×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Still Waiting for Fauci’s Answer on Natural Immunity

20 Sep 2021

FAUCI: Not yet, Chuck, we don’t. We’re following that, but not yet. We do know that when you do get infected, you get strong immunity. (sputters) There’s no doubt about that. The durability is unclear. There’s another fact we know that if you do get infected and recover and get vaccinated, the level of your immunity is extraordinarily high, surpassing any of the other two-dose vaccines that you get.

BUCK: The Clay and Buck show here. Clay, there we had “The Fauch” doing the usual dance on TV. He’s saying, “We don’t know…” That was about natural immunity, something you and I have been pushing here, and every doc that I know who listens to this show that’s reached out on this issue has said essentially with one voice, “Thank you for bringing up this thing that the administration was pretending didn’t matter until about five minutes ago, because it’s reckless and it’s wrong and it’s not about science.

“It’s about Politics and Policy making for the Democrat Party.” But Fauci is saying we don’t know how long natural immunity lasts. So that’s kind of thing — and then, “We know that the vaccine on top of natural immunity makes things so much better.” Okay, first of all, they don’t know how long the vaccine lasts. That is for sure. And also, okay, how much better?

Is it reasonable to make people that have natural immunity get the shot so they could have, what, maybe an additional 5% or 10%? I mean, how much additional protection do they have? They don’t know, Clay — and if they did know we would know because there would be numbers and real data attached to some of this, and there’s not.

CLAY: Yeah, and I think focusing on not knowing how much natural immunity lasts, on Friday we played a clip from last year of Fauci saying that if it’s like any other virus, the natural immunity would last a really long time. But also we know, as we pointed out Friday, that the vaccine doesn’t last very long. So trying to undercut the idea of natural immunity by saying, “We know it doesn’t last very long,” or “We don’t know how long it lasts,” is defeating the entire purpose, right?

I mean, it’s hard to come up with any other idea than they think it undercuts the idea of vaccination. ‘Cause, remember, we’re at 76% of adults have had at least one shot now. And they keep saying the unvaccinated are the other 24%. I think there’s probably a pretty substantial portion of that 24% that’s already had covid.

So what percentage of people — and this is the data we should have that we don’t have that they have in England, for instance. What percentage of people now in America, Buck, have form sort of covid antibody immunity here, either from the vaccine or natural? It’s gotta be over 90%.

BUCK: What’s gonna happen… Just remember this is another Buck prediction for the future. What’s going to happen is eventually caseload will be very low, there won’t be the same level of outbreaks. This assuming there’s not antibody-dependent enhancement and new variants and all kinds of crazy things. But I try to be as optimistic as I can under the crazy circumstances we have here.

But at some point, we will have so much natural and durable immunity in the population overall from people just getting infected over the course of about two years of this thing — and viruses historically often have about a two-year life cycle of spread, the same strain of virus throughout a community — then they’ll say, “See? All of our mitigation, all of our shots, all of our masking, it finally worked.”

And at that point, some people say, “Hold on a second. It finally worked? If 250 million people out of 330 got infected with covid, is that really intervention and mitigation working, ’cause that seems like an interesting way to look at it.” So that’s what I think is gonna happen — and also, Clay, nothing is perfect.

I mean, if you do a little bit of deep diving on this you find out really quickly, not only can chicken pox come back — and it often does his does when people are older with weakened immune systems — as shingles, you can actually get the chicken pox again. It can happen. It’s very, very rare. But does anyone surround who’s had chicken pox worry about being the one in a million that gets a second case of chicken pox?

CLAY: Not only that, Buck, as was pointed out to us, the CDC actually specifically recommends that you don’t need to get a chicken pox vaccine if you had chicken pox before.

BUCK: Right.

CLAY: Meaning there’s a huge percentage of our listenership out there who are either older than us or… I don’t know. When did the chicken pox vaccine start to really get widely distributed? If you’re probably 25 years old, you might have a gotten the chicken pox vaccine. But I bet if you’re 30 or 35, you probably didn’t. I know we didn’t have it when I was young.

I’m 42, and you didn’t have it when you were a kid; so the vast majority, I would imagine, of our listenership had chicken pox at some point in their life, never got the vaccine. So why does the CDC recommend if you had covid you need to get a vaccine, but the exact opposite for chicken pox? Doesn’t make any sense.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

AOC’s Tax the Rich Dress Designer Owes Back Taxes!

20 Sep 2021

BUCK: AOC’s “tax the rich” dress got a lot of attention last week, right? We were all watching this play out where she shows up at the Met gala and you got everybody who is on her side of course saying, “Oh, my gosh! She’s so chic, she’s so avant-garde, she’s so spreading zee message!”

CLAY: That’s a heck of an accent there.

BUCK: Fancy, fancy. All this sort of stuff, Clay. And we said, “Hold on a second. You’re at a $30,000-a-ticket event, $250,000 a table; you are someone who drives around in a new Tesla, lives in a fancy apartment building,” I have friends who know where, “in D.C., and you’re talking about taxing the rich as though that’s some big statement?” It turns out that the woman who designed her dress knows something or perhaps doesn’t know enough about taxes.

Designer Aurora James, who came up with the “tax the rich” dress, according to Fox Business here, she has an LLC. I’ll get the short and sweet here. “The company racked up three open tax warrants in New York state for failing to withhold income taxes from employees’ paychecks totaling $14,798…

“The company has been hit with 15 warrants in total since 2015,” and the IRS “placed six federal liens on Cultural Brokerage Agency totaling $103,220.” A hundred thousand dollars in unpaid taxes from the fancy dress-designing LLC. I’m just wondering. Maybe you’re not the person that would be the first you’d think of to be pointing the finger about taxes need to be paid.

CLAY: Over a hundred K in unpaid back taxes for the woman who designed AOC’s “tax the rich” dress. The hypocrisy and the irony and the absurdity of all of this, you keep expecting for it to end. I will say on the one hand, it is totally unexpected for you to be able to do research, probably. Although AOC’s staff should know who she’s a consulting with. But I’m sure she probably doesn’t know that she owes a hundred thousand dollars in back taxes, AOC herself. But imagine being the dress designer. She has to know that she owes back taxes, right?

BUCK: This is kind of like the mask thing when people are hypothetical. When they go party without the masks on, I want them to be able to party without masks on.

CLAY: Yeah, right.

BUCK: And I think the IRS is a monstrosity and harasses people, and the tax code is intentionally opaque to benefit certain interests and all that. But if you’re gonna lecture people about it, you’d think you’d find somebody who wouldn’t necessarily have this specific baggage.

CLAY: Pretty big skeleton in the closet.

BUCK: Yeah, and it’s just class warfare rhetoric, the problem… It’s really just, folks, it comes down to very basic human emotions here. Class warfare stuff works because people either are exploiting envy of those who are upset about others doing well or there are a lot of very well-off people who are very insecure about that accumulation, whether they inherited it or they feel like they exploited people to get there, whatever it may be, and they think by mouthing the preferred slogans of Marxism — while they’re at the Met gala — they buy themselves some social insurance.

CLAY: This is where every time I look at the tax code, I think more and more about how right Steve Forbes was back in the day when he ran on the concept of a flat tax.

BUCK: Absolutely correct.

CLAY: We just all pay off a postcard. Everybody knows what they make; you pay 15% of it. I think it was 15% flat tax. I was talking about this with my wife the other night, as we have gotten older and as our taxes have become more complicated. People have this idea that taxes are easy. You could go to 10 different tax accountants, I would right now, and they would give me 10 different numbers that I owe the IRS at the end of the year. It’s not just me. There’s lots of people like me. It’s a total joke.

Recent Stories

Manchin and Sinema Stymie Democrats on Spending

20 Sep 2021

CLAY: I wanted to hit this as we start off the second hour of the program, I actually saw of all people CNN put this out, Buck. So we just talked as we finished the first hour about the strike in Afghanistan that killed an innocent man and seven children. That news came out on Friday. But as we are sitting here on Monday morning getting ready for what should be this pursuit of the $3.5 trillion budget plan, the infrastructure bill, and everything else, I want you to listen to all of the things right now that are confronting Joe Biden and his administration, okay? So, this is a significant deal, Buck, ’cause we had talked about it a lot. What was the Senate parliamentarian going to rule as it pertained to trying to make citizenship for eight million illegals?

BUCK: Right. They’re making it a budgetary bill. The Democrats pretended that amnesty for about eight million people was a budgetary matter; therefore, they should be able to squeak it by through the reconciliation parliamentary trick and not actually even have real legislation passed by the United States Congress that would legalize a group of people the size of the entirety of New York City. That’s what they were trying to do.

CLAY: Yes. So that gets shot down. Okay? This is a big deal, I am told, by people who follow foreign policy significantly; and it’s certainly a big deal because Biden said, “Hey, we’re gonna the adults back in the White House.” They somehow upset France so badly that France has pulled all of its ambassadors and representatives out of the United States, something that’s never occurred before, because we didn’t include them in some sort of submarine pact with Australia and England.

You’ve got over 12,000 people, illegal immigrants under the bridge in Del Rio, Texas. We mentioned the drone strike that killed 10 innocent people, including seven children. The FDA panel, Buck, rejects the idea of booster shots by a massive magnitude, which Biden had made one of the foremost components of his goals to get covid under control.

Joe Manchin is saying that he doesn’t want to have a vote at all now on the $3.5 trillion budget this year, is the latest news. Kyrsten Sinema has come out and said she doesn’t support the drug plan. You can’t even get budget reconciliation if you don’t have at least 50 votes.

And there is now a debt ceiling battle which also threatens whether or not this infrastructure bill can be passed. That is all disastrous for Joe Biden. Buck, I was sitting looking at this list, and I was thinking over the weekend, and I thought I would hit you with this question: Can you name anything that’s going well for Joe Biden right now?

BUCK: No. This is what we’ve been saying. It’s felt this way for the last couple of months. Now, we both think the Biden administration is just one long, I’d say, comedy-of-errors — more like tragedy of errors — but it’s one long series of missteps and blunders. But lately — especially because of what we’ve seen with the changes in covid policy, the big surges in covid numbers that have occurred this past summer — there’s not even talking points to deploy — they don’t even really exist — about the successes of the Biden administration.

What you really have in many ways mirrors what you saw in California, where Gavin Newsom was able to rally Democrats to his side by pretending that Donald Trump is on the ballot. This is what they point to which is also why over the weekend, Clay, they reinstalled fences and there are all these riot police deployed in Washington D.C.

CLAY: Oh, yeah. There were more media than there were protesters.

BUCK: There were more journos from Politico and the Washington Post, it seemed, than there were actual protesters for the people are being held and have been held in solitary confinement for months, in many cases for nonviolent crimes that amount to obstructing a government process from January 6th or perhaps destruction of property. And yet that was a big focus of the media over the weekend.

Clay, there is nothing they can say about the Biden administration that looks positive right now. And if, as you point out, the reconciliation bill does not become a massive, “We just shoehorn everything into this, get whatever we want, spend like there’s no tomorrow” — which is kind of what they’re doing — then the Biden agenda turns into what in year one going into year two? What do they put on the scoreboard?

Really, you and I are pretty good as finding different ways to argue different points of view. If someone said right now, “Buck, you’re the new Jen Psaki,” which…

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: That would be interesting. How would you position Biden’s first year, I almost can’t make fun of her for saying things — you know, for making it about Trump or babbling nonsense about things, because it’s like there is a point at which even a great defense attorney doesn’t have much to work with with a client. Year one Biden administration is a client that’s going away for a long time.

CLAY: I’ll tell you what they’re gonna try to spin. And this news just came down, by the way. The Supreme Court is going to hear the Mississippi abortion case on December 1st. So I think what they’re going to do is the same playbook that Gavin Newsom ran: Orange Man Bad and they’re going to take away abortion rights.

They’re going to lean heavily on that as their calling card going into 2022. And if Manchin holds back and actually sticks to his guns and they don’t do this massive budget for 2022 or wait until 2022, then I think the only argument Biden will have is, “Hey, we have to have more support in order to enact or agenda.”

BUCK: What about Sinema? You’re giving Manchin all this credit. Sinema has come out swinging today.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: They’re both obviously in this position where they could play spoiler, and they both benefit from that given the realities, the political realities in their respective states of Arizona and West Virginia.

But Sinema’s basically said, “If you guys play any games…” This was just today in Politico Playbook. “If you play any games with the…” Here’s what’s happening. The far-left Democrats in the House are saying, “We’re going to nuke the infrastructure bill in an effort to try to get more of what we want in the overall spending bill.”

CLAY: And just to reset for everybody out there, the infrastructure bill passed the Senate, and they haven’t allowed it to be voted on in the House because the idea was, once infrastructure happens, then senators, like Sinema and Manchin are just gonna be like, “Peace out. We’re not involved in this $3.5 trillion.” So the progressive…

This was the whole battle over with these were connected or independent bills that Biden had to try to clean up after he said he wouldn’t sign one if the other one wasn’t passed. So this is rearing its ugly head, just to kind of set the tone there.

BUCK: And Sinema is saying if Pelosi… Well, really it’s AOC, The Squad, and the progressive caucus in the Democrat House. If they play any games, though, with this process as it has been promised by Pelosi so far, that she will then not play ball going forward on the overall spending bill.

CLAY: So everything could collapse.

BUCK: Everything could go down on this one if she holds firm. Look, it’s also kind of amazing that we’re acting like an additional trillion dollars or $2 trillion of spending is —

CLAY: Is a failure.

BUCK: — fiscal sanity, given that we spend $6 trillion over the course of covid that we weren’t anticipating. But the Biden agenda, all the other things they’re trying to shoehorn into the massive bill, Clay, that’s the stuff. First of all, there should be just straight-up legislation for, but they’re hoping to find ways to put it into reconciliation.

Some parts — famously, some parts — of Obamacare got through via the reconciliation maneuver, which people felt like was a huge abuse, especially for a massive new entitlement, et cetera. But I don’t… Do you think Manchin and Sinema hold strong on this one?

CLAY: I do. I do. And we’ll talk about this some, but all of it tied together, Joe Biden’s presidency is on the ropes.

BUCK: It’s only year one, though, man. It’s only year one. They got a lot of lies to tell in year two and a lot of Orange Man Bad fearmongering. I’m with you, but I wish we were having an election in —

CLAY: Right now.

BUCK: — 60 days.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: Whatever it is. November. I’m not doing the math in my head right now. I wish we were having an election in November because it would be a political bloodbath for the Democrats.

CLAY: It would be like 1994.

BUCK: A year we’ll have to see.

Recent Stories

Milley Lied About Afghanistan Drone Strike

20 Sep 2021

CLAY: We talked on Friday about how we weren’t going to let it pass that the United States government had mistakenly killed a completely innocent man and seven of his family members, even though most people in media are not even gonna mention this by Monday, which is why they dropped the news on Friday. We want to give you a flashback. Milley has done an awful job as a general, period. But here he is lying to the American people on September 1st about the August 29th U.S. drone strike in Afghanistan. All these, it turns out now, were lies. Listen.

MILLEY: All of the engagement criteria were being met. We went through the same level of rigor that we’ve done for years, and we took a strike. Secondly, is we know that there were secondary explosions. Because there were secondary explosions, there’s a reasonable conclusion to be made that there was explosives in that vehicle. The third thing is we know from a variety of other means that at least one of those people that was killed was a ISIS facilitator.

So, were there others killed? Yes. There are others killed. Who they are? We don’t know. We’ll try to sort through all that. But we believe that the procedures at this point — I don’t want to influence the outcome of an investigation, but at this point — we think that the procedures were correctly followed and it was a righteous strike.

CLAY: It was not “a righteous strike,” Buck.

BUCK: A horrifying thing to hear in retrospect. And, Clay, as one who was in the CIA and understand when he’s talking about criteria for these kinds of things and the intelligence involved to make sure you are sure, it is appalling that at this level, they would have been so wrong. Note that he said secondary explosions.

That did not happen. There were jugs of water which do not explode, as far as I know, jugs of water, and then the obviously the overconfidence about the ISISK facilitator. But anyone who knew the situation on the ground from having had experience in Afghanistan and with the intel apparatus before would have said: In the midst of all the chaos — the airport, the frenzy, the Taliban checkpoint — we were somehow going to be able to pick out the one ISIS facilitator who was the one guy who’s packing his car full of explosives?”

The truth is we were reliant, Clay — almost entirely, really — on Taliban checkpoints preventing a second round of strikes like this. We did not have the intel network, obviously, to know the difference here. And why this is so significant, I think — beyond the loss of 10 lives, including seven children, which is horrifying — is that I think this is a circumstance where Joe Biden felt like the White House looked weak, and they felt like they had been disrespected. And they wanted to take a shot at someone to show how tough they were. And they blew up a car with seven kids in it. That’s what this looks like.

CLAY: I think that’s what it was, and then Milley lied to this about this. And I think what it calls into which as well is this idea, Buck, that we’re gonna have any ability to stop terrorists in Afghanistan from reclaiming that territory and planning and plotting for the next attacks, because we can’t even manage this attack when we still have a lot of people there and still had some eyes, theoretically, on the ground. Seven innocent kids we killed.

And to me it emboldens our adversaries over how much of a failure Biden and his administration is. But it’s just… They tried to bury this story, Buck, on Friday. They knew that most people by Monday would have turned the page; there’d be new stories to follow. But I want to make sure that we don’t forget what they did, because I think you hit it. This was Joe Biden feeling like he needed to send a message about how big and strong and tough he still was after the incompetence and the ineptitude of our withdrawal from Afghanistan. And as a result, 10 innocent people are dead.

BUCK: Clay, this kind of decision — the trigger pull on this — went up to a very high level, folks.

CLAY: No doubt.

BUCK: This is not just, “Oh, we’re in the midst of a war and all these things.” No, no, no. They said they had drone on it for hours, and you have to look at the political consideration that would have come from the top here to not look weak for the Biden, to not look feckless and did that…? Do I think that they fired this off knowing that it was 10 innocent people?

No. Do I think they did this and put the preponderance, so to speak, of the evidence too much on the side of, “We’ve gotta take action here because we have to look decisive and strong”? Yes, and I think that just goes to show the kind of political shading that comes into play for a Biden administration that looks wildly incompetent not just on the Afghan withdrawal but on so many issues right now.

And I mean, all you have to do is think about if Donald Trump had just had a bad week of foreign policy blunders, Clay, and then his administration — because the buck does stop with the president, his administration — blew up a car with 10 people, seven kids inside. Not only would this be wall-to-wall news coverage, they would impeach him over this. They would say this is a war crime. That’s what the Democrats would do.

Recent Stories

Buck Has an Interesting Theory on Boosters

20 Sep 2021

CLAY: We said on Friday, if you were listening to the show… The Afghanistan news about us killing an innocent civilian and seven children among 10 people who were killed came out right as we were preparing to finish the Friday show. And what did we say, Buck? We said a lot of times you get even still these news dumps on Friday afternoons headed into a weekend because there’s the hope that they aren’t going to linger by the time you get to Monday.

So in short order we got that news and were able to talk about it on the show. And then you had an announcement of an Australia-and-England partnership designed to help with submarines and stand up to China, and France pulls its ambassador out. I don’t really care what the French ambassador does, Buck. But it does directly fly in the face of the argument of the Biden administration that we’re gonna be the adults.

We’re not gonna have uncomfortable relationships with our top allies. And this an unprecedented move, the likes of which it would lead newscasts forever if France was upset with Trump. So that happens, and then Joe Biden, a couple of weeks ago, made a major statement — you may remember it — about how everybody who got the vaccine was gonna get boosters eight months after their last vaccine.

And every adult, every kid — theoretically everybody — was gonna be getting this thing. And then the FDA actually steps up and shoots down the booster requirement for most adults. And, Buck, they did it by a massive magnitude. I’ve seen two different reports. It was either 16-2 or 16-3 that they voted against a vaccine booster mandate for everyone.

And so, again, we talked about Gottlieb saying the science was effectively made up as it pertains to six feet. You heard the mayor of San Francisco, London Breed, acknowledging that she just didn’t feel like wearing her mask ’cause she was having a good time. And it’s amazing. It’s honest, probably, but it’s amazing. And then you have Joe Biden, who has said, “I’m gonna solve covid” and Dr. Fauci. They were telling everybody they need to get boosters — and boom! What happens, Buck? It completely gets shot down.

BUCK: It’s almost like they’re making judgment calls and they’ve been making judgment calls all along. Meaning that they look at different variables, numbers, uncertain data; having to balance out different priorities and freedoms and equities you could say to look at all this stuff together and they’re using their judgment.

But the whole time they have been pretending that it is a matter of fact when in fact it is a matter of what they decide, what they want to do. And you see this now with the boosters in a very clear example. My theory — and we can spend a little more time on where this is going, Clay.

CLAY: Yeah, I want to hear your theory.

BUCK: I don’t think boosters are not happening. I think this is gonna be something similar to what we saw with J&J. This is the temporary pause to create the illusion of reasonableness from the apparatus of control before they decide in a month, maybe sixty days, “Oh, just kidding. You actually are all going to need boosters.”

CLAY: I wonder if they’re hoping that the case numbers are gonna go down and people just forget all about the boosters.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

BUCK: On CNN right now you have the headline: Pfizer vaccine safe for children 5 to 11 — and well tolerated. I just want everyone to be paying attention close attention here because what you are seeing is, “Oh, the boosters! The FDA is backing off on the boosters being recommended,” which, remember, the recommendation always turns into a mandate, right? They recommend you do the following, and very quickly state —

CLAY: If enough people don’t do it, it turns into a mandate.

BUCK: Right. So it’s “an offer you can’t refuse,” to borrow from Don Corleone. You better do this or else. And they’re gonna do this with boosters I believe in time although Clay’s point I believe is well taken and correct, that if we happen to see, as Fauci would call it, “a diminution of cases,” also in cases “going down…” Fauci loves that word. Listen for it; you’ll hear it.

If there’s “a diminution.” But if the cases go down into the wintertime for whatever reason — I think it’s unlikely, but if that happens — maybe you won’t get boosters. If we get a surge (another Fauci word) we’re gonna be seeing boosters. But right now, Clay, they’re trying to convince everybody that 6- and 7- and 8-year-olds — we did the numbers before —

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: — are needing to get this shot in their arms. Reminder, folks, this is not going to be like the initial days of the vaccine for adults where it was, “We don’t want mandates. No, no.” Once the FDA approves Pfizer for your 6-year-old, it’s gonna be, “You can’t go to day care or…” I don’t know when kids start school because I don’t have any yet. Working on it. But you know —

CLAY: You’re a long way, hopefully, from having kids. (laughing)

BUCK: I gotta get married first. I’m working on it. I’m on the path. So, anyway, point here being, Clay, they’re gonna be telling you if you’re gonna have your kid, your 8-year-old, your 9-year-old in school, the kid’s gotta get the shot and they’re already saying it’s just like MMR. And here’s Fauci just ever remember is on the booster flip-flop.

FAUCI: No, I… (sputtering) What I was saying, my own personal looking at this, again, just because I look at the data and say I would do it this way, that’s the reason why we have qualified groups of people who together as a committee examine all the data and make a decision. So I have no problem at all with their decision. The thing that I’m saying is that data will continue to come in, and I believe you’re gonna see an evolution of this process as we go on in the next several weeks to months.

CLAY: It’s important to note, Buck, this wasn’t like some close decision. Right now, they voted — and again, I’ve seen it reported two different ways — 16-3 or 16-2 against recommending boosters. If I got destroyed like that by a group of my peers after I had gone public like Fauci had and said, “Hey, the data is all clear; everybody has to get a booster,” and then all these other scientists looked at it and voted against me 16-2 or 16-3, I’d feel like I got smacked down pretty significantly.

BUCK: Let’s think about this one for a second though, Clay. How is it even remotely feasible that they can know efficacy and risk profile of booster shots that until a couple of months ago, they were pretending there was no way we were going to need.

CLAY: They were not necessary.

BUCK: It’s just… You don’t have to be… This goes back to knowing people are lying to you, knowing when something smells funky. You and I have smelled that funky smell from the very beginning of covid from people like Fauci. Right? We’ve known that something was up. When they tell you they could know both the need for and safety of booster shots, they were extrapolating. Notice how Fauci also makes a pretty big admission here.

He says, “We’re looking at the different data, all the different numbers and coming to a conclusion.” Rooms full of bureaucrats like the one he’s talking about are making determinations. And then, Clay, they act like it’s the equivalent for a Catholic of the pope speaking ex cathedra, as, “This is the word of God from on high to all of you, and it is forever true and is irrevocable. ” That’s just not accurate at all about these prognostications about boosters, which we know because Biden weeks ago was saying (impression), “You’re getting boosters.”

CLAY: I also want to point out, as I think it’s significant, if only two or three people are supporting the idea of boosters, this also lets you know that Fauci is not a mainstream advocate. He’s far on the side of more treatment, right? If there are almost 20 different “experts” (and we put experts in quotations) looking at this data and making a determination and the vast majority of them are making the opposite recommendation from what Dr. Fauci is saying?

Do we really want an activist in terms of covid policy that’s way in front of where everybody in the country should be, and then when we get lectured by the Blue Checkmark Brigade for not following the science, isn’t Fauci himself not following the science if they’re all repudiating his advice?

BUCK: Well, there’s also an admission here — which you rarely get — that these are judgment calls, that they are balancing out different interests and risk factors and numbers, and there is a lot of unknowns. People used to make fun of the Rumsfeld “known unknowns,” “unknowns unknowns.”

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: It’s actually a pretty good framework for understanding certain problem sets. Because what you don’t know you don’t know can often be the thing that’s the biggest problem — which, by the way, I think we’ve seen with some of the vaccination stuff here. Here, though, is the NIH director — ’cause these guys are starting to feel the heat.

If you are a person who is capable of thinking for yourself, you have, at a minimum, enormous questions about Fauci’s credibility and others around him. The head of the CDC, for example, Walensky. The head of the NIH here stepping out to say so, “Meh, if you want certainty, go to China.” This is what they’re actually saying now.

DR. FRANCIS COLLINS: We’ll have to see what they say ultimately about the youngest individuals because of concerns about benefits and risks. But I will be surprised if boosters are not recommended for people under 65 going forward in the next few weeks. But we’ll wait and see. You know, Chris, what you’re seeing here is science playing out in a very transparent way. This is the way it ought to be!

I’m a little troubled that people are complaining that the process isn’t working for them. The process is to look at the data, have the experts consider it, and then make their best judgment at that point, recognizing that the judgments may change. If people want an absolutely authoritative statement about here’s the right answer, well, that’s not what our country is all about. (snickering) Move to China. You’ll get it there.

BUCK: What a smug jackass, Clay. This guy runs the National Institutes of Health!

CLAY: Also, there isn’t a consensus from science, either. And I understand his argument there; science is messy. But he’s pushing against the idea of science being messy by saying everybody has to make the exact same decision when we tell you to make the decision, right? Science is messy.

If you listen to Dr. Ioannidis, if you listen to Dr. Makary, if you listen to the Great Barrington Declaration individuals — if you listened, frankly, to so many doctors that you and I talk to, Buck, who agree with a lot of what we say but don’t feel like they have the freedom to speak out and say what they believe — there is an authoritarian bent here.

Science has stifled anyone who is a dissenter and not allowed them to speak out, which, frankly, is why I was so surprised that the FDA made recommendations that they did and spoke out against the recommendations of Dr. Fauci so significantly, because they were clearly trying to pressure them to make a choice. That’s what Berenson told us on Friday. So can you imagine if Trump had gotten that far out in front of where the FDA was and basically tried to bully them into making a decision about boosters like this?

BUCK: But I think the initial point that you’ve made, Clay, to me, and that we’ve been talking about on air today whereby they have to keep some in the toolkit.

CLAY: Something in reserve.

BUCK: Because, remember, that’s what got all this started. You had a lot of public health experts who were sitting on these multibillion-dollar budgets who were unwilling to come forward and say, “Honestly, there’s not much we can do. A lot of people are gonna get this. Do your best. Try to stay healthy, stay away from sick people, and Godspeed.”

They could have said that, or they could have done a focused-protection plan by going for the data showing that the elderly 65 and up, 75 and up were particularly vulnerable. It’s really 75-and-up as you see from the death chart that people 75-, 85-plus is where you have a big spike in the mortality rate here so that’s where you should focus to protect from the virus more than anybody else.

But, Clay, Glenn Greenwald — a man firmly of the left. I don’t know if you saw. I just shared this on Twitter. I wanted to share it with everybody else. In response to the 2021 Emmys where everyone’s maskless indoors and it’s all, “Oh, look at us! We’re glitzy and glamorous and fancy — sophisticated, vaccinated, and fancy.”

CLAY: (chuckles) Yes.

BUCK: Greenwald tweeted this. He wrote the following: “You can say it every day and it still won’t be enough: The liberal discourse and policymaking around covid has no relationship whatsoever to science. It has a lot to do with culture, politics, hierarchy, psychology, and control. But science and health are totally absent,” end quote.

That’s like a mantra of this show now for the months that we’ve been on. This is not about health. This is not driven primarily by keeping you safe, folks. This is about controlling you and political power through the lens of covid intervention and mitigation.

CLAY: Yeah, and when we come back, I want to play the audio of San Francisco mayor London Breed for everybody out there who may not have heard it yet because if you’ll remember last Friday, we pointed out that she had been caught indoors violating her own mask mandate as, by the way, everyone at the Emmys was.

But when you actually hear her defending that decision, you are going to finally say, “We’ve reached the point where basically people who are Democrats can just say, ‘Hey, we’ll do whatever we want and not even try and defend the hypocrisy.'” I want you to hear this audio when we come back. But first what you got for us, Buck?

BUCK: Yeah. I think her defense boils down to extending one finger in the direction —

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: — of those of us who don’t like the hypocrisy. That’s really the defense.

Recent Stories

Rush Describes a Night With the People Who Make the Country Work

20 Sep 2021

Be sure to listen daily to Rush’s Timeless Wisdom podcast here or on iHeartRadio. It’s absolutely essential information from America’s Forever Anchorman.

Recent Stories

EIB 24/7: Clay & Buck’s Stack of Stuff

20 Sep 2021

  • Daily Wire: Emmys Go Maskless, Get Blasted: ‘Masking Is Solely Reserved For Us Peasants’
  • Daily Caller: Florida Fans Sing Tom Petty’s Famous Song ‘I Won’t Back Down’ In A Packed Stadium Against Alabama
  • Breitbart: Children Going to Hospital with Mental Health Problems Jumps 50 Per Cent Since Start of Pandemic: Report
  • Breitbart: Fearful London: Falls Soar as People Scared of Catching Covid from Handrails
  • New York Post: Pfizer says its COVID vaccine is safe and effective for kids ages 5-11
  • PJ Media: Is the FDA COVID-19 Booster Shot Fiasco the Beginning of the End of ‘Faucism’?
  • HotAir: Maskless San Fran mayor: “We don’t need the Fun Police”

  • Breitbart: Haitian Camp Crisis Brings Chaos to Two Small Cities on Texas-Mexico Border
  • New York Post: Elon Musk mocks Biden after SpaceX completes first all-civilian flight
  • Daily Wire: As Everything Melts Down, Biden Hits The Beach, Goes For A Bike Ride
  • Daily Wire: ISIS Suicide Bomber Who Murdered 13 U.S. Troops Was Freed From Bagram Prison After Biden Withdrawal, Indian Media Claims
  • Federalist: Democrats Plan Tax Giveaway To The Rich, Bailout To Blue States
  • Gateway Pundit: What? New England Journal of Medicine Backtracks – Now Admits COVID Vax May Not Be Safe for Pregnant Women
  • ZeroHedge: Senate Parliamentarian Kills Democrat Bid To Shoehorn 8 Million Green Cards Into $3.5T Spending Bill
  • HotAir: Hong Kong is holding a “patriots only” election today
  • The Hill: Gottlieb: ‘Nobody knows’ origins of six-foot social-distancing recommendation

  • Recent Stories

    Biden Withholds Monoclonal Antibodies from Red States

    17 Sep 2021

    BUCK: Here’s what’s happening in Florida. If you look at the case numbers, it’s on the other side of the slope. One thing that we have seen about the covid-19 virus all along is that it is seasonal. There are surges; there are declines. This has happened across the country. You heard a lot more about the surge in Texas and Florida this summer — warmer states — which mirrors what happened in the past.

    Remember the Sunbelt surge of 2020? It mirrors what we’ve seen in the past. And of course, that was before any vaccinations had happened in the summer of 2020. But you didn’t hear about Oregon or Hawaii which are hitting all-time highs in cases, and there’s a lot of concern about what’s really happening here. Questions should be asked, like, “How long does the vaccine really give effective protection?”

    They admit it’s not forever, not even close. It’s six months. Is it more like three or four months? We’ll dive into some of that. But monoclonal antibodies. Clay, remember when monoclonal antibodies were a story that Governor Ron DeSantis was being attacked for in Florida because they said he had some kind of a donor or financial interest?

    Meanwhile, everyone agrees that monoclonal antibodies are helpful. Doesn’t mean… It’s not a silver bullet. It’s not a panacea. They’re helpful in treating people who are very sick. Well, all of a sudden… That story, by the way, of a financial interest was total crap. All of a sudden now, people are wondering what the heck was going on. The federal government has stepped in to cut monoclonal antibodies by half.

    Here is Newsmax reporter Emerald Robinson asking Psaki about this.

    ROBINSON: He promised on September 9th that he was going to send 50% more supply of monoclonal antibodies to states. Yet the Biden administration is cutting supplies in red states by 50%. So, for example, you know, in Florida, they were expecting to get 70,000 doses this week, which they say they need. They’re only getting 30,000 doses. And this is not just for unvaccinated people. In South Florida, half the people who are seeking this treatment are fully vaccinated. So why is the Biden administration cutting these supplies?

    BUCK: Clay, can I just tell you, I’ve gotten confirmation that is happening. Why?

    CLAY: Yes. It’s a great question. By the way, Buck, I’m in Florida. So as we get ready for the big Alabama-Florida game, I’m down in Jacksonville right now doing the show. And look, I live in Tennessee so it’s not in any way a shock to me. But it is interesting how wide open Florida is and the red states are. Let me give you some data, ’cause you were talking about.

    Florida cases — this is according to the New York Times — are down 41% in the last two weeks. To your point on the peak having been reached, we are rapidly approaching the number of infections being down 50%. Hospitalizations are plummeting too. Now, let’s talk about these monoclonal antibodies — and I’m sure, I mispronounced that.

    BUCK: Monoclonal, yeah.

    CLAY: Monoclonal. Why it’s so significant. Because as we talked about yesterday, the people who are needing this are roughly 50% vaccinated and 50% unvaccinated. Why does that matter? Because we have been told basically since the vaccine started, Buck, that if you can’t… Remember what they initially told us was if you got vaccinated, you didn’t have to wear a mask, you would never die of covid.

    You would be basically unable to ever be hospitalized, and you would be… Remember, they told us this. You would be unable to really get or spread the virus. That’s what they told us about the vaccine from the get-go, right? As we are continuing to look at the data — and this is where I would say our show has been among the most forward thinking and honest of anyone in media.

    Because look, you and I both wish that this vaccine had been so successful that it led to a Covid Zero universe. That is 100% not true. And already, looking at many things that Dr. Fauci and Rochelle Walensky, the CDC director, said, much of what they said is untrue and factually proven to be untrue now.

    So the fact that there are a lot of people out there who are nervous about covid — both vaccinated and unvaccinated — is supported by data. But this is significant. Ron DeSantis, they have moved — and this is important. This is really important, and I want everybody to listen closely.

    They have moved, with these monoclonal antibodies, Buck, from saying, “Oh, this is junk science that Ron DeSantis and Florida people are practicing,” to now recognizing how successful these treatments are and restricting those treatments to the state of Florida.

    And let me just say this, ’cause this is important too. They are basically acknowledging one more time that Ron DeSantis and Florida are correct. And this is also… I want everybody to listen closely. Remember in the early days of the pandemic when your home city of New York was overrun and most of the rest of the country back in March of 2020 was pretty fine?

    If you went and watched the White House press briefings, the media would show up, Buck, and they would drill Donald Trump on whether there were gonna be enough ventilators. “Are we gonna have enough ventilators? Are we going to have to ration ventilators? Are people going to die because they can’t get ventilators?” And we built all of these ventilators, and we didn’t ration the ventilators, right? We overloaded New York with ventilators.

    BUCK: There was no need for the rationing.

    CLAY: Right.

     

    BUCK: But right now, there is a demand for rationing, Clay, from the federal government. They have stepped in to take over the supply of monoclonal antibodies. You have to wonder what the heck is going on here. And we have a version of it. And that word that should terrify anybody who’s aware of social justice lunacy on the left: “equity,” right?

    “Equity” is a fancy way of saying, “We do what we want and say that it’s fair.” Here is Jen Psaki. We had Emerald Robinson of Newsmax ask the question. Here is Jen Psaki saying, “Oh, we’re not cutting access to antibodies for states like Florida. We’re doing it in a more ‘equitable’ fashion.”

    PSAKI: That’s not accurate. First of all, we are increasing our distribution this month by 50%. In early August, we were distributing an average of a hundred thousand doses per week. Now we’re shipping an average of 150,000 doses per week. But over the last month, given the rise in cases due to the Delta variant — and the lower number of vaccination rates in some of these states like Florida, like Texas — just seven states are making up 70% of the orders. Our supply is not unlimited, and we believe it should be equitable. … Our role as the government overseeing the entire country is to be equitable in how we distribute. We’re not going to give a greater percentage to Florida over Oklahoma.

    BUCK: Listen to the maniacal reliance here on “equitable.” What does it even mean? If there are more cases in certain states, you need to get them more monoclonal antibodies! Clay, two theories here. I want to know which one you think is more likely or if you got a third, by all means. Florida is being punished by the federal government because now they know, “Uh-oh!

    “The Northeast, we’re gonna start having cases rising up here and the whole Florida-is-the-bad-guy storyline goes away.” So they want to punish Florida — which means, by the way, people are gonna die because of the federal government decision — and/or they want to hoard them for some of the blue states that are now in their seasonal upswing. They know it’s coming.

    CLAY: I think it could be both, Buck, and what I want to build on that. Imagine if Donald Trump had said, “We’re not gonna send enough ventilators to New York to satisfy the demand because we want to make sure that we take care of red states, which may have a demand in the future.” To me, anybody logical out there would say, “You send the treatment where the demand is most significant because that is where the most lives can be saved and or assisted right now.”

    And I think both of your strategies are true. I think, one, it’s a punishment. I think they need for Ron DeSantis to be the villain to Joe Biden’s hero. That’s what they’re trying to set up, and anything that can make him or the state of Florida… You heard her specifically reference Florida and Texas. Greg Abbott and Ron DeSantis are the villains, and I also think the Biden administration is afraid now that they know this.

    Remember, initially they were saying, “Oh, this treatment is lunacy. It doesn’t make any sense.” They now see that it works, and what they’re afraid of, Buck, is as the blue states — all over the Midwest you’re starting to see this tick up; all over the Northeast, Vermont — which is like 88% vaccinated — covid skyrocketing in the number of cases that they have.

    Joe Biden doesn’t want to disappoint his blue state brethren if they don’t have enough of this treatment. He doesn’t want to be the bad guy. It’s amazing how quickly this has moved from, “It’s an irrational treatment,” to, “Let’s make sure — thanks to the experiment that we’ve seen in Florida — that we have enough of this for our blue state brethren.”

    BUCK: There’s no way that they can explain away a surge in the blue states this winter. It’s not possible. They’re finally backed into a corner here. If you see surging caseloads in New York, they’re gonna try to say, “Oh, but there’s still some unvaccinated people.” I’m sorry.

    CLAY: It doesn’t pan out.

    BUCK: We’ve been told this too many times. It doesn’t wash. We all know this is bull. They told us they figured it out. They know what’s going on. Clay, I think there’s a real anxiety at the very top level of the government. I think in the Oval Office, I think Biden and the people around him that actually make the decisions are thinking, “How will we explain it to the American people if there’s some rush for boosters, which may very well be coming in the wintertime?

    “When we’ve told them that we did the right things, we figured this out, and it was those dumb red states over the summer that didn’t know what they were doing.” And, by the way, they were underplaying monoclonal antibody treatment when it was effective for attacking DeSantis, when the medical community has always been clear on, it is useful.

    It’s not a silver bullet, but it is useful. This is not like oh, people say vitamin C or zinc or something. You know, that’s always good for your immune system. But the point is, they were playing politics it with it, and I don’t think they have a way out of it. But Ron DeSantis, by the way, we should come back to. He wants to fight back on this.

    CLAY: Yeah, he wants to fight back on it. And, Buck, I think we need to hit the data again. And I think we also need to point out that all Florida schools are back in session, and we were told, “Oh, my God. If these kids go back to school and they’re not wearing masks, the cases are gonna skyrocket.”

    The exact opposite has happened as Florida has returned, which also threatens the story that the Biden administration wants to tell. It’s a big deal, and this is a significant, clarion case that challenges much of what they have been arguing for a long time.

    BREAK TRANSCRIPT

    CLAY: I am in the great state of Florida right now doing my show live from Jacksonville. And I’m proud to be in this state because it is one of the states in the nation where a governor is actually standing up for freedom. And Ron DeSantis is willing to fight for the people of Florida and stand up to the Biden administration.

    When it feels like so many are just rolling over and acquiescing meekly to whatever the unconstitutional demands and mandates are from this administration. Here is Ron DeSantis saying he’s going to fight against this idea of taking away the monoclonal antibodies that are saving lives in the state of Florida right now.

    DESANTIS: We’re facing a massive, massive cut in monoclonal antibody treatments abruptly. Just after the president said they would have a 50% increase, we’re now seeing more than a 50% cut for the state of Florida. So we’re gonna fight like hell to make sure that our folks get what they need.

    BUCK: Can we just say, Clay, that in one month’s time the Democrat corporate media has gone from, “Ron DeSantis is reckless for promoting monoclonal antibodies and lining his pockets…” Just like they did, by the way, with the vaccines. So another lie from CBS News on that, which fortunately got blown away by DeSantis. But now they’re actually going not just in the direction of monoclonal antibodies are good. They’re trying to hoard them for other places. What does “equitable” contribution between if not “we get it to the places with the sick people’?

    CLAY: You’re exactly right. The way that the federal government should be behaving is to shift resources to the places that need them the most. And the idea that you would ridicule Ron DeSantis for monoclonal antibodies and then suddenly — when you recognize how successful they are suddenly — shifting and taking away Florida’s ability to treat its people?

    Now, the positive is here — and I want to keep hammering this home. It’s probably the only place you’re gonna be hear it. Cases are plummeting in Florida. And to your point, Buck, we saw this last summer. The Florida, the South in general, has their main — at least so far, based on the data we have, has their main — pop in the summer earlier than other parts of the country.

    BUCK: Their summer surge is over. And, Clay, to the data, it’s migrating north.

    CLAY: Yes. Yes. Yes.

    BUCK: We’re seeing exactly that. D.C. is actually getting hit pretty rough right now with caseloads. So is West Virginia. Oregon is still hit hard. Some parts of Nevada are getting hit pretty hard. Once this spreads out to the bluest of the blue, which is likely to happen, that’s gonna be an interesting conversation for the Biden administration to have.

    CLAY: A massively interesting conversation because what you’re seeing right now is the overall tide, the surge, is moving into the Midwest, right? Look at the numbers in Ohio. I know we got a lot of listeners in Ohio. It’s likely to hit Ohio and Michigan and then spread on into Wisconsin and Minnesota, all the Big Ten states.

    BUCK: I think our friend Alex Berenson told us this would happen about a month ago. Remember that? And it is happening.

    Recent Stories

    Then and Now: Dr. Fauci Changed His Tune on Natural Immunity

    17 Sep 2021

    CLAY: I was just telling Buck off the air, there’s a lot of shows that get nervous when they talk about things that go against the prevailing consensus media opinion. And what we’re doing is we’re looking at the data and saying, “We were told that once the vaccinations started…” Fauci himself said, “Hey, once we get to 50%, we’ll never see surges again,” and here we are sitting at 76%, I think is the most recent data, of people 18 and up.

    It’s 74% of people 12 and up, and we are still seeing record numbers in states all over the country of covid cases. What’s going on? And a big part of this is the shifting of goalposts, the changing of stories, and my wife actually suggested this. She said, “Hey, you know what?

    “I remember a while back when Dr. Fauci said that natural immunity was likely to be the pathway out of covid and that people who got covid and recovered from it were very likely to be fine.” I had the crew here… I said, “You know what? I kind of vaguely remember that too.” I had the crew here go back and look into the mists of covid history.

    We know Dr. Fauci has basically said everything. This goes all the way back to March the 26th, 2020, okay? So March of last year, Dr. Fauci was asked on Comedy Central’s The Daily Show, “Do we know yet if getting coronavirus and surviving it means you’re immune to the disease?” This was a question that was being asked very early on.

    “What happens with natural immunity?” Here was Dr. Fauci’s answer in March of 2020, and then I want to play you very much of the same question that he was recently asked on CNN, and let’s discuss the differences. First, this is The Daily Show on Comedy Central, as I said, March of 2020.

    FAUCI: We don’t know that for 100% certain ’cause we haven’t done the study to see rechallenges, whether they’ve been protected. But I feel really confident that if this virus acts like every other virus that we know, once you get infected, get better, clear the virus, that you’ll have immunity that will protect you against reinfection. So it’s never a hundred percent, but I’d be willing to bet anything that people who recover are really protected against reinfection.

    CLAY: All right. That’s Fauci. He said, “I’d be willing to bet anything” that people who are infected “are really protected against reinfection.” That was Dr. Fauci in March of 2020. Now, I want you to listen to what he told Sanjay Gupta last week on CNN when Sanjay Gupta pointed out, “Hey, wait a minute. Israeli data says people who are naturally infected have 27 times the protection rate — according to that Israeli data — as people who have vaccinated immunity.”

    Here is what Dr. Fauci said just last week. I want you to consider the difference here and ask, why is he telling a fundamentally different story now?

    GUPTA: There was a study that came out of Israel about natural immunity and basically the headline was that natural immunity provides a lot of protection, even better than the vaccines alone. What are people to make of that? So as we talk about vaccine mandates, there are… I get calls all the time; people say, “I’ve already had covid, I’m protected, and now the study says maybe even more protected than the vaccine alone. Should they also get the vaccine?” How do you make the case for them?

    FAUCI: You know, that’s a really good point, Sanjay. I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that. That’s something that we’re gonna have to discuss regarding the durability of the response. The one thing the paper from Israel didn’t tell you is whether or not as high as the protection is with natural infection, what’s the durability compared to the durability of the vaccine?

    So it is conceivable that you got infected, you’re protected. But you may not be protected for an indefinite period of time. So I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously, because you very appropriately pointed out, it is an issue, and there could be an argument for saying what you said.

    BUCK: I can translate this, Clay. I speak Fauci. Can we get into this for a second here? What would it look like, what would it mean if after this whole vaccination push that we’ve had, it came out and became clear that they ignored, as they have, natural immunity the whole time, all under the premise that, “Well, of course the vaccine is better than natural immunity!” That’s what they were saying in the early days.

    Ninety-five percent protection. “We don’t know. We can’t tell you about the natural immunity.” But the vaccine immunity, which also — I want to be that guy, Clay, but there’s tens of billions of dollars at stake here for certain very powerful interests. I don’t say that’s everything. I do think that if Big Pharma could cure this tomorrow, as long as they got tens of billions of dollars, I think they’d be willing to do it.

    But I see here Fauci doing what he always does, which is he tailors the message. I know he’s at NIAD, which is part of the NIH. Everybody thinks he’s at CDC. But he tailors the federal health bureaucracy message so that it will not upset the sensibilities of Democrat Biden voters. He changes based upon, “What do I need to say at this point ’cause I don’t want to upset the CNN audience.” And, by the way, this was all Clay had recollection — actually it was Mrs. Clay who remembered.

    CLAY: Laura Travis was thinking about it. And think about this, Buck. He said in March of 2020 that he would bet anything that natural immunity was long lasting. That was his actual words: “I’d bet anything.” As a gambling man, “I’d bet anything” means you’re pretty confidence in the side that you are taking, and now he has pivoted. Nineteen months later he says, first of all, I don’t know the answer to this question which. By the way, you had 19 months to figure out the answer. That’s a pretty glaring flaw in the first place.

    BUCK: And when you look at this also, his fallback became, oh, but we don’t know how long… Okay, natural immunity, the Israel data shows there’s good protection. We don’t know —

    CLAY: Seven hundred thousand people they studied, by the way.

    BUCK: We don’t know how long that lasts, though, is what he says.

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: Well, “isn’t that ironic, don’t you think”?

    CLAY: Yes. (laughing)

    BUCK: A little nineties reference. We miss the nineties, Clay and I.

    CLAY: Alanis Morissette is definitely nodding along.

    BUCK: Indeed. Because they obviously didn’t know how long the vaccine immunity lasted, Clay, and that didn’t stop them. They obviously had no idea.

    CLAY: And what’s crazy is, we now know that the vaccine doesn’t last very long. That’s why he’s advocating for boosters. So if you’re arguing, “Hey, well, maybe I’m gonna take the opposite side from what I said back in March when I was saying I’d bet anything that it’s long lasting when you recover based on my entire career of understanding virology.

    “How in the world, when you know that the vaccine is of limited duration, do you downplay natural immunity for any reason, Buck, other than — I would say — twofold. One, it undercuts the administration’s argument that everybody on the planet has to be vaccinated — and, two — there are, as you said, tens of billions of dollars at stake because natural immunity doesn’t get Moderna and Pfizer and all of the Big Pharma companies paid.”

    BUCK: Yeah, monoclonal antibodies, too, by the way, not the cash cow that the vaccines are. Just putting that out. They do different things; we understand that. But it’s interesting to see how they’re treated so differently. I will say this, too, Clay. I got a very, very dear friend of mine up in Vermont, one of the smartest conservatives I know, and he’s aware…

    I know you brought this up in the show. They’re having a pretty serious covid surge up there, and you have super high vaccination rates up there. I’m talking to friends of mine including up in Vermont and other places — well, here in New York, too. Even people who are vaxxed, the boosters have now become the last straw. They’re not doing it. They’re saying, “I’m sorry. I’m ticked off enough that I got vaxxed or whatever,” and I’ll tell you this right now. The Buckster’s not getting boostered.

    CLAY: (laughing)

    BUCK: That’s for damn sure. That’s not happening.

    CLAY: You already got the Spirit Airlines of vaccines with the J&J one shot. I will say this, too: There are some people who will respond to the Vermont data and say, “Oh, well, the death rate is nowhere near what it is in Vermont compared to Florida.” Well, that’s ’cause Florida is, one, a lot bigger.

    So you have to look at per capita, but also because Vermont is on the early stages. And if we have learned anything from the data, it’s that what typically happens is infection rates go up, then hospitalizations go up, and then the death rate goes up. In other words —

    BUCK: You have to look at population density specifically — and this is why in the early days people confused this. They thought, “Oh, New York City,” and there was this piece in the New York Post about this based on some MIT researcher. “It’s the subway system.” It actually wasn’t the subway system but the densest housing in the city corresponds with the arteries —

    CLAY: Yes.

    BUCK: — if you will, of the subway system because indoor transmission in houses and housing units is what happens. Dense population, dense housing in Vermont is when you can shout down the field and your neighbor a half mile away can hear you. It’s a very different…

    CLAY: Dynamic.

    BUCK: No hate to Vermont. It’s a beautiful state. I used to go camp there.

    CLAY: It’s 100% true.

    BUCK: Yeah. You get what I’m saying.

    CLAY: The data trails, I think it’s important to note — and we’ve learned this. The data on deaths trails the data on cases and hospitalizations. It’s a lagging indicator, as opposed to a forefront indicator.

    Recent Stories

    FAA Changes Rule to Hide Photos of Illegal Aliens at Border

    17 Sep 2021

    BUCK: We have one thing you can always count on with the media. They’ll go along with the dominant narrative of the Biden administration at any point in time, and they will decide that they no longer have to “speak truth to power,” especially if it could embarrass the Biden team, because one thing that your Democrat overlords cannot abide is being made fun of.

    That’s one thing that is just unacceptable to them. They can’t look foolish and silly because that erodes their power. Well, you see this in action right now at the U.S.-Mexico border, notably in the Del Rio section. Del Rio, Texas. This would be the Rio Grande sector in Del Rio, and you have thousands — an estimated 10,000 — illegal immigrants, illegal aliens who have gathered together.

    A lot of them are Haitian. A lot of them are Cuban. And there’s others too. Remember there are over 65 countries, give or take, represented just in the last 12 months who have crossed into America illegally. I have been down to the border numerous times. There are people from Bangladesh, from Vietnam.

    You’re always being told, “Oh, what about the people coming from El Salvador and Honduras who are fleeing crime and…?” Okay. Well, what about the people from all the rest of the world who are fleeing whatever they say they’re fleeing too? This is an open border. That’s the problem. But, Clay, this is a real moment.

    We’ve actually seen this stuff in real time. Because of drone footage courtesy of Fox News, you’ve seen this mass of people, thousands and thousands of people who are gathered under a highway overpass waiting to go into the United States interior. And the FAA, the Federal Aviation Administration, has suddenly said there is a two-week airspace ban! No drones around near this congregation point for over 10,000 illegal immigrants. This is just the Biden federal bureaucracy covering for the boss in the White House who looks like a clown with an open border.

    CLAY: Yes, 100% that’s what it is. It’s also an attempt… If they can avoid imagery, they can hopefully persuade the media not to cover the disaster at our southern border. This is significant ’cause I think it ties in with Biden’s overall failure across the country. And maybe at the top of the second hour we can run through some of the data on how much America is rejecting the Biden administration in general from some of the most recent polls as he’s hit basically a 42% approval rating.

    And what’s significant here, Buck, is we’re talking about 10,000 people, 10,000 people — and this is, by the way, just a small fraction of the people that are coming across our boarder like it’s a sieve. And, by the way, there is a huge percentage… We had Ted Cruz on yesterday, Buck, saying that of the young children that are in custody, there’s an over 20% covid positivity rate.

    So if you are obsessed like the Biden administration is with vaccine mandates, this is an incredible hypocrisy. You are allowing people to pour across our southern border, which is a violation of all sorts of federal law. We’ll leave that aside. But at a minimum, it’s in direct conflict with the arguments that are being made right now about the importance of testing for covid and about vaccine passports.

    Buck, think about this for a minute. You aren’t allowed to go out to a restaurant now or bar, basically, in New York or L.A. — our two largest cities — without having a vaccine passport. You are allowed to come across our southern border without getting any covid test at all. If you’re just being reasonable and knowledgeable and remotely consistent, which is more dangerous to America right now?

    Everybody pouring across the southern border with massive increase in covid cases along that border, or people in New York City or L.A. being able to go to a restaurant and sit at an outdoor table at a bar and have a drink or dinner without vaccine passports? ‘Cause one is required; the other one isn’t.

    BUCK: There’s clearly a double standard at work as well from the bureaucracy and from the federal government on the judicial side of all this stuff, because while we’re talking here about vaccine mandates and vaccine passports and all these different restrictions and regulations that are meant for public health, in fact, as we know, the CDC believed — which is madness.

    It had the power to tell you that you — not you, Clay, but “one,” right. (chuckling) It had the power to tell people that they could not evict someone who is refusing to pay rent in their home because of covid. This was the definition of federal bureaucrat overreach. Meanwhile, under very legitimate Title 42 health authority, which says that you are allowed to tell people who are coming into the country during a pandemic, “Sorry, you can’t come in.”

    A federal judge just yesterday has now blocked the Biden administration from even being able to use that — and the Biden administration has been avoiding using this or trying to get around it in a lot of ways, but this Title 42 power that it has to expel migrants showing up illegally because of covid risk.

    A federal judge has basically just said, “You know what? You’re not allowed to use health authority to prevent people who are covid positive from coming in to the United States,” because illegal immigrants are a protected class according to leftist interpretation of the law. Give them special rights.

    CLAY: They don’t even use the term “illegal immigrants.” It’s an offensive term now in their world, right?

    BUCK: It’s actually technically illegal aliens and federal statute.

    CLAY: Yeah, right but that’s now considered to be an offensive term.

    BUCK: “Undocumented” is what they want to call them.

    CLAY: Undocumented. Look, it’s also worth tying in — in addition to the flagrant hypocrisy going on with the covid not checking the border and simultaneously requiring citizens to have covid vaccine passports — remember, they’re also, Buck, trying to get citizenship under the budget reconciliation process right now.

    They’re trying to get millions of people who are not citizens right now, allowed to become citizens under the budget reconciliation, which they could never pass right now in the United States unless — and they’re putting all the pressure on the Senate parliamentarian to argue that this is an acceptable way to use the reconciliation.

    BUCK: I also think it’s worth noting that the way they’re trying to shoehorn eight million is what it actually is

    CLAY: Eight million people!

    BUCK: Eight million people is the number.

    CLAY: After an election decided by 40,000 votes, by the way, and they’re trying to suddenly push in eight million new voters.

    BUCK: Yeah, okay. But the reason they’re trying to do it is because they say it will expand essentially welfare programs, and so therefore it’s a budgetary issue. Meanwhile, if you point out that people who come into the country are more likely to need access to welfare — people coming in illegally and stay here — are more likely to need state benefits, get their health care at the ER, et cetera.

    All the things that we talk about: English as a second language instruction, the public school system, all of it. They say that’s terrible; it’s racist. Meanwhile, the Democrats are actually saying, “We’re gonna have a whole lot of people that will have more access to welfare benefits. That’s why it’s a budgetary measure. That’s why we’re gonna need reconciliation.”

    It’s madness that they’re even trying it and we’re all hoping the Senate parliamentarian has some iron backbone. You think, but you don’t know. And if they could get this thing through, Clay, it’s game over in the next election. So they’re throwing long bombs into the end zone right now. We’re saying, “Well, it probably won’t be caught.”

    CLAY: Hail Marys, every now and then, work.

    Recent Stories