×

Clay and Buck

For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Parents Across America Rebel Against CRT

23 Jun 2021

BUCK: Now we get into the rebellion of parents in Loudoun County, Virginia, a place I know pretty well from time that I worked in northern Virginia for the federal government. Langley. Loudoun County is pretty close by and you had… Well, I think one of the best ways to explain what’s going on, there’s a rebellion against CRT. There are people who are greatly upset at both the transgender policies as well as some of the critical race theory instruction.

Here’s a sense of what’s going on, what’s being said. Let’s play cut 10.

ILYSE KENNEDY: Everything I thought about how I existed in my white body in the world was very wrong. (chuckles) We’re unpacking wrong things that we have been taught in history class. There is a period of deep shame for being white and for acknowledging the harms that our ancestors have caused.

WOMAN 1: White accountability groups are really helpful in terms of having a place to process, having a group of people whose responsibility it is to call me on things or to challenge me.

WOMAN 2: The more you kind of dive into that, the more I’m really realizing how deeply rooted racism is into, like, my everyday thought process, no matter how much you work at that, there’s still even almost more work to be done.

BUCK: So, this is some of the left-wing theory around CRT. We’ll get into the parents and the Loudoun County rebellion, Clay, but this is actually from the Washington Post. They had a video out that was talking about “white accountability groups.”

CLAY: So, we talked about the fact that over half of Americans have been born since 1981. I went, Buck, to public school in Nashville, Tennessee, K through 12, integrated public school. And I’m wondering as I sit and I listen to these kind of clips, what am I accountable for? What? In the grand scheme of things here, what am I supposed to be apologetic for?

Moreover, I’m at least 42. I was born around 1980 — ’79, to be exact — but what are my kids accountable for? And that’s what these parents that we’re gonna hear from in Virginia are talking about right now, Buck. They’re raising, I think, legitimate questions about young kids being instructed that because they happened to be born white, they are racist — or because they happened to be born black, they are victims.

Long before they even have come to understand very much about themselves at all. And ultimately what this critical race theory is designed to do is destroy the basis for American exceptionalism. That’s really what it is, right? Because if America is not an exceptional democratic country which people are dying to get into every day, Buck.

Then after our institutions can be torn down and destroyed because at their root, as critical race theory would argue, they are not worthy of protection because all of our founding documents — the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence — according to critical race theory and according to this ridiculous 1619 Project, all of it is rooted so despicably in racism that none of it can be supported any longer.

BUCK: Undermining key documents, foundational concepts of America, if you were a radical, revolutionary leftist, that would be a really useful thing to do. If you wanted, dare I say, fundamental transformation of this republic, it would be very helpful to get rid of not just the shared bonds of our history, but also some of the institutions — namely, the Constitution and others — that keep us on the same page.

CLAY: A whole bunch of old white guys were involved in, Buck. That’s what the critical race theorists would tell us, and, therefore, we don’t need to care what those people think.

BUCK: So the white accountability groups video that we played for you just a moment ago was put out from the Washington Post on Friday as part of its series The New Normal, and those are some of the basic critical race theory concepts in action, which is that you have to confront your whiteness, you have to — essentially, to your point about what’s the responsibility here — embrace intersectionality.

This is the left-wing framework for interlocking oppression all throughout our society. There is a hierarchy. Some people are oppressed. Some people are victimizers. And we have to always take that into account. And it doesn’t matter what your individual actions are.

In a sense, this eradicates individual morality and actually agency because — to your point about your kids — if you’re responsible for something you did not do, had no hand in, and they can’t even point to an action that contributes to that you have done as a person, what are you? If we’re all collectively guilty, no one’s really guilty is how this all starts to break down.

CLAY: And what it is is so myopic in many ways, however, ’cause it only focuses on a relatively small part of human history. Because if you are actually interested in world history, what is fascinating to me about American life and existence is what a tiny pinprick we are of the overall world history. And ironically with the whole 1619 Project…

I know you’re a history guy, too, Buck. In 1619, we were British colonies. If you’re really fired up about reparations — and no one ever makes this argument, but I do think it’s a fascinating one from a historical and logic perspective — the United States as an independent nation only had slavery for 80 years: From 1783, when we won our independence from England, to 1863 when the Emancipation Proclamation was officially taking effect, is 80 years.

So 1619 up to 1783, if you’re angry about that, hey, that’s Britain; go get reparations from them. You got an 80-year window but since 1863, pretty long window now, there has been no slavery in the United States. So we’re talking from 1619 all the way up to the present day about 80 years when the United States of America had slavery, and even then it wasn’t in every state.

BUCK: To give you a sense of how radical the left-wing argument on this can become, they’ll even start to say that because oppression is more invisible and more passive, and you have more subconscious racism, we have to work even harder —

CLAY: To eradicate it.

BUCK: — because it’s everywhere and it’s omnipresent, don’t you see? It may be at a low level. It’s almost like virus that’s freely floating in the air, but somehow, they can’t tell us who’s actually getting sick or who’s responsible for it. This is the way that they are able to continue with the CRT rhetoric.

I did want to have Rachel Pisani (who was on Fox & Friends in the morning) who is one of the parents at Loudoun County, to bring us back to the Loudoun County CRT we will be. Here is how she describes what her kids actually get taught in school. At this school board meeting, they had a big fight about it, we’ll get into it. Here’s what she said.

PISANI: The parent protests won’t stop. I mean, we are an army of moms and parents that will not stop until we’re heard. So they can mute our mics; they can arrest us; they can kick us off of public property. We’re not gonna stop. They will fire any teacher that is not culturally in agreement with the school board and their tactics. This is insanity in America. This isn’t freedom of speech, not freedom of religion. It’s racism, and it’s cloaked in socialism.

CLAY: Well said. And I would point out this as well, Buck, in what you were just talking about and what she is talking about in Virginia and what is going on all over this country. There has been a big shift, and you’re seeing it in the talking points, which is very Orwellian.

I had a good friend of mine from law school recently. She said, you know, you really need to go back and read 1984 again because a lot of people talk Orwellian — they used that adjective, Buck — to kind of describe what things are going on. But most of us aren’t thinking about what we may recall from reading that book in high school or when we were younger.

And so I recently went back and started reading that — same thing with Fahrenheit 451 — and so much of it… And frankly, if you want to read Animal Farm as well. So much of it is about changing what basic words mean. And one that goes to the essence of this with critical race theory — and you’re seeing it happen. Pay attention to how often you’re seeing this now.

For most of my life, Buck, we talked about equality in America. What we sought was equality. Now, equality is a difficult goal to reach because we’re all fundamentally different in many different ways. We all have different attributes. We all have different flaws. So equality is an aspirational goal.

So what we are seeking is equality from the government. In other words, the government treats everyone equal. Now, what you’re seeing — and it’s only happened in, like, the last year — everybody’s seeking “equity,” which is something that is vastly different than equality.

“Equity” is about charging people and making them pay a price for something that they may have nothing to do with at all. And I want all of you out there with us talking about this conversation to start to pay attention. Buck you, have you noticed that?

BUCK: Of course.

CLAY: The change from equality to equity? I think it’s so seductive in the way that the talking points changed. And I think those words are similar enough that people don’t focus on it as much. But CRT is about equity, not equality.

BUCK: Even the expansion of what we were talking about yesterday, white supremacy, everything. Everything… It used to be white supremacy as a term was universally understood in America as hateful, neo-Nazi, active, racist, bad people, who were —

CLAY: — KKK burning the cross in people’s yards. That was white supremacy.

BUCK: They were on the fringes, rightly so, of society, a tiny, tiny percentage overall of the American people. And yet now, because of the association of white supremacy, and rightfully so, very bad, now they said, “Well, college admissions can be white supremacy, and these other…”

And that, then, forces… In the same Orwellian word game fashion, that forces people to defend what the left has now decided falls under this umbrella of white supremacy. “What do you mean that you don’t want there to be equity in hiring? Don’t you want to dismantle structures of white supremacy?”

It’s a trick, but it’s a very effective one. By, just one more very clear example of this, Clay, we’ve gone ’cause we talked about immigration today, weave gone from “illegal alien,” the official federal government term in the U.S. legal code, to then it became more “illegal immigrant,” to then it became “undocumented,” right?

That’s an important shift as well, because they don’t want the term to actually reflect illegality, even though that’s what we’re talking about. All you gotta do with the undocumented is give them documents. That’s all that it is. Amnesty is the solution, you see. There’s no problem anymore.

CLAY: It’s downright terrifying when you think about it. And I know that many of our listeners are out there thinking about it on a daily basis. And I think about this from the perspective of a parent. Because I’ve already been through school. I went to public school K through 12 for better or worse.

But I think a lot about what my kids are being taught and what they are being taught about American history. And to me, as a nation, we have to ensure that we have a universal narrative that we can all believe in. And America as the shining city on the hill was what I grew — in my multiracial school — studying. And now we’re hearing oppressor, victimization, equity.

BUCK: The Loudoun County school superintendent declared a meeting — this was just in the last 24 hours — an unlawful assembly. There were actually… We’re getting to the point now, Clay. This is why I’m using the term rebellion, parents are getting arrested over this because they insist on having their voices heard and education bureaucrats don’t want to hear it. They prefer the situation of the right just being silent and allowing this had to happen.

CLAY: It’s insane. It’s ridiculous.

Recent Stories

Get Password Hint

Enter your email to receive your password hint.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Forgot password

Enter your e-mail to receive your account information via e-mail.

Need help? Contact customer service.

Rush’s Timeless Wisdom: They’re Serious About Defunding the Police

23 Jun 2021

CLAY: Rush Limbaugh talked a lot about defunding the police. I think he would agree with much of what we have said. But let’s go ahead and let you hear from him about the absurdity of this decision.

RUSH: Folks, I gotta tell you, the level of incompetence at some of the formerly most trustworthy, reliable institutions is one of the greatest elements of this country’s. … You used to be able to count on things. There used to be institutions that were reliable, you trusted the people in them, you trusted when they came out and said something, especially if they were focused on public safety.

And now that trust, it just isn’t there. And the answer, the reason why is not that complicated. It is liberal political corruption of these institutions that has led to all this. Now you got people questioning what they hear about anything. Like for example, the left is serious about defunding police departments.

But yet there’s a poll out that shows most people don’t think that’s what they really mean. They do mean it! People don’t believe that the left is serious about defunding the cops. Well, they are terribly mistaken. The anti-police are not shy about it. Black Lives Matter says on its website it wants to defund the police to “invest in communities.”

They’re dead serious about defunding the police and replacing the police with themselves, social workers or what have you. We’ve talked about how many cities and towns are planning to send social workers to respond to nonviolent emergency calls instead of the cops. And I have told you, I have warned everybody that this is a way for the left to infiltrate normally conservative police departments with “progressives.”

Social workers, left-wing sandal wearing, Birkenstock-clad, longhaired, maggot-infested, no-underarm deodorant, little socialist day care workers running into your house pretending to be cops. I mean, who’s more progressive than social workers?

Never mind that it means social workers are gonna have to deal with drug addicts and the mentally ill — and, believe me, those kinds of people can become violent without warning at any time. This is gonna lead to the death of social workers. It’s gonna lead to massive lawsuits against cities and towns.

BUCK: I think the key here that Rush is getting at, Clay, is that we should take the left at their word and then understand that once enough people figure out what their real plan is, what the left’s actual plan is when it comes to police, then they start to play these games.

And we should make sure they understand that there’s dishonesty going on. Defund the police is a perfect example. They say they want to defund the police, it starts to happen, and then when the backlash — the counterrevolution, in a sense — gets underway, they start to say, “Well, we don’t really mean ‘defund police.'”

CLAY: We mean “reimagine” police.

BUCK: That’s right. They have these different terms that all of a sudden come out. And that’s just meant to deal with the news cycle and public’s attention and try to make it so it’s not as clear as it should be in the public’s mind, generally speaking. So that in places like Minneapolis, and Austin, and New York — and, you know, name a city; there are a lot of them out there — where there was at least a consideration of defunding if not an actual removal of dollars from the budget.

And we need to see right now… We need to make sure that everyone sees that this resulted in… You know, sometimes we talk about politics and, you know, Clay it’s the marginal tax rate or it’s foreign policy that doesn’t really affect anybody here, but we’d like there to be some agreement somewhere between third parties, whatever.

This matters to all of us, to everyone that your streets are safe, that law enforcement is supported, that people know that the police are essential to their safety. And, you know, especially state and local law enforcement. They come from the communities they serve.

They’re your neighbors. They want the streets. They want the neighborhoods to be as safe as anybody else. And it’s their job to do so. Undermining them — it’s what I always say about the BLM movement — just makes everything worse for everyone, actually.

CLAY: It creates more tension and more distrust on both sides, and the result of tension and distrust is more issues. Remember, if everyone in every viral police interaction video had immediately complied with the police, they don’t get escalated to the next level, and that’s what so fires me up.

If they would encourage compliance with police, then we would have less violence in the streets, period. But the idea that police are creating violence? What you’re seeing is they’re preventing it. Because, as they’re retiring, as they’re being defunded, as they are being disrespected, the crime rates are skyrocketing all over the country.

And even Joe Biden is acknowledging it now.

Recent Stories

Could Obama 2008 Be Nominated by Democrats Today?

23 Jun 2021

Clay posed a provocative question: 

“Go back to Obama 2008, that was an ‘America is amazing’ campaign. Go back and look at what he ran on in 2008. Democrats run on entitlement now. They deserve it because of their identity alone. Not because America’s an amazing place. I think it’s a fascinating question. Go look at it. Opposed to gay marriage? He couldn’t be the nominee.”

What do you think?

Listen to Clay and Buck discuss it in the clip below:

Recent Stories

Smart or Not? Should Herschel Walker Run for Senate in Georgia?

22 Jun 2021

CLAY: One of the big questions has been, given the fact that he has to run for reelection in 2022, Reverend Raphael Warnock, who won a close election in Georgia — who the Republicans are going to pick to run against him has become a massive storyline. And one of the guys that I think would absolutely dominate in the state of Georgia is Herschel Walker, legendary former running back of the Georgia Bulldogs. We just saw in the state next door, Buck, Tommy Tuberville in Alabama, former Auburn football coach, get elected, and he replaced Doug Jones after the mess with Roy Moore and that Senate election. I think the same thing could happen if Herschel Walker ran against Warnock, and Herschel Walker is teasing it in a big way. Listen to what he posted on social media earlier this week.

WALKER: Hey, what you hear there is hope. That’s what I call it. You know, he’s ready. I’m getting ready. And we can run with the big dogs.

CLAY: So, Herschel Walker, the national championship running back for the George Bulldogs, who have not won a title since he was there, and that’s a video that he put out where he zooms in on that car says he’s ready to run with the big dogs and shows a Georgia license plate on that car and many people — including me — are taking that as a sign. Donald Trump has tried to encourage him to run. Buck, are you actually intrigued by the story? Does Herschel Walker for Senate in any way make sense to you?

BUCK: Well, look Kelly Loeffler you recommended was appointed —

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: — right? Kelly Loeffler was appointed and then defeated by Raphael Warnock, but I think that was a perfect storm of bad timing for Republicans in Georgia. You had a lot of GOP-on-GOP —

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: — consternation to put it politely — family show here, consternation. And Trump was obviously getting all the attention because of the after-election controversies and all the debates about what happened there. So we lost. I mean, the fact we lost those two Georgia Senate seats was a gut punch after getting kicked in the face on Election Day. And I think that the next time around you’ll see a far more favorable environment ’cause the great thing about Democrats, Clay, is the more people have to deal with their actual results of governance, the more they realize maybe they shouldn’t actually have them in charge.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: I want to update you on the poll question, which is an interesting one. We talked in the first hour quite a bit about the idea of the filibuster and the overall power dynamic that exists in the United States Senate right now where we have 50-50 tie with Kamala Harris breaking the tie.

There’s a lot of talk about who is going to challenge Raphael Warnock next year in Georgia in 2022, and Herschel Walker seems as if — the legendary running back from the University of Georgia — seems as if he is gonna step into this fray.

You can go vote in this at Facebook, you can go vote in it at Twitter, you can go vote in it at ClayandBuck.com.

<blockquote class=”twitter-tweet”><p lang=”en” dir=”ltr”>Should <a href=”https://twitter.com/HerschelWalker?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@HerschelWalker</a> run for Senate against Warnock in Georgia in 2022? Vote in the <a href=”https://twitter.com/clayandbuck?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@clayandbuck</a> poll today.</p>&mdash; Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) <a href=”https://twitter.com/ClayTravis/status/1407380398917754880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>June 22, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src=”https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=”utf-8″></script>

Nearly 90% of you are saying that Herschel Walker should run for the Senate. I think he would win that Senate seat in the state of Georgia.

Recent Stories

Buck Warns: Dems Attempt the Biggest Power Grab in History

22 Jun 2021

BUCK: The Democrats are trying an enormous power grab.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: We know this. This has been central, in fact, from the very beginning of this Biden administration. They’ve wanted to make structural changes. They talk about things like statehood for D.C.

CLAY: And for Puerto Rico.

BUCK: Puerto Rico, right. Statehood and they want to eliminate the filibuster. Why do they want to eliminate the filibuster? Because they want to create a legislative steamroller effect where they can get whatever they want. I mean, they want amnesty? Boom, done, 51 votes — or 50 plus Kamala as the vice president as the tiebreaker.

Today Senate Republicans are gonna be blocking the Democrats in the Senate from this election… I love what they call it: Election and Ethics Reform Bill. I was not of the impression that our elections were so polluted and awful that they needed reform in this regard, but when you actually dig down into what has happened here and what’s actually going on with their efforts, you see that on a lot of this, Clay — and I don’t think this will be a surprise to you — they’re lying to people about where the public actually is on things like that voter ID. They’re lying to people about what it will actually mean if you federalize elections at this level. So, it’s important that Republicans hold this line.

CLAY: Not only are they lying, and I don’t really… I understand. There’s always this great topic. You remember Brian Williams and Hillary Clinton? Brian Williams loses his job in the media for lying about being under fire in Bosnia. He said the exact same thing that Hillary Clinton said. She lied about being under fire in Bosnia, too, and they went and they looked at the response and they said, “Well, why did you hold, as a nation, Brian Williams to this standard that you didn’t hold Hillary Clinton to?”

And it’s kind of an antiquated standard back in the day, Buck, but the answer was because people expect politicians to lie. Several years ago, at least there was the hope that if you were a journalist, if you were a media member, that you would be held to the standard of truth. And it’s funny, remember whether the Billy Bush tape came out with the Access Hollywood with Donald Trump.

Billy Bush wasn’t allowed to work the Today show anymore and Donald Trump got elected president. Right? The disconnect sometimes between the way the media and politicians get treated based on similar behavior. So what upsets me is not that politicians lie because I think, unfortunately, most of us have come to the realization that politicians often lie. But that this wouldn’t be a big story, to your point. The data is out of what the American public actually supports when it comes to voting bills.

BUCK: Do you think that politicians lie more than journalists? Because I would argue that journalists are more dishonest now than your standard-issue politician.

CLAY: It’s a good question. I think it used to be that there was more trust in journalists than there was in politicians. I think it is now the case that there is less trust in journalists. There’s not a lot of trust in politicians or journalists. Like, I remember when you look at the professions that people trust in the country, I remember I was for a while, when I was practicing law and then I moved into journalism, I think lawyer and journalist are the two least trusted positions in America right now.

BUCK: And yet there have been lawyer jokes for decades.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: The journo jerks — (chuckles) jerks, jokes, same thing — are just starting now.

CLAY: Right, and also, lawyers recognize that we are hired assassins, right? If you pay a lawyer enough money, his job or her job is to argue your side. That’s why I like not practicing law full time now because I get to look at all the facts and I get to choose which side I want to argue. I didn’t like, necessarily, being a hired gun because you talk to any lawyer out there, you can look at two sides of the case and if you give them five minutes to review it, they’ll be like, “Oh, I’d choose that side.”

BUCK: So I would argue the journalists are in fact very much the same as lawyers in this regard, and that people who work in the media are all takes orders for a side, for a constituency, and that journalism as a profession of neutrality and objectivity has always been a farce in this country. It’s just gotten more apparent now.

CLAY: I think it’s gotten worse in social media era, and that’s an interesting discussion. The difference I would say between lawyers and journalists is, lawyers don’t pretend that they’re doing anything other than advocating for their client. Journalists — I always like to call them “Capital J Journalists,” the people who think they have the most important job in America.

They will argue with you that the sanctity of truth is their only light, when in reality it often isn’t. But this is what a good journalist, I think, should be doing. They should be looking at the data from the country as a whole. This is from Monmouth, right? They do a big poll dealing with this question of whether or not we trust elections.

BUCK: They’re a little liberal, by the way. Monmouth skews left. So we’re all on the same page, Monmouth skews a little liberal.

CLAY: This result is even more fascinating. The question was straightforward: “Do you support or oppose requiring the voters show a photo ID in order to vote?” and 80% support it. That includes, Buck, 91% of Republicans; 87% of independents. Do you know how hard it is to get 87% of independents to agree on anything? The numbers continue: 62% of Democrats, 77% of white voters — and prepare for your jaw to drop — 84% of nonwhite voters, 81% of all voters under $50,000 a year in income.

BUCK: And yet every night when you watch — not that any of you should. But if you watch MSNBC or you watch CNN, you turn on these shows, you read these newspapers, they will tell you (and this is the central narrative) that voter ID is racist. They will say this to you. They’ll say that any effort to impose voter ID… They’ll even… You remember Joe Biden said. I was honestly shocked. I’m rarely shocked, Clay, by how over the top and dishonest Democrats are in political discussions. But when Joe Biden was referring to the Jim Crow of this era —

CLAY: Jim Crow 2.0.

BUCK: Jim Crow 2.0. That felt like, “You guys have gotta to be kidding me, right?”

CLAY: Yes. Yes.

BUCK: This —

CLAY: He called the filibuster Jim Crow 2.0, as well.

BUCK: This is the same level of stupidity as when there were some Democrats — including, unfortunately, the former CIA director — who were comparing, under the Trump administration, the detention centers for migrants coming into the country to the Holocaust.

CLAY: Oh, yeah.

BUCK: It’s a level of —

CLAY: Concentration camps.

BUCK: Concentration camps. It’s a level of stupidity beyond what you would even expect from Democrats. But they keep saying that it’s racist night after night on TV, and as you point out, the data shows so very clearly, folks, they’re just lying about this.

CLAY: It’s an absolute, 100% lie. This is also fascinating, Buck. Do you know what you’re required to do to get a vaccine for covid? Bring a photo ID. I got my email. I didn’t get my vaccine. I was signed up to get the one shot, ’cause I told my wife I’d get the shot, get the vaccine and three things happened. One: All the people who were severely in danger had had their right to do it. Two: There was a one-shot.

Three: I didn’t have to wait. I’m impatient. So I had it scheduled. On the day that they pulled the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, I was scheduled to go get the vaccine, right? I got an email from Publix, which is where I was getting it, the local grocery store chain. The email told me, Buck, that in order to get my vaccine I had to bring a photo ID. So we are allowing an argument to be made that it is racist to require a photo ID to vote, but in order to get this Holy Grail vaccine you have to bring a photo ID!

BUCK: The Supreme Court’s already ruled by this, by the way, in the past.

CLAY: How crazy is that?

BUCK: There’s nothing discriminatory or wrong about voter ID, and yet it is one of the most misrepresented topics, and we’re not just talking about this because we’re trying to have some academic discussion.

CLAY: They’re on the Senate floor right now!

BUCK: (chuckling) They’re trying to make so that you have a federal control. Here’s the truth. You want to know what really happens if Democrats were to get their way on this? Republicans are not gonna win another national election for a few years, and maybe forever, because after this goes through, if they were to get… Let’s say they get H.R. 1, which they’re not going to because of Sinema and the filibuster right now.

But let’s just accelerate this a little bit. If they were to get their way, of course you’ve got amnesty down the line, you’ve got all these things the Democrats have been promising they want to do, H.R. 1, the For the People Act, which is… I mean, it does have a kind of Orwellian or even Soviet vibe.

CLAY: It totally does.

BUCK: “Oh, the For the People Act! How could you be against that? It’s the Good People Act!” If they get this, Clay, they have such an advantage. They used covid… Here’s what happened the last election cycle. They used covid as an excuse to force through under emergency circumstances everything that they thought would assist them.

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: And I would argue in the case of Pennsylvania — I don’t care the Supreme Court didn’t take it up still in an unconstitutional fashion — expanding the voting parameters and early voting and getting rid of ID requirements, all of this stuff, and now they want to make it permanent. That’s what H.R. 1’s all about, which, by the way, it’s really the Make Democrats a Permanent Majority Act. That’s the purpose of this.

CLAY: And I think we agree — and we talked about this and I’m sure we’re gonna talk about this a lot — Trump wins in a landslide if covid doesn’t happen. The Democrats latched on to covid, what I call, “fear porn” as a way to beat Trump in 2020. We can talk about whether that beating in quotation marks ever actually occurred even with all the parameters that were in place.

But you’re right. They want to give themselves a permanent home-court advantage, for lack of a better way to say it — you talked about it — potentially adding, once they do away go with the filibuster, two seats for Washington, D.C., two seats for Puerto Rico. Also expanding the Supreme Court. I mean, these are monumentally radical ideas.

Recent Stories

Clay Fired Up Over CRT: They’re Teaching This in Iowa!

22 Jun 2021

CLAY: Let’s start off, I think, here, Buck, by playing a clip from Chuck Todd where you basically get the argument that is misconstruing what critical race theory is and why it’s destroying the foundations of the American democracy, I think, that we have all so richly cherished. Listen to this clip and then we’re gonna unpack it a bit for.

AMNA NAWAZ: Specific to this idea of critical race theory, I have to tell you, I just spent some time reporting on this county in Virginia about an hour outside of Washington. And to your point, this is something that is mobilizing people —

CHUCK TODD: (whispers) It sure is.

AMNA NAWAZ: — and resonating very deeply. It was about a hundred-degree day. Dozens and dozens and dozens of parents, mostly white, in this largely affluent county showed up to a school board meeting — for many of them (snickers), the very first school board meeting they’ve ever attended — specifically because of this one issue.

BRAD TODD: That’s important to note. (sputtering) It — it — that… Y-y-you mentioned critical race theory a couple times. This is a parent-led backlash at the grassroots level.

CHUCK TODD: It’s manufactured —

BRAD TODD: No.

CHUCK TODD: — and — and — and then sort of teachers been lit.

BRAD TODD: I disagree.

CHUCK TODD: This fire was lit! Eh?

BRAD TODD: I think it started because parents have had it with the education bureaucracy after covid.

CHUCK TODD: (grumbling) Mmm-hmm.

BRAD TODD: They’re fed up with it. Th-they tend to trust Democrats when it comes to education funding, but they trust Republicans on education accountability. I think that what the backlash you’re seeing on critical race theory in schools is another example of parents trying to hold educators accountable.

CLAY: Okay, Buck, critical race theory. Why in your mind is this story coming from? You just heard the debate there a little bit. How would you define it for people out there listening to us right now?

BUCK: It is… There’s the academic origin of it, which goes back to the critical legal theorists and people who are writing that the American legal framework… This is back, really, in the seventies and the eighties, it became more prominent. The American legal framework should reflect the institutional racism of America and therefore address it by treating people differently.

The legal framework has to treat people differently on the basis of race, and from this we get some things like — or some ideas like — affirmative action. But this goes well beyond affirmative action into every aspect of the law. It’s just a question of how they choose to apply it. The way it’s being taught today and discussed today is largely… I think it’s fair to call it racial Marxism.

Now, it’s not classical Marxism in the sense that you have a bourgeoisie and a proletariat and one oppressing the other and that’s an economic oppression argument. But it is Marxist in the sense that it tries to use the inequality that will always exist in any society as a means of dividing and separating people. But instead of class, the critical race theorists use race.

And they demand that people transfer power into the hands of an essentially left-wing elite to address the imbalances in society because of — you guessed it — systemic racism. So here you’ve replaced the class warfare of classical Marxism with a racial Marxism that is now being used not only in, of course, corporate America and a lot of other places that are teaching government institutions that are teaching CRT.

But they’re indoctrinating kids. And I think what was just said on that clip as well, parents like you are more aware because of all the Zoom lessons and everything of what their kids are actually being taught. And they had more time perhaps to even see what they’re being sent. And they realized that this is a very real indoctrination process. But that then brings us to you notice what Chuck Todd does. All of a sudden, critical race theory is a manufactured issue from the right —

CLAY: Right.

BUCK: — which just goes to show you they’re upset that people are paying attention to it now. They much preferred when they could have their way in all the schools without anyone on the right saying a word about it.

CLAY: And this goes to my argument we were talking about yesterday and something that I’m gonna keep beating the drums on. Essentially this is an attack at the fabric of America, utilizing our difference — which is entirely cosmetic — to divide us, and so let’s think big picture here. What unites a nation?

Usually it’s a shared history, a shared belief system. And the reason why so many people are dying to come in the United States of America every single day is because we offer uniquely, in the world, an opportunity for anyone who works hard enough to get ahead. What critical race theory is essentially arguing is you can’t get ahead because everything is so structurally aligned against you that unless you are — let’s, frankly, be honest here — a white man.

‘Cause that’s what this is really about, right? The attacks on Western civilization are about white men in positions of power who made decisions that have led to the greatest country in the history of the world. As our democracy has expanded, we have allowed everyone to be involved in it, right? I mean this is kind of the history of the legal system.

This is me putting on my lawyer hat in a big picture. Initially, who could vote in the United States of America? Rich people who owned the land, white men. And then we expanded it to white men. And then we expanded it to black men when the civil rights movement, we finally expanded it to all people having access to the ballot, and we added women in the 1920s.

I gotta include them as well. But we’ve expanded. So now the entire universe of American life — as long as you’re 18 years old and a citizen — you can vote. Did you see the clip that Bill Maher put out about “progressophobia,” like the idea being that America now is more racist than ever it’s ever been before or more sexist than it’s ever been before —

BUCK: Yes.

CLAY: — which effectively comes out of that, right?

BUCK: Of course. And this is why you have people who will say things… Let’s be very clear, folks, with what we mean. You have Joe Biden saying that Georgia passing certain laws about early voting —

CLAY: These are lies.

BUCK: — is Jim Crow 2.0.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: The level of exaggeration from Democrats about the degree of racism in this country is intended as a control mechanism and to keep them in power, to keep the Democratic and the left in power. The things that they say — I mean, it’s outrageous, you know, the Major League Baseball All-Star Game which got so much attention —

CLAY. Oh, my God. I’m still fired up about that.

BUCK: — a few months ago back, you know, they moved it to a state that had largely you could sort of compare them on a more direct basis, moved to Colorado which has more restrictive voting laws in many respects than the state of Georgia did in the first place.

CLAY: And your state of New York —

BUCK: Of course.

CLAY — where Major League Baseball is located, is more restrictive than Georgia. In fact, if you look at restrictive voting rights, the bill that was supported by Joe Manchin as a replacement for the voting rights bill that’s supposedly on the floor of the Senate right now being voted down? It was actually basically the Georgia bill. And yet all these people out there arguing that this is in some way — in any way — connected to the historical basis of Jim Crow is one of the most dishonest things that’s been said in the twenty-first century, which is saying something.

BUCK: And it also unfortunately is to this point has been effective politics for Democrats, and we know the BLM movement, for example, has also raised a whole lot of money and has a tremendous influence in corporate America. We talked about that a little bit before, but now you’re starting to see what people are calling a backlash to it. There are other words you could even use.

You could say trying to establish a balance or just take us back to a reality-based perception of what’s going on and what’s being taught to kids in schools. So now they’re playing all these games, Clay. They’ll say, “That’s not really critical race theory,” when something comes up. When there’s either a school… There are these super, fancy, expensive schools in places like Los Angeles and New York that are teaching kids straight-up oppression theory, right? And if you question it, by the way? (chukcles)

CLAY: You’re racist.

BUCK: Then you’re racist. So you have to framework here where infused with racism. That’s what critical race theory is. “There’s racism everywhere.” There’s no way to get around it or deal with it that doesn’t involve treating people differently on the basis of race, which a lot of people would say is racism —

CLAY: Is racism.

BUCK: — and if you question this, you are —

CLAY: Racist.

BUCK: Bam!

CLAY: There’s no way to have a legitimate argument or discussion about this. And that, to me, is really what is so integral about this is you have an argument going on. First of all, this is a stat that I saw that kind of blew my mind, Buck. What do you think the average age in America is right now? You’re dead on. I’ll just tell you: Over half of Americans have been born since 1981 in this country right now. I was born in 1979. You were born in ’82, something like that.

BUCK: ’81.

CLAY: ’81. So, if you do the math on this, we have not grown up in a fundamentally racist country. Yet the people who are most embracing the idea of critical race theory are the people who have grown up in the least racist version of America. And these people are running around legitimately saying, “America’s never been more racist! America’s never been more sexist.”

And it just makes me want to pull my hair out because you have to have a fundamental misapprehension and misunderstanding, assuming that you’re not doing it intentionally, of all of human history to even make an argument such as that right now, and it’s rooted in what I think are the twin pillars — and we’ll continue to explore this topic as we go forward.

The twin pillars of leftist thought right now, which is, “Your identity defines you,” identity politics, and then if you question identity politics, what do they full it with? Cancel culture. You’re racist. You’re sexist. If you question any of this, you don’t deserve the right to have your opinion heard. God forbid you be a white guy who questions any of it, and (chuckles) then you’re even more of a cancel culture suspect. I mean, it’s really a terrifying dynamic that has been put in place here and we’re gonna continue to break it down for you going forward.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

BAUCHAM: Critical race theory, just like all the critical studies, really comes from a Marxist perspective, this idea that you divide the world up into oppressors and the oppressed. And in critical race theory, white people, white America and America itself is the oppressor, and all people of color, minorities, are the oppressed. The purpose of it is a revolutionary political change. So this has absolutely nothing to do with — and is contrary to — biblical principles, and it’s obvious when you read the literature.

BUCK: Critical race theory, folks, neo-Marxist in its approach. There you had — and welcome back to The Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show — Dr. Voddie Baucham who is an African-American minister and intellectual talking about the roots of this ideology and, you know, Clay, every day now it seems like there’s another school district, another… And this is government teaching sometimes. They’ll do government seminars with this stuff that will start to define what they view as white supremacy, will refer to America as a white supremacist nation. I remember your seeing… It’s funny. Clay, we didn’t actually coordinate this.

CLAY: I’m just looking. During the commercial break, like, just so people know, like, into our studio, like, what do we usually do? We catch up on whatever the news is, right? We want to make sure that we’re not missing anything. So we’ll have conversations. But we pull up our computers or our phones or whatever and make sure we’re seeing everything and literally while we’re having this discussion on this critical race theory… This is crazy, right? You’re looking at this chart in Iowa?

BUCK: Yeah, this is from Benny Johnson, so hat hip to Benny Johnson here. “Leaked documents,” and Benny’s at Newsmax, I believe, “from Iowa school system show teachers are forced to classify Make America Great Again as a type of racism and white supremacy — This is done through mandatory critical race theory,” he writes, “training forced on teachers at taxpayer expense.” That’s right. MAGA is —


CLAY: Teaching in Iowa.

BUCK: They’re teaching kids in school. It’s just on the borderline of overt white supremacy. So it’s essentially covert or, you know, just below hate crimes and swastikas. That’s what they have on this chart they’re showing people.

CLAY: I want to read some of these that are covert white supremacy. Are you ready? You’re looking at this now. This is what they are teaching in Iowa schools right now. All right. Are you ready? Here is something that is covert white supremacy. I hope that you guys have not done this. If you celebrate Columbus Day, you are a white supremacist. First of all, Columbus was Italian, right? I mean, he was selling on behalf of Italy, if I’m not — or is it Spain? Spain on —

BUCK: He is Genoese, but he was sailing on behalf of Ferdinand and Isabel.

CLAY: So I got that. Right I didn’t screw that up. All right. So I don’t know that I would necessarily say, like, “Hey, hard-core white supremacist there.” You are a white supremacist, if you assume, Buck, that good intentions are enough. If you are doing your best, you are a white supremacist. Here are some other things that this would be considered covert white supremacy. Saying, “Don’t blame me. I never owned slaves.” No one owned slaves! (laughing)

BUCK: (laughing)

CLAY: No one! Half of America has been born since 1981. They weren’t even alive when Ronald Reagan got elected. That’s a long time after slavery.

BUCK: I remember when we used — and this has been an intentional effort. The left’s control of language is something we’re gonna continue to hammer here because they get away with it all the time. I remember when white supremacy, not long ago, was guys with swastikas —

CLAY: Yes, yes.

BUCK: — and shaved heads who were gonna hurt people. Now it’s good intentions are enough. They’ve done this on purpose, obviously.

CLAY: It’s white supremacy, Buck, to believe we’re just one human family.

BUCK: Man, a lot of changes we gotta make here.

CLAY: And look, by the way, this is Iowa!

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: This ain’t, like, far left-wing New York City school. Iowa! They are teaching you that, if you believe we’re all one human family, you’re a white supremacist.

BUCK: Clay, we have every line lit here.

CLAY: I’m fired up. This is crazy.

Recent Stories

Sinema and Manchin Hold the Line… For Now

22 Jun 2021

BUCK: The Democrats have a plan. They haven’t been able to get it yet. Kyrsten Sinema, senator from Arizona, seems to be standing in the way, at least for now. Clay is gonna tell you exactly why she’s making that case. But first, Senator Lindsey Graham decides that he needs to call out what he’s seeing here. Play it.

GRAHAM: I like Joe Manchin a lot, but we had the largest turnout in the history of the United States, and states are in charge of voting in America. So I don’t like the idea of taking the power to redistrict away from state legislators. You’re having people move from blue states to red states. Under this proposal, you would have some kind of commission redraw the new districts, and I don’t like that.

I want states where people are moving to have control over how to allocate new congressional seats. So as much as I like Joe Manchin, the answer would be no. In my view, S.R. 1 is the biggest power grab in the history of the country. It mandates ballot harvesting, no voter ID. It does away with the states being able to redistrict when you have population shifts. It’s just a bad idea, and it’s a problem that most Republicans are not going to sign on to. They’re trying to fix a problem most Republicans have a different view of.

BUCK: So Lindsey Graham lays out what this would do, and everyone should know these are enormous changes — top down — from the federal government to the states, and we really want states to actually be running their own election procedures for national elections. This is what the Democrats want. The only reason they can’t get it is they don’t yet have the votes because Kyrsten Sinema says she’s not down with this.

CLAY: Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin. And it’s worth mentioning too — me, putting my lawyer hat on here, Buck — if this bill were to pass, we would spend years in litigation over whether this bill is constitutional or not. And we would have all the different circuit courts weighing in. We would have all the district courts. Eventually, the Supreme Court would have to step in and decide this thing.

It’s just a colossal mess. But, fortunately, there are enough sane people who are at least staying committed to some aspect of the idea of the filibuster needing to exist. And I thought that Kyrsten Sinema, who has a piece that went up yesterday in the Washington Post — this follows Joe Manchin writing in a local West Virginia newspaper — basically cutting the legs out from underneath this.

Kyrsten Sinema says, the headline is: “We Have More to Lose Than Gain by Ending the Filibuster,” and it’s a really interesting argument. But in particular, what I thought was most fascinating about it is, she gently, gently calls out her entire party and says — and I’m reading directly from her piece in the Washington Post — “Good-faith arguments have been made both criticizing and defending the Senate’s 60-vote threshold.

“I share the belief expressed in 2017 by 31 Senate Democrats opposing elimination of the filibuster — a belief shared by President Biden. While I am confident that several senators in my party still share that belief, the Senate has not held a debate on the matter.” She drops a bombshell there on her own political party.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: We’ll talk about it.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: There is the idea that we saw with the judges, right? The Supreme Court, the fact that you change it — and obviously Mitch McConnell, there’s a viral clip where he says to Harry Reid (summarized), “You may regret this day. I think you’re gonna regret this day. You may regret it much sooner than you expect,” and, boom! It ends up happening, obviously, in 2020 that the Democrats changed the rules and then the Republicans are able to come in over the top and Trump gets three Supreme Court justices. But, Buck, the downside here is something we were talking about off air, and I think it’s a pretty cogent argument.

BUCK: Well, this goes to why conservatives get so frustrated even when they have a majority, which we did, at least — total majorities — for the first two years of Trump administration. Democrats, Clay, wield power. They have an idea, they want to pursue it, they go for it. Conservatives, as we were joking around during the break… Conservatives, generally… When I say “conservatives,” by the way, I mean, Republicans now. Now we’re talking about elected officials not the ideology of conservatism. GOP officials, they want to cut taxes.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: The Democrats, when they have a majority, want to change the fundamental structures of government, change the electoral map, create an amnesty for — I know it’s officially 11 million, but ask anybody, as I have, at Border Patrol, and it’s more like — 15 to 20 to 20-plus million illegal immigrants in the country. They want to make sure that they are a permanent majority.

They don’t want this pendulum effect.

They don’t want the back-and-forth.

So that’s why D.C. statehood, Puerto Rico statehood, court packing. These are all things. Supreme Court packing. These are things that we could play clip after clip of Democrats in the past including some today who are saying that they would do these things when back when, they were very clear that this would be destabilizing, this would be harmful, that there should be some rights of a political minority, the constitutional checks and balances.

You know, there’s a line. I think it’s Frank Herbert, Children of Dune. “When you are strong, I ask for freedom, because that is according to your principles. When I am strong, I demand obedience, because that is according to my principles,” and this is the way the Democrats approach politics. When they can get what they want, they go for it.

When they to want to make an argument about balance of powers in the Constitution, it’s not because they actually believe in those things in a principled sense. It’s because they want protection from the very rules that they would implement against on the other side, and that’s why I think the filibuster issue is so interesting now. I do think, Clay, that the Democrats have at least recognized that on the judge side of things that they did have to deal with the consequences of that mushroom cloud from the so-called nuclear option.

CLAY: It is such a fascinating question to me, and that’s why reading Kyrsten Sinema’s editorial — as I just did a little bit from the Washington Post. She points out first the hypocrisy here, right? Thirty-one Senate Democrats opposed ending the filibuster in 2017, including President Biden — then, obviously, not the president.

But what is so fascinating about this is her real argument is something that is ingrained, I think, in many different minds out there in America. What the filibuster maintains and guarantees is that we don’t have massive swings based on who happens to end up in power in any given year. And this ties in, Buck, you were talking about — I think, really sort of interestingly there — the argument that you made about minority and majority rights.

When I was in constitutional law class, I remember my professor, Rebecca Brown, saying, “Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what’s for dinner,” which is really kind of an interesting way to think about it. Minority rights matter a great deal in our government. You probably heard this story. It may be apocryphal over time.

Thomas Jefferson and George Washington talking about the senatorial saucer. Have you heard this story where Jefferson would say, “Why did you…?” Washington asks Jefferson, “Why did you pour that coffee into your saucer before drinking?” “To cool it. My throat is not made of brass,” and the argument is the Senate is the cooling mechanism in our country, right?

And it is such a fascinating way to think about it because, if we allow the Senate to be governed by a 50-50 tie-break vote by Kamala Harris in either direction, then that Senate saucer which is supposed to cool the overall heat of the temper in this country, I think, threatens to become much more of a conflagration and make things that much worse and that much more heated. We need a little bit of coolness sometimes in this country, particularly in a social media era.

BUCK: When you look at sweeping legislation, though, in the last two decades, I think, is a good example of this, putting aside foreign policy and wars and stuff for a moment, domestic, sweeping domestic legislation, when Democrats have the option, they go for it.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: When Republicans have the option, the Senate is the place for passions to go and cool off or whatever.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: And the truth is that the Democrat Party of today is increasingly embracing a whole bunch of different people call it cultural Marxism and racial Marxism and even sometimes economic Marxism.

CLAY: What I would say is insanity.

BUCK: And as long as that’s the ethos that they have, they believe in — and I’m somebody — and this goes back to the era where I had to deal with the jihadists in the Counterterrorism Center at the CIA. You know, you should take your opponents seriously and at their word, right? You should believe them when they say things. The radical left fringe of Democratic Party is really no longer the fringe. They’re actually the ethos.

CLAY: They’re driving the bus.

While actual violent criminals are supposed to be getting increasingly a pass. These are revolutionary characteristics. This comes from people that really do believe in a fundamental transformation of the country. So while we sit here… Just the fact, Clay, that we’re even having this debate about getting rid of something that has been in existence in the Senate as long as it has specifically to avoid what they’re talking about doin’, just goes to show you that we’re often defending on our goal line here and thinking that we’re on offense.

CLAY: Well, I think your point is a good one to the call from Florida. There’s a difference between a tax decrease — which may end up getting taken away in four years or two years or whatever else — and a fundamental transformation. Because if, for instance, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico became states, they’re not going to be un-becoming states. Right? Like, you can change a tax rate, which is what they’re trying to do right now, right?

You can change the capital gains rate. You can. That happens all the time throughout history based on who’s in positions of power. But once you give a state senators, you can’t un-ring that bell. And once you decide that you’re gonna have 15 Supreme Court justices if that became the law, you can’t suddenly go in and just say, “Hey, you six Supreme Court justices, you can’t exist anymore.”

There’s a difference between advocating for a belief that you have which may or may not be permanent, which is typically what Republicans are trying to do, and go out there and fundamentally alter the trajectory and transformational nature of our government, which is what would happen if this filibuster did not exist.

BUCK: And you look at what they’ve wanted from the beginning and what Joe Biden, I would note… He went from, you know, grandpa who’s always squinting and acting like he’s about to hug America.

CLAY: He has no idea what’s going on.

BUCK: He’s sort of wandering around. He’s got the handlers making sure he doesn’t call the wrong people at the press conferences. We know how that goes. We got Joe Biden wandering around during the election and, of course, Trump, they made it sound like he created covid in Mar-a-Lago in a lab or something.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: I mean, it was all his fault.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: That was the approach.

CLAY: And it was racist if you even mentioned China’s responsibility.

BUCK: That’s right, and that then transformed very quickly the Biden messaging transformed after the election to, “Okay, now we actually have the Trojan horse.” You know, the Trojan horse is in the gates of Troy, so to speak. So we can actually allow the progressive stuff to start to come out and see what they can get away with. You mentioned how there are some things you can’t undo.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: You can’t un-ring the bell. I think in some ways, the biggest… You could roll back the For the People Act, theoretically, if you could actually win enough elections to do it, right, to get that majority, which I don’t know if you could do.

CLAY: If it’s legal, even, which I question —

BUCK: Which is a big question as well.

CLAY: — constitutionally if it’s even permissible.

BUCK: It’s the federalization of elections which are supposed to be controlled, as we all know, by the states. But amnesty is, I think, still the single most obvious extension of exactly what you’re talking about. When you give people permanent legal status, the chance of you taking that away is zero. That’s never going away.

And the Democrats recognize that between changing — and look, it’s almost like dealing with… I don’t want to say, “evil geniuses,” ’cause they’re not that smart, but maniacal and somewhat evil strategy here. They see that they only have a certain period here before they’re gonna have to run back to being a little more normal. They gotta put Grandpa Joe out there to make everyone feel like everyone’s gonna be cool before the midterms.

CLAY: That’s right.

BUCK: So it’s between now and the real midterm cycle kicking in that they’re trying to push and push and push. If they don’t get radical transformation in Year 1, they might have to wait ’til they do a head fake in the midterms.

CLAY: And maybe not even Year 1, Buck, because think about how often… The reason why Democrats have control in the Senate right now is because of the lack of health in Georgia. Right? We had a specializing election because a senator could not fulfill his term. There are a lot of old people in the United States Senate.

Statistically if you look at the data, we saw before years and years ago Jim Jeffords decided to such parties. I don’t necessarily think a Joe Manchin or Kyrsten Sinema is ever gonna switch parties, but there’s a lot of unhealthy people in the United States Senate. There’s a lot of people over the age of 70. So it may not even be until 2022 until we have some sort of health-related condition that could arise, and that’s why so much of this is being pushed to need to happen right now while you have the auspices of the crisis out there.

BUCK: And everything that we’re saying right now about the cooling of the passions in the Senate —

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: — the pressure doesn’t stop, folks, on Manchin or Sinema.

CLAY: Correct.

BUCK: And right now, sure, they’re able to — and I think they like it.

CLAY: Their intention.

BUCK: Look, the Democrats have a John McCain situation here where I think they like the national attention and there’s a lot of power.

CLAY: They’re basically as powerful or more powerful than the president right now.

BUCK: But then think of the amount of pressure — and you and I both know the way. The one thing that Democrats always do so much better than the other side, it drives me insane, is all the inducements. Oh, it’s so sweet to go along with the Democrat machine!

CLAY: You’re a hero.

BUCK: Those book deals are waiting for you.

CLAY: Yeah.

BUCK: Those Netflix consulting deals. Those professorships, board seats. You know, that’s the stuff that people don’t hear about when you talk about some of these senators right now who are holding the line for the filibuster. All it takes is you get a couple breaks in that dam, cracks in the dam, and we got a whole different ballgame all of a sudden.

Recent Stories

NYC Mayoral Primary Could Be Defund the Police Tipping Point

22 Jun 2021

BUCK: We could sit here all day, Clay, and just have longtime senior and respected law enforcement experts, people that have spent their careers doing this telling us all the same basic story. Which is that there is a nationwide deterioration and safety on city streets, and we’re talking the top 50, the top 100 cities by population.

This is what’s going on across America. Why? We’re gonna get into the why, but there’s one place where this is playing out right now in real-time in a political sense, and it’s my hometown of New York City. You have right now, essentially, Clay, a battle between… There’s a bunch of different candidates, and it’s a ranked voting system, which is a little strange.

New York just instituted this I think in 2019. You put 1 through 5 and then if no one gets 50% on the first round, they get rid of the bottom-tier candidate, and then they retabulate. And then they get rid of the candidate that’s bottom tier, and then they retabulate.

So it could a matter of weeks before find out the answer. But here’s why this is so interesting. I’m wanting your take on this. Again, I grew up in New York City, Clay. I could sit here and tell stories about what that city was like when there were over 2,000 murders a year in the early 1990s.

CLAY: I think a lot of people listening to us remember, even if they didn’t grow up there, just walking through Times Square, and how much difference before Rudy Giuliani and after.

BUCK: A hellscape.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: And I live there, and I love it. I love New York. I’ve always been a big New York proponent, although the political leadership is just getting dumber and worse all the time, it seems. But it was so dangerous, you had by the Bloomberg era — from, let’s say, 2,300 homicides a year, give or take, in the early 1990s, Mayor Dinkins — down all the way to about 300 murders. So over 2,300 to 300.

CLAY: One of the most successful eradications of crime in the history not only of the United States, but of the world.

BUCK: And people look at this and they see that what happened in New York was also a harbinger of what was to come in a lot of other cities because we just had the former Boston police chief. Guess what? The NYPD model — and I was an intelligence division specialist at the NYPD for a while, so I know those folks very well. The NYPD model was applied in all these other cities, the Giuliani crime method, and it worked.

CLAY: The broken windows. People know the phrase.

BUCK: And it’s not just enforcing minor laws because it creates a greater sense of law and order, but it does. It’s also creating more of basis for police contact with those who break the law. Because it turns out — and we ran the experiment, we saw the data in New York and a lot of other cities — the guy who is jumping the turnstile is much more likely to also be the guy (and it’s guys we’re talking about here) who has a warrant out for an attempted murder, or has a warrant out for a serious crime.

CLAY: Same thing with the guy who doesn’t have his tags updated. People who don’t have their driver’s permits and everything else set up, are also more likely when they get pulled over to have outstanding warrants that are significant of a violent nature.

BUCK: And this is why the two real polls, if you will, or the separation, the major separation in this mayoral race… You have Andrew Yang, who we all know. he’s a popular guy. People like him. I’ve interviewed him. I don’t know if you’ve interviewed him, but he’s a likable guy. He’s smart. He’s very pro-business, and he had a pretty interesting run — short-lived but interesting run — for the Democrat primary as president. And now he’s getting a pretty decent bit of support. But it’s really between based on this narrative of pro-police or defund police.

CLAY: It’s going to decide the election.

BUCK: That is the primary issue, and Adams right now, Eric Adams, who’s a former police captain of the NYPD —

CLAY: A 22-year veteran.

BUCK: This guy is law enforcement through and through. He’s now borough the president of Brooklyn. He is pro-police to the point where he wants to bring back the plane clothes unit that was disbanded, as essentially a gift to the BLM movement. As we all know, this didn’t work out well for anybody.

He also might even bring back some of the elements of — it has been talked about, at least — stop-and-frisk, which became very controversial and Mayor Bill De Blasio got rid of. But thinking about this, Clay, in a sense this is like the crucible for law enforcement action that is on the largest scale. It’s the biggest police department in the country, the biggest city in the country.

And we see the numbers going in the wrong direction. Not only could you have Eric Adams end up winning basically on the crime issue, being pro-police and anti-crime, but then the rest of the country is gonna have to see what ends up happening with those policies playing out, because people will know that the defund movement is clearly failing, so we gotta find something else to do.

CLAY: Defund the police is popular with super rich white people, primarily — who live in neighborhoods that typically aren’t very dangerous in the first place — and also with super-rich activists who oftentimes have their own private security details. The number one to me litmus test should be, if you have ever had private security or paid for it, you can’t argue that police need to be defunded.

Because you are actually taking the next step beyond! You’re like, “No, the police around enough to make sure that I’m safe. I’m going to spend my money to make sure that I have my own security on top of the security provided by police.” So for some people out there, I understand they’re gonna say, “I don’t live in New York. I don’t care about this story. I don’t care about this overall election.”

What I believe you are missing is that this is a larger metaphor for the nation as a whole and the debate we’re having over whether or not policing is in crisis and whether we should be defunding it — and also, as a part of that larger conversation, it’s an internal civil war with the Democratic Party right now.

There’s a lot of talk in the mainstream media about the internal civil war that exists in the Republican Party and they always want to trot out Elizabeth Cheney and say, “Oh, look, are they allied with Trump or are they not allied with Trump? They don’t even allow freedom of speech in their own party!” Well, this is a real civil war, because Elizabeth Cheney is a small segment of the Republican Party, right? This is the essence of Democratic Party right now.

BUCK: And who supports defund police and who do you hear from on this issue? It’s activists, MSNBC hosts, and the far left of the elected Democrats.

CLAY: AOC.

BUCK: They’re the only ones. Now, it’s so interesting. I don’t even know, Clay, if you were alluding to this or not, because your comment about people who pay for their own security while they want to defund? That’s actually true of Maya Wiley. She lives in an almost $3 million mansion —

CLAY: Of course she does.

BUCK: Her husband’s a private equity guy.

CLAY: Good for him.

BUCK: Remember “Vulture Capital” with Mitt Romney and Bane and all that, right?

CLAY: Right.

BUCK: Her husband’s a private equity guy, and she, it came out, has a neighborhood association where they all pay dues for a private security force.

CLAY: On top of the police.

BUCK: On top of, of course, having police protection. But she wants to defund — and she’s even been pushed on the issue of disarming — cops.

CLAY: Which would be crazy.

BUCK: Yeah.

CLAY: She basically said that she wanted them to not have guns and then she tried to walk it back.

BUCK: So you have on the one hand that in a sense, the quintessential defund liberal, somebody who lives in a multimillion-dollar house, has private security.

CLAY: Of course.

BUCK: Oh, and guess what? She also has her kids in private schools.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: While she’s a huge proponent of making sure that all the rest of New York City has no school choice, her kids go to a fancy private school. And this is, in many ways I feel, the distillation of the modern Democrat elite.

They don’t even try to hide this stuff anymore. So it’s gonna be either Eric Adams as … Remember, Eric Adams, African-American police captain of over 20 years. By the way, the guy’s still a Democrat. We’re really picking among the best socialists here in a sense. But at least he wants you to be safe walking home with groceries in your hands instead of what you’re getting with Maya Wiley.

CLAY: By the way, the controversy I believe with Eric Adams, if I’m not mistaken, is whether he actually lives in New York City, which is its own funny story, right?

BUCK: Yes.

CLAY: So you have on the left, the far left-wing, Maya Wiley who wants police officers to have no guns, except for the private security guards who protect her and her family and her multimillion-dollar mansion. And then you have Eric Adams, who is on the positive side a 22-year veteran of the New York Police Department, but might not actually live in the city in which he’s running to be mayor of.

BUCK: I mean, he’s got a —

CLAY: This is a perfect contrast, and these are the two prongs that are most likely to win, right?

BUCK: He’s got a place that doesn’t look so much like it’s that lived in, but it is technically.

CLAY: I watched the video.

BUCK: You saw the video? (laughing)

CLAY: I care… And for someone who lives in Nashville, Tennessee, and has lived in Nashville his entire life, I am an example of someone who is following this election closely, one, because I love elections, but two because I think it puts defund the police on the ballot. Right?

This is ultimately rubber meeting road in a highly liberal city to see whether or not the data, which I’ve looked at. You talked about I like to look at the data. The data I’ve looked at and everybody has shared, no one of any kind of serious intellect supports defunding the police. There are no arguments that support it in any way.

BUCK: In fact, the African-American community specifically —

CLAY: Huge, huge majority wants more police.

BUCK: — wants more police, because as you’ve pointed out when you look at disproportionate effects of crime in low-income neighborhoods —

CLAY: The people getting killed by crime rates rising overwhelmingly are black.

BUCK: And we haven’t even addressed the Republican side of this equation, which is real. Now, New York City, folks, has about an 8-to-1 disparity in party registration. So, you know, Clay gets to live —

CLAY: I live in a red state.

BUCK: — in freedom in a red state here in Tennessee. I’m from New York, which is, you know, very expensive commieville. But I still love it. But here’s the thing. You have Curtis Sliwa, who is the founder of the Guardian Angels

CLAY: Oh yeah.

BUCK: — who is also on the ballot. I know Curtis, interviewed Curtis, he’s a good guy. So in a sense, you have the ultimate pro-police/public safety candidate who’s also there. I’ve talked to people who say that, you know, it’s obviously an uphill climb. But here’s the thing. If you were to see — because of the ranked voting no one really knows how this is gonna work out — if Maya Wiley ended up being the candidate or even some of the others… I didn’t even mention, but you’ve got Kathryn Garcia, the sanitation commissioner —

CLAY: Who’s now allied, I think, with Yang. Like, they’re trying to pair their votes.

BUCK: That’s right.

CLAY: They’re trying to come together.

BUCK: And AOC is the primary backer, publicly, at least, not financially, but in terms of public support for Maya Wiley. But if Wiley’s the candidate, you may have… This is the theoretical and it’s unlikely, I just want to say, but you may have this moment where people say, “Look, Rudy Giuliani was a Republican, folks. Bloomberg, Mayor Bloomberg, was technically a Republican.”

CLAY: Both of those guys did phenomenal jobs protecting the residents of New York City, which to me is the essence of the job of the mayor.

BUCK: I told everybody, ’cause there was… Look, Bloomberg on guns is horrible. Your Mountain Dew, by the way?

CLAY: (laughing) I know.

BUCK: He would have security escort you out to pour it out.

CLAY: I know. I’d get taxed like crazy to sit here and drink a Mountain Dew during the show.

BUCK: Yeah, exactly. You’d be paying through the nose.

CLAY: He’s a businessman who at least understands the importance of business in a city like New York, which I think a lot of these candidates have no clue of.

BUCK: Can I…? I wanted see if we could… You want to…? Let’s bring in some folks to hear what they think about this.

CLAY: Yeah! Let’s do it.

BUCK: It’d be fun if we do that, and then also I’ve got just a quick anecdote for you about Portland, ’cause I don’t want to focus too much on one East Coast city. We could talk Portland, we could talk LA, we can talk a lot of places. But you gotta hear how Portland’s tourism, folks, are trying to sell people on still visiting that anarchic wasteland in downtown Portland right now. So why don’t we come back to that.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

CLAY: New York native Buck Sexton is making his best case — and I think he’s right — for why you and I should care about what’s happening today in the New York City mayoral election even though we’re probably not gonna know for a little while who actually ends up winning that election, and why it is in many ways a referendum on the defund the police movement. You have on the one side of the education — even though it is within a Democratic primary — Eric Adams, who is a 22-year veteran of the New York Police Department. And then on the other end of the spectrum, you have Maya Wiley, who has said maybe they don’t even necessarily need guns.

BUCK: Just social workers, Clay!

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: Social workers.

CLAY: If somebody has a gun, we should just have a social worker show up and explain to them why they should stop shooting people. That will be a viable response — and of course, as is typically the case, Maya Wiley has her own security detail, Buck, that is actually protecting her in New York City even while she believes the rest of the population should have to be defunding the police.

BUCK: Oh, let’s not forget they also… Not only do they want to defund police, but they also want to make sure that you can’t defend yourself with the right to bear arms in New York, which is a whole other subject.

CLAY: That’s a big mess.

BUCK: I know this one intimately because I’ve had to go through the process of talking to folks about what you can and can’t do and —

CLAY: It’s a sub-plot of Billions

BUCK: It’s crazy.

CLAY: — what you have to do get a gun license.

BUCK: Getting a concealed carry permit in New York is for ultra-elites.

CLAY: Yes.

BUCK: When you look at who actually has a concealed carry. You can’t open carry in New York. But even the premise permit. Anyway, people that live in Texas and Tennessee are like, “Your problem.” So anyway… (laughing) True, by the way. Fact-check: True.

Recent Stories

Get to Know Clay & Buck: Mountain Dew and Soccer?

22 Jun 2021

BUCK: Welcome back to The Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show. Lines are open, and we are lit in the —

CLAY: Lit! (laughing)

BUCK: — studio here. (laughing) That’s right.

CLAY: Drinking!

BUCK: They are lit up. We are lit.

CLAY: Drinking heavily —

BUCK: (laughing)

CLAY: — to get through Tuesday.

BUCK: (laughing)

CLAY: I know the feeling.

BUCK: It’s early in the day, folks, but we’re–

CLAY: He thinks this is water, but it’s actually been vodka that I’m drinking out here.

BUCK: Clay is drinking Mountain Dew.

CLAY: You were making fun of me.

BUCK: For those who are wondering, “Is Clay a guy from Tennessee?” He loves Mountain Dew.

CLAY: You made fun of me. I have a lot of, I would say, fairly substantially redneck traits, having been born and raised in the Nashville area of Tennessee. And one of the things that I just can’t quit, I love Mountain Dew. Like if I’m out at a restaurant and it’s a chain restaurant and they have Mountain Dew on the menu, I literally feel better about my whole meal.

BUCK: That’s an astonishing —

CLAY: Revelation?

BUCK: — revelation. (laughing)

CLAY: Like, I would order… Like, I’ll give you an example. There’s a restaurant called Stoney River. It’s a steakhouse. I don’t know, they probably with 50 or a hundred of them around the country, right? Chain, steak restaurant. They have — or at least used to have — Mountain Dew on the menu. So, I would be like, “I want a filet mignon, medium rare, and I’m gonna chase it with Mountain Dew.” (laughs)

BUCK: Hopefully, you at least get your steaks medium rare —

CLAY: That’s what I just said.

BUCK: — like a civilized person, right?

CLAY: I just said.

BUCK: All right. All right. Yeah. Not —

CLAY: I’m not a barbarian.

BUCK: Only thing about Trump that I gotta say, I really had a hard time with —

CLAY: He got it well done. He got it well done.

BUCK: — he’s a well-done guy. I love the Trumpster, but the well-done steak? That was a big question mark for me, like, “What’s going on with that?”

CLAY: I feel like people who get their steak well done don’t know that they are basically insulting the steak and everyone who is cooking the steak, right? And they may well have never tried a medium rare — and I’m closer to a rare than I am a medium, right? Like, you want to have some flavor in the steak.

BUCK: Of course. It’s all about not cooking the connective tissue and the juice out of it. But we’ll have to do our grilling tips another day, ’cause I got… Do you cook? I’m actually pretty good in the kitchen.

CLAY: I can’t cook anything.

BUCK: Really?


CLAY: It’s funny, my 6-year-old… We talked about this a little yesterday. So I coach Little League basketball and Little League basketball. We were sitting in the gym recently — this was March, maybe — and one of the first people who listened to my show came up and said, “Man, I’m a big fan of the show,” and he said to my 6-year-old, “What’s it like living with a guy who’s on the radio like this? Is it pretty cool?” And he said, “No, Dad doesn’t even know how to cook cinnamon rolls,” which is all that matters to my 6-year-old.

BUCK: Wow.

CLAY: Like, I can make oatmeal. That’s about the height of my cooking ability for the breakfast in the morning. I can make cereal. But I can’t make cinnamon rolls. Like, that is beyond my understanding. When I got married, when I started… When I first got married, my wife came over to where I was living, and she said, “Where are the pots and the pans?”

Reasonable question. We were gonna cook one night. I didn’t have pots and pans, Buck, and I had not even notice that I didn’t. I’d lived in this place for a couple years, never thought, “Hey, I need pots and pans. If I can’t microwave or I can’t just throw it in the oven and immediately, like a pizza, make it there I’m not gonna be able to do it.”

BUCK: I’m glad. See, this is the ultimate pairing and duo you have here, folks, because I’m not gonna lie: #ChefWolfgangBuck has trended once or twice.

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: This is something that pops up on the social media.

CLAY: So what do you make?

BUCK: I — I can’t —

CLAY: Any and everything?

BUCK: I can’t give away all my secrets. This is —

CLAY: What’s your specialty?

BUCK: This is —

CLAY: What’s your specialty?

BUCK: Red meat obviously.

CLAY: Well, is that really a specialty?

BUCK: Yes!

CLAY: I feel like anybody can cook steak.

BUCK: Oh, my gosh. We can talk sous vide. We can talk reverse sear, but this is not a cooking show, Clay, so I have to —

CLAY: I don’t even know what that means.

BUCK: See what I mean? You bust out the fancy French terms and that’s all you have to do.

CLAY: I know. It totally blows my mind.

BUCK: I also, by the way… You brought up the Little League the thing. One day, I’ll tell you. I actually… The first job I ever had… I actually have to correct something from my bio on the show yesterday. The first pay job I ever had —

CLAY: Yes?

BUCK: — was coaching high school soccer at my high school while I was waiting for my security clearance at the CIA.

CLAY: How was the team?

BUCK: We were undefeated, and we were runner-up in the NYC Archdiocese championship. I don’t know, maybe the best soccer team the school had had in, I think, 18 years. No big deal, Clay.

CLAY: How old were you?

BUCK: No big deal.

CLAY: How old were you?

BUCK: Right out of college. Like, it’s that fall.

CLAY: Do you realize that you are losing credibility with the audience massively by being a soccer guy in the first place, right?

BUCK: What do you mean!

CLAY: I’m not anti-soccer.

BUCK: Wow. Wow.

CLAY: I am not anti-soccer in any way.

BUCK: Direct your ire, soccer players, to @ClayAndBuck on Twitter and tell him.

CLAY: What percentage of our audience likes soccer?

BUCK: I mean, not a huge —

CLAY: Right now.

BUCK: — but would it be better if I was a New Yorker who played lacrosse?

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: Then we’d be making fun of my ascot.

CLAY: Look, I would like right now, you to all tweet us — I just want a simple “yes” and “no” — if you’re active on social media. Let me just say, this ’cause I don’t want soccer people comin’ after me, ’cause soccer people —

BUCK: Oh, no, no.

CLAY: No, no. Hold on.

BUCK: You’ve done it. You’ve done it.

CLAY: Soccer people are the most insecure sports fan on the planet, right? In my experience, a soccer guy sits around all the time saying, “How come you don’t talk about soccer? How come you don’t talk about soccer? How come you don’t…?” and then you talk about soccer, and they immediately say, “Oh, you don’t know what we’re talking about! You don’t like soccer like I like soccer.” You can’t make them happy. It is the snobbiest, snottiest of all American sports fans: A soccer fans with a scarf sitting in his Harry Potter hat in the crowd.

BUCK: Snobby? It’s like the most multilingual —

CLAY: In the world —

BUCK: — multiethnic sport on Planet Earth!

CLAY: In the world, it is.

BUCK: (groans)

CLAY: Soccer fans in the world are like Mexican soccer fans throwing urine at people, you know, with the anti-gay slurs. Like they are the absolute, like, massive population, right? Like the everyman is a fan of soccer around the world. In the United States, the American soccer fans is the sports snob. I think a small —

BUCK: Just… I ask the soccer fans in the audience to unleash the Twitter Kraken here and explain… (laughing) explain how it works.

CLAY: I’m actually curious to go in right now. You can find me.

BUCK: Oh, they’re all gonna say that it’s basically like a communist sport.

CLAY: I was gonna say.

BUCK: I know how this goes.

CLAY: I think they’re gonna be saying, “I didn’t like this guy, Clay Travis. I questioned him a lot. But then he said, ‘Oh, you know, I’m not sure you need to be a hard-core soccer guy.'” Now, I will say this. I do… I played soccer. I played every sport kind of growing up. But I love watching the U.S. men’s team play.

And they kicked Mexico’s ass recently, which I really enjoyed — and, by the way, Christian Pulisic is maybe the greatest American soccer player of all time — and I think next year in the World Cup, if people will actually circle back around to, “Yeah, America is a good thing,” it will actually be a lot of fun because we can make a legitimate run.

BUCK: I mean, I just gotta tell you: For those of you whose heads are physically too big to wear helmets for hockey or football… I’m not speaking from a first-person perspective here, but I just want to say, you know, there gotta be other options out there.

CLAY: I’m scrolling in right now.

BUCK: I don’t even want to hear it. I don’t even want to hear it.

CLAY: First, people are taking shots at me. “Please tell me you at least go Diet Mountain Dew.” First, like, you would have less respect for me if I were drinking Diet Mountain Dew, wouldn’t you? At least I’m going, like, this is like a bud-heavy version of Mountain Dew.

BUCK: See, I’m not alienating those Diet Mountain Dew drinkers in our audience, Clay. I refuse to pick sides in the Mountain Dew battles, ’cause I haven’t had Mountain Dew, I think, since I was 12.

CLAY: Here’s all the soccer responses. Like, I can’t even keep up right now with everybody.

BUCK: (laughing)

CLAY: @ClayTravis, @BuckSexton, the soccer responses are rolling in. There are… Again, I think the vast majority of the audience — I also think you would agree. The Twitter responses are more like to like soccer ’cause they’re probably younger. A 75-year-old guy out there is not like, “Yeah, I love Buck Sexton and I love soccer.”

BUCK: Well, I mean, it depends on where they’re from. That’s the thing.

CLAY: Well, that could factor in.

BUCK: You know? I’m sure we got some expats and some, folks… If you’re an immigrant to the United States, the chance… What is the most likely sport for you to love? The most likely, if you move to the United States from anywhere in the world —

CLAY: The world sport is soccer. There’s no doubt. That’s why I said, the elite of America like soccer. The everyman of the rest of the world likes soccer.

BUCK: I just feel like right now, there are all these soccer moms are listening, and they’re like —

CLAY: (laughing)

BUCK: “Excuse me, sir, Mr. Clay Travis, football is dangerous!”

CLAY: (laughing)

Recent Stories

Rush’s Timeless Wisdom: Democrats Distort Dr. King

22 Jun 2021

CLAY: What would Martin Luther King himself think about modern-day critical race theory and its assault upon traditional American values, Rush Limbaugh discussed that. Listen.

RUSH: Dr. King, one of his most famous passages was that he hoped that his kids someday would grow up in a country where — I’m paraphrasing — the content of their character was the single greatest determining factor about the kind of people they were, rather than the color of their skin. Now, Dr. King — and I have no problem saying this at all — Dr. King would not recognize the modern iteration of the Democrat Party.

He did believe in nonviolence. And he might have had a political motivation now and then of playing, throwing down the race card, but that was not who he was. It was not the defining thing about Dr. King. And so much is being done in his name that he never supported. I think he would be shocked, probably is. But it’s kind of like saying the same of JFK. JFK would not be welcomed into the Democrat Party today.

JFK believed in tax cuts, for example, and a whole lot of other conservative economic principles. And yet all of these things that the Democrat Party supposedly believes in are being done in the name of people like JFK, but more importantly, Dr. King. And I’m telling you Dr. King would not recognize the Democrat Party today. And I have no compunction saying that he wouldn’t want any part of it, or a large part of it.

BUCK: It’s interesting, Clay, that the Democrat Party today — and Rush there really understanding their misunderstanding on the Democrat side of what the vision of the country was from Martin Luther King. They embraced treating people differently, and this is at the heart of CRT.

CRT, it’s an acronym, and it’s really just that this is an oppressive, racist country, and you have to put a leftist elite in charge of balancing that out or else the racism just perpetuates and we live in a society of constant injustice, misery, and people just feeling like they can’t get fair treatment anywhere. Instead of the country that I think we all know we live in which is the best, freest, most amazing country that’s ever existed, still, even with all of its problems.

CLAY: What it essentially says is your identity defines you, and I don’t know about all of you, but I certainly think the things that I can’t choose are the least interesting thing about me. I didn’t choose my race. I didn’t choose my gender. To me, those are the least interesting things about me. I’m more interested in the choices that people make as individuals than I am the things that you have no control over.

Recent Stories