn’t mean I didn’t know there was a, quote, “black national anthem” until pretty recently, so I had to have the possibility that there were these others.

    CLAY: We did it in a comedic fashion. For instance, white people drafted Sweet Caroline as the white national anthem.

    BUCK: You could have — I don’t know — Living on a Prayer, maybe?

    CLAY: Oh, that’s a good one too. I need to get that audio sent to us so that we can ridicule this. But it points to his larger issue, which is the entire point of the national anthem is that it brings us all together. Once you start excluding people based on race — or doing different treatment based on race — that’s called racism, which is really what the left is doing now.

    BUCK: It’s not defensible, really. Intellectually, the things that are happening now that the left is pushing, it always devolves into incoherence which is why they respond to it with so much anger and accusations.

    CLAY: That’s right.

    BUCK: They don’t try to convince you about why this is a good thing. They say, “It is. Shut up. You’re racist.”

    Recent Stories

    Biden Killed Aid Worker, Not Terrorists in Afghanistan

    13 Sep 2021

    BUCK: Right now, up on Capitol Hill, you got Blinken, Secretary of State Blinken about to be grilled — that’s the term we all have to use, “grilled” — for the Afghan exit debacle. But remember, Democrats have been telling everybody for the last couple of weeks, “It was actually a stroke of brilliance by Biden. He’s a hero! He’s amazing!”

    One thing that I want to spend a little more time on, if not today, soon, did the Biden administration…? Because, Clay, I went on Fox right after the horrible suicide bombing incident that killed 13 of our American Marines and Navy corpsmen, and Biden had claimed that the people that did this to us were going to be held to account right away.

    I said, “Look, I was a CIA officer; I know how this stuff goes. Finding who was responsible directly and stopping the next attack would certainly be something that would require tremendous intelligence capability that you tend not to have in a chaotic withdrawal situation when all of your tools, sources, and methods are going to be working in a frenzied state.

    “People on the ground aren’t gonna be able to provide the same kind of information.” Sure enough, now we’re told that maybe a Hellfire missile strike that was supposed to be stopping the next big suicide attack may have killed an aid worker. This is from the New York Times, Clay: It may have killed an aid worker and, I believe, nine family members.

    CLAY: That’s right.

    BUCK: Including seven children. This, I find entirely tragically plausible because there was a political imperative ’cause Biden looked like an idiot, and everyone knew it, and they couldn’t hide from it, and we’d just lost 13 Americans. So the Biden administration decides, “We just gotta go for it! We gotta hit a target. We gotta make sure we stop the next attack and look like we’re tough.”

    So they had two strikes, actually. One was, I think, eastern Afghanistan (again, unnamed individuals as if we’re supposed to take their word for it that these were the masterminds) and then a strike that they said was at the incoming suicide bomber, the next big suicide bomb that was gonna go off at the airport.

    Now it looks like they blew up… We don’t know for sure, but a New York Times detailed analysis — with video and travel time stamps — shows a guy who had never been on the radar before of the U.S. government. He seems to be an aid worker, and definitely had a bunch of kids with him, and they blew him up. If it were the Trump presidency and this occurred, this specific incident, I am certain this would be getting not just scrutiny. There’d be outrage over this.

    CLAY: No doubt, and I give credit to the New York Times for writing the piece and actually being willing to look at all the evidence. And, by the way, it came out on Friday. I bet we’ll be one of the only media outlets in the country to mention it on Monday. I will say even in the world that we live in now… When you drop a story on Friday afternoon headed into a weekend, it used to be the tried-and-true way to bury bad news.

    But when you’ve got all the different activities that are going on a Saturday and a Sunday, by Monday that story is almost vanished. I mean, that’s just the truth of the world that we live in. But it is indicative of the overall failure of the Biden regime.

    Every direction that you turn, they are failing. And that’s why he’s out there desperately campaigning today for Governor Newsom because he’s trying to avoid losing an ally. He already lost one ally in New York. He’s trying to avoid Newsom being tied to the fails covid policies of the Biden administration.

    BUCK: It’s too hard to make the case that you lose the governors of your two biggest, most important blue states during covid — when states were so important in the response, right? Especially if you believe that Trump — as Democrats do — was so MIA, which is not true, and Operation Warp Speed is all of a sudden erased from the memory banks of all these people.

    But it’s very hard to make the case to anyone who’s open-minded and paying attention, at least, that the Democrats — in the most important states — did a good job with covid when you’re losing allies. I know that for Cuomo it’s for sexual harassment, but you’re losing both of your most important governors from a state and electoral perspective.

    And on the Afghanistan thing, the narrative right now would be — if Donald Trump were president and you had the same fact pattern through the month of August and the same situation played out in Afghanistan up to this drone strike with a Hellfire missile on a carload full of people. It would have been, “Donald Trump, to distract from how awful he is, he blew up a carload full of children! That’s what a monster he is.”

    You hear nothing like this about the current commander-in-chief. I know people say, “Oh, the intel community, the military.” Yeah, but when there’s pressure from the White House do anything to stop this and you have the order to go the first moment you think you know when the first attack is?

    This kind of stuff happens — and, you know, the buck stops with the commander-in-chief on this, right? This is the kind of incident that would be treated very different. Anyway, I didn’t want us to go without mentioning that at least.

    CLAY: No, because most media are not gonna mention it by Monday because the story came out on Friday and then it’s gone.

    BUCK: It just goes to the desperation of the Biden administration as well to look less absurd in the face of all the Afghanistan lack of planning and the debacle of people running on the tarmac and trying to get people out of there. By the way, we’ve got “Blinken faces furious lawmakers over Afghan exit.”

    That’s, right now, the headline on Fox News as Capitol Hill testimony is happening. I’m just gonna skip to the end on this for everybody. Nobody in the Biden administration is getting fired. If they resign, it will be months after they’ve gotten their book deal from some big publisher and they’ve got the Council on Foreign Relations giving them a nice little sinecure or whatever.

    That’s what happens. No one’s gonna be held accountable. So all the histrionics you’re gonna hear on Capitol Hill right now from whoever it is on the Republican side about, “Oh, my gosh. And why didn’t you plan and why didn’t you…?” You know what the Democrats are doing? They’re looking at them and saying, “Yeah, what are you gonna do about it? We’re gonna be talking about the insurrection for the next 12 months! What are you gonna do about it?” That’s their approach.

    CLAY: Well, and also the Blinken discussion arguably provides cover for the budget details that are continuing to come out that we talked about earlier where suddenly people in New York are paying an over 60% tax rate. And people are not focused on that because the outrage over Afghanistan or whatever the latest daily news cycle is obscures the larger, more complete trillion-dollar Bernie budget that is moving through that is going to screw, I think, the economy.

    Recent Stories